PROOF SOLLOG IS A TRUE SEER
TruthSeeker
trully amazed. He hit a bunch of quake warnings in the last couple of years
and I think that's proof he is the Word of God. If he isn't, then his
prophecies wouldn't be validated as they are so often.
If you really want proof that Sollog is a real prophet then just research
his past earth quake predictions. You will most likely come to the same
conclusion that I have.
Here is a link to articles that explain all his famous quake predictions:
http://www.sollog.com/Quakes00.shtml
(IMPORTANT NOTE: Some articles from the above link can't be viewed with
Internet Explorer so you might need to use Netscape to view them)
Here is a link to a website that keeps record of all significant earthquakes
around the world. You can use it to verify that the quakes did occur and it
gives you the date, the magnitude, location and other useful statistics:
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/significant.html
Here are the links to some of his quake warnings. These warnings were time
stamped on google so that is proof that they are authentic:
New Years Quake
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+quake+warning+72+jerusalem&start=30&hl=en&scoring=d&selm=3A4BAFD8.4060206%40nospam.com&rnum=32
Seven years Quakes
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+quake+new+years+terrorism&hl=en&selm=9dca61bc.0112231145.2dbd231d%40posting.google.com&rnum=1
Here's a link to another person's analysis of Sollog's quake predictions:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+earthquake+faq&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=9dca61bc.0203081248.5271e6b1%40posting.google.com&rnum=1
Now it is necessary to thoroughly investigate all of the above links and you
should certainly come to same conclusion I have. Sollog is the Word of God.
Oh, I did witness some interesting quakes myself. When Sollog warned that
New York and Los Angelos were about to be struck by great quakes, the next
day the largest quake in a couple of years hit southern California. Also, he
sent a warning that the NY/LA quakes were imminent and a couple of days
later, the largest quake in 20 years hit New York. Amazing!! So I suggest
you all really look into all of these quake warnings. They are proof that
what Sollog says is true. Nukes are near.
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>I've been looking into all of Sollog's past quake warnings and I've been
>trully amazed. He hit a bunch of quake warnings in the last couple of years
>and I think that's proof he is the Word of God.
Then YOU are a moron.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>I've been looking into all of Sollog's video on line.
The 2 meg version with the laff track is a hoot.
(don't bother downloading the 17 meg version. It's not as funny)
Other than that, Sollog is a fraud and a nitwit.
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
Leigh_Bee
> I've been looking into all of Sollog's past quake warnings and I've been
> trully amazed. He hit a bunch of quake warnings in the last couple of years
> and I think that's proof he is the Word of God. If he isn't, then his
> prophecies wouldn't be validated as they are so often.
>
> If you really want proof that Sollog is a real prophet then just research
> his past earth quake predictions. You will most likely come to the same
> conclusion that I have.
They are proof that what Sollog says is true. Nukes are near.
Truthseeker he calls himself and we get a post like the above.
Sollog was a fraud and his sycophants must be lonely, I notice it was
Jim Jones "Day" today sound familiar?
LB
gato2002
be death.
Leigh_Bee escribió:
Krib
"Der Coach" <DerC...@FanaticLegionsHQ.Mil> wrote in message
> "I have high arches, your honor, and the last time I was in
> jail, my shoes were killing me." -- John Patrick Ennis (Sollog)
LOL great quote.
--
krib
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
news:wUeub.173$aw2.1...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
> prophecies wouldn't be validated as they are so often.
If he was then he could never be wrong could he? what was that crap
he spewed about the pope? the recent sniper? everything he spouts?
> They are proof that what Sollog says is true. Nukes are near.
Yet you and the other sheep still live, work, school as usual, strange
if you believe any of it, why is that?
--
krib
Cardinal Chunder
> I've been looking into all of Sollog's past quake warnings and I've been
> trully amazed.
Yeah, because you're a dribbling sock puppet incapable of seeing the
awful and laughably bad predictions for what they are.
How come the pope isn't dead?
Ex.
"Cardinal Chunder" <c...@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:bpe2q...@enews3.newsguy.com...
You didn't read his prediction very closely did you? See! See!! This is the
problem with all of the disbelievers who will be destroyed ....
It's a *SPIRITUAL* death ... not physical ... see now??? Huh??
Oh well, it was worth a try ... : )
/ex
Leigh_Bee
I find it extremely amusing to see some folk hold with a conviction,
that people like Sollog, a misanthrope of the first order has
sycophants who have nothing better to do, than trumpet a dead failure
as being something he clearly was not. Maybe Wes Craven will make a
nice demented movie on him.
Criswell was far more amusing.
LB
TruthSeeker
"Never anonymous Bud" <the...@san.rxyzr.com> wrote in message
news:2hejrvk7n64u7ntfe...@4ax.com...
> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>
> >I've been looking into all of Sollog's past quake warnings and I've been
> >trully amazed. He hit a bunch of quake warnings in the last couple of
years
> >and I think that's proof he is the Word of God.
>
>
> Then YOU are a moron.
>
Wow, you really showed me. Not!! You're such an idiot. Calling me names
without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
How about this challenge. Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
quake:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en&scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
Here's the quake database. It's a list of quakes for the year 2000. Check
to see if the quake actually existed:
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned. In fact, it was
the only significant quake in all of April 2000! It occured on the same
line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
Estero is an anagram for Easter!! It's an obvious hit to see, if you're
brain is not clogged up.
Prove what I say above is false!! You can't do it because it's absolutely
true. Sollog predicted that quake. And it's just one of many quake
predictions. Now shut your mouth you monkey!!!!
TruthSeeker
"Wally AngleseaT" <wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
message news:5qejrvscs8o4uknkc...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:49:16 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
> wrote:
>
> >I've been looking into all of Sollog's video on line.
> The 2 meg version with the laff track is a hoot.
> (don't bother downloading the 17 meg version. It's not as funny)
>
> Other than that, Sollog is a fraud and a nitwit.
>
You're the obvious nitwit for not even looking into the links that I
presented. Because if you had visited the links, you wouldn't be attacking
Sollog. You would understand who Sollog really is. You would know the he
has a true gift. But instead you choose to ignore my original post and
verbally attack Sollog. What a fool...
TruthSeeker
"Der Coach" <DerC...@FanaticLegionsHQ.Mil> wrote in message
> Wally AngleseaT wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:49:16 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >I've been looking into all of Sollog's video on line.
> > The 2 meg version with the laff track is a hoot.
> > (don't bother downloading the 17 meg version. It's not as funny)
> >
> > Other than that, Sollog is a fraud and a nitwit.
> >
>
> populated with posers and wannabes that are living off of SoiledLogs drug
> and porn money.
>
Sollog's not dead you idiot. I don't know why all you morons keep saying
that he's dead. He's alive and well and his most recently released
prophecies are proof he is still alive. That article someone posted to this
newsgroup that said Sollog was dead was a complete lie.
TruthSeeker
"Leigh_Bee" <leig...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:39cd5fe.03111...@posting.google.com...
> Truthseeker he calls himself and we get a post like the above.
> Sollog was a fraud and his sycophants must be lonely, I notice it was
> Jim Jones "Day" today sound familiar?
> LB
You should refrain from replying to my posts unless you have something
intelligent to say. Prove that the quakes I listed weren't predicted by
Sollog. You can't do it. All you can do is post lies with no evidence.
TruthSeeker
"gato2002" <SINESTO...@vtr.net> wrote in message
news:bpdgc0$1mn8vq$1...@ID-157603.news.uni-berlin.de...
> SlopyDog say earlier that the nukes will explode in 1999, the pope will
> be death.
>
Actually Sollog would never say such a thing because he always uses CORRECT
ENGLISH, you idiot. Before you rush to judgement about Sollog, how about
you read the damn links that I posted. It's proof that Sollog has the gift
of prophecy. The very first quake prediction that is listed should make you
a believer. All you have to do is read it. It will only take a few minutes
to look at the first quake warning, the quake database and the article
explaining the quake warning. Just freakin' read!!
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>
>"Der Coach" <DerC...@FanaticLegionsHQ.Mil> wrote in message
>news:ZGVyY29hY2g=.f6350cd05dbc9ae6cb7ed319ea294f20@1069165524.cotse.net...
>> Wally AngleseaT wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:49:16 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >I've been looking into all of Sollog's video on line.
>> > The 2 meg version with the laff track is a hoot.
>> > (don't bother downloading the 17 meg version. It's not as funny)
>> >
>> > Other than that, Sollog is a fraud and a nitwit.
>> >
>>
>> Not only is $ollog a fraud, but he's dead as well. Usenet is now only
>> populated with posers and wannabes that are living off of SoiledLogs drug
>> and porn money.
>>
>
>Sollog's not dead you idiot. I don't know why all you morons keep saying
>that he's dead. He's alive and well and his most recently released
>prophecies are proof he is still alive.
No he's not. He died of alcoholic poisoning. That brass polish he was
drinking will do it every time.
--
Lt. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>
>"Wally AngleseaT" <wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
>message news:5qejrvscs8o4uknkc...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:49:16 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I've been looking into all of Sollog's video on line.
>> The 2 meg version with the laff track is a hoot.
>> (don't bother downloading the 17 meg version. It's not as funny)
>>
>> Other than that, Sollog is a fraud and a nitwit.
>>
>
>You're the obvious nitwit for not even looking into the links that I
>presented.
I did. I just used a safe browser.
> Because if you had visited the links, you wouldn't be attacking
>Sollog.
Oh yes I would JP Ennis (you) are a kook and a fraud. The Pope is
still alive, by the way. Fucked up bigtime on that, didn't you?
> You would understand who Sollog really is.
We do know. JP Ennis. A convicted drunk driver.
> You would know the he
>has a true gift. But instead you choose to ignore my original post and
>verbally attack Sollog. What a fool...
JP Ennis is a fraud, but the video is a hoot. Especially the 2 meg
version with the laff track and the new subtitles.
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
auk added
That's right. You cannot prove a negative.
JP postdicts and fits things to suit *after* the events.
Whenever he tries to *predict* he fails. Like with the Pope.
The video is funny though. Especially the 2 meg version with the laff
track and the new subtitles. You can get it on Kazaa.
TruthSeeker
"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:xqtub.2488$MP5....@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
>
> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> news:wUeub.173$aw2.1...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
> > and I think that's proof he is the Word of God. If he isn't, then his
> > prophecies wouldn't be validated as they are so often.
>
> If he was then he could never be wrong could he? what was that crap
> he spewed about the pope? the recent sniper? everything he spouts?
>
What crap about the pope?? The pope hasn't even died yet so you can't say
any of his predictions about the popes death have failed. Once the pope
dies, you will see how it aligns to one of Sollog's prophecies.
His sniper profile was actually pretty accurate.
> > They are proof that what Sollog says is true. Nukes are near.
>
> Yet you and the other sheep still live, work, school as usual, strange
> if you believe any of it, why is that?
You don't know anything about my situation so don't make stupid assumptions!
You're the biggest jerk out there Krib. The majority of your posts are
verbal attacks. Go back to playing with your balls you nuisance!
Here, I'll offer you the same challenge:
*************
TruthSeeker
"Cardinal Chunder" <c...@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:bpe2q...@enews3.newsguy.com...
Why are you morons still complaining about the pope not being dead? Did
Sollog give an exact specific, date that the pope would die? NO. Did
Sollog ever say anything like "the pope will die on August 4, 2002?" NO.
So stop bitching about the pope!
Look at the quake predictions I posted and don't rush to judgement.
TruthSeeker
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:08:20 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
> wrote:
> auk added
> >
> >"Leigh_Bee" <leig...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> >news:39cd5fe.03111...@posting.google.com...
> >> Truthseeker he calls himself and we get a post like the above.
> >> Sollog was a fraud and his sycophants must be lonely, I notice it was
> >> Jim Jones "Day" today sound familiar?
> >> LB
> >
> >You should refrain from replying to my posts unless you have something
> >intelligent to say. Prove that the quakes I listed weren't predicted by
> >Sollog. You can't do it.
>
>
> That's right. You cannot prove a negative.
>
> JP postdicts and fits things to suit *after* the events.
>
> Whenever he tries to *predict* he fails. Like with the Pope.
>
Your posts just prove how stupid you really are. You haven't addressed any
of the facts that I presented. I'm giving you a fucking challenge and you
can't step up.
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>
>"Never anonymous Bud" <the...@san.rxyzr.com> wrote in message
>news:2hejrvk7n64u7ntfe...@4ax.com...
>> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
>> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>>
>> >I've been looking into all of Sollog's past quake warnings and I've been
>> >trully amazed. He hit a bunch of quake warnings in the last couple of
>years
>> >and I think that's proof he is the Word of God.
>>
>>
>> Then YOU are a moron.
>>
>
>Wow, you really showed me. Not!! You're such an idiot. Calling me names
>without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
>
>How about this challenge. Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
>quake:
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en&scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
>
>Here's the quake database. It's a list of quakes for the year 2000. Check
>to see if the quake actually existed:
>http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
there were 158 magnitude 6 quakes in 2000. One every 2 days. Show us
something interesting.
Not only that Boiled dog said it would strike within 100 Miles of
Easter Island. The mag 6 Quake on April 23rd was in Argentina. When
did Easter Island move to the Argentinean coast? Note Boiled dog said
"Easter Day", so he could have taken the Friday, Sunday or Monday.
