Steve and Jamie - please give it a rest
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
are getting a little tedious. Whoever may have been right in the first place
is irrelevant now as you're both making tits of yourselves so why not just
agree to disagree and call it a day.
B2003
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9a2gv$jic$1...@aioe.org...
I would give it a rest with Jamie, but it's not as simple as that,
because you've got Sean "I'm obsessed with Steve" Inglis sticking his
oar in at every juncture with his obsessional lunacy.
You're one of the group of people on here who frequently has a go at
me, so I think it's time that "your group" had a quiet word with this
lunatic that stalks me on here (preferably a quiet word that involves
getting the men with white coats round and carting him off in a
straitjacket), because it's taking the fucking piss.
--
Steve - www.savefm.org - stop the BBC bullies switching off FM
www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info
"It is the sheer volume of online audio content available via
internet-connected devices which terrifies the UK radio industry. I
believe that broadband-delivered radio will explode in the years to
come, offering very local, unregulated content, as well as opening a
window to the radio stations of the world." - from the Myers Report
seani
wrote:
> <boltar2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:h9a2gv$jic$1...@aioe.org...
>
> > We all know you 2 can't stand each other but the endless tit for tat
> > posts
> > are getting a little tedious. Whoever may have been right in the
> > first place
> > is irrelevant now as you're both making tits of yourselves so why
> > not just
> > agree to disagree and call it a day.
>
> I would give it a rest with Jamie, but it's not as simple as that,
> because you've got Sean "I'm obsessed with Steve" Inglis sticking his
> oar in at every juncture with his obsessional lunacy.
>
> You're one of the group of people on here who frequently has a go at
> me, so I think it's time that "your group" had a quiet word with this
> lunatic that stalks me on here (preferably a quiet word that involves
> getting the men with white coats round and carting him off in a
> straitjacket), because it's taking the fucking piss.
>
I care, with no offense to boltar, nothing for his opinion or anyone
else's on this particular instance.
I stick my oar in occasionally. There are plenty of your rants where
I've never commented. It's all here Steve, recorded indefinitely.
You keep claiming you'd prefer I didn't post, yet you mention me by
name apropos of nothing in unrelated posts. Stop doing that and you'll
almost certainly reduce the number of times I need to respond or
comment. But I'll respond as I see fit whenever that happens.
You've made some very direct accusations about my position on some
very delicate matters. I'm certainly not letting it drop until I'm
good and ready.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
>me, so I think it's time that "your group" had a quiet word with this
*sigh*
There is no "group". We're not a little cabal that plots against you behind
the scenes on alt.dabsworth.is.paranoid or something. Just a bunch of people
who's opinions sometimes differ from yours.
B2003
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:943670db-0bd3-4539...@o35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It isn't me that's got something to hide, Sean. YOU are the one who IS
completely obsessed with me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You keep claiming you'd prefer I didn't post, yet you mention me by
name apropos of nothing in unrelated posts. Stop doing that and you'll
almost certainly reduce the number of times I need to respond or
comment. But I'll respond as I see fit whenever that happens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don't try to claim that me using yoru name is an excuse for the fact
that the frequency of your posts has increased DRAMATICALLY since I
removed you from my killfile.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You've made some very direct accusations about my position on some
very delicate matters. I'm certainly not letting it drop until I'm
good and ready.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Drop what, Sean? WTF are YOU going to drop? Your obsession with me
caused you to ignore the fact that you were sticking up for Jamie, who
was 15/16 having a sexual relationship with someone aged at least 26,
and I wouldn't be surprised if they "met" on the Internet and likely
had sex before he was legal as well. THAT is what you were sticking up
for in order to score cheap points against me on fucking Usenet. You
need help. You really need help.
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9a56t$mkk$1...@aioe.org...
Do STFU if you've got nothing constructive to say. You knew what I
meant.
seani
wrote:
> "seani" <ingl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
I'm stating it as a self-evident fact and a matter of record. You
include my name where you don't need to. You unrealistically expect no
response.
Your imaginary killfile has absolutely no influence on my behaviour.
Why should it? Even if it exists you routinely subvert it by checking
through different logins. Again a matter of fact and record.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> You've made some very direct accusations about my position on some
> very delicate matters. I'm certainly not letting it drop until I'm
> good and ready.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Drop what, Sean? WTF are YOU going to drop? Your obsession with me
> caused you to ignore the fact that you were sticking up for Jamie, who
> was 15/16 having a sexual relationship with someone aged at least 26,
> and I wouldn't be surprised if they "met" on the Internet and likely
> had sex before he was legal as well. THAT is what you were sticking up
> for in order to score cheap points against me on fucking Usenet. You
> need help. You really need help.
>
Your characterisation - in fact lies - concerning what I said and
didn't say - they aren't a reflection of reality.
I haven't expressed any opinion on the two issues you continue to
belabor, certainly not the opinions you ascribe to me.
These are your own words and fantasies, not mine.
I stick up for Jamie's right not to have his personal life intruded on
in the way you attempt. Anything other conclusions you draw from that
is a smokescreen and total non-sequitur - an attempt to divert
attention from your own behaviour.
DAB sounds worse than FM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm trying to work here, so I'll just reply to the point about my
characterisation of what you've done. I have not lied about what you
did, Sean. You DID turn a blind eye to what I was being critical
about. That is not a lie.
You also claimed that my questioniing was solely to extract
informatino about Jamie's sex life, when in fact that's bullshit, and
you're yet again claiming that you know what's in my mind better than
I do. You don't.
And with regards to me "intruding" into Jamie's personal life, if he
didn't make the accusations he repeatedly does about me I would just
ignore him, but in every fucking post he claims that I'm thick and
that I haven't got the qualications that i worked fucking hard for,
and that I've somehow got a very poor level of knowledge of digital
radio and so on. I'm sick to fucking death of him, and I don't
apologise for questioning him about what he's said on here.
I went through a phase a few months ago of deliberately trying to be
reasonable with this objectionable little shit to see if he would stop
the abuse, but he ignored all of that and just continued with his
incessant abuse. But you turn a complete blind eye to what he says
about me, because you're not obsessed with him, you're only obsessed
with me.
My questioning of him was honestly intended to see if I could figure
out whether what he's been saying was bullshit or exaggeration or
whatever. Only when that failed to get any new information did I turn
to the issue with Scott.
All of the above is no doubt wasting my breath, because I'm trying to
reason with someone who has an obsessional hatred of me. At least I've
tried.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>> There is no "group". We're not a little cabal that plots against you
>> behind
>> the scenes on alt.dabsworth.is.paranoid or something. Just a bunch
>> of people
>> who's opinions sometimes differ from yours.
>
>
>Do STFU if you've got nothing constructive to say.
How about doing us all a favour and taking your own advice.
B2003
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9a9lb$s42$1...@aioe.org...
Easier said than done when I've got seani stalking me........
Silk
> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:h9a56t$mkk$1...@aioe.org...
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:59:08 +0100
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>>> You're one of the group of people on here who frequently has a go at
>>> me, so I think it's time that "your group" had a quiet word with
>>> this
>> *sigh*
>>
>> There is no "group". We're not a little cabal that plots against you
>> behind
>> the scenes on alt.dabsworth.is.paranoid or something. Just a bunch
>> of people
>> who's opinions sometimes differ from yours.
>
>
> Do STFU if you've got nothing constructive to say. You knew what I
> meant.
It's everyone else picking on you, isn't it Dabsybaby.
Silk
> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:h9a9lb$s42$1...@aioe.org...
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:42:19 +0100
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>>>> There is no "group". We're not a little cabal that plots against
>>>> you
>>>> behind
>>>> the scenes on alt.dabsworth.is.paranoid or something. Just a bunch
>>>> of people
>>>> who's opinions sometimes differ from yours.
>>>
>>> Do STFU if you've got nothing constructive to say.
>> How about doing us all a favour and taking your own advice.
>
>
> Easier said than done when I've got seani stalking me........
Of course, you could always assume the role of adult here and start
behaving like one. You'll find you'll get a lot more respect.
jamie powell
"Silk" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:h9au42$mu8$2...@aioe.org...
Indeed, Dabsworthless is *soo* immature for his age.
He was probably still potty training at age 16, which is why he's so shocked
(or, should that be, jealous) of my being grown up enough to have a boyfriend.
His mum, as well as brainwashing him into thinking that "all sexual
relationships == crimes", probaly didn't let him stay out after 9 o'clock
until he turned 40.
I bet his household is like the one in "Sorry!" (an 80's TV sitcom, shown on
UK Gold sometimes).
Silk
> I bet his household is like the one in "Sorry!" (an 80's TV sitcom,
> shown on UK Gold sometimes).
>
I remember it the first time around. :-(
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9b0ig$qlb$1...@aioe.org...
>
> "Silk" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:h9au42$mu8$2...@aioe.org...
>> DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
>>> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:h9a9lb$s42$1...@aioe.org...
>>>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:42:19 +0100
>>>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>>>>>> There is no "group". We're not a little cabal that plots
>>>>>> against you
>>>>>> behind
>>>>>> the scenes on alt.dabsworth.is.paranoid or something. Just a
>>>>>> bunch
>>>>>> of people
>>>>>> who's opinions sometimes differ from yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do STFU if you've got nothing constructive to say.
>>>> How about doing us all a favour and taking your own advice.
>>>
>>>
>>> Easier said than done when I've got seani stalking me........
>>
>> Of course, you could always assume the role of adult here and start
>> behaving like one. You'll find you'll get a lot more respect.
>
> Indeed, Dabsworthless is *soo* immature for his age.
> He was probably still potty training at age 16, which is why he's so
> shocked (or, should that be, jealous) of my being grown up enough to
> have a boyfriend.
It's obvious that you would say that you were mature enough to make
your own decisions, everybody aged 16 would say that, but laws are
made because people at that age aren't mature enough to make such
decisions.
> His mum, as well as brainwashing him into thinking that "all sexual
> relationships == crimes", probaly didn't let him stay out after 9
> o'clock until he turned 40.
> I bet his household is like the one in "Sorry!" (an 80's TV sitcom,
> shown on UK Gold sometimes).
I'd been there, done that, and was a full on party animal when I was
your age, whereas when I suggested that you were wasting the best
years of your life spending so much time posting on Usenet at the age
of 20 (what a waste), your response was that you preferred to stay in
curled up on the sofa with a mug of bleeding Horlicks reading some
soppy romance novel with your slippers on, you boring, boring fucker -
I'd done more partying by the time I was your age than you'll probably
have done by the time you're mine, so don't try to lecture me about
being a boring twat!
jamie powell
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
news:7hsjddF...@mid.individual.net...
>
> It's obvious that you would say that you were mature enough to make your own
> decisions, everybody aged 16 would say that, but laws are made because
> people at that age aren't mature enough to make such decisions.
The legal age of consent is 16, you retarded inbred fuckwit.
