-- Morality, Piety, Value Systems and Lawful Christian Religious Belief
(c) 2016 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 16 June, 2016
dolf: "Hail God of Hymen!
What do you say to the claim that Jubilee 2000 celebrations was the
worship of Satanism?
Off to hell with you as God Almighty blasphemous Christ murderous and
forsaken ignorant dogs that you are.
There will be no more pleasant talk between us, as I will curse you with
every word from my mouth, such is my God ordained right to do so.
Your opportunity for repentance is gone.
You have lost your soul."
Duke (Catholic) Earl Weber: "God doesn't give us desires. He gives us
the good sense and the proper guidance to get us to elect to turn
against the hate, bad, wrong and to embrace the love, good, right in
love of God.
Barry (Athiest/Heisenberg) O'Grady: "Why doesn't God give us desirable
desires?"
Duke (Catholic) Earl Weber: "You refused them."
Gordon (...@
swbello.net): "God gave us suitable desires as you suggest
but Satan is also in the midst of our thinking and he has burdened us
with those undesirable desires. And, God is using our exposure to this
as a means for maturing us to a suitable level of understanding and
controlling those desires. It is God's intention that we will mature to
a level that will make us suitable for immortality and absolute
sovereignty.
Absolute sovereignty would never have been possible had God
pre-programmed us as perfectly behaved puppets, nor would intimidating
us into compliance as slaves have worked. The only process that will
work is to let us learn by direct and indirect exposure to the effects
of sin and rebellion. When we've completed this learning phase we will
then do God's will exactly, because God's will and our individual,
sovereign personal wills shall then be exactly the same."
Gys de Jongh (jong...@Planet.nl): "Thanks Gordon, That explains it all
You are so good in this, why don't you start a religion yourself?
Or are you GOD?
Testing his creatures on Usenet?"
Barry (Athiest/Heisenberg) O'Grady: "Why does God cause Satan to act
that way?
Sounds like Satan is an essential part of God's plan and that Satan will
have a special wonderful place in heaven when this is all over.
Should we worship Satan for his part in our redemption?"
Gordon (...@
swbello.net): "Satan's behavior was/is a matter of his
sovereign will and non-compliance with the will of God."
Barry (Athiest/Heisenberg) O'Grady: "Why does God want that?"
Gordon (...@
swbello.net): "Satan and the fallen angels had no experience
or in-depth understanding from hands on learning about the effects of
sin and rebellion. Had God deleted Satan and those fallen angels it
would likely have been only a matter of time before another group of
God's angels went the same way."
Barry (Athiest/Heisenberg) O'Grady: "Has God lost control of his creation?"
Gordon (...@
swbello.net): "The key point in all this is that there is no
way any of us could use our sovereign will to learn about the effects of
sin and rebellion.
God had to let Satan go into this and let us humans go along for the
learning process."
Barry (Athiest/Heisenberg) O'Grady: "Sounds like Satan is an essential
part of God's plan and that Satan will have a special wonderful place in
heaven when this is all over.
Should we worship Satan for his part in our redemption?
dolf: "Catholic cockroaches ought to learn procreational restraint and
breed only within their economic means (animals by nature breed when
nature is conducive -- but not Catholics)
Do cease being so carnally promiscuous as locusts and some of you ought
to die off."
Lest you become a bare, destitute and economically failed State such as
is occurring within South America.
God forsaken Christ-murderers that they are."
Rod (Catholic): "I had nothing at all to do with whatever crazy stuff is
going on in your life, Dolt ... sorry ... I mean Dolf.
If you weren't completely a loon I wouldn't be laughing so hard!
You are cracking me up!"