MISSED. Just like he MISSED the Pope.
>
>If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
>magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned. In fact, it was
>the only significant quake in all of April 2000! It occured on the same
>line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
>Estero is an anagram for Easter!!
Mental acrobatics noted.
> It's an obvious hit to see, if you're
>brain is not clogged up.
More likely if you have *no* brain.
>
>Prove what I say above is false!! You can't do it because it's absolutely
>true. Sollog predicted that quake. And it's just one of many quake
>predictions. Now shut your mouth you monkey!!!!
>
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>
>"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
>news:xqtub.2488$MP5....@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
>>
>> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
>> news:wUeub.173$aw2.1...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
>> > and I think that's proof he is the Word of God. If he isn't, then his
>> > prophecies wouldn't be validated as they are so often.
>>
>> If he was then he could never be wrong could he? what was that crap
>> he spewed about the pope? the recent sniper? everything he spouts?
>>
>
>What crap about the pope?? The pope hasn't even died yet so you can't say
>any of his predictions about the popes death have failed. Once the pope
>dies, you will see how it aligns to one of Sollog's prophecies.
What you mean to say was "When the POpe Dies, I, JP Ennis will
manipulate data to make it look like I go a hit, and hope that
everyone will forget that I'm a freaking nutcase"
<Snip o' kookrant>
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
One of your suck poppets posted this, nitwit, or did you forget?
>Posted: 24 Sep 2003 08:33 pm Post subject: POPE TO DIE OCTOBER 8th
>2003 - 100803 (183) 13th day of MOON
>Can it be the DAY OF DEATH has come for John Paul II aka POPE OF THE
>CATHOLIC CHURCH aka POPE OF SATAN
>
>Sollog's 902 Prophecy pointed to the 13th Day of the New Moon in
>October and the IDES OF AUGUSTUS
>
>That's the 8th of October this year 2003
>
>10 - 08 - 03
>
>Since 1995 Sollog has said THE DAY OF THE DEATH OF THE POPE WILL BE 1
>8 3
>
>10 - 08 - 03
>
>1 - 8 - 3
>
>Ides of Augustus
>
>13th day 8th Month
>
>October is based on Octavius Augustus
>
>Octo is EIGHT in Latin
>
>13th is the ides of the MOON the 15th day can also be an ides since in
>Rome the 13th and 15th are both ides
>
>So 8th Day 10th Month 03 the year
>
>08/10/03 in euro dating
>
>drop the zeros
>
>8 1 3
>
>8 - 13 or IDES OF AUGUSTUS
>
>Things are ALIGNED for a MAJOR HIT for Sollog when the old frail pope
>just happens to die on a clear date hit for Sollog's famous POPE
>PROPHECY
>
>Will it occur?
>
>Or did we change HIStory by pointing to it?
>
>Pass this WARNING around usenet
>
>Sollog's site is http://www.sollog.com
>
>Time Stamp with Sollog's Ides of Augustus Prophecy
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+08.08/2002+ides+augustus&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3d54ac74_1%40news.meganetnews.com&rnum=3
>
>The 902 Prophecy with time stamp
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3413381B.64AE%40whatshotin.com
>
>
>An interesting attempt to reveal the riddle
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=19971006010300.VAA22015%40ladder02.news.aol.com&rnum=42&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dsollog%2Bpope%2Bjohn%2Bpaul%2Bides%2Baugustus%2Bharvest%2Bmoon%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26scoring%3Dd%26start%3D50%26sa%3DN
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>
>"Wally AngleseaT" <wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
>message news:qsqorvsl023jrj3rq...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:08:20 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
>> wrote:
>> auk added
>> >
>> >"Leigh_Bee" <leig...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> >news:39cd5fe.03111...@posting.google.com...
>> >> Truthseeker he calls himself and we get a post like the above.
>> >> Sollog was a fraud and his sycophants must be lonely, I notice it was
>> >> Jim Jones "Day" today sound familiar?
>> >> LB
>> >
>> >You should refrain from replying to my posts unless you have something
>> >intelligent to say. Prove that the quakes I listed weren't predicted by
>> >Sollog. You can't do it.
>>
>>
>> That's right. You cannot prove a negative.
>>
>> JP postdicts and fits things to suit *after* the events.
>>
>> Whenever he tries to *predict* he fails. Like with the Pope.
>>
>
>Your posts just prove how stupid you really are. You haven't addressed any
>of the facts that I presented. I'm giving you a fucking challenge and you
>can't step up.
I already did, JP. Put down the brass polish for a moment, and read
the response. You missed. You've never successfully predicted a
quake. All you can do is postdict.
You can't get away from it, you suck at this.
And the Pope is alive. HTH, kook.
TruthSeeker
That proves my point. A fan of Sollog posted the above message to usenet
and it's an interpretation of Sollog's writings. Duh!! Sollog never wrote
that the pope would die on that date, a fan of Sollog did.
If someone were to incorrectly interpret one of Nostradamus' prophecies
would you then conclude that Nostradamus is a false prophet? No! It just
might be that the interpreter produced an incorrect interpretation. That is
true in this case.
So if you're concluding that Sollog is inaccurate based on the above, then
you really are a dummy.
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
No, YOU are definitely a moron if you buy ANY of the bullshit
that SlopDogs followers spew on a daily basis.
>How about this challenge. Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
>quake:
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en&scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
A) There was NO quake on Easter Sunday anywhere near Easter Island.
B) There has been NO quake anywhere close to 6.5 anywhere near
Easter Island in recoded history.
FILE CREATED: Thu Nov 20 00:46:11 2003
Geographic Grid Search Earthquakes= 1
Latitude: 27.000S - 28.000S
Longitude: 109.000W - 110.000W
Catalog Used: PDE
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE
PDE 1998 02 12 064840.93 -27.40 -109.88 10 5.10
So, a 5.1, in 1998, is the ONLY quake anywhere near Easter Island
in the USGS database.
Now, if you want to EXTEND the distance, you can claim a hit
on a quake WELL over 100 miles from Easter Island, In fact,
it was almost 3000 miles from the predicted location!
>If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
>magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned.
>It occured on the same
>line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
>Estero is an anagram for Easter!!
But the prediction was NOT for something almost 3000 miles from Easter Island,
it SPECIFICALLY SAID 'within 100 miles of Easter Island'.
So, not EVEN close, asshole.
>In fact, it was the only significant quake in all of April 2000!
That's NOT what the USGS database shows.
CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE
PDE 2000 04 03 152001.98 4.08 125.61 150 6.20
PDE 2000 04 07 190827.83 -18.05 65.52 10 6.30
PDE 2000 04 13 205414.09 10.30 126.52 33 6.00
PDE 2000 04 18 172812.39 -20.66 -176.47 220 6.00
PDE 2000 04 21 043517.69 51.42 -178.14 33 6.20
PDE 2000 04 23 092723.32 -28.31 -62.99 608 7.00
PDE 2000 04 23 170117.47 -28.38 -62.94 609 6.10 ..
>Prove what I say above is false!!
Done, easily.
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
Yes, he is.
> I don't know why all you morons keep saying that he's dead.
Because he IS dead, you cretin.
> He's alive and well and his most recently released prophecies are proof he is still alive.
His recent work is absolute proof that his ignorant slaves can't POSSIBLY
imitate his style, but will die trying.
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
<SNIP>
>> >Pass this WARNING around usenet
>
>That proves my point. A fan of Sollog posted the above message to usenet
>and it's an interpretation of Sollog's writings. Duh!! Sollog never wrote
>that the pope would die on that date, a fan of Sollog did.
Oh, give us a break, JP. Sollog has no fans. It's all you, you fool.
>
>If someone were to incorrectly interpret one of Nostradamus' prophecies
>would you then conclude that Nostradamus is a false prophet? No! It just
>might be that the interpreter produced an incorrect interpretation. That is
>true in this case.
>
>So if you're concluding that Sollog is inaccurate based on the above, then
>you really are a dummy.
Sure, JP, sure. Those voices you hear in your head aren't real people,
you know.
By the way, Thanks for the video. The 2 meg version is a hoot. I got
it on Kazaa. It's better than the 17 Meg one, because the laff track
and the subtitles make it so funneeeeee.
Plus you save bandwidth.
TruthSeeker
158 magnitude 6 quakes? Where did you get that number from? Even if it
were true, the earth quake that occured on April 23 connects perfectly to
Sollog's warning. It was on Easter, it was at the exact latitude of Easter
Island and it was 6.6 magnitude (a .1 difference of the actual number he
gave, 6.5). According to this site it was the only significant quake in the
whole month of April in the entire world.
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
It's a hit you fool!!
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
The same fucking pages you got your stupid claim from. Can't you read,
JP?
> Even if it
>were true, the earth quake that occured on April 23 connects perfectly to
>Sollog's warning. It was on Easter, it was at the exact latitude of Easter
>Island and it was 6.6 magnitude
But Sollog claimed *specifically* it would hit within 100 miles of
Easter Island. Never Anonymous Bud has already shown you up for the
fool you are, JP.
> (a .1 difference of the actual number he
>gave, 6.5). According to this site it was the only significant quake in the
>whole month of April in the entire world.
>http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
>
>It's a hit you fool!!
Only in your fevered imagination, JP. Put down the brass polish. YOu
ain't supposed to drink it.
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
<SNIP>
>> >Pass this WARNING around usenet
>
>That proves my point. A fan of Sollog posted the above message to usenet
>and it's an interpretation of Sollog's writings. Duh!! Sollog never wrote
>that the pope would die on that date, a fan of Sollog did.
Oh, give us a break, JP. Sollog has no fans. It's all you, you fool.
Besides. according to JP's own webshite, written by another suck
poppet of JP Ennis himself:
http://www.247news.net/2002/20020823-pope.shtml
Pope John Paul II to DIE on 20th of September!
Missed again, JP.
You need to edit your webshite. Unfortunately for you, it's also all
over Google.
BWAHAHHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHHAH!!
TruthSeeker
This article explains why it is within 100 miles:
http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
>
>
>
> > (a .1 difference of the actual number he
> >gave, 6.5). According to this site it was the only significant quake in
the
> >whole month of April in the entire world.
> >http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
> >
> >It's a hit you fool!!
>
> Only in your fevered imagination, JP. Put down the brass polish. YOu
> ain't supposed to drink it.
I'm not JP moron!
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
<SNIP>
>>
>> But Sollog claimed *specifically* it would hit within 100 miles of
>> Easter Island. Never Anonymous Bud has already shown you up for the
>> fool you are, JP.
>>
>
>
>This article explains why it is within 100 miles:
>http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
What, another JP vanity site/ BWAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHA.
Mental gymnastiics noted.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> > (a .1 difference of the actual number he
>> >gave, 6.5). According to this site it was the only significant quake in
>the
>> >whole month of April in the entire world.
>> >http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
>> >
>> >It's a hit you fool!!
>>
>> Only in your fevered imagination, JP. Put down the brass polish. YOu
>> ain't supposed to drink it.
>
>I'm not JP moron!
No, your'e JP Ennis.
Wally Anglesea™
<wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:16:36 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
>wrote:
>>I'm not JP moron!
>
>No, your'e JP Ennis.
and you *are* a moron.
TruthSeeker
> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>
> >Wow, you really showed me. Not!! You're such an idiot. Calling me
names
> >without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
>
> No, YOU are definitely a moron if you buy ANY of the bullshit
> that SlopDogs followers spew on a daily basis.
>
> >How about this challenge. Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
> >quake:
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en
&scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
>
> A) There was NO quake on Easter Sunday anywhere near Easter Island.
>
> B) There has been NO quake anywhere close to 6.5 anywhere near
> Easter Island in recoded history.
>
This article explains why the quake was technically within 100 miles of
Easter Island.
http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
> Now, if you want to EXTEND the distance, you can claim a hit
> on a quake WELL over 100 miles from Easter Island, In fact,
> it was almost 3000 miles from the predicted location!
>
Read it.
http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
> >If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
> >magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned.
> >It occured on the same
> >line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
> >Estero is an anagram for Easter!!
>
> But the prediction was NOT for something almost 3000 miles from Easter
Island,
> it SPECIFICALLY SAID 'within 100 miles of Easter Island'.
>
> So, not EVEN close, asshole.
>
> >In fact, it was the only significant quake in all of April 2000!
>
> That's NOT what the USGS database shows.
>
Actually, when I use the word "significant", I'm referring to quakes over
6.5 just like on this table:
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
So according to that definition, it is the only significant quake in April
2000!!
>
> >Prove what I say above is false!!
>
> Done, easily.
>
Keep trying, monkey!!
TruthSeeker
"Wally AngleseaT" <wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
message news:49rorvc7qf3mvtjkt...@4ax.com...
Well since you want to take every word literally, the quake warning said the
quake would be greater than 6.5 and if you do a search for quakes greater
than 6.5 magnitude, you will find only 50 such quakes occured. So your
number of 158 doesn't mean anything!!
That means one of those magnitude quakes occured about once every week. And
the quake Sollog warned of occured on the exact day he warned on the exact
latitude of the location he warned of. And like I said before, it occured
in Santiago Del Estero. Estero is an anagram for Easter. The probability
of all these things aligning so perfectly is low, but it did happen! It's a
hit!!
Running low on bananas monkey???!!!
