Eelbash Closing
Eelbash Admin
Hash: SHA1
As much as I enjoy this geeky little hobby, the Eelbash remailer
and its attendant services will close shortly.
The main reason is that the remailer has become ineffective. For
some time, a number of remailer operators, who have their noses
out of joint, have kept eelbash out of their stats, resulting in
it being less busy than it would otherwise have been. I kept it
going in the hope that those operators would get over their
irritation and realize that, for the good of the remailer system,
other remailers should not be blocked, especially if they are
well-connected exit remailers. Unfortunately, except for one or
two, that didn't happen.
Recently, several more operators got in a snit and 'delisted'
eelbash, causing a further marked drop in the number of incoming
emails.
I don't care to see the work I've done on scripts, and the
payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
and prefer to close the services down.
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFhTnFEC+g9Qawm6QRAq5zAKCiBmLUQYbqhTilBD52eN3tB5KkqwCgrZy+
+lmpgwuWOAvK6eQKM1xVYeI=
=+mIU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thomas J. Boschloo
Eelbash Admin wrote:
> As much as I enjoy this geeky little hobby, the Eelbash remailer
> and its attendant services will close shortly.
>
> The main reason is that the remailer has become ineffective. For
> some time, a number of remailer operators, who have their noses
> out of joint, have kept eelbash out of their stats, resulting in
> it being less busy than it would otherwise have been. I kept it
> going in the hope that those operators would get over their
> irritation and realize that, for the good of the remailer system,
> other remailers should not be blocked, especially if they are
> well-connected exit remailers. Unfortunately, except for one or
> two, that didn't happen.
>
> Recently, several more operators got in a snit and 'delisted'
> eelbash, causing a further marked drop in the number of incoming
> emails.
>
> I don't care to see the work I've done on scripts, and the
> payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
> and prefer to close the services down.
I would have been sad had you actually been running a remailer.
Champagne for everyone!
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRYVCyAEP2l8iXKAJAQGNvwMfQRpuQ7/w2obPcmukfSsnFfBTqXyaJqe9
DzxtkgZhu6IVHSlKFB1PKkfuwir+DE/RlQtYHeSB/RZ8qjjptwtdABpd7gyg9nF6
Vjn8sUvnLwrZ89t23kiGarOMC505LSYf/qhn7w==
=TCgP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Anon] SS
(Firenze Linux User Group) mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
ad...@firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.linux.it or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
Champaign is only for people with culture. As a dutch you better drink Genever. Also it will help you not to suffer so much from your limitations.
[Anon] BigBrother
server at deuxpi.ca. If you do not want to receive anonymous
messages, please contact deuxpi...@deuxpi.ca. For more information
about anonymity, see http://mixminion.net.
With eelbash going down our share of total traffic controlled by us increased again.
On top of that we are pleased to announce that with help of our rootkit another remailer belongs now to our span of control.
Thomas J. Boschloo
[Anon] SS wrote:
>
> Champaign is only for people with culture. As a dutch you better drink Genever. Also it will help you not to suffer so much from your limitations.
I don't need culture to drink Champagne from Champaign. I'll drink any
liquor when I feel like it.
Cheers!
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRYVhsgEP2l8iXKAJAQFmDQMfQ3gqnDNbB6rK/O+UiI8vbMfa/XaX1XJm
os8TsIHY3XmJ0N29wUC0LHVCJ6c6HiAyD/SwsHVlbZBB+NhibrAKfv7GwR6NwIH3
q/A/YOyZ/uf0oZFSN48dta09tGTSa6lMqCt9mg==
=CMWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thomas J. Boschloo
> In article <45854297$0$17992$e4fe...@dreader32.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>> Eelbash Admin wrote:
>>> As much as I enjoy this geeky little hobby, the Eelbash remailer
>>> and its attendant services will close shortly.
>>>
>>> The main reason is that the remailer has become ineffective. For
>>> some time, a number of remailer operators, who have their noses
>>> out of joint, have kept eelbash out of their stats, resulting in
>>> it being less busy than it would otherwise have been. I kept it
>>> going in the hope that those operators would get over their
>>> irritation and realize that, for the good of the remailer system,
>>> other remailers should not be blocked, especially if they are
>>> well-connected exit remailers. Unfortunately, except for one or
>>> two, that didn't happen.
>>>
>>> Recently, several more operators got in a snit and 'delisted'
>>> eelbash, causing a further marked drop in the number of incoming
>>> emails.
