Six Ragheads Attack Fort Dix; Bush Keeps Borders Open Anyway
Way Back Jack
________
REPLY: Horseshit, Islam is the driving force behind the nuttiness.
___________
6 charged with plot on Army base in N.J. By WAYNE PARRY, Associated
Press Writer
FORT DIX, N.J. - Six men described by federal prosecutors as "Islamic
militants" were arrested on charges they plotted to attack the Fort
Dix Army base and "kill as many soldiers as possible," authorities
said Tuesday.
The six were scheduled to appear in U.S. District Court in Camden
later Tuesday to face charges of conspiracy to kill U.S. servicemen,
said Michael Drewniak, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in
New Jersey.
Officials said four of the men were born in the former Yugoslavia, one
in Jordan and one in Turkey. Five of them lived in Cherry Hill, 10
miles east of Philadelphia and 20 miles southwest of Fort Dix,
Drewniak said.
"They were planning an attack on Fort Dix in which they would kill as
many soldiers as possible," Drewniak said.
A law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity because
documents in the case remain sealed, said the attack was stopped in
the planning stages.
Authorities believe the men trained in the Poconos for the attack and
also conducted surveillance at other area military institutions,
including Fort Monmouth, the official said. The official said that the
men had lived in the United States for some time.
The six were arrested trying to buy automatic weapons in a sale set-up
by law enforcement authorities, the official said.
White House spokesman Tony Snow said there is "no direct evidence"
that the men arrested in the Fort Dix plot have ties to international
terrorism.
"They are not charged with being members of an international terrorism
organization," Snow said. "At least at this point, there is no
evidence that they received direction from international terror
organizations. However, their involvement in weapons training,
operational surveillance and discussions about killing American
military personnel warranted a strong law enforcement response."
Asked if those arrested had any ties to al-Qaida, Snow referred
questions to the FBI and the U.S. attorney, but said those
officials "seem to indicate that there is no direct evidence of a
foreign terrorist tie."
Jerri Williams, spokeswoman for the FBI in Philadelphia, said U.S.
Attorney Christopher Christie and J.P. Weis, special agent in charge
of the FBI in Philadelphia, would release more information at a news
conference later Tuesday.
Fort Dix is used to train soldiers, particularly reservists. In 1999,
it sheltered more than 4,000 ethnic Albanian refugees during the
NATO bombing campaign against Yugoslavia.
After that war, refugees were allowed to return to the U.N.-run
province of Kosovo in Serbia or to seek permanent residency in
the United States. The U.N. Security Council is considering
whether to approve a plan to grant Kosovo independence from Serbia
under the supervision of the European Union and the United
States.
Jeff Sagnip, a spokesman for U.S. Rep. James Saxton, who represents
Fort Dix, said the base, along with adjacent McGuire Air Force Base,
has been put on its highest security alert level.
He said Fort Dix typically has 15,000 people, including 3,000
soldiers; McGuire, which is adjacent to Fort Dix, has about 11,500
people.
Soldiers at Fort Dix have been training for warfare in Iraq and
Afghanistan, Sagnip said.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the once-open Fort Dix
has been closed to the public. There are heavily armed guards at
entrances, along with X-ray machines and concrete barriers to make it
impossible for vehicles to rush the entrances.
But the main road through neighboring Cookstown cuts through the base
and is accessible to the public. A half-dozen locations on the base,
including at least two where soldiers were conducting maneuvers
Tuesday morning, were only a few hundred yards off the main road and
accessible to anyone.
The description of the suspects as "Islamic militants" was causing
renewed worry among New Jersey's Muslim community. Hundreds of Muslim
men from New Jersey were rounded up and detained by authorities in the
months following the Sept. 11 attacks, but none was connected to that
plot.
"If these people did something, then they deserve to be punished to
the fullest extent of the law," said Sohail Mohammed, a lawyer who
represented scores of detainees after the 2001 attacks. "But when the
government says 'Islamic militants,' it sends a message to the public
that Islam and militancy are synonymous.
"Don't equate actions with religion," he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070508/ap_on_re_us/fort_dix_plot
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Topaz
By Dr. William Pierce
Today let's talk about some of the things that have changed in America
since September 11. I'm not thinking about all of the new rigamarole
at airports or about how Mr. Bush's campaign of cruise-missile
diplomacy in the Middle East is going or even about how opening the
mail each morning in media offices around the country and in
politicians' offices in Washington has become a much more exciting
operation than it used to be
when Ted Kaczynski was the only person putting dangerous things into
letters.
I'm more interested in the changes in the Politically Correct party
line laid down for the lemmings by the media. I'm interested in
changes in the way Americans view the world. And I'm interested in the
changed prospects for the future of America.
The most interesting thing about the new party line is its stupidity.
The Jews were caught by surprise last month, and they had to whip up
something in a hurry in order to deflect blame from Israel and from
the U.S. government's support for Israel. Apparently the best they
could do on a moment's notice is the explanation that Osama bin Laden
attacked us
simply because he hates our freedom and democracy. Since they first
cooked up that explanation they've refined it quite a bit. Both the
Foreign Ministry in Israel and the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, Israel's enormously powerful lobby in Washington, have been
circulating "talking papers" to their own people, to politicians, and
to everyone else who is likely to be making a public statement about
America's new war or about Washington's past policy in the Middle
East.
These "talking papers" tell people how to counter what the Jews call
Osama bin Laden's "lies" and also how to respond to anyone who
suggests that our government's support of Israel might have had
something to do with the September 11 attack. The papers warn people
never to raise this subject, but if someone else insists on talking
about it, it is to be
countered with the explanation that support for Israel had nothing at
all to do with the attack, that we would have been attacked even if we
weren't supporting Israel, and that the only reason for the attack is
Osama bin Laden's irrational hatred of America's freedom and
democracy.
I believe that it's clear that many people actually believe this
nonsense, judging by the number of cars with red, white, and blue
ribbons tied to their antennas. But these are the people who believe
everything Tom Brokaw or their beloved Big Brother in the White House
tells them. If George Bush came on TV and told them with that
mock-solemn expression of his that a Martian invasion force had just
landed, that the Martians were demanding one million sacrificial
virgins as their price for not destroying Hollywood and Washington,
and that U.S. Army troops would be going door to door to collect
virgins, the folks with the ribbons on their antennas would believe
it, and they would prepare to hand over any virgins in their
households. They would consider it their patriotic duty. The party
line may change from time to time, but lemmings never change.
Well, the lemmings may believe that U.S. support for Israel had
nothing to do with the September 11 attack or with the anthrax-laden
letters now going around, but no one else believes it. Last week the
media bosses were kicking themselves because they had let the text of
a statement Osama bin Laden had made be published in the United
States. They said that they had made a mistake in putting this
statement before the American public. They wouldn't publish any
further Osama bin Laden statements, they said, because the statements
might contain secret instructions for his operatives.
Everyone I've spoken with laughed at that excuse. In his last
statement Osama bin Laden said that Americans would not be secure and
would have no peace of mind as long as Palestinians were not secure in
their own land. That's the sort of powerful and simple message that
even Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Sixpack might understand, and that's
what the Jewish media bosses don't want the public to hear. They're
not worried about secret instructions; they're worried about the
lemmings figuring out what's going on.
Actually, I think there's very little danger of that. And really, the
changes I'm more interested in are in the outlook of the minority of
the population able to think for itself: the minority that doesn't
believe whatever Tom Brokaw says. You know, I've been talking to this
minority for years-decades, actually-warning them about the
consequences of letting their government get out of control, warning
them of the consequences of permitting the Jews of Hollywood and New
York to run our country through their control of our mass media,
warning them of the consequences of continuing to sit on their hands
and keep their mouths shut from fear of being denounced by the media
as "anti-Semites" or "racists."
And I wasn't having as much success as I wanted at getting them to pay
attention and change their ways. Many of those who listened wouldn't
do anything because what I was warning them about didn't seem quite
real. Despite all the changes they could see around them-the
deterioration of our cities and our schools, the darkening of the
racial complexion of America, the trashing of our culture by the mass
media, the increasingly
obvious efforts of the Jewish media bosses to persuade our young women
that they should bed down with non-Whites-despite everything, they
themselves managed to remain comfortable and economically secure, so
the things I was warning them about didn't seem quite real. They had
convinced themselves that they were above it all, that they could
continue to watch the destruction of their country and their people
all around them, and it would never affect them personally: that they
could remain secure and comfortable while everything around them went
to hell. Osama bin Laden jolted some of them awake on September 11:
some of those whose attention I hadn't been able to catch with my own
warnings. He convinced some of them that what they had been observing
going on around them for years was in fact real: that continuing to
ignore the degenerative processes promoted by the media and the
government and hoping for the best really wasn't a good strategy for
personal survival. In particular, he convinced many members of the
thinking minority that losing control of our government really is a
serious matter, that
permitting our government to be used by the Jews against their
neighbors in the Middle East-and also against the genuine interests of
the American people-could have real consequences at home.
I have the feeling that many of these thinking people are paying at
least a little more attention now to the things we've been talking
about here every week. The fact that the number of people who download
these broadcasts from my Web site each Saturday has nearly doubled
since September 11 is a pretty good indication of this, I believe.
Just as I'm getting more hate mail from the red-white-and-blue-ribbon
types, I'm also getting more thoughtful responses from the people who
understand and care. Which is to say, I think I have an audience now
that not only is bigger but also is more attentive and responsive.
That is really important.
I'm not discouraged by the fact that the attentive and responsive
people still constitute only a minority of a minority. I'm encouraged
by the fact that the attentive people now make up a larger minority of
the thinking portion of the population than they did before September
11. Important things always are done by minorities. Majorities don't
make
decisions; individuals do; small minorities do. History is made by
active minorities. Sometimes an active minority may use the passive
majority as a tool or a weapon, but the minority always acts in accord
with its own will.
