Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

YEAH Fox News! WOW! Incredible Coverage!

3 views
Skip to first unread message

tracey12

unread,
May 13, 2013, 10:06:28 PM5/13/13
to
THANK YOU FOX NEWS!

Over the past 24 hours, Fox News has geared up and is rightly focusing on
the horrific IRS and Benghazi scandals.

YET, its not just fluffy junk, but serious, hard core reporting of all the
most current data on these two scandals.

All I can say further is that I am very impressed at the fairness and yet
the high detail that Fox News is reporting to the American public about the
ever increasing tyrannical nature of the Obama administration.

Watch Fox News! ITS GREAT!

Go Get'em Fox!

wy

unread,
May 13, 2013, 10:17:22 PM5/13/13
to
They're feeding you junk. There's no story other than the one they
want to keep fabricating for you to keep swallowing voraciously as if
it were Rush Limbaugh's crusty, week-old cum on your sofa. The
military doesn't have the kind of cartoonish capability to come to an
instant rescue that Repugnants cartoonishly fantasize about.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57584087/gates-some-benghazi-critics-have-cartoonish-view-of-military-capability/

Get a handle on yourself already - and I don't mean grab yourself and
jerk off, either.

Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E

unread,
May 13, 2013, 10:25:39 PM5/13/13
to
On May 13, 9:17 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> On 13 May, 22:06, tracey12 <wes12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > THANK YOU FOX NEWS!
>
> > Over the past 24 hours, Fox News has geared up and is rightly focusing on
> > the horrific IRS and Benghazi scandals.
>
> > YET, its not just fluffy junk, but serious, hard core reporting of all the
> > most current data on these two scandals.
>
> > All I can say further is that I am very impressed at the fairness and yet
> > the high detail that Fox News is reporting to the American public about the
> > ever increasing tyrannical nature of the Obama administration.
>
> > Watch Fox News!  ITS GREAT!
>
> > Go Get'em Fox!
>
> They're feeding you junk.  There's no story other than the one they
> want to keep fabricating for you to keep swallowing voraciously as if
> it were Rush Limbaugh's crusty, week-old cum on your sofa.  The
> military doesn't have the kind of cartoonish capability to come to an
> instant rescue that Repugnants cartoonishly fantasize about.
>
Ohh? Tell us about your vast military experience Commander? So
howdafukk did a Seal team get in, kill Bin Laden, then get out without
losing one man?


> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57584087/gates-some-benghazi-cri...

Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E

unread,
May 13, 2013, 10:33:26 PM5/13/13
to
On May 13, 9:17 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> On 13 May, 22:06, tracey12 <wes12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > THANK YOU FOX NEWS!
>
> > Over the past 24 hours, Fox News has geared up and is rightly focusing on
> > the horrific IRS and Benghazi scandals.
>
> > YET, its not just fluffy junk, but serious, hard core reporting of all the
> > most current data on these two scandals.
>
> > All I can say further is that I am very impressed at the fairness and yet
> > the high detail that Fox News is reporting to the American public about the
> > ever increasing tyrannical nature of the Obama administration.
>
> > Watch Fox News!  ITS GREAT!
>
> > Go Get'em Fox!
>
> They're feeding you junk.  There's no story other than the one they
> want to keep fabricating for you to keep swallowing voraciously as if
> it were Rush Limbaugh's crusty, week-old cum on your sofa.  The
> military doesn't have the kind of cartoonish capability to come to an
> instant rescue that Repugnants cartoonishly fantasize about.
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57584087/gates-some-benghazi-cri...
>
> Get a handle on yourself already - and I don't mean grab yourself and
> jerk off, either.

No soldiers or Obama coming,
We're finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drumming,
Four dead in Benghazi.
Gotta get down to it
Islamists are cutting us down
Should have been done long ago.
What if you knew him
And found him dead on the ground
How can you run when you know?
Gotta get down to it
Obama is cutting us down
Should have been done long ago.
What if you knew him
And found him dead on the ground
How can you run when you know?
No soldiers or Obama coming,
We're finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drumming,
Four dead in Benghazi.