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>This article explains why the quake was technically within 100 miles of
>Easter Island.
>http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
Technically? Technically?
BWAAHAHHAHAHAH.
Your stretching JP.
>
>
>> Now, if you want to EXTEND the distance, you can claim a hit
>> on a quake WELL over 100 miles from Easter Island, In fact,
>> it was almost 3000 miles from the predicted location!
>>
>
>Read it.
>http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
>
>> >If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
>> >magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned.
>> >It occured on the same
>> >line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
>> >Estero is an anagram for Easter!!
>>
>> But the prediction was NOT for something almost 3000 miles from Easter
>Island,
>> it SPECIFICALLY SAID 'within 100 miles of Easter Island'.
>>
>> So, not EVEN close, asshole.
>>
>> >In fact, it was the only significant quake in all of April 2000!
>>
>> That's NOT what the USGS database shows.
>>
>
>Actually, when I use the word "significant", I'm referring to quakes over
>6.5 just like on this table:
>http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
>So according to that definition, it is the only significant quake in April
>2000!!
BFD, a mag 6 occurs on average every couple of days. 158 in 2000.
Postdicting is your forte though, huh, JP.
>
>
>>
>> >Prove what I say above is false!!
>>
>> Done, easily.
>>
>
>Keep trying, monkey!!
He did, kook. referring to you own webshites continuously as evudence
of support is very kooky, JP. But then you know that already, huh?
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>
BZZZTT!!! wrong, claptrap boy. You're not very good at this are you?
You have to add ALL the quakes greater than 6.5. So you have to add
the 14 Mag 7's and the Mag 8 Fuck you r statistics up big time,
doesn't it JP?
Why? Because even using your figures, that gives us 71 quakes above
6.5 in 2000.Better than one a week. Add to that the FACT, that it was
NOWHERE NEAR EASTER ISLAND, and NOWEHERE NEAR EASTER ISLANDS
Latitudes, and you are shown to be a fuckwit trying to make the data
fit the "prediction"
>
>That means one of those magnitude quakes occured about once every week. And
>the quake Sollog warned of occured on the exact day he warned on the exact
>latitude of the location he warned of. And like I said before, it occured
>in Santiago Del Estero. Estero is an anagram for Easter.
Nope. Wrong.
You *might want to learn a little spanish, and maybe a bit of history
of the region.
>The probability
>of all these things aligning so perfectly is low,
Well, using your metal gymnastics, you were able to postdict., JP.
>but it did happen! It's a
>hit!!
>
>Running low on bananas
Nope, want another one, monkey?
By the way, about that Pope thing, JP.
Wally Anglesea™ >
I must be on drugs cuz that didnt make no sense and isnt what
coincides with the facts. gosh Im a butthead.
> Why? Because even using your figures, that gives us 71 quakes above
> 6.5 in 2000.Better than one a week. Add to that the FACT, that it was
> NOWHERE NEAR EASTER ISLAND, and NOWEHERE NEAR EASTER ISLANDS
> Latitudes, and you are shown to be a fuckwit trying to make the data
> fit the "prediction"
golly, I really am the fukwit for writing that load of crap. I and
everyone
can see that quake sollog predicted strangely occurred on the same
line of latitude that was easter island. Not to mention I didn't even
try to prove the article explaining the connections was wrong. gosh, I'm
a dumb poop head.
>
> >
> >That means one of those magnitude quakes occured about once every week. And
> >the quake Sollog warned of occured on the exact day he warned on the exact
> >latitude of the location he warned of. And like I said before, it occured
> >in Santiago Del Estero. Estero is an anagram for Easter.
>
> Nope. Wrong.
I mean I'm wrong, sorry.
> You *might want to learn a little spanish, and maybe a bit of history
> of the region.
becauz you'd see how easter island was also a part of chile which
strangely was another interesting fact since that means the location
sollog named was prophetically allegorically connected to being
within 100 miles of the location sollog gave. wow. Imagine that,
pretty damn interesting and amazing how sollog used the same style of
codes that nostradamus used. If I wasn't such a poop head, I would have
realized that and tried to use my puny poop brain to analyze that part
of his prophecy.
I'm sure a poop head. sollog is definitely a real prophet.
> >The probability
> >of all these things aligning so perfectly is low,
>
> Well, using your metal gymnastics, you were able to postdict., JP.
sorry for calling you JP. I knwo your not and don't have any proof,
but lying is the only way I can win debates. gosh I'm such a poop head.
>
> >but it did happen! It's a
> >hit!!
> >
> >Running low on bananas
>
> Nope, want another one, monkey?
>
> By the way, about that Pope thing, JP.
why do I keep bringing up something I know doesn't prove a thing?
cuz I m a poop head. sorry. Sollog is my best buddy. I really
know he's the great prophet, but I don't want anyone else to know
I really agree with him.
Wally Anglesea™ >
>
> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>
> >without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
>
> that SlopDogs followers spew on a daily basis.
well I wouldn't believe it if you could prove him wrong. You should
try it sometime, but I already know you can't because you are a poop
head
like me.
> >How about this challenge. Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
> >quake:
> >http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en&scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
>
> A) There was NO quake on Easter Sunday anywhere near Easter Island.
well, if you consider or admit we're reading a newsgroup about prophecy,
sollog made a very interesting hit since the latitude line
easter island is on happened to also be the same line where
the quake occurred which is only a coincidence to someone
who doesn't know anything about how nostradamus writes or what
prophecy is. Are you admitting that you're a poop head like me?
do you admit there was a quake on the day sollog said and
that it was the only such quake in that mag which occurred in
all that month? sure you do if you're not a poop head like me.
>
> B) There has been NO quake anywhere close to 6.5 anywhere near
> Easter Island in recoded history.
but I don't think it matters if sollog can show using
prophecy terms how there is a huge coincidence between
the line of latitude, that easter island was a part of chile,
and chile was within 100 miles of where the quake occurred.
what say you mr poop head? if you argue, you look much
more poopy.
>
> FILE CREATED: Thu Nov 20 00:46:11 2003
> Geographic Grid Search Earthquakes= 1
> Latitude: 27.000S - 28.000S
> Longitude: 109.000W - 110.000W
> Catalog Used: PDE
> Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
>
> CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE
>
> PDE 1998 02 12 064840.93 -27.40 -109.88 10 5.10
>
> So, a 5.1, in 1998, is the ONLY quake anywhere near Easter Island
> in the USGS database.
still doesn't matter mr poopy pants.
>
> Now, if you want to EXTEND the distance, you can claim a hit
> on a quake WELL over 100 miles from Easter Island, In fact,
> it was almost 3000 miles from the predicted location!
why do you keep avoiding the facts I mentioned above?
gosh, I know. because if you try to argue the points, you look
more of a poop head and your poopy arguement fails.
>
> >If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
> >magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned.
> >It occured on the same
> >line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
> >Estero is an anagram for Easter!!
>
> But the prediction was NOT for something almost 3000 miles from Easter Island,
> it SPECIFICALLY SAID 'within 100 miles of Easter Island'.
is this a prophecy analyzing discussion group? then why are you
ignoring
the prophetic points which show a hit?
are you as poopy as your arguement looks?
>
> So, not EVEN close, asshole.
is where the quake happened at the same latitude of easter island?
it sure was. you really do hate to admit that don't you poopy boy?
it looks like sollog was more than close, asshole. everything he said
can
be prophetically and clearly connected if you know how to decypher codes
used by
prophets just like nostradamus did. sollog got the right date. it was a
quake that doesn't occur very often. and you can see the odd coincidence
how the codes he used were similar to nostradamus and hit the location
in that respect. I'd like to see you get closer. Or anyone for that
matter if its nothing special.
> >In fact, it was the only significant quake in all of April 2000!
>
> That's NOT what the USGS database shows.
there only 29 quakes in 2000 magnitude 6.8 plus
>
> CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE
>
> PDE 2000 04 03 152001.98 4.08 125.61 150 6.20
> PDE 2000 04 07 190827.83 -18.05 65.52 10 6.30
> PDE 2000 04 13 205414.09 10.30 126.52 33 6.00
> PDE 2000 04 18 172812.39 -20.66 -176.47 220 6.00
> PDE 2000 04 21 043517.69 51.42 -178.14 33 6.20
> PDE 2000 04 23 092723.32 -28.31 -62.99 608 7.00
> PDE 2000 04 23 170117.47 -28.38 -62.94 609 6.10 ..
how about admitting there were none in the South American hemisphere.
only sollogs in that month.
>
> >Prove what I say above is false!!
>
> Done, easily.
not even close upon careful evalution of the evidence. so sorry
mr poopy pants.
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> What crap about the pope??
C'mon now truth(LOL)seeker, you know what I mean, the countless
number of times the pope was to have dies and still hasn't.
>The pope hasn't even died yet so you can't say any of his predictions
> about the popes death have failed. Once the pope
> dies, you will see how it aligns to one of Sollog's prophecies.
Yeah it's called postdiction and *that's* all soiled ever does, if you want
to believe he's some sort of psychic that's up to you but you really
shouldn't
whine so much when you attempt to convince other people such stupid things
as how Argentina is "technically" Easter Island.
> His sniper profile was actually pretty accurate.
So was the FBI's and so were those of many reporters but he was still
completely wrong.
> You don't know anything about my situation so don't make stupid
assumptions!
So you've been lying when you say you're a student then? even though
you're posting from the University of Illinois, perhaps you're faculty then?
whatever you're still there aren't you? or you gonna pretend you're in a
cave like ol davey boy does.
> You're the biggest jerk out there Krib. The majority of your posts are
> verbal attacks. Go back to playing with your balls you nuisance!
Verbal attacks? like yours when people show you the truth about your
stupidity?
> Here, I'll offer you the same challenge:
I visited the websites you posted and I still don't believe that you
can be so stupid as to believe that is a hit, but then you also believe
that soiled actually causes earthquakes too don't you? there's just
no helping morons like you is there?
> Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
Why? you can't prove he did, it's always "allegory" or "technically" or
some other fairy tales, with you retards.
> Prove what I say above is false!! You can't do it because it's absolutely
> true. Sollog predicted that quake. And it's just one of many quake
> predictions.
ROFLMAO, you really get yourself excited don't you schoolboy.
> Now shut your mouth you monkey!!!!
Oh my, this must be the sort of "verbal attack" you were crying about
just a few lines ago, yet again it's ok for you sheep to do it but not
your detractors, hypocrisy plays a large part in your lives doesn't
it sheep.
You really believe that TPN and Biblio are different people do you?
you really believe dave sees you sheep as anything other than revenue
generators? You buy the porn, fake pics, crash photo's and all the other
garbage that fraud offers too do you?
You're so unbelievably stupid it's amusing. Talk to you soon kookboi ;0)
--
krib
TruthSeeker
"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
>
> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> news:c0_ub.1653$aw2.7...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
> > What crap about the pope??
>
> C'mon now truth(LOL)seeker, you know what I mean, the countless
> number of times the pope was to have dies and still hasn't.
>
> >The pope hasn't even died yet so you can't say any of his predictions
> > about the popes death have failed. Once the pope
> > dies, you will see how it aligns to one of Sollog's prophecies.
>
> Yeah it's called postdiction and *that's* all soiled ever does, if you
want
> to believe he's some sort of psychic that's up to you but you really
> shouldn't
> whine so much when you attempt to convince other people such stupid things
> as how Argentina is "technically" Easter Island.
>
> > His sniper profile was actually pretty accurate.
>
> So was the FBI's and so were those of many reporters but he was still
> completely wrong.
>
> > You don't know anything about my situation so don't make stupid
> assumptions!
>
> So you've been lying when you say you're a student then? even though
> you're posting from the University of Illinois, perhaps you're faculty
then?
> whatever you're still there aren't you? or you gonna pretend you're in a
> cave like ol davey boy does.
>
Hmmm. Has someone been digging into my personal information??? Wow, now
I'm convinced that you're a creep!! Like I said before, you don't know my
situation or my plans for the future so you can't judge me. I never denied
being inside the United States because I don't lie like many of you do. The
location I'm currently at is much safer than any big city in the USA. So if
you stay in a big city and you don't believe what I say, then don't get mad
when you get nuked to dust.
I bet you know all of my info by now don't you Krib? You probably know my
name, phone #, address, social security #, etc. What a creep!! I guess I
should expect some weirdo, moron named Krib to come to my door looking for
me. I'll have my shotgun ready!
> > You're the biggest jerk out there Krib. The majority of your posts are
> > verbal attacks. Go back to playing with your balls you nuisance!
>
> Verbal attacks? like yours when people show you the truth about your
> stupidity?
>
> > Here, I'll offer you the same challenge:
>
> I visited the websites you posted and I still don't believe that you
> can be so stupid as to believe that is a hit, but then you also believe
> that soiled actually causes earthquakes too don't you? there's just
> no helping morons like you is there?
>
> > Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
>
> Why? you can't prove he did, it's always "allegory" or "technically" or
> some other fairy tales, with you retards.
>
> > Prove what I say above is false!! You can't do it because it's
absolutely
> > true. Sollog predicted that quake. And it's just one of many quake
> > predictions.
>
> ROFLMAO, you really get yourself excited don't you schoolboy.
>
> > Now shut your mouth you monkey!!!!
