"We would gladly burn a hundred," boasted an unapologetic Conrad,"if just
one among them were guilty."
***
"Conrad sought victims among the gentry as well as among the common folk,
perhaps because of his zeal in the pursuit of heresy or perhaps because the
wealth of a convicted heretic was subject to confiscation. In 1233 his eye
fell upon Count Henry II of Seyn, a wealthy nobleman who had demonstrated
his own Christian piety by endowing churches and monasteries and even going
on crusade. Conrad produced a witness who claimed to have seen Henry riding
on a monstrous crab on his way to a sex orgy. But Henry, unlike Conrad's
humbler victims, was not cowed into confession. Rather, the count insisted
on confronting the inquisitor and putting him to his proof."
--Jonathan Kirsch, The Grand Inquisitor's Manual: A History of Terror in
the Name of God (2008). Harper-One, pp. 58-59
[The count was acquitted by a "blue-ribbon" tribunal after Conrad's
witnesses revealed that they had given evidence only to spare themselves
from the stake. Conrad hurriedly left Mainz, but not quickly enough -- he
was tracked down by a hit squad ordered to put an end to Conrad and his
crew, and slain five days after the acquittal. This was a rare case of an
acquittal in an inquisitorial proceeding and a rarer case of an inquisitor
being meted justice by or on behalf of someone at one point within the
inquisitor's grasp. -- SKR]
--
__________
All outgoing original e-mail scanned for virus content by McAfee
VirusScan. -- SKR