Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Let's be honest: If there's a god he would be opposed to gay marriage
3 views
Skip to first unread message
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 11:40:59 AM3/29/13
to
Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
fun and open minded.
I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
issues."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
fun and open minded.
I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
issues."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
Kitty P
Mar 29, 2013, 11:48:51 AM3/29/13
to
"His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
<thetibet...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7a6638d7-ff5c-453f...@u20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
shame to go the way of so many other Gods.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 12:38:59 PM3/29/13
to
On Mar 29, 11:48 am, "Kitty P" <kittyp2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"<thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Hey, we got to celebrate something, don't we? ;)
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"<thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 1:31:32 PM3/29/13
to
On Mar 29, 11:48 am, "Kitty P" <kittyp2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"<thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
"Atheist" is such a strong word. Not everybody is willing to "come out
of the closet" and say, "Look, mom, I'm an atheist." Modern moms are
supposed to understand, "Look, mom, I'm gay."
I wonder why the double standards...
Kitty P
Mar 29, 2013, 3:17:02 PM3/29/13
to
"His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
news:3acf0feb-6bc9-409a...@f5g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
No one likes to talk about their private parts?
Sanford Manley
Mar 29, 2013, 5:57:36 PM3/29/13
to
--
Sanford
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 11:51:26 PM3/29/13
to
On Mar 29, 5:57 pm, Sanford Manley <ansa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/2013 3:17 PM, Kitty P wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
> > <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> On 3/29/2013 3:17 PM, Kitty P wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 30, 2013, 12:25:04 PM3/30/13
to
On Mar 30, 11:22 am, Liberal Here <liberalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 11:39 am, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> of animals...including horses and (recently discovered) penguins.
>
> I'd label you "stupid" but that doesn't do ya justice.
Hey, we are not an animal. Well, we are but we have a powerful brain
to behave in a civilized way. You may argue that incest is also common
in the animal world.
How about "threesomes"? Group sex is also found in the animal world...
God is fine with incest though since Cain must have "married" a
sister.
See all the possible contradictions?
> On Mar 29, 11:39 am, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> Hmmmm, perhaps you'd care to explain homosexuality in several species
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> of animals...including horses and (recently discovered) penguins.
>
> I'd label you "stupid" but that doesn't do ya justice.
Hey, we are not an animal. Well, we are but we have a powerful brain
to behave in a civilized way. You may argue that incest is also common
in the animal world.
How about "threesomes"? Group sex is also found in the animal world...
God is fine with incest though since Cain must have "married" a
sister.
See all the possible contradictions?
x
Mar 30, 2013, 2:19:17 PM3/30/13
to
the "civilized" ways of the cultural environment of the times. it's also
got associations with very animalistic levels so there is a contradiction
there but their minds are almost necessarily evolved by being made to
think outside the box, being so outcast. i think in the old days it also
used to be a thing amongst well educated young men who probably found the
women to be typically stupid and boring, and traditions made to be broken.
i guess i feel there is an obvious kinda symmetry in males relating with
females in sex, love and marriage..something that may concern us more as
we evolve from animal instincts to civilized cultures..in the beginning..
but tradition is a mere type of OCD if they become too full of themselves.
x
Mar 30, 2013, 2:59:40 PM3/30/13
to
talking front to back (homosexuals favourite position). more sinful than
anything grotesque, in any civilizations eyes, is probably breaking a way/
pattern of how things are either meant to be or are usually done. that's
probably what peeves me most and i have OCD. then you could break that
down into entirely absurd habits of absurd cultures vs natural patterns,
neither of which are necessarily right for an individuals ways.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 30, 2013, 6:56:00 PM3/30/13
to
On Mar 30, 12:18 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
When we take clues from the animal kingdom we may learn that animals
do whatever they want, in many different ways, but there's hardly
homosexuality per se. The only animal that practices homosexuality is
the sheep. No religious connotations here. Rams ramming rams, so to
speak...
(I quote)
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it
seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting
predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of
heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can
speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[7] One species
in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of
domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males)
refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other
rams."[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_animal_world
***
If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
"she" and understand the opposite sex.
do whatever they want, in many different ways, but there's hardly
homosexuality per se. The only animal that practices homosexuality is
the sheep. No religious connotations here. Rams ramming rams, so to
speak...
(I quote)
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it
seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting
predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of
heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can
speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[7] One species
in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of
domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males)
refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other
rams."[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_animal_world
***
If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
"she" and understand the opposite sex.
x
Mar 30, 2013, 11:52:49 PM3/30/13
to
explanation of this from the bible and corresponds nicely to the fact
that females have a pair of XX chromosones and males a pair of XY
chromosones...IOW males have that which females are defined by within
themselves, there's a balance within them. we obviously do not have a
vagina but some interpret it as being lack of something (like a negative
void rather than a positive void), and we never hear about vagina envy.
the chromosone issue corresponds mainly to humans so it isn't universal.
god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who cares.....
Zero
Mar 31, 2013, 10:17:51 AM3/31/13
to
I think they are quite neat :-)
;-)
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 31, 2013, 12:07:58 PM3/31/13
to
It would save humanity a lot of trouble.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 31, 2013, 12:20:01 PM3/31/13
to
In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
Zero
Mar 31, 2013, 12:50:53 PM3/31/13
to
On 31/03/13 17:07, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
ErK! and then the human race would be extinct in about 120 years :-(
Actually I do *really* think Vagina's are quite neat, they come in all
shapes and sizes (It seems that many women are reclaiming the term CUNT
which is quite nice, descriptive, powerful and more accurate than Vagina
imo) - penises just look stupid to me fwiw ;-)
Who would ever envy a penis <ROFL> :D
;-)
Actually I do *really* think Vagina's are quite neat, they come in all
shapes and sizes (It seems that many women are reclaiming the term CUNT
which is quite nice, descriptive, powerful and more accurate than Vagina
imo) - penises just look stupid to me fwiw ;-)
Who would ever envy a penis <ROFL> :D
;-)
Zero
Mar 31, 2013, 12:52:46 PM3/31/13
to
On 31/03/13 17:20, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything. No we all came forth from the universal female CUNT
hahahahahah !
:D
Philosopher wrote:
> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
>
>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>>
>> cares.....
>>
>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>>
>> ;-)
>
> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
The "Gay Gays" <ROFL> Is that a new boy band :D :D :D
> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
>
>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>>
>> cares.....
>>
>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>>
>> ;-)
>
> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything. No we all came forth from the universal female CUNT
hahahahahah !