What's important is which minority is making the decisions, which
minority is active at any particular moment. For at least the past 60
years it's been the wrong minority, an alien minority that is
implacably hostile to our people. If we are to survive, that must
change. Our minority must become active instead. Our minority must
grow to include more of the thinking portion of our population. And
that is happening now. That's been happening since September 11.
The people who understand and care have been forced to begin paying
attention. I have a very strong premonition that there will be other
things in the reasonably near future that will make them pay even
closer attention. The Bush government, just like the Clinton
government before it, thinks that it can stop terrorism with cruise
missiles and smart bombs. But just think for a moment: whether Osama
bin Laden survives the Bush government's current war against Israel's
enemies in the Middle East or not, he already has become immortal. In
the eyes of Muslims he has been elevated to a status in heaven
alongside Mohammed. His name will be praised, and stories will be told
about him around campfires throughout the Muslim world for countless
generations to come, long
after the Bush government has gone and been forgotten. Cruise missiles
can't take Osama bin Laden's immortality away from him. There's
nothing the Bush government can do to diminish his glory in the Muslim
world. In fact, the more cruise missiles and smart bombs the United
States unleashes on the Muslim world, the higher will Osama bin
Laden's esteem rise; the more will his strike against the United
States seem justified to his fellow Muslims.
Don't be fooled by the tame "house Muslims" the media bosses have been
trotting out to explain to the lemmings that violence is abhorrent to
"real Muslims." The real Muslims are the ones rioting against the
government in Pakistan now. The real Muslims are the ones singing
Osama bin Laden's praises now. And there will be no shortage of other
young Muslims lusting for a share in his glory, lusting to have their
praises sung around campfires too. Cruise missiles don't frighten
them. There are enough of them already in this country to keep things
jumping, thanks to the government's insane immigration policy of
recent decades. The anthrax-laced letters that have been going around
all were mailed from inside this country. And anthrax is by no means
the nastiest thing that can be mailed in an envelope. The media won't
even mention the biological warfare agents the government is really
afraid of, because they don't want to give anyone ideas.
The fact is, terrorism has been made much more fashionable since
September 11, and the stakes have been raised. Simple truck bombs
won't get much respect in the future, but I have a suspicion that
we'll see a few more of them anyway. And I suspect that we'll also see
people trying to outdo Osama bin Laden's September 11 televised
extravaganza. The
government and the media suspect the same thing, and they're
frightened. That's why they're trying so desperately to stifle dissent
and keep everyone pledging allegiance to the flag.
At the University of California in Los Angeles a library worker,
53-year-old Jonnie Hargis, has been suspended without pay because he
sent out an e-mail letter criticizing U.S. support for Israel's
aggression. The university administration explained that it has a
policy against using university computers for political messages, but
Hargis, who has worked at the UCLA library for 22 years, pointed out
that no one who has been sending out pro-Israel and pro-war messages
has been punished.
There are similar situations at other universities around the country.
Jews and neo-conservatives post belligerent, bloodthirsty messages
calling for the annihilation of all of the Jews' enemies in the Middle
East, including Iraq and Iran as well as Afghanistan. Anyone who calls
instead for eliminating the cause of the September 11 attack-that is,
for stopping the blind support by the U.S. government of Israel's
aggression-is censured and threatened with expulsion or with being
fired.
There are still people around who can remember how it was at our
universities during the Vietnam war. That was when treason ruled on
campuses. Students burned their draft cards and put up Viet Cong flags
and posters of Ho Chi Minh in their dormitories. Jewish activists in
groups such as Students for a Democratic Society organized pro-Viet
Cong
rallies on campuses. Professors encouraged this activity, and
administrators didn't interfere, citing free speech.
The switch to red, white, and blue ribbons and saluting the flag came
rather suddenly last month, and a lot of thinking people understand
why it came. They understand that it is when America is involved in a
war to promote Jewish interests that pledging allegiance to the flag
suddenly is declared fashionable. When Israel's welfare is threatened,
Jews, ordinarily noted for their cynicism and irreverence, suddenly
put their hands over their hearts and begin singing The Star-Spangled
Banner, and they glare at anyone who isn't singing loudly enough. And
people who make the mistake of asking why get fired or suspended. But
you know, firing people or suspending people who have dissenting
opinions doesn't go down well with the independent thinkers. And I'll
guarantee you:
there will be a lot more dissent before this war is over. And the
Jewish media won't be able to hide it all.
What we are beginning to see now is a sharpening division between the
Jews, their bought politicians, and the "I pledge allegiance,"
authoritarian types on one side, and everyone else on the other side.
We also saw a division, along different lines, during the Vietnam war,
with the authoritarians and the Jews on opposite sides instead of the
same
side. I believe that the division this time will develop faster and
become sharper.
I don't know how the war itself will develop. It was clear before it
began that the U.S. military machine is quite capable of flattening
Afghanistan or any other Third World country without suffering any
significant losses to its own personnel, simply because we can hit
them from a distance with a great deal of destructive power, and they
don't have the means to hit back-except through what we call
"terrorism." It is certain that there will be more terrorism,
although, of course, I cannot predict the form it will take or its
magnitude.
I can predict, however, that the media and the politicians will
denounce it as "cowardly" and will act as if America has been wronged:
that whatever form the next blow against America takes and wherever it
comes from, it will be declared "unprovoked." And I can predict that
the polls published by the media will continue to show nearly every
American
wildly enthusiastic about the war, even as the opposition to the war
grows.
One interesting thing about the opposition this time is that it is
growing both among the Gentile Left and among genuine patriots. During
the Vietnam war the members of the Gentile Left all were on the Jewish
side. Despite the current agreement between leftists and patriots on
the single issue of ending support for Israel and limiting the war in
the
Middle East, I don't see much chance of real collaboration between
these two elements. The Gentile Left is still hopelessly confused on
such essential issues as race and feminism and homosexuality and
permissiveness. But the war is indeed driving a wedge between Jews and
Gentile leftists-a deeper wedge than that driven by the development of
Jewish neo-conservatism after the Vietnam war, and for that we should
be thankful.
There may be other hopeful developments as well. The assassination in
Jerusalem this week of one of Israel's most bloodthirsty Jewish
militants by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
certainly was a welcome move. Until now all of the assassins have been
Jews, and all of the victims have been Palestinians. It's too soon to
know whether
or not this one act of retribution against the Israeli leadership will
be followed by other successful blows, but it may be that the events
of recent weeks have emboldened the Palestinians to act with more
imagination and enterprise than before.
Looking ahead a bit, there are several signs of hope here on our own
home front. The heightened sense of reality among non-lemmings, the
lessening of their sense of detachment, the stronger realization that
they cannot survive by continuing to sit on their hands and watch the
Jews destroy the world around them- -- this is the single most
important consequence of recent events. This, together with the
growing alienation between Gentile leftists and Jews, leaves the Jews
in a weaker position than they have been in a long time. They will
crack their whips more frantically than before, trying to keep
everyone in line, but the principal effect of that will be to generate
even more resentment against them.
Things are a bit brittle now. A few dozen more anthrax cases, another
truck bomb in a well chosen location, and substantial changes could
take place in a hurry: a stock market panic, martial law measures by
the Bush government, and a sharpening of the debate as to how we got
ourselves get into this mess in the first place. As the debate
sharpens, the Jews and their collaborators will pull out all of the
stops in an effort to stifle it, but I don't think that even a
declaration of martial law can stifle it now. Too many people already
smell the stink in Washington. Too many people already understand on
whose hands is the blood of 6,000 innocent Americans who died last
month. Too many people understand the true motivation behind the
current war against Israel's enemies in the
Middle East. The genie is out of the bottle now, and not even Mr.
Bush's new anti-terrorism agency-what does he call it? -- the Office
of Homeland Security? -- not even this new Federal agency can put it
back in the bottle.
It's a strange thing: in a novel I wrote more than 12 years ago - the
title is Hunter-I talked about the formation of a new anti-terrorism
agency, separate from the FBI. And I pointed out that the principal
aim of the new agency would not be to protect the public from
terrorism, but to protect the government from an increasingly restless
and disillusioned public: a sort of modern Praetorian Guard. I think
that we'll be seeing more developments in that direction in the next
few months, with the timing depending upon when the next surprise
comes and its magnitude.
Of course, I don't know what will happen next to shatter already
jangled nerves, but it is likely that something will happen. My advice
to responsible patriots now is this: Expect a surprise, and remain
calm when it comes. But don't wait for it to come to raise your voice.
Speak out now. Don't be intimidated by the mindless yahoos waving
their flags
or by the government or by the media. If you point out calmly and in a
reasoned way who is responsible for what happened to America last
month you will have more people agreeing with you than you might
imagine. If you call for your fellow Americans to join you in
regaining control of their government, the response will be greater
than at any time in recent years.
Thanks for being with me again today.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>Advice for Patriots
>By Dr. William Pierce
Keep a sharp eye peeled for muslime.
And keep those guns cleaned, oiled, and loaded.
Excellent advice, William
Topaz
By Dr. William Pierce
"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.
Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.
So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.
Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.
As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.
And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.
There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.
Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.
Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.
The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.
Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.
Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.
How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?
Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.
Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."
Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.
Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.
In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."
Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.
The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.
Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.
The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.
Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.
Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.
Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.
Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.
Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."
waybackjack
wrote:
>Tiptoe
AN EX-MUSLIM SPEAKS
We watched in the months following 9/11, as Muslim-American groups
began to act as hindrances in the war on terror and the efforts of
Americans to defend themselves. We saw them ignore nearly every act
of Islamic terror that is committed each day, and instead publicize
obscure issues and personal slights against Muslims that are
absolutely trivial by comparison.
