Re: Quaker peace testimony
Rod
> On Apr 10, 9:30 pm, Rod <icom...@att.net> wrote:
>> <<<~A John 3:16 Whosoever~>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 10, 8:53 pm, Rod <icom...@att.net> wrote:
>>>> Yes Kelly, it was me trying to get away from being stalked
>>>> and harassed by you because of your obsession with me. I'm
>>>> serving notice on you now officially, leave me alone and get
>>>> some help with your obsession.
>>>> Get this...don't post about me, to me, or follow me from group to
>>>> group. I desire to have a normal life back that doesn't have you in
>>>> it and I'm ready to do what it takes. Do you understand ?
>>>> Don't respond, just do it....
>
>
>>> Don't presume you have a right to tell me what to do. Do you
>>> understand?
>
>
>> yes, you're nuts.
>
> You can go ahead and tell yourself that and try to get those in here
> to believe it -
>
> But the truth is that *you* are the one who has been stalking *me* and
> subjecting me to harrassment - with threats of violence (veiled and
> direct): putting bombs in my mailbox, placing a bomb under my car,
> following me home one night from work in order to do me harm, sending
> me something poisonous or deadly in the mail - the list goes on. It
> is you have made sexually harassing remarks to me in Usenet. It is
> you who has chosen to use hate-speech against me and toward me. It is
> you who has followed me around Usenet using sock-puppets. You are the
> one who has scanned and hacked into my computer (and others' in
> Usenet). It is you who has impersonated government officials in
> Usenet. It is you who has lied about me over and over again. Again,
> the list goes on (and on and on).
>
> It is because of all of this that I was forced to call your local law
> enforcement and make a *informal* complaint. Don't for one moment
> think, however, that the option of making a *formal* complaint has
> been taken off the table. But, whether the necessity to do so exists
> is completely up to you. Leave me alone, and I will leave you
> alone.
>
> It's really quite simple.
plonk
--
<<<~A John 3:16 Whosoever~>>>
> plonk
Very wise, Rodney. Now let's see if you stick to this "resolve" (that
includes all of your sock-puppets, too).
Chloe
"<<<~A John 3:16 Whosoever~>>>" <kasey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:602db8c4-8b72-42e3...@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> plonk
-----------------------------------
Why don't you find yourself a wife, and live happily ever after ;-)
Rod
"Chloe" <ch...@home.com> wrote in message news:ftmtf4$ro9$1...@aioe.org...
What a horrible idea ...........
<<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>>
> Why don't you find yourself a wife, and live happily ever after ;-)
Oh, I'm quite happy in a very long-term relationship, Rodney.
Gee, I thought you were going to <plonk> me. So, that lasted - what?
- just a few minutes?
No surprise there.
Rod
And it sounds as if Chloe wants to marry you ??
Listen Kelly, that wasn't me. Thats WAS the real Chloe, or someones
sock, but not mine. I told you why I used a sock, and you should
believe it. I'm not Chloe, MattBr or anyone else. I simply admitted to
that out of frustration at trying to make you understand that I'm
not any of those. Someone IS messing with us both, and I'm not behind
it but the target of IT as YOU are.
If I truly knew who it was, I'd tell you JUST to get you off my back,
and happily so. I have you filtered out, not entirely as I don't trust
you for shit, and that is why I have responded here. I won't respond
again unless this shit keeps appearing, and yes I monitor this group
AND others as well.
I have every desire to see this stop, and no reason at all to talk to
you unless it is something like this. Now, I would suggest that if you
want this crap to end then disappear like I have tried to do, or learn
to read the headers much better.
And because this keeps happening you can depend on me to try and
disappear again for good. Don't look for me, and I won't look for you,
thats probably best if you honestly want this to end.
Good Bye Kelly.......
--
Chloe
"<<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>>" <kasey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:faeaab14-8d96-4d67...@h1g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
No surprise there.
----------------------------------------------
You are wasting way too much time on usenet to qualify for a happy
individual engaged in a happy relationship.
Look elsewhere, maybe for a man; it would cure your obsession with Rodney.
Rodney is married, and I am a heterosexual woman.
You haven't got a chance with either of us.....