:D
x
Mar 31, 2013, 1:24:06 PM3/31/13
to
probably the whole fucking group. those were the days! noname liked it,
he probably lists it with his power words for offending regular people.
i used to hate the word but there are times and people appropriate for it
and can save us the energy of raising the voice or temper to make a point.
well that's one use of it but here it is rarely used to seriously insult.
there are so many layers to the word, though... actually the last time i
was genuinely insulted was by a resident here screaming i'm a rude cunt..
it was a compliment coming from the self proclaimed queen of the bitches.
x
Mar 31, 2013, 1:46:50 PM3/31/13
to
i'm not sure when we're covering up or unveiling..
Zero
Mar 31, 2013, 2:32:42 PM3/31/13
to
(I am sure we would get numerous opinions)
:D
ERk, somehow I missed the beginning of this thread....
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 31, 2013, 3:41:32 PM3/31/13
to
http://www.tocadacotia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/10-propostas-loucas-de-perfume-para-seduzir-voce-vulva-original-.jpg
The sheep herders who wrote the Bible must have found it unnecessary
after coexisting with the sheep for so long.
x
Mar 31, 2013, 4:08:57 PM3/31/13
to
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:41:32 -0700, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey,
they were confused enough by words.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 31, 2013, 4:40:43 PM3/31/13
to
metaphor for the world.
http://www.scenicreflections.com/files/Jesus%20good%20shepherd%20Wallpaper__yvt2.jpg
Their metaphors were quite practical. Not much to think.
x
Mar 31, 2013, 5:58:59 PM3/31/13
to
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:40:43 -0700, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey,
i am not good at philosophy or scripture but it is not over thinking to
wonder if there were layers of meaning meant for different audiences...
my main contamination by anything biblical beyond christmas stories was
through western occults qabalism and qabalists appeared to be, more than
anything else they applied qabalah to, students endlessly learning to
become masters of symbolism seeing god as the greatest master of the art
creating nothing less than the entire universe out of the power of words.
(the other major practice important to qabalists is magickal application)
symbols do not merely reflect things but create everything to begin with
so in that sense words and symbols are more fundamental than the meaning.
and thus the philosophers and writers elevate themselves above farm work.
thinking a lot was elevated to a mystical meditation leading to godhead..
well ...that is their hope after becoming fundamentally perplexed anyway.
wonder if there were layers of meaning meant for different audiences...
my main contamination by anything biblical beyond christmas stories was
through western occults qabalism and qabalists appeared to be, more than
anything else they applied qabalah to, students endlessly learning to
become masters of symbolism seeing god as the greatest master of the art
creating nothing less than the entire universe out of the power of words.
(the other major practice important to qabalists is magickal application)
symbols do not merely reflect things but create everything to begin with
so in that sense words and symbols are more fundamental than the meaning.
and thus the philosophers and writers elevate themselves above farm work.
thinking a lot was elevated to a mystical meditation leading to godhead..
well ...that is their hope after becoming fundamentally perplexed anyway.
Zero
Apr 1, 2013, 7:21:43 AM4/1/13
to
On 31/03/13 20:41, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
Nah,
Sheep herding never died out
:D
This whole sex malarkey is a quite interesting thing imo and reminds me
that I am related to a dog, a horse and some ducks that we saw yesterday
doing a 'mating dance' :D
(and, god forbid, we are probably related to Sheep too)
http://tinyurl.com/c8we3c6
:D
Sheep herding never died out
:D
This whole sex malarkey is a quite interesting thing imo and reminds me
that I am related to a dog, a horse and some ducks that we saw yesterday
doing a 'mating dance' :D
(and, god forbid, we are probably related to Sheep too)
http://tinyurl.com/c8we3c6
:D
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 1, 2013, 6:01:56 PM4/1/13
to
On Mar 31, 5:17 pm, Vinegar <kolwe...@astromail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 11:36 am, "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
I don't know, Moses may have been inclined to smoking weed or magical
mushrooms.
Is there any deed of such real estate transaction???
> On Mar 29, 11:36 am, "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> If there is a God???? You are NOT even sure that there is a mighty God
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
I don't know, Moses may have been inclined to smoking weed or magical
mushrooms.
Is there any deed of such real estate transaction???
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 1, 2013, 6:07:31 PM4/1/13
to
On Mar 31, 4:45 pm, "Chris Tolles: Evil Scumbag"
<jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey, whacko, your premises are irrational. If there is a god and
> this god made people and he made some of them gay, then why would this
> god discriminate against the gay people and not let any of them get
> married to each other?
>
> You're about as dumb an ox as any I have seen here, and I have seen a
> blue million of them.
Hey, what kind of irrational rationale is that. God created men and
some of them turned corrupt politicians, terrorists and child
molesters...
What kind of rationale is that?On Mar 31, 4:45 pm, "Chris Tolles: Evil
Scumbag" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey, whacko, your premises are irrational. If there is a god and
> this god made people and he made some of them gay, then why would this
> god discriminate against the gay people and not let any of them get
> married to each other?
>
> You're about as dumb an ox as any I have seen here, and I have seen a
> blue million of them.
Hey, what kind of irrational rationale is that. God created men and
some of them turned corrupt politicians, terrorists and child
molesters...
What kind of rationale is that?
<jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey, whacko, your premises are irrational. If there is a god and
> this god made people and he made some of them gay, then why would this
> god discriminate against the gay people and not let any of them get
> married to each other?
>
> You're about as dumb an ox as any I have seen here, and I have seen a
> blue million of them.
Hey, what kind of irrational rationale is that. God created men and
some of them turned corrupt politicians, terrorists and child
molesters...
What kind of rationale is that?On Mar 31, 4:45 pm, "Chris Tolles: Evil
Scumbag" <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey, whacko, your premises are irrational. If there is a god and
> this god made people and he made some of them gay, then why would this
> god discriminate against the gay people and not let any of them get
> married to each other?
>
> You're about as dumb an ox as any I have seen here, and I have seen a
> blue million of them.
Hey, what kind of irrational rationale is that. God created men and
some of them turned corrupt politicians, terrorists and child
molesters...
What kind of rationale is that?
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 2, 2013, 10:46:05 AM4/2/13
to
On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys) I'd
have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
excused from a perfect design.
How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
Is that an invitation to a threesome?
have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
excused from a perfect design.
How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
Is that an invitation to a threesome?
Zero
Apr 3, 2013, 7:29:31 AM4/3/13
to
On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
and check their concordance on this point :-/
Anyhow even a lot of women don't like their own body parts and thus have
them surgically modified which is a tragedy imo - viva la difference imo
- Thank Christ <chuckle> different folks go for different things - I am
sure that even "Gay Guys" (GOOD GRIEF!) have different
tastes/preferences.....
> I'd
> have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
Isn't that part of the fun?:D
>
> Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
> excused from a perfect design.
You are just being silly now :-)
>
> How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>
> Is that an invitation to a threesome?
Well you can share your fantasies right here if you want too :-)
Philosopher wrote:
> On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
>>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>>
>>> cares.....