Kicking Ass and Taking Names

unread,
May 13, 2013, 10:34:36 PM5/13/13
to
I've been watching cat videos on YouTube. More content and closer to
the truth than anything on Fox.

wy

unread,
May 13, 2013, 11:20:04 PM5/13/13
to
On 13 May, 22:25, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
<burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 9:17 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 13 May, 22:06, tracey12 <wes12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > THANK YOU FOX NEWS!
>
> > > Over the past 24 hours, Fox News has geared up and is rightly focusing on
> > > the horrific IRS and Benghazi scandals.
>
> > > YET, its not just fluffy junk, but serious, hard core reporting of all the
> > > most current data on these two scandals.
>
> > > All I can say further is that I am very impressed at the fairness and yet
> > > the high detail that Fox News is reporting to the American public about the
> > > ever increasing tyrannical nature of the Obama administration.
>
> > > Watch Fox News!  ITS GREAT!
>
> > > Go Get'em Fox!
>
> > They're feeding you junk.  There's no story other than the one they
> > want to keep fabricating for you to keep swallowing voraciously as if
> > it were Rush Limbaugh's crusty, week-old cum on your sofa.  The
> > military doesn't have the kind of cartoonish capability to come to an
> > instant rescue that Repugnants cartoonishly fantasize about.
>
>    Ohh? Tell us about your vast military experience Commander? So
> howdafukk did a Seal team get in, kill Bin Laden, then get out without
> losing one man?

They already had people stationed in next door Afghanistan and no
ambassador was being attacked to come to his rescue, the US was the
one planning out the attack to kill bin Laden - GIGANTIC difference.
There are no military units or hardware near Libya and by the time it
was learned by the White House what was going on, an hour had passed,
by which point the ambassador and three others were probably already
dead and couldn't be saved. But instead of wallowing in your own
stupidity, why don't you watch Robert Gates' interview in the link who
explains what the situation was in Libya and the US's incapabilities
there and why don't you read the actual report issued by the State
Department last year on what happened and who was at fault:

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf

And don't be so boy, you're stupid.

wy

unread,
May 13, 2013, 11:28:10 PM5/13/13
to
On 13 May, 22:34, Kicking Ass and Taking Names
Henri the existential Cat is a good one:

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/5081/henri-from-willbraden

There's more of him on Youtube.

W.T.S.

unread,
May 14, 2013, 12:05:49 AM5/14/13
to
In article <2f7b0d2d-8b8c-43bd-9fa5-1e51ebe29828
@v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, burto...@gmail.com says...
>
> On May 13, 9:17 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> > On 13 May, 22:06, tracey12 <wes12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > THANK YOU FOX NEWS!
> >
> > > Over the past 24 hours, Fox News has geared up and is rightly focusing on
> > > the horrific IRS and Benghazi scandals.
> >
> > > YET, its not just fluffy junk, but serious, hard core reporting of all the
> > > most current data on these two scandals.
> >
> > > All I can say further is that I am very impressed at the fairness and yet
> > > the high detail that Fox News is reporting to the American public about the
> > > ever increasing tyrannical nature of the Obama administration.
> >
> > > Watch Fox News!  ITS GREAT!
> >
> > > Go Get'em Fox!
> >
> > They're feeding you junk.  There's no story other than the one they
> > want to keep fabricating for you to keep swallowing voraciously as if
> > it were Rush Limbaugh's crusty, week-old cum on your sofa.  The
> > military doesn't have the kind of cartoonish capability to come to an
> > instant rescue that Repugnants cartoonishly fantasize about.
> >
> Ohh? Tell us about your vast military experience Commander? So
> howdafukk did a Seal team get in, kill Bin Laden, then get out without
> losing one man?
You don't know much about SEAL teams or their history, do you?
>
> > http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57584087/gates-some-benghazi-cri...
> >
> > Get a handle on yourself already - and I don't mean grab yourself and
> > jerk off, either.
>

Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of
women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/
>
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22270271
>
http://tinyurl.com/anghyfr
>
http://tinyurl.com/a887er9
>
http://tinyurl.com/c4thugl
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
>
Breed like rabbits, live like pigs, die like rats!
>
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public
expense.
>
http://www.imnotsorry.net
>
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17gbnyv0yzhevjpg/original.jpg
>
http://tinyurl.com/7q2ft38
>
http://tinyurl.com/7hk9gk8
>
http://tinyurl.com/ybmwsk4
>
http://tinyurl.com/ayk7czf
>
http://tinyurl.com/43hp62x
>
http://tinyurl.com/b29z62n
>
The methodology of the Religious and the Right has always been:
1. Lie.
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible.
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible.
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie.
5. The lie will then be made into some form of law.
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie.
-> Slow thinkers --> Stay Right

Tracey12

unread,
May 14, 2013, 4:38:10 AM5/14/13
to
Wow, just a little Fox News story got a bunch of ants crawling.

Kenny McCormack

unread,
May 14, 2013, 9:08:52 AM5/14/13
to
In article <4l83p8l12p0joopd3...@6ax.com>,
Kicking Ass and Taking Names <PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
...
>I've been watching cat videos on YouTube. More content and closer to
>the truth than anything on Fox.

So true. A keeper. Going into the sig file.

--
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is
no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

- John Kenneth Galbraith -

FEMA Camp Commander. Welcome to Agenda 21

unread,
May 14, 2013, 9:26:46 AM5/14/13
to
On 5/13/2013 9:17 PM, wy wrote:

> They're feeding you junk. There's no story other than the one they
> want to keep fabricating


Consisting no one watches FOX NOISE who aren't in a
retirement home tied to machines to stay alive, it is
pretty much a moot point.


George Kerby

unread,
May 14, 2013, 9:42:00 AM5/14/13
to



On 5/14/13 8:26 AM, in article
51923b95$0$12781$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net, "FEMA Camp Commander. Welcome
I don't think your libtard dad doesn't have time for that between the
beating by Nurse Ratchet.

Ron

unread,
May 14, 2013, 11:10:21 AM5/14/13
to
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

opel

unread,
May 14, 2013, 4:16:09 PM5/14/13
to
On 5/14/2013 9:10 AM, Ron wrote:
> Tracey.....would you please try to be consistent in your posts?

Ron, would you please put a bullet through your festering statist head?

Paul Duca

unread,
May 14, 2013, 11:21:31 PM5/14/13
to
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 4:16:09 PM UTC-4, opel wrote:
> On 5/14/2013 9:10 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> > Tracey.....would you please try to be consistent in your posts?
>
>
>
> Ron, would you please leave us to our Fox News fantasies?

opel

unread,
May 18, 2013, 12:47:46 PM5/18/13
to
On 5/13/2013 8:34 PM, Kicking Ass and Taking Names wrote:
> I've been watching cat videos on YouTube.

It shows.

Tracey12

unread,
May 18, 2013, 5:44:25 PM5/18/13
to
On May 14, 10:10 am, Ron <roneal1...@att.net> wrote:

> Tracey.....would you please try to be consistent in your posts?  Here
> is a short list of posts by "Tracey12" whom I assume is you, in which
> you slam Fox News.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.religion.christian/40jP9C...
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.religion.christian/AcH_8f...
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.religion.christian/YT9clo...
>
> http://alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.narkive.com/EyJkrKMa/fox-news-avoiding-a...
>
> etc.

I am not consistent?

The fact that I hold Fox responsible for what they do isn't
consistent?

Have you ever had an argument with your wife or husband?

If you have, does that mean your love for your spouse is inconsistent?

I love Fox News, but Fox is not always on track and sometimes the
network presents information that is either lacking in detail, or is
faulty in some other way. As it stands, Fox is just about all we have
in the news reporting business that is even handed and pro America.

If Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin were not
around, America would become a communist dictatorship over night, in
my opinion. So, it is very important that Fox News be hard hitting in
its investigative and news reporting business regarding government
since our liberty is at stake. When I see Fox is off track in some
way, I generally will say something about it because of the importance
of what they do at Fox.

Therefore, my occasional criticism of Fox does not mean I am
inconsistent in my posts. It means I am consistent in my values and
concern for our future.





Message has been deleted

•RLMeasures

unread,
May 19, 2013, 8:20:00 AM5/19/13
to
In article <v0fgp89jarjsucs50...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:44:25 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I love Fox News, but Fox is not always on track and sometimes the
> >network presents information that is either lacking in detail, or is
> >faulty in some other way. As it stands, Fox is just about all we have
> >in the news reporting business that is even handed and pro America.
>
>
> Gee, TraceyLoon
>
> Do you suppose that the following contributes to the "problem"??
>
> 1) Murdoch is a tabloid-type media asshole. Weekly World News is his
> kind of publications. The origin of Faux snooze was openly started
> because "a demographic was open to hearing THEIR views amplified,
> without having to hear truth".
>
> 2) 90% of the Faux programming is Conservative advocacy and slanted
> analysis to coicide with the demographic's "Beliefs".
>
> 3) NewsCorp has no corporate standards of ethical journalism they
> require anyone to follow.

• England's cellphone hacking scandal tells us what we need to know about
NewsCorp's / Murdoch's ethics.

> The closest it gets rests on the
> "integrity" of the individual. Even if the news anchor doesn't
> "lie"---they make sure the "news" reflects the core constitutency's
> beliefs.
>
> 4) NewCorps DENIES it is a "news channel" in court documents when
> defending itself against civil actions related to false "news" and/or
> information.
Message has been deleted

George Kerby

unread,
May 19, 2013, 10:55:52 AM5/19/13
to



On 5/19/13 7:20 AM, in article r-1905130...@10.0.1.3, "�RLMeasures"
<r...@somis.org> wrote:

> In article <v0fgp89jarjsucs50...@4ax.com>,
> Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:44:25 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I love Fox News, but Fox is not always on track and sometimes the
>>> network presents information that is either lacking in detail, or is
>>> faulty in some other way. As it stands, Fox is just about all we have
>>> in the news reporting business that is even handed and pro America.
>>
>>
>> Gee, TraceyLoon
>>
>> Do you suppose that the following contributes to the "problem"??
>>
>> 1) Murdoch is a tabloid-type media asshole. Weekly World News is his
>> kind of publications. The origin of Faux snooze was openly started
>> because "a demographic was open to hearing THEIR views amplified,
>> without having to hear truth".
>>
>> 2) 90% of the Faux programming is Conservative advocacy and slanted
>> analysis to coicide with the demographic's "Beliefs".
>>
>> 3) NewsCorp has no corporate standards of ethical journalism they
>> require anyone to follow.
>
> � England's cellphone hacking scandal tells us what we need to know about
> NewsCorp's / Murdoch's ethics.
>

Much like the ILLEGAL phone taps of the AP by the Obama Administration, eh,
Measures, hmmmmmm?!?

•RLMeasures

unread,
May 19, 2013, 11:18:43 AM5/19/13
to
In article <51lhp8lk287pvel5h...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> Exactly so....
>
>
> Actutally, the thing that is "admirable" about Murdoch----is that he
> doesn't deny any of it.

*** he's a True Believer.
>
> He's said repeatedly in interviews that he "saw an opportunity to make
> money in a venue that was "wanting something" and then provided it.
>
> It's the idiots who get their "news" from that channel that assign it
> legitimacy that the "Big 4" must back up with policy.

•RLMeasures

unread,
May 19, 2013, 11:21:41 AM5/19/13
to
In article <CDBE5228.9BE38%ghost_...@hotmail.com>, George Kerby
• Harry Truman was the Pres. who authorized NSA snooping. 'W' was the
Pres. who took it to a new level.
0 new messages