Chloe
"Rod" <ico...@att.net> wrote in message
news:H%KLj.2021$%V7....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
> <<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>> wrote:
>> On Apr 10, 10:37 pm, "Chloe" <ch...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Why don't you find yourself a wife, and live happily ever after ;-)
>>
>> Oh, I'm quite happy in a very long-term relationship, Rodney.
>>
>> Gee, I thought you were going to <plonk> me. So, that lasted - what?
>> - just a few minutes?
>>
>> No surprise there.
>
>
> And it sounds as if Chloe wants to marry you ??
>
> Listen Kelly, that wasn't me. Thats WAS the real Chloe, or someones
> sock, but not mine. I told you why I used a sock, and you should
> believe it. I'm not Chloe, MattBr or anyone else. I simply admitted to
> that out of frustration at trying to make you understand that I'm
> not any of those. Someone IS messing with us both, and I'm not behind
> it but the target of IT as YOU are.
>
crappola was started by Kelly, when she insisted, and still does, that i am
you.
So who is messing with whom? If she would get her mind off you, her
paranoia would come to a stop, and leave other people alone. She is nothing
but a trouble maker.
Rod
> "Rod" <ico...@att.net> wrote in message
> news:H%KLj.2021$%V7....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
>> <<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>> wrote:
>>> On Apr 10, 10:37 pm, "Chloe" <ch...@home.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why don't you find yourself a wife, and live happily ever after ;-)
>>> Oh, I'm quite happy in a very long-term relationship, Rodney.
>>>
>>> Gee, I thought you were going to <plonk> me. So, that lasted - what?
>>> - just a few minutes?
>>>
>>> No surprise there.
>>
>> And it sounds as if Chloe wants to marry you ??
>>
>> Listen Kelly, that wasn't me. Thats WAS the real Chloe, or someones
>> sock, but not mine. I told you why I used a sock, and you should
>> believe it. I'm not Chloe, MattBr or anyone else. I simply admitted to
>> that out of frustration at trying to make you understand that I'm
>> not any of those. Someone IS messing with us both, and I'm not behind
>> it but the target of IT as YOU are.
>>
> Of course it wasn't you, nobody knows it better than you and I.
And that is a part of the problem Chloe. When I was leaving Kelly
alone she was still posting things about me periodically that were
negative and costing me friends, as well as accusing me of being a
nutcase.
Honestly, this crap IS going to drive me nuts.
That whole
> crappola was started by Kelly, when she insisted, and still does, that i am
> you.
> So who is messing with whom?
Honestly, I think there is a major game player in the baptist group as
Kelly has claimed, but my attempts to find them have been fruitless
at every turn but one. That person slipped up once and showed up at
my website, and that is where I obtained their ip address. I don't
believe Kelly realizes it yet, but just as she was tracking my
movements, this other person was tracking her and I at the same time,
and playing us off against one another.
> If she would get her mind off you, her
> paranoia would come to a stop, and leave other people alone.
Well first of all in her defense, she IS being stalked, as she
believes it is me doing it by use of socks. It isn't. The person
that is doing it was also posting as cub brave for a while.
I wrote a nice letter to an admin of an AOL server with a copy of
a header from a cub brave post, and he was kind enough to email me
a portion of the server access log on that date and time. The ip addy
on the incoming packet section of the log matched an ip addy of a
visitor to my website two weeks later. This person told me they just
couldn't resist coming. Whether this person really is who she claims
to be I cannot be sure. We can't even be sure that kelly's posts are
always Kelly's. The software is out there that is able to fake every
line in the header but one, and that is the server path itself. A
major part of the problem is that someone running a lone news server
on their machine can send what appears to be a post directly to
anyones computer and it will appear in the news reader as a legit post.
it isn't any wonder that Kelly is snapping at shadows, I just wish she
wouldn't snap my way.
> She is nothing
> but a trouble maker.
I'm not always certain that it's Kelly I'm posting back to, Chloe,
so I share a portion of Kelly's problem. The person doing this
has knowledge of the network underground that isn't readily available
to the public, because the software to accomplish the crap that is
being done is found in the underground only.
I do believe though, that the person doing these things is in Canada.
--
<<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>>
> > On Apr 10, 10:37 pm, "Chloe" <ch...@home.com> wrote:
> >> Why don't you find yourself a wife, and live happily ever after ;-)
> > Oh, I'm quite happy in a very long-term relationship, Rodney.