>>>
>>> I don't care to see the work I've done on scripts, and the
>>> payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
>>> and prefer to close the services down.
>> I would have been sad had you actually been running a remailer.
>>
>> Champagne for everyone!
>> Thomas
>
Close your mouth.
[Anon] SS
Project Geonosis mixminion server at geonosis.winstonsmith.info. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
ad...@winstonsmith.info. For information about anonymity, see
https://www.winstonsmith.info/pws or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
You better close your mouth otherwise your dutch shit becomes cold.
[Anon] SS
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
Nomen Nescio
> and its attendant services will close shortly.
responsible manner as other operators do. This time you got it right for the
longest time in your chequered history but in the end, like your previous
incarnations, you just couldn't resist messing about with it.
> The main reason is that the remailer has become ineffective.
The remailer was very effective, sadly the operator was not.
George Orwell
A.Melon
Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As much as I enjoy this geeky little hobby, the Eelbash remailer
> and its attendant services will close shortly.
>
> The main reason is that the remailer has become ineffective. For
> some time, a number of remailer operators, who have their noses
> out of joint, have kept eelbash out of their stats, resulting in
> it being less busy than it would otherwise have been. I kept it
> going in the hope that those operators would get over their
> irritation and realize that, for the good of the remailer system,
> other remailers should not be blocked, especially if they are
> well-connected exit remailers. Unfortunately, except for one or
> two, that didn't happen.
>
> Recently, several more operators got in a snit and 'delisted'
> eelbash, causing a further marked drop in the number of incoming
> emails.
>
> I don't care to see the work I've done on scripts, and the
> payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
> and prefer to close the services down.
OK. Please feel free to continue to be a gadfly for, erm, responsible
remailer usage and operations. You have a voice here.
Thanks for all your weird shit.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
Nomen Nescio
> In article <d799e$45853a18$cef8886b$10...@TEKSAVVY.COM>
> Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.org> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > As much as I enjoy this geeky little hobby, the Eelbash remailer
> > and its attendant services will close shortly.
> >
> > The main reason is that the remailer has become ineffective. For
> > some time, a number of remailer operators, who have their noses
> > out of joint, have kept eelbash out of their stats
>
> I kept you out of my stats because your ISP refused my emails, simple
> as that. Otherwise, I would have listed you and let the users decide
> to use you or not.
This is yet another testimonial to the unsuitability of the Eelbash
operator. Even without all the ridiculous "enhancements" its remailer
was sorely lacking because of the misinformed decisions and choices it
made. A billboard lesson in the folly of obsessive behavior.
Good riddance to bad rubbish if it sticks this time. We've all watched
this show before of course, and I'd wager dollars to donuts the Eelbash
admin won't be able to control its addiction any more successfully now
than before.
I'd make that wager with Eelbash admin itself in fact, if we weren't
already painfully aware of certain Eelbash admin character flaws that
make any such wager an exercise in wasting time.......
>
>
>
>
>
DmitryKovtun
"[Anon] BigBrother" <anon-b...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in message
news:200612171523...@deuxpi.ca...
I have arranged for you to have your rootkit installed, the sex change
operation will done without sedation, so you can use your new root asap.
macarro
>> payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
>> and prefer to close the services down.
It is ironic that in the end it is not the cops or your ISP who shut you
down but other remops...
Thanks for the service you have done to anonymity during all these
years, some people accused Eelbash of reading emails but the truth is
that I have never seen any proof of that neither has anyone, I could
myself accuse the Queen of England of being the remop of certain
remailer located in Buckingham Palace, maybe if I do it for a whole year
someone will end up believing it.
I do not agree with the rules you enforced in your remailer though, that
clear, but still a sad loss, at the end of the day when a bomb threat is
sent it is done from your IP not mine, so up to certain point I can
understand remops are extra cautious, that is why some remops choose
middle (I guess).
--
Mapping the internet 24/7 http://www.netdimes.org
Anonyma
> >> I don't care to see the work I've done on scripts, and the
> >> payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
> >> and prefer to close the services down.
>
>
> It is ironic that in the end it is not the cops or your ISP who shut
> you down but other remops...
>
> Thanks for the service you have done to anonymity during all these
> years, some people accused Eelbash of reading emails but the truth is
> that I have never seen any proof of that neither has anyone, I could
You must be the most ignorant cunt to ever read this group. Not only
has the slimy bastard admitted he reads mail several times, he's
*POSTED* some of it right here in this group.
/me flushes rest of ignorant cunt drivel twice
Nomen Nescio
But how do you feel about the remailer closing down?