>>
>>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
>>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>>
>>> ;-)
>>
>> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>>
>> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
Arrghhhh ! Who are these "Gay Guys" - I would like to meet all of them
> On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
>>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>>
>>> cares.....
>>
>>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
>>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>>
>>> ;-)
>>
>> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>>
>> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
and check their concordance on this point :-/
Anyhow even a lot of women don't like their own body parts and thus have
them surgically modified which is a tragedy imo - viva la difference imo
- Thank Christ <chuckle> different folks go for different things - I am
sure that even "Gay Guys" (GOOD GRIEF!) have different
tastes/preferences.....
> I'd
> have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
>
> Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
> excused from a perfect design.
>
> How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>
> Is that an invitation to a threesome?
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 3, 2013, 1:26:56 PM4/3/13
to
well now that both zero and monkey are confessed... know all about
its... that mysterious G spot... they have not been able to describe
it much less locate it and thus their knowledge of tantra is wrapped
up in their immature adolesence fantasies of being the world's...
greatest... LOVER!!! hahaha... off the top of my head.... hahaha...
check it out boys... just as there are cultures (still) that cut out
the clitoris reducing sexual congress to truely reproduction as god
intended... hahaha... but that is not why they cut it out... that, in
fact, circumsicion is the same operation. the removal of that little
button at the end of the back side just under your head... lots of
operational room to commit errors yes?... the removal also had the
extra benefit of reducing highly toxic and infectious dick cheese
cultures... and lead to the rules of moses in leviticus... plagues
gentlemen... but in more modern times with cleaning facilities in
every home and plumbed... higher degrees of hygene etc... make sex
quite safe again...
but then, it only stands to reason that, without that orgasmic button
on the penis, how does the man ejaculate to fulfill god's procreation
plan... hmmm... slide the hand down closer to the base of the penis...
right in there, somewhere on the underside is a second button which in
the male anatomy (the same as the female with the differences of
innies and outies...)... which when stimulated will produce the
necessary ejaculation. that, in the male is the "other"- spot.
thus extending our document of science to the clitoris, that button at
the top, if one starts from the inside of the vagina proper, starting
at the clitotis and working ones way in... following the road, the
nerve... one hits the G-spot which is more or less in the same place,
if it were a dick... the extra special function of that G-spot
however, in the female, acts in such a manner as to accomodate two
penis'... one in the anus reaching forward to the G-spot... and one in
the vagina providing clitorial stimulation... like any electric
current when those two buttons react orgasmically at once... but all
three? ... that would take mastery...
further, therefore, the G-spot is in the woman although some gays
suggest males have one in their ass... is that true? i don't know...
never found it... however, the G... in terms of God spot, is when a
male takes the woman's anus (a poking in the "eye" hahaha... now that
you know where the g-spot is)... where, the male entering the vagina
is now stimulating the womans clit ... G-spot and the other guys g-
spot up front... the man's "g-spot" at the just under the head of the
penis... in other words, you put on a woman and as the guy nails
her... you get to feel exactly what a woman feels... assuming perfect
meditation and form as always...
since we are on the topic of size then... has it occured to you that
size does matter? but just as a one foot hard on is a freakshow,
something to see maybe try once but fuck... so too then is a pussy
that is too huge... elephants as the good book says... the zen of it
then is such that no one ever hears about vagina envy do they? a woman
power i suppose to belittle men however i assure you... that is one
grossly massive cunt is just as devasting as having a 4 in soft and 8
inch hard which is the average normal hand for the average normal
baseball glove...
so WOMEN!... don't like sex? is it because it hurts?... too big?...
hahaha... and so you don't want it as much? hahaha.... and he does?...
hahaha... and what is that yellow chessy discharge? hahaha.... man if
you are not waking up with a smile and going to bed with a smile you
are in the wrong bed goldie locks... glad you got married first before
you knew all these things...
but in terms of finding it... it only takes fingers... not
footlongs... and the clitoris, on the top, right out there, sitting
there, pointed swollen and as eager as any cock... i mean get with the
program fags... if you are gay because you can not please a woman,
that your cock is too small and only suitable for anal congress...
under the illusion of no woman wants a little one but in her ass... it
is only a zen to understand the appeal of lesbianism... so you see,
folks... a myth... what is a little harder to hide however is why one
tit is bigger than the other and your nipples look like marty
feldman's eyes...
but in terms of effort monkey and zero... like reading the kama sutra,
or any other wiseman's book... it is the end all be all guide to sex
when in fact it is the social game of mating (hooking up) and nothing
more (try the mahanirvana)... i guess even though you pretend to know
how the clitoris at the end of the penis and hood... you seem to have
fooled yourself into believing the books of wisdom who mystically,
cunningly, slyly labelled it a "button"... perhaps if they called it a
magic lantern from which a jinn comes out you would have got it right
off but as it is...
it is much more difficult for a woman to find to guys to fulfill her
fantasy... than it is for you to find two women... culturally, women
have been getting it on since they were kids... that is their
secret... that is their power... so do the boys but it is shunned upon
and disciplined with violence... women however? encouraged...
so personally? through ritual and dildo, i have figured it all out...
in terms of shkati, i indulge every fanatasy to its fullest enjoyment
and ultimate ectasies... but that is astral... i am completely open to
sex however, but am looking for a little more than the unenlightened
fail to offer... intimacy is built in time and trust... and women can
not offer that... never could it seems... i used to swell up my ex
with gay and lesbian stories and at the first sign of... i fucked my
life... she used that as a social network persecution... and for the
little Jews like that daniel fag... it is just a game... but unlike
material gain... can't take it with you... that, sexual spirituality
does...
you see, in spite of all the dirty bird talk... i never acted on
anything... foreplay... and when it comes to the difficulty of having
sex with another man... even just for the experience... kissing and
inimacy is a hard reality to swallow and deserves a lot of laughter...
if only there was an easier way... but in the end, gentlemen, it is a
matter of opportunity... isn't it always? given the right magickal
stage i would settle back and enjoy myself...
but i doubt that will ever happen... you see... just like the use of
dirty bird talk... you all believe i belong to some dark cult of evil
and as such have participated in unspeakable rituals and ceremonies...
hahaha... so even when, since their are those of women who claim to
have no ego, no scrupples, no inhibitions, are free temple protitutes
adandoning your body to pleasure all creatures... etc... there is
still something "right" about it, you and me that prevents you from
seducing me... is it the fame? the power? the friends i run with?...
or are you just talk as in fact, you allow others to form your
opinions and dictate your actions... so whatever the word is you use
for it Goddess... you are pathetic, weak, and a sheep... hardly the
dark lady of the Light i know...
i bet being about sex you read it all... did you read the one about
the mistake a woman made one day by washing the dog the same time as
she took a bath? hot... i would have loved to walk in on that one in a
hotly intimate relationship... sprong... eh? huh? HUH?