(ie. the beginning-ARCHE and the ending-TELOS [Revelation 1:8) and, What
thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which
are in Asia; unto Ephesus {desirable}, and unto Smyrna {myrrh}, and unto
Pergamos {height; elevation}, and unto Thyatira {a perfume; sacrifice of
labor}, and unto Sardis {prince of joy}, and unto Philadelphia {love of
a brother}, and unto Laodicea {just people; Laodikeia-Laodicea [G2993]:
#351}." [Revelation 1:11]
I have as an Intellectual Property, a mathematical paradigm as an
alternative HOMOIOS Theory of Number being a metaphysical theoretical
noumenon and a determined contrivance associated with attributed time
(COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis), rationality and the reasoned mind:
Telos (6,000) = Arch (0) + c² : arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}
Where the c² is equivalent to a constant dependent on n, calculated by
the formula:
M = [n(n² + 1)] / 2
SEE IMAGE OF GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON:
-
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=458226327704542&set=rpd.100005515364934
the provinces of the king Ahasuerus {prince; head; chief}, to lay hand
On the basis of an inferred as implied "Illegality Defense", Legal
Counsel made an application to the Tribunal, for an order to dismiss any
surviving legal claim that I still had before the Tribunal, in that it
had survived an earlier and initial Directions Hearing held sometime in
March 2001. I acquiesced to this application and consequentially some
$6,000 in legal costs were awarded against me. Whilst the Insurer has
never sought to recover those costs, neither has it required for me,
under the provisions of the Salary Continuance Policy, to provide any
further medical evidence in substantiation of a Total and Permanent
Disability claim. And after 12 years of having provided such medical
evidence.
This wrongful conduct by Peter Riddell, to mischievously represent such
telephone messages as the substance of the allegation, I had engaged
within "criminal" conduct, being then the grounds for an extra-ordinary
VCAT hearing, seeking to dismiss any surviving legal claim. It's
gravity can better be understood, by his 25 January 2013 published
comments, made as Managing Partner of Turks Legal (2002-present)
Melbourne office.
Legal Counsel for the Insurer, Mr. Riddell by hand delivered letter
dated 4 December 2001 to Cate McKenzie, Deputy President,
Anti-Discrimination List, Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal,
claiming: "I wish to bring to your attention a most serious matter in
relation to the above proceedings.
The writer has recently received a number of threatening calls from the
Applicant. A report has been made to the Victoria Police who have
considered the matter to be serious. They have noted details of the
threats and have asked to be updated if there are any further occurrences.
A transcript of the threatening messages is attached for your perusal.
This matter has now proceeded through a protracted timetable (see
enclosed documentation) in which Mr Boek has been given the opportunity
by the Tribunal to re-submit voluminous and irrelevant material on
numerous occasions.
The Respondents have real concerns about the manner in which the
Tribunal has managed Mr Boek's complaint, which has now escalated to a
point where the security of the Respondents' representatives has been
threatened.
In these circumstances, I would request an opportunity to meet with the
Tribunal so it may listen to the voicemail messages and advise as to
what steps VCAT will be taking to address the events which have developed.
I await your urgent response.
Yours faithfully."
The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
telephone hook-up.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.
In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November [2001] in the morning I
received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call,
advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed
those messages on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content
of those messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety
of my family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and
reported the matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They
suggested that I not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is
why I am presenting myself by way of telephone today.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those
THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.
MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am on 7 December 2001]
THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
which I will not cease until I have your soul.
You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
when one of us going to the grave."
TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if you
are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are
going to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your
religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to
rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to
understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."
MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.
...
MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such
a way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a
false claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear
from Mr
MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which
is mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by
Johann Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with
three rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the
Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of
Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years -
Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].
His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.
THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.
MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the
radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in
equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to
the cube of the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each
planet.
Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a
mathematical model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus
C-squared:
Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]
That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative
life. The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to
this particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the
Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry
that is used in...
MR RIDDELL: Madam, could I object?
...
MR RIDDELL: *I* *am* *not* *sure* *that* *the* *intention* *is*
*entirely* *relevant*. *It* *is* *the* *manner* *in* *which* *I*
*reasonably* *interpreted* *those* *phone* *messages*. *There* *is* *a*
*transcript* *before* *the* *court*. *I* *was* *threatened*.
Mr Boek, by his conduct today and in the past, on any objective view
appears to be unstable. I think it is inappropriate that this matter be
continued.
PETER RIDDELL ON JANUARY 2013 PUBLISHED THIS PERSPECTIVE:
TITLE: "The Illegality Defence: Has your insured been misbehaving?"
Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing life and disability
claims may have cause to consider an insured's unlawful conduct and
whether grounds arise to decline a claim on the basis of the illegality
defence. There are a number of aspects to the illegality defence. This
paper reviews the impact of public policy on claims for indemnity
arising out of unlawful conduct on the part of insureds.
WHO DOES THIS IMPACT?
Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing disability insurance
claims.
WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN?
Unlawful conduct by an insured may allow an insurer to deny liability
for an insurance claim on the grounds that it would be against public
policy to allow an insured to receive a benefit under the policy.
