Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Censorship? A sad fact.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Baal

unread,
Nov 2, 2009, 7:20:14 PM11/2/09
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

dna wrote in alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun November 1 2009 19:16 in
Message-ID: <9pZGm.24708$zt3....@newsfe03.ams2>

> The remailer system is meant to provide a system for people to express
> their ideas without being caught.

"Without being caught" ?? Weasel-words implying that remailer users are
involved in illegal activity. Remailers are there to allow people to speak
their minds freely without having to fear retaliation for expressing their
opinions.

> But the system is being abused by some.

Practically everything ever made is open to abuse. Also, what you may
consider 'abuse' someone else might not.

> I am not one of those, I have tried before & failed to see 95% of my
> messages arriving. Rapists, child attackers have successfully posted. But
> not me, I wonder why.

Maybe because they took the time to learn how to use the technology, instead
of expecting instant gratification? Maybe because, when they needed help,
they asked /politely/ instead of impugning both posters and operators alike?

Right off the bat you seem to be ascribing malice to the fact that your
efforts have been largely unsuccessful, to date.

> I have asked for help, yet got no reply.

I don't remember seeing you ask, and I read this group on a regular basis.

It's one thing to come in here and ask for help; it's quite another to come
in here alleging malice and malfeasance in addition to a conspiracy to keep
you from posting.

> The whole process of being anonymous is that, yet I cannot be. I have
> protected women from being attacked, posted e mails off, nothing got
> through, this is a sad inditement indeed.

Have you never thought it might be due to a lack of technical competence?

There are a huge number of people who use these services everyday. If you
hadn't come in here with a massive chip on your shoulder, assuming
malfeasance on the part of remailer users, in addition to malice on the part
of remailer operators, I might have been inclined to help you out.

However, given your negative attitude, you can get stuffed!

> Dee. Not v pleased.

Baal <Ba...@Usenet.org>
PGP Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1E92C0E8
PGP Key Fingerprint: 40E4 E9BB D084 22D5 3DE9 66B8 08E3 638C 1E92 C0E8
Retired Lecturer, Encryption and Data Security, Pedo U, Usenet Campus
- --

Name calling, screeching usenet posts and the posting of R/L info doesn't
save children -- quality information [given to law-enforcement] does.
-- ThePsyko

If he [Psyko] doesn't hand over the shitbags [to me] than I have no use for
him.
-- Bob&Carole quoted in Message-ID:
<5d7c6be3-b73c-4b86...@h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>

Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?" -- "Who will watch the Watchmen?"
-- Juvenal, Satires, VI, 347. circa 128 AD

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJK72BCAAoJEAjjY4weksDo1W0H/iLtWtIdLjBYBH4IeW+RmJwn
jv1/6zvmge7tUpkggnttWB8lZi6Nj523K+KBwVlmviqXbBSiUkO/wDwMBmx3F3fP
Xu019lnl3nk7ryLzGuJjQfnK401gdekNgqK4QxHfb/JtIgWz1wmGZbOl1RIvwoOe
7c/MZGtXfd7+DQM5lQ5pVlDt54REiGaxC7jFLTxlkv45re3YmGueJY28JXtHBRyF
8yyRoc9JnV7G+yvJbJnqoVUzDqQSfv8hFO/mtIwT81r6w57NLtUOMkep+YLv3LA5
fZP9eedrtmxo50dXRAVjwc14HspQMaspgnYXOPO0hd7gzi9SwLFJBVQyFD9rqGI=
=4tjz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

noauth

unread,
Nov 3, 2009, 6:47:07 AM11/3/09
to
Baal wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> dna wrote in alt.privacy.anon-server on Sun November 1 2009 19:16 in
> Message-ID: <9pZGm.24708$zt3....@newsfe03.ams2>
>
> > The remailer system is meant to provide a system for people to express
> > their ideas without being caught.
>
> "Without being caught" ?? Weasel-words implying that remailer users are
> involved in illegal activity.