> I'd been there, done that, and was a full on party animal when I was your
> age, whereas when I suggested that you were wasting the best years of your
> life spending so much time posting on Usenet at the age of 20 (what a
> waste),
You should know that playing with you on usenet occupies only a tiny amount of
my time - you see, you're just not that important to me.
I'm glad you admit that writing on usenet is a waste, because this realisation
will help lay the foundations for your journey out of fantasyland (the land
where you're a radio expert) to the real world (where you're currently a
useless bum).
> your response was that you preferred to stay in curled up on the sofa with a
> mug of bleeding Horlicks reading some soppy romance novel with your slippers
> on, you boring, boring fucker -
My respose was nothing of the sort - that's just more *total and utter
fiction* from the dysfunctional mind of steven the self-deluded idiot.
> I'd done more partying by the time I was your age than you'll probably have
> done by the time you're mine, so don't try to lecture me about being a
> boring twat!
Those who talk about it most do it least. You've already admitted that you
didn't even go to uni at the normal age - and uni is where most 20 year-olds'
social lives are based, mine included.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7hsjddF...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> It's obvious that you would say that you were mature enough to make
>> your own decisions, everybody aged 16 would say that, but laws are
>> made because people at that age aren't mature enough to make such
>> decisions.
>
> The legal age of consent is 16, you retarded inbred fuckwit.
My point was that 16 year olds may consider themselves to be adults,
but in reality they're still children. You want to spend a year
surrounded by 18 year olds when you're 26, like I did in my first year
of my degree, then you'll see just how immature people aged 18 are,
and they're supposed to be a lot more mature than 16 year olds. The
age of consent is irrelevant, because the suggestion that you were a
mature adult aged 16, which is what I think you're implying by quoting
the age of consent, is utter nonsense, son.
>> I'd been there, done that, and was a full on party animal when I
>> was your age, whereas when I suggested that you were wasting the
>> best years of your life spending so much time posting on Usenet at
>> the age of 20 (what a waste),
>
> You should know that playing with you on usenet occupies only a tiny
> amount of my time - you see, you're just not that important to me.
It doesn't occupy much of my time, although admittedly I have to deal
with stalkers, which wastes some additional time that I'd prefer to
spend doing other things.
> I'm glad you admit that writing on usenet is a waste, because this
> realisation will help lay the foundations for your journey out of
> fantasyland (the land where you're a radio expert) to the real world
> (where you're currently a useless bum).
Yawn.
>> your response was that you preferred to stay in curled up on the
>> sofa with a mug of bleeding Horlicks reading some soppy romance
>> novel with your slippers on, you boring, boring fucker -
>
> My respose was nothing of the sort - that's just more *total and
> utter fiction* from the dysfunctional mind of steven the
> self-deluded idiot.
What you said basically made you sound like a boring twat who's
wasting the best years of his life staying in doing nothign
interesting.
>> I'd done more partying by the time I was your age than you'll
>> probably have done by the time you're mine, so don't try to lecture
>> me about being a boring twat!
>
> Those who talk about it most do it least.
The only time I can recall saying anything about what I did when I was
your age before today was when I simply said that I didn't waste the
best years of my life like you're blatantly doing.
> You've already admitted that you didn't even go to uni at the normal
> age
At least I now know that you're lying when you claim that I didn't go
to uni!
> - and uni is where most 20 year-olds' social lives are based, mine
> included.
Utter nonsense. The percentage of people who went to uni when I was 18
was *far* smaller than it is today, so virtually everybody you knew at
school still lived and went out in the same area. I got the best of
both worlds, because I did that when I was 18 - 21, and then in my mid
20s I sort of got to do the same thing again at uni.
jamie powell
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:h9b7qu$52g$1...@aioe.org...
>>
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>> news:7hsjddF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> It's obvious that you would say that you were mature enough to make your
>>> own decisions, everybody aged 16 would say that, but laws are made because
>>> people at that age aren't mature enough to make such decisions.
>>
>> The legal age of consent is 16, you retarded inbred fuckwit.
>
>
> My point was that 16 year olds may consider themselves to be adults, but in
> reality they're still children. You want to spend a year surrounded by 18
> year olds when you're 26, like I did in my first year of my degree, then
> you'll see just how immature people aged 18 are, and they're supposed to be
> a lot more mature than 16 year olds. The age of consent is irrelevant,
> because the suggestion that you were a mature adult aged 16, which is what I
> think you're implying by quoting the age of consent, is utter nonsense, son.
As silk said, you're ridiculously immature. You're just making yourself look
stupid with all this big talk.
>
> It doesn't occupy much of my time, although admittedly I have to deal with
> stalkers, which wastes some additional time that I'd prefer to spend doing
> other things.
Stalkers - in your dreams. More of your self-important delusions there innit.
>
> What you said basically made you sound like a boring twat who's wasting the
> best years of his life staying in doing nothign interesting.
That's your imaginations at work again - nothing more.
>> Those who talk about it most do it least.
>
>
> The only time I can recall saying anything about what I did when I was your
> age before today was when I simply said that I didn't waste the best years
> of my life like you're blatantly doing.
I'm not. That's your imaginations at work again - nothing more.
You're the 40 year old loser, remember?
>> You've already admitted that you didn't even go to uni at the normal age
>
>
> At least I now know that you're lying when you claim that I didn't go to
> uni!
Dream on. The point is that you even *admit* to not attending uni at the
normal age - presumably because you struggled with GCSE maths until you were
26, before they gave up and just passed you anyway.
I believe you went to uni fwiw - and then failed the first year.
>> - and uni is where most 20 year-olds' social lives are based, mine
>> included.
>
>
> Utter nonsense. The percentage of people who went to uni when I was 18 was
> *far* smaller than it is today, so virtually everybody you knew at school
> still lived and went out in the same area. I got the best of both worlds,
> because I did that when I was 18 - 21, and then in my mid 20s I sort of got
> to do the same thing again at uni.
I bet you were an isolated outsider in reality. You have all the hallmarks of
one.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7hsr27F...@mid.individual.net...
>> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:h9b7qu$52g$1...@aioe.org...
>>>
>>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>>> news:7hsjddF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> It's obvious that you would say that you were mature enough to
>>>> make your own decisions, everybody aged 16 would say that, but
>>>> laws are made because people at that age aren't mature enough to
>>>> make such decisions.
>>>
>>> The legal age of consent is 16, you retarded inbred fuckwit.
>>
>>
>> My point was that 16 year olds may consider themselves to be
>> adults, but in reality they're still children. You want to spend a
>> year surrounded by 18 year olds when you're 26, like I did in my
>> first year of my degree, then you'll see just how immature people
>> aged 18 are, and they're supposed to be a lot more mature than 16
>> year olds. The age of consent is irrelevant, because the suggestion
>> that you were a mature adult aged 16, which is what I think you're
>> implying by quoting the age of consent, is utter nonsense, son.
>
> As silk said, you're ridiculously immature. You're just making
> yourself look stupid with all this big talk.
Silk's a homophobic racist, so I'm surprised you two get on so well.
>> It doesn't occupy much of my time, although admittedly I have to
>> deal with stalkers, which wastes some additional time that I'd
>> prefer to spend doing other things.
>
> Stalkers - in your dreams. More of your self-important delusions
> there innit.
Yawn.
>> What you said basically made you sound like a boring twat who's
>> wasting the best years of his life staying in doing nothign
>> interesting.
>
> That's your imaginations at work again - nothing more.
Yawn.
>>> Those who talk about it most do it least.
>>
>>
>> The only time I can recall saying anything about what I did when I
>> was your age before today was when I simply said that I didn't
>> waste the best years of my life like you're blatantly doing.
>
> I'm not. That's your imaginations at work again - nothing more.
> You're the 40 year old loser, remember?
Yawn.
>>> You've already admitted that you didn't even go to uni at the
>>> normal age
>>
>>
>> At least I now know that you're lying when you claim that I didn't
>> go to uni!
>
> Dream on. The point is that you even *admit* to not attending uni at
> the normal age - presumably because you struggled with GCSE maths
> until you were 26, before they gave up and just passed you anyway.
> I believe you went to uni fwiw - and then failed the first year.
Dream on.
>>> - and uni is where most 20 year-olds' social lives are based, mine
>>> included.
>>
>>
>> Utter nonsense. The percentage of people who went to uni when I was
>> 18 was *far* smaller than it is today, so virtually everybody you
>> knew at school still lived and went out in the same area. I got the
>> best of both worlds, because I did that when I was 18 - 21, and
>> then in my mid 20s I sort of got to do the same thing again at uni.
>
> I bet you were an isolated outsider in reality.
Totally wrong, yet again. I knew everybody when I used to go out in
the area I grew up in in my late teens to early 20s - went out 7 days
per week until I was in my mid 20s, unlike you, you boring git sitting
at home arguing on Usenet - what an utter waste of the best years of
your life. At uni in 1st and 2nd years I went out with people from my
block in halls (wrt the people on my course, it was a big group withi
120 people in 1st year, so the mature students taht were about my age
sat together), and after I switched to a different uni in 3rd year I
also went out with people from my halls - and I still go out with some
of those people every couple of months now - when I don't post for an
entire weekend that's normally because I've gone down to see them, and
the person who's helping me to learn how to trade is the first person
I met at that uni because he was living on my corridor in halls. So
not an isolated outsider at all.
> You have all the hallmarks of one.
In reality, you know nothign about me.
jamie powell
>>
>> I bet you were an isolated outsider in reality.
>
>
> Totally wrong, yet again. I knew everybody when I used to go out in the area
> I grew up in in my late teens to early 20s - went out 7 days per week until
> I was in my mid 20s, unlike you, you boring git sitting at home arguing on
> Usenet - what an utter waste of the best years of your life. At uni in 1st
> and 2nd years I went out with people from my block in halls (wrt the people
> on my course, it was a big group withi 120 people in 1st year, so the mature
> students taht were about my age sat together), and after I switched to a
> different uni in 3rd year I also went out with people from my halls - and I
> still go out with some of those people every couple of months now - when I
> don't post for an entire weekend that's normally because I've gone down to
> see them, and the person who's helping me to learn how to trade is the first
> person I met at that uni because he was living on my corridor in halls. So
> not an isolated outsider at all.
>
>
>> You have all the hallmarks of one.
>
>
> In reality, you know nothign about me.
Yawn. You can make up all the bullshit you want to make up, but you already
*know* what I think.
Fact is - I'm at uni, you're not.
Fact is - I have a bright future, you currently don't.
Fact is - I have a partner and a social life, you don't.
Fact is - I'm young. You're not.
You're clinging to the groudnless assumption that I have no friends or social
life, never go out etc, because it brings you comfort. But, like all the other
horrible things you've said about me, it's all in your imagination - wishful
thinking from a small, bitter and nasty man.
