Re: 10 Reasons Sarah Palin Could Win the Repub 2012 Nomination
Lou Proctor
>> Little early ain't it? Damn, give it a rest. In 2006 everybody
> was
>> gearing up for Giuliani vs Hillary.
>
> I agree, but it's necessary part of our partisan media to find front
> running Republicans and take them down, particularly with weak
> Democratic candidates (Gore, Kerry, possibly Obama). Remember the media
> started beating the drum against Dubya early after his election, first
> by saying he didn't really win, then by fixating on flaws or doing
> "Analysis" on how the policies that were helping were hurting, or even
> worse, blaming him for things he had nothing to do with (Katrina, the
> housing bubble bursting).
>
> Establish her as the front runner, create that straw man, then flog it.
>
> Palin being in the news provides a great horse to try and beat dead,
> especially since there are no great Obama triumphs to trump, and dare I
> say with the reveal of stimulus money going to non-existent places, it
> hides certain flaws.
>
> On Palin: Critics never give her policy credit, or say "her energy
> policies make sense" and even worse they never realize that her appeal
> is because she's "normal" and not talking down to people. The 20th
> Century Presidents were mostly war heroes, influential rich family
> offspring or Ivy Leaguers, and it's nice to be governed by your equals
> as opposed to people who think they're you're superiors. That was the
> appeal of Reagan. For all his Hollywood success he never held himself
> "above" you.
>
> We kind of have that extreme now where this administration is "too smart
> to fail." The hubris of Progressive political thought has always been
> that they're smarter, they're our betters, and they have a sense of
> entitlement to tell us right and wrong. Part of their kneejerk
> reactions to "Christian conservatism" is in telling people the right
> wants to shove morality down our throats, when to be forthright, that's
> the whole basis of Progressive politics: to use government to achieve
> what moral order they deem fitting.
>
> It's how we got environmentalism as a religion and gay marriage as a
> civil right, or even higher taxes as patriotic and empathetic. You'll
> note any position against, no matter how reasonable, one is deemed a
> heretic, a bigot or evil. It's never an argument on facts or even
> theoretical outcomes, but rather morality.
>
> Progressives hate Palin because she's a threat to their view on
> superiority in a way many politicians can't articulate. Her likability
> confounds elites on both sides of the aisle.
>
> I sort of happen to think even if you don't like her politically,
> overall, she's what's needed more of in politics.
I consider it a victory that you can no longer post from work or post
using your real name, Jeff Hawkins.
It's so easy to own a fat faced racist.
Lou Proctor
> Yea, what he said. He's better at putting together words than I am. =]
You're both bigoted idiots.
The Republican Party is a KKK meeting thanks to people like you.
rafiki
Thanks for proving his point.
EPIC FAIL.
--rafiki
Thank you drive through.
Lou Proctor
>> > Yea, what he said. He's better at putting together words than I am.
>> > =]
>>
>> You're both bigoted idiots.
>> The Republican Party is a KKK meeting thanks to people like you.
>
> Thanks for proving his point.
He didn't have a point.
You retarded looking dipshit.