> > Gee, I thought you were going to <plonk> me. So, that lasted - what?
> > - just a few minutes?
>
> > No surprise there.
> And it sounds as if Chloe wants to marry you ??
>
> Listen Kelly, that wasn't me. Thats WAS the real Chloe,
The real Chloe is from the UK and hasn't posted since 2003. You have
borrowed Chloe's identity, Usenet email address, and turned it all
into another one of your sock-puppet identities.
> or someones
> sock, but not mine. I told you why I used a sock, and you should
> believe it. I'm not Chloe, MattBr or anyone else.
Liar. I've suspected for quite some time that you are behind a number
of socks. Some that are posting currently, some that haven't been
seen for awhile. My bet is that you are disabled or on welfare (or
something along those lines), are mostly housebound, and have nothing
better to do than spend an inordinant amount of time on the internet.
I strongly suspect that you are behind the identities of Cub Brave,
Dan Loeb, and JR Uniacke. Of course we already know you are Chloe,
Parting Company, P.C., and A Friend of Freedom. There are many
others, but it's really pointless to list them all here. Everybody
already knows you are a liar and a fraud. Well...everyone except
"Bible" Bob, John Weatherly, David Christainsen, and you.
> I simply admitted to
> that out of frustration at trying to make you understand that I'm
> not any of those.
Liar.
> Someone IS messing with us both, and I'm not behind
> it but the target of IT as YOU are.
Liar.
> If I truly knew who it was, I'd tell you JUST to get you off my back,
> and happily so.
I'm not on your back. You're not even on my last nerve at this
point. But the closer you get to it, the closer you get to having an
official complaint filed. And I will not hesitate to do it.
> I have you filtered out,
No you don't.
> not entirely as I don't trust
> you for shit,
You have nothing to fear from me - I'm not you. But because you are
who you are, it is you that should not be trusted.
> and that is why I have responded here. I won't respond
> again unless this shit keeps appearing, and yes I monitor this group
> AND others as well.
More lies. You've never killfiled me and it's doubtful you ever will.
> I have every desire to see this stop, and no reason at all to talk to
> you unless it is something like this.
Then stop. As I said before, the solution is really quite simple.
Leave me alone and I will leave you alone. But as long as you keep
this garbage up, I will continue to be in your face letting you know
that I am onto you and your games.
> Now, I would suggest that if you
> want this crap to end then disappear like I have tried to do, or learn
> to read the headers much better.
I'm reading them fine.
> And because this keeps happening you can depend on me to try and
> disappear again for good.
You've said as much numerous times. That's when you start "coming
back" with yet another sock-puppet.
> Don't look for me, and I won't look for you,
> thats probably best if you honestly want this to end.
Liar.
> Good Bye Kelly.......
Yeah, riiiiight.
Oh, and as a safety precuation - no one should click on the link that
Rodney has provided at the end of his posts lately. It is likely set
up so that he can collect IP addresses to hack into and/or scan open
ports on other computers.
Rod
No, Kelly I have more to lose than you do because I value it much higher.
>
>> Good Bye Kelly.......
>
> Yeah, riiiiight.
>
> Oh, and as a safety precuation - no one should click on the link that
> Rodney has provided at the end of his posts lately. It is likely set
> up so that he can collect IP addresses to hack into and/or scan open
> ports on other computers.
I retained that address to try and find who has been doing this,
I have nothing to gain by hacking anyone and everything to gain
by sharing the things that I love.
But when they get there they find art instead. You know, dealing with
you isn't fun but I;ll get thru it..
The thing is this, I don't want your groundless fears of me to ruin
my chances at showing my art, but you're making sure that happens because
you can't deal with your paranoia and hate.
But I do believe that you're out to destroy me without a valid reason
and I won't stand by and let you do that. I suggest that you go to
the police in your home town and show them this post and YOURS.
Rod.
--
<<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>>
> No, Kelly I have more to lose than you do because I value it much higher.
If that were true, you wouldn't have been playing these games for so
long.
> I retained that address to try and find who has been doing this,
> I have nothing to gain by hacking anyone and everything to gain
> by sharing the things that I love.
You've done it and you know it. As for "sharing the things that [you]
love", you share hatred and you deranged mind in Usenet all the while
collecting information on people in order to manipulate them for your
amusement and use against them at a later date.
