Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
All Eastern times at 732 to Dixon, Republican for governor of Michigan
will be here. 805 Blake Masters, Republican for the Senate in Arizona,
will be here. 820. Adam Laxalt, Republican for the Senate from Nevada.
All must wins, as far as I’m concerned. Now. Joe Biden’s going to give a
speech at 7:00 p.m. Eastern. We will start with that speech as well. We
will take a live. To a point. We’ll be listening closely to see if it’s
worth our time. Well, let it start. But that said. He’s going to talk,
they say, about democracy and violence. Something the Democrat Party
knows about violence and undermining democracy. Now, I want to remind
you about violence, if you listen to this program, things that we have
said, I have said here for years, but we went back just the 20, 20. The
violence and the Democrats and the media. April 17, 2020, cut, 19 go. So
the president tweets out, liberate Minnesota, you know, liberate New
York, liberate these these dark blue states and you not the left in the
media are saying he’s encouraging violence. These same Democrats who
supported Black Lives Matter and Antifa at least kept their mouth shut.
They say the president is encouraging violence by using the word
liberate. How about resistance, does that word encourage violence? How
about calling Trump, Hitler or Stalin? Does that encourage violence? The
Democrats are always encouraging violence. They’re violent. Their base
is violent. The Republican base isn’t violent. In part because the
Republican base is much older than the Democrat base, but it’s not
violent. We don’t need lectures from the party of violence. So the
president says liberate the word liberate. Oh, he must mean this is how
sick the media are and they are sick. April 12, 20, 21, almost a year
later. The shooting of that day, right, reporters and media. Participate
in creating violence in America, cut 20 go, it’s these reporters, and in
many ways it’s the media. That are participating and creating enormous
violence in this country. And I’m not kidding. And I’m not kidding. They
are participating in creating enormous violence in this country. These
are not reporters, these are antagonists. That’s exactly what they are.
They’ve already drawn a conclusion. So what do you want to do, you want
to charge this cop with murder? Is that what you want to do? What do you
want to do and why charge them? Just find him guilty and throw him in
prison? Preposterous, January five, twenty twenty cut, twenty one go,
they cannot make the case. Now, President Trump authorized a violent
attack. Against the Capitol building. Whereas Ted Cruz now puts it a
attack by domestic terrorists, I suppose. They cannot make their case.
So they’re trying to make the case that it’s a dereliction of duty. By
the president, they’ve covered up Nancy Pelosi’s role, they will not
release documents, texts, emails, they will not subpoena her records.
They will not compel her testimony under penalty. Of criminal
indictment. In the media, of course, are absolutely silent on this
point. To what extent are the media and the Democrat Party? And these
radical groups responsible. Responsible for the violence that has taken
place in this country. And we’re not going to play them all. Here’s the
last one I’m going to play January 20, 20, 20 to go. Democrats and the
leftist media continue to champion the House. A sham investigation into
January six with news breaking just yesterday that the illegally
constituted committee had subpoenaed Rudy Giuliani, Jenny Ellis and
others at least January six. Truthers generally believed that election
related rhetoric caused the Capitol riots and represent a real threat to
our republic. They would turn their attention to the current White House
and to their grandpa. And one week ago, Biden eclipsed everything Trump
and his supporters said about the validity of the 2020 election by
framing his false claims of voter suppression and subversion. As Jim
Crow 2.0, our commander in chief has guaranteed a divided America, the
only remaining question is whether he is also guaranteed a violent
America. Now, we’ve touched on this, too, and not just Biden, Schumer,
the Democrat Party and the media. Have planted the seeds of violence
after the 20, 22 and 24 elections, particularly the latter. And they’ve
told the nation that Donald Trump is not not to be a nominee. These are
the real Bolsheviks. That’s right, I said it. Mm hmm. And what about
Antifa and Black Lives Matter? And the media and their friends, small
montage from Greybeard Cut twenty three go. I argue to you tonight all
punches are not equal morally in the eyes of the law, yes, but in the
eyes of good and evil. Here’s the argument. They are strictly principled
antifascists and what they see in the Trump administration and what they
see happening in this country. They see they see the neo fascism that we
see and they’ve taken a principled stand to stand against white
supremacists and white nationalists wherever they may show up. It says
it right in the name antifa, anti fascism, which is what they were.