(no not me... you...)
Lucifer
its... that mysterious G spot... they have not been able to describe
it much less locate it and thus their knowledge of tantra is wrapped
up in their immature adolesence fantasies of being the world's...
greatest... LOVER!!! hahaha... off the top of my head.... hahaha...
check it out boys... just as there are cultures (still) that cut out
the clitoris reducing sexual congress to truely reproduction as god
intended... hahaha... but that is not why they cut it out... that, in
fact, circumsicion is the same operation. the removal of that little
button at the end of the back side just under your head... lots of
operational room to commit errors yes?... the removal also had the
extra benefit of reducing highly toxic and infectious dick cheese
cultures... and lead to the rules of moses in leviticus... plagues
gentlemen... but in more modern times with cleaning facilities in
every home and plumbed... higher degrees of hygene etc... make sex
quite safe again...
but then, it only stands to reason that, without that orgasmic button
on the penis, how does the man ejaculate to fulfill god's procreation
plan... hmmm... slide the hand down closer to the base of the penis...
right in there, somewhere on the underside is a second button which in
the male anatomy (the same as the female with the differences of
innies and outies...)... which when stimulated will produce the
necessary ejaculation. that, in the male is the "other"- spot.
thus extending our document of science to the clitoris, that button at
the top, if one starts from the inside of the vagina proper, starting
at the clitotis and working ones way in... following the road, the
nerve... one hits the G-spot which is more or less in the same place,
if it were a dick... the extra special function of that G-spot
however, in the female, acts in such a manner as to accomodate two
penis'... one in the anus reaching forward to the G-spot... and one in
the vagina providing clitorial stimulation... like any electric
current when those two buttons react orgasmically at once... but all
three? ... that would take mastery...
further, therefore, the G-spot is in the woman although some gays
suggest males have one in their ass... is that true? i don't know...
never found it... however, the G... in terms of God spot, is when a
male takes the woman's anus (a poking in the "eye" hahaha... now that
you know where the g-spot is)... where, the male entering the vagina
is now stimulating the womans clit ... G-spot and the other guys g-
spot up front... the man's "g-spot" at the just under the head of the
penis... in other words, you put on a woman and as the guy nails
her... you get to feel exactly what a woman feels... assuming perfect
meditation and form as always...
since we are on the topic of size then... has it occured to you that
size does matter? but just as a one foot hard on is a freakshow,
something to see maybe try once but fuck... so too then is a pussy
that is too huge... elephants as the good book says... the zen of it
then is such that no one ever hears about vagina envy do they? a woman
power i suppose to belittle men however i assure you... that is one
grossly massive cunt is just as devasting as having a 4 in soft and 8
inch hard which is the average normal hand for the average normal
baseball glove...
so WOMEN!... don't like sex? is it because it hurts?... too big?...
hahaha... and so you don't want it as much? hahaha.... and he does?...
hahaha... and what is that yellow chessy discharge? hahaha.... man if
you are not waking up with a smile and going to bed with a smile you
are in the wrong bed goldie locks... glad you got married first before
you knew all these things...
but in terms of finding it... it only takes fingers... not
footlongs... and the clitoris, on the top, right out there, sitting
there, pointed swollen and as eager as any cock... i mean get with the
program fags... if you are gay because you can not please a woman,
that your cock is too small and only suitable for anal congress...
under the illusion of no woman wants a little one but in her ass... it
is only a zen to understand the appeal of lesbianism... so you see,
folks... a myth... what is a little harder to hide however is why one
tit is bigger than the other and your nipples look like marty
feldman's eyes...
but in terms of effort monkey and zero... like reading the kama sutra,
or any other wiseman's book... it is the end all be all guide to sex
when in fact it is the social game of mating (hooking up) and nothing
more (try the mahanirvana)... i guess even though you pretend to know
how the clitoris at the end of the penis and hood... you seem to have
fooled yourself into believing the books of wisdom who mystically,
cunningly, slyly labelled it a "button"... perhaps if they called it a
magic lantern from which a jinn comes out you would have got it right
off but as it is...
it is much more difficult for a woman to find to guys to fulfill her
fantasy... than it is for you to find two women... culturally, women
have been getting it on since they were kids... that is their
secret... that is their power... so do the boys but it is shunned upon
and disciplined with violence... women however? encouraged...
so personally? through ritual and dildo, i have figured it all out...
in terms of shkati, i indulge every fanatasy to its fullest enjoyment
and ultimate ectasies... but that is astral... i am completely open to
sex however, but am looking for a little more than the unenlightened
fail to offer... intimacy is built in time and trust... and women can
not offer that... never could it seems... i used to swell up my ex
with gay and lesbian stories and at the first sign of... i fucked my
life... she used that as a social network persecution... and for the
little Jews like that daniel fag... it is just a game... but unlike
material gain... can't take it with you... that, sexual spirituality
does...
you see, in spite of all the dirty bird talk... i never acted on
anything... foreplay... and when it comes to the difficulty of having
sex with another man... even just for the experience... kissing and
inimacy is a hard reality to swallow and deserves a lot of laughter...
if only there was an easier way... but in the end, gentlemen, it is a
matter of opportunity... isn't it always? given the right magickal
stage i would settle back and enjoy myself...
but i doubt that will ever happen... you see... just like the use of
dirty bird talk... you all believe i belong to some dark cult of evil
and as such have participated in unspeakable rituals and ceremonies...
hahaha... so even when, since their are those of women who claim to
have no ego, no scrupples, no inhibitions, are free temple protitutes
adandoning your body to pleasure all creatures... etc... there is
still something "right" about it, you and me that prevents you from
seducing me... is it the fame? the power? the friends i run with?...
or are you just talk as in fact, you allow others to form your
opinions and dictate your actions... so whatever the word is you use
for it Goddess... you are pathetic, weak, and a sheep... hardly the
dark lady of the Light i know...
i bet being about sex you read it all... did you read the one about
the mistake a woman made one day by washing the dog the same time as
she took a bath? hot... i would have loved to walk in on that one in a
hotly intimate relationship... sprong... eh? huh? HUH?
(no not me... you...)
Lucifer
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 3, 2013, 4:16:22 PM4/3/13
to
On Apr 2, 11:49 pm, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys) I'd
> happens to circumcised men.
>
> --
> Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0
Really? Are Jewish people desensitized? To what pain or pleasure?
I think I'm circumcised (I never worry about those issues), but I'm
far from desensitized!
> His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys) I'd
> > have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> > located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
>
> Then it would get all beat to shit and desensitized. Sort of like what
> > located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
>
> happens to circumcised men.
