enough is too much
tired of the bitching
care.
how about everybody lay off of frog and get down to doing something
important... like get another 50 people to decide they're willing to run a
remailer?!?
in care you havent noticed, a network of 45 is pretty tiny and could fall
apart easily.. it really does need to double, preferably triple, in size
and soon at that.
tired of the bitching
Tarapia Tapioco
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, An Metet <anm...@freedom.gmsociety.org> wrote:
>NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
>No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>On 14 Sep 2003, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (tired of the
>Knock yourself out. Have at it. Let us know when your ready to start taking
>the abuse.
Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBP2TV04DgT488d3zFAQGwUAf/Umxid3/+DamkNbQbQkFVNHsif7AK9/aY
Yqa7qeyqE36fuNeB8rXJDNiO2Osx5bOYUA9mBq6n0CBV33Wti1Mu+vRucNHfnIye
vCeghfiH5ZLHZR8GHTKAOwVqgLcxCXEYxA4Z3yWcgxtdd01zmWK/DWo6qF113t5f
mjaBBt749QCqLCXIPPy7L+EbCFjwoeWnYK9c2GtOQxH2YFg4bOzMwtl2gP/PrsZS
M57KNygQAC1tO5odEGufUVhv27HWuZRU7sHmVlEMqwnKrPW2mIhoSfxGlbtOZYR2
YvrYahfbls2O4LyIN3IcSMnNPxjyNpYOPIisfrf70rqHyIoUq2zb+A==
=SOmA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tarapia Tapioco
>NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
>No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>On 14 Sep 2003, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (tired of the
>bitching) wrote:
Can't we all just get along
>ok.. i'm sure this will win me the troll of the month award, but i dont
>care.
>how about everybody lay off of frog and get down to doing something
>important... like get another 50 people to decide they're willing to run a
>remailer?!?
I'm gonna give you some competition for that troll of the year award.
I agree, we need more RELIABLE remailers. Maybe if everyone put 1/2 the
effort they put into bitching at each other into keeping the remailers
up and running things would be a lot better.
At one time I had considered running a remailer myself, but after
seeing the kindergarten antics here why would anyone want to subject
himself to the abuse I see here every day?
I don't know if frog is doing anything you guys say he is. If he is
then why not treat him like we treat all the trolls in other ngs?
Ignore him.
IMHO it appears that he is doing more than any of the rest of you to
keep the network running. Why don't we all grow up and get down to
the business of running the network, then maybe more people would be
willing to spend the time learning to do this as well.
Anonymous
>>>apart easily.. it really does need to double, preferably triple, in size
>>>and soon at that.
>>
>>Knock yourself out. Have at it. Let us know when your ready to start taking
>>the abuse.
>
>Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
>Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: N/A
>
>iQEVAwUBP2TV04DgT488d3zFAQGwUAf/Umxid3/+DamkNbQbQkFVNHsif7AK9/aY
>Yqa7qeyqE36fuNeB8rXJDNiO2Osx5bOYUA9mBq6n0CBV33Wti1Mu+vRucNHfnIye
>vCeghfiH5ZLHZR8GHTKAOwVqgLcxCXEYxA4Z3yWcgxtdd01zmWK/DWo6qF113t5f
>mjaBBt749QCqLCXIPPy7L+EbCFjwoeWnYK9c2GtOQxH2YFg4bOzMwtl2gP/PrsZS
>M57KNygQAC1tO5odEGufUVhv27HWuZRU7sHmVlEMqwnKrPW2mIhoSfxGlbtOZYR2
>YvrYahfbls2O4LyIN3IcSMnNPxjyNpYOPIisfrf70rqHyIoUq2zb+A==
>=SOmA
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
International version - not for use in the USA. Does not use RSAREF.
Current time: 2003/09/16 23:26 GMT
File has signature. Public key is required to check signature.
Good signature from user "Frog-Admin".
Signature made 2003/09/14 20:56 GMT using 2048-bit key, key ID 3C777CC5
Looks like Frog-Admin started talking about himself in the third person
again...
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
privacy.at Anonymous Remailer
In article <6G3GSQVI3787...@Gilgamesh-frog.org>
Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Can't we all just get along) wrote:
>
> tired of the bitching wrote...
>
> >ok.. i'm sure this will win me the troll of the month award, but i dont
> >care.
> IMHO it appears that he [Frog] is doing more than any of the rest of you to
> keep the network running.
Like what? Seriously.
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
Anonymous <Bigapple...@Optonline.Net> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, An Metet <anm...@freedom.gmsociety.org> wrote:
>On 14 Sep 2003, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (tired of the
>bitching) wrote:
>>ok.. i'm sure this will win me the troll of the month award, but i dont
>>care.
Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
***[9/16/2003 6:13:40 PM] END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
>
> International version - not for use in the USA. Does not use RSAREF.
> Current time: 2003/09/16 23:26 GMT
>
> File has signature. Public key is required to check signature.
>
> Good signature from user "Frog-Admin".
> Signature made 2003/09/14 20:56 GMT using 2048-bit key, key ID 3C777CC5
>
>
> Looks like Frog-Admin started talking about himself in the third person
> again...
Good grief, you're right. I suppose that falls into the "I'm Royalty so I
get to do that" category.
FUD-Admin
check the PGP signature on it. It's Frog-Admin. He posted "anon" but forgot to
remove his real PGP key from the "Sign:" box in JBN, so he signed his "troll" post.
Now let's hear all the Frog apologist morons line up to tell us how the "troll" not
only "imitates" Frog-Admin's "style," but also "imitates" his PGP signature.
From: Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <ab...@ntani.firenze.linux.it>.
Subject: Re: enough is too much
Organization: ><((((º> Happy Lobster & Partners <°))))><
X-Comment: In Case of Emergency, Flush the Toilet
X-Mailer: JackB.Nymble Version 2.1
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
References: <3HYB4M7537...@Gilgamesh-frog.org> <de52fb76de9822eb...@anonymous.poster>
Message-ID: <0eea20aab54c4bfa...@firenze.linux.it>
Date: 15 Sep 2003 00:36:10 +0200
Lines: 38
X-Mail2News-Contact: http://80.65.224.85/
Path: nwrddc01.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!chi1.webusenet.com!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!Gilgamesh-frogadmin.yi.org!not-for-mail
Xref: cyclone1.gnilink.net alt.privacy.anon-server:210399
X-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:37:22 EDT (nwrddc01.gnilink.net)
FUD-Admin
check the PGP signature on it. It's Frog-Admin. He posted "anon" but forgot to
remove his real PGP key from the "Sign:" box in JBN, so he signed his "troll" post.
Now let's hear all the Frog apologist morons line up to tell us how the "troll" not
only "imitates" Frog-Admin's "style," but also "imitates" his PGP signature.
From: Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <ab...@ntani.firenze.linux.it>.
Subject: Re: enough is too much
Organization: ><((((º> Happy Lobster & Partners <°))))><
X-Comment: In Case of Emergency, Flush the Toilet
X-Mailer: JackB.Nymble Version 2.1
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
References: <3HYB4M7537...@Gilgamesh-frog.org> <de52fb76de9822eb...@anonymous.poster>
Message-ID: <0eea20aab54c4bfa...@firenze.linux.it>
Date: 15 Sep 2003 00:36:10 +0200
Lines: 38
X-Mail2News-Contact: http://80.65.224.85/
Path: nwrddc01.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!chi1.webusenet.com!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!Gilgamesh-frogadmin.yi.org!not-for-mail
Xref: cyclone1.gnilink.net alt.privacy.anon-server:210399
X-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:37:22 EDT (nwrddc01.gnilink.net)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Frog-Admin
On 15 Sep 2003, Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
>Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
Sorry for forgetting the quotes in my PGP-signed message and not mentioning my sources.
"Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin"
is a quote from Farout-Admin (2001/01)
in a mail exchange between me (Frog-Admin), Farout-Admin and ComputerCryptology
Along with this one
"Frog-Admin is a primary target. Probably _the_ target for many
anti-remailer/privacy people. An organized attack, likely. By a TLA or
something, I doubt it. In the troll world, being able to claim "spnak" on
Frog-Admin would be a feather in ones cap. The anti-remailer crowd would
like nothing better than to discredit a very popular remailer and cause
in-fighting between other operators."
"Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird"
is a quote from an anonymous private mail (2001/03)
about the activities of the anti_Frog troll at the time.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBP2goEIDgT488d3zFAQH10AgAwJOgD4sp8Vs802188pvbL+YneJhoZpsg
kDijhHeuTeifGlVRX2S/Bbda1+JZgoePiw+mMrrb6e+brYkIWta6GKleFHVxCfOP
ySenyuYnC0srfG2LXhf7dICO9e7G9fJoIkZfC03QiuMEzZ8ky5ocszb+ZcMU8ATH
dZVZfZWFvoLEzRs6aBOKffyzyUUPedLa5X+G/w+TPiDecktkTMmj9pSMh+W+nGov
dqb5aYX6NEwi4zcv2WHPw2tgMcvslrpTInLHl3zU0YI/lGa+sBssneJxn0Lw5rPN
gq5RlyXECL6EqGYOc1ifjuuHGli8hC8hHRX8wcm0y0wwbMYC0HgB3A==
=r7eB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Helene De Portes
We're newbies and you told us Reliable is best. You lied. Reliable
is a toy. Why did you lie to us?
