Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
ACTA: The new threat to the net
1 view
Skip to first unread message
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 5:18:40 AM1/30/12
to
ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
corporate powers, it would set up a shadowy new anti-counterfeiting body
to allow private interests to police everything that we do online and
impose massive penalties -- even prison sentences -- against people they
say have harmed their business.
Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
500,000 signatures!
http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?tta
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."
Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
corporate powers, it would set up a shadowy new anti-counterfeiting body
to allow private interests to police everything that we do online and
impose massive penalties -- even prison sentences -- against people they
say have harmed their business.
Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
500,000 signatures!
http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?tta
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 5:29:43 AM1/30/12
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:sq-dnQMctqbYDLjS...@bt.com...
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DS...@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.
OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."
bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on
I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 5:59:36 AM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle. is a Troll
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 6:11:39 AM1/30/12
to
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 10:12:14 AM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>500,000 signatures!
You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer fucked. You'll
>Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>500,000 signatures!
never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
touching it (especially in an election year).
Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 10:20:38 AM1/30/12
to
G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>> 500,000 signatures!
>
> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer fucked. You'll
> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
We're all in the same boat!
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>> 500,000 signatures!
>
> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer fucked. You'll
> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
> touching it (especially in an election year).
petition! http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet_action_center_b/?fp
> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 11:01:48 AM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 11:02:28 AM1/30/12
to
Put down the drugs. Seek treatment.
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:5bcdi7111ecjupg3n...@Osama-is-dead.net...
By any means necessary.
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:5bcdi7111ecjupg3n...@Osama-is-dead.net...
By any means necessary.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 11:12:17 AM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle. needs to put down the drugs. Seek treatment.
JohnR
Jan 30, 2012, 11:28:36 AM1/30/12
to
statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!
When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
default terrorists.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 11:28:46 AM1/30/12
to
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 11:34:32 AM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>
>Are you suggesting something other than through democratic elections?
You may read that anyway you like. Fact is, most of our elected
>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>
>Are you suggesting something other than through democratic elections?
officials forgot who they work for. I'm not the only one who thinks they
need to be reminded of their place as "public servants", not a exclusive
club to buy and sell legislation to lobbies.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 11:39:37 AM1/30/12
to
awwwwww, tough guy.
Must be on the dope again.
who you gonna threaten this time?
news:opgdi7hi57lfqhm59...@Osama-is-dead.net...
Must be on the dope again.
who you gonna threaten this time?
news:opgdi7hi57lfqhm59...@Osama-is-dead.net...
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 11:43:14 AM1/30/12
to
framers of the Union put a clause in the Constitution to protect against
a rogue government.
The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
day the US as we know it is no more.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 11:45:47 AM1/30/12
to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War
Lets hope it doesn't come to that again, eh? <rolls eyes>
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 12:42:47 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 12:43:12 PM1/30/12
to
Peter Foldes
Jan 30, 2012, 12:47:57 PM1/30/12
to
news:sq2dnUErCsEd87vS...@bt.com...
belong.You are one screwed up nut and a Troll
< rest of crap snipped>
JS
> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the Internet.
> Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
WTF did you have a need to crosspost this and even post it here where it does not
> Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
belong.You are one screwed up nut and a Troll
< rest of crap snipped>
JS
Peter Foldes
Jan 30, 2012, 12:50:54 PM1/30/12
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Xr2dnVwJs4UKS7vS...@bt.com...
LOL. Exactly and you were nice enough to call your own post that. What a friggin nut
you are
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 1:11:25 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 1:17:10 PM1/30/12
to
I made a post to the groups to which *I* chose to post.
Nothing to do with you old pal. Got that?
Have *you* signed the petition?
You should - in *my* opinion.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 1:21:34 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 1:22:12 PM1/30/12
to
STO0PID CROSS-POST REMOVED. NOT A REPLY.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:17:10 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:sq2dnUErCsEd87vS...@bt.com...
