Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
SpywareBlaster
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Buffalo
May 11, 2012, 10:55:42 AM5/11/12
to
I post a 'new' reply yesterday about a new definition update, but it went
into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the same subject
as an older one, it would automatically go into the old post.
Anyhow, there was a new def update yesterday.
Buffalo
into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the same subject
as an older one, it would automatically go into the old post.
Anyhow, there was a new def update yesterday.
Buffalo
Dustin
May 11, 2012, 11:08:43 AM5/11/12
to
"Buffalo" <Er...@nada.com.invalid> wrote in
news:joj98a$e93$1...@dont-email.me:
Thanks again Great White Buffalo...
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
news:joj98a$e93$1...@dont-email.me:
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
Beauregard T. Shagnasty
May 11, 2012, 11:39:15 AM5/11/12
to
Buffalo wrote:
> I post a 'new' reply yesterday about a new definition update, but it
> went into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the
> same subject as an older one, it would automatically go into the old
> post.
That only happens if you use a newsreader that threads by Subject instead
> I post a 'new' reply yesterday about a new definition update, but it
> went into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the
> same subject as an older one, it would automatically go into the old
> post.
of the proper way by Reference line.
Some readers have options so you can choose.
--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high
Buffalo
May 11, 2012, 1:28:44 PM5/11/12
to
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Buffalo wrote:
>
>> I post a 'new' reply yesterday about a new definition update, but it
>> went into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the
>> same subject as an older one, it would automatically go into the old
>> post.
>
> That only happens if you use a newsreader that threads by Subject
> instead of the proper way by Reference line.
>
> Some readers have options so you can choose.
Buffalo
Dustin
May 11, 2012, 10:59:59 PM5/11/12
to
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.non...@example.invalid> wrote in
news:jojbr3$s9h$1...@dont-email.me:
> Buffalo wrote:
>
>> I post a 'new' reply yesterday about a new definition update, but it
>> went into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the
>> same subject as an older one, it would automatically go into the old
>> post.
>
> That only happens if you use a newsreader that threads by Subject
> instead of the proper way by Reference line.
>
> Some readers have options so you can choose.
>
Hola!
I haven't used Pan in ages... Does it still have the old school look and
feel?
news:jojbr3$s9h$1...@dont-email.me:
> Buffalo wrote:
>
>> I post a 'new' reply yesterday about a new definition update, but it
>> went into my old post. I didn't realize that if the new post had the
>> same subject as an older one, it would automatically go into the old
>> post.
>
> That only happens if you use a newsreader that threads by Subject
> instead of the proper way by Reference line.
>
> Some readers have options so you can choose.
>
I haven't used Pan in ages... Does it still have the old school look and
feel?
0 new messages