>
> --
> Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0
Really? Are Jewish people desensitized? To what pain or pleasure?
I think I'm circumcised (I never worry about those issues), but I'm
far from desensitized!
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 3, 2013, 4:24:19 PM4/3/13
to
Well, many women go without fun in their lives.
And they must thank God for that.
>
>
>
> > Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
> > excused from a perfect design.
>
> You are just being silly now :-)
Wait a minute, I'm serious. God must have tested his design somehow to
>
>
> > Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
> > excused from a perfect design.
>
> You are just being silly now :-)
know it works.
How about if the pleasure button turned out to produce pain?
How about the relationship between pain and pleasure, aka sado-
masochism?
>
>
>
> > How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>
> > Is that an invitation to a threesome?
>
> Well you can share your fantasies right here if you want too :-)
have thought about it.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 3, 2013, 4:44:47 PM4/3/13
to
On Apr 3, 7:29 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> > Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>> cares.....
>
> >>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>> ;-)
>
> >> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
>
> Arrghhhh ! Who are these "Gay Guys" - I would like to meet all of them
> and check their concordance on this point :-/
"What Gay Guys Think About Vaginas"
> On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> > Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>> cares.....
>
> >>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>> ;-)
>
> >> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
>
> Arrghhhh ! Who are these "Gay Guys" - I would like to meet all of them
> and check their concordance on this point :-/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd3gw3caSEk
Tim
Apr 3, 2013, 5:12:51 PM4/3/13
to
On 3 Apr, 14:16, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
and yes, they all report decreased sensitivity... but then how would
they know? hahaha... but that little clit on the underside of your
dick near the head is the same thing... and it is the more sensitive
of the two... you dirty monkey... the addition of anal stimulous adds
and enhances the orgasm but is not the point...
hey! speaking of scores... it is all in how you add it up... the
personal game of fucking up a life of a Devil must be really awesome
when you consider that the riches best off province in Canada is
ripping off its poor and disabled... i did mention i have a program to
cash in on all that federal skills money right? us and/or canada... of
course you are going to have to ask for help... hahaha... pride before
the fall as yes, you know me by know, i will be glad to share it
freely when it is too late... anyway, think of the money the province/
state is saving by not paying what it is obligated to pay... vs... the
millions i am costing...
$985/month vs... how much was keystone worth brad? and potash? and
crops? and you do not have a plan...
sorry monkey, mixing business with pleasure...
speaking of points... since we all understand the tree of life now,
and what is mean by each sphere having a tree of its own which is
levels of knowledge, alphabet, things you need to set out on your own,
astrology, mysteries etc... did you know that the kundalini experience
is, on that the tantric level, is the orgasm?... and that the alledged
three and a half coiled snake is not enlightenment in its latent
potential but in fact... measure the spine from tip to where it
connects with the skull at birth... now the mature body? i know...
three and a half times...
a show of all you kundalini yoga know it alls please?
Lucifer
Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0
>
> Really? Are Jewish people desensitized? To what pain or pleasure?
>
> I think I'm circumcised (I never worry about those issues), but I'm
> far from desensitized!
i have seen a documentry or two about men that wish they had a choice
> > Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0
>
> Really? Are Jewish people desensitized? To what pain or pleasure?
>
> I think I'm circumcised (I never worry about those issues), but I'm
> far from desensitized!
and yes, they all report decreased sensitivity... but then how would
they know? hahaha... but that little clit on the underside of your
dick near the head is the same thing... and it is the more sensitive
of the two... you dirty monkey... the addition of anal stimulous adds
and enhances the orgasm but is not the point...
hey! speaking of scores... it is all in how you add it up... the
personal game of fucking up a life of a Devil must be really awesome
when you consider that the riches best off province in Canada is
ripping off its poor and disabled... i did mention i have a program to
cash in on all that federal skills money right? us and/or canada... of
course you are going to have to ask for help... hahaha... pride before
the fall as yes, you know me by know, i will be glad to share it
freely when it is too late... anyway, think of the money the province/
state is saving by not paying what it is obligated to pay... vs... the
millions i am costing...
$985/month vs... how much was keystone worth brad? and potash? and
crops? and you do not have a plan...
sorry monkey, mixing business with pleasure...
speaking of points... since we all understand the tree of life now,
and what is mean by each sphere having a tree of its own which is
levels of knowledge, alphabet, things you need to set out on your own,
astrology, mysteries etc... did you know that the kundalini experience
is, on that the tantric level, is the orgasm?... and that the alledged
three and a half coiled snake is not enlightenment in its latent
potential but in fact... measure the spine from tip to where it
connects with the skull at birth... now the mature body? i know...
three and a half times...
a show of all you kundalini yoga know it alls please?
Lucifer
Zero
Apr 4, 2013, 10:31:06 AM4/4/13
to
On 03/04/13 21:44, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
"Thank you vaginas!"
ROFL
:D
:D
:D
ROFL
:D
:D
:D
x
Apr 4, 2013, 10:57:14 AM4/4/13
to
Zero
Apr 4, 2013, 11:02:33 AM4/4/13
to
On 03/04/13 21:24, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
Sex is complicated!
My theory on S&M is that it is all about 'yielding' i.e. 'giving up
power' in other words to COPULATE somebody has to, at least,
temporarily. 'give-up' , power , and obviously, to 'penetrate' somebody
has to, at least temporarily, go a bit 'wild', 'dominant' (Monkey style
<chuckles>) to get off... So to be 'submissive' in certain situations
can be quite seductive, as it can to be 'powerful'. Imo all this gets
symbolised, imprinted and mashed up with all the other developmental
stuff (Mums clomping around in heels when babies crawl around the floor
for example?) and out pops S&M along with all the other paraphillias and
as long as everybody is having a good time, and nobody is getting
exploited then good for them imo :-) :-) :-)
From what I know 99% of S&M seems more about role plays and fantasy
powerplays all about yielding, giving up power in one way or another.
The 'pain' bit is more about endorphins and stuff.. Sex/pain/life/death
a complex matrix... From what I know only a small percentage of S&M
could be considered to be physically harmful in anyway and then of
course you would be phasing into the area of 'self harm' or some kind of
exploitation....
I think the watch words for S&M are stay "Safe", "Sane" and "Consensual"
Of course it can occasionally go off the rails... and I don't know the
stats but I guess guys can die from straight sex (Burst blood vessels?)
And every year or so we here of some poor guy dies from auto-erotic
asphyxiation or something....
Sometimes I think I am more closely related to a Bonobo than a
Homosapian :D :D :D
Be careful out there...
(But have fun!!!)
And women's fantasies put men's to shame :-0
The above are only my thoughts fwiw ... I am no expert?
Are there any experts in this little discussed area ???