> But when they get there they find art instead.
They may find "art", but *you* are collecting IP addresses.
> You know, dealing with
> you isn't fun but I;ll get thru it..
Oh, give me a break.
> The thing is this, I don't want your groundless fears of me to ruin
> my chances at showing my art,
How in the world can I "ruin [you] chances at showing [your] art"???
Puhleeeze.
> but you're making sure that happens because
> you can't deal with your paranoia and hate.
Paranoid? LOL! No, not paranoid, but I do see you as definitely
volatile, possibly dangerous and certainly not all there.
> But I do believe that you're out to destroy me without a valid reason
> and I won't stand by and let you do that.
Out to "destroy" you? Hilarious. I *have* a life Rodney, and no
plans to do anything to jeopardize it. Unlike you, I have a
conscience and ethics and morals - destroying you isn't something I
have ever considered, and never will.
> I suggest that you go to
> the police in your home town and show them this post and YOURS.
No, I'm not the one who has a history with their local police
department as a whiner and crybaby who calls over every imagined wrong
done to them.
That would be you.
Rod
>
>> No, Kelly I have more to lose than you do because I value it much higher.
>
> If that were true, you wouldn't have been playing these games for so
> long.
>
>> I retained that address to try and find who has been doing this,
>> I have nothing to gain by hacking anyone and everything to gain
>> by sharing the things that I love.
>
> You've done it and you know it.
Then shut up and prove it or let it go.
> As for "sharing the things that [you]
> love", you share hatred and you deranged mind in Usenet all the while
> collecting information on people in order to manipulate them for your
> amusement and use against them at a later date.
>
>> But when they get there they find art instead.
>
> They may find "art", but *you* are collecting IP addresses.
Ever hear of a firewall log ? Have you ever read one ? Windows Xp
has a log named pfirewall.log in the windows directory. Try reading it
sometime.
>
>> You know, dealing with
>> you isn't fun but I;ll get thru it..
>
> Oh, give me a break.
I have, more than once.
>
>> The thing is this, I don't want your groundless fears of me to ruin
>> my chances at showing my art,
>
> How in the world can I "ruin [you] chances at showing [your] art"???
> Puhleeeze.
By scaring people away from the only medium I currently have
available to me by which to show it.
>
>> but you're making sure that happens because
>> you can't deal with your paranoia and hate.
>
> Paranoid? LOL! No, not paranoid, but I do see you as definitely
> volatile, possibly dangerous and certainly not all there.
yea,...paranoid. If I were as you claim I am then you shouldn't be
posting to me if you had an ounce of good sense, which you lay claim
to having but fail to demonstrate here, per your beliefs of me.
And, even IF you had good sense, I doubt your ability to use it to
full advantage ! Just look at you, claiming I'm the next John Wayne
Gacy yet taunting and lying openly ! What a fool you must be in real
life !
>
>> But I do believe that you're out to destroy me without a valid reason
>> and I won't stand by and let you do that.
>
> Out to "destroy" you? Hilarious. I *have* a life Rodney, and no
> plans to do anything to jeopardize it.
What is it you think you're doing here then, with someone you've
claimed is volatile and dangerous ? Playing tag ?
> Unlike you, I have a
> conscience and ethics and morals - destroying you isn't something I
> have ever considered, and never will.
yes, you're demonstrating your morals and conscience by making
accusations that you're really can't prove while taunting, accusing
and stalking a person you consider volatile and dangerous. How many
people with college degrees and IQ's above 30 do what you're doing
now ?
>
>> I suggest that you go to
>> the police in your home town and show them this post and YOURS.
>
> No, I'm not the one who has a history with their local police
> department as a whiner and crybaby who calls over every imagined wrong
> done to them.
>
> That would be you.
I believe that Officer Stump may have something he would like to say
to you about your claim of having obtained police information on me,
since a private citizens are never given access to it and he told me
exactly what he said to you...
Didn't your parents ever teach you not to barter with things that you
don't have ?
Truthfully I had hoped you would respond differently and this could be
worked out. I am very disappointed, but nonetheless.....
Good day Madam......
plonk, without further hope...
--
<<<~[A John 3:16 Whosoever]~>>>
> Then shut up and prove it or let it go.
