Most all remailer addresses are listed in...

[Anonymous]

zen.spamhaus.org

[Anonymous]

Anonymous <anon...@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:

>zen.spamhaus.org

Remops themselves use spamhouse to prevent Tor users from delivering
their Mixmaster packets.

| 10:25:28.521 0 SMTP State: Sending chunk 1 of 1 from 'inco...@google.com' to 'mixm...@remailer.paranoici.org', server 'remailer.paranoici.org', port 587 ...
...
| 10:25:32.477 0 SMTP Error: Service unavailable; Client host [173.254.216.66] blocked using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/173.254.216.66: 250 - Ok

http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=e93f05c9a7112544a2f132cbb7f6701877140f2a

Nonsense across the board.

[Anonymous]

In article <14aed8e347e64b84...@remailer.paranoici.org>

Allpingers.net says remailer anon / anonusa.net - mail 587: yes, but I
get

: Connection Closed Gracefully.: 550 - SMTP AUTH is required for message submission on port 587

The same with kreti / mail.hoi-polloi.org on port 587:

: 530 5.7.0 Authentication required

Why that?

[Anonymous Remailer (austria)]

In article <1c4bef9a30a454f8...@hoi-polloi.org>

Because YOU are no permitted to use those ports.

Use the correct port number, Luke.

[Cornelis Tromp]

>
> In article <14aed8e347e64b84...@remailer.paranoici.org>
> Anonymous <nob...@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Anonymous <anon...@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>>
>>> zen.spamhaus.org
>>
>> Remops themselves use spamhouse to prevent Tor users from delivering
>> their Mixmaster packets.
>>
>>> 10:25:28.521 0 SMTP State: Sending chunk 1 of 1 from 'inco...@google.com' to 'mixm...@remailer.paranoici.org', server 'remailer.paranoici.org', port 587 ... ...
>>> 10:25:32.477 0 SMTP Error: Service unavailable; Client host 173.254.216.66 blocked using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/173.254.216.66: 250 - Ok
>>

>> http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.phpFP=e93f05c9a7112544a2f132cbb7f6701877140f2a

>>
>> Nonsense across the board.
>
>
> Allpingers.net says remailer anon / anonusa.net - mail 587: yes, but I
> get
>
>
>> Connection Closed Gracefully.: 550 - SMTP AUTH is required for message submission on port 587
>
> The same with kreti / mail.hoi-polloi.org on port 587:
>
>
>> 530 5.7.0 Authentication required
>
> Why that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Need to ask Richard about that. It is his scripts that
find the information found in the allpingers.net page.
The authentication restrictions obviously lie with kreti
and anon.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jmAK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
4096R 7295B3BB 2015-02-28 ad...@allpingers.net
3BA4 0ACD 2C3D 7047 993E AE79 DD63 8B2B 7295 B3BB

[Cornelis Tromp]

"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixm...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:

>In article <1c4bef9a30a454f8...@hoi-polloi.org>
>Anonymous <anon...@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>>
>> In article <14aed8e347e64b84...@remailer.paranoici.org>
>> Anonymous <nob...@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Anonymous <anon...@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > >zen.spamhaus.org
>> >
>> > Remops themselves use spamhouse to prevent Tor users from delivering
>> > their Mixmaster packets.
>> >
>> > | 10:25:28.521 0 SMTP State: Sending chunk 1 of 1 from 'inco...@google.com' to 'mixm...@remailer.paranoici.org', server 'remailer.paranoici.org', port 587 ...
>> > ...
>> > | 10:25:32.477 0 SMTP Error: Service unavailable; Client host [173.254.216.66] blocked using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/173.254.216.66: 250 - Ok
>> >
>> > http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=e93f05c9a7112544a2f132cbb7f6701877140f2a
>> >
>> > Nonsense across the board.
>>
>>
>> Allpingers.net says remailer anon / anonusa.net - mail 587: yes, but I
>> get
>>
>> : Connection Closed Gracefully.: 550 - SMTP AUTH is required for message submission on port 587

>> Why that?
>
>Because YOU are no permitted to use those ports.
>
>Use the correct port number, Luke.