Thomas J. Boschloo
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:38:31 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
>> You must be the most ignorant cunt to ever read this group. Not only has
>> the slimy bastard admitted he reads mail several times, he's *POSTED* some
>> of it right here in this group.
>
> But how do you feel about the remailer closing down?
What remailer?
Thomas
Steven Wright
> payments to a pop service, go to such relatively little effect,
> and prefer to close the services down.
>
Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out!
George Orwell
It's a pitty that he closed.
Non scrivetemi
>
> In article
> <57ac4cf23ac08fbc...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
> Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-
> 200612.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
> >
> > In article <293ef1cf7572aef1...@mixmaster.it>
> > George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> > >
> > > I had never problems with eelbash. He posted everything I mailed.
> > > It's a pitty that he closed.
> > >
> >
> > Isn't there a part of you that thinks it's pathetic to
> > pretend to be somebody else to praise yourself?
>
> Same here. Both Eelbash and Frog were reliable, but unloved by
> some. I've personally never had a problem with either. Having
Then you personally don't give a rat's ass about being lied to,
being subjected to the petty tantrums of children, or the quality of
the remailer network and security of your anonymous traffic in general.
Running a remailer is more about what you don't do than it is about
uptime and quick delivery. Any moron could set the software up and have
it running reliably with 30 spare minutes an a little dumb luck. Beyond
that unimpressive accomplishment all Frog Admin did was cause trouble,
and Jiang WuTard never even mastered the dumb luck part in spite of the
endless hours he spent embarrassing himself by trying.
Neither one of them added anything of any real value to the remailer
network, and they both invested a considerable amount of time in trying
to splatter as much egg on its face as possible. Good riddance to both,
we're all better off without them.
> said that, I've never had much of a problem with any remailer.
> Kal-El was a disapointment, but I'm not exactly demanding my
> money back.
>
Non scrivetemi
> > > Same here. Both Eelbash and Frog were reliable, but unloved by
> > > some. I've personally never had a problem with either. Having
> >
> > Then you personally don't give a rat's ass about being lied to,
> > being subjected to the petty tantrums of children, or the quality of
> > the remailer network and security of your anonymous traffic in
> > general.
>
> Nope. Not one bit. I don't care if the owner of the exit
<prune>
Sorry, my mistake. It's not that you don't care, you're just too dull
witted to comprehend the simple logic behind how bad nodes diminish
network security and viability, and why known bad nodes should be
shunned because of that.
Every message you sent through Frog as an exit was a stab in the back
to the remailer network because of the abuse and harassment it carried
with it. Every message you sent through Eelbash diminished the
network's reputation likewise. Not to mention the fact that both
operators were known snoops who on at least one occasion each actively
tried to compromise someones anonymity.
If your goal was useful anonymity as you claim, using either service was
self defeating. But here you are, defending the right to contradict
yourself with "long chains" and sexual preference irrelevancies.
Oh, the irony!
Anonyma
> In article
> <ea89f4bfc18ba629...@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> "Non
> scrivetemi" <nonscr...@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
> >
> > Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > In article
> > > <57ac4cf23ac08fbc...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
> > > Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-
> > > 200612.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In article <293ef1cf7572aef1...@mixmaster.it>
> > > > George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I had never problems with eelbash. He posted everything I
> > > > > mailed. It's a pitty that he closed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Isn't there a part of you that thinks it's pathetic to
> > > > pretend to be somebody else to praise yourself?
> > >
> > > Same here. Both Eelbash and Frog were reliable, but unloved by
> > > some. I've personally never had a problem with either. Having
> >
> > Then you personally don't give a rat's ass about being lied to,
> > being subjected to the petty tantrums of children, or the quality of
> > the remailer network and security of your anonymous traffic in
> > general.
> >
> >
>
> Then don't fucking use it if you don't like it!
> Meanwhile, he is providing a service.
So is your mother. What's your point?
Nomen Nescio
>
> Sorry, my mistake. It's not that you don't care, you're just too dull
> witted to comprehend the simple logic behind how bad nodes diminish
> network security and viability, and why known bad nodes should be
> shunned because of that.
Interesting comments. What constitutes a 'bad' node?
If an exit remailer sends message after message to a newsgroup, messages
obviously designed to disrupt the newsgroup or to stalk one of its regular
posters, messages that it could have filtered, does that behaviour by the
remailer make it a 'bad' node?
If an exit remailer does nothing to stop a flood when it could filter it,
does that make it a 'bad' node?
