Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

FACE IN CLOUD PICTURE!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Steve Lawrence

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 6:04:04 AM9/14/01
to
You sad fucker. I just checked out the exact same picture in the newspaper,
and let me tell you there ain't no face!! How sick of you to actually sit
there and try and make some kind of sad internet fucking hoax out of all the
lives which are disappearing in the instant that photo was taken.

Fuck you.


"Rich" <ri...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:_pko7.3132$QV4....@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
> Has anyone seen this?
>
>
>


JJ

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 8:45:16 AM9/14/01
to
Wow, is that batman? He is gonna save us all!!

On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 11:33:17 +0100, "Rich" <ri...@somewhere.com> wrote:

>


James

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 10:42:21 AM9/14/01
to
Before dishing out abuse, why didn't you go to www.cnn.com and see the
video they have on there. You will see the face bulge out from the
smoke and then disappear in around 2 seconds. So, unless CNN decided
to have a 'laugh' and fake a horrific picture, you may want to post an
apology to the person you have insulted.

Also, there is a website mentioned in these messages that has many
pictures on it from the WTC crashes, one of which is taken by a
different camera at a different angle, and you can still still the
face.

Lastly, if you did not see the face in the newspaper's picture then
maybe it was taken before or after the face appeared, seeing as it was
only there for 2 seconds. If it is exactly the same picture, but no
face, then possibly the newspaper altered it to remove the face, due
to the fact that other papers have been bombarded by calls and emails
from readers accusing them of having altered the picture to include a
demonic face.

Think first. Think again. Check things out. Then speak.

Rich

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 10:42:22 AM9/14/01
to
So god damn what? There is a face in every cloud that's ever existed.

People are just hysterical at the moment.

"James" <jamesq...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fe0a42e.01091...@posting.google.com...

dan

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 11:35:13 AM9/14/01
to
you are all so gullible. it's just a stupid hoax. it's just a shot of the
Grinch -- jim carrey in makeup, from the movie last year.

Rich

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 11:35:55 AM9/14/01
to
Actually you're wrong. But I can see the resemblance.

"dan" <x...@a.com> wrote in message
news:kspo7.31092$BS1.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...

Suma_Dartson

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 12:52:26 PM9/14/01
to
"Steve Lawrence" <steve.l...@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message news:<YDko7.935$4j.1...@news.xtra.co.nz>...

You must be blind or something, IT THERE YOU MOTHER FUCKER!!! And it
will haunt your mind til the end of time, and you fucking deserves it.

Artemicion

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 12:52:00 PM9/14/01
to
Nice PhotoShopping. Clearly, I have the original picture on my harddrive and
this one has been edited very clearly. You are truly not a professional.

The enlarged image is more pixelated as you could see on the original one
from CNN. The enlargement in this picture is not pixelated. You just painted
some lines after the enlargement, really nice...

JimMor...@webtv.net

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 1:06:50 PM9/14/01
to
It looked like a clown to me.

anasiz

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 1:45:27 PM9/14/01
to
Right, this is a bad modification... the true one really has a devil face, this
one looks like a clown :)

Matt N

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 2:30:44 PM9/14/01
to
Um since we can't exactly see your harddrive or you pic, then how can you
say "clearly"

"Artemicion" <bgoe...@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:QAqo7.153$NK2....@pollux.casema.net...

Rich

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 3:27:15 PM9/14/01
to
"Artemicion" <bgoe...@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:QAqo7.153$NK2....@pollux.casema.net...
> Nice PhotoShopping. Clearly, I have the original picture on my harddrive
and
> this one has been edited very clearly. You are truly not a professional.
>
> The enlarged image is more pixelated as you could see on the original one
> from CNN. The enlargement in this picture is not pixelated. You just
painted
> some lines after the enlargement, really nice...

WRONG!

It is an exact resized copy of the left image. I didn't paint any lines on.

BMH

unread,
Sep 14, 2001, 3:32:47 PM9/14/01
to

Steve Lawrence wrote:

> You sad fucker. I just checked out the exact same picture in the newspaper,
> and let me tell you there ain't no face!! How sick of you to actually sit
> there and try and make some kind of sad internet fucking hoax out of all the
> lives which are disappearing in the instant that photo was taken.
>
> Fuck you.
>

**It's no hoax. It's legit. It's in all the newspapers, including those here in
England.
I've also seen it from the live video I taped off the air.

BH

>
> "Rich" <ri...@somewhere.com> wrote in message
> news:_pko7.3132$QV4....@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
> > Has anyone seen this?
> >
> >
> >

--
*~*~*
"We all shine on like the Moon & Stars & Sun" ~ Lennon

"All this talk of Jesus coming back to see us.." ~ Elton John/B.Taupin
http://www.angelfire.com/in2/harmony
An unusual journey. "From the end of the world, to your town" EJ/BT


0 new messages