>>> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
>>> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
>>
>>
>> WTF did you have a need to crosspost this and even post it here where
>> it does not belong.You are one screwed up nut and a Troll
>
>
> <cough> <clears throat> *I beg your pardon*?!!
>
> I made a post to the groups to which *I* chose to post.
> Nothing to do with you old pal. Got that?
>
> Have *you* signed the petition?
>
> You should - in *my* opinion.
--
Evidence includes everything that is used to determine or demonstrate
the truth of an assertion. Giving or procuring evidence is the process
of using those things that are either presumed to be true, or were
themselves proven via evidence, to demonstrate an assertion's truth.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:17:10 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:sq2dnUErCsEd87vS...@bt.com...
>>> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
>>> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
>>
>>
>> WTF did you have a need to crosspost this and even post it here where
>> it does not belong.You are one screwed up nut and a Troll
>
>
> <cough> <clears throat> *I beg your pardon*?!!
>
> I made a post to the groups to which *I* chose to post.
> Nothing to do with you old pal. Got that?
>
> Have *you* signed the petition?
>
> You should - in *my* opinion.
--
the truth of an assertion. Giving or procuring evidence is the process
of using those things that are either presumed to be true, or were
themselves proven via evidence, to demonstrate an assertion's truth.
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 1:36:00 PM1/30/12
to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:12:14 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>500,000 signatures!
>
> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer fucked.
LOL. Where do you get that lunatic notion from, mate?
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>500,000 signatures!
>
> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer fucked.
> You'll
> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:37:37 PM1/30/12
to
Go set up your own server with newsgroups and report back.
news:Xr2dnVwJs4UKS7vS...@bt.com...
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:37:46 PM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:38:22 PM1/30/12
to
Go set up your own server with newsgroups and report back.
~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:38:48 PM1/30/12
to
LOL scum bucket they are both dead.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg6nug$8h8$8...@dont-email.me...
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg6nug$8h8$8...@dont-email.me...
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:41:30 PM1/30/12
to
Go set up your own server with newsgroups and report back.
~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:41:21 PM1/30/12
to
Go set up your own server with newsgroups and report back.
~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 1:42:15 PM1/30/12
to
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
STO0PID CROSS-POST REMOVED. NOT A REPLY.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:17:10 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:sq2dnUErCsEd87vS...@bt.com...
>>> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
>>> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
>>
>>
>> WTF did you have a need to crosspost this and even post it here where
>> it does not belong.You are one screwed up nut and a Troll
>
>
> <cough> <clears throat> *I beg your pardon*?!!
>
> I made a post to the groups to which *I* chose to post.
> Nothing to do with you old pal. Got that?
>
> Have *you* signed the petition?
>
> You should - in *my* opinion.
Top posting drunk mick
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:17:10 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:sq2dnUErCsEd87vS...@bt.com...
>>> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
>>> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
>>
>>
>> WTF did you have a need to crosspost this and even post it here where
>> it does not belong.You are one screwed up nut and a Troll
>
>
> <cough> <clears throat> *I beg your pardon*?!!
>
> I made a post to the groups to which *I* chose to post.
> Nothing to do with you old pal. Got that?
>
> Have *you* signed the petition?
>
> You should - in *my* opinion.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:04:53 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:05:12 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:05:32 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:05:51 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:06:43 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:07:16 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 2:07:40 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark
Jan 30, 2012, 2:13:51 PM1/30/12
to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> <NOT A WORD>
Once was enough, you sto0pid cunt. How many times have you made the same
blank post?
> <NOT A WORD>
Once was enough, you sto0pid cunt. How many times have you made the same
blank post?
FromTheRafters
Jan 30, 2012, 3:01:04 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
Nothing.
Please stop with the blank posts.
Nothing.
Please stop with the blank posts.
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 3:11:30 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 3:14:46 PM1/30/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> <NOT A WORD>
>
> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> <NOT A WORD>
>
> blank post?
Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
FromTheRafters
Jan 30, 2012, 3:15:35 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ wrote:
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> Nothing.
>>
>> Please stop with the blank posts.
>
> Have you taken any action to stop Bulltinkle?
>
I used my filter, and I'm about to use it again.
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> Nothing.
>>
>> Please stop with the blank posts.
>
> Have you taken any action to stop Bulltinkle?
>
SeaNymph
Jan 30, 2012, 3:32:28 PM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 4:04:48 PM1/30/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 4:05:29 PM1/30/12
to
Go set up your own server with newsgroups and report back.
Also, ask yourself How can I be sure I am the daddy of my wife's 2 children?
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 4:05:46 PM1/30/12
to
Go set up your own server with newsgroups and report back.
Bullwinkle.
Jan 30, 2012, 4:11:25 PM1/30/12
to
kelly
Jan 30, 2012, 5:33:13 PM1/30/12
to
On Jan 30, 11:18 am, ~BD~ <~...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
> corporate powers, it would set up a shadowy new anti-counterfeiting body
> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
> to allow private interests to police everything that we do online and
> impose massive penalties -- even prison sentences -- against people they
> say have harmed their business.
>
> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
> 500,000 signatures!
>
> http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?tta
> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
> 500,000 signatures!
>
>
> --
> Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
> for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
> do unto you."
I think there are too many hackers out there to let this
> --
> Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
> for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
> do unto you."
happen...without retaliation. After all, it would be dictatorial. :-)
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 6:01:02 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 6:01:24 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 6:02:11 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 6:07:40 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 6:47:08 PM1/30/12
to
Kulin Remailer
Jan 30, 2012, 7:47:34 PM1/30/12
to
In article <5bcdi7111ecjupg3n...@Osama-is-dead.net>
G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
skipped
> it won't take too much for the citizens to
> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
Threat reported to Homeland Security Site
G. Morgan <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
skipped
> it won't take too much for the citizens to
> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
Threat reported to Homeland Security Site
G. Morgan
Jan 30, 2012, 8:03:46 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~
Jan 30, 2012, 8:12:47 PM1/30/12
to
Best to be straight, honest and true.
IMO
Dustin
Jan 30, 2012, 10:53:20 PM1/30/12
to
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>
>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
>> blank post?
>
> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>
> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
displeasure.
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by,
and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>
>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
>> blank post?
>
> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>
> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
displeasure.
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by,
and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 4:07:37 AM1/31/12
to
Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>
>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
>>> blank post?
>>
>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>
>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>
> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
> displeasure.
That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>
>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
>>> blank post?
>>
>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>
>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>
> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
> displeasure.
http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
Nor in accord with your word.
Better that you took action to eliminate Bullwinkle's activities, in my
opinion.
Btw, I expect you remember this message by Andy Walker
Message-ID: <nep9q1psest1l50gk...@4ax.com>
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.spyware/msg/355162cc664b963?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect
I found the whole thread interesting.
Enjoy your day! :-)
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:30:55 AM1/31/12
to
50/50 chance you are not the daddy of your wife's two children.
If you are man enough ask you who pleased her all those nights you were not
home,
She will now tell you Bullwinkle if you ask.
Back in the day it was some good shit to!
That was the only reason I stayed pals with a lying scum bag like you.
news:p8adnef78NezvLrS...@bt.com...
If you are man enough ask you who pleased her all those nights you were not
home,
She will now tell you Bullwinkle if you ask.
Back in the day it was some good shit to!
That was the only reason I stayed pals with a lying scum bag like you.
news:p8adnef78NezvLrS...@bt.com...
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:31:47 AM1/31/12
to
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:40:38 AM1/31/12
to
When are you going to do that?
You never have in the last 20 years
news:792dnVg7FION3brS...@bt.com...