It seems to me that an exit remailer can be a 'bad' node for lots of
reasons, some of which, like the ones mentioned above, don't get labelled
as 'bad', though they probably hurt the remailer network quite a bit,
certainly in the eyes of the newsgroups' readers who are the victims of
the remailer.
George Orwell
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 20:27:49 +0100, Non scrivetemi wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake. It's not that you don't care, you're just too
> > dull witted to comprehend the simple logic behind how bad nodes
> > diminish network security and viability, and why known bad nodes
> > should be shunned because of that.
>
> Interesting comments. What constitutes a 'bad' node?
>
> If an exit remailer sends message after message to a newsgroup,
> messages obviously designed to disrupt the newsgroup or to stalk one
> of its regular posters, messages that it could have filtered, does
> that behaviour by the remailer make it a 'bad' node?
No. It makes it a remailer being used by 'bad' people.
>
> If an exit remailer does nothing to stop a flood when it could filter
> it, does that make it a 'bad' node?
No. It makes it a remailer being abused by 'bad' people.
>
> It seems to me that an exit remailer can be a 'bad' node for lots of
It seems to me that your unrequited obsession is causing you to try
and rationalize the behavior that got you kicked to the curb by the
remailer community, by drawing some imaginary parallel between the
choices emotionally mature operators make regarding abuse and the
wholesale juvenile fukwittery that's become your sole defining
quality Jiang.
You need help. Not more enabling.
Nomen Nescio
> >Sorry, my mistake. It's not that you don't care, you're just too dull
> >witted to comprehend the simple logic behind how bad nodes diminish
> >network security and viability, and why known bad nodes should be
> >shunned because of that.
>
> "Bad nodes" according to who?
Well let's see.... most remops for one. Most users for another. Yup,
I'd say that the consensus was in and the opinion of a couple sock
puppets won't change it. Sorry about your luck.
>
>
> >Every message you sent through Frog as an exit was a stab in the back
> >to the remailer network because of the abuse and harassment it
> >carried with it.
>
> My posts through Eelbash and Frog went through and posted just fine.
See this is your problem. You're anal. You haven't the ability to see
things from any perspective but whether or not your messages got from a
to b in whatever amount of time made you feel significant, nor do you
have the ambition to achieve any other level of understanding.
Fortunately for the rest of us, anyone who really matters realizes the
things you hold so dear are far secondary to other concerns.
Unless you're willing and able to comprehend the big picture here all
you're doing is wasting our time. Good day.
<childish challenges deleted>
George Orwell
> >> "Bad nodes" according to who?
> >
> >Well let's see.... most remops for one. Most users for another. Yup,
> >I'd say that the consensus was in and the opinion of a couple sock
> >puppets won't change it. Sorry about your luck.
>
> So you've personally decided what the consensus is for remops and
> users. Interesting.
It's amusing, but not at all surprising, that you percieve the ability
to read stats sources and opinions posted to public forums as an
accomplishment worthy of "interest". This should be your first clue.
Sentient beings generally aren't so star struck by a capacity to grasp
the painfully obvious.
> >See this is your problem. You're anal. You haven't the ability to see
> >things from any perspective but whether or not your messages got
> >from a to b in whatever amount of time made you feel significant,
> >nor do you
>
> You're right. I don't care what happens as long as my post goes
> through and I can't be traced. I don't care what kind of silly
> dramas go on in this group involving you, Eelbash, Frog, Twisty,
> Banana, Amigo, Panta, or Richard Simmons. All I care about is that
> my post goes through anonymously. If a post can't be traced to me,
Rubbish. You care nothing about any of that. Given the fact that the
actions of people like Frog Admin and Jiang Wu diminish the ability of
the remailer network to service your stated needs in at least two easily
demonstrable ways, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that all
you care about here is promoting some agenda or stroking your own
bruised ego. Or..... you're just too dense to understand how technical
breaches of protocol and impugning the reputation of the remailer
network as a whole diminish its capacity to deliver mail, and do it
anonymously.
Given your "interesting" comment I suppose the latter is a distinct
possibility. And I'm sorry but any first year student of security
knows your adolescent "who am I" challenge proves nothing, either way.
We can discard it as desperate straw grabbing or unwitting ignorance
because we already know that when addressing a question with no
absolute answer single anomalies are irrelevant. Outing you wouldn't
prove the network insecure any more than not being able to is
irrefutable evidence that it is secure. Besides, we already know what
you are, which makes "who" meaningless and uninteresting no matter how
obvious it is. :)
Non scrivetemi
> In article <beada553271a20c2...@mixmaster.it>
> George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> >
> > Anonymous wrote:
> >
> > > >> "Bad nodes" according to who?
