Alex Jones, Intelligent or Ignoramus?

[Raymond Karczewski]

Alex Jones, Intelligent or Ignoramus?

HummingBird N FreeMan wrote:

Raymond Karczewski wrote:

Following is a dialogue on my Facebook Page.

hbfm: > Anyone with discernment and internet would know he was telling
the truth, looking silly never helps, but how many IGNORANT people
BOTHER to think, why is he shouting?

rk: He is shouting because he is a bully. He uses force to intimidate
and will not allow anyone with a grasp of truth on his show. He uses
callers to launch his opinions, no more no less Listen to the sound
file and other You Tube recordings of his banning me from his show on
false pretenses, followed by a faux apology and psychological buildup
of himself. Alex Jones is a first Class Phony.

hbfm: > Thanks for your response, I am very hard of hearing so I had
to get others to listen to the recording, a transcript may be helpful
on the video of what is said... however, I understand where you are
coming from, but I do believe that this example is a poor one to back
up your argument. Alex actually sounds quite reasonable and controlled
in your example... That isn't really an example of Alex 'bullying'
somebody really... There are many more instances you could have chosen
but I see how this one is personal.

hbfm: > I have been on radio shows too, interviews and phone ins, I
have been cut off too on phone in's in far more aggressive ways than
your example. People like George Galloway, James Whale, Alan Beswick
going back a long way... (British presenters) Alex was kind here...

hbfm: > The faux apology you refer to was a demonstration of a
reasonable man in my opinion. I don't always agree with 100% Alex
Jones opinion, but I cannot think of an example right now (and don't
really need any) of something he said that wasn't true, I am not an
avid fan, but having done many years of research on the way the world
is and finding Alex Jones to be pointing out what was obvious to me
anyway, I know that the majority of what he says IS true, IS worth
getting angry about and IS worth shouting about... I think you are
seeing his apology personally to you... when actually it may or may
not be about your situation... I may see if I can find the whole show
and get the whole thing in perspective... Love Peace and Respect

hbfm: > I understand. And I do have to agree with you to a certain
extent. I wish I had known of Alex in his first year, to have seen
(Heard really) how he composed himself at that time, do you recall?
Was he softer spoken back then? His energy May truly be that of "the
antithesis of an enlightened man." but his intellect, memory and
knowledge cannot be described as that. I do wonder if the rabble
rouser aspect is from certain things or whether he always had that
attitude...

hbfm: > "bullhorning his way when simple truth cannot make its way
through the satanic conditioning of sheeple." (I did say earlier
"looking silly never helps") Is the bullhorning effective in anyway? I
am sure it is, and from the little I have learned about yourself, I
would have thought getting through the "satanic conditioning of
sheeple" would be something you would support. I respect people that
come across as humble, although softly spoken can be annoying on a
personal level because of my hearing problems and Jones Never leaves
me uncertain as to his words or meanings unlike other commentators.

hbfm: > I was just about to write to you here when I got your
notification, I wanted to ask you what date the radio show was if you
don't mind...was it late December or the 1st of January? If it was a
few days and you cannot remember exactly, do you remember his topics
or guests of that show?

hbfm: > Thank you once again for the communication..

hbfm: > Love Peace and Respect

rk: HummingBird, I was not speaking of the one incident of my being
banned only, but was making an overall observation of alex jones that
cannot be argued. His energy is the antithesis of an enlightened man.
It is rather that of a rabble rouser, one who keys negative emotions
by working a crowd into a mob, bullhorning his way when simple truth
cannot make its way through the satanic conditioning of sheeple. He
could well be likened to those inciters who worked the crowd at Jesus'
lynching. He has his place in the world of ignoramuses. Raymond
Karczewski

hbfm: > Also, what is he ignorant of? isn't it the ignorant he is
trying to reach?

rk: Intelligent men act. Ignoramuses React. Why fight when you can
just withdraw your support by peaceful BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT?

hbfm: > Raymond Karczewski "Intelligent men act. Ignoramuses React.
Why fight when you can just withdraw your support by peaceful BOYCOTT,
BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT"

hbfm: > I do understand and I am here for the debate/conversation with
an intelligent man...But doesn't evil triumph when good men do
nothing?