You've been posting on these groups, and piling extra shit onto your pissant
website, for many years - close to a decade I'd say.
It's been a *total* waste of your energies, not just because you've made a
fool of yourself in almost every instance, but also because your energies
could have been directed to somewhere useful instead.
Once you face the fact that you're a much more average, unremarkable human
being than your lofty delusions-of-competence would try and have everyone
believe, you'll find it much easier to join the real world, gain respect, and
to do a job which fulfills your own personal potential.
Hospital radio perhaps?
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7ht119F...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> I bet you were an isolated outsider in reality.
>>
>>
>> Totally wrong, yet again. I knew everybody when I used to go out in
>> the area I grew up in in my late teens to early 20s - went out 7
>> days per week until I was in my mid 20s, unlike you, you boring git
>> sitting at home arguing on Usenet - what an utter waste of the best
>> years of your life. At uni in 1st and 2nd years I went out with
>> people from my block in halls (wrt the people on my course, it was
>> a big group withi 120 people in 1st year, so the mature students
>> taht were about my age sat together), and after I switched to a
>> different uni in 3rd year I also went out with people from my
>> halls - and I still go out with some of those people every couple
>> of months now - when I don't post for an entire weekend that's
>> normally because I've gone down to see them, and the person who's
>> helping me to learn how to trade is the first person I met at that
>> uni because he was living on my corridor in halls. So not an
>> isolated outsider at all.
>>
>>
>>> You have all the hallmarks of one.
>>
>>
>> In reality, you know nothign about me.
>
>
> Yawn. You can make up all the bullshit you want to make up, but you
> already *know* what I think.
> Fact is - I'm at uni, you're not.
Very true. I finished years ago, son.
> Fact is - I have a bright future, you currently don't.
Currently maybe I don't, but only because I'm currently learnign how
to trade, and it's not guaranteed that I will be able to master it.
I'm quite optimistic that I will be able to master it though, and if I
can then money shouldn't be a concern.
> Fact is - I have a partner and a social life, you don't.
I do have a social life.
> Fact is - I'm young. You're not.
Can't argue with that one, Jimbo.
> You're clinging to the groudnless assumption that I have no friends
> or social life, never go out etc, because it brings you comfort.
No, I'm just commenting on what you said in response to me suggesting
that you should be out doing the whole sex, drugs and rock'n'roll
thing when you're your age, and your response made you sound like
you're just a boring slipper wearing, Horlicks drinking, soppy romance
book reading git. You ARE wasting every precious minute of the best
years of your life when you're on Usenet though, I'll guarantee you
that.
> But, like all the other horrible things you've said about me,
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, poor Jamiekins doens't like me to say anything
about him at all, but he thinks it's fine to continually call me an
imbecile who can't pass a degree and has no friends and no life and is
a bum and is a drop out etc etc etc etc.
> it's all in your imagination - wishful thinking from a small, bitter
> and nasty man.
Yawn.
> You've been posting on these groups, and piling extra shit onto your
> pissant website, for many years - close to a decade I'd say.
> It's been a *total* waste of your energies, not just because you've
> made a fool of yourself in almost every instance, but also because
> your energies could have been directed to somewhere useful instead.
I should have put my energies to better use, I'll give you that one.
> Once you face the fact that you're a much more average, unremarkable
> human being than your lofty delusions-of-competence would try and
> have everyone believe,
That would require me to delude myself, which I don't go in for.
> you'll find it much easier to join the real world, gain respect, and
> to do a job which fulfills your own personal potential.
> Hospital radio perhaps?
Do they do DAB?
J G Miller
> so why not just agree to disagree and call it a day.
It appears that your thread has had exactly the opposite effect which
you apparently were seeking to achieve.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
Me too, my mum used to watch it. I always got the impression that the title
was actually a pre-emptive apology to the viewers from the programme controller.
B2003
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
Oh well, it was worth a try. Unfortunately both dabsworth and jaimee want
to have the last word so this could rumble on for a while I suspect.
B2003
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>but in reality they're still children. You want to spend a year
>surrounded by 18 year olds when you're 26, like I did in my first year
Very true. I wouldn't be able to spend more than 5 minutes with my 18 year old
self before I'd want to give him a good kicking for being such an irritating,
naive twat. Of course some people would say nothings changed :)
Seriously though , most people when they're 18 are full of shit and its only
as you get older you realise how unsophisticated you really were at that age.
B2003
jamie powell
>>
>> Yawn. You can make up all the bullshit you want to make up, but you already
>> *know* what I think.
>> Fact is - I'm at uni, you're not.
>
>
> Very true. I finished years ago, son.
You failed years ago. we know...
>> Fact is - I have a bright future, you currently don't.
>
>
> Currently maybe I don't, but only because I'm currently learnign how to
> trade, and it's not guaranteed that I will be able to master it. I'm quite
> optimistic that I will be able to master it though, and if I can then money
> shouldn't be a concern.
It's beyond you - so don't waste your time. (I don't believe it's real
anyway).
>> You're clinging to the groudnless assumption that I have no friends or
>> social life, never go out etc, because it brings you comfort.
>
>
>
> No, I'm just commenting on what you said in response to me suggesting that
> you should be out doing the whole sex, drugs and rock'n'roll thing when
> you're your age, and your response made you sound like you're just a boring
> slipper wearing, Horlicks drinking, soppy romance book reading git.
I've said nothing about horlicks, slippers or romance novels - your brain is
malfunctioning again. I go out with friends more than your mum would even let
you if you had any.
> You ARE wasting every precious minute of the best years of your life when
> you're on Usenet though, I'll guarantee you that.
And you're not??!!! At least what I post on usenet is correct, whereas what
you post is drivel.
> Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, poor Jamiekins doens't like me to say anything about
> him at all, but he thinks it's fine to continually call me an imbecile who
> can't pass a degree and has no friends and no life and is a bum and is a
> drop out etc etc etc etc.
You actually *are* all of those things though.
>> You've been posting on these groups, and piling extra shit onto your
>> pissant website, for many years - close to a decade I'd say.
>> It's been a *total* waste of your energies, not just because you've made a
>> fool of yourself in almost every instance, but also because your energies
>> could have been directed to somewhere useful instead.
>
>
> I should have put my energies to better use, I'll give you that one.
Just think of all the floors you could've swept, and the literally hundreds of
pounds you could've earned.
>> Once you face the fact that you're a much more average, unremarkable human
>> being than your lofty delusions-of-competence would try and have everyone
>> believe,
>
>
> That would require me to delude myself, which I don't go in for.
Actually, your current self-view is the deluded one. You've also deluded
yourself into thinking you're not deluded.
>> you'll find it much easier to join the real world, gain respect, and to do
>> a job which fulfills your own personal potential.
>> Hospital radio perhaps?
>
>
> Do they do DAB?
Nah - it's just some amateur sitting in a tatty hospital room, talking rubbish
to an audience of near-zero on a wired network - so it'd be right up your
street in other words.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>Nah - it's just some amateur sitting in a tatty hospital room, talking rubbish
>to an audience of near-zero on a wired network - so it'd be right up your
That pretty much sums most of them up and I speak as someone who gave it
a try for a couple of months many moons ago. Even the ones who do "listen"
are usually half comatose on morphine or something so you could play Slayer
and they wouldn't even notice. Oddly though Radio Redhill (which I didn't
belong to) is a proper MW broadcast station with a signal that goes a flippin
long way. No idea how they wangled that one.
B2003
Richard Evans
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7ht5bkF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> Yawn. You can make up all the bullshit you want to make up, but
>>> you already *know* what I think.
>>> Fact is - I'm at uni, you're not.
>>
>>
>> Very true. I finished years ago, son.
>
> You failed years ago. we know...
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
Shush.
>>> Fact is - I have a bright future, you currently don't.
>>
>>
>> Currently maybe I don't, but only because I'm currently learnign
>> how to trade, and it's not guaranteed that I will be able to master
>> it. I'm quite optimistic that I will be able to master it though,
>> and if I can then money shouldn't be a concern.
>
> It's beyond you - so don't waste your time. (I don't believe it's
> real anyway).
Ironically, today is one of my most profitable days to date.
>> You ARE wasting every precious minute of the best years of your
>> life when you're on Usenet though, I'll guarantee you that.
>
> And you're not??!!! At least what I post on usenet is correct,
> whereas what you post is drivel.
In the large majority of your replies to me you've claimed I don't
have a degree and/or couldn't get a degree. However:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip.
Therefore, you're the one who comes out with drivel.
J G Miller
> Sometimes it's best just to highlight all their posts and mark as Read.
I wish to nominate you for the "Best On Topic Advice In A Thread" award
for 2009.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jam
>es).zip
>
>Shush.
Loughborough, Lancaster, Imperial the OU *and* an institute??
One was enough for me and I've done alright. And the topics on that OU
course look pretty similar to the luffy one , why did you bother?
B2003
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9cq64$pfh$1...@aioe.org...
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:41:52 +0100
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>>but in reality they're still children. You want to spend a year
>>surrounded by 18 year olds when you're 26, like I did in my first
>>year
>
> Very true. I wouldn't be able to spend more than 5 minutes with my
> 18 year old
> self before I'd want to give him a good kicking for being such an
> irritating,
> naive twat.
In 3rd year I was on a corridor in halls of residence and there were
two 18 year old 1st years on the same corridor, and every few minutes
when they were both there you'd hear a load of crashes and bangs from
the other end of the corridor, because they used to continually attack
each other, play fight, throw things at each other, have water fights
and food fights and play practical jokes on one another - non fucking
stop.
And they were just ONE year younger than a certain person who posts on
this NG called Jamie.
One thign I did notice though is that there's a huge difference in
maturity between 1st and 3rd years at uni, so people do grow up a hell
of a lot whilst they're there.
> Of course some people would say nothings changed :)
>
> Seriously though , most people when they're 18 are full of shit and
> its only
> as you get older you realise how unsophisticated you really were at
> that age.
Completely agree.
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9d5q0$8us$1...@aioe.org...
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:44:01 +0100
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>>http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jam
>>es).zip
>>
>>Shush.
>
> Loughborough, Lancaster, Imperial the OU *and* an institute??
There wasn't an institute (or at least I can't remember one!) - it was
Uni of Central Lancashire, Loughborough, Lancaster, Imperial, in that
order (Central Lancashire is where I did my foundation year because I
didn't have the right A-levels to get on an engineernig degree (I did
a BTEC in business studies at college)).
> One was enough for me and I've done alright.
I enjoyed the learning part of it - it's probably different when you
do it as a mature student.
> And the topics on that OU
> course look pretty similar to the luffy one , why did you bother?
I started doing mechanical engineering at Loughborough, but at the end
of 2nd year I decided I wanted to do electronics, but I also didn't
want to start all over again and lose the marks I'd got in 1st and 2nd
years, and doing mechatronics (which stands for mechanical and
electronic engineering) at Lancaster allowed me to keep my marks
whilst doing a mainly electronics-based degree for 3rd and 4th years.