> > > >
> > > >Well let's see.... most remops for one. Most users for another.
> > > >Yup, I'd say that the consensus was in and the opinion of a
> > > >couple sock puppets won't change it. Sorry about your luck.
> > >
> > > So you've personally decided what the consensus is for remops and
> > > users. Interesting.
> >
> > It's amusing, but not at all surprising, that you percieve the
> > ability to read stats sources and opinions posted to public forums
> > as an accomplishment worthy of "interest".
>
> I said nothing about reading stats.
<flush>
Of COURSE you didn't. You CAN'T mention stats and newsgroups because
they prove beyond doubt what remops and users think. They make you look
like a blubbering idiot so those things don't exist.
Grow up eelbash. You're not fooling anyone.
Anonyma
Thomas J. Boschloo
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
[snip]
> By the way, when are you going to prove that my using Eelbash,
> Frog, or any other remailer compromises my privacy when I post
> to usenet? This is the third time I've asked this, and the
> third time you've avoided the question.
One point for using a slightly longer chain when including one of these
evil dead remailers in your chain.
Several billion points minus for bad taste and ignorance.
> Feel free to post my
> true IP or name from any posts I've made using Eel or any other
> remailer as an exit.
Interesting chain of deduction. If you can't figure out my IP; Eelbash
/and/ Frog must be good remailers. Let me try another one in that line
of reasoning. If you can't figure out what 'J.' stands for in Thomas J.
Boschloo XS4ALL /must/ be a good provider.
Why don't you post your own IP if you are so clever. I doubt you have
the mental capabilities to figure even that out Asstard.
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZk6XAEP2l8iXKAJAQG0QQMgty9/l6RL03nSAUboeu0wxZxQHWk5V32z
7My3c8Bfu/vxy4aVdY95J7/bO8H3RY+My4Pa1vtYkEs2mGXLE1v/+EKEvceWlEGO
9ON/jBCtC7Wy4XgArmuShXS5DNesdkQKLrFG9A==
=Fs+p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thomas J. Boschloo
Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
[snip]
> The reason for the challenge is because the claim is always made
> that Eelbash, Frog, or whoever compromises your privacy.
> Really? How? If he's at the end of a 10 remailer chain, how
> does that blow my privacy? It was a rhetorical challenge,
> because obviously neither you nor anyone else can tell me what
> my real IP is.
I know that I won't die if I eat dog shit from the streets. That doesn't
mean I go do it just because I won't die of it.
Just like using your remailer. It might sound like a good idea to you.
But not to the rest of us.
Maybe if there were a number of remailers left that allowed you to be
the best. But I rather gnaw my foot off than use it just because I have
something anonymous confide to the world.
Now go piss off you little retard,
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZlrKAEP2l8iXKAJAQFpvAMfco542ntWXhAfQFqhLQ1+DPCp+6TLdycG
ucJVkiv5N/LCSgi1xkkh79pulIlnpWASYU2sGPULOWcJBIGC3T3RIuDIA1GXIRO2
zelTpMDJGdwiWiuBhnHIdg1usD6yMsACqBrSWg==
=kpwV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
nob...@mixminion.paranoici.org
Thomas J. Boschloo
nob...@mixminion.paranoici.org wrote:
> You don't die, if you eat dog shit from the streets, because as a Dutch you are used to it.
That was a difficult one for you, wasn't it? Why don't I eat dog shit.
Why don't I eat dog shit? Oh yeah, because I drink champagne and eat
goose livers! I've got so much style. So much class. Much better than
the Dutch. The dutch would eat dog shit <gniffle>. Not us! We are soo
much better than the dutch. So much more sophisticated! So much more
grace and elegance! Noone compares to us. We are the cream of the remop
community.
You still don't get it, do you?
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZl2IAEP2l8iXKAJAQEspgMfQ1LDtaeSqu1rGc5MJlrgLzjoh6wNKHR+
JKp/Tu4lHxzcCE5Er5uRqu4M4q+Kv5X+kQn4GxeR5cgV/I03LZwXbgpxEC/mqS7+
bDqLtecLt7TWBrX3vKWkParbtOMawj6K0S/61g==
=A6+a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
George Orwell
> I'm fully aware of what people claim here about Eelbash, Frog,
They're not claims, they're well documented facts. In some cases
they're even admissions from the operators themselves.