As the application of public policy often involves making difficult
value judgments, each case will depend upon its own particular
circumstances. As such, you may first wish to seek advice as to what
action to take having regard to the facts of your particular claim.
ILLEGALITY AND PUBLIC POLICY
It is well established that a claim that arises out of a loss caused
directly in the commission of a felony or similarly serious criminal
offence by an insured can be denied on the ground that to pay the claim
would be contrary to public policy.(1) This is based on the principle
that no person should benefit from their crime or wrongdoing ("the
public policy principle").
SOURCE:
http://www.turkslegal.com.au/sites/default/files/publications/TurkAlert_-_The_Illegality_Defence_%28PAR%29.pdf
---------------------
AS THEY CLAIM TO HONORABLY SWEAR: DIEU ET MON DROIT [IE. GOD AND MY
RIGHT (THE MOTTO OF THE BRITISH MONARCH)] AND JUSTICE SYSTEM.
"Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first-PRŌTOS and the last-ESCHATOS:
(ie. the beginning-ARCHE and the ending-TELOS [Revelation 1:8) and, What
thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which
are in Asia; unto Ephesus {desirable}, and unto Smyrna {myrrh}, and unto
Pergamos {height; elevation}, and unto Thyatira {a perfume; sacrifice of
labor}, and unto Sardis {prince of joy}, and unto Philadelphia {love of
a brother}, and unto Laodicea {just people; Laodikeia-Laodicea [G2993]:
#351}." [Revelation 1:11]
I have as an Intellectual Property, a mathematical paradigm as an
alternative HOMOIOS Theory of Number being a metaphysical theoretical
noumenon and a determined contrivance associated with attributed time
(COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis), rationality and the reasoned mind:
Telos (6,000) = Arch (0) + c² : arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}
Where the c² is equivalent to a constant dependent on n, calculated by
the formula:
M = [n(n² + 1)] / 2
SEE IMAGE OF GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON:
-
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=458226327704542&set=rpd.100005515364934
This assertion relating to my undertaking of an intentioned
anti-terrorism initiative as PLANS. And this occurring as my only
activity made in SUPPORT, continued whilst I remained a recipient of a
salary continuance benevolence made under the provisions of an Insurance
Policy in full compliance as an acceptance of my Total and Permanent
Disability status. Is then capable of being established, as an
indisputable matter of fact, by a transcription record of the 7
December, 2001 proceedings occurring as an extra-ordinary hearing before
the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). It records my
self representation in a dispute with AXA Group Insurance made in
relation to my salary continuance policy. And my attempt to explain as
testimony then given to the Tribunal of my relative and lived actions,
as an activity which occurred contemporaneously to the Islamic terrorist
EVENTS of 11 September, 2001. As my ardent belief in it being at the
time, a milestone date as TELOS (ie. an ultimate object or aim. In the
hedonistic life, people lose some moral purpose, a TELOS which provides
the moral justification for the society).
The impetus and nature of my own covert religious based activism and
advocacy activity as an anti-terrorism initiative, has sought:
a) To effect a denial of any claimed "divine imperative" by the Islamic
terrorist group Al-Qaeda associated to the EVENT of 11 September, 2001
as terror attacks against the United States of America;
b) A PLAN to undermine the foundations of Islamic extremist religious
belief; and
c) Give an auxiliary and prerogative (ie. a privileged right of the
sovereign that is theoretically subject to no restriction) SUPPORT to
any Gay and Lesbian Community's initiatives towards the adoption of same
sex marriage legislation.
And further on the notion of TELOS I would agree (beyond its Biblical
eschatological notion) with Epicurean and other Greek Philosophers
additional deliberations of it:
Because Epicureanism posits that pleasure is the ultimate good (TELOS),
it has been commonly misunderstood since ancient times as a doctrine
that advocates the partaking in fleeting pleasures such as constant
partying, sexual excess and decadent food.
This is not the case. Epicurus regarded ataraxia (tranquility, freedom
from fear) and aponia (absence of pain) as the height of happiness and
that such pleasure is the ultimate good (TELOS). He also considered
prudence an important virtue and perceived excess and overindulgence to
be contrary to the attainment of ataraxia and aponia. [Epicurus, "Letter
to Menoeceus", contained in Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent
Philosophers, Book X; Wikipedia 2016:Epicurus]
There is also in relation to TELOS, a sense of eudemonia (flourishing),
by the enabling of work as the service or a duty in regard of others and
pursuit of a higher ideal.