>
> Oh my, this must be the sort of "verbal attack" you were crying about
> just a few lines ago, yet again it's ok for you sheep to do it but not
> your detractors, hypocrisy plays a large part in your lives doesn't
> it sheep.
>
Hardly hypocritical. Want to know why? Because I already presented my
argument and all the facts so now I can attack you all I want. The reason
I'm complaining about your verbal attacks because that's all you do!! You
don't debate anything, you just attack. I debate then I attack. So take
that you fucktard.
(IMPORTANT NOTE: fucktard - noun, a fucking retard. This word may be used
to describe such people as Krib, Wally Anglesea, Never anonymous Bud, and
other braindead morons who doubt Sollog)
> You're so unbelievably stupid it's amusing. Talk to you soon kookboi ;0)
> --
Hehe. The funny thing is you think you're right but I know I'm right.
Perhaps you'll make better decisions in your next life.
PS. Don't go digging into my personal information, you creep!!!
TruthSeeker
"Phoenix" <eat....@be.merry> wrote in message
news:bpj0pg$bl2$7...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> In article <5l%ub.1796$aw2.7...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com>, TruthSeeker
> That's pathetic, Ennis. I win lottery money on worse odds than that!
>
This shows how stupid you are. Where do you get 1 in 3 chance from??
You're a fucking idiot. I said 50 quakes occured of magnitude 6.5 or
greater in all of the year 2000. So it's about a 1 in 7 chance for guessing
the exact date of such a quake. But you have to realize the only quake of
that magnitude that occured in April was on the exact date Sollog warned
of!!! It also occured on the exact line of latitude of the location Sollog
warned of. The odds of that are extremely low but you morons will say it
was a coincidence.
> > That means one of those magnitude quakes occured about once every week.
And
> > the quake Sollog warned of occured on the exact day he warned on the
exact
> > latitude of the location he warned of. And like I said before, it
occured
> > in Santiago Del Estero. Estero is an anagram for Easter.
>
> Not unless "o" is an "a" on your planet.
>
I can't believe you're arguing about this. An 'o' is very similar to an 'a'
so it's a perfect anagram. Haven't you seen the type of anagrams that
Nostradamus uses in his prophecies??? Do you even believe in prophecy???
Wow, I'm adding you to the list of fucktards.
(IMPORTANT NOTE: fucktard - noun, a fucking retard. Some examples of
fucktards are such people as Krib, Wally Anglesea, Never anonymous Bud,
Pheonix and
other braindead morons who doubt Sollog)
Mwahahahaha
TruthSeeker
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:NA2vb.7756$n56....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
LOL!! I guess you're finally admitting that you're a fucktard, Wally. Good
for you. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> Hmmm. Has someone been digging into my personal information???
Perhaps if you weren't quite so stupid you'd realise this, so called,
"personal
information" has been put where it is by yourself, but given you are willing
to believe that a cheap porn peddler is the self proclaimed word of God it
comes as no surprise to realise you don't.
> Like I said before, you don't know my situation or my plans for the
> future so you can't judge me.
I judge you solely on your idiot appearances here and on soiled's forum,
where you're begging for help ;0) other than that I don't know nor care
about you at all schoolboy.
> So if you stay in a big city and you don't believe what I say, then don't
> get mad when you get nuked to dust.
I have to admit that if I get "nuked to dust" I shall be very angry indeed
and will write several letters complaining about it.
> I bet you know all of my info by now don't you Krib? You probably know my
> name, phone #, address, social security #, etc. What a creep!! I guess I
> should expect some weirdo, moron named Krib to come to my door looking for
> me. I'll have my shotgun ready!
You flatter yourself moron but no surprise there eh?
> Hardly hypocritical. Want to know why?
Nah, I notice you avoided my questions again so I can't be bothered with
any more of your immature lies. If you believe that estero is an anagram
of easter and that argentina is "technically" easter island that's your
problem. I guess your education system is worse than it looks.
> Hehe. The funny thing is you think you're right but I know I'm right.
> Perhaps you'll make better decisions in your next life.
Most little kids like you believe they are always right, it's a sure
sign of immaturity, you have no experience of anything so why would
you be expected to know the truth?
Try not to cry so much, there's a good little kid ;0)
--
krib
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> LOL!! I guess you're finally admitting that you're a fucktard, Wally.
Good
> for you. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Can't recognise the work of one of your fellow sheep schoolboy?
I guess you are as dumb as you appear. try googling on your
fellow fan bushnuked, Z, Zee, amie, lifeistoh etc etc and see just
what a real scuzbag you weirdo's attract and who you're going to end
up like ;0)
--
krib
TruthSeeker
"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
Of course I know the post is not really from Wally you dumbass. Of course
you already know I realize this obvious fact, but you just want to spread
lies about me and make me look bad. You are such a fucking, annoying prick.
The funniest thing of all is that you think my age has something to do with
my intelligence. You think that the fact that you're older than me means
you're always right and I'm always wrong. If you believe this, then you're
even dumber than I originally thought. I bet that I am smarter than you are
right now and you will never reach anywhere near my intelligence. Doing the
things that I do requires true brain power, something you are lacking. So
you can shove all that schoolboy crap up your ass!
Cujo
news:bpj6vl$rag$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> In article <jg8vb.2486$aw2.8...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com>,
> Gee, I get money off worse odds than that too.
>
>> But you have to realize the only quake of
>> that magnitude that occured in April was on the exact date Sollog
>> warned of!!!
>
> Wrong.
>
>> It also occured on the exact line of latitude of the location Sollog
>> warned of.
>
> That would be nice, if a line had been mentioned.
>
>> The odds of that are extremely low but you morons will say it
>> was a coincidence.
>
> I might say it was if you hadn't FUBAR'd the prediction.
>
>> > > That means one of those magnitude quakes occured about once every
>> > > week.
>> And
>> > > the quake Sollog warned of occured on the exact day he warned on
>> > > the
>> exact
>> > > latitude of the location he warned of. And like I said before,
>> > > it
>> occured
>> > > in Santiago Del Estero. Estero is an anagram for Easter.
>> >
>> > Not unless "o" is an "a" on your planet.
>> >
>>
>> I can't believe you're arguing about this. An 'o' is very similar to
>> an 'a' so it's a perfect anagram.
>
> Uh...yeah.
>
>> Haven't you seen the type of anagrams that
>> Nostradamus uses in his prophecies??? Do you even believe in
>> prophecy???
>
> Definitely. I have outpredicted you 6 times so far.
>
>> Wow, I'm adding you to the list of fucktards.
>>
>> (IMPORTANT NOTE: fucktard - noun, a fucking retard. Some examples
>> of fucktards are such people as Krib, Wally Anglesea, Never anonymous
>> Bud, Pheonix and
>> other braindead morons who doubt Sollog)
>>
>> Mwahahahaha
>
> WOOHOO!!!1! LEVEL 19, HERE I COME!!! One more and I'm going to have
> to make room on my SomrerO rack!
>
> Oh, and due to your persistent cluelessness in how to effectively
> defend your failed prophecies, I return the kind gesture by nominating
> you for Clueless Newbie of the Month.
Seconded.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the 8/2000 & 2/2003 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
Official TruKook(tm) as certified by Ed Wollmann. Meow.
"Trust me, the astrological ramblings are not realistic, pragmatic, or
applicable in real counseling or consulting scenarios either." - Ed,
being
realistic, pragmatic and kooky.
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> you just want to spread lies about me
And just exactly what lies have I spread about you little kd?
> and make me look bad.
LOL you don't need my help for that, you're very adept at
making yourself look stupid, it seems you believe the letters
o and a are interchangeable ;0)
> You are such a fucking, annoying prick.
Ya know what sonny, you come here to apn, post your stupidity in a
public forum for anyone to see then get your yourself all bent out
of shape when you are shown the error of your ways but, as usual for
little kids like you, it's somebody else's fault isn't it? figures ;0)
> The funniest thing of all is that you think my age has something to do
with
> my intelligence.
That's another error on your part then. I think your youth colours
your judgement and your lack of experience combined with your
obvious immaturity leads you to erroneous conclusions. Your belief
that a fraudulent porn peddling scumbag has predicted anything
is your problem, if you then come here and insist that it is factual
how can you whine when people that don't believe that say so?
You can easily solve this, keep your opinions on soiled to places
where they're welcome, easy isn't it?
> You think that the fact that you're older than me means
> you're always right and I'm always wrong.
Yet another error on your part. I can't help your stupidity but I'm
ever so willing to point it out to you.
> I bet that I am smarter than you are right now and you will never
> reach anywhere near my intelligence. Doing the things that I do
> requires true brain power, something you are lacking. So
> you can shove all that schoolboy crap up your ass!
So you're still avoiding the questions though, funny thing about
someone with your, much vaunted, "intelligence" you let an obvious
fraud and liar think for you, why is that?
Yeah sure, you talk the talk kid but that's all. ;0)
--
krib
Cardinal Chunder
> "Cardinal Chunder" <c...@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
> news:bpe2q...@enews3.newsguy.com...
>
>>TruthSeeker wrote:
>>
>>>trully amazed.
>>
>>awful and laughably bad predictions for what they are.
>>
>>How come the pope isn't dead?
>>
>
>
> Why are you morons still complaining about the pope not being dead? Did
> Sollog give an exact specific, date that the pope would die? NO. Did
> Sollog ever say anything like "the pope will die on August 4, 2002?" NO.
> So stop bitching about the pope!
Yes Slopshit gives date after date, year after year via one deranged and
obvious sock puppet after another. One example of his dribble (from 1997
no less)
http://www.theeunderground.net/Features/features129pope.shtml
> Look at the quake predictions I posted and don't rush to judgement.
The predictions are all laughable failures, being variously wrong,
scattershot, vague and ambiguous. It's laughable you start the list with
the awful 'Easter Island' quake prediction.
And are you going to point out all the hopeless failures you/his
kookship has made over the years? I'm sure Elizabeth Smart would be
interested to know how she was sacrificed in a satanic ritual for example.
Are you just stupid?
Take the meds kook.
Cardinal Chunder
> In fact, it was
> the only significant quake in all of April 2000! It occured on the same
> line of latitude as Easter Island and it occured in Santiago Del Estero.
> Estero is an anagram for Easter!! It's an obvious hit to see, if you're
> brain is not clogged up.
It's an obvious hit if you run into a wall a few times. Otherwise it is
a laughable and obvious miss.
Easter Island is not within a hundred mils of Argentina kook.
> Prove what I say above is false!!
Yeah proving a negative is something everyone wants to waste their time
doing. But in this instance no proof is required - the prediction is
obviously wrong.
Cardinal Chunder
Except it wasn't within 100 miles of Easter Island *or* Chile. I know
you're terminally stupid, so yet again here is the map which
demonstrates it was 544 kilometers away.
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/images/easter-island-quake.jpg
So explain again how it was a hit.
Wally Anglesea™
<john...@lowgenius.com> wrote:
>You! Yes, YOU, Cujo (cu...@petitmorte.newt)! Behind the alt.usenet.kooks
>sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
>>> Oh, and due to your persistent cluelessness in how to effectively
>>> defend your failed prophecies, I return the kind gesture by nominating
>>> you for Clueless Newbie of the Month.
>>
>> Seconded.
>>
>
>Thirded. This is shaping up to be a foine month for kookhunting.
Fourthed.
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
<SNIP>
>>
>
>I can't believe you're arguing about this. An 'o' is very similar to an 'a'
>so it's a perfect anagram.
What? Are you this stupoid all the time, or do you practice, JP?
>Haven't you seen the type of anagrams that
>Nostradamus uses in his prophecies???
Oh, yeah, the same postdiction stretching and mental acrobatics
happens with Nostradamus followers as happens with you. However, the
Nostradamus industry makes money.
That must really grate on you, JP.
> Do you even believe in prophecy???
>Wow, I'm adding you to the list of fucktards.
>
>(IMPORTANT NOTE: fucktard - noun, a fucking retard. Some examples of
>fucktards are such people as Krib, Wally Anglesea, Never anonymous Bud,
>Pheonix and
>other braindead morons who doubt Sollog)
>
>Mwahahahaha
Are you in a rubber room, JP?
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>Sollog give an exact specific, date that the pope would die? NO.
YES! Over and over again, new dates each time.
He EVEN tried to pass off the death of ANton Levey as fulfilling his prediction.
>Did Sollog ever say anything like "the pope will die on August 4, 2002?" NO.
Not recently, but THAT is because he's dead.
YOU, on the other hand, recently posted that the Pope would die
on Oct. 9th (or was it the 8th), VERY specifically.
>Look at the quake predictions I posted and don't rush to judgement.
I ALREADY debunked ANY possibility that SlopDog predicted that quake,
you brain-dead zombie.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>the only significant quake in all of April 2000!
Lies, lies, and MORE LIES!
I've ALREADY shown that it was almost 3000 miles from Easter Island,
AND that there were many other 'significant' quakes in April 2000!
Wally Anglesea™
Anglesea™ <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>>
>> >but it did happen! It's a
>> >hit!!
>> >
>> >Running low on bananas
>>
>> Nope, want another one, monkey?
>>
>> By the way, about that Pope thing, JP.
>
>why do I keep bringing up something I know doesn't prove a thing?
>cuz I m a poop head. sorry. Sollog is my best buddy. I really
>know he's the great prophet, but I don't want anyone else to know
>I really agree with him.
Lame, even for kook.