> etc. So, nope. No ignorance here, asstard. You are however
> correct that if I use a long chain (which I do, in addition to
> using Tor), then it makes no fucking difference, which is what
> I've already said.
You inist it makes no difference because you choose to ignore the
obvious and dwell on willfully incomplete sets of facts. Not only have
both Frog and Eelbash operators actually made remailer user names
public, the net effect of having abusive nodes is to diminish the
reputation and effectiveness of the remailer network as a whole.
Of course you already know all that because you've answered those
points with nothing but repeating your meaningless, juvenile challenge.
A tactic as transparent as fresh cleaned glass. You're fooling no one.
> The reason for the challenge is because the claim is always made
> that Eelbash, Frog, or whoever compromises your privacy.
They do. Clearly and demonstrably. Both directly and indirectly as has
been explained to you several times now. And your challenge proves
nothing at all either way, no matter what the outcome. Another fact you
conveniently ignore in favor of repeating the irrelevant challenge
itself.
I'm sure there's some official medical nomenclature assigned to that
sort of behavior, but I don't for the life of me know what it is. To
the layperson it's just so much beating of chests.
Thomas J. Boschloo
George Orwell wrote:
[snip]
> They do. Clearly and demonstrably. Both directly and indirectly as has
> been explained to you several times now. And your challenge proves
> nothing at all either way, no matter what the outcome. Another fact you
> conveniently ignore in favor of repeating the irrelevant challenge
> itself.
>
> I'm sure there's some official medical nomenclature assigned to that
> sort of behavior, but I don't for the life of me know what it is. To
> the layperson it's just so much beating of chests.
It is called stupidity. And I am afraid there is no cure for it yet so
we are probably stuck with this guy for a little longer :-( I actually
think this guy has a degree in stupidity. Clearly on display above his
desk for all to see. Proud and ignorant.
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZl5TAEP2l8iXKAJAQHX5AMdH/crAfkS/Qy9Q/7D7AnFYMU1KR+Pf4ro
XwkqkBC+2AOyzBkqNJUaBxMxECv0yDVJmkGiErQPqu6Jusl7diOxD0AhKDld/P1G
e7Xh9GTgK5BqogDyytnZdCyCDwoYDAqJmAqa0g==
=hZoD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
nob...@pboxlevel3.homelinux.net
Project Pboxmix mixminion server at pboxmix.winstonsmith.info. If you
do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
ad...@winstonsmith.info. For information about anonymity, see
https://www.winstonsmith.info/pws or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
At least you got it and that was difficult enough. But we are patient with the Dutch. Why don't you suicide ? You would really do the world a service. One uncultered Dutch less.
Thomas J. Boschloo
nob...@pboxlevel3.homelinux.net wrote:
>
> At least you got it
I wrote it you piece of dog crap. Of course I get it. Or do I look like
someone who is talking out of his ass? And no, before you jump to
conclusions, I am not a dog and I didn't shit you out of my ass. You
would have more grace if you were made of human shit.
[snip]
> But we are patient with the Dutch. Why don't you suicide ?
Not before I make you totally miserable. You give me reason to exist in
this group.
> You would really do the world a service. One uncultered Dutch less.
Why don't you come to Holland and kill a bunch of us. You will be
revered among your peers! You know how plane reservations work?
Sounds like a good plan eh!
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZmNwwEP2l8iXKAJAQFQFwMePsG7vSrlHfB4FvKPp+sRdepX/2bbRV6H
tGtNBNdKIbyFDnQvnzL/4pY1M7kQEJjaxrl3u22/KMbf0HilK0Qx1P91GRfliy7G
vhr+ulIBNUB0N95bNkh3GiZZljGKZhMTMBn96Q==
=IGrZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
nob...@nefarion.homelinux.net
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
You will never make me as miserable as you already are. Why do you still resist ? It is just a small step. Take your final decision and suicide. You really would do the world a great favour.
George Orwell
> In article <76eaa144d76608fa...@mixmaster.it>
> George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> >
> > Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
> >
> > > The reason for the challenge is because the claim is always made
> > > that Eelbash, Frog, or whoever compromises your privacy.
> >
> > They do. Clearly and demonstrably. Both directly and indirectly as
> > has been explained to you several times now.
>
> You haven't explained anything. If I use Frog or Eelbash as an
> exit behind Tor and 10 other chained remailers to post to
> usenet, HOW DOES THAT COMPROMISE MY PRIVACY?