No.
> Ever hear of a firewall log ? Have you ever read one ? Windows Xp
> has a log named pfirewall.log in the windows directory. Try reading it
> sometime.
Oh, I have. Doesn't change the fact that you are collecting IP
addresses (and the funny thing is that you are deny now exactly that
which you have admitted previously to doing).
> > Oh, give me a break.
>
> I have, more than once.
I'm not the one who needs a break here, Rodney.
> By scaring people away from the only medium I currently have
> available to me by which to show it.
Where's my violin?
> yea
That should be "yeah", actually.
> ...paranoid. If I were as you claim I am then you shouldn't be
> posting to me if you had an ounce of good sense, which you lay claim
> to having but fail to demonstrate here, per your beliefs of me.
LOL! If you had good sense, you wouldn't have started and continued
this whole charade of yours, Rodney. Sock-puppets, scanning computers
that aren't yours, making violent threats, impersonating government
officials, using other amateur operators' call signs, lying about your
past, lying about your present, lying, lying, lying...
The list goes on (as you know).
> And, even IF you had good sense, I doubt your ability to use it to
> full advantage ! Just look at you, claiming I'm the next John Wayne
> Gacy yet taunting and lying openly !
Never said anything of the sort. Why do you exaggerate so much? You
know...Weatherly is an exaggerator just like you, Rodney. Taunting?
Nah. Lying? Not once.
> What a fool you must be in real
> life !
Pretty smart and fairly wise, actually.
> What is it you think you're doing here then, with someone you've
> claimed is volatile and dangerous ? Playing tag ?
You can't figure it out?
> yes, you're demonstrating your morals and conscience by making
> accusations that you're really can't prove while taunting,
"Taunting"? Hardly.
> accusing
Accusing with good reason.
> and stalking a person you consider volatile and dangerous.
I'm not stalking you, Rodney. You can keep repeating it, but it still
won't be true.
> How many
> people with college degrees and IQ's above 30 do what you're doing
> now ?
What? Writing to someone in Usenet? Plenty, I'd imagine.
> I believe that Officer Stump
Well, at least you know his name now.
> may have something he would like to say
> to you about your claim of having obtained police information on me,
I never claimed that I had "obtained police information" on you,
Rodney. You're exaggerating again.
> since a private citizens are never given access to it
Wrong. Public record is public record.
> and he told me
> exactly what he said to you...
Really? Do tell.
> Truthfully I had hoped you would respond differently and this could be
> worked out. I am very disappointed, but nonetheless.....
Nobody's forcing you to respond to me, Rodney.
> plonk
Time will tell.
Rod
>
>> Then shut up and prove it or let it go.
>
> No.
No, you can't do it..much as I suspected..you're just hot air and
nothing more...
>
>> Ever hear of a firewall log ? Have you ever read one ? Windows Xp
>> has a log named pfirewall.log in the windows directory. Try reading it
>> sometime.
>
> Oh, I have. Doesn't change the fact that you are collecting IP
> addresses (and the funny thing is that you are deny now exactly that
> which you have admitted previously to doing).
I'm denying doing it with intention of hacking those addresses
because it is a lie.
>
>>> Oh, give me a break.
>> I have, more than once.
>
> I'm not the one who needs a break here, Rodney.
But you do more than you know.
>
>> By scaring people away from the only medium I currently have
>> available to me by which to show it.
>
> Where's my violin?
In your arse with everything else.
>
>> yea
>
> That should be "yeah", actually.
Yeah...happy now ?
>
>> ...paranoid. If I were as you claim I am then you shouldn't be
>> posting to me if you had an ounce of good sense, which you lay claim
>> to having but fail to demonstrate here, per your beliefs of me.
>
> LOL! If you had good sense, you wouldn't have started and continued
> this whole charade of yours, Rodney. Sock-puppets, scanning computers
> that aren't yours, making violent threats, impersonating government
> officials, using other amateur operators' call signs, lying about your
> past, lying about your present, lying, lying, lying...
You fool ! You've accused more than a dozen people of being me to
the point that the only one you haven't accused yet of being me
IS me ! You are a complete fucking obsessed idiot, no wonder you're
stressed about not being able to remember your lines tonight !
>
> The list goes on (as you know).
Your list is much longer than mine is, nutcase.......