Actually I came across a guy on the net called "Dan Savage" who seems to
be rather an expert in these areas and I really rate him :-)
"Betty Dodson" is an expert in Vaginas :D
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>>
>>> Is that an invitation to a threesome?
>>
>> Well you can share your fantasies right here if you want too :-)
>
> The one about two girls? Who doesn't have that one. Even the Pope must
> have thought about it.
>
Hopefully "in a good way" ;-)
Don't talk to me about all those horrible thing exploitative sex things
that Catholic priests got up to ... :-(
My theory on S&M is that it is all about 'yielding' i.e. 'giving up
power' in other words to COPULATE somebody has to, at least,
temporarily. 'give-up' , power , and obviously, to 'penetrate' somebody
has to, at least temporarily, go a bit 'wild', 'dominant' (Monkey style
<chuckles>) to get off... So to be 'submissive' in certain situations
can be quite seductive, as it can to be 'powerful'. Imo all this gets
symbolised, imprinted and mashed up with all the other developmental
stuff (Mums clomping around in heels when babies crawl around the floor
for example?) and out pops S&M along with all the other paraphillias and
as long as everybody is having a good time, and nobody is getting
exploited then good for them imo :-) :-) :-)
From what I know 99% of S&M seems more about role plays and fantasy
powerplays all about yielding, giving up power in one way or another.
The 'pain' bit is more about endorphins and stuff.. Sex/pain/life/death
a complex matrix... From what I know only a small percentage of S&M
could be considered to be physically harmful in anyway and then of
course you would be phasing into the area of 'self harm' or some kind of
exploitation....
I think the watch words for S&M are stay "Safe", "Sane" and "Consensual"
Of course it can occasionally go off the rails... and I don't know the
stats but I guess guys can die from straight sex (Burst blood vessels?)
And every year or so we here of some poor guy dies from auto-erotic
asphyxiation or something....
Sometimes I think I am more closely related to a Bonobo than a
Homosapian :D :D :D
Be careful out there...
(But have fun!!!)
And women's fantasies put men's to shame :-0
The above are only my thoughts fwiw ... I am no expert?
Are there any experts in this little discussed area ???
Actually I came across a guy on the net called "Dan Savage" who seems to
be rather an expert in these areas and I really rate him :-)
"Betty Dodson" is an expert in Vaginas :D
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>>
>>> Is that an invitation to a threesome?
>>
>> Well you can share your fantasies right here if you want too :-)
>
> The one about two girls? Who doesn't have that one. Even the Pope must
> have thought about it.
>
Don't talk to me about all those horrible thing exploitative sex things
that Catholic priests got up to ... :-(
Zero
Apr 4, 2013, 11:09:09 AM4/4/13
to
Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
?
Zero
Apr 4, 2013, 11:58:09 AM4/4/13
to
On 04/04/13 16:02, Zero wrote:
>
> Actually I came across a guy on the net called "Dan Savage" who seems to
> be rather an expert in these areas and I really rate him :-)
Yes usually he is Brill, but I just had a look and he seems a little
>
> Actually I came across a guy on the net called "Dan Savage" who seems to
> be rather an expert in these areas and I really rate him :-)
"off" this week....
Maybe something to do with his husband and the "moustache" :-0
> "Betty Dodson" is an expert in Vaginas :D
:D
Tim
Apr 4, 2013, 12:39:31 PM4/4/13
to
On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> My GOD
>
> Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> ?
hit it and know.
>
> My GOD
>
> Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> ?
that is what my ex gave up chasing her dream... the big O... every
time... twice a day... sensusal, sexy, sexual, deviant and...
explosive... multiples... the tantra, which obviously everyone knows
so much about... the words... hahaha... is simple... longevity... that
is what i really means monkey... a three day fuck fest begins... but
you know this and i am trying to cover things that you do not know...
the first orgasm is purely mental... the second, a matter of
masterbation highened by a sense of voyeurism... the third? get that
first fuck out of the way... and then... wow. that is the first night
monkey... two more to fill in which exceed physical and snakes its way
into spiritual copulation... then the thrid day it is purely mental
again... like a hard pinch creating a bruise that will force her to
crunge in pangs of pain... while at work... and the correspondence was
last weekend... when i used that energy to kill... succubus or is it
incubus... i really need to know... because...
the word God however, is like M in M theory... but if you know how to
do it to her, to hit that spot... she will be a fool to let you go
since everytime, twice a day, earth shaking and shattering orgasms...
or under box number two... but you will have to talk to jacquie about
that...
the tantra here then becomes the ability so separate consciousness
from the shiva force and the shakti field then objectively transmute
them into a pure mental orasm which becomes the character in the dream
that.... and it manifests in the rose.
here is the formula... IHVH... the formula of the tetragrammaton...
blah and blah make blah... but then there is the daughter... the...
when i say red you think... <is the daughter>... you must get into the
higher states by first face, purging, destroying your own obstacles of
karma... thus, when a Devil of Light comes along, on the very, very,
extremely rare chance you should meet one, when he says : truth...
which penetrates the veil, kills the ignorance... and releases the
daughter of err through the mechanism of action... action to action...
i become your world... so in effect, since this media is so open to
perception, state and translation... it really was the best place to
get it started...
but in real life... face to face... my power in your shakti bitch...
now, please, things are getting testy... i have already located a few
fringe gamers on the edge of real satanic exploration... they simply
need a guide connie and jenna... the work is already done... it, and
you, are already set up... i am told that the Catholics, as well as
just simple common reason, suggests that to willfully commit suicide
is a grave, grave sin of which even the church can not save you...
... there is the trigger you Jew whores... you need only die once to
see what i can see... which unites with what i have shared with you
before in your first life... creating... and executing...
what.
Lucifer
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 12:37:45 PM4/5/13
to
the first paragraph and then I try to look for key words. As usual the
word "Jew" pops up in your comments. Is there a sexual fantasy to it?
Something like a Jewish woman removing her wig and going wild like a
monkey?
I really stopped going wild in a howling or athletic way. Now it's
just nice soft Tantra --the TibetanMonkey way. It's a crescendo with
hands free to explore those spots so well hidden by God. It's the
monkey way as well. The "missionary position" is out, meaning I have
developed my own style.
I may as well have unleashed the energy of the Universe, same energy
only God is thought to posses. God as engineer seems to be as smart as
the engineers who design bike lanes that don't connect. In other
words, he's an idiot. I mean the dots are not connected and then a
clever monkey comes along...
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 5, 2013, 12:51:20 PM4/5/13
to
On 5 Apr, 10:37, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
hahaha... hey monkey.. i rarely get passed your subject... and only
read to laugh at you because that is what monkeys are good for..
entertaining me...
Lucifer
Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
hahaha... hey monkey.. i rarely get passed your subject... and only
read to laugh at you because that is what monkeys are good for..
entertaining me...