Far from accepting responsibility for Islamic terror, Muslims look for
reasons not to act or engage in introspection. Some even grasp onto
wild conspiracy theories that blame Americans for 9/11 - just as the
millions of Jihad victims over the centuries are in some way held
responsible for their own slaughter as well.
And finally, we came to realize that this extraordinary arrogance and
self-absorption on the part of the Muslim community, its inability
neither to empathize with others nor engage in the sort of
self-critique that leads to moral progress is in no way incidental to
the religion.
There is something deeply, deeply wrong with Islam.
Originally, we started this website in the naive hope that perhaps
Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence that is
committed in the name of their religion. Perhaps if they understood,
then they might be motivated to turn the critical eye inward and
resolve those far more important issues that leave so many lives in
agony and force the consumption of so many billions of dollars for
security resources.
But, in our first several years of posting attacks, we never once
heard from a Muslim who wrote to condemn the violence and resolve
themselves to combating it. Neither did we see any change on the part
of Muslim-American groups, or the other Islamic organizations across
the globe, even as the body count mounted to levels that far exceed
the damage done on 9/11.
And so, our mission is to present the truth about Islam and how it is
so tragically different from other religion. We also hope to
memorialize the victims of Islamic terror, and ensure that they do not
die in obscurity as so many victims of Islam have in the last 1400
years.
______________
_ G O D _
news:4641cdb4...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
>
>
> Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence that is
> committed in the name of their religion. Perhaps if they
> understood, then they might be motivated to turn the critical
> eye inward and resolve those far more important issues
> that leave so many lives in agony and force the consumption
> of so many billions of dollars for security resources.
>
> But, in our first several years of posting attacks, we never
> once heard from a Muslim who wrote to condemn the
> violence and resolve themselves to combating it. Neither
> did we see any change on the part of Muslim-American
> groups, or the other Islamic organizations across the
> globe, even as the body count mounted to levels that far
> exceed the damage done on 9/11.
Or, perhaps, COck-sucking sadistic americunts have
deserved it, and were asking for that for quite a while,
and therefore, htere's no words of condemnation has
been offered by this particular religious cult, in whose
name the 9/11 atrocity was created in the first place?
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
waybackjack
wrote:
>"COck-sucker Jack" wrote
>news:4641cdb4...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence that is
>> committed in the name of their religion. Perhaps if they
>> understood, then they might be motivated to turn the critical
>> eye inward and resolve those far more important issues
>> that leave so many lives in agony and force the consumption
>> of so many billions of dollars for security resources.
>>
>> But, in our first several years of posting attacks, we never
>> once heard from a Muslim who wrote to condemn the
>> violence and resolve themselves to combating it. Neither
>> did we see any change on the part of Muslim-American
>> groups, or the other Islamic organizations across the
>> globe, even as the body count mounted to levels that far
>> exceed the damage done on 9/11.
>
>Or, perhaps, COck-
Islam is a filthy, vile, vicious political manifesto of terrorism
masquerading as religion, with its tenets clearly written in the blood
of
its victims. It is political cancer metastasizing into an anti-Western
genocidal cult. Its adherents are the most simpleminded of nationals
cheering the murder of innocent civilians. Islam, like its communist
neighbor, is attempting to destroy all western thought in favor of
intolerance, mass murder and mass conformity. Islam is a direct attack
on
the individualism and freedom of thought that helped create the
western
world. If Islam is permitted its cancerous spread, the world will
enter
another dark age of bigotry, intolerance and the genocidal rage of
madmen
masquerading as religious leaders.
If Israel is any test case, Islam has proven its political ideology is
one
of hate, intolerance and genocidal rage. Virtually every Islamic
nation is
ruled with an iron fist because their Islamic populations behave like
rabid
dogs. Islam has proven itself incompatible with civilized western
values,
and should be treated as a political manifesto of terrorism.
Spare me the body count of other religions. I haven't seen Catholics,
Protestants, Jews, or any other religion take such pleasure in
murdering
innocents in my lifetime. The past is the past, and Islam's murderous
ideology seems to currently command somewhat of a popular monopoly in
the
"joy of killing" Westerners, and, being a Westerner, I'm quite
prepared to
return the favor a thousandfold.
For Westerners, the destruction of Islam is a matter of survival.
Unfortunately, too many religious individuals have been fooled into
granting
Islam that which it does not deserve: Survival. I've seen images of
the
followers of Islam jumping, clapping, and cheering in a euphoric
murderous
orgy of twisted joy when some of Islam's storm troopers killed 3,000
Americans on 9/11. Since I'm personally unencumbered by any religious
baggage, I clearly see Islam for the political manifesto of terrorism
that
it is, and that its followers are as deserving of the fate that their
terrorists so willingly bestow upon others. Islam has earned its place
in
history with the bombing of the World Trade Center; now, we just need
to
secure its final resting place in the trash bin of history.
_ G O D _
news:464225ba...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>
>>"COck-sucker Jack" wrote
>>news:4641cdb4...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence that is
>>> committed in the name of their religion. Perhaps if they
>>> understood, then they might be motivated to turn the critical
>>> eye inward and resolve those far more important issues
>>> that leave so many lives in agony and force the consumption
>>> of so many billions of dollars for security resources.
>>>
>>> But, in our first several years of posting attacks, we never
>>> once heard from a Muslim who wrote to condemn the
>>> violence and resolve themselves to combating it. Neither
>>> did we see any change on the part of Muslim-American
>>> groups, or the other Islamic organizations across the
>>> globe, even as the body count mounted to levels that far
>>> exceed the damage done on 9/11.
>>
>
> Islam is a filthy, vile, vicious political manifesto .....
....<snip>... religious crap has been carefully removed....
I understand your feeling toward rivalling religious cult,
COck-sucker Jack. But it's must be the end to all wars.
Americunts have already lost trillions of dollars to them....
waybackjack
wrote:
>"COck-sucker Jack" wrote
>news:464225ba...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>>
>>>"COck-sucker Jack" wrote
>>>news:4641cdb4...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence that is
>>>> committed in the name of their religion. Perhaps if they
>>>> understood, then they might be motivated to turn the critical
>>>> eye inward and resolve those far more important issues
>>>> that leave so many lives in agony and force the consumption
>>>> of so many billions of dollars for security resources.
>>>>
>>>> But, in our first several years of posting attacks, we never
>>>> once heard from a Muslim who wrote to condemn the
>>>> violence and resolve themselves to combating it. Neither
>>>> did we see any change on the part of Muslim-American
>>>> groups, or the other Islamic organizations across the
>>>> globe, even as the body count mounted to levels that far
>>>> exceed the damage done on 9/11.
>>>
>>>Or, perhaps, COck-sucking sadistic americunts have
>>>deserved it, and were asking for that for quite a while,....
>>
>> Islam is a filthy, vile, vicious political manifesto .....
>
>....<snip>... religious crap has been carefully removed....
>
>I understand
Good, now see if you understand this:
EUROPE'S MUSLIM PLAGUE
Muslim Violence — Crime or Jihad?
Fjordman - 3/24/2007
Although the European Union warns against “,” those who live in the
real world know that there has been an explosion of violent
infidelophobia in Western Europe staged by Muslim immigrants. This
wave of violence especially targets
Jews, but the attacks against Christians that are going on in the the
Middle East, where there may soon be no Christians left in the cradle
of Christianity, are increasingly spreading to Europe as well. In more
and more cities across the continent, non-Muslims are being harassed,
robbed, mugged, raped, stabbed and even killed by Muslims, yet EU
leaders continue their quest to merge Europe and the Arab world by
making it easier for Muslims to enter and settle in Europe.
The fact that European leaders and media voice such concern for
“Islamophobia” yet do very little to stop attacks against Christian
Europeans demonstrates the creeping dhimmitude in Europe which has
been accurately predicted by Bat Ye’or. Native Europeans are slowly
becoming second-rate citizens in their own countries.
This violence by Muslims is usually labelled simply as “crime,” but I
believe it should more accurately be called Jihad. Those who know
early Islamic history, as described in books such as The Truth About
Muhammad by Robert Spencer, know that looting and stealing the
property of non-Muslims has been part and parcel of Jihad from the
very beginning. In fact, so much of the behavior of Muhammad himself
and the early Muslims could be deemed criminal that it is difficult to
know exactly where crime ends and Jihad begins. In the city of Oslo,
for instance, it is documented that some of the criminal Muslim gangs
also have close ties to radical religious groups at home and abroad.
As Dutch Arabist Hans Jansen points out, the Koran is seen by some
Muslims as a God-given “hunting licence,” granting them the right to
assault and even murder non-Muslims.
It is hardly accidental that while Muslims make up about tem percent
of the population in France, they make up an estimated seventy percent
of French prison inmates. Muslims are over-represented in jails in
countries all over the world, and a striking number of non-Muslims in
jail also convert to Islam. There could be many reasons for this. Some
observers have suggested that prison inmates generally lack control
over their personal lives, and thus seek a strict code which provides
them with the discipline they themselves don’t have. Perhaps, but
personally I suspect that the most important reason is much more
simple: If you’re a Muslim you can continue doing criminal things yet
at the same time claim to be morally superior. If you rob and mug
non-Muslims you are not a thief or a thug, you are in fact a brave
Jihadist doing God’s noble work:
Tariq Ramadan and Islam’s Future in Europe
"Non-Muslims are lesser people. By saying this they justify the
behaviour of young Muslim criminals who target the non-Muslims whilst
they never touch fellow Muslims. They told me that drug trafficking is
perfectly acceptable as long as one only sells to non-Muslims. They
told me that stealing from non-Muslims is allowed as long as one does
not harm fellow Muslims. One day our office was burgled and our
computers were stolen. All except the two computers belonging to our
two Muslim colleagues. You don’t steal from brothers or sisters! …
Many victims of burglaries in houses and cars, of steaming and other
forms of violence, can testify that aggression by Muslims is not
directed against brothers and sisters, but against whoever is a kafir,
a non-believer. Young Muslims justify their behaviour towards women
who do not wear the headscarf, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, by
referring to the Salafist teaching which says that these women are
whores and should be treated as such. They told me this. I wrote it
down in my reports, but the authorities refuse to hear it."