>
>> And, even IF you had good sense, I doubt your ability to use it to
>> full advantage ! Just look at you, claiming I'm the next John Wayne
>> Gacy yet taunting and lying openly !
>
> Never said anything of the sort.
It's a metaphor...you know...one of those things you're supposed to
know in college ?? How many degrees have you earned now in 3 years
time ? 5, 6 maybe ? And your experience in psychology...did your
instructor teach you that it's acceptable to taunt those you suspect
are mentally ill and dangerous, or did you take classes by proxy ???
> Why do you exaggerate so much?
You're just to stupid to know a metaphor when presented with one,
in the same manner that you accuse everyone but the right ones of
being my socks, you psychotic and obsessed bitch !
> You
> know...Weatherly is an exaggerator just like you, Rodney. Taunting?
> Nah. Lying? Not once.
You're correct, not once but several times while being too much of an
idiot to know it ! Thats funny to, because you try to retain grace
while looking like a complete fool to those you have accused !
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA !
>
>> What a fool you must be in real
>> life !
>
> Pretty smart and fairly wise, actually.
Yea, it's that wisdom of yours that makes you go about claiming
all these other people are my sock puppets ! You're a prize fool
Kelly, and I laugh every time I see one of your crazy rants,
like the one about Officer Stump giving you a history on me
with the Emporia P.D.. I showed that post to him by the way,
and you may call him for verification of that fact.
All in all, you have to be pretty damned stupid to lie about a police
officer or TO one as you did with Officer Stump. You certainly helped
your make a case for your side there, you fool.......
>
>> What is it you think you're doing here then, with someone you've
>> claimed is volatile and dangerous ? Playing tag ?
>
> You can't figure it out?
I'm not you. No one can know the motives of a nut better than the
nut, so again...what do you think you're doing here ?
>
>> yes, you're demonstrating your morals and conscience by making
>> accusations that you're really can't prove while taunting,
>
> "Taunting"? Hardly.
Lying is more accurate in your case....
>
>> accusing
>
> Accusing with good reason.
Accusing from OCD. Your disease is doing your thinking for you.
Perhaps thats a good thing....you seem to be neglecting it.......
>
>> and stalking a person you consider volatile and dangerous.
>
> I'm not stalking you, Rodney. You can keep repeating it, but it still
> won't be true.
You denying it won't make it less true, just like your denial of your
obsession with me ! Deny away fruitcake, but the disease is still eating
you alive !
>
>> How many
>> people with college degrees and IQ's above 30 do what you're doing
>> now ?
>
> What?
You are really that stupid, aren't you !!!!
>
>> I believe that Officer Stump
>
> Well, at least you know his name now.
>
>> may have something he would like to say
>> to you about your claim of having obtained police information on me,
>
> I never claimed that I had "obtained police information" on you,
> Rodney. You're exaggerating again.
No I'm not, nor does the police department. if you doubt that then
call them, you know the number....
>
>> since a private citizens are never given access to it
>
> Wrong. Public record is public record.
Not in the case of records that don't exist, but you know that
already don't you.......
>
>> and he told me
>> exactly what he said to you...
>
> Really? Do tell.
>
>> Truthfully I had hoped you would respond differently and this could be
>> worked out. I am very disappointed, but nonetheless.....
>
> Nobody's forcing you to respond to me, Rodney.
And no one is forcing you to lie about me Kelly or stalk me about the
groups. Your obsession with me is sick, Kelly get some help.
>
>> plonk
>
> Time will tell.
yes it will. I have you kill filed in the other group but not in this
group.
Rod
Chloe is correct, and besides..I've seen your recent photo. If I had
a dog that looked like that I'd shave his ass and train him to walk
backwards !!
Goodbye you obsessed and sick faggot !
<316>
> Chloe wrote:
> Chloe is correct, and besides..
Chloe is you, Rodney. I know it as sure as I know you are a liar and
a fraud.
> I've seen your recent photo. If I had
> a dog that looked like that I'd shave his ass and train him to walk
> backwards !!
Actually, it's a good photo - but not so recent, really. From last
summer to be exact. Nonetheless, it's obvious you found me on
myspace. Good thing I have it locked to those I have not approved as
friends.
> Goodbye you obsessed and sick faggot !