The same ways they compromise your privacy, and the integrity of the
network as a whole, if you chain 20 remailers and proxy Tor through JAP
to get to your entry node. Exactly the same way they do if you use a
chain of 2 and no proxy. Precisely the ways that have been explained to
your thick headed self at least twice now, which have nothing to do
with you screaming your ridiculous "prove who I am" horse shit like
some 4 year old.
>
> Perhaps you'd care to explain right here for everyone. I'm
> waiting for your explanation.
Google Groups is that way ---------------------->
It's already been explained to you twice now by two different people
in two different ways. If you haven't been able to "get it" after that
there's no way endlessly repeating it here is going to help. Figure it
out for yourself or live in ignorance kiddo. Really makes no difference
to anyone but you either way.
Thomas J. Boschloo
[snip]
> At least I'm not too stupid to hold a job. How about you,
> deadbeat slob?
Hehe, I don't get along well with people who do stupid things (or try
and make me do stupid things). And you know how unlimited my IQ is as
you pointed out yourself.
Thomas
--
Stupidity is *not* an option!
Thomas J. Boschloo
[snip]
> That's funny. You were the one that started talking about
> eating dog shit. Your were the originator of this obsession
> about eating dog shit.
You were the one that started talking about using Eelbash or Frog as an
exit. Most people would find that just as offensive as eating dog shit.
You still don't get the analogy do you? Don't worry. I will get through
to you somehow in the end.
Thomas
Thomas J. Boschloo
[snip]
> You will never make me as miserable as you already are. Why do you still resist ? It is just a small step. Take your final decision and suicide. You really would do the world a great favour.
I tried that once but Frog-Admin said I hoaxed. I guess I am just no
good at suicide :-/ Maybe you could show me how?
And then there is the risk I get institutionalized if I fail *again*.
You don't want to burden the dutch tax payers with that do you? You know
an isolation cell is a lot more expensive than an prison cell. Plus all
the sedatives I would get to keep me calm. And then getting off them
again once I move out of the institution. You have clearly not thought
this through, now did you! (hey, I see a pattern here)
Thomas
Thomas J. Boschloo
Non scrivetemi wrote:
[snip]
> Yes, indeed. Your IQ is so great that you're unemployable, and
> have to live off handouts from the taxpayers. How right you are.
No. You got it wrong again. My IQ is so great that you can't see you
don't stand a chance against my flames *AND* I am disabled and thus
unemployable.
Schizo-Affective is what they call it these days. But that doesn't mean
I am not effective at flaming you with my schizo postings.
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZuWTgEP2l8iXKAJAQGshwMcCBSeVLMx6OSMT9znbyTC7HTphZLUvAKC
P2wjdu5FfMT+ekiQcP+F/17eUm+jkHFElKOUc8dBxETI9Dh5uIJZue9ksTWfSXJ3
nHiz3znoWIWDbkRSKgvGbEksyEeoduSGwjVqDw==
=OLYm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thomas J. Boschloo
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
[snip]
> No, most people would rather use Eelbash as an exit remailer
> than sit and consume dog feces. You're the only one who much
> prefers dog feces, which is why you started talking about eating
> dog feces in the middle of a discussion about remailers. Your
> obsessions are showing through in your posts.
>
> Now go eat some more dog feces, shitbreath.
I do prefer eating dog shit to using your remailer. That is correct. And
that is why I won't ever use it (well, used it once as an exit by
accident when I toyed with QS for the first time because AAARG listed
it, but that is not an issue anymore because *EVERYBODY HATES YOU NOW
EELBASH*).
I must say you did the right thing by suiciding your own remailer. The
only sensible thing you ever did in this group.
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZuXdQEP2l8iXKAJAQEPVwMgkYIo4yRJzsc0JZb/0AKJyQZVB5VCmUzB
N39+Kvvoq5mfuDGkxY8tg6HF0hcmyet7LE8sVAeiyK+LkluwMEFg5mp/mAp05bDv
pUiJZgMBTzMyRHGusJVAe69qiz+oys8gXbGTHw==
=KL+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Earl Evleth
George Orwell is really :
Earl & Donna Evleth
5 r. Jean-François Gerbillon
75008 Paris France
(01) 45 48 67 20
evl...@wanadoo.fr
Thomas J. Boschloo
> George Orwell is really :
>
> Earl & Donna Evleth
Quit it with the name dropping all right!
Thomas
Nomen Nescio
> In article <76eaa144d76608fa...@mixmaster.it>
> George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>>
>> Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
>>
>> > The reason for the challenge is because the claim is always made
>> > that Eelbash, Frog, or whoever compromises your privacy.
