Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Proving CreationWrong: No Water for a Flood
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Uergil
May 27, 2012, 12:36:00 AM5/27/12
to
In article <saidnUfmpZZWA1zS...@earthlink.com>,
"Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net> wrote:
> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
> news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> > "duke" skrev:
> > (snip)
> >>
> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
> >
> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>
> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>
> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>
> This is what happened...
Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
before the beginnings of humanity.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
"Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net> wrote:
> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
> news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> > "duke" skrev:
> > (snip)
> >>
> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
> >
> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>
> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>
> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>
> This is what happened...
Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
before the beginnings of humanity.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
duke
May 27, 2012, 10:51:44 AM5/27/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:36:00 -0600, Uergil <Uer...@uer.net> wrote:
>In article <saidnUfmpZZWA1zS...@earthlink.com>,
> "Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net> wrote:
>
>> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
>> news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>> > "duke" skrev:
>> > (snip)
>> >>
>> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
>> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
>> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
>> >
>> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>>
>> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>>
>> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>>
>> This is what happened...
>
>Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
>which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
>before the beginnings of humanity.
Then why is the current world covered 80% by water. Lower the mountains and
>In article <saidnUfmpZZWA1zS...@earthlink.com>,
> "Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net> wrote:
>
>> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
>> news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>> > "duke" skrev:
>> > (snip)
>> >>
>> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
>> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
>> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
>> >
>> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>>
>> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>>
>> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>>
>> This is what happened...
>
>Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
>which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
>before the beginnings of humanity.
raise the oceans, and how thick do you think the water layer would be?
duke - American American
*****
2012 - end of an error
Vote Republican in 2012
*****
Wombat
May 27, 2012, 11:58:16 AM5/27/12
to
On May 27, 4:51 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:36:00 -0600, Uergil <Uer...@uer.net> wrote:
> >In article <saidnUfmpZZWA1zSnZ2dnUVZ_i2dn...@earthlink.com>,
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:36:00 -0600, Uergil <Uer...@uer.net> wrote:
> > "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>
> >> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
> >>news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> >> > "duke" skrev:
> >> > (snip)
>
> >> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
> >> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
> >> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
>
> >> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>
> >> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>
> >> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>
> >> This is what happened...
>
> >Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
> >which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
> >before the beginnings of humanity.
>
> Then why is the current world covered 80% by water. Lower the mountains and
> raise the oceans, and how thick do you think the water layer would be?
>
> duke - American American
>
> *****
> 2012 - end of an error
> Vote Republican in 2012
> *****
How would you suggest it be done without the energy involved melting
>
> >> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
> >>news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> >> > "duke" skrev:
> >> > (snip)
>
> >> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
> >> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
> >> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
>
> >> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>
> >> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>
> >> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>
> >> This is what happened...
>
> >Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
> >which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
> >before the beginnings of humanity.
>
> Then why is the current world covered 80% by water. Lower the mountains and
> raise the oceans, and how thick do you think the water layer would be?
>
> duke - American American
>
> *****
> 2012 - end of an error
> Vote Republican in 2012
> *****
the Earth's crust and boiling the oceans.
BTW, since you ignored it earlier here is the question again. When
was Ye Floode? Was there a human yclept Noah involved?
Wombat
May 27, 2012, 1:30:24 PM5/27/12
to
On May 27, 4:51 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:36:00 -0600, Uergil <Uer...@uer.net> wrote:
> >In article <saidnUfmpZZWA1zSnZ2dnUVZ_i2dn...@earthlink.com>,
> > "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>
> >> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
> >>news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> >> > "duke" skrev:
> >> > (snip)
>
> >> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
> >> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
> >> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
>
> >> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>
> >> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>
> >> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>
> >> This is what happened...
>
> >Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
> >which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
> >before the beginnings of humanity.
>
> Then why is the current world covered 80% by water. Lower the mountains and
> raise the oceans, and how thick do you think the water layer would be?
>
> duke - American American
>
> *****
> 2012 - end of an error
> Vote Republican in 2012
> *****
1.7 miles. Your point?
>
> >> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
> >>news:4fc15cff$0$292$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> >> > "duke" skrev:
> >> > (snip)
>
> >> >> My statement was conclusive when I stated that at one time Mt Everest
> >> >> was just a speed bump. A "smooth surface" earth does not take much
> >> >> water to make a visible depth of a flood.
>
> >> > Do you have any evidence that confirms your statements? No!
>
> >> The antediluvian world was much different than what we see today.
>
> >> > Where did the water come from? You have no answer,
>
> >> This is what happened...
>
> >Such a claim is refuted by the objective physical evidence of geology,
> >which sows that no earthwide flood can have occurred since considerably
> >before the beginnings of humanity.
>
> Then why is the current world covered 80% by water. Lower the mountains and
> raise the oceans, and how thick do you think the water layer would be?
>
> duke - American American
>
> *****
> 2012 - end of an error
> Vote Republican in 2012
> *****
0 new messages