Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

WHY THE HECK SHOULD I FIRST QUOTE THE MESSAGE I AM REPLYING TO???

0 views
Skip to first unread message

MI6 U2

unread,
Nov 19, 2003, 10:16:20 AM11/19/03
to
In proper writing form the practice in USENET (that it accepts for the most
part statisticly by notice) and email groups is not used in real life (as it
is bad form for the most part, as quotes are referenced in correlation to
something the author would say, placed in bibliographies footnotes or what
ever).

Why should I expound on the ideas of what others say first?
Is there some rule that says I should mention what others say first?
Why should I read 1, 2, 3 to 10 pages of quotes to get to what some author
says?

It seems a character flaw/defect where an author seeks validation or
foundation and thru mention of what someone else says (as if they have
nothing to say on their own [just as wrong as if it were all revolving
around the author])......

Please compare these techniques to the writers of scam spam and other great
ficional works.

Dr Zen

unread,
Nov 20, 2003, 11:14:55 AM11/20/03
to
"MI6 U2" <for-my-e...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<8PLub.49283$bQ3....@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>...

Why not just post what you want and be damned?

Zen

Seven Nation Amy

unread,
Nov 20, 2003, 12:25:42 PM11/20/03
to
gol...@hotmail.com (Dr Zen) wrote in
news:5e7da04d.03112...@posting.google.com:

Perhaps he has a soul.

Dr Zen

unread,
Nov 21, 2003, 6:56:00 AM11/21/03
to
Seven Nation Amy <seven_na...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<Xns9439B1392B6C3brokenwing@such-a-shame>...

You remember when they said at school "if you've got nothing good to
say, don't say anything"? No? Well, you should have turned up that
day.

Zen

Seven Nation Amy

unread,
Nov 21, 2003, 9:44:38 AM11/21/03
to

Which is why I have a certain respect for Palmer. He too failed to be
raped of personality, care of the education system.

Besides... a veteran Usenetter once said to me "You can be sure your post
wasn't completely worthless merely by fact of reply". I go with that,
mainly for purposes of convenience, but what the fuck? It's my show,
right?

AZ A1

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:42:11 AM12/12/03
to
Thanks but I am against arbitrary quotes notice how I quote yours in the
relevant part not totality??

"Dr Zen" <gol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5e7da04d.03112...@posting.google.com...


> "MI6 U2" <for-my-e...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<8PLub.49283$bQ3....@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>...

> Why not just post what you want and be damned?
>
> Zen

MI6 U2

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:42:15 AM12/12/03
to
"Dr Zen" <gol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5e7da04d.03112...@posting.google.com...

MI6 U2

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:42:14 AM12/12/03
to
Again notice how I edit and quote the relevant parts?? not everything!!

"Seven Nation Amy" <seven_na...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9439B1392B6C3brokenwing@such-a-shame...
> gol...@hotmail.com

MI6 U2

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:42:15 AM12/12/03
to
"Seven Nation Amy" <seven_na...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns943A95EE3298Cbrokenwing@such-a-shame...
> gol...@hotmail.com

> Which is why I have a certain respect for Palmer. He too failed to be
> raped of personality

Or so you say just like any fool

> Besides... a veteran Usenetter once said to me "You can be sure your post
> wasn't completely worthless merely by fact of reply". I go with that,

you have to be kidding on the fifteen minutes of fame meter you don't even
register

> mainly for purposes of convenience, but what the fuck? It's my show,

a little full of ourselves aren't you?

> right?


MI6 U2

unread,
Dec 12, 2003, 4:42:15 AM12/12/03
to
SO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION

WHY THE HECK SHOULD I FIRST QUOTE THE MESSAGE I AM REPLYING TO???

BECAUSE MOST OF THOSE RESPONSES WERE DEFUNTIONAL NON-RESPONSES!!


0 new messages