Andrew Bostom has demonstrated in his book The Legacy of Jihad that
the basic patterns have remained remarkably similar throughout the
centuries, regardless of whether the non-Muslims in question were
Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists. Jihad and dhimmitude
frequently have less to do with huge terror attacks or spectacular
invasions than with accumulated daily humiliations and insults. A
small group of Muslims move into an area, then gradually expand their
numbers and with continuous verbal and physical harassment of
non-Muslims and sexual harassment of their women force them to leave
their homes or convert to Islam. Here is an example from Iran where
the non-Muslims are Zoroastrians, but it might as well have been
certain areas of Amsterdam, Birmingham or the suburbs of of Paris
today:
The Islamization of Europe
Mary Boyce, Emeritus Professor of Iranian Studies at the University of
London, has confirmed the external validity of Bat Ye’or’s analytical
approach in her description of how jihad and dhimmitude (without the
latter being specifically identified as such) transformed Zoroastrian
society in an analogous manner. Boyce has written definitive
assessments of those Zoroastrian communities which survived the
devastating jihad conquests of the mid 7th through early 8th centuries
20. The Zoroastrians experienced an ongoing, inexorable decline over
the next millennium due to constant sociopolitical and economic
pressures exerted by their Muslim rulers, and neighbor. Boyce
describes these complementary phenomena based on an historical
analysis, and her personal observations living in the (central
Iranian) Yezd area during the 1960s:
"Either a few Moslems settled on the outskirts of a Zoroastrian
village, or one or two Zoroastrian families adopted Islam. Once the
dominant faith had made a breach, it pressed in remorselessly, like a
rising tide. More Moslems came, and soon a small mosque was built,
which attracted yet others. As long as Zoroastrians remained in the
majority, their lives were tolerable; but once the Moslems became the
more numerous, a petty but pervasive harassment was apt to develop.
This was partly verbal, with taunts about fire-worship, and comments
on how few Zoroastrians there were in the world, and how many Moslems,
who must therefore posses the truth; and also on how many material
advantages lay with Islam. The harassment was often also physical;
boys fought, and gangs of youth waylaid and bullied individual
Zoroastrians. They also diverted themselves by climbing into the local
tower of silence and desecrating it, and they might even break into
the fire-temple and seek to pollute or extinguish the sacred flame.
Those with criminal leanings found too that a religious minority
provided tempting opportunities for theft, pilfering from the open
fields, and sometimes rape and arson. Those Zoroastrians who resisted
all these pressures often preferred therefore in the end to sell out
and move to some other place where their co-religionists were still
relatively numerous, and they could live at peace; and so another
village was lot to the old faith. Several of the leading families in
Sharifabad and forebears who were driven away by intense Moslem
pressure from Abshahi, once a very devout and orthodox village on the
southern outskirts of Yazd; and a shorter migration had been made by
the family of the centenarian ‘Hajji’ Khodabakhsh, who had himself
been born in the 1850s and was still alert and vigorous in 1964. His
family, who were very pious, had left their home in Ahmedabad (just to
the north of Turkabad) when he was a small boy, and had come to settle
in Sharifabad to escape persecution and the threats to their orthodox
way of life. Other Zoroastrians held out there for a few decades
longer, but by the end of the century Ahmedabad was wholly Moslem, as
Abshahi become in 1961. [Boyce’s footnote: The last Zoroastrian family
left Abshahi in 1961, after the rape and subsequent suicide of one of
their daughters.] It was noticeable that the villages which were left
to the Zoroastrians were in the main those with poor supplies of
water, where farming conditions were hard."
Topaz
By James Petras
Falluja, Baghdad, Ramadi, Nasiriya - an entire people has risen to
confront the colonial occupation army, its mercenaries, clients, and
collaborators. First in massive peaceful protests, they were massacred
by US, British, Spanish and Polish troops: Bare hands against tanks
and machineguns. The armed resistance, in the beginning a minority now
indisputably the most popular force, backed by millions. The colonial
armies, fearful of every Iraqi, shoot wildly into crowds and retreat;
they encircle whole cities, fire missiles into crowded working class
neighborhoods, helicopters pour machinegun fire into homes, factories,
mosques... In the eyes of the colonial soldiers, the enemy is
everywhere. For once they are right. The resistance resists, every
block, every house, every store rings out with gunfire, the resistance
is everywhere. Every house takes hits, the resistance fight on. The
people aid the wounded fighters, wash their wounds. They provide water
to the thirsty to quench their parched throats and cool their hands -
the automatic weapons are hot.
And where are the western mercenaries? The $1,000 dollar a day hired
guns with their flak vests, dark glasses, --their swagger and
insolence have disappeared. They too have seen the charred bodies of
their ex-partners of death.
Hundreds of Iraqis have been killed, thousands have been injured, many
more will die but after each funeral tens of thousands more, the
peaceful, apolitical, "wait and see" ones have taken up the gun.
'It's a civil war', brays the bourgeois press. This is wishful
thinking. Shia and Sunni are in this together, brothers in arms, each
covering their comrades' backs as they confront the tanks. And the
resistance is winning. Never mind the "proportions" - five or ten or
twenty Iraqis for each colonial soldier. The Iraqi Resistance has won
politically: No appointed official has any future : They exist as long
as the US military remains but they will flee from the rooftops of
their bunkers as the US withdraws.
Militarily, the US and the mercenaries are taking thousands of
casualties - scores of deaths and wounded everyday. In Washington, the
civilian militarists, the architects of the destruction of Iraq are
panicking. "Send more troops!" say Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and the
would-be president Kerry. From his Texas ranch, Bush proclaims the
resistance leader Moqtada Sadr a "killer". Far from the fire, the
mayhem, the massacres, his television doesn't show the child with the
mangled face. Bush once again is far from the killing fields - Vietnam
and now Iraq. Now he can claim a draft deferment - he is nominally the
President who unilaterally declared the end of the war in May 2003.
Now, April 2004 there are more than 600 dead US soldiers as the Iraqi
resistance rose to meet Bush's challenge "Bring them on" and took the
streets from the colonial army, then they came on and conquered the
cities and with sheer courage and absolute determination they hold
their ground.
The "Arabs" resist, while the overstuffed cabbage Sharon is silent.
His once loquacious agents, Wolfowitz, Feith, Abrams and their
underlings are strangely silent. Are they worried that there might be
a mass backlash against those who cooked the data to get the US into a
war in which thousands of US soldiers will die and be maimed - in
order to "protect" Israel's undisputed claim to dominance in the
Middle East?
In the early spring of 2004, in April to be exact, the dreams of a new
colonial empire came crashing down on the masterminds of the New World
Order, an undisputed, unilateral Empire. The end of the
Sharon-Wolfowitz-Blair-Chaney "Greater Mid-East Co-Prosperity Sphere".
The Iraqi resistance has turned the Rumsfeld- Wolfowitz dream of a
series of wars against Syria, Iran, Cuba, and North Korea into a
nightmare of bloody street battles on every block in Fallujah and Sadr
City, Baghdad.
The heroism, the valor, the inspiration, the mass resistance is all
the more so as the Iraqi people draw on their resources, their own
solidarity, their own history, their belief that they will be free or
take down every colonial soldier as they fight to the death. The
phrase "Patria o Muerte" takes on a special and very specific meaning
in Iraq: It is not a slogan of a leader, a vanguard, to arouse and
inspire the people - it is the living practice of a whole people.
Patria or Muerte comes out of the mouths of teenage street fighters as
well as street venders and widows with black scarves. The "Iraqi April
Days" are a lesson to for the whole Third World and other would-be
imperial colonialists: Mass armed resistance cannot be politically or
militarily defeated. The heroism of the Iraqi resistance stands in
stark contrast to the cowardly self-styled Arab leaders: The Jordanian
and Saudi monarchs, the garrulous corrupt "President for Life". Not
one has moved a finger to aid the Iraqi national liberation struggle.
They fear the example of the successful Iraqi resistance will light a
fire under their ample buttocks.
And the Western intellectuals? Since the resistance began a year
ago... not a single US intellectual, of the dozens of progressive,
critical thinkers ("Not in My Name") has dared to declare their
solidarity with the anti-colonial struggle. They have "problems", I
hear, "about supporting Arab fundamentalists, terrorists, anti-Semites
etc..."…
The paralysis of the US leftist intellectuals, their inability to
express solidarity with the Iraqi resistance is a disease which
afflicts all "leftist" intellectuals in the colonial countries. They
are fearful of the problem (the colonial war) and fearful of the
resolution (national liberation). In the end, the comforts and
freedoms they enjoy, the university applause and adulation they
receive in the colonial motherland weighs more heavily than the mental
costs of a straightforward declaration of support for the
revolutionary liberation movements. They resort to phony "moral
equivalences", against the war and against the "fundamentalists", the
"terrorists", the 'whoever' who is engaged in their own
self-emancipation and has not paid sufficient attention to the
self-appointed guardians of Western Democratic Values. It is not
difficult to understand the absence of solidarity with liberation
movements among the progressive intellectuals in the imperial
countries: they too have been colonized, mentally and materially.
Thousands of humble people in Iraq are giving these erudite
intellectuals a practical lesson in solidarity: on April 4,2004 in the
midst of hostile tanks and helicopter gunships, thousands marched from
Baghdad to Fallujah carrying food and medicine to the embattled and
encircled people in that city which will forever be remembered as the
cradle of emancipation. Will our intellectuals take note? Can they at
least circulate a statement "In Our Name" in solidarity with the
Iraqui resistance?