Just thought your new "friends" in SRQ would be interested in seeing
this one, so I am crossposting it.
<316>
> No, you can't do it..much as I suspected..you're just hot air and
> nothing more...
Sure I can. I choose not to at this time.
> >> Ever hear of a firewall log ? Have you ever read one ? Windows Xp
> >> has a log named pfirewall.log in the windows directory. Try reading it
> >> sometime.
> > Oh, I have. Doesn't change the fact that you are collecting IP
> > addresses (and the funny thing is that you are deny now exactly that
> > which you have admitted previously to doing).
> I'm denying doing it with intention of hacking those addresses
> because it is a lie.
Ummm...I don't think so.
> >>> Oh, give me a break.
> >> I have, more than once.
> > I'm not the one who needs a break here, Rodney.
> But you do more than you know.
What? You're going to come to Seattle again next week like you said
you would do on Wednesday of this week?
> >> By scaring people away from the only medium I currently have
> >> available to me by which to show it.
> > Where's my violin?
> In your arse with everything else.
Actually, it's in the other room.
> >> yea
> > That should be "yeah", actually.
> Yeah...happy now ?
I'll be happy once you stop posting to me.
> >> ...paranoid. If I were as you claim I am then you shouldn't be
> >> posting to me if you had an ounce of good sense, which you lay claim
> >> to having but fail to demonstrate here, per your beliefs of me.
> > LOL! If you had good sense, you wouldn't have started and continued
> > this whole charade of yours, Rodney. Sock-puppets, scanning computers
> > that aren't yours, making violent threats, impersonating government
> > officials, using other amateur operators' call signs, lying about your
> > past, lying about your present, lying, lying, lying...
> You fool ! You've accused more than a dozen people of being me to
> the point that the only one you haven't accused yet of being me
> IS me !
Not, not a dozen or more. Just you - since you are those sock-puppet
posters you claim to not be..
> You are a complete fucking obsessed idiot, no wonder you're
> stressed about not being able to remember your lines tonight !
Ah, I see you've found my myspace page. Good thing I have it locked
so non-approved people can't view the whole thing. Now...let's
see...you call me obsessed, yet you are stalking me through myspace.
Yeah...it's me who's obsessed and not you.
> > The list goes on (as you know).
> Your list is much longer than mine is, nutcase.......
My list of what?
> >> And, even IF you had good sense, I doubt your ability to use it to
> >> full advantage ! Just look at you, claiming I'm the next John Wayne
> >> Gacy yet taunting and lying openly !
> > Never said anything of the sort.
> It's a metaphor...you know...one of those things you're supposed to
> know in college ??
Actually, I think that it's more like a simile than a metaphor.
> How many degrees have you earned now in 3 years
> time ? 5, 6 maybe ?
Actually, the bulk of my college education was obtained 25-30 years
ago, Rodney. I did recently take a five-credit class online, however.
> And your experience in psychology...did your
> instructor teach you that it's acceptable to taunt those you suspect
> are mentally ill and dangerous, or did you take classes by proxy ???
I have no experience in psychology, Rodney. And I've never said I
did. Just the psych 101 class I had to take nearly 30 years ago as a
requirement for my major fields of study.
> > Why do you exaggerate so much?
> You're just to stupid to know a metaphor when presented with one,
> in the same manner that you accuse everyone but the right ones of
> being my socks, you psychotic and obsessed bitch !
Again with the name calling. Not very nice for someone who's trying
to make friends with Friends.
> > You
> > know...Weatherly is an exaggerator just like you, Rodney. Taunting?
> > Nah. Lying? Not once.
> You're correct, not once but several times while being too much of an
> idiot to know it ! Thats funny to, because you try to retain grace
> while looking like a complete fool to those you have accused !
>
> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA !
Riiight...I'm pretty sure I'm not the one who is looking like a fool
right now.
> >> What a fool you must be in real
> >> life !
> > Pretty smart and fairly wise, actually.
> Yea, it's that wisdom of yours that makes you go about claiming
> all these other people are my sock puppets ! You're a prize fool
> Kelly, and I laugh every time I see one of your crazy rants,
"Rants"? No, certainly not rants. I'm pretty sure what you're doing
right now would be considered a rant, however. I'm curious...are you
a drinker of alcohol, Rodney? 'Cause it sure seems kinda like you're
drunk right now what with all of your Bwahaha's and exclamation points
and verbal abuse and profanity.