Hey JP, now about the Pope predictions. Have you figured out a new
excuse yet?
BY the way, I love the Sollog Video. I got it on Kazaa. Very funny
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>6.5 just like on this table:
>http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
So, you're going to IGNORE the fact that there are quakes as small
as 4.5 on that list, That list shows quakes that caused injury, OR that
were 6.0 or larger, NOT 6.5.
Again, caught in a lie. But that IS what we expect from you.
Wally Anglesea™
someone else, a cowardly kook,, wrote.
>Never anonymous Bud wrote:
>>
>> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
>> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>>
>> >Wow, you really showed me. Not!! You're such an idiot. Calling me names
>> >without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
>>
>> No, YOU are definitely a moron if you buy ANY of the bullshit
>> that SlopDogs followers spew on a daily basis.
>
>well I wouldn't believe it if you could prove him wrong. You should
>try it sometime, but I already know you can't because you are a poop
>head
>like me.
Lame, loser. Why is it kooks are so afraid, I wonder.
<SNIP>
I loved Sollog's 2 meg video. It was very cool. I found it on Kazaa.
The laff track and new subtitles were awesome.
TruthSeeker
> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>
> >Actually, when I use the word "significant", I'm referring to quakes over
> >6.5 just like on this table:
> >http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/sig_2000.html
>
> So, you're going to IGNORE the fact that there are quakes as small
> as 4.5 on that list, That list shows quakes that caused injury, OR that
> were 6.0 or larger, NOT 6.5.
>
>
> Again, caught in a lie. But that IS what we expect from you.
>
What lie?? I made a simple mistake and now I'm admitting it. The list also
includes quakes that caused death, damage, etc. And it includes quakes of
magnitude 6.5 or greater. Read it you dummy!! Tell me how exactly that
affects my argument?? It doesn't! It's still a fact that the quake on the
23rd of April was the only quake on the entire earth greater than magnitude
6.5 in the month of April 2000!! Here's the list of quakes in April you
dick for brains:
FILE CREATED: Thu Nov 20 15:33:22 2003
Global Search Earthquakes= 7
Catalog Used: PDE
Date Range: Year: 2000 - 2000 Month: 04/Day: 01 Month: 04/Day: 30
Magnitude Range: 6.0 - 9.9
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE IEFM DTSVNWG
DIST
NFPO
km
TFS
PDE 2000 04 03 152001.98 4.08 125.61 150 6.20 MwGS ...G .......
PDE 2000 04 07 190827.83 -18.05 65.52 10 6.30 MwHRV ...G .......
PDE 2000 04 13 205414.09 10.30 126.52 33 6.00 MEGS ..FG .......
PDE 2000 04 18 172812.39 -20.66 -176.47 220 6.00 MwHRV ..FG .......
PDE 2000 04 21 043517.69 51.42 -178.14 33 6.20 MLPMR .FFG .......
PDE 2000 04 23 092723.32 -28.31 -62.99 608 7.00 MwGS .FFG .......
PDE 2000 04 23 170117.47 -28.38 -62.94 609 6.10 MwGS ..FG .......
Now, what the fuck do you have to say to that? Keep trying monkey!!!
TruthSeeker
> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>
> >If you actually visit the above links, you will see that a quake of
> >magnitude 6.6 occured on Easter day, just as Sollog warned. In fact, it
was
> >the only significant quake in all of April 2000!
>
> Lies, lies, and MORE LIES!
>
> I've ALREADY shown that it was almost 3000 miles from Easter Island,
> AND that there were many other 'significant' quakes in April 2000!
>
You're the one who is lieing. Read the damn quake warning again:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en&scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
It says the quake will be greater than 6.5. The only quake greater than
magnitude 6.5 in the entire month of April 2000 was the quake that occured
on April 23. Stop spreading your ridiculous lies. Here's a list of all the
quakes greater than 6.5 in April 2000. There's only one quake on the list
you fucktard and it happened on the exact day Sollog warned on the exact
line of latitude of Easter Island!!!
FILE CREATED: Thu Nov 20 15:43:41 2003
Global Search Earthquakes= 1
Catalog Used: PDE
Date Range: Year: 2000 - 2000 Month: 04/Day: 01 Month: 04/Day: 30
Magnitude Range: 6.5 - 9.9
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE IEFM DTSVNWG
DIST
NFPO
km
TFS
PDE 2000 04 23 092723.32 -28.31 -62.99 608 7.00 MwGS .FFG .......
So shut the fuck up monkey!!!
PS. If you haven't realized it yet. I'm not Sollog. So stop spreading
your lies.
Michael Johnathan McDonald
lol! He uses the same lines on everyone... What a loser this Krib is!
---
'I may flame people and use bad language… ' - Krib 2003! ;)
LuLLo
<john...@lowgenius.com> wrote:
>You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
>alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
>> This article explains why it is within 100 miles:
>> http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
>
>Because after the event, Snorelog retro-dicted is by saying that when he
>SAID "within 100 miles of easter island" he really MEANT "Northern
>Chile?"
>
>Seek. Professional. Help.
>
>uhoh, i'm getting another message from BEyond!
>
>UPDATE TO PREVIOUS QUAKE PREDICTION.
>
>IN ORDER TO FULLY COMPLY WITH SOLLOG'S PARAMETERS FOR PREDICTION AND
>COLLECT THE TEN THOUSAND DOLLAR REWARD OFFERED, WE ARE TIGHTENING THE
>PARAMETERS OF OUR PREDICTION.
>
>AN EARTHQUAKE OF MAGNITUDE 3.5 +/- 1 WILL STRIKE WITHIN 100 MILES OF
>ANCORAGE, ALASKA, ON NOVEMBER 23, 2003 +/- 3 DAYS. IT WILL BE AT AN
>APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF 35 MILES +/- 10 MILES.
>
Wel, this is exactly why Sollog doesn't describe it like above. Keep
it obscure and throw in some garbage language so that if it is not a
hit, someone else comes in and matches the goofy patterns to an event
that is correct. Works all the time, Nosty did it too!
In the land of Ice in the shape of a Polar Bear a trembling will be
felt.
<--(Well above sentence is obvious, Alaska or Canada, so if the quake
misses, some goof can place it at Canada rofl) -->
The ship drops its anchor and it withers with age
<--(If we did correct and a quake would happen at anchorage, someone
will tie this to Anchorage in some obscure and twisted logic ,another
rofl)-->
Buildings will survive and people can go on about their businesses
<--(You should get the picture by now, minor earthquake. I have
trouble coming up with the next sentence, something which points
vagely to november 23 +/- 3 days -yet another rofl)-->
Ask and learn from Sollog, he uses that language. Why he should be
using mystical language baffles me because if he would be correct he
would plainly point it out to us.....
LuLLo
wrote:
>This article explains why the quake was technically within 100 miles of
>Easter Island.
>http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
ROFLMAO omg omg omg, truthseeker are you not xbiblio? He "technically"
pushes the "pope-death-date" in front of him until one day the Pope
dies and he can shout "Another hit for Sollog!"
In making your case for Sollog, this post blew it big time... better
stop making a fool of yourself.
TruthSeeker
Sollog wrote about the Easter quake:
The Easter quake occured on April 23, 2000 on the exact day Sollog warned.
According to the USGS it was magnitude 7(a rare quake, only 20 quakes of
this magnitude in the year 2000). In the quake warning, Sollog said a
magnitude 6.5 or greater quake would occur. I did a search using the USGS
database and found that only 60 quakes of magnitude 6.5 or greater occured
in the year 2000.
60/365=.1644
So there was about a 16% chance that a quake would occur on the day Sollog
warned. But we also have to consider the fact that the quake occured on the
exact same latitude as Easter Island. On a map, there are 90 degrees north
and 90 degress south for latitude. So there are a total of 180 degrees of
latitude. The probability of the quake being on that specific line of
latitude is 1/180=.0055555. So there was only a .55% chance that a quake
can occur on a specific line of latitude.
To get the final probability of these things aligning, you must multiply the
above two numbers. So you have (60/365)*(1/180)=.0009134. This is about a
.1% chance that all these things could happen. And guess what they did
happen!! So Sollog's Easter quake prediction defied probability.
Even if you take into account the fact that earthquakes might occur more
often at certain latitudes, the quake prediction still defies probability.
Plus the added fact that the quake occured in Santiago Del Estero. Estero
is an anagram for Easter. Also, Easter Island is part of Chile. The quake
was about 100 miles away from Chile, just as the quake warning stated. This
is an absolute, undeniable hit!!
PS. If you think you can come up with a better calculation for the
probability of this event aligning to Sollog's quake warning then go right
ahead. Make sure to post all of your mathematical calculations just as I
have done.
TruthSeeker
"John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943AA89D9D74jo...@216.168.3.44...
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> > you fucktard and it happened on the exact day Sollog warned on the exact
> > line of latitude of Easter Island!!!
>
>
> Your "hit" was at 28.307 south.
>
Ok, so the latitude was off by one fucking degree. Who gives a fuck?? It's
still remarkable that the latitude of the quake is that close to the
latitude of Easter Island. The probability that the quake would be on that
latitude is still about 1.667% so it's still a hit.
> The only way that's "on the exact line of latitude" as Easter Island is if
> you live in an extremely warped world, or - per usual - you're working
with
> ridiculously loose tolerances, like the idiots who claim the "fire at 45
> degrees" prophecy in Nostradamus is somehow related to NYC, in spite of
the
> fact that NYC is actually at 40 degrees.
>
Actually the correct translation is "fire at 40 and 5 degrees". This means
40.5 you dumbass. So Nostradamus was correct.
Now go back to your miserable life you fucktard.
And if you haven't realized it yet, I'm not JP!
Never anonymous Bud
<clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>40.5 you dumbass. So Nostradamus was correct.
SO I guess that means, for you, that the phrase
in the classic nursery rhyme of "4 and 20 blackbirds
baked in a pie" would mean 4 and 1/5th??
>And if you haven't realized it yet, I'm not JP!
Oh, THAT is something everyone realized LONG ago.
But you ARE as stupid AND annoying as he was.
Starshine Moonbeam
Henry"(john...@lowgenius.com) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> > There's only one quake on the list
> > you fucktard and it happened on the exact day Sollog warned on the exact
> > line of latitude of Easter Island!!!
>
> The EXACT latitude of EAster Island is between 27d03m and 27d12m south.
>
> Your "hit" was at 28.307 south.
>
> The only way that's "on the exact line of latitude" as Easter Island is if
> you live in an extremely warped world
ding ding ding
Check out his website www.sollog.com
--
mhm 31x9
Smeeter #28, 29, or 30
Alcatroll Labs Inc. (Division of Incendiary Devices)
StArSHiNe_MoOnbEAm aT HoTMaIL DoT cOM
"My candle burns at both ends. It will not last the night;
but ah, my foes, and oh, my friends, it gives a lovely light."
-- Edna St. Vincent Millay
Starshine Moonbeam
"TruthSeeker"(clou...@aol.comabc) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
>
> "John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns943AA89D9D74jo...@216.168.3.44...
> > You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> > alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
> >
> > > There's only one quake on the list
> > > you fucktard and it happened on the exact day Sollog warned on the exact
> > > line of latitude of Easter Island!!!
> >
> > The EXACT latitude of EAster Island is between 27d03m and 27d12m south.
> >
> > Your "hit" was at 28.307 south.
> >
>
> Ok, so the latitude was off by one fucking degree. Who gives a fuck??
Then it's not prophecy. Ain't no gray area on prophecy. Either it is, or
it isn't.
Yours isn't.
Starshine Moonbeam
"Phoenix"(eat....@be.merry) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
> In article <4p_ub.1688$aw2.7...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com>, TruthSeeker <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote:
>
> > "Wally AngleseaT" <wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
> > message news:62sorvg0k5hhn0ld8...@4ax.com...
> > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:29:15 GMT, "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >"Cardinal Chunder" <c...@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
> > > >news:bpe2q...@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > > >> TruthSeeker wrote:
> > > >> > I've been looking into all of Sollog's past quake warnings and I've
> > been
> > > >> > trully amazed.
> > > >>
> > > >> Yeah, because you're a dribbling sock puppet incapable of seeing the
> > > >> awful and laughably bad predictions for what they are.
> > > >>
> > > >> How come the pope isn't dead?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >Why are you morons still complaining about the pope not being dead? Did
> > > >Sollog give an exact specific, date that the pope would die? NO. Did
> > > >Sollog ever say anything like "the pope will die on August 4, 2002?" NO.
> > > >So stop bitching about the pope!