In the meantime, the mass popular resistance in Iraq takes on the
well-fed, over-armed armies of occupation in hand to hand warfare.
They do no ask if their neighbor, friends or comrades are Sunni,
secular, Shia, Baathist or Communist, they do not stand aside when a
mosque, a school or a housing project is bombed or machine-
gunned...they have made a commitment to engage in the struggle, to
join in one national movement to oust the invader, the oil thieves,
the murderers at hand and afar. It's a pity, more for themselves than
for any material contribution they could make to the historical
struggle that the US progressive intellectuals have chosen to abstain
and once again demonstrate the irrelevance of the Western
intellectuals to Third World Liberation.
Topaz
The West is the White race.
The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.
And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.
Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.
Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan
"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."
Topaz
The White Nationalist David Duke spoke at a conference in Tehran with
the President of Iran. What others countries are so friendly to White
Nationalists? Yet Way Back wants to bomb and invade and Judaize Iran.
He is a puppet of the Jews.
The Jews Are Our Misfortune
By Dr. William Pierce
If you've been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that
the issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly
every broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the
mass media of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the
opinions and attitudes of about 95 per cent of the population. I have
pointed out
that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in
collusion with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need
most people have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a
perceived norm.
The media bosses use their control over the mass media of
entertainment -- and to a lesser extent over the news media -- to
create an artificial norm that is presented to the public through
television, motion pictures, advertising, and other media, and this
artificial norm is the one perceived as real by most of the public.
Through their control of public opinion the media bosses also control
the democratic political process and governmental policy in a way that
is advantageous to them and disadvantageous to the White public. And
these media bosses are overwhelmingly Jews.
That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many
of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish
media control and have presented different specifics, different
details, in various broadcasts. I've discussed a number of different
Hollywood films or television shows as specific examples of the way in
which the Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to
promote
fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but
that advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and
exploit our society.
(Some of this may be outdated today, but it still explains why things
are the way they are)
I've talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the
mass media, and I've pointed out specific instances of the destructive
way in which they use their control. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Sumner Redstone and his control of MTV and CBS and the
Hollywood film studio Paramount Pictures. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Michael Eisner and his control of the Disney Company and
ABC. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Gerald Levin and his
control of Time Warner and CNN. I've talked about the Jewish media
boss Edgar Bronfman and his control of the largest segment of the
popular music industry and Universal Studios in Hollywood. And I've
talked about dozens of other Jewish media bosses and the media they
control and the specific ways in
which they use those media. In particular, during the past few months
I've talked about several recent Hollywood films which deliberately
target teenaged White girls and brainwash them with the notion that it
is fashionable for them to have sex with Black males.
And of course, I've talked about the Jewish control of the news media
as well as the entertainment media. In a way similar to their use of
the entertainment media to set popular fashions, the Jewish media
bosses distort and censor the news in order to give the public a
distorted picture of what is happening in the world. I've given
several very
specific examples of this Jewish management of the news in recent
months.
I've talked about the total blackout at the national level of the news
of the atrocious rape and massacre of Whites in Wichita, Kansas, by
Blacks last December, and I've talked about the almost total
suppression of the news of the Black racial attacks on Whites in
Seattle in the Mardi Gras riot at the end of February this year. I
also talked about
the downplaying of the racial aspects of the Black rioting in
Cincinnati in April of this year, about the failure of the news media
outside the immediate Cincinnati area to mention the deliberate
targeting of Whites, especially White women, by the Black rioters. And
I described the gross distortions in the news coverage of the racial
politics in York,
Pennsylvania, that led to the current White mayor of York being
charged in May with the killing of a Black during a Black race riot in
York 32 years ago.
I have pointed out repeatedly how all of this suppression of the news
and distortion of the news is aimed at creating and maintaining a
false picture in the public mind of racial conflict in the United
States. In this false picture Whites always are the aggressors, Blacks
or other non-Whites are the innocent victims, and the root of all
racial conflict
is White racism.
In a number of my broadcasts I've discussed at length why the Jews do
what they do: why they use their media control in such a deceptive and
destructive way, what their motives are. I've also talked about how
they collaborate. I've pointed out that their propaganda policies are
not formulated independently, but that they have a coherent party line
that
they all follow. I've given a number of specific examples of this.
Well, all of these things that I've talked about have not gone
unnoticed by the Jewish media bosses themselves. When people expose
their activities or their scheming they pay attention. In particular,
they have been paying attention to these American Dissident Voices
broadcasts and to the work of my organization, the National Alliance.
They read what's on our Web sites at natvan.com and natall.com and
resistance.com, and they talk about it among themselves. This shows up
pretty clearly in the uniform way in which their media respond to us.
Whether it's the Associated Press or Time magazine or the Washington
Post or a television news commentator anywhere in the United States,
they always use the same
phrasing in talking about us. They always use the word "hate" in
referring to us. They always say that the National Alliance is the
"most dangerous organized hate group" in America, despite the fact
that all we do is disseminate to the public the truth about what
they're doing. That's what they regard as "dangerous" and as "hate."
If you want to see a current indicator of the fact that they do think
about us, go to the Web site promoting Steven Spielberg's new
movie,A.I. There you'll see a parody of a part of the National
Alliance's Web site in the form of a page headed "Who Is the
Anti-Robot Militia?" It's obviously copied, almost word for word, from
the page "Who Is the National Alliance?" on our Web site. It's
difficult for me to understand what they hoped to accomplish with this
parody. Perhaps they believe that it will make people take us less
seriously.
Somewhat less quirky but much more directly deceptive are their
standard smokescreen responses. It used to be that whenever I would
raise the issue of Jewish monopoly control of the mass media of news
and entertainment during an interview or on a call-in program, I would
hear the response from a Jew or an apologist for the Jews: "What about
Ted
Turner? He's not a Jew," as if that negated everything I had said. Of
course, that response was used before Ted Turner's CNN was taken over
by the very Jewish Time Warner. And now that Ted Turner has been eased
out of all decision-making positions in the cable news network he
built and has been replaced by Jews, one doesn't hear the Ted Turner
response any longer.
The standard responses today, the ones I hear as often as I used to
hear the Ted Turner response, are the "it's the shareholders" and the
"it's the big bankers." Whenever I start naming names -- whenever I
begin talking about the control over the media wielded by Michael
Eisner or Sumner Redstone, for example, a Jew will pop up with the
response:
"Those guys don't control the media. It's the shareholders who control
the media. Eisner and Redstone are just employees. The shareholders
tell them what to do." A variation on this theme is, "Eisner and
Redstone don't own the media. It's the big banks that own all of the
media, and most of the big bankers are Gentiles."
Well, of course, that's not really true, and they know it's not true.
The big Jewish media bosses are mostly quite autonomous. Sumner
Redstone, for example, owns outright two-thirds of the shares in his
media empire. His personal fortune is more than 12 billion dollars,
according to Forbes magazine this month. I'm quite sure he doesn't
check
with any shareholders before he dreams up some new piece of
race-mixing filth for MTV.
As for Gentile bankers telling the Jewish media bosses what kind of
propaganda they must produce for the public, that's total nonsense. I
haven't yet done a study of the investment banking industry to
determine what percentage of Jews and what percentage of Gentiles are
involved in it, but one thing that's certain is that the Gentile
bankers would faint dead away at the thought of telling Jewish media
bosses such as Michael Eisner or the Sulzberger family or the
Newhouses or Sumner Redstone to cut back on the race-mixing
propaganda. Gentile bankers as a class are rich, deracinated capons,
whose only interest is money.
Every Jewish propaganda medium -- CBS or MTV or Time magazine or the
New York Times -- is staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and they
all know what they're doing. They work as a tribe, as a swarm of
termites gnawing at the foundations of our existence. There is total
agreement among the media Jews as to the general thrust of their
propaganda. They may disagree on many of the details -- they may even
compete against each other for a bigger slice of the media pie -- but
all agree on the general goals of degrading and subverting Gentile
civilization, of corrupting Gentile institutions, of mongrelizing our
race. Again, the Jews work as a tribe, and that is the source of their
strength and their success.
Gentile bankers, on the other hand, work only for themselves. They
would not dream of combining and using their financial strength to
protect our people from the Jews. They are terrified of the Jews, of
the media. The more money they have, the more selfish and the more
cowardly they are. The huge difference, the decisive difference,
between the Jews and our people is that they work as a tribe, and we
work as individuals. They
work together, rich Jews and poor Jews, for their common tribal
interests, against us, and until now we have failed to organize
effectively to defend ourselves against them.
Anyway, my point is that their defense against my exposure of their
activities and their power over our government is orchestrated - that
is, they've all gotten together and decided what their defense will be
-- and it's a deliberate lie. As I continue to expose the destructive
activities of the Jewish media bosses, you will continue to hear them
and their apologists respond that they really don't have any power,
that it's the Gentile shareholders and the Gentile bankers who control
the media. A lot of dimwits will believe that lie. A lot of couch
potatoes, a lot of soccer moms, a lot of baseball fans, a lot of
lemmings, will
believe that it's not the Jew Sumner Redstone who deliberately uses
MTV to corrupt White teenagers; instead it's some cabal of Gentile
shareholders and Gentile bankers who tell him what to do, and Redstone
is only an employee who follows their orders.
I think it's time for us to orchestrate our exposure of the Jewish
media. I think it's about time for the public, lemmings and all, to
begin hearing a uniform charge against them, a uniform statement of
our opposition to them. How about this: The Jews are our misfortune.
That's simple, and it's true, and it's easy to remember. Repeat after
me: The
Jews are our misfortune. Let's use that statement. Let's let everyone
hear it. Let's impress it on everyone's consciousness: The Jews are
our misfortune.