Lucifer
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 2:00:20 PM4/5/13
to
On Apr 5, 12:51 pm, Wet Paper Bag <ultimate.henchman....@gmail.com>
wrote:
Thank you. Actually my subjects are all you need to know. They become
mottoes for the revolution.
This one is particularly important: God doesn't care about gays, women
or anything. Now we are free to do what we want.
wrote:
mottoes for the revolution.
This one is particularly important: God doesn't care about gays, women
or anything. Now we are free to do what we want.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 3:45:52 PM4/5/13
to
On Apr 5, 2:40 pm, Earle Jones <earle.jo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> In article
> <b63ac943-e0d8-43f1-9d5f-6c43dfb45...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
> No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
> Ernst Gräfenberg, the physician who dreamed it up.)
>
> earle
> *
>
> See Wikipedia:
>
> "G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
> anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
> instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
> precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
> examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
> is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
> of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
> of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
> consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
> weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
> receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
> for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
> vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
> gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
> is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
> sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
> is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
> branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
> innervation of neurons."
It may argued though that the g-spot is as imaginary as God...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9026947/Female-G-spot-may-not-exist.html
I don't look for it anymore. Another distraction from reality. Women
want men that act like a monkey, but not in the howling sense. They
want hand action, sensitive hands that only a monkey possesses.
"monkeys, and especially apes, resemble us most closely in the hand
and arm..."
http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S350.htm
***
God may have made a clumsy job by hiding the "pleasure button," but it
takes a curious monkey to find it.
> In article
> <b63ac943-e0d8-43f1-9d5f-6c43dfb45...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
>
> <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > My GOD
>
> > > > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> *
> <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > My GOD
>
> > > > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
> Ernst Gräfenberg, the physician who dreamed it up.)
>
> earle
> *
>
> See Wikipedia:
>
> "G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
> anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
> instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
> precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
> examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
> is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
> of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
> of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
> consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
> weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
> receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
> for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
> vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
> gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
> is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
> sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
> is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
> branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
> innervation of neurons."
It may argued though that the g-spot is as imaginary as God...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9026947/Female-G-spot-may-not-exist.html
I don't look for it anymore. Another distraction from reality. Women
want men that act like a monkey, but not in the howling sense. They
want hand action, sensitive hands that only a monkey possesses.
"monkeys, and especially apes, resemble us most closely in the hand
and arm..."
http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S350.htm
***
God may have made a clumsy job by hiding the "pleasure button," but it
takes a curious monkey to find it.
Tim
Apr 7, 2013, 6:14:21 PM4/7/13
to
On 5 Apr, 12:00, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
mind... send all the light left... or right, as you prefer...
> This one is particularly important: God doesn't care about gays, women
> or anything. Now we are free to do what we want.
monkey. it has always been this way. and then came those fucking
lobbiests... and their violence. remember the good old days? when the
elders knew as they do when to leave, to go away and curl up in a
handful of spirit...
see what i did there monkey... all the way around dushbag... yeah...
hahha... i just took your head buddha... you are dead.
Tim
Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you. Actually my subjects are all you need to know. They become
> mottoes for the revolution.
you are a lighthouse monkey... revolution is exactly what i had in
> Thank you. Actually my subjects are all you need to know. They become
> mottoes for the revolution.
mind... send all the light left... or right, as you prefer...
> This one is particularly important: God doesn't care about gays, women
> or anything. Now we are free to do what we want.
lobbiests... and their violence. remember the good old days? when the
elders knew as they do when to leave, to go away and curl up in a
handful of spirit...
see what i did there monkey... all the way around dushbag... yeah...
hahha... i just took your head buddha... you are dead.
Tim
Peter Olcott
Apr 21, 2013, 9:25:28 AM4/21/13
to
On 3/29/2013 10:40 AM, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
All conceptions of God are misconceptions.
I forgot exactly how Tang put it, I will attempt to provide his words:
Whatever you think it is, it is not that.
The truth can not possibly be provided, it can only be pointed at.
Philosopher wrote:
> Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> fun and open minded.
>
> I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> issues."
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> fun and open minded.
>
> I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> issues."
>
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
All conceptions of God are misconceptions.
I forgot exactly how Tang put it, I will attempt to provide his words:
Whatever you think it is, it is not that.
The truth can not possibly be provided, it can only be pointed at.
i2i
Apr 21, 2013, 10:51:21 AM4/21/13
to
"Peter Olcott" wrote in message
news:19GdnUdroZJXde7M...@giganews.com...
the reason they say that is because _it_is
beyond thinkingness, _it_ is beyond feelingness
and is closer to a type of intuitive apperception
but even that begs the limits of conceptual
perception and doesn't do _it_ justice. if you
ever do stumble upon _it_, you will laugh at
your previous ideas, concepts and perceptions
of _it_ .
Peter Olcott
Apr 22, 2013, 7:06:49 AM4/22/13
to
It might be more along the lines that God would fail to agree that
thinkingness is beingness.
It seems to me that when Christ said {do not judge}, he was intending
the Zen Buddhist meaning of this phrase. Sort of a {do not form
divisions within the mind}.
{:-])))
Apr 22, 2013, 9:04:50 AM4/22/13
to
Do not divide, lest thee be divided.
Do not discriminate,
lest that mind destroy one's unity.
Matthew 6, particularly verse 22,
might speak to a singularity.
Interpreting a body,
be it of work, of play, of scripture, et al
in terms of some other body, already
there are more than one.
Putting the pieces back together,
solving a puzzle, being complete, at times
a picture perfect world is viewed.
For an instant.
Fleeting, it sails.
Now, one is at sea.
At present, one returns.
The gift unfolds
of its own accord.
- thanks
Peter Olcott
Apr 22, 2013, 9:52:56 AM4/22/13
to
That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee,
that they also may be one in us
Tim
Apr 22, 2013, 11:38:10 AM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 07:52, Peter Olcott <OCR4Screen> wrote:
holy shit peter first post back and stupid right off the bat...
if there was a god he would have his own sexual nature and
preference... i do not know why people like anchovies in their
pizza... but i don't...
Lucifer
holy shit peter first post back and stupid right off the bat...
if there was a god he would have his own sexual nature and
preference... i do not know why people like anchovies in their
pizza... but i don't...
Lucifer
Peter Olcott
Apr 22, 2013, 12:16:53 PM4/22/13
to
ones that fail to quote the context to which they are replying. I think
that this issue arises because these sort of people are so dishonest
that they even lie to themselves, and are unaware of this self-deception.
As far as I can tell your reply has nothing to do with what I said, and
that is very likely because you did not even bother to read what I said,
before "replying" to what you thought that I meant.