They’re fighting. Listen, there’s no organization is perfect. There was
some violence. I think that a lot of people recognize that when pushed,
self-defense is a legitimate response to white supremacist neo-Nazi
violence. The problem is to equate the violence in reaction against
bigotry with the bigotry itself is to misunderstand the fact that when
you go to cancer treatment, the radiation is tough treatment, but it is
meant to remove the cancer. They wouldn’t have been anywhere near there
had it not been for the fact that white supremacists, neo-Nazis were out
scaring the living daylights out of most of the people in that town.
That thuggishness is thuggishness wherever it comes from politically,
and we should be the first to call it out. I disagree. Mm hmm. The media
and the Democrats have supported Antifa. They have supported Black Lives
Matter. In the 60s, they supported the Weather Underground Black
Panthers Students for Democratic Action, who they phoolan. Who are they
kidding and what exactly have the Democrats done for a quote unquote,
democracy? What have they done? Election deniers, are you kidding me?
Peter Doocy asked Corinne Jinpa at the White House briefing today, is
Biden going to call out Democrat election deniers tonight to cut to go
in the context of calling out election deniers? Then, is he going to
call out Republicans that deny election results and Democrats? But it
doesn’t it doesn’t matter if there’s a D or an R after your name, he
will call out any rhetoric that is that that leads to potentially
political violence or that calls it to political violence for political
violence. That is a problem. The president has always, always condemned
political violence. It doesn’t matter, again, if your everybody has
always condemned political violence. But Joe Biden’s. Comments. Comments
are violent rhetoric. That’s what they are, their violent rhetoric
speech he gave in front of Independence Hall with a red background,
shocking, calling tens of millions of people semih fascists, sickening.
Trying to turn one American against another, whether it’s the oil
companies. Whether it’s race, he’s disgusting. And in terms of denying
elections. I’ve played this before, and I’m not going to play the whole
thing again, but let’s just get a little taste of this before. The king
of hate speech, Joe Biden, speaks tonight. Democrats denying election
results cut 24 hour ago, you can run the best campaign, you can even
become the nominee and you can have the election stolen from you. Now,
can you win with Russian interference? That’s right. But rightly,
because I think it’s an illegitimate president that didn’t really win.
So how do you fight against that? You are absolutely right. He is an
illegitimate president, in my mind. Would you be my vice presidential
candidate? Folks, look, I absolutely agree it’s wrong to actually win
the election in 2016. He lost the election and he was Putin of Russia.
Trump knows he’s an illegitimate president. The president elect,
although legally elected, is not legitimate president elect as a
legitimate president. You said you believe that Russia’s interference
altered the outcome of the election. I do. We have a president who, if,
in fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact
not be a legitimate president. The one thing that Trump is fearful of
when it comes to his being president is that finally we will see how
illegitimate his victory actually was. I have an objection. I object to
the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I objected because people
are horrified. He’s an illegitimate president. Do you believe Trump is
illegitimate president? What I believe is that there’s no question that
the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference.
But there absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy. So that legitimacy is
in question. Yes, that was a very tainted election. And in that sense,
it’s illegitimate. Why do you think the president is going to such great
lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he knows he
didn’t. He knows he’s an illegitimate president. Stolen emails, stolen
drone, stolen from stolen election. Welcome to the world of
unprecedented Trump. So do you believe President Trump is an
illegitimate president? Those are what I just said was I can’t recite
the Russian attempts to have the elections, but frankly, the FBI away in
on the election. I think maybe they could make this election
illegitimate. There was a widespread understanding that this election
was not on the level. We still don’t know what really happened. I mean,
there’s just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover,
but you don’t win by three million votes and have all this other
shenanigans, stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, whoa,
something’s not right here. The outcome of the election was affected by
their interference. And now we need to know to what degree, if any, the
Trump campaign was actually in collusion with the Russians. He knows
he’s an illegitimate president. So, of course, he’s obsessed with me.