Nomen Nescio
ROTFLMAO!!!
Whooopsie! I think that was meant to be a signature with a 666 bit key.
News-Flash!
Jack B. Nymble gives away Frog-Admin as an anonymous troll.
Use JBN too long and you'll give away your own anonymity.
The Black Troll
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On 15 Sep 2003, Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>
>>Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
>>Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
>
>Sorry for forgetting the quotes in my PGP-signed message and not mentioning
>my sources.
Bwaaaah! Liar Liar pants on fire!
>"Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin"
> is a quote from Farout-Admin (2001/01)
> in a mail exchange between me (Frog-Admin), Farout-Admin and
>ComputerCryptology
Ohhhh! Now he "outs" private mail.
Damned if trolling, damned if not.
I'd give you a shovel, but you seem to be digging quickly enough without one.
Six feet down should do nicely.
>Along with this one
>"Frog-Admin is a primary target. Probably _the_ target for many
>anti-remailer/privacy people. An organized attack, likely. By a TLA or
>something, I doubt it. In the troll world, being able to claim "spnak" on
>Frog-Admin would be a feather in ones cap. The anti-remailer crowd would
>like nothing better than to discredit a very popular remailer and cause
>in-fighting between other operators."
You started it you invaded Pol^W^W blocked other remailers.
>"Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird"
> is a quote from an anonymous private mail (2001/03)
> about the activities of the anti_Frog troll at the time.
Do you *really* think anyone believes you anymore? You've been promising
evidence to back up your claims that Len Sassaman and Peter Palfrader were
responsible for attacks against your remailer for years now. Where is the
evidence? Apart from in a dark corner of your psychotic little brain?
privacy.at Anonymous Remailer
On 17 Sep 2003, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Frog-Admin) wrote:
>
>On 15 Sep 2003, Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>
>>Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
>>Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
>
>Sorry for forgetting the quotes in my PGP-signed message and not
>mentioning my sources.
>
>"Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin"
> is a quote from Farout-Admin (2001/01)
> in a mail exchange between me (Frog-Admin), Farout-Admin and
>ComputerCryptology
>
>Along with this one
>"Frog-Admin is a primary target. Probably _the_ target for many
>anti-remailer/privacy people. An organized attack, likely. By a TLA or
>something, I doubt it. In the troll world, being able to claim "spnak" on
>Frog-Admin would be a feather in ones cap. The anti-remailer crowd would
>like nothing better than to discredit a very popular remailer and cause
>in-fighting between other operators."
>
>"Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird"
> is a quote from an anonymous private mail (2001/03)
> about the activities of the anti_Frog troll at the time.
How lame to blame an anonymous "PRIVATE" email for words YOU used.
Every signed message from Frog-Admin that I see on my server was sent
through his own remailer. All the Message-ID's contain the
"@Gilgamesh-frog.org" domain **** EXCEPT **** this one
Message-ID: <0eea20aab54c4bfa...@firenze.linux.it>
I guess every troll has the old "anonymous private email" card up his
sleeve, it's the only card to play when they get caught.
Face it, you got caught red handed trolling on your own behalf. A smoking
gun if ever there was one that FROG IS A PROVEN TROLL.
This must be added to Doc Cyphers list.
The Black Troll
>
>On 15 Sep 2003, Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>
>>Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin.
>>Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird.
>
>Sorry for forgetting the quotes in my PGP-signed message and not mentioning
>my sources.
Bwaaaah! Liar Liar pants on fire!
>"Frog-Admin is taking most of the abuse and he got a thick skin"
> is a quote from Farout-Admin (2001/01)
> in a mail exchange between me (Frog-Admin), Farout-Admin and
>ComputerCryptology
Ohhhh! Now he "outs" private mail.
Damned if trolling, damned if not.
I'd give you a shovel, but you seem to be digging quickly enough without one.
Six feet down should do nicely.
>Along with this one
>"Frog-Admin is a primary target. Probably _the_ target for many
>anti-remailer/privacy people. An organized attack, likely. By a TLA or
>something, I doubt it. In the troll world, being able to claim "spnak" on
>Frog-Admin would be a feather in ones cap. The anti-remailer crowd would
>like nothing better than to discredit a very popular remailer and cause
>in-fighting between other operators."
You started it you invaded Pol^W^W blocked other remailers.
>"Other remops should be safe from cretins like the obnoxious bird"
> is a quote from an anonymous private mail (2001/03)
> about the activities of the anti_Frog troll at the time.
Do you *really* think anyone believes you anymore? You've been promising