> like the one about Officer Stump giving you a history on me
> with the Emporia P.D.. I showed that post to him by the way,
> and you may call him for verification of that fact.
Show him whatever you like on me, Rodney. I've done nothing wrong -
except (in your eyes) reporting you to your local police department.
I'm fairly certain that he told again that I have done nothing wrong
and that you really need to watch your p's and q's. Is that why you
are ranting and raving and drinking so heavily tonight? Because you
called the police and they didn't take your side again?
> All in all, you have to be pretty damned stupid to lie about a police
> officer or TO one as you did with Officer Stump. You certainly helped
> your make a case for your side there, you fool.......
Except that I never lied about what Officer Stump told me, Rodney.
Nor did I lie to him.
> >> What is it you think you're doing here then, with someone you've
> >> claimed is volatile and dangerous ? Playing tag ?
> > You can't figure it out?
> I'm not you. No one can know the motives of a nut better than the
> nut, so again...what do you think you're doing here ?
No, thank goodness, you are not me (and vice-versa).
> >> yes, you're demonstrating your morals and conscience by making
> >> accusations that you're really can't prove while taunting,
> > "Taunting"? Hardly.
> Lying is more accurate in your case....
No, still haven't lied, Rodney.
> >> accusing
> > Accusing with good reason.
> Accusing from OCD. Your disease is doing your thinking for you.
> Perhaps thats a good thing....you seem to be neglecting it.......
Sorry, but other than being a little anal retentive in my work and my
music, I'm not one who could be considered having OCD, Rodney.
> >> and stalking a person you consider volatile and dangerous.
> > I'm not stalking you, Rodney. You can keep repeating it, but it still
> > won't be true.
> You denying it won't make it less true, just like your denial of your
> obsession with me ! Deny away fruitcake, but the disease is still eating
> you alive !
Sorry again. No disease here, no obsession. Is it beer or hard
liquor you like? I don't really see you as a wine drinker...
> > I never claimed that I had "obtained police information" on you,
> > Rodney. You're exaggerating again.
> No I'm not, nor does the police department. if you doubt that then
> call them, you know the number....
Yes, I do have it written down somewhere - I don't have it on speed-
dial like you do.
> >> since a private citizens are never given access to it
> > Wrong. Public record is public record.
> Not in the case of records that don't exist, but you know that
> already don't you.......
But you do have a history of sorts with them, don't you?
> >> and he told me
> >> exactly what he said to you...
> > Really? Do tell.
I notice you skipped answering the question above.
> >> Truthfully I had hoped you would respond differently and this could be
> >> worked out. I am very disappointed, but nonetheless.....
> > Nobody's forcing you to respond to me, Rodney.
> And no one is forcing you to lie about me Kelly or stalk me about the
> groups. Your obsession with me is sick, Kelly get some help.
Now, Rodney. Please try to be more honest. With yourself, if no one
else. You know that it is not me who is obsessed and you know that I
am not stalking you.
> >> plonk
> > Time will tell.
> yes it will. I have you kill filed in the other group but not in this
> group.
Another one that will now be seen by your new buddies in SRQ, so it
has been crossposted.
Falcon
wrote:
>Sorry, but other than being a little anal retentive in my work and my
>music, I'm not one who could be considered having OCD, Rodney.
Does anal retentive have a hyphen?
--
Ciao,
Falcon
<316>
> Does anal retentive have a hyphen?
I think it might be optional.
Randy �
In newsgroup "soc.religion.quaker",
Article
<8b1622bd-f05f-40b2...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>is completely up to you. Leave me alone, and I will leave you
>alone.
>
>It's really quite simple.
Kelly, do you dispute that you wrote this?
--
Have you heard Christ died for our sins, and God raised Him
from the dead? Did you know God saves you from hell and
gives you eternal life through faith in this finished work alone,
not your merits (Jn. 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:1-3; Eph. 2:8-10; 2 Thess.
1:8-9)? This is so man cannot boast, and God alone gets the
glory (Eph. 2:8-9).
______________________________________________
www.faithguard.org
www.twitter.com/faithguard
www.facebook.com/faithguard
______________________________________________