And I believe that it’s a guilty conscience. Yes, we won the
presidential election. They stole my. And Al Gore won that election. I
think he won anyway. Actually, I think he carried Florida, Bush versus
Gore. A court took away a presidency. Of all the votes were counted that
Al Gore would be president today and George Bush will be backing off. I
come from Florida where you and others participate in what I call the
United States court, a time there’s no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was
elected president. I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida
electoral votes on the subject because of the overwhelming evidence of
official misconduct. Deliberate. The chair and the chair must remind me
to sign by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions
of Americans who have been disenfranchised. By Florida’s inaccurate vote
count, the veto in the United States decided this election, speaking to
a Democratic group in Chicago to say he made it clear he thinks Al Gore
was the winner. The time it was over, our candidate had won the popular
vote and all the way that could win the election was to stop the voting
in Florida. Katherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker and the Supreme Court
had tampered with the results. Al Gore would be president. The Supreme
Court in 2000, Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not
the presidency, but the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court stopped the
counting. The vote of the left, the council on Al Gore got the necessary
vote. The Supreme Court selected George W. Bush. All right, ladies and
gents, this goes on for another six minutes. So when you hear Biden
tonight talk about election deniers and how dangerous they are. When you
hear him talk about violent rhetoric. I want you to remember whose mouth
that’s coming from. And I want you to remember that the man who will be
speaking to you at 7:00 p.m. Eastern tonight. Worked arm in arm, hand in
hand with the worst Southern segregationists. To prevent school
integration. Half a century ago, I want you to remember that. I’ll be
right back
Hour 1 Segment 2
We’ve now reached a point, ladies and gentlemen, where are the people
who began this election denying? Challenging the Electoral College
starting under Bush’s election in 2000 and 2004 in 2016 with Trump. The
election deniers led by Hillary Clinton, including Biden himself, Al
Gore, Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, now they’re accusing
Republicans of being election deniers. Because of legitimate questions
raised about what their lawyers had done in 2020 and the party of
violence, the Democrat Party, the party, the clan. The party that
refused to outlaw lynching. The party of segregation, the party of all
these horrific thing now is accusing Republicans of promoting violence
when their cities are loaded with violence. As a result, the Democrat
Party policy.
Hour 1 Segment 3
You know, the Reagan line is really the simplest way to understand this
election. Are you better off than you were two years ago? The Democrats
had their shot for 20 months. They burned down our oil industry, they
burned down our food industry, they’ve burned down our border wall.
They’re burning down our constitutional and legal systems. Inflation
through the roof. Gas prices through the roof, just imagine another two
years. Can you handle that? Can you handle another two years? There’s
another thing going on in this country, they’re talking about these
white suburban women who are kind of shifting remarkably and heavily
toward the Republicans. I want to talk about this for a moment. There
was a piece in Real Clear Politics by Lynn Yucel. About a month or so
ago, six weeks ago, and she’s the visiting assistant professor of
politics at Washington Lee University and she specializes in the
constitutional convention. She wrote recently, Michael Tessler commented
on the rise of white identity politics. Tesla’s analysis draws on years
of research into radicalized politics, and he shows convincingly there’s
a rise in white identity politics and that this rise is tied to
perceptions of antiwhite discrimination, quote unquote. But when trying
to explain why perceptions of antiwhite bias might also be on the rise,
his analysis falls flat. Supposedly, it has something to do with
Republicans and Donald Trump. And I’m telling you this because this is
the narrative of the Democrat Party in the media. Oh, look at the white
rice. I want to get back to this, but there was an ad that’s been
played. By a group. It’s a very mainstream group. What is it? Now, it’s
apparently it’s America’s first legal, it says here, but Chris Hayes
said this is indistinguishable from David Duke, but you’d expect that
from Chris Hayes because he’s worked for the nation in the past, which
is a in my view, a commie rag. And he’s a radical kook. But here’s
here’s how it goes. Go ahead, did racism against white people become OK?
Joe Biden put white people last in line for covid relief funds. Kamala
Harris, a disaster aid should go to non-white citizens first. Liberal
politicians block access to medicine based on skin color. Progressive
corporations, airlines, universities all openly discriminate against
white Americans. Racism is always wrong. The left’s antiwhite bigotry
must stop. We are all entitled to equal treatment under law. America
first legal paid for this ad. And of course, that’s true. American
Marxism. We have a whole section on this that points out how this has
been done in the media and by the Democrat Party. Facts don’t lie.
Democrats do. Now, Professor, use how goes on, never once does this
author speculate whether perception’s. Of such discrimination might be
on the rise because antiwhite racism is becoming increasingly common. In
other words, perhaps white Americans are actually perceiving a real
phenomenon that is now pervasive in schools and the workplace. And I
might add, and the Democrat Party in the media, as any steward of George
Orwell knows, no authority and no authoritarian government can ever gain
complete control unless a commandeers people’s thinking through the
manipulation of language. So the dystopian powers in 1984 deliberately
turn the meaning of words upside down in a process known as double
think. The same process is happening today with the words used to
discuss racism, intra woylie and fashion. Ibrahim Kendi remember him,
the radical. He insists that the only way to fight racism is to embrace
racial discrimination in perpetuity. The so-called anti-racism, as he
calls it, is his likely to stamp out genuine racism, as Orwell’s
Ministry of Truth was apt to stamp out falsehoods. In order to
understand what’s going on. We must call to mind the traditional
definition of racism. This stereotyping, denigrating, marginalizing or
excluding a persons on the basis of race look up any definition of
racism prior to the racial awakening taking place in the last decade.