The OU courses I did were to cover subjects that I would've done on an
electronic engineering course that I missed out on because I did mech
eng.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote:
>There wasn't an institute (or at least I can't remember one!) - it was
Institute of mechanical engineers or something I saw.
B2003
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9d9gn$e61$1...@aioe.org...
Ah, right, sorry - that was an award for being the "best student on
course". There wasn't many people on my course at Lancaster though, so
that wasn't as good as it might sound (it was mainly included to piss
off Jamie a bit more than if I hadn't included it! ;-)).
Silk
Evidence, if any were needed, that there was never a golden age for TV
sitcoms - they've always been a pile of cack.
jamie powell
>>
>> You failed years ago. we know...
>
>
> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
>
> Shush.
rofl! photoshop-tastic!
At least we know you have access to a mediocre-quality colour bubblejet
printer now... :p
J G Miller
> they've always been a pile of cack.
You never watched ATV's "The Squirrels"?
DAB sounds worse than FM
What a pathetic response - and how utterly predictable.
Anyway, you feel free to carry on claiming that I don't have a degree
and/or that I'm thick, and I'll just paste that link as a response
every time, because nobody is going to think that I Photoshopped those
documents other than Jamie the Desperado who's claimed so many times
that I haven't got a degree that accusing me of using Photoshop is
basically your one and only optino to avoid having to admit that
you've made a complete twat of yourself.
BTW, I have to admit that I inadvertantly misled you about my maths
exam results. From recollection I thought I'd got 100%, 95% and 95%,
making an average of 97%. But I noticed today that I actually got
100%, 97% and 97%, making an average of 98% - I must've got mixed up
between average mark and lowest mark. Apologies for that. 98% is still
a bit low compared to my 99.5% average result in two thermodynamics
exams though. Not bad, even though I say so myself - especially
considering that a third of the group of 120 people in 1st year failed
the first thermo exam, which I got 100% in.
Enjoy your bedtime mug of Horlicks.
jamie powell
>
>
> What a pathetic response - and how utterly predictable.
You post half-arsed 3rd rate fake results papers and expect anything less?
> Anyway, you feel free to carry on claiming that I don't have a degree and/or
> that I'm thick, and I'll just paste that link as a response every time,
> because nobody is going to think that I Photoshopped those documents other
> than Jamie the Desperado who's claimed so many times that I haven't got a
> degree that accusing me of using Photoshop is basically your one and only
> optino to avoid having to admit that you've made a complete twat of
> yourself.
zomg really?!!???!!!!111
Oh, no, wait, it's just another of your delusions. yeay.
> BTW, I have to admit that I inadvertantly misled you about my maths exam
> results. From recollection I thought I'd got 100%, 95% and 95%, making an
> average of 97%. But I noticed today that I actually got 100%, 97% and 97%,
> making an average of 98% - I must've got mixed up between average mark and
> lowest mark. Apologies for that. 98% is still
In other words you forgot the details of your earlier lie when you were faking
the results papers, and now feel desperate to cover it up. You should've kept
quiet about it - your non-existent audience would never have noticed.
> a bit low compared to my 99.5% average result in two thermodynamics exams
> though. Not bad, even though I say so myself - especially considering that a
> third of the group of 120 people in 1st year failed the first thermo exam,
> which I got 100% in.
>
> Enjoy your bedtime mug of Horlicks.
Enjoy your nightly self-administered dose of sad, empty and wholly-undeserved
smugness and self-esteem, as you continue to fester away in your mother's
house, wasting yet another night of your crumbling and derelict life in
self-deluded fantasyland.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7hvns1F...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> What a pathetic response - and how utterly predictable.
>
> You post half-arsed 3rd rate fake results papers and expect anything
> less?
You know perfectly well that these are real, but you *have to* lie in
order to avoid admitting that you've made a complete twat of yourself.
Unfortunately for you, though, you've already made a twat of yourself.
BTW, that offer of a bet's still open if you want it - and you've got
the advantage of knowing what my results are, and I'll still allow you
to name your price and I'll match that, i.e. IF you had higher exam
results than me then you could take every penny off me and force me to
go bankrupt - that's how confident I am that you wouldn't have got
higher results than me. There's 0.000000000000000000000000000000001%
chance that you got higher results, Jimbo, which makes it quite a safe
bet.
>> Anyway, you feel free to carry on claiming that I don't have a
>> degree and/or that I'm thick, and I'll just paste that link as a
>> response every time, because nobody is going to think that I
>> Photoshopped those documents other than Jamie the Desperado who's
>> claimed so many times that I haven't got a degree that accusing me
>> of using Photoshop is basically your one and only optino to avoid
>> having to admit that you've made a complete twat of yourself.
>
> zomg really?!!???!!!!111
> Oh, no, wait, it's just another of your delusions. yeay.
You what? You want to see my results? I thought you'd already seen
them once, but here you go anyway:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
>> BTW, I have to admit that I inadvertantly misled you about my maths
>> exam results. From recollection I thought I'd got 100%, 95% and
>> 95%, making an average of 97%. But I noticed today that I actually
>> got 100%, 97% and 97%, making an average of 98% - I must've got
>> mixed up between average mark and lowest mark. Apologies for that.
>> 98% is still
>
> In other words you forgot the details of your earlier lie when you
> were faking the results papers, and now feel desperate to cover it
> up. You should've kept quiet about it - your non-existent audience
> would never have noticed.
You mean this?:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
>> a bit low compared to my 99.5% average result in two thermodynamics
>> exams though. Not bad, even though I say so myself - especially
>> considering that a third of the group of 120 people in 1st year
>> failed the first thermo exam, which I got 100% in.
>>
>> Enjoy your bedtime mug of Horlicks.
>
> Enjoy your nightly self-administered dose of sad, empty and
> wholly-undeserved smugness and self-esteem, as you continue to
> fester away in your mother's house, wasting yet another night of
> your crumbling and derelict life in self-deluded fantasyland.
You want to see my results *again*? Very well:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
jamie powell
>
>>
>> Enjoy your nightly self-administered dose of sad, empty and
>> wholly-undeserved smugness and self-esteem, as you continue to fester away
>> in your mother's house, wasting yet another night of your crumbling and
>> derelict life in self-deluded fantasyland.
>
>
> You want to see my results *again*? Very well:
>
> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
QED.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>news:7hvns1F...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> What a pathetic response - and how utterly predictable.
>
>You post half-arsed 3rd rate fake results papers and expect anything less?
Having been to one of those unis myself (and I'm not going to say which)
the certificates look pretty genuine to me. TBH I can't see even Dabsworth
going to the not incosiderate trouble of faking all that stuff up just to
win an online argument with a teenager. While he may make a tit of himself
on a regular basis on here his academic knowledge seems pretty solid to me.
B2003
jamie powell
<bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9fb86$q0q$1...@aioe.org...
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:17:53 +0100
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>>news:7hvns1F...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>>
>>> What a pathetic response - and how utterly predictable.
>>
>>You post half-arsed 3rd rate fake results papers and expect anything less?
>
> Having been to one of those unis myself (and I'm not going to say which)
> the certificates look pretty genuine to me.
They're not like mine (from Manchester) and they could easily have been
faked - even you must surely acknowledge that.
> TBH I can't see even Dabsworth
> going to the not incosiderate trouble of faking all that stuff up just to
> win an online argument with a teenager.
It does sound ridiculously pathetic, but this is Dabsworthless we're talking
about - those big delusions of his take a *lot* of feeding, and he's obsessive
and dishonest enough to do this.
btw, I'm 20 now, so not a teenager anymore.
> While he may make a tit of himself
> on a regular basis on here his academic knowledge seems pretty solid to me.
Specifically which "knowledge" are you referring to? - please provide
examples.
I've been monitoring his posts for more than a year now, and the technical
detail contained within seldom makes it beyond 'wikipedia level'. Plus he gets
things wrong all the time.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>They're not like mine (from Manchester) and they could easily have been
>faked - even you must surely acknowledge that.
Anything can be faked. It doesn't mean it was. And if you were going to fake
some certificates would you choose the OU as one of your alma maters?
>Specifically which "knowledge" are you referring to? - please provide
>examples.
I've got better things to do than revisit the last few hundred dabsworth posts
TBH. Its just the impression I got from reading some of his posts. If I'm wrong
so be it, I won't loose any sleep over it.
B2003
jamie powell
<bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9fv4n$jn3$1...@aioe.org...
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:49:24 +0100
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>They're not like mine (from Manchester) and they could easily have been
>>faked - even you must surely acknowledge that.
>
> Anything can be faked. It doesn't mean it was. And if you were going to fake
> some certificates would you choose the OU as one of your alma maters?
My suspicion is that he actually *did* enrol with the OU at some stage, hence
its inclusion in his little masquerade.
>>Specifically which "knowledge" are you referring to? - please provide
>>examples.
>
> I've got better things to do than revisit the last few hundred dabsworth
> posts
> TBH. Its just the impression I got from reading some of his posts. If I'm
> wrong
> so be it, I won't loose any sleep over it.
Somehow I didn't think you'd be able to find any. :p
DAB sounds worse than FM
Precisely - those pictures are proof of my qualifications that you've
claimed I don't have. They don't prove that I got higher average exam
results than you, but as I say, I'm willing to bet everything to my
name that they are higher than yours.
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9fb86$q0q$1...@aioe.org...
Thank you. And you're absolutely right, no-one in their right mind
would attempt to fake those documents just to win an argument on
Usenet against someone who was a teenager last year.
Silk
> Silk's a homophobic racist, so I'm surprised you two get on so well.
I will admit that I believe homosexuality to be fundamentally wrong.
That's just being honest. Would you prefer me to be a hypocrite?
From where I'm sat, you're the one picking on Jamie's sexual preference
in a way that can only be described as bullying.
A few weeks back, I had no idea Jamie was gay and I didn't really care,
now I know, I still don't care. It's totally irellevant to the discussion.
I can't really say I'm surprised you've changed the subject really as
you've so spectacularly lost the argument elsewhere.
I'll ignore the racism accusation as it doesn't even merit a reply.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>> Having been to one of those unis myself (and I'm not going to say
>> which)
>> the certificates look pretty genuine to me.
>
> They're not like mine (from Manchester) and they could easily have
> been faked - even you must surely acknowledge that.
Jimmy, here's a few assignments and other coursework documents from my
MSc at Imperial:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/imperial_docs.zip
All of those documents were written on a computer called "Steve", and
some of those documents have my name on them. And for some of the
files, the document Properties say that the document hasn't been
modified since 2000/2001. For example, in the document Properties for
"pdf Lab report.doc", which has my name in the text of the document,
the document Properties say that it was created and last modified on
24th November 2000.
