On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:00:19 -0600, "Rod's SHAW"
<
rod....@removethis.shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>"Mike" <
m...@ike.com> wrote in message news:u09rp8d4nm098te34...@4ax.com...
>| On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:43:30 -0600, "Rod's SHAW"
>| <
rod....@removethis.shaw.ca> wrote:
>|
>| >
>| >pffft ... Albert did it all sans Boolean logic and the help of computers.
>|
>| And I have absolutely no hesitation in claiming I know far more about
>| Computers than Einstein could have dreamed possible in his day!
>
>pffft ... there were no computers for Albert to know anything about.
>
>But goody for and Kudos to you for knowing more about computers than Einstein.
>
>And surely you realize that you possess no where close to the genius mind which Albert did.
You obviously don't know much about Einstein's personal life and
history. Einstein got poor marks at school and was once a mathematical
failure. People come up with all sorts of excuses to defend it, but a
failure is a failure. It was fortune that made him famous, not his
genius.
I got 95% in all my High School Math and Physics got a straight GPA of
4.0 in first year Calculus, which is impossible to beat. It's the
highest mark possible. I have my transcripts to prove it to myself and
have no desire to prove anything to you anyhow.
If you were Einstein or similar, maybe that woudl be as start to this
debate. But as it stands now you are like a cat or dog, or any other
animal for that matter. You are unable to process abstract or complex
information and worse again you are unable to see your personal
limitations in understand, where I can see them clearly.