Jatt Da Genie Movie Download REPACK

[Nancie Fazzari]

<div>I agree with point number 1 totally! Jatts are still pujari of their ancestors and clan elders, hence why "jatt sikh" can never exist. Please refer to the amrit sanchar set by shiri guru gobind singh, it states that ones previous ancestors is denounced and the guru and khalsa ancestory is accepted? Hence why again, their can me no "jatt sikh", just sikh and khalsa.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>jatt da genie movie download</div><div></div><div>Download Zip: https://t.co/cSWJYrMewS </div><div></div><div></div><div>Get back to me when you go back to the drawing board and find some other bogus claim of your jatt supremacy. If in doubt or at a loss, refer back to one of the pindu jatt supreme personalities like jazzy b or mr Diljit dosanjh who support badal and modi! Great!?</div><div></div><div></div><div>by jassa singh ramgharia misl after they capture ramghar fort. Each misl had a so called understanding of sikh people understand that they descend from his misl. However ramgharia is used to describe people who were tarkhan - carpenters. Ramgharia means fort of ram (god). We have to go to the misl history. Then the migration to east africa majority tarkhans who called the gurdwaras ramgharia they migrated to europe and america taking the misl tradition. Generally some still hold onto the old tradition. some do prayer to baba vishkarma avtar of brahma to protect tools. proper singhs who claim descent from ramgharia misl will do ardas. So it is a means of respect of the decent. We need to look into the history of the misls how they were different and the same. Ramgharia bunga was made in harmandar sahib. However we have instances of misls intermarrying so gursikhs did marry. Some claim the misl was started by a sardar from jatt decent. Mahraja jassa singh altough descendent from carpenters was a gursikh and his ancestors made weapons for guru gobind singh ji. So the misl history itself is the start.</div><div></div><div></div><div>In Sikh Panth we have seen the domination of Jatt Sikhs, and in my reading of history and talking to some people of the non-jatt castes, I have come to observe that as Jatts beleive that they are the true Sikhs (which is laughable) and the other caste Sikhs are worthless, some castes have latched onto a contribution made by a fellow caste-member of yesteryear and created an awareness around it, symbolising their importance and contribution to the panth.</div><div></div><div></div><div>The tarkhans mainly, and other caste groups not wishin gto be dominated by thick jatts, just made their own gurdwaras, and called it Ramgarhia, which they mistakenly think their caste is. Ramgarhia misl had all castes in it, as did every misl.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Not all langar are cooked outside one thing to note is those gurdwaras were made in older times before central heating was made famous in colder climates when it really snowed and people got arthritis, other issues in which they couldn't sit on the floor. Even other so to say jatt gurdwara had tables and chairs. It was SGPC themselves who after seeing declared the rehat. With langar being brought in from outside is to do even with issues inside like kitchnes. Sometimes for weddings for ease of giving such they cater them even with timing issues. We have foil and other means to keep food warm for transportation so it is not a huge problem. The only issue might be utensil used but these are also used by what we call those who eat meat. There is generally a distance in kitchen to langar hall if they are not the same so have to be transported. It is all to do with the heat why people keep shoes on. The whole point of langar was equality, so even having people sat equally is as such. These days people sit on the floor in circles distancing from each other. In some gurdwaras we find people shouting at people, or not giving right portions. In some jatt majority gurdwaras they ask someones caste and family name, kicking out people of other castes this is a violation of rehat itself.</div><div></div><div></div><div>We had problems with some gurdwaras who had wedding halls attached under gurdwara property and name that served meat and alcohol as ragharia gurdwara the satkar commitee banned it. Remember from each ancestory we have had great gursikhs in the past and do today and will have in the future. We are all one big family guru gobind singh established one amrit for all we are a family have intermarried in many cases. Loads of jatts, ramgharia, bhappa, lohar, brahmin, khatri, arora, chumar, ravidassi are all inter-related we have inter married already many times. To cause problems amongst each other is to cause problems between our own families.</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Well instead of blaming the tarkhans many of them said the jatts kept them out of marrying into there family posed them as inferior to them and didn't let them sit on comities. However biologically related to them and many have for generations only bred into there own and kept away from living we have brahmin mat going on in our people for some time.</div><div></div><div></div><div>From even Maharaja Ranjit singh like when we read about him the guy was illiterate I think he was compromised by brahmins putting these beliefs into sikhi and changing things around. I think Maharaja Ranjit Singh took favour more of brahmins over gianis, the gianis knew not to believe in caste but we learn they were also illiterate in several languages from trump. I think we had this problem from Maharaja Ranjit Singh's time as there was infighting then. But jatts and tarkhans have intermarried still do and some are proud to be Sikh first.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Because tarkhans were denied sewa in guru ghars by jatts they went made there own and only sat there own people so the jatts or anyone else wouldn't do this. If anything this caste system mainly has been put into the sikhs mainly by jatts. When other people oppose it we find several jatts saying they are chumar or choora or less then them and they then go make there own gurdwaras and don't marry into them.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Again we find exceptions to it and some don't think like that but we have some who push this view more. And there are tarkhans who are therefore hostile to jatts and other castes. Even in some cases when jatts allow other people into positions of power, responsibility or leadership they are downgraded in several places forgetting the guys own merit.</div><div></div><div></div><div>Also today many have taken this view that Sikhi instead of destroying the caste system only taught tolerance and created diversity as we still find in gurbani various statements of castes in several instances just like the argument we find the names of Hindu gods and goddess so Sikhism allows polytheism this was taken forth by Sikhs who made aryan samaj. Singh Sabha movement now from it's jatt majority has messed about with the rehat that people had to make other jathas mainly like the darzis (tailors) who went into akj and so forth due to this infighting.</div><div></div><div></div><div>I think people have been unaware of Sukha Singh for some time... from other writings even from the nirmalas we have issues in writings we haven't translated suraj prakash yet. I think other castes didn't care much for Jassa Singh Ramgharia people twist things about. These days people who were not jatt have been called jatt we learn maharaja ranjit singh originally was a rajput however lablled a jatt and dogra rajas were labelled rajputs hence traitors. We find people pointing out the minas and massand were khatris forgetting the origins of the gurus hence more downgrading. We then have slandering to khatris as bhappa. The khatris around those regions were some of the most highly educated in Sikhi but put down. As for problems towards jatts was backwards hostility.</div><div></div><div> df19127ead</div>