> > >
> > > One of your suck poppets posted this, nitwit, or did you forget?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Posted: 24 Sep 2003 08:33 pm Post subject: POPE TO DIE OCTOBER 8th
> > > >2003 - 100803 (183) 13th day of MOON
> > > >Can it be the DAY OF DEATH has come for John Paul II aka POPE OF THE
> > > >CATHOLIC CHURCH aka POPE OF SATAN
> > > >
> > > >Sollog's 902 Prophecy pointed to the 13th Day of the New Moon in
> > > >October and the IDES OF AUGUSTUS
> > > >
> > > >That's the 8th of October this year 2003
> > > >
> > > >10 - 08 - 03
> > > >
> > > >Since 1995 Sollog has said THE DAY OF THE DEATH OF THE POPE WILL BE 1
> > > >8 3
> > > >
> > > >10 - 08 - 03
> > > >
> > > >1 - 8 - 3
> > > >
> > > >Ides of Augustus
> > > >
> > > >13th day 8th Month
> > > >
> > > >October is based on Octavius Augustus
> > > >
> > > >Octo is EIGHT in Latin
> > > >
> > > >13th is the ides of the MOON the 15th day can also be an ides since in
> > > >Rome the 13th and 15th are both ides
> > > >
> > > >So 8th Day 10th Month 03 the year
> > > >
> > > >08/10/03 in euro dating
> > > >
> > > >drop the zeros
> > > >
> > > >8 1 3
> > > >
> > > >8 - 13 or IDES OF AUGUSTUS
> > > >
> > > >Things are ALIGNED for a MAJOR HIT for Sollog when the old frail pope
> > > >just happens to die on a clear date hit for Sollog's famous POPE
> > > >PROPHECY
> > > >
> > > >Will it occur?
> > > >
> > > >Or did we change HIStory by pointing to it?
> > > >
> > > >Pass this WARNING around usenet
> >
> > That proves my point. A fan of Sollog posted the above message to usenet
> > and it's an interpretation of Sollog's writings. Duh!! Sollog never wrote
> > that the pope would die on that date, a fan of Sollog did.
>
> This has got to be one of the lamest backpedals I have ever seen. Johnnie can't face
> the music so he claims a fan wrote it instead. Pathetic.
It's still him. He's his only fan. So even the backpedal doesn't carry
him very far. Just enough to go off the cliff and do a swan dive.
Krib
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abook...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Using my proven methodology of claudulent gobbledeygook I have
spent 13.365 seconds studying X.72 and here is how it decrypts...
From Burbank defrays a fraud
on day release from the ward
his every word just a lie
can't tell the truth will not try
Now this show us, (and all you lurkers out there), just how
the deffraieur will appear as a mentally subnormal patient
who poses as a middle aged schoolboy unable to graduate
due to his retardation.
Elsewhere the gobbledeygook shows us, (and all you lurkers),
how under some of his many guises he talks to himself in the
strange world of APN and pretends he is normal.
Much, much more to follow.
clever eh this gobbledeygook?
--
fraude
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> Ok, so the latitude was off by one fucking degree. Who gives a fuck??
Obviously you do, one minute you're going on how this postdiction was
a remarkable hit and challenging people to prove you wrong, when they
do just that you throw a tantrum.
So now it appears not only are random letters interchangeable that
inaccurate co-ordinates are also acceptable, yet you wonder why
people mock your claims?
> Now go back to your miserable life you fucktard.
And just a few posts back you were whining about people atttacking
you, you still can't see your hypocrisy?
> And if you haven't realized it yet, I'm not JP!
You're just his vacuous mouthpiece, so much for your self proclaimed
intelligence that you let someone else tell you how to think.
--
krib
John Griffin
> That proves my point.
>A fan of Sollog
Ennis, "Sollog's" fan, nutcase of a thousand names.
>posted the above
> message to usenet and it's an interpretation of Sollog's
> writings. Duh!! Sollog never wrote that the pope would
> die on that date, a fan of Sollog did.
You're seriously in need of some therapy.
You dumb asshole, when you make up a new puppet, it exists only
in your demented fantasy. To normal people, it's just you.
> If someone were to incorrectly interpret one of
> Nostradamus' prophecies would you then conclude that
> Nostradamus is a false prophet? No!
A million gullible fools try to put some meaning to
Nostradamus's whimsies. One of their interpretations happens to
coincide with an actual event. You're dumb enough to infer from
that accident that he was a "true prophet."
>It just might be that
> the interpreter produced an incorrect interpretation. That
> is true in this case.
<snicker> There are no "incorrect" interpretations of
Nostradamus's meaningless bullshit. Each one is as "correct" as
any other. Very few of them are as amusing as your attempts to
interpret your own stupid "prophecies."
> So if you're concluding that Sollog is inaccurate based on
> the above, then you really are a dummy.
Some people, i.e., people who had never heard of you before,
concluded that you're inaccurate (world record euphemism) when
you said an earthquake near the U.S-Canada border was really
simultaneous major quakes in New York City and Los Angeles.
Every time you post one of your idiotic messages, a few more
people find out that you're nothing.
Everything you have ever posted has proven to be "inaccurate."
Most of it has also proven dumb as hell.
Your record of 100% wrong is the least of your problems. Why
don't you have balls enough to drop the futile "fan" act? You're
the only one it fools.
"Looks like the world will be crying on 9/11 again"
"Behold these deaths are proof GOD CONTROLS ALL THINGS
Behold these deaths are proof JESUS IS NOT GOD
Behold these deaths are proof SOLLOG IS GODS WORD"
--Idiot "Sollog," 10/21/2003
Behold it ain't happenin', airhead.
Wally Anglesea™ >
> striking on easter day. That was 20-Apr-2000. There are NO quakes
> recorded on that date, which is actually pretty amazing - it's a rare day
> on this planet that there's not an earthquake somewhere.
so you're a poop head like me it seems? I guess you're too much of
a poop head to realize or disprove the fact that
the only quake over 6.5 that occurred on easter was the quake sollog
said would occur on easter. got it retard? or does this not register
with
your little poopy brain? go right ahead and show how smart you are
re-fuk-tard. ;0)
>
> located within 100 miles of easter island. The closest quakes to easter
> island within 2 months either side of that date were in argentina, which is
> some 2400 miles from easter island. 2400, for those of you keeping score
> at home, is a little over 100. unless of course you're talking about the
> easter island inside the arctic circle near the northwestern coast of
> greenland, in which case you're even farther off-base; the closest quakes
> to THAT area I find was off the coast of Oregon - three thousand miles away
> - and Iceland - fifteen hundred miles away.
>
> Other than those 5 quakes - 2 in Argentina and Iceland, one in Oregon -
> EVERY quake that occurred within 60 days of your prediction struck on the
> other side of the planet - indonesia, fiji, japan, and turkey.
>
> I'll be a nice guy and grant you the magnitude - listed as 7.0 - in spite
> of the fact that the quake in question was three days late and 2300 miles
> off location.
>
> Your boyfriend was wrong. Deal.
I'll be you wish he was your boyfriend you queer.
besides, if you consider or admit we're reading a newsgroup about
prophecy,
sollog made a very interesting hit since the latitude line
easter island is on happened to also be the same line where
the quake occurred which is only a coincidence to someone
who doesn't know anything about how nostradamus writes or what
prophecy is. Are you admitting that you're a poop head like me?
do you admit there was a quake on the day sollog said and
that it was the only such quake in that mag which occurred in
all that month? sure you do if you're not a poop head like me.
but I don't think it matters if sollog can show using
prophecy terms how there is a huge coincidence between
the line of latitude, that easter island was a part of chile,
and chile was within 100 miles from the quake.
what say you mr poop head? if you try to argue those facts, you look
much
more poopy.
is this a prophecy analyzing discussion group? then why are you
ignoring the prophetic points which show a hit?
is where the quake happened at the same latitude of easter island?
it sure was. you really do hate to admit that don't you poopy boy?
it looks like sollog was more than close, asshole. everything he said
can be prophetically and clearly connected if you know how to decypher
codes
used by prophets just like nostradamus did. sollog got the right date.
it was a
quake that doesn't occur very often. in fact, there were no
6.5 quakes in all of april you poopmeister, and you can see the odd
coincidence
how the codes he used were similar to nostradamus and hit the location
in that respect. I'd like to see you get closer. Or anyone for that
matter if its nothing special.
somehow I expect you're just too big of a pooptard to show all these
points to be
wrong. and somehow I expect you and many other pooptards here to ignore
these
facts and continue posting immature personal attacks to substitute for
your
intellectual inadequacies. so very sad it is.
bye bye queer boy
Wally Anglesea™ >
>
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> > http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
>
> Because after the event, Snorelog retro-dicted is by saying that when he
> SAID "within 100 miles of easter island" he really MEANT "Northern
> Chile?"
>
> Seek. Professional. Help.
me thinks you should, because you refuse to admit or refute all the
prophetic
connections that show a hit which was previously outlined in my post
which you and everyone here has yet to disprove. I know you can't
anyways,
so this is a rhetorical statement. And I know this is why you and others
who are among the dumbest most ignorant monkeys on the planet, attack
sollog
with immature abuse that never once gives any intellectual reasoning or
evidence to prove your absurd claims.
fact 1: this is a -prophecy- discussion group.
fact 2: being a P.D.G., a person who writes a prophecy has the
latitude (pun intended) to claim a hit based upon the use of
prophetic codes in the style of nostradamus, just as nostradamus
is given credibility when such connections align.
fact 3: given that license, if you objectively analyze the codes used,
they do in fact validate what sollog has claimed as a hit.
fact 4: the definition of a quake includes the epicenter and
area the waves of the quake affect. If easter isle is considered
to be a part of chile, then it is reasonable and valid especially
in prophecy, to call this a direct hit from a prophetic standpoint
because anyone that study's prophetic codes can see how
a prophet might use a location (chile) to represent or symbolize
easter island. If easter isle cannot be proven to be in fact, part of
chile, then your arguement is valid. So go ahead and prove EI is not
part of chile. since it is and the quake hit and affected an area
about 100 miles from chile, there is no way to call this a miss. In a
literal sense you can in a way, but the hit being claimed is done so
based
on certain codes valid in a seer, whether it be nostradamus or sollog,
using
using these codes. they did. and they can claim a hit if the hit falls
within
these codes. you look really dumb trying to say miss when the facts I
stated
prove otherwise.
fact 5: the quake on easter a) hit the line of latitude of easter
island, b) hit within 100 miles (using a basic prophecy code) of
where sollog said ie easter island aka chile (easter island is part of
chile--a fact). c) was the only quake in the hemisphere sollog pointed
to
over 6.5 in the entire month.
fact 6: you won't be able to show any of the facts stated are wrong
because
facts cannot be disproven. sorry.
bye turd brain
Wally Anglesea™ >
>
> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> > What crap about the pope??
>
> C'mon now truth(LOL)seeker, you know what I mean, the countless
> number of times the pope was to have dies and still hasn't.
>
> >The pope hasn't even died yet so you can't say any of his predictions
> > about the popes death have failed. Once the pope
> > dies, you will see how it aligns to one of Sollog's prophecies.
>
> Yeah it's called postdiction and *that's* all soiled ever does,
no. its called postdiction by those ignorant of prophetic writing
and simple basic codes that true prophets choose to use. You can
call it postdiction if you want. but anyone knowledgeable in the
field of prophetic writing especially nostradamus, can see how
sollog is prophesying within accepted styles of coding. Because
your a fucktard and can't understand such basic things, doesn't
mean sollog or what is claimed as a hit is wrong.
if you want
> to believe he's some sort of psychic that's up to you but you really
> shouldn't
> whine so much when you attempt to convince other people such stupid things
> as how Argentina is "technically" Easter Island.
its already been shown and explained why its a hit. And I don't recall
anyone saying argentina was chile. so stop lying and get the facts on
whats being said as to that.
> > Prove to me that Sollog didn't predict this
>
> Why? you can't prove he did, it's always "allegory" or "technically" or
> some other fairy tales, with you retards.
the challenge and burden of the challenge is on you to show how using
allegory isn't valid for a prophet to use. and then the challenge is
for you to show how the explanation and facts in the explanation
are in error. If you can't, then your whole argumenmt is irrelevant.
If this wasn't a prophecy group, your point would be valid. how can
you come into a prophecy group that is all based upon coded writings
and call someone using the same codes, wrong as you have? you can't get
more ignorant and stupid than that. your words here are some of the
most ignorant I've ever seen and its really sad that you don't
realize it.
even more pathetic is how you spend your free time arguing about things
you don't even believe in. You say you come here to amuse yourself. If
only
you realized what a fool you look like and are trying to prove prophecy
wrong with literal arguments. you need to get a life if this is how
you get your fill of entertainment. Whats amusing is how ignorant you
are and that you don't reaize it.
Wally Anglesea™ >
> Easter Island is not within a hundred mils of Argentina kook.
no one said was you re-fucking tard. If you read the eplanation,
you would have know that. But I know you have which is why
you won't answer and refute the points given that prove the hit.
> > Prove what I say above is false!!
>
> Yeah proving a negative is something everyone wants to waste their time
> doing. But in this instance no proof is required - the prediction is
> obviously wrong.
when you can prove it, go right ahead.
Wally Anglesea™ >
> >
> >>Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> >><clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
> >>
> >>
> >
> > names
> >
> >>>without even investigating the links I posted. YOU are the moron.
> >>
> >>No, YOU are definitely a moron if you buy ANY of the bullshit
> >>that SlopDogs followers spew on a daily basis.
> >>
> >>
> >>>quake:
> >>
> >>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sollog+easter+island+mourn&start=10&hl=en
> >
> > &scoring=d&selm=200004210315.XAA14974%40cotse.com&rnum=15
> >
> >>A) There was NO quake on Easter Sunday anywhere near Easter Island.
> >>
> >>B) There has been NO quake anywhere close to 6.5 anywhere near
> >> Easter Island in recoded history.
> >>
> >
> >
> > This article explains why the quake was technically within 100 miles of
> > Easter Island.
