Fwd: PING:: Group & Yardy
Non scrivetemi
Usenet.
Which one is this? Eggplant? Mystikal?
In article <Xns9CC9DEFE9...@209.197.12.12>
egbro <eg...@home.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Gang,
> Please don�t mention any nics so I can avoid certin trolls and
> antis; but I�ll verify
> who I am to a couple of you who can PGP the info to others whom they
> should know I want to
> have this:
>
> I hear an ode from a rider adragonback
> The tempo kept by dragonswings flap
> My heart beats faster because at least two will know
> Why the rhythm sets my foot going tap tap tap
>
> - ----------------------------------------------
> "Another verse to say other things:"
>
> A pirate yells "Arg"! Oh! Not a pirate at all.
> But still a ship, mate - named Argos it is.
> Mate? Sounds Australian. An Accidental call?
> Since the Australian Task Force: Named Argos 'tis
> that gives hint for 'u' to find a rat or mole abroad.
> T'would be a task to spell it more plainly.
> Abandon ship! Go home; and guard your treasured hoard.
>
>
> So now knowing who probably had to have composed this, though
> without the ability to send it except through a third party
> messenger; and now knowing whose words to watch or remember,
> which may apply to the favor I am about to ask; can I once
> more even more fervently, emphaticly and beggingly repeat the
> word I've so often said? HELP!!!
>
>
> Are people out there with more smarts and knowledge of the law
> than my vegetablized brain can grasp willing to look up my
> case and give me their advise for winning my appeal? The
> supposed Argonaught I referred to had to have made mistakes in
> communication that may help if we can remember them.
>
>
> Is this a good and legal reason to make contact PGP in a PGP
> group - provided that it's understood that my keys will be
> made available to law enforcement, and of course, the
> decrypted message will have to be mailed here to the prison by
> my messenger where it will be read and copied? I want things
> to stay relatively private from the general public inhabiting
> these groups. If so, I can have the person relaying this PGP
> the questionable warrants, affidavits, indictment, on-line
> activity report, grand jury testimony (with it's obvious
> purposeful misstatements made to intentionally mislead the
> grand jury), etcetera.
>
>
> If people don't want to get involved it's understandable; but,
> of course, I'm hoping that some old friends might try to help
> me beat a life sentence, just for collecting pics, due to some
> trumped up charges that shouldn't apply. I'm sentenced on a
> charge meant to apply to production, which everyone here knows
> I won't have anything to do with (I wouldn't even make
> indices). The language of the statute under the Adam Walsh Act
> [Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2252A (g): Child Exploitation
> Enterprise] is such that the actions are to take place in the
> future, and involve personal interaction with any minor child
> involved, either as a parent, guardian or other person
> (family, friend kidnapper, etc.), providing the child for the
> purpose of the (future) making of child pornography; or as producers
> or photographers purchasing a minor child for the purpose of
> the (future) making of child pornography. They didn't even
> bother charging me with possession, which is the only thing I
> might conceivably be guilty of; but the other trumped up charges
> stuck!!
>
>
> BTW, co-defendants and I got lazy. Believing simplwe text would
> be safe, messages were sent through credit card purchased news
> servers instead of remailers; and proxies were skipped. 3
> steps back and pulling the plug could have saved me! These
> facts should give enough info to tell whether someone may be
> able to help or not. Or at leastsee a possibility.
>
>
> Also, They are saying that a simple "thank you for posting", or
> an acknowledgement of a post, is an admission of receiving! Is
> this fightable? And just mentioning that I ran into a post at
> a specific place that was gotten in a specific way is
> advertizing child porn! Any advise on this?
>
>
> Anyway, gotta go eat!
>
>
> Have fun,
>
>
> Ummm, still me I guess!
>
>
> P.S. Yardy, you should be "in the know" as well, so I have
> both information and a question that only we will be sure of.
> A couple of co-defendants are wanting proof that you are still
> the same uncompromised Yardy we've always known. For the
> record, I can't see you becoming lax enough to get busted
> considering if I had played by all the rules you've kept
> mentioning over the years I wouldn't be in this trouble now.
> But just for my co-defendants' peace (please PGP the answer,
> understanding that law enforcement will be getting the keys
> for the asking): in return for your helping me with proxies
> back in the day, I was so troublesome a student and you put so
> much time and effort into explaining things to me that to
> repay you, or attempt to, I bought you a program I thought
> you'd be interested in and gave it to you along with its
> registration number (which you said I shouldn't have done even
> for you because it could compromise my security); but you said
> you couldn't get it to work. I forget the version, so that is
> unimportant; but what is the name of the program?
>
> As far as the info to show I'm not just someone clowning
> around making lucky guesses: in the course of the pre-trial
> the attempt was made, of course, to get me to snitch on my co-
> defendants and on someone LEA thought I knew that they had not
> caught. (To figure out who snitched is easy. Check the
> sentences. Everyone who didn't snitch got life, except
> Lerch, who - in order to separate the rest of us from his
> K____ Diaries and take the fall himself - plead but refused
> to give evidence). The evidence LEA showed me to try to "prove
> to me they knew that I knew someone involved that had not been
> arrested" were private messages between you and Helen
>
> (decrypted with Helen's key after the arrests). The messages
> concerned someone using the nic E______, who claimed to have
> been getting keys from someone. He said that he had had a
> falling out with the person he had been getting the keys from,
> and he asked to be given keys of his own since he was used to
> having them anyway. [Why anyone would expect a security group
> to just hand them keys to decrypt messages where little known
> security methods were discussed I don't understand at all.]
>
> Helen said s/he thought it was me whom he had gotten the
> keys from, though probably not on purpose, since I often used
> a friend's machine and probably forgot my meds and therefor
> spaced out and left the keys on the friends' computer. Helen
> was wrong, but understandably.
>
> It was a game that backfired. There was no friend whose
> computer I used. I wanted to try a new NSP, so I thought it
> would be fun to use Yardy and Phoenix as an example and become
> two different newsgroup personalities since I was using two
> NSPs. All the discussions between Obliviot and I were between
> me and myself in an attempt to draw others into the threads.
> I really thought I would be caught at it since I picked upthe
> word "Obliviot" in AFY a few months prior to using it and said
> it would make a cool nic and that I was stealing it. The
> person who'd mentioned it said it was fine for me to steal
> it.
>
> I considered a troll personality, but then compared the
> troll posts I could come up with to posts Troll King used to
> make (before he was forcibly subdued and toned down by his
> trip to "deepest, darkest Africa") and realized I could never
> come close to the intelligence and wit he put into trolling.
> (Hi T.K. I hope you are well). But on my own terms and in my
> own way I can liegh with the best of them. So, in keeping with
>
>
> my determination to remain true to my statement that I "try to
> stay reasonably honest in newsgroups" I created my alter ego
> of Obliviot from rarely expressed but real aspects of my
> personality. Even down to the point of Obliviot being
> intimidated by Yardy. Dispite the reputation people have given
> me as a poster, part of me will always be intimidated by and
> in awe of Yardbird/Phoenix. So one of me would make a mistake,
> then the other would correct it. It sort of balances...
> kinda... in a way... maybe.
>
> Anyway, I hope this verifies me and clears up a few points;
> as well as inspiring a bit of legal advice from readers who may be
> connected with the legal profession or otherwise know
> something of the law. I miss you all.
>
>
> Have fun,
>
>
> Stay Safe,
>
>
> ummm... yeah.
>
> _____________________________________
> My Egbro Key
>
<snip>