If you look at the bottom of my MSc degree certificate, it's dated
"1st November 2001".
Are you claiming that I've "faked" those assignment documents as well?
When you're in a hole, it's best to stop digging. You're in a very
deep hole, Jimbo, so I'd put your shovel down if I were you, son.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:h9fb86$q0q$1...@aioe.org...
>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:17:53 +0100
>> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>>"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>>>news:7hvns1F...@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What a pathetic response - and how utterly predictable.
>>>
>>>You post half-arsed 3rd rate fake results papers and expect
>>>anything less?
>>
>> Having been to one of those unis myself (and I'm not going to say
>> which)
>> the certificates look pretty genuine to me.
>
> They're not like mine (from Manchester) and they could easily have
> been faked - even you must surely acknowledge that.
Whilst I'm on the subject of Imperial, I might as well describe my
fake journey to fake uni every fake morning. I cycled about 6 fake
miles to uni every morning from the fake postgrad halls of residence
at a place called Clayponds in South Ealing. Out of the halls of
residence, I turned left and went through the council estate, then
turned left to go along the cycle track underneath the M4 - there was
a tramp living under the M4 who'd built his own house out of cardboard
and other stuff, and he was somewhat dishevelled and in need of a
shave. I then went across the island, which I think is the start of
the North Circular (not sure). I then went along that road to
Chiswick, which is pretty posh, and there's lots of shops and pubs. I
remember there was a moped shop at the far end of Chiswick. Next place
of note is Hammersmith, where you go round the one way system, and the
underground station is on your right at the lights (on the way back
you have to go round a very busy one way bit which for a cyclist is
fucking dangerous because it's multiple lanes and the cars go quite
fast when there isn't much traffic and when there's traffic it's a
nightmare to weave through the cars). Then I think it was flat for a
bit before you have to go up a big hill, and at the top of the hill
you get to Kensington High Street, which is also posh and has loads of
shops, and you sometimes had people demonstrating there for some
unknown reason. I think there was another uphill bit and once you get
to the top of that, on the left hand side there's a famous park with a
famous statue of a famous king, or maybe Queen Elizabeth, can't
remember, and you pass the Albert Hall on the right hand side. I
turned right after the Albert Hall, and you have to go through an area
where it appears there's loads of foreign embassies, because the
police were sometimes there and they sometimes close streets off. Then
you turn right onto the street that Imperial's on, then you turn right
into Imperial and cycle along the walkway to the elec eng building,
which is an ugly tower block type building.
I knew we were going to have this argument about me having a degree,
you see, so I decided to live in London for a year and every weekday I
cycled along the path that a postgrad living in Clayponds would cycle
along on his 6 mile journey to Imperial just so that I could recount
teh journey in order to win an argument with a 20 year old on Usenet.
I do these things from time to time because, as you keep on reminding
me, I'm a bum with bugger all else to do with my time. I think I'll
fly to Boston next and have a fake year at MIT and I'll tell you all
about it when I get home.
DAB sounds worse than FM
Just remembered that you go past Kensington Olympia where they have
shows and all that kind of shit which I think was before you get to
Kensington High Street, and it was on the left hand side (on the way
to Imperial). And just after there is where I had a near-death
experience when a car turned right and didn't see me at all even
though I had my lights on and I had to swerve rapidly to avoid being
knocked off, for which the car driver received the finger and a few of
the strongest obscenities known to man from yours truly. Must've been
someone from the BBC out to get me even before I'd got DAB.
jamie powell
>
> Thank you. And you're absolutely right, no-one in their right mind would
> attempt to fake those documents just to win an argument on Usenet against
> someone who was a teenager last year.
I'm glad you've acknowledged that - facing the fact that you're not in your
right mind will be an important part of your psychiatric treatment.
jamie powell
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:h9enhd$4ko$1...@aioe.org...
>>
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>> news:7hvupdF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy your nightly self-administered dose of sad, empty and
>>>> wholly-undeserved smugness and self-esteem, as you continue to fester
>>>> away in your mother's house, wasting yet another night of your crumbling
>>>> and derelict life in self-deluded fantasyland.
>>>
>>>
>>> You want to see my results *again*? Very well:
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
>>
>>
>> QED.
>
>
> Precisely - those pictures are proof of my qualifications that you've
> claimed I don't have. They don't prove that I got higher average exam
> results than you, but as I say, I'm willing to bet everything to my name
> that they are higher than yours.
Nice try, simpleton.
QED of course refers to your proving my point - that you live in a
self-deluded fantasyland - by pasting the faked results over and over again.
jamie powell
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:h9ftcm$hah$1...@aioe.org...
>>
>> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9fb86$q0q$1...@aioe.org...
>
>>> Having been to one of those unis myself (and I'm not going to say which)
>>> the certificates look pretty genuine to me.
>>
>> They're not like mine (from Manchester) and they could easily have been
>> faked - even you must surely acknowledge that.
>
>
> Jimmy, here's a few assignments and other coursework documents from my MSc
> at Imperial:
>
> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/imperial_docs.zip
>
> All of those documents were written on a computer called "Steve", and some
> of those documents have my name on them. And for some of the files, the
> document Properties say that the document hasn't been modified since
> 2000/2001. For example, in the document Properties for "pdf Lab report.doc",
> which has my name in the text of the document, the document Properties say
> that it was created and last modified on 24th November 2000.
>
> If you look at the bottom of my MSc degree certificate, it's dated "1st
> November 2001".
>
> Are you claiming that I've "faked" those assignment documents as well?
>
> When you're in a hole, it's best to stop digging. You're in a very deep
> hole, Jimbo, so I'd put your shovel down if I were you, son.
rofl. Just how thick *are* you? It's exceedingly simple to add fake details to
Word documents, as anyone with even a smattering of technical knowledge would
already know.
jamie powell
Sorry Steven, but I'm just not convinced. That's right - describing bicycle
journeys which anyone could make won't work either.
jamie powell
>
> Just remembered that you go past Kensington Olympia where they have shows
> and all that kind of shit which I think was before you get to Kensington
> High Street, and it was on the left hand side (on the way to Imperial).
I guess it's easy to miss these things when you're frantically trying to map
out a fake route on Google earth and/or streetview to maintain your crumbling
false-image.
DAB sounds worse than FM
So you're claiming that all of the contents of both Zip files was
faked:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/imperial_docs.zip
You really are showing yourself up now.
DAB sounds worse than FM
I've just Googled and found that you're right.
Okay then, are you claiming that I "faked" all of those assignment
documents? If you are claiming that, could you enlighten me as to why
I would just happened to have numerous assignments for exactly the
same MSc course I've always said I've had on my computer?
DAB sounds worse than FM
This is ridiculous, and I don't even believe that you think I didn't
get any degrees any more, and all you're doing is desperately denying
everything just to avoid admitting that you're wrong.
I'm not going to bother convincing you, and from now on if you want to
claim that I didn't get the degrees I say I've got, or if you claim
I'm thick, I'll just post links to those Zip files, because I'm
perfectly happy for people to decide for themselves about whether I'm
telling the truth or not - because if you really don't believe me,
you'll be on your own in not believing me, because it's just pure
idiocy to think that I would forge degree certificates and then just
happen to have a load of assignment documents on my computer.
DAB sounds worse than FM
Of course anybody could make such a bike journey, but the point is why
on earth would I know the precise details of a journey that someone
who lives in Imperial's postgrad halls of residence would take if they
cycled to uni?
But as I said in my last post, I'm not going to try and convince you
any longer - you know I've got those degrees, and you know taht my
marks are far higher than you got, but you're just trying to avoid
admitting so.
J G Miller
> then you turn right into Imperial and cycle along the walkway to
> the elec eng building, which is an ugly tower block type building.
Did you know Professor Eric Laithwaite then?
jamie powell
"Silk" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:h9g6a8$uf9$1...@aioe.org...
>
> I will admit that I believe homosexuality to be fundamentally wrong.
pfft. okay, but do you at least accept that:
1) homosexuality *isn't* a choice
2) homosexuality does no harm to others
> That's just being honest. Would you prefer me to be a hypocrite?
>
> From where I'm sat, you're the one picking on Jamie's sexual preference in a
> way that can only be described as bullying.
>
> A few weeks back, I had no idea Jamie was gay and I didn't really care, now
> I know, I still don't care. It's totally irellevant to the discussion.
>
> I can't really say I'm surprised you've changed the subject really as you've
> so spectacularly lost the argument elsewhere.
Yes I think that sums it up - I've made a fool of him repeatedly and he's
trying to hit back at me, basically.
jamie powell
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:h9gim6$e5p$1...@aioe.org...
>>
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>> news:7i1u6mF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> Just remembered that you go past Kensington Olympia where they have shows
>>> and all that kind of shit which I think was before you get to Kensington
>>> High Street, and it was on the left hand side (on the way to Imperial).
>>
>> I guess it's easy to miss these things when you're frantically trying to
>> map out a fake route on Google earth and/or streetview to maintain your
>> crumbling false-image.
>
>
> This is ridiculous, and I don't even believe that you think I didn't get any
> degrees any more, and all you're doing is desperately denying everything
> just to avoid admitting that you're wrong.
nah, bollocks.
> I'm not going to bother convincing you, and from now on if you want to claim
> that I didn't get the degrees I say I've got, or if you claim I'm thick,
> I'll just post links to those Zip files,
That's handy, isn't it. Whenever I expose you for having posted crap about a
subject which you claim to be qualified in, rather than have to try and defend
yourself, you'll just keep pasting links to your fake documents?
Why bother posting on usenet at all if you can't even be bothered putting on
the show anymore?
> because I'm perfectly happy for people to decide for themselves about
> whether I'm telling the truth or not - because if you really don't believe
> me, you'll be on your own in not believing me, because it's just pure idiocy
> to think that I would forge degree certificates and then just happen to have
> a load of assignment documents on my computer.
Well, I'm sure there'll be people here who'll believe you, but that's only
because the people on here don't really know enough to realise when you're
spouting a load of total hogwash.
As another poster (I forget his name) quite rightly said a few weeks back,
most of the normal and the knowledgeable folk have been scared away from here,
because of some deranged ogre ranting and shouting abuse from inside his
mother's house.
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:pan.2009.09...@yoyo.ORG...
No. I was only there for one year, and the only lecturers we came into
contact with were the ones that lectured us on communications and
signal processing, and I definitely don't remember a Professor
Laithwaite.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "Silk" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:h9g6a8$uf9$1...@aioe.org...
>>
>> I will admit that I believe homosexuality to be fundamentally
>> wrong.
>
> pfft. okay, but do you at least accept that:
> 1) homosexuality *isn't* a choice
> 2) homosexuality does no harm to others
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, the
question that a gay person should surely ask when a homophobe says
that homosexuality is "fundamentally wrong" is "why do you think it is
fundamentally wrong?", not "oh, that's okay, Silk, queer bashers are
okay in my book so long as they don't like Steven".
