Lewis wrote:
>>> Besides which, it's not actually an Apple flaw. It's a flaw in *all* ARM
>>> chips.
>
>> I hadn't read that. Got a link?
>
> You just have to read past the clickbait.
>
> It also requires physical access AND requires having already bypassed
> other security.
*If it contains any unpatchable hardware flaws, it's _not_ best in class.*
The logical point is an M1 with _multiple_ known unpatchable hardware flaws
is _not_ best in class by any stretch of the best-in-class definition.
However, I have to give YourName "some" credit as _one_ of the flaws is
also in other designs, but notice I'm informing you iKooks of _two_
unpatchable flaws... and the fact you whooshed on that is typical of you
iKooks.
What's typical of you low-IQ no-education Apple-adoring iKoos is you only
read the clickbait without delving deeper into the cause of the flaws.
The fact Lewis is _desperate_ to minimize one (but he whooshed on the
other) is also rather typical of you low-education low-IQ iKooks.
BTW, I _knew_ you iKooks would miss the point which isn't the severity of
the unpatchable hardware flaws, but the certainty of them in Apple devices.
Why is it certain that all Apple SOC's have built-in hardware flaws?
Because Apple likely spends ten to fifty times the money to advertise that
they "made" the design than Apple spends in actually making the design.
Apple bought almost everything from someone else, which is partly why Apple
has never in its entire history ever designed a best-in-class SOC.
The proof that Apple can't design a best-in-class SOC is simply in knowing
about the unpatchable hardware flaws in _every_ Apple designed SOC.
And no, an M1 with _multiple_ known unpatchable hardware flaws is _not_
best in class by any stretch of the definition of what best in class means.