VIRGINIA FOXX: (reflects my opinion, speculation:) SCAPEGOATER FOR POLITICAL ATTENTION (EGO) AND PROFIT? BUT ALSO HABITUATED SCAPEGOATER? WITHIN HER OWN FAMILY?
witchdoctorwithdogma
I do not know Virginia Foxx' psychological constitution in any
respect. I do not know that she was lying when addressing the
Matthew
Shepard murder in Congressional session. I do not know her feelings
toward the opposite sex. I also do not know Ann Coulter's
psychological constitution in any respect. I do not know her
feelings
toward the opposite sex.
I do not know that either suffers from any emotional or sociologic
shortcoming.
The following entirely reflects my opinion, my impression, and my
expectations both as to anything that can be taken from the following
that is explicit or implied.
for the royal treatment, see:
http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
Because the gay gene only passes maternally and the more connected
with the inquisition of gays, but also with inquisition and
scapegoating generally inasmuch as the inquisition against gays is the
forerunner to all major inquisitions, a person is the likelier they
are to harbor the gay gene (gays, esp. lesbians (gay gene only passes
maternally,) induced to marry heterosexually to avoid inquisition,) I
can only wonder if in fact Virginia Foxx harbors a gay gene on at
least one of her X chromosomes (women have 2, it known recently that
the region in which that gene resides is replete with genes that DO
NOT "CANCEL OUT.")
(Though) I've also on my website
http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
begun exploring whether religion's invention and culture of making
straight guys
afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay has interacted with
sociobiologics on
the mitochondrial level. Sociobiology (requires basic understanding
of
evolution and human genetic variation:)
Pre-menstrual syndrome, menstruation and menopause send fertile
men to fertile women for numerical genetic advantage, at this level
probably for the species as a whole. By anointing women with the
power to make men afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay has
religion bestowed a numerical genetic advantage factor to the
menopausal disposition beyond those times in the human female
reproductive processes when female behavior is designed by nature
to send men looking elsewhere?
(Why mitochondrial? Though my site is aimed at everyone, this
requires a basic understanding of the ideas offered at my site but
also a slightly deeper understanding of genetics, though still
totally at the lay person's level. You can find what tipped me off to
that inquiry in due time on my website.)
I will NOT discuss potential ramifications in turn about her
offspring.
Now it certainly at least appears (though I don't know if it's true)
that C'woman Foxx is a flaming racist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLEqHkpzdG8
THEREFORE WHAT I WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT IS, IF SHE HAS A SON,
WHETHER HER (MY ASSUMED, NOT KNOWN) ENTHUSIASM FOR ANTI-GAY
INQUISITION (INCORPORATING MAKING STRAIGHT GUYS AFRAID OF BEING
WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY) AND HER (MY ASSUMED, NOT KNOWN) RACISM
HAS MADE HER SO MUCH THE HABITUAL SCAPEGOATER WHETHER SHE SCAPEGOATS
HER OWN SON, ESPECIALLY IF SHOULD WOULD HAVE STARTED HER
(HYPOTHESIZED--ONLY MY HYPOTHETICAL (HER BEING PUBLICLY ANTAGONISTIC
OF GAYS)) HABIT BY SCAPEGOATING GUYS, BY MAKING THEM AFRAID OF BEING
WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY, OUT OF RESENTMENT
OF GUYS.
For instance (from known psych cases--my wife and I have dinner
parties with a psychiatrist and his wife) has she purposely denied him
recognition?
One can imagine, for instance, Foxx doesn't harbor a gay
gene (I cannot know one way or the other) but perhaps in youth gained
a resentment of men (actually rather than list potential shortcomings
as to her attractiveness in youth I'd add that it's partly making
straight guys afraid of
being wrongly ferreted out as gay that causes boys to
be hurtful of some girls.)
Perhaps she understands (aside from scapegoating and disinformation
promulgation being potentially very profitable) that the inquisition
against gays is all about limiting and scapegoating males generally
(even though the process causes there to be more gays and more
lesbians yet.)
This is why the religious right, the murderers of gays, etc. are
where
the gays are most concentrated (virtually all murderers of gays have
proven being conflicted gays.)
Anita Bryant attacked the gays. Then she got divorced. Then her son
said he was gay.
(DISCLAIMER: SUGGESTS RELIGIOUS PATTERN OVERALL. I DO NOT KNOW ANY
PART OF ANITA BRYANT'S PSYCHOLOGICAL OR GENETIC PROFILE. I DO NOT
KNOW
IF ANITA BRYANT'S SON'S SELF-AVOWAL OF BEING GAY WAS VALID. IF IT
WAS,
I DON'T KNOW IF HIS HOMOSEXUALITY IS HEREDITARY. THIS IS AN ACADEMIC
PRESENTATION, REFERENCES PUBLIC FACTS ABOUT PERSONS SELF-PUBLICIZED
(AND ANTAGONISTIC) AS TO THIS SUBJECT MATTER. NOTHING PROPOSED OR
IMPLIED, ACTUALLY OR PERCEIVED, IS DETERMINATIVE.)
DEMONIZING POLITICAL FOES ENTRENCHES THE DEMONIZERS.