>> That's just being honest. Would you prefer me to be a hypocrite?
>>
>> From where I'm sat, you're the one picking on Jamie's sexual
>> preference in a way that can only be described as bullying.
Utter fucking bullshit. At no point have I "bullied" Jamie about him
being gay. The thing I was critical of was how his relationship
started, because it was with someone at least 10 years older than him
and he was only 15/16. The same thing would apply to a
heterosexual/homosexual 15/16 year old male/female with a 26+ year old
male/female - i.e. what I said was *totally independent* of sexuality.
>> A few weeks back, I had no idea Jamie was gay and I didn't really
>> care, now I know, I still don't care. It's totally irellevant to
>> the discussion.
>>
>> I can't really say I'm surprised you've changed the subject really
>> as you've so spectacularly lost the argument elsewhere.
>
> Yes I think that sums it up - I've made a fool of him repeatedly and
> he's trying to hit back at me, basically.
Oh, the irony of claiming that you've won an argument when all you can
say in response to me providing pictures of my degree certificates and
high exam results is that I faked them.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7i229tF...@mid.individual.net...
>> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:h9gim6$e5p$1...@aioe.org...
>>>
>>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>>> news:7i1u6mF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> Just remembered that you go past Kensington Olympia where they
>>>> have shows and all that kind of shit which I think was before you
>>>> get to Kensington High Street, and it was on the left hand side
>>>> (on the way to Imperial).
>>>
>>> I guess it's easy to miss these things when you're frantically
>>> trying to map out a fake route on Google earth and/or streetview
>>> to maintain your crumbling false-image.
>>
>>
>> This is ridiculous, and I don't even believe that you think I
>> didn't get any degrees any more, and all you're doing is
>> desperately denying everything just to avoid admitting that you're
>> wrong.
>
> nah, bollocks.
Nah, you know full well that those papers are legit.
>> I'm not going to bother convincing you, and from now on if you want
>> to claim that I didn't get the degrees I say I've got, or if you
>> claim I'm thick, I'll just post links to those Zip files,
>
> That's handy, isn't it. Whenever I expose you for having posted crap
> about a subject which you claim to be qualified in,
When have you EVER "exposed" me for posting crap about a subject I'm
qualified in? Pointing out that you can combine the left and right FM
stereo channels to get the mono signal back again isn't something "I'm
qualified in", because I was never taught the theory of FM at uni. My
MSc was purely about digital, and I don't even think I've ever seen
you even pass comment about anything to do with digital
communications, and the only time we've crossed swords about anything
to do with digital audio you came out with pure idiotic nonsense about
MP2 supposedly being better than NICAM. You also came out with a right
load of bollocks about CDs being shit, and although I wasn't the one
correcting you, you were well and truly put in your place.
You know absolutely nothing about digital audio or digital
communications.
> rather than have to try and defend yourself, you'll just keep
> pasting links to your fake documents?
I've said exactly when I will post links to those Zip files, and it
will be whenever you try to claim that I don't have any degrees and/or
when you claim that I'm thick. I have never said that I will post
links to those Zip files just in ordinary discussion, and I certainly
don't need to post them to beat you in an argument about any subject
related to this NG.
> Why bother posting on usenet at all if you can't even be bothered
> putting on the show anymore?
>
>
>> because I'm perfectly happy for people to decide for themselves
>> about whether I'm telling the truth or not - because if you really
>> don't believe me, you'll be on your own in not believing me,
>> because it's just pure idiocy to think that I would forge degree
>> certificates and then just happen to have a load of assignment
>> documents on my computer.
>
> Well, I'm sure there'll be people here who'll believe you, but
> that's only because the people on here don't really know enough to
> realise when you're spouting a load of total hogwash.
> As another poster (I forget his name) quite rightly said a few weeks
> back, most of the normal and the knowledgeable folk have been
> scared away from here, because of some deranged ogre ranting and
> shouting abuse from inside his mother's house.
Ah, you're referring to the person who goes by the name of "Like
Digital Radio", who works in the DAB industry, so he's hardly going to
cheer me on on here now, is he?
jamie powell
>
> Nah, you know full well that those papers are legit.
Nah, bollocks. They're laughably amateurish on the whole, to be honest.
>>> I'm not going to bother convincing you, and from now on if you want to
>>> claim that I didn't get the degrees I say I've got, or if you claim I'm
>>> thick, I'll just post links to those Zip files,
>>
>> That's handy, isn't it. Whenever I expose you for having posted crap about
>> a subject which you claim to be qualified in,
>
>
> When have you EVER "exposed" me for posting crap about a subject I'm
> qualified in? Pointing out that you can combine the left and right FM stereo
> channels to get the mono signal back again isn't something "I'm qualified
> in", because I was never taught the theory of FM at uni. My MSc was purely
> about digital, and I don't even think I've ever seen you even pass comment
> about anything to do with digital
If you can be so totally wrong about something as simple as FM stereo, then
you haven't got a chance with all this much-more-complicated digital stuff.
When have you talked in detail on here about digital broadcast systems? Never.
> communications, and the only time we've crossed swords about anything to do
> with digital audio you came out with pure idiotic nonsense about MP2
> supposedly being better than NICAM. You also came out with a right load of
> bollocks about CDs being shit, and although I wasn't the one correcting you,
> you were well and truly put in your place.
Way to misrepresent my statements in the hope it'll mislead your tiny audience
about me.
What a shame there isn't a GCSE in 'how to mislead' - you'd probably get a C+
if you worked hard at it.
> You know absolutely nothing about digital audio or digital communications.
Dream on. You clearly know nothing about them though.
>> rather than have to try and defend yourself, you'll just keep pasting links
>> to your fake documents?
>
>
> I've said exactly when I will post links to those Zip files, and it will be
> whenever you try to claim that I don't have any degrees and/or when you
> claim that I'm thick. I have never said that I will post links to those Zip
> files just in ordinary discussion, and I certainly don't need to post them
> to beat you in an argument about any subject related to this NG.
As Silk said, you've spectacularly lost myriad arguments on this NG.
I guess your self-delusion system will have erased the memory of all that by
now though.
>> Well, I'm sure there'll be people here who'll believe you, but that's only
>> because the people on here don't really know enough to realise when you're
>> spouting a load of total hogwash.
>> As another poster (I forget his name) quite rightly said a few weeks back,
>> most of the normal and the knowledgeable folk have been scared away from
>> here, because of some deranged ogre ranting and shouting abuse from inside
>> his mother's house.
>
>
> Ah, you're referring to the person who goes by the name of "Like Digital
> Radio", who works in the DAB industry, so he's hardly going to cheer me on
> on here now, is he?
Why should industry members even know about you, let alone care enough to like
or dislike you?
Also, it's convenient for you that, innit. Professionals who work in the radio
industry are not only all wrong, but they automatically hate you because
you've done so much damage to their industry? Could you even *be* any more
deluded?
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7i2b6eF...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> Nah, you know full well that those papers are legit.
>
> Nah, bollocks. They're laughably amateurish on the whole, to be
> honest.
Stop lying. You know as well as everybody else does that those papers
are legit, and that I've got the 3 degrees I say I've got, and I've
got the exam results that wipe the floor with yours. You just don't
want to admit it.
>>>> I'm not going to bother convincing you, and from now on if you
>>>> want to claim that I didn't get the degrees I say I've got, or if
>>>> you claim I'm thick, I'll just post links to those Zip files,
>>>
>>> That's handy, isn't it. Whenever I expose you for having posted
>>> crap about a subject which you claim to be qualified in,
>>
>>
>> When have you EVER "exposed" me for posting crap about a subject
>> I'm qualified in? Pointing out that you can combine the left and
>> right FM stereo channels to get the mono signal back again isn't
>> something "I'm qualified in", because I was never taught the theory
>> of FM at uni. My MSc was purely about digital, and I don't even
>> think I've ever seen you even pass comment about anything to do
>> with digital
>
> If you can be so totally wrong about something as simple as FM
> stereo, then you haven't got a chance with all this
> much-more-complicated digital stuff.
> When have you talked in detail on here about digital broadcast
> systems? Never.
And who would I discuss digital communications theory with on this NG?
Please don't suggest that you could discuss it when you're a bloody
Software Engineering student.
Here's a search of Google Groups for posts by me (my
ste...@totalise.co.uk email address that I still use when I post on
Google Groups today) on the comp.dsp NG:
How much of my posts do you understand? I'll help you with that: you
won't understand a single word of those posts.
Also notice what dates those posts were from - they just happen to
coincide with when I was studying comms and DSP at Imperial or they
were from shortly after that.
Do you claim that I've faked all those posts as well?
>> You know absolutely nothing about digital audio or digital
>> communications.
>
> Dream on. You clearly know nothing about them though.
Let's discuss some of the theory about OFDM in the posts I sent back
in 2001/2 then:
That's a laugh. You absolutely literally don't even know the basics of
the subject - you'd have to take a few maths courses just to be able
to study the basics!!!
>>> rather than have to try and defend yourself, you'll just keep
>>> pasting links to your fake documents?
>>
>>
>> I've said exactly when I will post links to those Zip files, and it
>> will be whenever you try to claim that I don't have any degrees
>> and/or when you claim that I'm thick. I have never said that I will
>> post links to those Zip files just in ordinary discussion, and I
>> certainly don't need to post them to beat you in an argument about
>> any subject related to this NG.
>
> As Silk said, you've spectacularly lost myriad arguments on this NG.
You've also spectacularly lost numerous arguments on this NG - such as
your demonstration of your utter lack of understanding of the basics
about compressed audio when you claimed that MP2 provides higher
quailty than NICAM.
Furthermore, the only arguments I've lost were about utter
inconsequential bullshit, such as combining the left and right FM
stereo channels. Please forgive me for not paying much attention to
such trivial bollocks.
>>> Well, I'm sure there'll be people here who'll believe you, but
>>> that's only because the people on here don't really know enough to
>>> realise when you're spouting a load of total hogwash.
>>> As another poster (I forget his name) quite rightly said a few
>>> weeks back, most of the normal and the knowledgeable folk have
>>> been scared away from here, because of some deranged ogre ranting
>>> and shouting abuse from inside his mother's house.
>>
>>
>> Ah, you're referring to the person who goes by the name of "Like
>> Digital Radio", who works in the DAB industry, so he's hardly going
>> to cheer me on on here now, is he?
>
> Why should industry members even know about you, let alone care
> enough to like or dislike you?
The DAB industry is a small industry, and they're all well aware of
who I am.
> Also, it's convenient for you that, innit. Professionals who work in
> the radio industry are not only all wrong,
They WERE wrong. Of that there can be no doubt - DAB was re-launched
in 2002, then just 3 years later they had to design DAB+ because the
rest fo the world was refusing to follow the UK in using DAB. Look how
long FM and AM have been about - decades. DAB lasted 3 years before
they had to pull the plug on it.