Which were?

Port 25?

: 550 - "JunkMail rejected - (yahoo.com) [185.100.86.167]:24991 is in an RBL on|rbl.websitewelcome.com, see Blocked - see|http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=185.100.86.167"
: 550 - "JunkMail rejected - vps1243401.vs.webtropia-customer.com (gmail.com)|[85.114.142.232]:56906 is in an RBL on rbl.websitewelcome.com, see Blocked|- see http://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/85.114.142.232/32"
: 550 - "JunkMail rejected - server1.koljasagorski.de (facebook.com)|[213.202.252.166]:50224 is in an RBL on rbl.websitewelcome.com, see Blocked|- see http://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/213.202.252.166/32"

Port 465?

: 550 - "JunkMail rejected - h-133-149.a2.corp.bahnhof.no (hotmail.co.uk)|[37.123.133.149]:47190 is in an RBL on rbl.websitewelcome.com, see Blocked|- see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=37.123.133.149"
: 550 - "JunkMail rejected - vps1243401.vs.webtropia-customer.com (google.com)|[85.114.142.232]:48512 is in an RBL on rbl.websitewelcome.com, see Blocked|- see http://psbl.surriel.com/listing?ip=85.114.142.232"

Port 2525?

: 650 NOTICE Your application (using socks5 to port 2525) instructed Tor to take care of the DNS resolution itself if necessary. This is good.
: 650 INFO connection_ap_process_end_not_open(): Edge got end (connection refused) before we're connected. Marking for close.

Anonymity services blocking anonymous connections.
What's going round in their heads?

[Anonymous]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous <nob...@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:

>Anonymous <anon...@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>
>>zen.spamhaus.org
>
>Remops themselves use spamhouse to prevent Tor users from delivering
>their Mixmaster packets.

Nothing new about that, dizum has been doing it for many years.

[Nomen Nescio]

In article <a4e3a2d30ea0b53f...@anon.holland.remailer.nl>,

Cornelis Tromp <nob...@holland.remailer.nl> wrote:

> Need to ask Richard about that. It is his scripts that
> find the information found in the allpingers.net page.
> The authentication restrictions obviously lie with kreti
> and anon.

To get realistic results the script should try to transmit Mixmaster
packets through Tor connections.

[Nomen Nescio]

Cornelis Tromp <nob...@holland.remailer.nl> wrote:

> Anonymity services blocking anonymous connections.
> What's going round in their heads?

I've been asking that myself. The reasons they give show a complete lack of
understanding for the workings of mail and remailers.

anon is a useless remailer with all that blocking and log-obsession going
on.

[Nathan Hale]

No delivery problems at all with smtp.dizum.com on port 25 through Tor.

Alex, tell these DIYers how to configure an SMTP service correctly.

[Anonymous]

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:00:52 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:

>Cornelis Tromp <nob...@holland.remailer.nl> wrote:
>
>> Anonymity services blocking anonymous connections.
>> What's going round in their heads?
>
>I've been asking that myself. The reasons they give show a complete lack of
>understanding for the workings of mail and remailers.

You seem to be assuming that all the email traffic landing on a remailer's MX must be remailer messages. This is not necessarily the
case and several remops use the same MX for other purposes besides running a remailer.

The remop who has been doing this stuff continuously and far longer than any other, (since 1994 by my count) and who BTW has a very
complete understanding of mail and remailers, protects his mail server by using block lists.

I am sure he knows that remailer messages coming in from IPs identified by these block lists as significant SPAM sources is being
rejected. But it's his server, he runs it as he sees fit, and this level of collateral damage seems to be acceptable - to him.

How do you run your remailer and its associated MX?

[Anonymous]

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:52:28 +0000 (GMT), Nathan Hale <nob...@remailer.org.uk> wrote:

>Anonymous wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous <nob...@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Anonymous <anon...@hoi-polloi.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>zen.spamhaus.org
>>>
>>>Remops themselves use spamhouse to prevent Tor users from delivering
>>>their Mixmaster packets.
>>
>>Nothing new about that, dizum has been doing it for many years.
>
>No delivery problems at all with smtp.dizum.com on port 25 through Tor.