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 1:08:36 PM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 10:16, Peter Olcott <OCR4Screen> wrote:
> I seems to me that the most dishonest types of people tend to be the
> ones that fail to quote the context to which they are replying. I think
> that this issue arises because these sort of people are so dishonest
> that they even lie to themselves, and are unaware of this self-deception.
it is good to see you have finally come full circle peter... perhaps
> I seems to me that the most dishonest types of people tend to be the
> ones that fail to quote the context to which they are replying. I think
> that this issue arises because these sort of people are so dishonest
> that they even lie to themselves, and are unaware of this self-deception.
then you are capable of learning... so why don't we take it back a
couple of years and start again shall we? or do you plan or have you
found a way to replace what you have taken from me proving once and
for all that, as our savior elect, that in fact, things that can not
be replaced are such, not subject to the rule of duality... and that
is the Law... and in there is everything you need to know...
> As far as I can tell your reply has nothing to do with what I said, and
> that is very likely because you did not even bother to read what I said,
> before "replying" to what you thought that I meant.
through...
Lucifer
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 1:11:38 PM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 07:52, Peter Olcott <OCR4Screen> wrote:
> That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee,
> that they also may be one in us
for the rest of the group i now stand humbled by the "head master"...
> that they also may be one in us
was this not your conext regarding sexuality being that the subject is
"let's be honest... if there is a god he woul dbe opposed to gay
marriage..."?
Lucifer
Peter Olcott
Apr 22, 2013, 1:11:47 PM4/22/13
to
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 1:13:56 PM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 11:11, Peter Olcott <OCR4Screen> wrote:
> Go back and read it this time.
check your header asshole... i, unlike you accept the rebuke, but do
> Go back and read it this time.
not glorify myself in failure...
Lucifer
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 1:18:16 PM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 11:13, Wet Paper Bag <ultimate.henchman....@gmail.com>
wrote:
i know what they are going to do before you do it... i have already
consumed your soul... at least i give you your portion of doubt... the
only rewrad you can get from me... we talked about this last week...
guess you were absent...
Jesus Christ
wrote:
consumed your soul... at least i give you your portion of doubt... the
only rewrad you can get from me... we talked about this last week...
guess you were absent...
Jesus Christ
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 1:40:56 PM4/22/13
to
On 21 Apr, 07:25, Peter Olcott <OCR4Screen> wrote:
> All conceptions of God are misconceptions.
nihilism... we covered this... where does the question come from? how
> All conceptions of God are misconceptions.
can you say with certainty you first life fruit fly that at the point
of death, there is obsolution and annhilation of the self when it is
in fact this self that is in unity, the very self we all are? in other
words, two scientists want to explore death. i will go first one
says... so in fact, in order to claim a truth, does not the second
gent also have to die in order to get a and b on the same side of the
equation? then we could say. this is what it is... conception,
misconception? that is a duality... where did God come from? where is
the question? and why is it your goal? what a waste.
so then why do you all spend so much time saying a monk is this and
thus he is not a monk... or perhaps, there are all the qualtities of
the buddha and he has them all but one?... big boys don't cry...
> I forgot exactly how Tang put it, I will attempt to provide his words:
insults and critisms... same as me? really... where is the content?
since you are the context king of the world...
> Whatever you think it is, it is not that.
exactly what i see. you and i have a correspondence, an agreement that
the cup, whatever color it is we actually see... is red...
now i am just down right hungry...
so someone said that and it is so because it fits your current trouble
yes? sure it is... like solomon... he said 1000s of years before
Jesus.. who is also of the house of david... we all know solomons
father but what was his son's name?... any way, context being the
thing here peter... when solomon says that all wisdom is grief and all
knowledge leads to sorrow... you don't think that there was a first
life timing thing here... like a tree that bears fruit directly from
the seed... ever heard of that? no one has. i suppose you want to
argue why now but hey... whatever it takes to pass your time from here
to there.
continuing then... was he as a king saying knowldge leads to sorrow as
a bull to his people (where have i heard that story before...
lol... )... or perhaps, just maybe, as he got older and become more in
tune with the Law he realized the sorts of errors from which he could
not escape? when does Hell begin? shortly after then i am told... but
i am not dead yet... and neither was he...
> The truth can not possibly be provided, it can only be pointed at.
provide?
jump. fall. no excpetions... and now i am pointing at you... what? you
did not break the vase? who did then... huh? your sister? your
brother?... the cat...a familiar, must be witches here... but you do
not have a sister or brother or cat... huh? someone broke in tied you
to a chair, broke the vase, untied you and run away... it must be
look... over there... rope and a chair... but i was just over in the
other room... why didn't i hear anything... ohhh... i see, a mime did
it... is he still here?... can you point to him since that is the only
door out over there and no one came passed me... huh? telekenisis? a
poltregist>.. wow... tell me more...
peter, do you want me to take a baseball bat to your face... why not?
is there a truth perhaps? just one even? then, you broke the vase?...
didn't you...
Lucifer
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 1:48:43 PM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 05:06, Peter Olcott <OCR4Screen> wrote:
> To oppose requires thinking and judgement, thus forming a paradox.
hahahaha... cause and effect are a paradox now eh? a paradox is a
> To oppose requires thinking and judgement, thus forming a paradox.
logical contradiction... experience... thinking... judgement... we
have written each other before... i am remembering... you have not
changed.
> It might be more along the lines that God would fail to agree that
> thinkingness is beingness.
is being? thinking is object and consciousness?...
> It seems to me that when Christ said {do not judge}, he was intending
rampent before it hit the satge... that the discipline of non-doing is
a kettle that is set to boil and it does... every time... lao said
that the sage acts... and in the act, there is no one that can take
that act away. not one can take the credit for that act and the sage,
the act is the receiver of the reward for that action... all the rest
is falling...
> the Zen Buddhist meaning of this phrase. Sort of a {do not form
> divisions within the mind}.
chasm between you and i... perhaps he meant... no excpetions... and
that must of excited something in you to make you judge you could make
that leap... but was it technically a division...
Lucifer
x
Apr 22, 2013, 4:30:10 PM4/22/13
to
x
Apr 22, 2013, 4:40:24 PM4/22/13
to
Wet Paper Bag
Apr 22, 2013, 5:28:15 PM4/22/13
to
On 22 Apr, 14:30, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> discovering "the truth" is like undressing a scottish woman in winter.
hahahaha...
> discovering "the truth" is like undressing a scottish woman in winter.
Craig
Jun 3, 2013, 6:53:05 AM6/3/13
to
Maybe you point away.
Peter Olcott
Jun 3, 2013, 9:19:39 AM6/3/13
to
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Jun 4, 2013, 4:32:57 PM6/4/13
to
to gay marriage --unless he's gay himself.
Then our "truth" may be wrong. "Ram ramming ram" would be the norm.
What do the sheep know?
0 new messages