Of course, when I say the Jews are our misfortune, I'm not talking
only about the Jewish media bosses. I'm not talking only about the
Jews at the top, such as Sumner Redstone and the Sulzbergers and
Michael Eisner and the others who formulate and direct the propaganda
line against Gentile society; I'm talking about the whole tribe, and I
believe that message comes across in the statement, the Jews are our
misfortune. Let me tell you what the standard lemming response will be
to that statement, the response that they have been taught and will
parrot back.
First, from the religious lemmings it will be something like this:
"Oh, no, the Jews aren't our misfortune, we owe everything to the
Jews. Don't you know that Jesus was a Jew and God was his father? That
makes God a Jew. We must do what the Jews tell us. They are God's
people." I'm sure that argument is embarrassing to some of the more
sophisticated
apologists for the Jews, but many Christian Fundamentalists use it,
and I've heard it often.
From the secular lemmings it will be more like: "Don't you know that
Freud and Einstein and Salk were Jews? We wouldn't have a space
program if it weren't for Einstein. We wouldn't have a cure for polio
if it weren't for Salk. The Jews are our fortune, not our misfortune."
Well, of course, our space program has practically nothing to do with
Einstein or his Jewishness. Gentile thinkers envisioned it and
pioneered both its theoretical basis and its practical development.
The German theoretician, Hermann Oberth, and the Russian, Konstantin
Tsiolkovsky, were two of the Gentiles who independently demonstrated
mathematically the feasibility of space travel in the early years of
the last century. The American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard and the
German Wernher von Braun designed actual rockets and built the
vehicles which were the precursors of today's space ships. Jews didn't
become involved until it became glamorous and profitable. And the
development of a polio vaccine hardly would have missed a beat if
Jonas Salk had gone into the garment business instead of medicine. He
was one of a team, and he got the credit for the work of others as
well as for his own work.
The reasons we hear these silly and groundless claims in the first
place about how much we owe the Jews -- the reasons are Jewish media
control and Jewish tribalism, Jewish support for their own. Freud was
given the enormous buildup he received for his theorizing about anal
personalities and penis envy and the like because he was a Jew, not
because of any genuine merit in his theorizing. Other Jewish writers
recognized him as one of their own and propelled him to a position of
undeserved authority, and his theories ultimately did an enormous
amount of damage to the development of our understanding of psychology
and mental disease. Einstein was a competent mathematical physicist,
but a great deal of the publicity he received was based on the fact
that he was a Jew rather than on the merits of his work. As in the
case of Salk, Jewish publicists gave Einstein credit for the work of
others as well as for his own work.
What we must do is look at the balance sheet. Is the damage done to
our race by Karl Marx and all of his Jewish followers in the communist
movement -- the selective murder of more than 30 million of the best
of our people in Europe during the past century -- offset by whatever
contributions Einstein and Salk and other Jews have made -- even if
they did everything their Jewish boosters claim for them? Certainly,
there have been many other Jews who were competent and creative
engineers and scientists besides Einstein and Salk. Not every clever
Jew became a lawyer or a scriptwriter or a pawn shop owner or a
middleman. Some became chemists or mathematicians or physicists. But
can all of them together make up for the mass murders Lazar Kaganovich
perpetrated
aginst the Ukrainians, for the rapes and murders of German civilians
instigated by Ilya Ehrenburg, for the Eastern European girls still
being forced into sexual slavery on a huge scale today by Israeli
slave dealers?
I think not. And I have not yet put on the balance sheet what the
Jewish masters of America's mass media have done and are doing to us.
What can possibly compensate White Americans for the deliberate,
malevolent corruption of our young people by just one Jewish gangster
like Sumner Redstone and his MTV? The race-mixing, culture-destroying,
hip-hop filth churned out by Sumner Redstone's MTV seven days a week
is the single most destructive influence in American life today. And
of course, Redstone doesn't produce this filth all by himself. He has
thousands of Jews working for him at every level, not only in MTV but
also in CBS and in Paramount Pictures and in all of his other media
properties.
And although MTV, targeting White teenagers as it does, may seem the
most blatantly and maliciously destructive of the Jewish media, it is
hardly much worse than some of the filth being poured into the minds
of the American public by Michael Eisner's Disney empire: especially
by its Miramax films division under the Weinstein brothers. The fact
that much of the entertainment produced by Eisner's Disney Company is
relatively nnocuous does not compensate for the fact that some of it
is pure poison. The poison is being introduced gradually, more and
more each year, and it is having its effect. When the Disney Company
was entirely a Gentile company a few years ago, its output of
ntertainment may sometimes have been excessively bland, but none of it
was poison designed to corrupt White Americans.
And what can possibly compensate on our balance sheet for what the
Jewish news media are doing in their deliberate, calculated distortion
of the picture of the world seen by the American public. It is a
picture which has been designed to confuse White Americans, to
undermine their self-confidence, to induce feelings of racial guilt in
them. Just one example: the systematic suppression of the news of
Black crimes against White people and the exaggeration of the news of
every White crime against non-Whites is not a fluke. It is done
routinely by all of the Jewish news media: by the New York Times, by
the Washington Post, by Time magazine and Newsweek magazine, by CNN
and ABC News and CBS News and NBC News and all the rest. And
interracial crime is just one issue. The relations between the sexes;
immigration; the foreign relations of the United States with the rest
of the world, especially in the Middle East; and a hundred other
important issues are similarly distorted in their portrayal by the
media. This deliberate distortion of the public's view of the world
has done irreparable damage to the American system of government and
to American society. And again: the distortion has been deliberate,
planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No number of funny
Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley
or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers can compensate
for this harm.
When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any
doubt: the Jews are our misfortune. It's way past time for us to
accept this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled
"anti-Semitic" for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these
fears which have been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass
media, and then to begin working to improve our fortunes.
waybackjack
wrote:
>
> The West is the White race.
And Islam is the sub-human race.
Yeah, we've been down this road before.
waybackjack
wrote:
>Support
HOMOSEXUALITY IN ISLAM
Islam has the effect of denying Muslim boys and girls the opportunity
to develop their sexuality in a normal, wholesome fashion. The public
mixing of sexes is prohibited by Islam although it may be tolerated by
the secular governments of most Muslim nations. Denied the opportunity
to have normal heterosexual experiences during adolescence and
frequently the victims of sexual abuse by male relatives while they
were growing up it is no wonder that Muslims are much more likely than
infidels to find romance and sexual gratification in homosexual
relationships. The following excerpt from a piece published in a gay
and lesbian publication gives one a notion of Muslim sexuality in
Saudi Arabia.
"Ibrahim bin Abdullah bin Ghaith, the head of the religious police
(the Committee for the Prevention of Vice and the Promotion of Virtue)
acknowledged, in unusually tempered language, that there are gay
Saudis, while also speaking of the need "to educate the young" about
this "vice". But he denied media reports that gay and lesbian
relationships were the norm in the strictly segregated schools and
colleges, that homosexuality "is spreading".
In an unprecedented two-page special investigation, the daily
newspaper Okaz said lesbianism was "endemic" among schoolgirls. It
justified the article with a saying of the Prophet's wife Ayeshathat
"there should be no shyness in religion". The article told of lesbian
sex in school lavatories, girls stigmatised after refusing the
advances of their fellow students, and teachers complaining that none
of the girls were willing to change their behaviour.
Mr Ghaith dismissed a suggestion that he should send his "enforcers"
to investigate. Armed with sticks, they routinely hunt down men and
women in public they suspect may not be directly related. "This
perversion is found in all countries," he told Okaz. "The number [of
homosexuals] here is small ..." That assessment is contradicted by
teachers and students who say that, in the absence of other outlets, a
"gay" subculture has inevitably flourished among youth.
"A particularly beautiful boy always gets top marks in the exams
because he's some teacher's favourite," said Mohammed, an English
teacher in a government high school in Riyadh. "On the other hand, I
know many older boys who deliberately flunked their final exams so
they can stay ... with their younger sweethearts."
Ahmed, 19, a student at a private college in Jeddah, said there was no
shame in having a boyfriend in his private high school. Although he
firmly rejected the label "gay", he admitted that he now has a
"special friend" in college, too. "It's those who don't have a boy who
are ashamed to admit it. We introduce our boy to our friends as 'al
walid hagi' [the boy who belongs to me]. At the beginning of term, we
always check out the new boys to see which are the most 'helu' [sweet]
and think of ways to get to know them."
Gay marriage is not the contemporary invention of decadent Western
civilization. The Egyptian city of Siwa has for centuries legitimized
and celebrated marriages between Muslim men. No other community has
done more to suppress heterosexual behavior thereby making
homosexuality the norm. A gay cruising guide to Siwa provides both
historical background and tips on finding gay sex partners in that
city -- truly a no-brainer. Gay marriage is also practiced in
Afghanistan. News reports documenting that fact and others about
rampant Afghan homosexuality can be found here. Paradoxical though it
may be, Islam calls for the severe punishment of homosexuality while
at the same time working diligently to make that forbidden practice
more attractive. An excellent analysis can be found here.
If you have a particular interest in the Islamic persecution of
homosexuals al-bab.com is a good place to pursue it further. As this
form of barbarity is inflicted on Muslims by Muslims and is relatively
rare I will not dwell on the matter much further. The overwhelming
majority of homosexuals who have been murdered by Muslims died because
they were infidels. Count the millions murdered and multiply by
whatever percentage incidence of homosexuality you fancy. You will get
a very, very large number in return.
waybackjack
wrote:
>
>The White Nationalist David Duke
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=165942007
Claim 11 men raped teenager in revenge
ETHAN MCNERN
ELEVEN Pakistani men have been accused of raping a teenager and
forcing her to parade naked through her village because a cousin
eloped with a young woman from the men's family, police said
yesterday.
Such attacks, known as honour crimes, as they are committed in
response to a perceived slight on a family's honour, are common in
predominantly Muslim Pakistan, especially in rural communities.