Understanding the purpose of work brings meaning to what we do. And
deeply a desire to 'make a difference' in the world. In order to do
this, we must first work. But in the midst of all this work, it can be
easy for disillusionment and cynicism to take root; people become
frustrated with their work. There are many reasons for this, not the
least of which is burnout. I believe we often lose sight of the purpose
of work, the meaning of work, and the end goal of work. Put simply: Why
do we work? What is the goal? In order to answer this question, I will
borrow and modify Aristotle's conception of a TELOS, or 'purpose.'
Aristotle's TELOS can be thought of as an ultimate object or aim. This
TELOS in Aristotle's view is Eudemonia (flourishing), which Aristotle
describes as "the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end
of human existence." [Aristotle, Ethics, Bk. 1 Ch. 7] Although Aristotle
frames flourishing as an abstract end, I have taken this concept away
from the philosophical and applied it. For me, this flourishing can be
achieved through my work. In order to accomplish Eudemonia through
work, we must have a goal. Otherwise, work feels meaningless. We must be
working towards something. Meaningful work has a vision, a long-run mission.
What does this end goal, or TELOS, look like? Put simply, it can be
expressed as service. There is a dual purpose to work as service:
serving other's needs, and through that, serving a higher aim or ideal.
This unique perspective is what is most important to me. I serve not
because of some blind adherence to rules, or out of some Kantian
conception of Duty. I believe that the work I do genuinely serves
others, fulfilling the TELOS of work, thereby reflecting the image of
God. [Created to Serve: The TELOS of Work, Josh Satre, The Augustine
Collective,
http://augustinecollective.org/augustine/created-to-serve]
Through tying it to the Dead Sea Scrolls 364 day/year calendar reprise
EVENT occurring on the Equinox of Wednesday 20 March, 1996 / New Moon of
Thursday 21 March, 1996 and then further associating it to the
historical and conventional mapping as a Magic Square paradigm (ie.
Celestial Hierarchy) of attributed time and governance, providing a
custodial centre #41 of the seven #369 magic squares on 13-17 September,
2001. I had by such a cataclysmic EVENT and a transcendent
chronological/mathematical principle, seriously challenged the
foundations of Islamic belief, internalized and silenced their
conflicted state and that of other religious belief systems such as
Judaism, Freemasonry, Catholicism and Christianity in it's many forms.
So ardently did I hold such a cosmological and metaphysical belief
concerning TELOS, which in my view was of such a grave character in
having a sufficient degree of seriousness or "moral culpability" as a
matter of public concern. That out of a consideration of courtesy, I
then telephoned legal counsel for the Insurer. Unfortunately this
occurred after I had rushed up and down four flights of stairs within my
home. Such that, my temporary exhausted state introduced an exasperated
tone within my phone messages, which I had left in the absence of
speaking directly to Mr Peter Riddell as their Legal Counsel
(2000-2002). It was by such a strenuous characteristic, that it
unnecessarily gave rise to an opportunistic cause for the Insurer to
have an implied recourse to an "Illegality Defense". As an improper and
misconceived view of the essential character of those messages which was
mischievously represented by the Insurer's Legal Counsel, as possessing
a characteristic of it being "frightening and threatening in nature".
Such as to require the incident being reported to the Victoria Police,
as an alleged criminal conduct. And who then viewed the matter most
seriously, suggesting that Legal Counsel not then present himself in the
presence of Mr Boek, which is why he represented himself by way of
telephone this day of 7 December, 2001.
The extra-ordinary VCAT hearing was presided over by the visually
impaired madam Deputy President Cate MacKenzie, because the Insurer, by
such conduct of mine, sought to dismiss any surviving legal claim that I
continued to have before the Tribunal and which had an initial
Directions Hearing held sometime in March 2001.
Despite the clear theological/philosophical context of those two
telephone statements, I was categorically prohibited and frustrated by
the Tribunal, which prevented me from conveying any such religious
explanation as thought content within my discourse as any defense made
to the Tribunal.
As considerations made of work-progress and informal Theory of Number
and Natural Jurisprudent research expressed as philosophical/theological
opinion on the possibility of deploying theoretical meta-principles,
which I had observed in practice by the Victoria Police and the
Judiciary as Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales, namely:
#237 - USE OF FORCE
#277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST
I informally made this opportunistic public comment as the means for an
effectual resolution to global religious based extremism, by obtaining a
consideration of a value added consensus. It was a response to the
Islamic outrage and violent protest which occurred just prior within
proximity to the War Memorial in Hyde Park, Sydney.