You never have in the last 20 years
news:792dnVg7FION3brS...@bt.com...
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 5:51:01 AM1/31/12
to
What ever happened to your law suit against the 'remailer' jenn basher?
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:i9hei7dn59bpnk6ut...@Osama-is-dead.net...
>>> Threat reported to Homeland Security Site
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I'm sure they will get right on that.
>
>*They* don't like 'bad guys' any more than I do!
>
>Best to be straight, honest and true.
Agreed, maybe you should adhere to that principle too.
I have nothing to hide, I just bought a rifle last week and passed the
background check. The FBI checks my criminal history regularly due to
being in the security business.
You're an admitted copyright infringer, most recent crime was last week.
You're also a stalker, and the UK is much more stringent when it comes
to that activity.
I got a ticket for making an illegal U-turn about 7 years ago though, so
I guess that makes me "bad" in your book.
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:i9hei7dn59bpnk6ut...@Osama-is-dead.net...
~BD~ wrote:
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>
>>> In article<5bcdi7111ecjupg3n...@Osama-is-dead.net>
>>> G. Morgan<seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>> skipped
>>>
>>>> it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
[ moved newsgroups]
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>
>>> In article<5bcdi7111ecjupg3n...@Osama-is-dead.net>
>>> G. Morgan<seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>> skipped
>>>
>>>> it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>> Threat reported to Homeland Security Site
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I'm sure they will get right on that.
>
>*They* don't like 'bad guys' any more than I do!
>
>Best to be straight, honest and true.
I have nothing to hide, I just bought a rifle last week and passed the
background check. The FBI checks my criminal history regularly due to
being in the security business.
You're an admitted copyright infringer, most recent crime was last week.
You're also a stalker, and the UK is much more stringent when it comes
to that activity.
I got a ticket for making an illegal U-turn about 7 years ago though, so
I guess that makes me "bad" in your book.
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 6:01:45 AM1/31/12
to
> What ever happened to your law suit against the 'remailer' jenn basher?
Bullwinkle.
Jan 31, 2012, 6:35:50 AM1/31/12
to
JohnR
Jan 31, 2012, 10:11:49 AM1/31/12
to
On 30/01/2012 16:43, G. Morgan wrote:
> JohnR wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2012 15:12, G. Morgan wrote:
>>> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
>>> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
>>>
>>> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
>>> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
>>> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
>>> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
>>> touching it (especially in an election year).
>>>
>>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
>> partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!
>>
>> When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
>> free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
>> default terrorists.
>
> Supposedly, it's your duty as an American to point out corruption. Our
> framers of the Union put a clause in the Constitution to protect against
> a rogue government.
>
> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
> day the US as we know it is no more.
>
Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.
It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.
> JohnR wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2012 15:12, G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>>> 500,000 signatures!
>>>
>>> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer fucked. You'll
>>>
>>>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>>> 500,000 signatures!
>>>
>>> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
>>> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
>>>
>>> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
>>> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
>>> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
>>> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
>>> touching it (especially in an election year).
>>>
>>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>>
>> Why do you think the power broker crooks weaselled NDAA onto the
>>>
>> statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
>> partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!
>>
>> When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
>> free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
>> default terrorists.
>
> Supposedly, it's your duty as an American to point out corruption. Our
> framers of the Union put a clause in the Constitution to protect against
> a rogue government.
>
> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
> day the US as we know it is no more.
>
Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.
It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.
G. Morgan
Jan 31, 2012, 1:12:28 PM1/31/12
to
JohnR wrote:
>> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
>> day the US as we know it is no more.
>>
>Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
>just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
>you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.
>
>It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.
Well, you can love your country and still hate its current Government.
>> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
>> day the US as we know it is no more.
>>
>Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
>just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
>you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.
>
>It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.
Our Constitution is being tested, in both meanings of the word.
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 5:10:49 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>
>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>
>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>
>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>
> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
> displeasure.
LOL.
> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>
>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>
>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>
>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>
> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
> displeasure.
How ya doin', Dustin?
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 5:18:39 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour, cunt. If
> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and send
them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
"Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages)"
Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing, you sto0pid
cunt. I told you a day or two ago.
~BD~
Jan 31, 2012, 5:36:20 PM1/31/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
>> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
>
> That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour. If
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
>> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
>
> someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and send
> them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
> relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
>
> "Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages)"
>
> Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing. I told you a day or two ago.
> them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
> relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
>
> "Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages)"
>
>
>
>
@ Aardvark
Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
so. He has no honour.
May I suggest that if *you* feel strongly about this, *YOU*, in the best
interest of everyone posting on Usenet, collect all the headers of all
my 'SPAM' posts and send them with an abuse report to BT.
It shouldn't take you too long. Are you game?
I'm most interested to see if BT would, actually, dump a loyal customer
for my terrible misdemeanour. It certainly bothers me not one jot!
Peter Foldes
Jan 31, 2012, 5:57:50 PM1/31/12
to
*****************Crossposting Removed*****************************
Why in the fucking hell did you again add crossposting you friggin Troll
Why in the fucking hell did you again add crossposting you friggin Troll
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 6:06:12 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
>>> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
>>
>> That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour. If
>> someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and
>> send them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
>> relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
>>
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%
29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
>>
>> "Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
>> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar
>> messages)"
>>
>> Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing. I told
>> you a day or two ago.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> @ Aardvark
>
> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>
Of course I did, cunt.
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
>>> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
>>
>> That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour. If
>> someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and
>> send them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
>> relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
>>
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%
29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
>>
>> "Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
>> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar
>> messages)"
>>
>> Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing. I told
>> you a day or two ago.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> @ Aardvark
>
> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>
> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
> number (again!)
Don't come crying to me.
> when he's already given his word that he would not do
> so. He has no honour.
>
> May I suggest that if *you* feel strongly about this, *YOU*, in the best
> interest of everyone posting on Usenet, collect all the headers of all
> my 'SPAM' posts and send them with an abuse report to BT.
>
> It shouldn't take you too long. Are you game?
>
> I'm most interested to see if BT would, actually, dump a loyal customer
> for my terrible misdemeanour.
> It certainly bothers me not one jot!
Peter Foldes
Jan 31, 2012, 6:17:12 PM1/31/12
to
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9s54$el2$1...@dont-email.me...
Aardvark
Watch his crossposting. He added uk.legal which I see that you removed.
JS
news:jg9s54$el2$1...@dont-email.me...
Aardvark
Watch his crossposting. He added uk.legal which I see that you removed.
JS
FromTheRafters
Jan 31, 2012, 6:17:58 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>
> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
> number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
> so. He has no honour.
cite a MID?
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 6:19:52 PM1/31/12
to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:17:12 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:jg9s54$el2$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> Aardvark
>
> Watch his crossposting.
I do try to do that, sometimes I forget to check.
> "Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:jg9s54$el2$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> Aardvark
>
> Watch his crossposting.
> He added uk.legal which I see that you removed.
he, therefore it was superfluous.
Dustin
Jan 31, 2012, 7:05:14 PM1/31/12
to
Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in
news:jg9ot9$eb1$5...@dont-email.me:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>>
>>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>>
>>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>>
>>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while
>>> he/she/it persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>>
>> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
>> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
>> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice
>> their displeasure.
>
> LOL.
>
> How ya doin', Dustin?
>
>
>
im alive. :)
news:jg9ot9$eb1$5...@dont-email.me:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>>
>>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>>
>>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>>
>>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while
>>> he/she/it persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>>
>> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
>> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
>> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice
>> their displeasure.
>
> LOL.
>
> How ya doin', Dustin?