> > http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
> >
> >
> >
> >>on a quake WELL over 100 miles from Easter Island, In fact,
> >>it was almost 3000 miles from the predicted location!
> >>
> >
> >
> > Read it.
> > http://www.theeunderground.com/Features/features294easterquake.shtml
> >
> >
>
> Except it wasn't within 100 miles of Easter Island *or* Chile. I know
> you're terminally stupid,
truthseeker isn't the one refusing to refute laid out facts from
a clear detailed explanation showing a simple fact how the quake
did occur within 100 miles of chile and easter isle. I guess that means
your brain died long ago.
Wally Anglesea™ >
>
> Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, "TruthSeeker"
> <clou...@aol.comabc> scribbled:
>
> >Why are you morons still complaining about the pope not being dead? Did
> >Sollog give an exact specific, date that the pope would die? NO.
>
> YES! Over and over again, new dates each time.
no he didn't
>
> He EVEN tried to pass off the death of ANton Levey as fulfilling his prediction.
yeah. I saw that. And I'm still trying to find someone that can show
where that explanation was wrong.
Wally Anglesea™ >
silence speaks volumes.
Wally Anglesea™ >
see how ridiculous and ignorant this group is?
Krib
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:gqqvb.9313
> no. its called postdiction
Which is what I said. But given your sleazy record of posts
you have no chance of anyone taking you seriously. Go back to
your anal fantasies, scumbag, you're everything that soiled stands
for and a perfect example of the mindless retard that acts as his
mouthpiece.
--
krib
TruthSeeker
> You! Yes, YOU, Wally AngleseaT <"
> (wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> >> striking on easter day. That was 20-Apr-2000. There are NO quakes
> >> recorded on that date, which is actually pretty amazing - it's a rare
> >> day on this planet that there's not an earthquake somewhere.
> >
> > so you're a poop head like me it seems?
>
>
> > I guess you're too much of
> > a poop head to realize or disprove the fact that
> > the only quake over 6.5 that occurred on easter
>
> fucking retarded that you can't tell the difference between the 20th and
> the 23rd?
>
> > was the quake sollog
> > said would occur on easter. got it retard? or does this not register
> > with
> > your little poopy brain? go right ahead and show how smart you are
> > re-fuk-tard. ;0)
>
>
> 20 != 23.
>
> A != O
>
> EVERYTHING I REALLY NEEDED TO KNOW, I LEARNED IN KINDERGARTEN! HOW BOUT
> THAT SHIT~!
>
> Now go ahead and prove what a credulous rube and/or lying fraud you are
> by insisting that 20 = 23 and A = O.
>
> >> located within 100 miles of easter island. The closest quakes to
> >> easter island within 2 months either side of that date were in
> >> argentina, which is some 2400 miles from easter island. 2400, for
> >> those of you keeping score at home, is a little over 100. unless of
> >> course you're talking about the easter island inside the arctic
> >> circle near the northwestern coast of greenland, in which case you're
> >> even farther off-base; the closest quakes to THAT area I find was off
> >> the coast of Oregon - three thousand miles away - and Iceland -
> >> fifteen hundred miles away.
> >>
> >> Other than those 5 quakes - 2 in Argentina and Iceland, one in Oregon
> >> - EVERY quake that occurred within 60 days of your prediction struck
> >> on the other side of the planet - indonesia, fiji, japan, and turkey.
> >>
> >> I'll be a nice guy and grant you the magnitude - listed as 7.0 - in
> >> spite of the fact that the quake in question was three days late and
> >> 2300 miles off location.
> >>
> >> Your boyfriend was wrong. Deal.
> >
> > I'll be you wish he was your boyfriend you queer.
>
>
> > besides, if you consider or admit we're reading a newsgroup about
> > prophecy,
>
> about k00ks, where you are eminently on-topic. The last time I read apn
> was several years ago, when I got into a pleasant discussion, including
> polite disagreement and intelligent, meaningful argument for position,
> with Peter L., who I respect, even though I think he errs on the side of
> incredulity - although not to the degree that idiots like you err on the
> side of credulity.
>
> > sollog made a very interesting hit since the latitude line
> > easter island is on happened to also be the same line where
> > the quake occurred which is only a coincidence to someone
> > who doesn't know anything about how nostradamus writes or what
> > prophecy is.
>
> since 1950. I think that he had some fairly amazing hits, I think he
> also had some pretty massive misses. Such is the nature of prophesy; the
> future is a range of possibilities, not a constant, fixed, state, and any
> number of things can intervene between point A and point B to invalidate
> what otherwise may have been an accurate prediction.
>
> > Are you admitting that you're a poop head like me?
> >
> >
> > do you admit there was a quake on the day sollog said
>
> credulous marks for cash by attaching his name to Nostradamus, said the
> quake would be on Easter - April 20th. The only quake that occurred
> anywhere near that time was on the 23rd, which is not "the day Sollog
> said." You seem to have a real fucking problem getting it through your
> thick skull that the 23rd is not the 20th. In your world, apparently, 2
> + 2 = 4.6
>
Look at you. You can't even get your fucking facts straight. I'm about to
make you look like the dumbass you really are. Do some fucking research.
In the year 2000 Easter day was the 23rd you fucking dipshit. So shut your
mouth monkey!! You need to know what you're talking about be for you start
yapping. What do you have to say about that? Feel stupid yet?
> > sollog got the right date.
>
> So you still insist that 20 = 23. Your clue-resistance is staggering.
>
Shut up. Easter day was the 23rd of April in 2000 you dumb fuck!!
Now go back to your hole and try to revise your argument because you just
exposed yourself as a moron.
Wally Anglesea™
<john...@lowgenius.com> wrote:
>You! Yes, YOU, Wally Anglesea™ <"
>(wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>)! Behind the
>alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
>Wally, you know you can cancel these legit, right?
If I get them quickly enought. I've had losers do this before. It
means I'm getting to them :-))
--
Lt. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
Wally Anglesea™
<"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote:
>Krib wrote:
>>
>> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
>> news:c0_ub.1653$aw2.7...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
>> > What crap about the pope??
>>
>> C'mon now truth(LOL)seeker, you know what I mean, the countless
>> number of times the pope was to have dies and still hasn't.
>>
>> >The pope hasn't even died yet so you can't say any of his predictions
>> > about the popes death have failed. Once the pope
>> > dies, you will see how it aligns to one of Sollog's prophecies.
>>
>> Yeah it's called postdiction and *that's* all soiled ever does,
>
>no. its called postdiction by those who know Sollog is a fraud, and I, "truthseeker" am a pathetic loser.
HTH
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
Wally Anglesea™
Anglesea™ <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote:
>another post of undeniable facts I suspect will be ignored. Can you
>see how ridiculous and ignorant this group is?
>
>TruthSeeker wrote:
How many sock puppets do you need, loser?
Responding to yourself is a sign of madness, you know.
TruthSeeker
"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
>
> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> news:xgivb.3296$aw2.9...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
> > Ok, so the latitude was off by one fucking degree. Who gives a fuck??
>
> Obviously you do, one minute you're going on how this postdiction was
> a remarkable hit and challenging people to prove you wrong, when they
> do just that you throw a tantrum.
>
> So now it appears not only are random letters interchangeable that
> inaccurate co-ordinates are also acceptable, yet you wonder why
> people mock your claims?
>
HAHAHAHA!!
I'm arguing with a bunch of lesser minds. You guys don't understand
probability at all so how can I argue with you? I'm at least assuming you
guys know how to add, subtract, divide, and multiply so I'll prove
mathematically that this was indeed a hit.
There were only 60 quakes of 6.5 or larger magnitude in the year 2000 so
for anyone to guess the exact date, which Sollog did, is 16% probable. Now
we have morons saying "the degree of latitude where the quake struck is off
by one degree from where Easter Island is located". What you fools don't
realize is that doesn't affect the probability much at all. The probability
of a quake striking on a certain latitude +/- 1 degree is sin(theta1) -
sin(theta2). I won't even go through how I derived that equation because
you guys are too stupid to understand. In this case, Easter Island has a
latitude of 27 so theta1=28, theta2=26. sin(28)-sin(26)=.0311 (Hehe 113
for all you Sollog fans)
You have to multiply that number by .5 because it was in the correct
hemisphere. so 0.0311*.5=0.01555
This means it is about 1.555% probable for a given quake to strike on the
line of latitude of Easter Island, +/- 1 degree. Now you have to include
the fact that it was only 16% probable that a quake above magnitude 6.5
would occur on that exact day.
So 0.01555*0.16=0.002556
That means for all those things to align so perfectly to Sollog's warning is
about 0.255% probable. That is absolute proof that Sollog's warning defies
probability.
Now if you want simpler, less accurate proof that doesn't involve
trigonometry and weighted averages then here it is:
Like I said above there is about a 16% chance that a quake above 6.5
magnitude would strike on the day Sollog warned. If we assume that each
degree of latitude is equally likely then the probability of a quake hitting
any latitude +/- 1 degree is about 3/180=0.01666
So given the above assumption, it is 1.6% likely for a quake to hit within a
certain range of latitude. To get the final probability of both of these
things aligning you just multiply
0.01666*0.16=0.0027
So that is about 0.27% probable that the magnitude and the latitude would
align to Sollog's warning. That defies probability. This is a definite
hit!! I'm sure there are more accurate ways to figure out this probability
but any method you use will get you a result that is most likely in the
range of 0.1% to 1% and that is a very low probability range.
Let me see you morons argue with these numbers. I bet I won't even get a
response because you idiots are still learning how to properly add and
subtract. It's no fun arguing with a bunch of lesser minds who don't even
understand probability. "The Easter quake was one degree off from Easter
Island." Well guess what, I just proved that it doesn't matter!! It's
still highly improbable and it's a hit. Take that, you dummies.
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> HAHAHAHA!!
Says it all doesn't it? you were much funnier under your last 'nym.
--
krib
TruthSeeker
"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
Oh, but the funny part about it is you completely ignored all of my
mathematical calculations just like I predicted. 100% hit!! LOL!! What's
the matter krib, too stupid to understand my explanation of probability??
Thought so...
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> Oh, but the funny part about it is you completely ignored all of my
> mathematical calculations just like I predicted. 100% hit!! LOL!! What's
> the matter krib, too stupid to understand my explanation of probability??
Even funnier is that you are going through all this effort to convince
people that a porn peddling criminal is the word of God. Funnier than that
is you'll jump through hoops trying to convince people that a complete miss
is still a hit because you were told to do so by l9/tpn/biblio/whatever he
calls himself today ;0)
Still think o and a are interchangeable schoolboy?
How's your attacks on Bruce Willis' forum going?
Keep dancing junior ;0)
--
krib
TruthSeeker
"Krib" <kr...@address.invalid> wrote in message
>
> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> news:tPvvb.3947$aw2.1...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
> > Oh, but the funny part about it is you completely ignored all of my
> > mathematical calculations just like I predicted. 100% hit!! LOL!!
What's
> > the matter krib, too stupid to understand my explanation of
probability??
>
> Even funnier is that you are going through all this effort to convince
> people that a porn peddling criminal is the word of God. Funnier than that
> is you'll jump through hoops trying to convince people that a complete
miss
> is still a hit because you were told to do so by l9/tpn/biblio/whatever he
> calls himself today ;0)
>
Hehehe. I posted the original article to this thread because I saw
something amazing and I thought many people need to hear to it. I wasn't
told to do anything. And guess what, I managed to prove beyond a doubt that
Sollog predicted that Easter quake. Numbers speak louder than your trash
talk. I noticed that once again you haven't even tried to debate my
calculations for the probability of the Easter quake. Looks like someone's
too stupid to understand. Notice how all you can do is talk shit. You
can't talk numbers. I even discussed this quake warning with another
individual that's smarter than me and he aslo agreed that Sollog's quake
prediction is highly improbable. So please tell me, why am I arguing with
your dumb ass??
TruthSeeker
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> >
still
> didn't hit Easter Island.
>
>
The funny thing is, you fail to realize that my probability calculation
focuses on the fact that the quake hit very near the same latitude of Easter
Island. That simple fact, along with the fact that the quake hit the exact
day Sollog warned, prove that it was no coincidence. Keep trying monkey!!
messeneger_7
The Nazi's are not a thing of the past. The neonazis are not representative
of the true power, which the real Nazi's still wield world wide. To them
World War 2 is just a lost battle. The WAR goes on, and they are winning it.
They are winning because too many believe it is over, and that Naziism is
no longer a threat. While pseudo Nazis parade in the streets openly, having
little power, the real Nazis move ever closer to the realization of their
long
held goal of world domination. For such are in positions of real power
everywhere, their ties to the Third Reich only rumored about. The Bush
family is a perfect example.
Bush - Nazi Link Confirmed
http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi%20Link
Translation Of Newsweek Article On Bush Nazi Ties
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0306/S00055.htm
Interview with a Prosecutor
http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_loftus_interview
Their success is assured, because sadly our Nation's future is in the hands
of a people drunk on materialism, blinded by self interest, and deluded by
the corporate controlled news media and entertainment industry. In the
wake of the Reagan administration, the news media has become theirs.
Such is obvious to anyone with both eyes open, one upon history, and
another upon what is really taking place now.
TruthSeeker
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
>
> Nice rant, kook. Easter Island is still 2800 miles from where the quake
> hit. 27 is still not equal to 28.5. A is not O. Any major quake
> predicted for "Easter" appears to have about a 60% chance of accuracy.
