Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DEMOCUNTS - Id Barack is not a MUZZY Make him prove it by eating some PORK!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

GaryRock

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 10:20:17 PM4/2/08
to
You yanks are fucked.


Ken

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 12:47:12 AM4/3/08
to
GaryRock wrote:
> You yanks are fucked.
>
>

Gary,

But what if Barack Obama won't eat pork because he is secretly an
Orthodox Jew? Wait a second. It isn't Christians or Jews or Moslems
who keep their religion secret. It is mostly just 12 Steppers who do
so. And the Ku Klux Klan, of course.

Lol!

Ken Ragge
http://www.morerevealed.com/

Old Jinglebollocks

unread,
Apr 21, 2008, 11:07:17 PM4/21/08
to

===================================================

Inspect his penis.

Ken

unread,
Apr 22, 2008, 4:09:08 AM4/22/08
to

That could also merely mean that he is American.

Old Jinglebollocks

unread,
May 9, 2008, 8:33:53 PM5/9/08
to smar...@aol.com
> That could also merely mean that he is American.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

========================================================

Yeah, I suppose so. I understand that in America, mothers are
ABSOLUTELY SCARED SHITLESS of not circumcising their sons, as they are
terrified of being out of step with the neighbours.

SO, AMERICAN MOTHERS SAY:

"BEFUCKINJAYZIZZ.... I WILL ABUSE AND TORTURE AND TORMENT MY OWN
FUCKING SON, TO MAKE SURE I AM NOT OUT OF STEP WITH THE FUCKING
NEIGHBOURS, BEJAYZIZZ............ "

Such is life in The Home of The Brave, The Land of the Free,
befuckinjayzizz.............

Ken

unread,
May 9, 2008, 9:47:20 PM5/9/08
to

Old Jinglebollocks,

I think it runs a lot deeper than merely fear of being out of step with
the neighbors and even deeper than the medical justification which used
to exist.

For a parent to start circumcising in the 40s and 50s, all it took was
medical authority telling them it was healthier and would prevent
disease. Against a cultural background of sex and body parts not being
talked about, people had nothing else to go on.

Now that the medical justification has fallen apart, parents have to
acknowledge how painful it is in order to stop it. A man who refuses to
acknowledge the loss is not going to take that loss into consideration
when it comes to his son.

Ken Ragge
http://www.morerevealed.com/

Old Jinglebollocks

unread,
May 30, 2008, 4:57:33 AM5/30/08
to
> Ken Raggehttp://www.morerevealed.com/- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

=========================================

Well that's fairly basic stuff - if we don't acknowledge our own
history, we'll tend to visit it on our children unthinkingly.
Even if we do acknowledge it, it's often a struggle to avoid recycling
it.

While on the subject of mutilation of the penis, has any survey ever
been done to find out if it's mothers or fathers who are the driving
force behind it in the absence of religious coercion?
I can only say that in the cases I know of, the mother was the
instigator.

Ken

unread,
Jun 1, 2008, 5:56:25 PM6/1/08
to

Old Jinglebollocks,

I have heard that with female genital mutilation, in the U.S. where it
is illegal, in subcultures where it is done it is the mother who insists
on it.

As far as when male circumcision is done outside of religious strictures
that it is the mother who often is the one who insists on it, that is
what I have seen too. It would be interesting to know why. I can't
imagine that _before_ it became a religious ritual or medical procedure
that a woman wouldn't go all out in defense of the child from someone
saying they were going to cut part her baby's penis off.

Ken Ragge
http://www.morerevealed.com/

Old Jinglebollocks

unread,
Jun 24, 2008, 11:33:17 AM6/24/08
to
On 1 Jun, 22:56, Ken <k...@nospam.com> wrote:
........

> >> For a parent to start circumcising in the 40s and 50s, all it took was
> >> medical authority telling them it was healthier and would prevent
> >> disease.  Against a cultural background of sex and body parts not being
> >> talked about, people had nothing else to go on.
>
> >> Now that the medical justification has fallen apart, parents have to
> >> acknowledge how painful it is in order to stop it.  A man who refuses to
> >> acknowledge the loss is not going to take that loss into consideration
> >> when it comes to his son.
>
> >> Ken Raggehttp://www.morerevealed.com/-Hide quoted text -

>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > =========================================
>
> > Well that's fairly basic stuff - if we don't acknowledge our own
> > history, we'll tend to visit it on our children unthinkingly.
> > Even if we do acknowledge it, it's often a struggle to avoid recycling
> > it.
============================================

Hmmmmm...... as we've come on to this subject....... we may as well
continue......

I was masturbating this morning, and it occurred to me to pull my
foresking down all the way..... so that the INSIDE of my foreskin
would be OUTSIDE below the head of my penis.... then I moistened my
finger with saliva and stroked the "INSIDE" of my foreskin... now
exposed below the head of my penis.......... it became clear the the
INSIDE of the foreskin is very much a part of a man's PLEASURE
FUNCTION.

When you Lady is performing fellatio on you, tell her to pull your
foreskin down all the way, so that the INSIDE of your foreskin is full
exposed to the benefits of the friction being supplied by the Lady's
lips and tongue......... it will very much enhance the intensity of
your sexual pleasure during fellatio.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To butcher a little baby boy, to deprive a male child of that part of
his pleasure function, that part of his identity, that part of his
bodily integrity.............. if my mother [so called] had done THAT
to me, I WOULD GET A BIG SHARP KNIFE FROM THE KITCHEN AND CUT OFF MY
MOTHER'S CLITORIS, and say: "You did that to me. How does it feel when
it's done to YOU, arsehole?"

0 new messages