An interesting peek into the pedofuck mind. Only a self-loathing
scumbag would assume being caught and illegal activity were
synonymous. Personally, I took it to mean caught by an oppressive
regime or shady employer, but then I'm not a filthy baby raping
subhuman.

*shrug*

> Practically everything ever made is open to abuse. Also, what you may
> consider 'abuse' someone else might not.

There you go! More typical pedofuck tactics. Your obscene obsession
and abhorrent excuse for a life are just a "difference of opinion",
right?

*laugh*

Predictable and consistent as always. You pedofucks are almost too
easy. I'm going to have to start predicting which of the half dozen
or so lines of pedofuck rhetoric your sorry asses are going to
dredge up in response to any given post just to make things
interesting. :)

Message has been deleted

dna

unread,
Nov 3, 2009, 3:58:04 PM11/3/09
to

"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixm...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in
message news:cce6f7921e00ff47...@remailer.privacy.at...
>
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:47:07 +0100 (CET), noauth
> <an...@remailer.gabrix.ath.cx> wrote:
>
>>*shrug*
>
>>*laugh*
>
> you've got it all happening. now show us your mime act.

I am not interested in having an arguement, but what can be don to make sure
my messages reach their destination?


Kulin Remailer

unread,
Nov 3, 2009, 9:22:49 PM11/3/09
to
In article <vP0Im.30679$7Y2....@newsfe27.ams2>
"dna" <nospam.or...@nospamyahoo.com> wrote:

> I am not interested in having an arguement, but what can be don to make sure
> my messages reach their destination?


You were answered by the kulin remop in
Message-ID: <X0IQ6UFV4012...@reece.net.au>

Have you even bothered to try any of the suggestions he made?

dna

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 2:49:04 AM11/4/09
to

"Kulin Remailer" <rema...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:SFXZDS5J40121.4325115741@reece.net.au...
>Where were they made?


Kulin Remailer

unread,
Nov 3, 2009, 7:03:20 PM11/3/09
to
In article <vP0Im.30679$7Y2....@newsfe27.ams2>
"dna" <nospam.or...@nospamyahoo.com> wrote:

> I am not interested in having an arguement, but what can be don to make sure
> my messages reach their destination?

Reece

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 3:20:57 AM11/4/09
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <NlaIm.84099$zt3....@newsfe03.ams2>

In case you are unable to find the message by following the link
given above, all I suggested was:

Firstly, ensure your stats and key sources are all the same and
are from a generally reliable source.
Banana is normally a good source. The urls are:

[banana]
mlist.txt http://www.bananasplit.info/echolot/mlist.txt
pubring.mix http://www.bananasplit.info/echolot/pubring.mix
rlist.txt http://www.bananasplit.info/echolot/rlist.txt
pubring.asc http://www.bananasplit.info/echolot/pgp-all.asc

You may want to manually delete your existing docs prior to
updating.

Try the following template.

Host: smtp.myisp.net
From: mye...@myisp.net
From: Your Nick <your...@something.invalid>
Chain: *,*,kulin; Copies=5
To: mail...@bananasplit.info
References:
Newsgroups:
Subject:

- --
Cheers,
Reece

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSvDH6Jm7atpoJPkFEQKPvgCgnGzOFxfdZKAT/0vSr7pGR5+Gk/cAoKT5
kjSaSmqS/oHT2RFDHq0hikya
=AKhB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

♥Ari♥

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:50:24 PM11/5/09
to
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:20:14 +0000 (GMT), Baal wrote:

> Practically everything ever made is open to abuse. Also, what you may
> consider 'abuse' someone else might not.

Like your ass?
--
http://tr.im/1fa6

dna

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 2:37:25 PM11/6/09
to

"Reece" <remaile...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:CY21WYM240121.6812152778@reece.net.au...

Thank you Reece, wiil try this.


0 new messages