>
I already proved how the quake being near the same latitude of Easter Island
is very improbable. And where the hell did you get 60% from??? You're just
making these numbers up, while I'm showing exactly how I got my numbers.
Show me exactly how the hell you get 60%?? I already showed that there were
only 60 quakes of magnitude 6.5 for the entire year of 2000, so for anyone
to predict when a quake would occur in that year is about 16% probable not
60% probable. You're a no good liar. Making up numbers. Anything you have
to say from now on means absolutely nothing to me. I won't debate with
liars!!
Krib
"TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> Hehehe. I posted the original article to this thread because I saw
> something amazing and I thought many people need to hear to it.
Nah you're a liar but then we've seen that already with your a=o bull.
> I wasn'ttold to do anything.
biblio says "Go bug Bruce Willis in his forum" within minutes you're
whining about "have to wait for authentication", you do all you're told
like a good sheep.
> And guess what, I managed to prove beyond a doubt that
> Sollog predicted that Easter quake. Numbers speak louder than your trash
> talk. I noticed that once again you haven't even tried to debate my
> calculations for the probability of the Easter quake.
LOL you think your schoolboy equations using Snell's Law is impressive?
you haven't even considered that you can't do a probability analysis on
something when it has been postdicted and that's where your big head and
even bigger mouth let you down.
It would be an impressive thing for soiled to say there'll be a quake at X
on
date Y but he doesn't, he uses vague catch all phrases and you sheep then
all
bleat hit at anything that happens.
So yeah, you keep being impressed by your intellect there celestial or
whatever
you want to call yourself this month, it's obvious you're gullible enough to
believe
any old crud ;0)
> So please tell me, why am I arguing with your dumb ass??
You tell me, if I'm that dumb what does *that* make you?
BTW I have a question for you. If soiled is the word of God as you claim how
can
he ever be wrong about anything? and if soiled can make earthquakes using
EMP
as he claims how can he ever miss once?
QED junior.
--
krib
TruthSeeker
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> >
> > news:fWvvb.4734$4Y6....@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> >>
> >> "TruthSeeker" <clou...@aol.comabc> wrote in message
> >> news:tPvvb.3947$aw2.1...@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com...
> >> > Oh, but the funny part about it is you completely ignored all of my
> >> > mathematical calculations just like I predicted. 100% hit!! LOL!!
> > What's
> >> > the matter krib, too stupid to understand my explanation of
> > probability??
> >>
> >> Even funnier is that you are going through all this effort to
> >> convince people that a porn peddling criminal is the word of God.
> >> Funnier than that is you'll jump through hoops trying to convince
> >> people that a complete
> > miss
> >> is still a hit because you were told to do so by
> >> l9/tpn/biblio/whatever he calls himself today ;0)
> >>
> >
> > Hehehe. I posted the original article to this thread because I saw
> > something amazing and I thought many people need to hear to it. I
> > wasn't told to do anything. And guess what, I managed to prove beyond
> > a doubt that Sollog predicted that Easter quake. Numbers speak louder
> > than your trash talk.
>
>
> > I noticed that once again you haven't even
> > tried to debate my calculations for the probability of the Easter
> > quake.
>
> quake struck within 100 miles of Easter Island on Easter, 2000. Period.
> All of your dickwaving and the laughably huge amount of time you put into
> your little equation - which, by the way, I didn't even bother reading -
> does not change that.
>
> By the way, A is not O, either.
>
> > Looks like someone's too stupid to understand.
>
>
> > Notice how all
> > you can do is talk shit. You can't talk numbers.
>
> 350 > 0.
>
> > I even discussed
> > this quake warning with another individual that's smarter than me and
> > he aslo agreed that Sollog's quake prediction is highly improbable.
>
>
> > So please tell me, why am I arguing with your dumb ass??
>
> prediction, or whoever's it was (I really could care whether you're
> sollog or not, if you're not him you're certainly his intellectual equal
> - that is to say, a complete idiot) was accurate when it simply wasn't.
> There was no Magnitude 6.5 quake within 100 miles of Easter Island on
> Easter, 2000. Deal with it.
>
> One of these days I think I'll take a look at your...er, "Sollog's" other
> predictions and pick them apart too, just for fun and games.
Ha. I already showed how you're a liar in one of my other posts, so now all
of your posts are irrelevant. I don't argue with obvious liars!!
TruthSeeker
> TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc) wrote:
> > That simple fact, along with the fact that
> > the quake hit the exact day Sollog warned, prove that it was no
> > coincidence. Keep trying monkey!!
>
> years I randomly looked at.
>
3 in 5 chance?? Once again you're a lying sack of shit who's making up
numbers!! It's an absolute fact that only 60 magnitude 6.5 quakes occured
during the year 2000 so it is 16% probable for anyone to guess the exact
date of such a quake, and Sollog got the date correct. Where did I get 16%?
Well you just divide 60/365 and you get about 16%. So once again you're
caught lying about numbers. Like I said, all of your posts are now
irrelevant because you're either a liar or you're a dumb ass. Personally, I
think you're both.
> PS: My prediction is getting closer to right:
>
> Magnitude 4.3
> Date-Time Friday, November 21, 2003 at 21:36:13 (UTC)
> = Coordinated Universal Time
> Friday, November 21, 2003 at 12:36:13 PM
> = local time at epicenter
>
> Location 63.147°N, 150.995°W
> Depth 140 km (87 miles) set by location program
> Region CENTRAL ALASKA
> Distances 87 km (54 miles) N (352°) from Petersville, AK
> 93 km (58 miles) NNW (330°) from Chase, AK
> 99 km (61 miles) NNW (341°) from Trapper Creek, AK
> 104 km (64 miles) NNW (334°) from Talkeetna, AK
> 227 km (141 miles) NNW (344°) from Anchorage, AK
>
> Only 41 miles off. That's a LOT closer than 2700! I'm a better SIKIK
> SEER than Sollog!
I guess you don't realize how stupid you really are. Magnitude 4.0 quakes
happen all the time. Sollog predicted a rare quake above 6.5 magnitude on
the exact day. Once again I expose you as a moron. How many times do I
have to make you look stupid????
TruthSeeker
> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
>
> >
> > "John Henry" <john...@lowgenius.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns943AAE9F2D273jo...@216.168.3.44...
> >> You! Yes, YOU, TruthSeeker (clou...@aol.comabc)! Behind the
> >> alt.usenet.kooks sheds! Stand still, laddie!
> >>
> >> [sunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnhip]
> >>
> >> Nice rant, kook. Easter Island is still 2800 miles from where the
> >> quake hit. 27 is still not equal to 28.5. A is not O. Any major
> >> quake predicted for "Easter" appears to have about a 60% chance of
> >> accuracy.
> >>
> >
> > I already proved how the quake being near the same latitude of Easter
> > Island is very improbable.
>
> yau quated. It didn't soy "a quoke will accur within 100 miles of the
> lotitude of eoster islond."
>
> > And where the hell did you get 60% from???
>
> Ane af thase wos claser physicolly to EI; anather wos much claser
> lotitude. Oll three were within 10 degrees of EI lotitude. Laaks ta me
> like the "predictian" was mare af o "trend onolysis."
>
> 3/5 is .6, by the woy. Glod I cauld help. I hape thot you ore beginning
> to understond the difference between o and a, taa.
>
Mwahahahaha!!! You're above argument is manure!!! You're telling me that
Sollog chose Easter Island because there allegedly were 6.5 magnitude quakes
in the past on Easter day?? That is the most retarded thing I've heard in a
while. You're definitely going to get added to the list of fucktards.
I looked at the years from 1995 to 1999 and I didn't even see one quake that
hit on Easter day above magnitude 6.5. The only quake that I did see that
was 1 day off from Easter day, was no where around Easter Island. So once
again, you're caught in a lie. So your argument that Sollog chose the
location Easter Island based on a trend is total horse shit. That 60%
probability that you pulled out of your ass is meaningless. Try again
monkey!!
TruthSeeker
>
> I've come to realize that your rather entertaining mental calisthenics
> aren't solely for the purpose of believing bullshit. You actually
> "think" in these patterns. Amazing. How often does your mail get
> delivered to the wrong...COAST?
>
> > That is the most
> > retarded thing I've heard in a while. You're definitely going to get
> > added to the list of fucktards.
>
>
> > I looked at the years from 1995 to 1999 and I didn't even see one
> > quake that hit on Easter day above magnitude 6.5.
>
> Lessee...
>
> Here's one, although it's actually a 6.4. Of course, if that doesn't
> qualify, neither does Sollog's prophesy, since it was actually a 6.6 and
> he said 6.5:
> APR 13 (1999) 10 38 48.4 21.422 S 176.460 W 164 D 6.4 0.8
> 464
> FIJI ISLANDS REGION. Mw 6.8 (GS), 6.8 (HRV). Me 6.8 (GS).
> Es=4.1*10**14 Nm (GS). Mo=2.1*10**19 Nm (GS). Mo=1.9*10**19
> Nm (HRV). Mo=4.0*10**19 Nm (PPT). Note that this, while being in the
> wrong hempisphere, is within about 30 miles of the EXACT LINE OF LATITUDE
> (as you are so fond of screaming) of Easter Island.
>
> And another, a 7.1:
> MAR 31 (2002) 06 52 50.4 24.279 N 122.179 E 33 7.1 1.0 550
> TAIWAN REGION. MW 7.1 (GS), 7.1 (HRV). mb 6.4 (GS). MS 7.4 (GS). ME 6.9
> (GS). ML 6.8 (TAP). Mo 5.5*10**19 Nm (GS), 5.4*10**19 Nm (HRV). Es 5.1*10
> **14 Nm (GS). At least 5 people killed, 200 injured, 3 buildings
> collapsed and 100 houses destroyed in the T'ai-pei area. Water and gas
> lines were broken and some bridges were damaged. Landslides blocked
> highways in eastern Taiwan. Felt throughout Taiwan. A tsunami of 20 cm
> (peak-to-trough) occurred on Yonaguni-jima, Ryukyu Islands. Recorded (6
> TAP) in I-lan; (5 TAP) in Hua-lien and Miao-li; (4 TAP) in Hsin-chu, Nan-
> t'ou, T'ai-chung, T'ai-pei, T'ao-yuan and Yun-lin; (3 TAP) in Chia-i and
> T'ai-tung; (2 TAP) in T'ai-nan Counties. Also recorded (5 TAP) at T'ai-
> pei and I-lan. Recorded (3 JMA) on Yonaguni-jima; (2 JMA) on Iriomote-
> jima and Ishigaki-jima; (1 JMA) on Miyako-jima, Ryukyu Islands. Note
> that this is within about 8 miles of the EXACT LATITUDE OF EASTER ISLAND,
> as you are so fond of screaming.
>
> And another, a 6.5
> Apr 3 (1983) 02 50 01.1 8.72 N 83.12 W 37 D 6.5 7.3 1.0 318
> COSTA RICA. Ms 7.2 (BRK). Mo=4.8*10**19 Nm (GS). Mo=1.8*10**20 Nm
> (HRV). Five people died from heart attacks, one person killed by a
> collapsing house, and several people injured in southeastern Costa Rica.
> Also felt strongly in southwestern Panama. The focal mechanism is poorly
> controlled and corresponds to reverse faulting.
>
> Of course, this ignores the 2000 quake, which would actually make the
> sample result 4/6, or 75%
>
> Any other questions?
>
> > The only quake that
> > I did see that was 1 day off from Easter day, was no where around
> > Easter Island. So once again, you're caught in a lie. So your
> > argument that Sollog chose the location Easter Island
>
>
> > based on a trend
> > is total horse shit. That 60% probability that you pulled out of your
> > ass is meaningless. Try again monkey!!
>
> were also centered in the same general area, and both within a couple of
> months of Easter. Additionally, because Easter Island sits on the Easter
> Microplate, the entire area is commonly stricken by shallow earthquakes,
> many of significant magnitude (source: Microsoft Encarta Tectonic World
> Map) The strongest earthquake I can find *any* record of - a mag 9.5 -
> was centered in northern Chile. THAT one was felt as far north as
> Virginia. "Predicting" an earthquake in this area is not any more
> impressive than predicting one in Alaska, and quakes in this area have a
> marked tendency to be stronger than average.
>
> Furthermore, only an idiot would take a sample size of five, seriously.
> I did that on purpose, to illustrate just how easy it is to lie with
> numbers. In my sample, 60% of easters had earthquakes. This is
> certainly no more ridiculous than suggesting that Easter Island is in
> north-central Argentina.
>
Do you realize you just admitted that you're an idiot. Here's exactly what
you said in the above paragraph: "only an idiot would take a sample size of
five," yet that's exactly what you did!! You tried to pass off 60% as an
actual fact!! Now you're admitting that it's false information. You
fucking liar. Now you're trying to say that you posted false information on
purpose. That's bullshit!! I caught you lying again and now you're trying
to cover it up by saying you did it on purpose. Fuck you dude. You're
obviously trying to discredit Sollog by using deceptive tactics. Like I
said before, anything you have to say is irrelevant because I proved time
and time again that you're a lying sack of shit! So buzz of loser!!
PS. I'd rather debate with fools like Krib, because at least I know he
doesn't try to lie about facts. You on the other hand...