> but they automatically hate you because you've done so much damage
> to their industry? Could you even *be* any more deluded?
I'm a realist.
You're also changing the subject away from the pictures of my degree
certificates and pictures of the letters showing my higher-than-yours
exam results. Let's get back onto the subjec at hand.
jamie powell
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:h9gv8o$s2p$1...@aioe.org...
>>
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>> news:7i2b6eF...@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> Nah, you know full well that those papers are legit.
>>
>> Nah, bollocks. They're laughably amateurish on the whole, to be honest.
>
>
> Stop lying. You know as well as everybody else does that those papers are
> legit, and that I've got the 3 degrees I say I've got, and I've got the exam
> results that wipe the floor with yours. You just don't want to admit it.
I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post anything to
suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've got the grades or
not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and sensibly.
However, on top of that, many of those printouts really are *bad* forgeries.
I bet you created them in a rage - rushed them - and now wish you'd done a
better job.
>>
>> If you can be so totally wrong about something as simple as FM stereo, then
>> you haven't got a chance with all this much-more-complicated digital stuff.
>> When have you talked in detail on here about digital broadcast systems?
>> Never.
>
>
> And who would I discuss digital communications theory with on this NG?
> Please don't suggest that you could discuss it when you're a bloody Software
> Engineering student.
It's a digital radio newsgroup - why not discuss such things?
And what do you know of my course? All you've done is google it and then
glanced at the overview.
> Here's a search of Google Groups for posts by me (my ste...@totalise.co.uk
> email address that I still use when I post on Google Groups today) on the
> comp.dsp NG:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&q=author%3Asteve41%40totalise.co.uk+ofdm+group%3Acomp.dsp&btnG=Search&sitesearch=
>
> How much of my posts do you understand? I'll help you with that: you won't
> understand a single word of those posts.
You rely on people not understanding your 'quackings' - that's the only way
you can appear credible, thus allowing you to bask in the faux limelight this
creates for you, which is of course what you so dearly desire more than
anything else.
I skimmed a few of the posts - I didn't see any high level detail in them.
I spotted a few GCSE equations.
I read some of your opinions, which I have neither the time nor the will to
investigate (your twisted brain will no doubt interpret this as a personal
victory).
> Also notice what dates those posts were from - they just happen to coincide
> with when I was studying comms and DSP at Imperial or they were from shortly
> after that.
>
> Do you claim that I've faked all those posts as well?
See above - your posts are unremarkable.
>>> You know absolutely nothing about digital audio or digital communications.
>>
>> Dream on. You clearly know nothing about them though.
>
>
> Let's discuss some of the theory about OFDM in the posts I sent back in
> 2001/2 then:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&q=author%3Asteve41%40totalise.co.uk+ofdm+group%3Acomp.dsp&btnG=Search&sitesearch=
>
> That's a laugh. You absolutely literally don't even know the basics of the
> subject - you'd have to take a few maths courses just to be able to study
> the basics!!!
I've seen enough of your posts to get a pretty good idea of:
1) how mature you are (very immature)
2) your IQ (pretty average)
3) your level of clue (low-medium)
4) your integrity (low)
5) your honesty (poor)
6) your motivations for posting (narcissism and a desire for attention)
You won't convince me otherwise by clumsily linking to the archive of some old
threads which took place when I was 12. You'll have to do better than that,
Steven.
> You've also spectacularly lost numerous arguments on this NG - such as your
> demonstration of your utter lack of understanding of the basics about
> compressed audio when you claimed that MP2 provides higher quailty than
> NICAM.
Way to misrepresent my statements in the hope it'll mislead your tiny audience
about me.
What a shame there isn't a GCSE in 'how to mislead' - you'd probably get a C+
if you worked hard at it.
>
> Furthermore, the only arguments I've lost were about utter inconsequential
> bullshit, such as combining the left and right FM stereo channels. Please
> forgive me for not paying much attention to such trivial bollocks.
If you can be so totally wrong about something as simple as FM stereo, then
you haven't got a chance with all this much-more-complicated digital stuff.
>>
>> Why should industry members even know about you, let alone care enough to
>> like or dislike you?
>
>
> The DAB industry is a small industry, and they're all well aware of who I
> am.
hahahaha, dream on fool!
>> Also, it's convenient for you that, innit. Professionals who work in the
>> radio industry are not only all wrong,
>
>
> They WERE wrong. Of that there can be no doubt - DAB was re-launched in
> 2002, then just 3 years later they had to design DAB+ because the rest fo
> the world was refusing to follow the UK in using DAB. Look how long FM and
> AM have been about - decades. DAB lasted 3 years before they had to pull the
> plug on it.
It isn't failing for the reasons you think, though.
>> but they automatically hate you because you've done so much damage to their
>> industry? Could you even *be* any more deluded?
>
>
> I'm a realist.
No. You're deluded. Very, very deluded.
> You're also changing the subject away from the pictures of my degree
> certificates and pictures of the letters showing my higher-than-yours exam
> results. Let's get back onto the subjec at hand.
Back to hiding behind your forged documents?
I really do hate dishonesty in all its forms, but frauds, charlatans and
phonies like you make me especially sick, because you masquerade as
professionals, try to gain people's trust, drop them in hot water through your
incompetence, and then walk away with your ego intact and without giving a
toss.
You're nothing more than a Lord Melbury (from Fawlty Towers) type of
character, basically.
J G Miller
> and I definitely don't remember a Professor Laithwaite.
I should have checked the dates --
Laithwaite retired from Imperial College in 1986
He was Professor in Heavy Electrical Engineering and is principally known
for the development of the linear induction motor and Maglev rail system,
but was also well known in the popular media for his spinning gyroscopes.
DAB sounds worse than FM
> I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post
> anything to suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've
> got the grades or not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and
> sensibly.
> However, on top of that, many of those printouts really are *bad*
> forgeries.
> I bet you created them in a rage - rushed them - and now wish you'd
> done a better job.
<snip>
> You rely on people not understanding your 'quackings' - that's the
> only way you can appear credible, thus allowing you to bask in the
> faux limelight this creates for you, which is of course what you so
> dearly desire more than anything else.
>
> I skimmed a few of the posts - I didn't see any high level detail in
> them.
> I spotted a few GCSE equations.
> I read some of your opinions, which I have neither the time nor the
> will to investigate (your twisted brain will no doubt interpret this
> as a personal victory).
<snip>
> I've seen enough of your posts to get a pretty good idea of:
> 1) how mature you are (very immature)
> 2) your IQ (pretty average)
> 3) your level of clue (low-medium)
> 4) your integrity (low)
> 5) your honesty (poor)
> 6) your motivations for posting (narcissism and a desire for
> attention)
>
>
> You won't convince me otherwise by clumsily linking to the archive
> of some old threads which took place when I was 12. You'll have to
> do better than that, Steven.
<snip>
> Back to hiding behind your forged documents?
> I really do hate dishonesty in all its forms, but frauds, charlatans
> and phonies like you make me especially sick, because you masquerade
> as professionals, try to gain people's trust, drop them in hot water
> through your incompetence, and then walk away with your ego intact
> and without giving a toss.
> You're nothing more than a Lord Melbury (from Fawlty Towers) type of
> character, basically.
Yet another rant by Jamie, accusing me of being thick and that my
degree certificates and letters with my exam results on are "faked".
There's as much chance of you admitting that I do have degrees and
that my exam results are far higher than yours as there is of seani
acting reasonably in a discussion about me, so there's no point in
discussing this with you, and I'll do as I said I would and just post
links to my degree certificates and exam results:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/imperial_docs.zip
and whilst I'm here I'll provide that link to posts I wrote on the
comp.dsp newsgroup about OFDM round the time when I did my MSc, which
you claim to be discussing GCSE level subjects, when in reality I was
discussing advanced course MSc level work.
I have nothing to hide, whereas YOU NEVER PROVIDE A SHRED OF EVIDENCE
TO BACK UP ANY CLAIM YOU MAKE.
You are a liar, Jamie. I therefore suggest that you apply for a job at
the BBC after failing your degree.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post anything to
>suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've got the grades or
>not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and sensibly.
Err, sensibly isn't the word I'd use. Give it up now Jamie because any
respect people had for your arguments is rapidly draining away. Steve has
posted enough evidence to show his degrees are real and short of phoning up
the universities for confirmation theres nothing else that can be done to
prove it one way or the other.
You're rapidly becoming the other side of the coin Dabsworth its currently
inhabiting so perhaps we need to think a nickname up for you too. Anyone got
any ideas?
B2003
jamie powell
<bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:18:26 +0100
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post anything to
>>suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've got the grades or
>>not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and sensibly.
>
> Err, sensibly isn't the word I'd use. Give it up now Jamie because any
> respect people had for your arguments is rapidly draining away. Steve has
> posted enough evidence to show his degrees are real and short of phoning up
> the universities for confirmation theres nothing else that can be done to
> prove it one way or the other.
They say a succer is born every minute, so it's no surprise to find one or two
on usenet.
Steven is ruthlessly dishonest scum - he'll fool the succers - but he won't
fool anyone who's actually qualified in the subjects he quacks about.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
><bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:18:26 +0100
>> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>>I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post anything to
>>>suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've got the grades or
>>>not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and sensibly.
>>
>> Err, sensibly isn't the word I'd use. Give it up now Jamie because any
>> respect people had for your arguments is rapidly draining away. Steve has
>> posted enough evidence to show his degrees are real and short of phoning up
>> the universities for confirmation theres nothing else that can be done to
>> prove it one way or the other.
>
>They say a succer is born every minute, so it's no surprise to find one or two
>on usenet.
Its spelt "sucker" you halfwit. And congrats on proving my point about you and
Dabsworth being 2 sides of the same coin - if someone doesn't agree with you,
you end up insulting them. Nice.
B2003
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:18:26 +0100
> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post
>>anything to
>>suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've got the
>>grades or
>>not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and sensibly.
>
> Err, sensibly isn't the word I'd use. Give it up now Jamie because
> any
> respect people had for your arguments is rapidly draining away.
> Steve has
> posted enough evidence to show his degrees are real and short of
> phoning up
> the universities for confirmation theres nothing else that can be
> done to
> prove it one way or the other.
Well said.
> You're rapidly becoming the other side of the coin Dabsworth its
> currently
> inhabiting so perhaps we need to think a nickname up for you too.
> Anyone got
> any ideas?
How about Daffyd, the only gay in the alt.radio.digital village? In
real life Jamie will obviously look like and dress like Daffyd, and
his personality is incredibly like Daffyd's.
jamie powell
<bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9id8q$bk8$1...@aioe.org...
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:24:00 +0100
>>
>>two
>>on usenet.