And it’ll be one race neutral to involve some act of free will relating
to word, deed or belief. OK, so they’ve changed the the definition
fundamentally now, and that’s how this works, and we’ve talked about
this before. Changing the language, the definition of racism just
undergone a radical change in short time, according to the new eighth
grade curriculum for the Albemarle County, Virginia school district,
racism now means, quote, the marginalization and oppression of people of
color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges
white people. Perhaps the most jarring aspect of this new definition is
that it’s that it is no longer race neutral. It is now impossible by
definition for white people to be victims of racism. That definition
itself constructs a racial hierarchy whereby only people of color may be
victimized and the only and only white people may marginalize or
oppress. But there’s something even more insidious about the new
definition, since the marginalization and oppression of people of color
is no longer committed by word, thought or deed. But it’s based instead
on an inescapable socially constructed racial hierarchy that always
privileges white people, quote unquote. It means that white people are
engaging in racism simply by being white. That is simply by existing.
And hence are privileged within this impersonal system of
marginalization and oppression, a person of color is a victim of racism.
By definition, a person identified as white as a racist by definition.
Therefore, not only does the new definition fail to capture the full
meaning of racism, the definition is itself an example of the anti white
racism being taught to white children. This is critical race theory.
Anti white racism is also seeping into history lessons, most notably
through the curriculum adapted from the New York Times 16 19 project.
When the 16 19 project was first published, it attracted immediate
criticism. Five eminent historians criticized it for its bias and
factual errors. Others criticized it for emphasizing only what was
blameworthy about America’s history and limiting what was praiseworthy.
While these concerns are certainly valid, there’s another serious
problem that has received scant attention. The account is a surprisingly
racist version of U.S. history. The lead article for the 16 19 project
is by Nicole Hannah Jones, who’s been writing antiwhite screeds at least
since she was a college sophomore. In a letter in her college paper, she
alleged, quote, The white race is the biggest murder rapist, pillager
and thief of the modern world, unquote. Not only were the white people
in America’s past barbaric devils, barbaric devils, but the descendants
of the savage people continue to harm the black community to this day,
she said. Nonwhites, by contrast, were uniformly portrayed as both
virtuous and victimized. Of course, nobody should be held accountable
for the hyperboles, indignities one might espouse as an undergraduate,
few of us could bear the brunt of such an examination. The sophomoric
scribblings of young Nicole Hannah would be irrelevant, except that the
pattern in her writing hasn’t changed. What we find in her Pulitzer
Prize winning contribution to the 16 19 project is more moderate in
tone, more sophisticated in composition. But otherwise it is the same
racialized dualism she espoused in college. And Jones has article an
important part of the lesson plan adapted for schools, the word white is
used to describe people, our community. Seventy seven times and at 35
cases, white people are described as holding some kind of power
privilege, almost always unearned or illegitimate. In thirty two cases,
the word is associated with oppression, injustice and cruelty, white
enslavers, widespread white violence, systemic white suppression of
black life, etc.. And the telling of history, white Americans during the
darkest days of Jim Crow, how the same racist ideology is Jefferson and
his fellow white colonists with 32 instances of specially white Barberi.
It is impossible to ignore the gratuitous overuse of this racial
category category when describing everything that is diabolical in this
country’s history. Nowhere do we read about a white American acting for
the good, except in a single instance in which certain white Republicans
joined forces with the black community after the Civil War. We find the
popular opposite when examining the 136 references to black people in
this article. The word is used 72 times to describe victimization by
violence or injustice, always at the hands of whites, 49 times and
laudable terms, there’s not a single instance in which black is used to
describe a person or deemed deserving of criticism. While only a textual
analysis can provide the big picture, individual passages drive home the
racist message more explicitly, quote, For the most part, according to
this history, black Americans fought to secure rights alone. Yet we
never fought only for ourselves. The article teaches schoolchildren that
black Americans, more than any other group, embrace the democratic
ideals of the common good. Children also learn, quote, Our founding
fathers may not have actually believed in the ideals they espoused, but
black people did. Hannah Jones, his composition is American history and
black and white, it teaches that blackness is everything that enables
his country and whiteness is everything that debases it. There was a
time in the Jim Crow South to their everlasting shame when schools
taught children lessons and white supremacy. Masters of American
History. The 16 19 project has introduced a new form of black supremacy
to American history, and it’s been adopted by 4500 schools. The
Economist has reported on the dizzying number of equity related hiring
commitments promised by American businesses, Facebook alone has promised
to 30 percent more black people in leadership positions. Since other
businesses across America have made similar commitments, we can expect
the competition to hire and promote black professionals will drive their
value to stratospheric heights while the perceived value of white
professionals will plummet. Recent training program. Bank of America
made the consequences of such commitments unmistakably clear. It
instructed, quote, white employees in particular to cede power to people
of color, quote unquote. There’s no word that any member of Bank of
America’s board of directors had offered to step down to make room for
replacement of cover. Demands for self-denial are always made by persons
who already hold seats of power and privilege and have no intention of
giving them up, etc.. The less privileged employees are expected to
submit to segregation based on their race or sex. That’s true, isn’t it?