Police said the girl's father had filed a complaint on Saturday in
Ubaro town, 330 miles from Karachi, saying a group of 11 men had
kidnapped his daughter, raped her and forced her to parade naked.
The father told police the men were furious because the girl's cousin
had eloped with and married a young woman from their family.
The girl is in hospital in Ubaro, police said. Four of the 11 men
named in the complaint have been arrested and police are awaiting a
medical report to confirm the 16-year-old had been raped. Police also
said certain influential people were pressing the girl's father to
drop his complaint.
The case brings to mind an attack in 2002, when Mukhtaran Mai was
gang-raped on the orders of a traditional village council in Punjab
province as punishment because her brother had had a relationship with
a young woman without the approval of her family.
Ms Mai pressed charges and rose to international prominence as a
women's rights campaigner. The
case highlighted and helped galvanise public opinion behind a
government-backed change to Islamic laws, approved late last year,
that makes it easier for women to seek justice in civil courts.
Under the old Islamic law on rape, a woman risked prosecution for
adultery unless she could produce four male witnesses to a rape.
This article:
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=165942007
Topaz
"i am a radical muslim please read my blog, read how islam will win
the clash of civilization."
http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha
Topaz
The Culture War:
Israel Line - Friday, June 10, 2005
Thousands Participate in Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv.
Thousands of people took to the streets of Tel Aviv this
afternoon to participate in the city's annual gay pride parade,
HA'ARETZ reported. The parade set out from Rabin Square and was to end
in Yarkon Park, where musical performances were planned.
MKs Yosef Lapid (Shinui), Eitan Cabel (Labor) and Zehava Gal-On
(Yahad), as well as Tel Aviv Mayor Ron Huldai, were set to speak at
the event.
The chairman of the national Association of Gay Men, Lesbians,
Bisexuals and Transgender in Israel, Mike Hamel, said today the parade
was organized with the "close cooperation" of the Tel Aviv
municipality. "It's great to see it, and great that it's one of the
few places in the world that has the support of a municipal body, a
government body," he said.
Hamel said the event is called a "pride parade," because it has
to do with "being proud of the way we are and the demand to accept
every person as a person, as he is, and not trying to change him."
Full story:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/586950.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
- -- - -- -
Riyadh - Saudi authorities arrested 20 young men after raiding a
suspected gay wedding in the southern town of Jizan, a newspaper
reported on Wednesday.
The detainees, who were among some 400 men attending "the wedding
party of two men" on Tuesday, had been "emulating women," the Al-Watan
paper said.
In all, some 250 people were detained in the police raid on the party
but the rest were later released.
Police had "arrested the wanted people and released those who have
nothing to do with the matter," the paper quoted a police commander as
saying.
Some guests were also seen chewing qat, an illegal narcotic widely
used in neighbouring Yemen, on a hill above the square where the party
was being held, Al-Watan said.
Homosexuality is illegal in conservative Saudi Arabia, which metes out
strict punishments based on sharia, or Islamic law. - Sapa-AFP "
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
-
NEA, Gay Militants: Joined At The Hip
Lee Duigon
If a private citizen tells his neighbor's children that they ought to
try gay sex, he might wind up in a correctional facility. If he talks
that way to your 13-year-old son, you'll want him put away-pronto.
But when this very same behavior, toward the same children, is
displayed by adults who belong to America's biggest teachers' union,
most parents simply let them do it. In fact, they pay them to.
The NEA is committed to the cause of militant homosexuality. It's the
richest, most politically powerful union in America, and it has daily
access to most of America's children. And it wants to recruit them for
the homosexual lifestyle.
Lean this equation, America:
Public schools=The homosexual agenda
If you don't believe it, visit nea-glc.org/, the website of the
National Education Association's Gay and Lesbian Coalition. There,
among their "great achievements" in shaping NEA policy, the homosexual
militants cite the NEA's promotion of "the lesbian-gay-bisexual
curriculum" and "family life education... regarding the diversity of
sexual orientation."
The NEA has also campaigned for the proclamation of
"Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transsexual History Month" (try putting that on
a T-shirt), homosexual studies at Catholic colleges--and, of course,
homosexual "marriage."
The people of Massachusetts know the teachers' union's commitment to
"gay marriage." Aline Isaacson of GLSEN (Gay-Lesbian-Straight
Education Network), the media's favorite poster gal for "gay
marriage", is also--surprise!-a paid consultant to the Massachusetts
teachers' union. Paid in taxpayer dollars, to boot. (You may remember
Massachusetts GLSEN from a few years ago as the organizers of graphic,
intensely perverted sex "workshops" for public school children--a
scandal that came to be known as "fist-gate.")
Ms. Isaacson, according to the grass-roots Article 8 Alliance, these
days makes it a full-time job lobbying state legislators to keep them
from jumping ship on "gay marriage" and voting for the Bill of Address
which would remove the outlaw Supreme Judicial Court judges who
imposed this oxymoron on the people of Massachusetts. Supported by
taxpayers' money, she makes daily, face-to-face visits to individual
lawmakers. Nice work if you can get it.
Too bad you couldn't make it to the gym teachers' state convention in
New Jersey, in February. It wasn't about volleyball. For public school
gym teachers, Job One--according to the convention's floor displays,
handouts, posters, and workshop topics (all of which I saw
personally)--is getting the kids comfy with homosexuality. To this
end, they handed out a "resource guide"--handsomely produced, slick,
paid for largely by Fleet Bank
Inc.--intended for distribution in all the public schools. (For more
information, see my article, "Now It's the Gym Teachers," in the
February archive of the Chalcedon website, chalcedon.edu.)
You would have seen even more of the same at "Twenty Years of Great
Sex (Ed)" last year, a national conference of "sex educators" hosted
by Rutgers, New Jersey's taxpayer-funded state university. Again,
there was no effort to hide the educators' whole-hearted penchant for
homosexuality...
Topaz
Ian Buckley - Shamireaders June 19, 2005
Pound's biographer Professor Hugh Kenner - with whom I had the honour
of corresponding shortly before his death - considered that without
its poets the world would have already have long since succumbed to
total exhaustion.
More practically, perhaps, we can view religion as playing a similar
valuable role in preserving traditional societies, and maintaining
higher values than the almighty dollar. But not all faiths have 'what
it takes' to resist the trend towards a world turned into a counting
house on top of a rubbish dump.
Indeed, both Judaism and the Protestant variant of Christianity are
implicated, more or less, in the rise of capitalism. Additionally,
traditionalist Catholics believe that their Church is now a shadow of
its former state, having virtually self-destructed after Vatican II.
While Eastern Orthodoxy and even Japanese Shinto play their honourable
part in resisting the rush towards a porno-trash non-culture, it is
pre-eminently Islam that is the biggest stumbling block in the way of
the New World Order.
In the first place Islam is a profoundly and genuinely democratic
faith, as opposed to the 'democracy' of fakery and computerised
trickery that characterised the election of Bush and Bliar. Following
on from this, Muslims also hold true to economic democracy in the form
of the prohibition of usury. Though now abandoned, this was also once
a doctrine of the Christian Church. Such a fundamental point is, to
say the least, unappreciated by the false prophets of globalist
capitalism, always on the lookout for fresh lands to reduce to a bland
and hence profitable mass - or mess.
When Muslims, like those 'extremist' Iranians, reject the societies
(perhaps non-societies might be a better term) of Britain and the US,
are they really wrong to do so? Or are they just being sensible in not
wanting a taste of the growing gap between rich and poor, the drug
addiction, the sleaze, the corruption, the social breakdown, the urban
gun crime and trash TV that more and more characterises these two
countries today?
Significantly, terms such as Ummah and Dar-al-Islam are more or less
untranslatable, indicating a degree of cohesion and comradely
brotherhood that those outside the Arabic and Muslim world can barely
understand.
Though few of us realise it, we in the West are spoon-fed a bogus view
of reality: the truth only comes out in peripheral areas. Times,
Telegraph and Observer dribble on and on about the wonderful EU
constitution, or how we must 'democratise' Iraq1. However in the
travel sections of such papers you can still read the occasional
comment on the wonderful hospitality to be found in Libya or Syria, in
spite of everything that happened in recent years.
Apparently, tourists there can find themselves being invited, after a
passing acquaintance with a citizen of those 'evil' countries, to stay
and eat in private homes. Just try doing that in New York or London!
As Gavin Maxwell wrote of his stay in pre-Saddam and pre-American
Apocalypse Iraq :
'Throughout our journey I was struck by the boorishness of Western
hospitality by contrast with that of the Arabs. If a stranger rings a
doorbell in Europe, he must produce some very good reason before he
can get into the house at all, much less eat there as a guest; yet in
the lands where there are neither doors nor doorbells the stranger is
not asked the reason for his presence, and to hesitate in setting food
before him would be
shameful.'...
As is clear from the Last Sermon of the Last Prophet, true Islam has a
civilised attitude towards woman...:
'O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your
women, but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have
taken them as your wives only under Allah's trust and with His
permission. If they abide by your right then to them belongs the right
to be fed and clothed in kindness. Do treat your women well and be
kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers. And it
is your right that they do not make friends with any one of whom you
do not approve, as well as never to be unchaste. '...
America today, in line with its stultifying decay, hardly produces any
new contributors to the world of thought. Though scarcely comparable
to Mencken or Brooks Adams, the present-day philosophic duo of Beavis
and Butthead have it right: 'People are STUPID'.
Yes, people are stupid, especially modern Britons or Americans. They
are pleased to accept assessments of one of the world's great
religions from various self-interested parties with an axe to grind -
from tame professors run by the intelligence agencies, to
fundamentalist 'Christian' Zionist nutcases who want to bring on
Armageddon...
