Re: Damn drunks
Kent Paul Dolan
> "David P." <joseywa...@outlaw.nospam> wrote:
>> How are the atheist-based facilities doing around
>> there. They ain't doin' so good around here!
> Quite nicely, thanks for asking.
> Sounds like the religious programs aren't doing
> your poor friend a bit of good.
> Here are some secular programs that might help him
> that you obviously don't really want to know
> about:
> http://rational.org/
> http://secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=sos&page=index
> http://www.unhooked.com/index.htm
> http://www.smartrecovery.org/
> http://www.womenforsobriety.org/
> http://christians-in-recovery.org/links/Links/Secular/
It is always nice to see one of Pollutka's
long running skeins of lies [in this case, that
atheists are offering no help and have no groups
to offer help, to addicts] put down with a heavy
dose of those inconvenient "fact" thingies.
Thanks, Michelle.
> Will you give this information to your friend or
> will you keep it from him out of religious
> bigotry?
If he runs true to his usual and decades-long
behavior, here at least he will ignore entirely that
his lies have been countered by you, and go on
invincibly ignorant of the facts you have presented,
making no change to his false claims, nor to his
fact-deprived ignorant thinking.
Then he will evade answering the question you have
asked in any meaningful way, whether via his ritual
repetitions, segues, non sequiturs, red herrings,
shovelwarings of bulk uncomprehended stolen
intellectual property, or whatever of his usual
intellectually dishonest habits seems most
attractive to him at the moment, in his ongoing
career as an annoying twit, Usenet troll, and brain
burned drunk.
The thing he will never do is retract his years of
falsehoods on this subject.
FYI
xanthian.
[This post, though written before Pollutka's
entirely predictable response, ended up foreseeing
the past, because Google Groups would not let me
post it due to "exceeding posting limit" and
news.albasani.net was in failure mode. Sorry for the
inconvenience. Pollutka proved to be his usual jerk
self, including trimming your posting to make it
read the way he preferred it to read, another of his
frequent dishonesties. Among the options I predicted
above, he chose to remain ignorant, as you so
correctly declared to him in your response. Just FYI,
while the last site you URLed does lead to _some_
secular agencies, most of the agencies listed, even
under "secular" are instead faith based agencies. From
someone who _did_ follow your URLs (and also bookmark
them).]
Kent Paul Dolan
> "Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Why did you remove the last four words of the
>> above sentence? I put them back.
> Why are you using a phony name?
Does "outlaw josey wales" ring a bell, you
insufferable "do as I say, not as I do" butthead?
> Are you a phony?
Your baseless challenge is a non sequitur, an
evasion of you providing an answer to the correct
charge that you have (again, as always) displayed
blatant intellectual dishonesty in your Usenet
discussions.
[snip idiocy, read the original if obsessed with the
Usenet postings of Pollutka the troll; most people
have long ago killfiled him under all of his
pseudonyms]
So, if I get this right, you have retreated from the
lie that atheists provide no alcoholism treatment
support services anywhere, retreated from the lie
that there are no such centers where you live in
Chapel Hill, added a lie that their success rate,
completely unknown to you, is inferior to that of
the theism-based support services for alcoholics
(which do exactly as well as complete neglect does
at curing alcoholism), and are now proceeding to
engage in a dick size war about whether the 3% of
the population who are atheists have provided in
absolute numbers _as many_ centers local to you as
the 97% who claim to be theists have provided?
Every bone in your body is dishonest, Pollutka, I
doubt a one of them even contains calcium. Your
spine, for example, is almost certainly composed of
silly putty, and your skull, of dry rotted wood
saturated with alcohol.
xanthian.
Michelle Malkin
Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote in message
news:37555e98-59a1-4c8a...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> "(David P.)" <imb...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> "Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>> Why did you remove the last four words of the
>>> above sentence? I put them back.
>
>> Why are you using a phony name?
Sorry to disappoint you, child, but Michelle Malkin
is my real name. That fruitcake journalist got her
last name from her husband.
(David P.)
> "(David P.)" <imb...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > "Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Why did you remove the last four words of the
> >> above sentence? I put them back.
> >
> > Why are you using a phony name?
>
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
[...]
I believe in the Golden Rule in the form of the
Wiccan Rede - 'An' it hurt no one, do as you please.' -
and that when the mystical and power-seeking
aspects of nearly all religions are removed,
the Golden Rule is what is left.
.
.
--
Zeldaa Rottencrotch
Zeldaa Rottencrotch
> Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote in message
... DEUNKS R PHUNNY!!!
B
(David P.)
> Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
>
> > Every bone in your body is dishonest, I doubt
> > any of 'em contains calcium. Your spine is
> > certainly composed of silly putty, & your skull,
> > of dry rotted wood saturated with alcohol.
>
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1