Oh, and Workingjoe? Don't every flame me again.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: **NEW MyRed** (non-nude) MyRedb14.jpg (1/1)
Date: 21 Mar 1999 00:48:38 GMT
From: worki...@aol.com (Workingjoe)
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
To: jes...@who.net
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.girlfriends
References: <36F31F98...@who.net>
Who the FUCK are you to tell these guys to stop? I've been downloading
the
myred series for YEARS and do not want them to stop. So fuck off.
Joe
<< Subject: Re: **NEW MyRed** (non-nude) MyRedb14.jpg (1/1)
From: jesus X <jes...@who.net>
Date: Fri, Mar 19, 1999 8:10 PM
Message-id: <36F31F98...@who.net>
Remington wrote:
>
> http://www.remage.com/
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
You have been warned several times before. This is blatant spam. Please
do not post this type of material again. Now that we have a FAQ, you are
officially violating it. This counts as a warning.
--
jesus X
[jes...@who.net.don't.even.THINK.about.spamming.me]
--- Why Read When You Can Sit And Stare At Things? ---
--- The World: It's Right Where You Want to Be. ---
>>
http://www.alltel.net/~bluephone/ar-faq.html
dave
In article <36F4A07E...@optonline.net>, dav...@optonline.net says...
>>>>>AND NOW THAT "WE" HAVE A FAQ<<<<<<< Whoeeee are'nt we the omnipotent one
>"NOW"
>
1. Go back to school and relearn contractions.
2. Lay off the caps lock, dickhead.
3. Yes, WE have a FAQ - imho, live it or get lost.
dub
In article <36f86bcb...@news.tomnet.com>, d...@auburn87.nospam.usa.net
says...
dudleydoright wrote:
>
> >>>i love it a college educated NAZI<<<<
you had to go there, didn't you?? you're nothing but a goddamn troll...
there is a very large difference between someone that upholds the rules,
and the nazis... nazis made their own rules, and then went about them
with the use of scare tactics and ABSOLUTE power... what we are trying
to do here is establish a SPAM-FREE and friendly environment, where we
can all trade pictures of redheads, and discuss topics involving
redheads, and the like... we made an FAQ so that we could have
something to use as our rules, if i remember correctly the FAQ was a
public vote, so anyone that saw the thing could do 2 things 1) read it
and suggest changes and 2) vote on whether or not to accept it...
therefore since you didn't open that mouth of yours then you have no
goddamn right to open now...
here's the link, read it again->
http://www.alltel.net/~bluephone/ar-faq.html, and maybe this time you'll
understand it...
dave
>>>>i love it a college educated NAZI<<<<
>
>
>
I prefer to think of myself as an elitist egalitarian. I also admit
to being a bigot - I thoroughly despise people who are ignorant by
choice.
Perfectly stated. And remember, it is a community effort, so feel free
do to as I am right now in the next post to him. We can all issue a
warning, as we all made the FAQ.
--
jesus X [jesusx{at}who.net] [jesusx{at}depechemode.com]
Everything not Strictly Forbidden is now Mandatory.
Think Cosmically, Act Insignificantly.
Ok, now you're pushing it. Dave posted to you the FAQ address, so that
counts as your OFFICIAL WARNING. Drop this thread.
I have been subscribing this particulare NG for quite some time now.
In that time I have been offended only twice. The first time was when
someone made a blatantly racist remarq about the skin color of the man
in one of the posts. The second time is this incessant thread.
I agree about your rights and freedom. However, manners and decorum
are a reflection of the individual. Although freedom of speach is a
fundamental right, it is against the law to yell FIRE in a theatre.
And only a fool would try to steal George Foreman's cheesburger or
make a derogatory comment about blacks in a crowded Raggae bar.
Proper decorum would prevent someone from discussing their personal
sucess in the company of unemployed people.
So far, this thread has been asking you to behave appropriately given
the audience here. You have reacted to all these comments as if they
were personal attacks. Your behaviour thus far has served only to
illustrate your lack of etiquette (or netiquette as it is called here
in cyberspace).
You will undoubtedly want to make some retaliatory remark about my
intelligence or upbringing. Please feel free to do so. I will not
retaliate. Once you have made your remark though, please be so kind
as to terminate this thread
Thanks you.
RedHead Lover
I was indeed replying to dudleydoright. I unfortunately deleted
the previous parts of this thread and lost the author's
name. That is why my reply began "Dear Sir"
My appologies if my reply seemed directed at you or anyone other
than dudleydoright
:-(
RedHead Lover
In article <36FC4FF7...@who.net>, jes...@who.net says...
> Thank you.
>
> RedHead Lover