Must be a fairly recent change. I gave up on that route back in 2012. See:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.privacy.anon-server/stray$20cat$20That$27s$20a$20TOR$20exit$20node%7Csort:relevance/alt.privacy.anon-server/YrEzjGZCcoc/J1LjiPPlRiwJ

(Note the complaints about TOR exit nodes being blocked and Alex's explanation.)

>Alex, tell these DIYers how to configure an SMTP service correctly.

LOL.

[Anonymous]

In article <d2d9836c8f220043...@remailer.org.uk>

I don't have any delivery problems, but I use onion instead of
trying to use a legacy smtp service that is no longer freely
available in most parts of the Internet because of abuse.

There is no fucking way I'd run an open SMTP server on the
modern Internet.

[Anonymous]

It doesn't have to be an open SMTP server. It only needs to accept messages for the remailer address.

[Fakey's Dog Whistle Holder Emeritus]

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:45:53 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Anonymous"
determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
decided to freely share it with us in
<2kr85ct711e7los7o...@news.stray.cat.edu>:

perhaps you don't understand the concept of multi-hosting. the SMTP server might be accepting messages for multiple domains, all with different valid users.

HTH

--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

ga�ble
'gab?l/
noun
the part of a wall that encloses the end of a pitched roof.
a wall topped with a gable.
noun: gable end; plural noun: gable ends
a gable-shaped canopy over a window or door.

http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/photos/0,,1213138,00.html
Gable
Gabled roofs are the kind young children typically draw. They have two
sloping sides that come together at a ridge, creating end walls with a
*triangular extension*, called a gable, at the top. The house shown here
has two gable roofs and two dormers, each with gable roofs of their own.
The slant, or pitch, of the gables varies, an inconsistency that many
builders try to avoid.

LOL

-

Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Beaten by the queen of Pembroke each time
Have you heard about the lotusLoser
He's a loser, but he still keeps on tryin'

Oohoohooh oooh

Sit down, take a look at yourself
Don't you want to be somebody
Someday somebody's gonna see inside
You have to face up, you can't run and hide

Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Beaten by the queen of Pembroke each time
Have you heard about the lotusLoser
He's a loser, but he still keeps on tryin'

Unlucky in love, least that's what they say
He lost his head and he gabled his heart away
He still keeps posting though there's nothing left
Staked his heart and lost, now he has to pay the cost

Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Beaten by the queen of Pembroke each time
Have you heard about the lotusLoser
He's a loser, but he still keeps on cryin'

"Fag. LOL", he smiles and says
Though this RMS is driving him crazy
He don't show what goes on in his head
But if you watch very close you'll see it all

Sit down, take a look at yourself
Don't you want to be somebody
Someday somebody's gonna see inside
You have to face up, you can't run and hide

Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Beaten by the queen of Pembroke each time
Have you heard about the lotusLoser
He's a loser, but he still keeps on cryin'

Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Have you heard about the lotusLoser
Now tell me have you heard about the lotusLoser

-

LOL

well i guess if we went to:

http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/

and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b96...@dizum.com>

<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>

I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."

it would say "definitely not green", right???

http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png

D'OH!!!!

*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*

-

"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the stock market go even lower."

so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?

funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the government stepping in to save the stock market.

"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view and several heterodox points of view.

First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.

Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation, causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow to owe ever more in real terms."

wait? what? no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the government for everything mentioned?

odd, that. eh, lotusLoser?

-

the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d3972...@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between �hot� wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180� apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb...@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

/a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); // snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: <db672705e57e4932...@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision( sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)* float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e328...@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25 volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time. That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8...@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" << t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b76...@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FN...@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "ro...@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority � as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9...@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

[Nomen Nescio]

Fakey's Dog Whistle Holder Emeritus <ro...@127.0.0.1> wrote:

> perhaps you don't understand the concept of multi-hosting.

I do.

> the SMTP server might be accepting messages for multiple domains, all
> with different valid users.

And all can be configured differently. Mail for mixmaster@domain2 can be
unfiltered while joe@domain1 rejects all mail from outside his home town.