hbfm: > the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Apparently
Edmund Burke said this, I do not like nor condone anything that Burke
says really, but this is apt right now, Thomas Paine on the other
hand, Yes I condone almost everything he says...

hbfm: > Jones acts and Reacts, and so do we all, if we allow our
instincts of nature to enable us.

rk: HummingBird N FreeMan You'll just have to debate someone else.
Men of Truth do not debate for there is nothing to debate in truth.
There is only "WHAT IS" which is self-evident. Debate is found only in
the Satanic Idea of Truth, and there you will find many ignoramuses
who hold themselves to be enlightened for you to debate.

rk: If one studies my stand facing the Oregon and Josephine Courts
down, they will find that all I did was BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT,
their unlawful behavior. They could not elicit any consent to their
tyranny. They held my body imprisoned, but they could never touch or
incite my spirit. It was such spiritual stance which stymied the
Satanic courts. When the people come to understand the spiritual power
within them, this satanic ruled world will come to an end. SUCH IS THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT.


hbfm: > So Raymond, why are you arguing against "What is" with Alex
Jones?

rk: Why are you "picking a fight?" I have no problem with Alex Jones
or any other Ignoramus who cannot see Truth when it stares them in the
face. My messages are Truth. One can take it or leave it. The only one
who is affected by such action is them. Raymond Karczewski
20 minutes ago � Like

hbfm: > I am not picking a fight, I explained my intentions earlier,
if you do not believe me, fine. Please do not project what you think
onto my intentions. I am reading all about you at the moment, it seems
that you have written most of it so far!

rk: Hummingbird, you are a clever man, but cleverness is effective
only in the realm of ignorance. Raymond Karczewski

hbfm: > haha... how so? Only? People often suggest I am clever, but
only in the respect of their view. I often take it as a compliment but
I also often correct them.. In MY humble opinionI can only be 'clever'
If I know about something... but then, it depends on what definition
you determine clever to have, same as ignoramous, (those who do not
know)

rk: Hummingbird, you and all else who read these exchanges are privvy
to a communication they are not geared toward. Truth can only be
gained by Direct Perception, Insight, Divine Awareness. Intellectual
cogitation such as that which you are attempting to entice me with, is
Satanic argument/debate, despite what appearances it may take. That is
why I tell all they MAY TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT. One cannot make the blind
see, unless the blind are ready to see. Raymond Karczewski

hbfm: > I just checked, the american definition of clever is so
different so very different to the English....

hbfm: > Raymond... Your judgement is one of bigotry, I thought you
were the truth?

hbfm: > HummingBird is my female partner. You are speaking to FreeMan
now and have been constantly...

hbfm: > I think it is unfortunate that you are being hypocritical
here, I am not insulting you, I am seeing contradictions here that are
not inline with the things you are writing elsewhere, I have ignored
the blatant prejudice against you elsewhere on the internet, I do
TRULY, agree with a large amount of the things you are writing and
being someone that detests all prejudice and discrimination, I am
trying to have a fair communication with you, but your judgement is
"Truth can only be gained by Direct Perception, Insight, Divine
Awareness."

hbfm: > Do you have a monopoly on this? Is it possible that others can
have these qualities? Unfortunately for me and obviously very many
others you deem us unworthy. So we don't get a fair hearing, You claim
jurisdiction over my sentient being to make these judgements. You are
mistaken, there is a lot of the the things you have written that you
are not mistaken about, but here today, you are mistaken.

hbfm: > Love Peace and Respect

rk: I have, but one more thing to say. It may clarify things, it may
not. The reason you are not connecting with the direct perception of
Truth. that is seeing Truth as it unfolds in the moment, is that you
are adept at intellectual bantering with other aftermoment based
(dead) intellects and are therefore, by your own consent, a servant of
your own Satanic Intellect, not master of it.

rk: I am not singling you out. I am point to the absolute fact that
all fallen men are subject to their intellects until they awaken from
their Satanic Spell which binds them as slaves to mind controllers.
It is called being "worldly."

Raymond Ronald Karczewski� -- A Living Christ

Watch my You-Tube Videos at:
http://www.arkenterprises.com/index.html#List

Change The Quality of Your Life Today
*********************************************
Raymond Ronald Karczewski� http://www.arkenterprises.com

Change The Quality of Your Life Today
http://www.mygoldplan.com/raykar/