Racism of any kind is never a single defining act, it is death by a
thousand cuts, and these cuts to white employees have become ubiquitous.
I know of a book project that had been under contract for two years
before being scuttled. The press rejected the volume of collected
essays, in part because the 14 contributing authors were not
sufficiently diverse. The acquisition editor at the press defended the
judgment of one of its anonymous reviewers. Book’s coming out right now.
Simply do not have to address systemic whiteness and maleness that
pervades the academy and particularly political science. And it goes on.
Skeptics inclined to dismiss the seriousness of antiwhite racism will
likely counter excuse me that the examples I’ve described are
milquetoast. They’re not nearly as horrific as the antiblack racism of
the Jim Crow South. Of course they’re not. Of course they’re not.
Antiwhite racism is not that bad now, nor is it reasonable to expect it
will get that bad in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, racism of any
kind is an evil in itself. Antiwhite racism today a greater problem, at
least in the white collar world, than antiblack racism and its continued
prevalence prevalence excuse me, its continued prevalence. This is very,
very tiny font. I’m doing my best and severity is likely to spawn a
backlash that will further inflame racial enmity. For anyone who may be
skeptical that anti white racism is no worse than antiblack, consider
this. Overt acts of anti black discrimination today are socially,
politically and professionally unimaginable. Not so with whites. In
addition to the ubiquity of the evil itself, this racism is bound to
provoke backlash and she goes on. But you can’t talk about this, even
though it’s obvious. When you watch Joy Reid, when you watch Tiffany
Cross or MSNBC, generally, when you watch CNN, when you watch some of
the so-called experts and professors they bring on. It is just
undeniable. And when you read American Marxism in the section I have,
they’re from a Heritage Foundation, I think it’s a fellow named Goldberg
when he New York Times, Washington Post and the other media outlets, the
statistics are unequivocal. It’s not a perception, it’s a reality. And
so when we talk about a colorblind society, we the people I don’t care
if you’re white, black or in between, you’re attacked. Why? Because what
you’re dealing with now is an ideology, a Democrat Party and their
surrogates who used to embrace anti black racism and now embrace anti
white racism and I might add, anti Asian racism and anti Hispanic
racism. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
The nation is a radical left rag, Chris Hayes has been an editor there,
a nation endorsed Bernie Sanders in his two last elections. And also
almost a year ago, the nation named Jakobsson founder Bushcare Sungkar
as its new president. Jacobin is a literary outlet for socialists and
worse. And so, again, when you read American Marxism, you understand
where all this is coming from, the racism. The the kind of tribalism
that the effort to destroy society, and it’s the kind of people that
Comcast through MSNBC and NBC hire. Hiya. Now, most you don’t know who
Chris Hayes is. He’s a bizarre looking guy with these bizarre glasses
who says bizarre things. So he says that the the ad that was played that
I played for you, it could have been played by David Duke. Why does
David Duke believe in a colorblind society? I thought he was a neo-Nazi
or a Klansman. That means he would be a long time old time Democrat,
Chris. Reminder at the top of the hour, we will go to Joe Biden live.
We’ll see how much of a we can tolerate. I’m not into masochism and
listening to him is just that. We shall see. We have a whole lot more to
talk about. We have three very important candidates coming up. I see the
interest rates went up another three quarters of a point. The housing
market is plummeting and the Fed chairman said today that they are still
scared to hell in so many words of inflation and they have to fight it.
You just remember that when Democrats asked you for your vote, Mazwai,
Haslam, hand them your wallet.