[Anonymous Remailer (austria)]

In article <b57a3d020217306b...@dizum.com>

works for the rest of us. what's your problem?

[Anonymous]

In article <b57a3d020217306b...@dizum.com>
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>

what the name of your remailer?

[Anon]

I am not blocking anything. My service provider (HostGator) might be but I am not.

[Jeremy Bentham]

In article <38be67966986f8e8...@hoi-polloi.org>

Trolls don't run remailers, they just whine about them.

[Jeremy Bentham]

Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:

>Fakey's Dog Whistle Holder Emeritus <ro...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> perhaps you don't understand the concept of multi-hosting.
>
>I do.
>
>> the SMTP server might be accepting messages for multiple domains, all
>> with different valid users.
>
>And all can be configured differently. Mail for mixmaster@domain2 can be
>unfiltered

or body filtered for Mixmaster packet format

[Anonymous]

I also remember problems with dizum which now have gone.
Try it and report your results.

[Anonymous]

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 23:08:17 +0100 (CET), Jeremy Bentham <nob...@anemone.mooo.com> wrote:

>or body filtered for Mixmaster packet format

Mixmaster itself is capable of filtering non-remailer messages. See the MAILBOX remailer configuration variable in the man page.

[Jeremy Bentham]

No RBL filter in your Postfix / Postscreen config file
/etc/postfix/main.cf (reject_rbl_client / postscreen_dnsbl_sites)?

No SpamAssassin DNSBL plugin / rule in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre /
v310.pre (loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL / DNSEval)?

[Anon]

On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 6:08:29 PM UTC-6, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

None of those. If they are there, it's because Ubuntu put them there, but I doubt that it did; if it is there, it's whatever the default setup is. I did not change it, assuming, of course, that it is there in the first place.

As for SpamAssassin, I don't use it and see no reason to, as I am a middle-only relay.

[Nomen Nescio]

In article <cb3950b8-55d4-4019...@googlegroups.com> Anon

<donald....@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 6:08:29 PM UTC-6, Jeremy Bentham wrote:

>> >I am not blocking anything. My service provider (HostGator) might be but I am not.
>>
>> No RBL filter in your Postfix / Postscreen config file
>> /etc/postfix/main.cf (reject_rbl_client / postscreen_dnsbl_sites)?

>None of those. If they are there, it's because Ubuntu put them there, but I doubt that it did; if it is there, it's whatever the default setup is. I did not change it, assuming, of course, that it is there in the first place.

It may be there without your intervention. So are there RBL rules in
your postfix config file or not? Please show us the contents of its
smtpd_client_restrictions section ("postconf -n").

[Anon]

On Sunday, December 18, 2016 at 6:59:21 AM UTC-6, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> In article <cb3950b8-55d4-4019...@googlegroups.com> Anon

Looks pretty standard:

smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination
smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated defer_unauth_destination

[Nomen Nescio]

You're right. Thanks for posting these data.
Time to ask HostGator what's going on?

[Anon]

On Monday, December 19, 2016 at 6:21:04 PM UTC-6, Nomen Nescio wrote:

Per this:

http://mixmin.net/tls/

you should be able to connect to HostGator. If that does not work, sending email via another gateway should work. I did just go into my control panel at HostGator and disabled a default spam filter; hopefully, that will help things out.

[Anonymous]

Anon <donald....@gmail.com> wrote:

>Per this:
>
>http://mixmin.net/tls/
>
>you should be able to connect to HostGator.

Connext yes, send no.

> If that does not work, sending email via another gateway should work. I did just go into my control panel at HostGator and disabled a default spam filter; hopefully, that will help things out.

| 09:27:34.469 0 SMTP State: Sending chunk 1 of 1 from 'Anonymous <anon...@facebook.com>' to 'an...@anonusa.net', server 'anonusa.net', port 25 ...
...
| 09:27:41.819 0 SMTP Error: Connection Closed Gracefully.: 550 - "JunkMail rejected - (facebook.com) [89.144.12.15]:37204 is in an RBL on|rbl.websitewelcome.com, see Blocked - see|http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=89.144.12.15"