I quote from that public statement: "I want to propose a formula of
progression with respects to transitioning #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST
towards a computational function and the ability to deploy other
transformative prototypes for corrective, policy or administrative
functions.
In order to do so, I suggested taking the Hierarchy of Categories from
this #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which especially have temporal
connections and cascading these within the #237 - USE OF FORCE.
After all, the A-U-M aspect of the traditional Chaldean (Babylonian)
form of the Hebrew letters can then be considered as a TRIAGE of our
vMEMETIC view of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON--Which appears to be
the thematic character of the Letters Patent to the Australian
Constitution of 1901."
It is also possible to view this dispensational basis of governance
shown above by memetic specific colour attributions {ie. vBeige/vBronze:
#69, vPurple: #9, vRed: #32, vBlue: #20, vOrange: #61, vGreen: #73,
vYellow: #35, vTurquoise/vCyan: #58, vCoral: #41} accompanying the
conception of Pythagorean Number and Platonic solids as also capable of
being conveyed in terms of stages, tectonics of knowledge or process,
states or provinces, or phases of a cycle or development {eg: the
Indigenous Australian Aboriginal regard (mythical or otherwise) for
seven climatic zones comprising the seasonal year}, historically, as a
milestone, by covenant, as authority and power, or simply as specific
daemons provided by the temporal / noumenal reality mapping at the
chronological 4th plane of the Grapple paradigm:
#69 - Profound Use, Function of the Mysterious; I-Ching: H34 - Strength
of Greatness; Tetra: 22 - Resistance;
#9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching: H7 -
Army; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
#32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 - Coming On;
Tetra: 43 - Encounters;
#20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 -
Withdrawal; Tetra: 50 - Vastness/Wasting;
#61 - Virtuous Humility at Using 'Beneath'; I-Ching: H64 - Before
Completion; Tetra: 78 - On the Verge;
#73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Moving Upward;
Tetra: 7 - Ascent;
#35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence; I-Ching: H17 -
Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
#58 - Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 -
Resolution; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness;
#41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26 -
Restraining Force; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation
Mr Peter Bowditch with encouragement from the Skeptics Society of New
South Wales (Australian Skeptics Incorporated), has attempted to make a
parody of myself and hobby as determined activity which is confirmed
within this May-August 2002 entry upon his www-page. Being a record of
my objection made against his unreasonable interference within my
associated private and informal activity as consequential to dialogue
which had previously occurred with Mr. Christopher Cowan as co-author of
'Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change'. Against
whom, he also disparages by an inclusion within his catalogue of loon
curiosities solely to satisfy his debauched and narcissistic desire for
entertainment without regard for others and oblivious to any consequence.
My Internet discussion with Mr. Christopher Cowan occurred before the
EVENT of 11 September 2001 and was the impetus for my subsequent
interest as the development of a metaphysical theoretical noumenon and a
determined contrivance associated with attributed time (COURSE-trochos
OF NATURE-genesis), rationality and the reasoned mind.
These statements are quite acceptable jurisprudence when understood in
the Natural and Common Law context of religious belief having a value
statement about the permissibility of an inclusiveness as a
self-identity which is free from institutional impunity (ie. #237 - USE
OF FORCE and #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST) as a transcendent and
sovereign autonomous right--Which our human rights and equal opportunity
legislation does not recognize.
---------------------
MattB (trdell12345): "The Problem with these that call themselves
Christian here is many don't follow the Bible they take this piece and
that piece and make it say what they want and have so much hate.
Some even say tradition overrides the words of Jesus."
Patrick (Catholic) Barker: "Who says that? LIAR?"
dolf: "Thus your comment speaks of the great abysmal depth of depravity
and perversity which is entirely your own claim to a faux-piety as an
enduring exonerated state of being and cockroach ignorance which it
claims is a virtue.
You are a Christ-killer Catholic neophyte after all.
I have the substance of apperception to make such an unremorseful pious
claim as the lawful basis of my own religious belief.
I've now ceased all civil pleasantry with your ilk and am purposefully
engaged in a more rigorous tone of dialogue.
Godless scum that you are."
- dolf
Facebook post titled, "Morality, Piety, Value Systems and Lawful
Christian Religious Belief" of 16 June, 2016
-
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=470177143176127&id=100005515364934