>>
>> They do. Clearly and demonstrably. Both directly and indirectly as has
>> been explained to you several times now.
>
> You haven't explained anything. If I use Frog or Eelbash as an
> exit behind Tor and 10 other chained remailers to post to
> usenet, HOW DOES THAT COMPROMISE MY PRIVACY?
>
> Perhaps you'd care to explain right here for everyone. I'm
> waiting for your explanation.
He can't explain it because he is full of crap. He will just dance around
and throw a few insults, but he won't explain how such an impossible thing
can happen.
Non scrivetemi
Impossible?
"Impossible is a word only to be found in the dictionary of a fool."
- Napoleon Bonaparte
And quit replying to your own drivel like you really think people will
believe someone agrees with you. It's pathetic.
>
Thomas J. Boschloo
Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> In article <459b95ec$0$29850$e4fe...@dreader27.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>> Non scrivetemi wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Yes, indeed. Your IQ is so great that you're unemployable, and
>>> have to live off handouts from the taxpayers. How right you are.
>> No. You got it wrong again. My IQ is so great that you can't see you
>> don't stand a chance against my flames AND I am disabled and thus
>> unemployable.
>>
>> Schizo-Affective is what they call it these days. But that doesn't mean
>> I am not effective at flaming you with my schizo postings.
>
> Then we agree that you are not mentally capable of holding a
> job. It's obvious.
Yeah. I have a disabled mind. And I am flaming your sorry ass to bits
with it every time I make a post in APA-S. How does that make you feel
about yourself? Quite insulting to your own intelligence isn't it. To be
eating gravel as the result of bugging someone like me with your inane
thought diversions.
You can't even win a flame war with a mental patient. How can you expect
to win anything in live if you aren't even a fair match for me.
Dunk,
Thomas
- --
Falling in love is like being buried alive.
Fun at first but after that it sucks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRZzhZQEP2l8iXKAJAQHbkwMgpEpzoB6F1QsdxPgJ3kP8q7hw/Gip1soO
xTJ5jrdp0J3qjV6aquPLb6U2y9EIS6GzVbDU9B4866GC5YclvOK36wWGiMbfUvtz
o5ukalUmdmVm6MdtQ9uIxcJ6hfwQ7eqCXf8MPw==
=1MAv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Anonymous
> In article <459b9714$0$29859$e4fe...@dreader27.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> > Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > No, most people would rather use Eelbash as an exit remailer
> > > than sit and consume dog feces. You're the only one who much
> > > prefers dog feces, which is why you started talking about eating
> > > dog feces in the middle of a discussion about remailers. Your
> > > obsessions are showing through in your posts.
> > >
> > > Now go eat some more dog feces, shitbreath.
> >
> > I do prefer eating dog shit to using your remailer. That is correct. And
> > that is why I won't ever use it (well, used it once as an exit by
> > accident when I toyed with QS for the first time because AAARG listed
> > it, but that is not an issue anymore because *EVERYBODY HATES YOU NOW
> > EELBASH*).
> >
>
> LOL. You still think I'm Eelbash. If someone says something
> you don't like, then it must be Eelbash. If you're driving and
> someone pulls out in front of you, it must be that evil Eelbash.
> If your welfare check came in late, it must be Eelbash behind
> it. Eelbash is everywhere, isn't he, Thomas. Time to go take
> your meds. Your paranoia is showing - again. Your dogshit
> dinner is getting cold.
He is obsessed with eelbash. What is he going to do with himself when eelbash
finally disappears altogether.
Thomas J. Boschloo
[snip]
> He is obsessed with eelbash. What is he going to do with himself when eelbash
> finally disappears altogether.
That is worth finding out, isn't it?
Thomas
Nomen Nescio
> And quit replying to your own drivel like you really think people will
> believe someone agrees with you. It's pathetic.
SHUT UP THOMAS!
Thomas J. Boschloo
> In article <459d19e6$0$31097$e4fe...@dreader28.news.xs4all.nl>
>> [snip]
>>> He is obsessed with eelbash. What is he going to do with himself when eelbash
>>> finally disappears altogether.
>> That is worth finding out, isn't it?
>
> get a job, slug.
You should go get out and buy a dictionary and find more words to insult
me with.
Anonyma
> Anonymous wrote:
> [snip]
>> He is obsessed with eelbash. What is he going to do with himself when eelbash
>> finally disappears altogether.
>
> That is worth finding out, isn't it?
Thomas, you will always have Frog.