>
>
>
Aardvark
Jan 31, 2012, 7:07:20 PM1/31/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:05:14 +0000, Dustin wrote:
> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in
> news:jg9ot9$eb1$5...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>>>
>>>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>>>
>>>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>>>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>>>
>>> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
>>> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
>>> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice
>>> their displeasure.
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> How ya doin', Dustin?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> im alive. :)
Well, anything above that is whipped cream on the cherries.
> Aardvark <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in
> news:jg9ot9$eb1$5...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vS...@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>>>
>>>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>>>
>>>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>>>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>>>
>>> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
>>> ab...@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
>>> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice
>>> their displeasure.
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> How ya doin', Dustin?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> im alive. :)
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 5:28:33 AM2/1/12
to
Of course not, you always are all mouth and no action
when it come to doing something straight up.
That is why bomb building suits you, run and hide.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9s54$el2$1...@dont-email.me...
when it come to doing something straight up.
That is why bomb building suits you, run and hide.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9s54$el2$1...@dont-email.me...
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 5:29:27 AM2/1/12
to
Morgan said he was going to get your BT account closed.
why are you still here??
news:mfydnZ7Udcx58bXS...@bt.com...
why are you still here??
news:mfydnZ7Udcx58bXS...@bt.com...
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 5:35:55 AM2/1/12
to
So mister bomber of UK troops, why don't you do just that.
Like bd you always want somone else to carry the water.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9pbv$eb1$6...@dont-email.me...
Like bd you always want somone else to carry the water.
"Aardvark" <aard...@youllnever.know> wrote in message
~BD~
Feb 1, 2012, 8:20:54 AM2/1/12
to
yet found the MID.
Aardvark
Feb 1, 2012, 9:04:41 AM2/1/12
to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:20:54 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>>>
>>> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
>>> number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
>>> so. He has no honour.
>>
>> I don't recall Dustin promising not to threaten to do anything, could
>> you cite a MID?
>
> He *did* say he would not *drop my docs* as he puts it - but I've not
> yet found the MID.
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>>>
>>> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
>>> number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
>>> so. He has no honour.
>>
>> I don't recall Dustin promising not to threaten to do anything, could
>> you cite a MID?
>
> He *did* say he would not *drop my docs* as he puts it - but I've not
> yet found the MID.
1111!!!!111!!!111!!!!111!!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~BD~
Feb 1, 2012, 9:08:01 AM2/1/12
to
Aardvark wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:20:54 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>>>>
>>>> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
>>>> number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
>>>> so. He has no honour.
>>>
>>> I don't recall Dustin promising not to threaten to do anything, could
>>> you cite a MID?
>>
>> He *did* say he would not *drop my docs* as he puts it - but I've not
>> yet found the MID.
>
> WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 1111!!!!111!!!111!!!!111!!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh dear. Still no work?
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:20:54 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>>>>
>>>> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
>>>> number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
>>>> so. He has no honour.
>>>
>>> I don't recall Dustin promising not to threaten to do anything, could
>>> you cite a MID?
>>
>> He *did* say he would not *drop my docs* as he puts it - but I've not
>> yet found the MID.
>
> WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 1111!!!!111!!!111!!!!111!!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~BD~
Feb 1, 2012, 9:39:42 AM2/1/12
to
FromTheRafters wrote:
[...]
>
> I don't recall Dustin promising *not to threaten* to do anything, could you
> cite a MID?
OK - you win! :-P
[...]
>
> I don't recall Dustin promising *not to threaten* to do anything, could you
> cite a MID?
OK - you win! :-P
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 10:02:05 AM2/1/12
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:Dt2dnVp4Uffcs73S...@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>
Good job I didn't steal it then!
It's 'open source' here on Usenet!
bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DS...@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.
OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."
bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on
I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.
Bullwinkle.
Feb 1, 2012, 10:02:34 AM2/1/12
to
Why are you still here?
morgan said he was gonna get your account closed
morgan said he was gonna get your account closed
0 new messages