Combined with B.S. supplied by newscasters playing amateur Himmler or
special interest group opinion influencers bent on furthering the
self-
serving dissemination of erroneous information, IT AFFORDS CORRUPTION
AND DESPOTISM.
SO McCARTHYISM WAS ABOUT CALLING LIBERALS COMMUNISTS.
Ann Coulter was quick to say she thought Al Gore seemed gay.
She
also was quick to say she thought John Edwards seemed gay.
(Link to actual reference available on my website.)
The license to scapegoat enables the scapegoating of immigrants,
whoever.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/browse_thread/thread/d13ee7fa4...
(It enables SOME women, including self-aware or not self-aware
carriers of the gay gene married
heterosexually--see on my website as to Carren Strock, "A Painful
Discovery--" to SOMETIMES scapegoat men even if only by the gleeful
contentment when their religious husbands act like clownish annoying
masculine insecure insulting paranoids.)
THE LICENSE TO SCAPEGOAT MUTATES
into making sociopathy politically acceptable, ultimately to the
point
of mass homicidal paranoia.
THE HOLOCAUST
The current day example of that mutation: Virginia Foxx.
(MY OPINION:) lying about the events leading to Mathew Shepard's
murder
(MY OPINION:) lying about her unawareness of that
(MY OPINION:) sociopathic conducted in the presence of Judy Shepard
Associating political foes with the scapegoated enables corrupt
leadership to thrive. Combined with population growth
(obvious result of making straight guys afraid of being wrongly
ferreted out as gay) ENABLED ANCIENT DESPOTS TO
RUMBLE.
IT'S THE ESSENCE TODAY OF SCAPEGOATING FOR PROFIT
AND SHELTERING CORRUPT GOVERNMENT and corrupt
supportive citizens.
However, holychanges (http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges)
really enjoys "breaking things down," such as the original purpose of
the anti-gay inquisition itself (demonizing any man potentially, as
a foe by way of association of any man with gays, just as in the
case of calling a liberal a communist.)
Arrested growth, or why punks are pushy on the road, causing
hundreds of accidents when it rains is simply:
1) accurate recognition of differences between boys and girls
2) instilling of masculine insecurity by masculine insecure annoying
clinically
sexually paranoid fathers married to mothers who are content
with that
3) concomitant inability of boys to mature from exagerating those
differences, out
of the fear of being wrongly ferreted out as gay.
The fact of behavioral differences between men and women aside,
obviously man from his earliest beginning walked long distances and
worked
intensely to catch, grow, and often cook his food.
It's prima facie an arbitrary perversion that slim men are subjected
to that inquisition;
it's a fact that they frequently are. Religious man-haters, whether
or not one of Carren
Strock's very late self-aware lesbians, and annoying, insulting
masculine insecure
paranoid religious male clowns feeling they have to conduct their
inquisition lest they
feel afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay, are not the only
offenders.
Religious perversion becomes acculturated, and so I for one actually
never take
the annoying types personally. (I actually have always struggled to
stay in shape, being
of healthy weight much the time, currently borderline.)
It's often enough for one to simply to have been born good-looking
for
a guy to become the object of the inquisition. I have zero doubt any
such guy would confirm that.
Obviously the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness does not mix
with
religion--if you're a guy.
The inquisition against the gays induced gays to marry
heterosexually.
As the gay gene only passes maternally, there are in religious
communities 3 of them per male gay, but they enjoy a holier than thou
existence as the men are the scapegoats of their own religion.
Hamer's discovery first covered in "Science," 7/16/93, and "N.Y.
Times",7/16/93, on page 1, by Natalie Angier, incl. "THE LATEST
RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE NEWLY REPORTED GENETIC FACTOR IS PASSED
THROUGH THE MATERNAL LINE, A CURIOUS TWIST GIVEN THAT IN THE PAST
PSYCHIATRY HAS HELD MAN-HATING MOTHERS AT LEAST PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR
FOSTERING
THEIR SONS' HOMOSEXUALITY."
Xq28. WOMEN CAN GET ONE OR TWO COPIES (Xq28 IS ON THE FEMALE
CHROMOSOME. MEN CAN ONLY GET ONE COPY. WOMEN ARE 3 X LIKELIER TO HAVE
AT LEAST ONE. DOUBLE X's RECENTLY FOUND IN MANY GENES TO NOT CANCEL
OUT.
THE GAY GENE ONLY PASSES MATERNALLY (same article.)
In "A Painful Discovery," Carren Strock ("Newsweek" columnist) said
most lesbians are ultra ultra late in self-awareness
(from me:) Obviously even Eleanor Roosevelt couldn't have realized it
till very late in life.
Breedlove: aside from a correlation with left-handedness, the
statistical connection between later-born sons and homosexuality
(University of Toronto: affects one in seven gay males.)
is purely statistical, a external
factor likely to explain.
ANDREA CAMPERIO-CIANI OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PADUA
DISCOVERED THE PREDICTED EXTERNAL FACTOR.
Lesbians married heterosexually (for instance out of a lack of self-
awareness, to escape the inquisition against gays, for economic
support, particularly prior to the women's lib movement 40 years ago,
etc.) have higher fecundity (they produce more babies.)