>
> Its spelt "sucker" you halfwit. And congrats on proving my point about you
> and
> Dabsworth being 2 sides of the same coin - if someone doesn't agree with
> you,
> you end up insulting them. Nice.
zomg I spelt it wrong you are master of the internet!!!!!111
Fine, so you're a SUCKER then :p
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:pan.2009.09...@yoyo.ORG...
Ah, right.
Imperial's got its fair share of famous professors, because just out
of the small sub-department where I studied an ex lecturer was
Professor Gabor, who's got a few things named after him:
http://www.google.co.uk/webhp?hl=en&tab=iw#hl=en&q=gabor+function
I think he's credited with being "the father of wavelets" as well,
which you can think of as being similar to the DFT (discrete Fourier
transform) because they allow a signal to be decomposed into a set of
coefficients that multiply the different wavelet functions (Jamie'll
tell you all about wavelets, because he's a Software Engineering
student, so he's an expert in DSP, even though he's never studied DSP
and he doesn't even have the prerequisite maths required to understand
DSP), and they're used by some modern audio and video codecs,
including the BBC's Dirac video codec.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:18:26 +0100
>> "jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>>>I'd be much more inclined to believe you if I'd seen you post
>>>anything to
>>>suggest you had clue. It's nothing to me whether you've got the
>>>grades or
>>>not - I'm merely looking at this objectively and sensibly.
>>
>> Err, sensibly isn't the word I'd use. Give it up now Jamie because
>> any
>> respect people had for your arguments is rapidly draining away.
>> Steve has
>> posted enough evidence to show his degrees are real and short of
>> phoning up
>> the universities for confirmation theres nothing else that can be
>> done to
>> prove it one way or the other.
>
> They say a succer is born every minute, so it's no surprise to find
> one or two on usenet.
Oh, the irony of someone who can't spell sucker calling someone else a
sucker, you sucker.
> Steven is ruthlessly dishonest scum - he'll fool the succers - but
> he won't fool anyone who's actually qualified in the subjects he
> quacks about.
As you've never studied digital communications, so you're obviously
not qualified in it, could you explain to me how you know that what
I've written is wrong?
Should be an interesting answer.
jamie powell
> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
>> Duh... Im with Steve, me, duh yeah, datz right.
>
>
> Well said.
aww bless. Steve's made friends with a vegetable.
> How about Daffyd, the only gay in the alt.radio.digital village? In real
> life Jamie will obviously look like and dress like Daffyd, and his
> personality is incredibly like Daffyd's.
*me*, like *Daffyd*? Oh steven, how deliciously absurd.
I dress androgyne fwiw - it keeps people guessing.
I'm also nothing like him physically, nor in my personality.
jamie powell
>
> As you've never studied digital communications, so you're obviously not
> qualified in it, could you explain to me how you know that what I've written
> is wrong?
>
> Should be an interesting answer.
You can fuck off if you think I'm going to waste my time trawling through all
of your archived usenet shit to discredit it, in addition to discrediting your
current excretions.
I wouldn't trust anything you write, because I already know you're a fraud.
That's all you need to know.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
"jamie powell" <jami...@excite.com> wrote:
>"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
>news:7i3utiF...@mid.individual.net...
>> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
>
>
>>> Duh... Im with Steve, me, duh yeah, datz right.
>>
>>
>> Well said.
>
>aww bless. Steve's made friends with a vegetable.
Put a sock in it Gaymie. Or should that be a carrot?
>it keeps people guessing.
Somehow I doubt that. Facial hair, no tits and a bulge in the trousers rather
give the game away in case you're not sure of the differences between
men and women.
B2003
jamie powell
>
> Imperial's got its fair share of famous professors, because just out of the
> small sub-department where I studied an ex lecturer was Professor Gabor,
> who's got a few things named after him:
>
> http://www.google.co.uk/webhp?hl=en&tab=iw#hl=en&q=gabor+function
>
> I think he's credited with being "the father of wavelets" as well, which you
> can think of as being similar to the DFT (discrete Fourier transform)
> because they allow a signal to be decomposed into a set of coefficients that
> multiply the different wavelet functions (Jamie'll tell you all about
> wavelets, because he's a Software Engineering student, so he's an expert in
> DSP, even though he's never studied DSP and he doesn't even have the
> prerequisite maths required to understand DSP), and they're used by some
> modern audio and video codecs, including the BBC's Dirac video codec.
Aww bless.
Wannabee steven's been googling a professor at the uni he was never smart
enough to go to, and he thinks this qualifies him to take another cheap shot
at me. You sad, sad case.
jamie powell
<bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9ike2$kvs$1...@aioe.org...
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:24:51 +0100
>
>
> Somehow I doubt that. Facial hair, no tits and a bulge in the trousers
> rather
> give the game away in case you're not sure of the differences between
> men and women.
I'm quite androgynous.
Older people frequently call me 'miss' or 'young lady' fwiw.
bolta...@yahoo.co.uk
Well whatever you are, gay , TS, TV , straight, sheep shagger, that doesn't
change the fact that you're definately a twat.
B2003
jamie powell
<bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h9il41$luc$1...@aioe.org...
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:39:07 +0100
>
> change the fact that you're definately a twat.
I'm not surprised to find you're taken in by Steven - and it's nothing to be
ashamed of.
The fraudsters' techniques work on a great many people - and not just the
stupidest ones.
Literally anyone who is capable of "having faith" in anything is constantly at
risk.
ste...@totalise.co.uk
Jamie, you COULD NOT DISCREDIT anything I've written about digital
communications because you've NEVER STUDIED IT.
Is that simple enough for you to understand?
For the record, anybody who'd like to see what Jamie is on about, with
respect to posts by me about digital communications, please see:
I have nothing to hide, whereas I can't ever remember Jamie providing
a single reference to back up anything he says.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@fooked.com> wrote in message
> news:7i3utiF...@mid.individual.net...
>> <bolta...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:h9i0p7$qgm$1...@aioe.org...
>
>
>>> Duh... Im with Steve, me, duh yeah, datz right.
>>
>>
>> Well said.
>
> aww bless. Steve's made friends with a vegetable.
>
>
>> How about Daffyd, the only gay in the alt.radio.digital village? In
>> real life Jamie will obviously look like and dress like Daffyd, and
>> his personality is incredibly like Daffyd's.
>
> *me*, like *Daffyd*?
Yes, absolutely.
> Oh steven, how deliciously absurd.
> I dress androgyne fwiw - it keeps people guessing.
> I'm also nothing like him physically, nor in my personality.
You certainly come over as being very Daffyd-like on here.
jamie powell
<ste...@totalise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:d220a617-0a31-49b5...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jamie, you COULD NOT DISCREDIT anything I've written about digital
> communications because you've NEVER STUDIED IT.
>
> Is that simple enough for you to understand?
I don't claim to have studied it, and that's not the issue here.
As I've said many times, unlike you, I don't pretend to be something I'm not.
The issue here is an odd man calling himself Steve, posting long-winded rants
on usenet, and getting really simplistic things wrong.
If this man then makes lofty claims about himself, I immediately smell a rat.
It really is as simple as that.
> I have nothing to hide, whereas I can't ever remember Jamie providing
> a single reference to back up anything he says.
You have a lot to hide - that's why you had to go to the trouble of forging
results papers, and desperately trying to describe a route which you'd never
taken by way of Google maps.
Silk
> Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, the
> question that a gay person should surely ask when a homophobe says
> that homosexuality is "fundamentally wrong" is "why do you think it is
> fundamentally wrong?", not "oh, that's okay, Silk, queer bashers are
> okay in my book so long as they don't like Steven".
Who said anything about queer bashing, you moron? I know this may be an
alien concept for you, but it is possible to disagree with someone
without feeling the need to use force to put over your own point of
view. It's called tollerance.
Perhaps you think it's a good idea to beat up Jews because they don't
believe in Jesus. Or even people who listen to DAB because it's convenient.
Again, it shows that you have absolutely no idea about real people and
the real world.
Silk
> Oh, the irony of claiming that you've won an argument when all you can
> say in response to me providing pictures of my degree certificates and
> high exam results is that I faked them.
The irony is, I believe they're genuine and that makes it worse.
Having an education and wasting it is nothing short of criminal.
DAB sounds worse than FM
>
> <ste...@totalise.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:d220a617-0a31-49b5...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Jamie, you COULD NOT DISCREDIT anything I've written about digital
>> communications because you've NEVER STUDIED IT.
>>
>> Is that simple enough for you to understand?
>
> I don't claim to have studied it, and that's not the issue here.
The issue here is that you said this:
"You can fuck off if you think I'm going to waste my time trawling
through all
of your archived usenet shit to discredit it, in addition to
discrediting your
current excretions."
and I'm stating that you COULD NOT DISCREDIT IT because you haven't
studied the subject, and therefore you don't even know if it's right
or wrong anyway.
>> I have nothing to hide, whereas I can't ever remember Jamie
>> providing
>> a single reference to back up anything he says.
>
> You have a lot to hide - that's why you had to go to the trouble of
> forging results papers, and desperately trying to describe a route
> which you'd never taken by way of Google maps.
I'm happy to let other people decide for themselves whether my results
and degree certificates are "faked" or not:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/degree_results_(far_higher_than_Jamies).zip
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/documents/imperial_docs.zip
and whether I know what I'm talking about regarding digital
communications:
All you want to do is claim that I don't have any degrees and I'm
thick and I don't know about digital communicatinos without any
evidence to back up what you're saying whatsoever.
Silk
As the actress said to the bishop, it was fun while it lasted. I'd
rather we stuck to the subject really and challenged Dabsworth in the
areas he needs challenging.
I do believe he has the qualifications he says he has and has a good
knowledge of digital radio theory. Where he's lacking is in his
knowledge of business and dealing with and understanding of people in
general, as evidenced by his rants on here.
DAB sounds worse than FM
news:h9il41$luc$1...@aioe.org...
Couldn't agree more, and I reckon most people on here and on
uk.tech.digital-tv (where apparently he acts in exactly the same way
as on here) would also agree.
DAB sounds worse than FM
Wrong on all counts. Nothing new there then...
jamie powell
"Giuseppe" <giuse...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7e20a221-1ebc-4390...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On 24 Set, 23:42, "jamie powell" <jamie_...@excite.com> wrote:
>> > I will admit that I believe homosexuality to be fundamentally wrong.
>>
>> pfft. okay, but do you at least accept that:
>> 1) homosexuality *isn't* a choice
>> 2) homosexuality does no harm to others
>
> He might be strictly monosexual:
> http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/09/27/the-homosexual-is-140-and-showing-his-age/
ugh... yet more proof that the web is full of shit.
jamie powell
> On 29 Set, 19:43, "jamie powell" <jamie_...@excite.com> wrote:
>
>> > He might be strictly monosexual:
>>
>> ugh... yet more proof that the web is full of shit.
>
> article?
Care to just fuck off? This newsgroup already has one resident quack.