"20-20," 2000, "marriage counselors have seen a sudden
influx of middle aged married women with children complaining of
"lacking something," "not knowing what it is," and ultimately
accepting that they don't want to go further without accepting that
they in fact are lesbians.
KPBS, "MEXICO," 2000: a man interviewed in Mexico "has as many babies
as possible to avoid being wrongly ferreted out as gay"
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/16/eveningnews/main2365036.shtml
CBS News: 1/16/2007:
More Women Saying "I Don't"
Analysis Finds 51% Of Women Were Single In 2005; Shift Partly Because
More Women Work
Paranoia is Greek for "all knowing," the foundation of Western
religion's omnicient god, in psychiatry, paranoids being people
assuming that inasmuch as they're all knowing, if someting goes
wrong, it can't be their fault.)
Note Sarah Palin advocated the religious right line entirely and her
husband is reported to have been (I don't personally know this) a
member, if not a leader, of the sort of separationist organization
(Alaskan Independence Party) you might otherwise expect to find in
Sarah Palin's place of origin (Idaho, home of the Aryan Nation.)
That is also the home of Lou Dobbs, to me leader of the scapegoating
of
Mexicans business.
Religious women, holier than thou
(including license to judge, even scapegoat, and encouraged to engage
in hyposcrisy and denial.)
ENTER THROUGH THE DISCLAIMER PAGE:
witchdoctorwithdogma
<witchdoctorwithdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DISCLAIMERS:
> I do not knowVirginiaFoxx' psychological constitution in any
> respect. I do not know that she was lying when addressing the
> Matthew
> Shepard murder in Congressional session. I do not know her feelings
> toward the opposite sex. I also do not know Ann Coulter's
> psychological constitution in any respect. I do not know her
> feelings
> toward the opposite sex.
> I do not know that either suffers from any emotional or sociologic
> shortcoming.
> The following entirely reflects my opinion, my impression, and my
> expectations both as to anything that can be taken from the following
> that is explicit or implied.
>
> for the royal treatment, see:http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
>
> Because the gay gene only passes maternally and the more connected
> with the inquisition of gays, but also with inquisition and
> scapegoating generally inasmuch as the inquisition against gays is the
> forerunner to all major inquisitions, a person is the likelier they
> are to harbor the gay gene (gays, esp. lesbians (gay gene only passes
> maternally,) induced to marry heterosexually to avoid inquisition,) I
> least one of her X chromosomes (women have 2, it known recently that
> the region in which that gene resides is replete with genes that DO
> NOT "CANCEL OUT.")
>
> begun exploring whether religion's invention and culture of making
> straight guys
> afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay has interacted with
> sociobiologics on
> the mitochondrial level. Sociobiology (requires basic understanding
> of
> evolution and human genetic variation:)
>
> Pre-menstrual syndrome, menstruation and menopause send fertile
> men to fertile women for numerical genetic advantage, at this level
> probably for the species as a whole. By anointing women with the
> power to make men afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay has
> religion bestowed a numerical genetic advantage factor to the
> menopausal disposition beyond those times in the human female
> reproductive processes when female behavior is designed by nature
> to send men looking elsewhere?
>
> (Why mitochondrial? Though my site is aimed at everyone, this
> requires a basic understanding of the ideas offered at my site but
> also a slightly deeper understanding of genetics, though still
> totally at the lay person's level. You can find what tipped me off to
> that inquiry in due time on my website.)
>
> I will NOT discuss potential ramifications in turn about her
> offspring.
>
> Now it certainly at least appears (though I don't know if it's true)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLEqHkpzdG8
>
> THEREFORE WHAT I WOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT IS, IF SHE HAS A SON,
> WHETHER HER (MY ASSUMED, NOT KNOWN) ENTHUSIASM FOR ANTI-GAY
> INQUISITION (INCORPORATING MAKING STRAIGHT GUYS AFRAID OF BEING
> WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY) AND HER (MY ASSUMED, NOT KNOWN) RACISM
> HAS MADE HER SO MUCH THE HABITUAL SCAPEGOATER WHETHER SHE SCAPEGOATS
> HER OWN SON, ESPECIALLY IF SHOULD WOULD HAVE STARTED HER
> (HYPOTHESIZED--ONLY MY HYPOTHETICAL (HER BEING PUBLICLY ANTAGONISTIC
> OF GAYS)) HABIT BY SCAPEGOATING GUYS, BY MAKING THEM AFRAID OF BEING
> WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY, OUT OF RESENTMENT
> OF GUYS.
>
> For instance (from known psych cases--my wife and I have dinner
> parties with a psychiatrist and his wife) has she purposely denied him
> recognition?
>
I inherited impatience from my father.
I separately don't like getting hung up on small things, so if I
have an idea important to me it's out the door.
I will rewrite this, but if you should recognize any of this
in you own biographies, I want you to love your mother(s)
regardless.
The eskimos sent their mothers off to kill themselves, and
humanity's emergent quality is way beyond that
witchdoctorwithdogma
It's a safe bet no one gets this far. The above will be in the re-
write.