As for Muslims and Arabs in general, they can take some small comfort
from the words of Beregond, the soldier of Gondor, in Tolkien's Lord
of the Rings: 'We have this honour: ever we bear the brunt of the
chief hatred of the Enemy.'
waybackjack
wrote:
>Here is a Muslim's website:
Here are better Muslime websites:
waybackjack
wrote:
>Why is Islam so fucking nutty?
AN EX-MUSLIM SPEAKS
We watched in the months following 9/11, as Muslim-American groups
began to act as hindrances in the war on terror and the efforts of
Americans to defend themselves. We saw them ignore nearly every act
of Islamic terror that is committed each day, and instead publicize
obscure issues and personal slights against Muslims that are
absolutely trivial by comparison.
Far from accepting responsibility for Islamic terror, Muslims look for
reasons not to act or engage in introspection. Some even grasp onto
wild conspiracy theories that blame Americans for 9/11 - just as the
millions of Jihad victims over the centuries are in some way held
responsible for their own slaughter as well.
And finally, we came to realize that this extraordinary arrogance and
self-absorption on the part of the Muslim community, its inability
neither to empathize with others nor engage in the sort of
self-critique that leads to moral progress is in no way incidental to
the religion.
There is something deeply, deeply wrong with Islam.
Originally, we started this website in the naive hope that perhaps
Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence that is
committed in the name of their religion. Perhaps if they understood,
then they might be motivated to turn the critical eye inward and
resolve those far more important issues that leave so many lives in
agony and force the consumption of so many billions of dollars for
security resources.
But, in our first several years of posting attacks, we never once
heard from a Muslim who wrote to condemn the violence and resolve
themselves to combating it. Neither did we see any change on the part
of Muslim-American groups, or the other Islamic organizations across
the globe, even as the body count mounted to levels that far exceed
the damage done on 9/11.
And so, our mission is to present the truth about Islam and how it is
waybackjack
wrote:
>Gay Pride
MUSLIME OBSESSED WITH PORN
Porn dominates Saudi mobile use
Gender segregation is enforced strictly by the Saudi authorities
Up to 70% of files exchanged between Saudi teenagers' mobile phones
contain pornography, according to a study in the ultra-conservative
Muslim kingdom.
The study quoted in Arab News focussed on the phones of teenagers
detained by religious police for harassing girls.
The same researcher also found that 88% of girls say they have been
victims of harassment using Bluetooth technology.
Saudi Arabia has toughened penalties for misuse of mobile phones which
challenge its strict social traditions.
"The flash memory of mobile phones taken from teenagers showed 69.7%
of 1,470 files saved in them were pornographic and 8.6% were related
to violence," said report author Professor Abdullah al-Rasheed.
He presented his study at a seminar organised by the King Fahd
Security Academy, Arab News reports.
Public social contact between genders is banned in public in Saudi
Arabia, which enforces a strict interpretation of Islamic law and
morality.
But the spread of Bluetooth technology, allowing wireless connection
between mobile phones, has allowed for increased opportunities of
communication as well as abuse by predat
Topaz
"The ultimate cause of this terrorism stems from our involvement in
and
support of the criminal behavior of Israel.
TERROR IN RESPONSE TO TERROR
The Palestinians and many of their Arab allies have been the target of
a half century of unrelenting Israeli terrorism.
In the late 1940s the Zionists took over Palestine and drove out over
600,000 people from their homes through widespread acts of terrorism.
Among those events was the sadistic massacre of 254 Palestinian mostly
old men, women and children at Deir Yassin. After the bloodletting,
the Jews then purposely publicized the event so as to make the people
flee in panic from their homes and businesses from which they still
haven't been allowed to return.
Former Israel Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, boasted of the
importance of the massacre of Deir Yassin in his book The Revolt: The
Story of the Irgun. He wrote that there would not have been a State of
Israel without the "victory" of Deir Yassin. "The Haganah carried out
victorious attacks on other fronts... In a state of terror, the Arabs
fled, crying, 'Deir Yassin."
(1)
Nor did the massacres cease after the establishment of the Jewish
State; they continued in times of both peace and war. Following are
the names of some of them: Sharafat Massacre, Kibya Massacre, Kafr
Qasem Massacre, Al-Sammou' Massacre, the Sabra And Shatila Massacre,
Oyon Qara Massacre, Al-Aqsa Mosque Massacre, the Ibrahimi Mosque
Massacre, the Jabalia Massacre.
(2)
In a policy of ethnic cleansing, Israel continues to keep residents of
Palestine who were born there and whose families lived there for
countless generations, from returning home. At the same time, it gives
generous incentives for genetic Jews who never lived in Palestine to
immigrate from the far corners of the world.
The British also suffered greatly from Israeli terror, such as the
horrendous bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.
Israeli terror has not stopped since. Israel has more prisoners per
capita than any other nation of the world, more than Stalinist Russia
or Red China during its worst periods. It routinely tortures its
Palestinian prisoners, and is in fact the only nation in the modern
world that legally sanctions torture. In fact, a Jewish human rights
group in Israel confirmed in a 60-page report that 85% of Palestinian
detainees undergo torture while in
custody.(3) Even a major New York Times article by the Jewish Joel
Greenburg, stated matter-of-factly that Israel tortures 500 to 600
Palestinians every month
.(4)
Israel has targeted and assassinated thousands of Palestinian leaders,
and this includes scholars, clerics, businessmen, philosophers and
poets, anyone who inspires the Palestinian people to patriotism. These
assassinations have occurred all over the world, even in the United
States. In the process they have killed many thousands of women and
children. They have even repeatedly bombed Palestinian refugee camps
packed with women and children.
Not only did they establish their Israeli state over Palestinian land,
(in 1948 Palestinians personally owned over 90 percent of it) the Jews
took almost all of the Palestinian personal property: the land, farms,
homes and businesses. After they drove out the Palestinian refugees
and refused their return, they then passed an "abandoned property" law
that confiscated Palestinian property and gave to the Jews. The law
even has the chutzpah to forbid ever selling any of their stolen land
to Palestinians. (5)
In 1982 Israel invaded Lebanon. During their invasion and 18 year
occupation an estimated 40,000 civilians died. Israel relentlessly
bombed and attacked cities and villages and also many hospitals and
orphanages (as documented by the Norwegian Red Cross) and devastated
the ancient and once beautiful city of Beirut.
The current Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, doesn't dare even
step foot in Belgium or the Netherlands, fearing an indictment of the
World Court for war crimes. Sharon is responsible for the murder of
two thousand of refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps in Lebanon.
Israel shot down a Libyan passenger airliner over the Sinai Peninsula
killing 111 people.
And it is has not just been the Palestinians who have suffered from
Israeli terror.
ZIONIST TERROR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
Americans have also suffered from Zionist terror. In fact, Israel has
committed a number of acts of war against the United States.
Israel has a long record of terrorism against the United States going
all the way back to 1954. In that year, the Israel government plotted
to blow up American installations in Cairo and Alexandria and blame it
on Egyptian nationals. By chance the plot failed and was uncovered. It
was named the Lavon Affair after the man who supposedly set up the
terrorism, Pinhas Lavon, the Israeli Defense Chief. He resigned in
1955 over the incident. (6)
In 1967, Israel purposefully attacked with unmarked jet fighters and
torpedo boats, the U.S.S. Liberty, an American Navy vessel of the
Sinai Peninsula, even machine gunning the deployed life rafts of the
ship. The attack killed 31 American servicemen and wounded over
170.(7) They sought to sink the ship, kill all the Americans and
blame it on the Egyptians so they could have American support to
conquer larger areas of the Arab world.
The attack on the Liberty was nothing short of a vicious act of war
against the United States by Israel. In spite of the fact that U.S.
Secretary of State Dean Rusk and navy chief Admiral Moorer said that
the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel was deliberate. The
all-powerful Zionist Lobby prevented a formal Congressional
investigation. If the Lobby can even cover up horrendous Israeli
crimes against America, it's no wonder they can cover
up Israel's endless crimes against the Palestinians. Yet, after the
Liberty attack America didn't even reduce our billions of dollars of
aid, in fact the story quickly vanished from the news after a few
short days.
In 1986 Israel actually caused us to wrongly go to war and militarily
attack another nation. The Mossad planted a transmitter in Tripoli,
Libya and then broadcast terrorist messages in Libyan code indicating
Libyan responsibility for killing two Americans in the bombing of the
La Belle discothèque in Germany.(8) (It was later proven that Libya
had nothing to do with the bombing) By use of this fraud, Israel
induced the American bombing of Libya. American bombs wrecked havoc
there. One of those killed was the infant daughter of the Libyan
President. It is certainly a dastardly act of war against a nation to
induce it into wrongly attacking another nation. Only a truly evil
enemy of America would do such a thing.
Every Palestinian and Arab is aware that Israel's half century of
terror could never have occurred without the active financial,
military, and diplomatic support of the United States. They know that
the Jewish Lobby has control of American Mideast Policy and the
Zionists can get whatever they want from Congress on issues important
to them.
It was American support of Israel's brutal invasion and occupation of
Lebanon in the 1980s that led directly to the bombing of the U.S.
Marine contingent, killing 300 American young men.
THE INVOLVEMENT OF AMERICAN IN ISRAELI CRIMES
Arabs know that almost every bomb that kills their people comes from
America, Every bullet, every tank, and every fighter plane, is
manufactured or paid for by American dollars. It is America's billions
of dollars of support that have enabled the Jewish state to terrorize
the Arab people for half a century.
Even though Israel invaded Lebanon and killed thousands of civilians,
America never threatened to bomb Tel Aviv (as it did Iraq) if Israel
refused to obey UN resolutions to withdraw. A comparison of America's
reaction to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait to that of Israel's invasion of
Lebanon is instructive.
America's one-sided policy foreign policy can be illustrated by the
different treatment afforded Israel and Iraq:
1. Iraq invaded Kuwait. Israel invaded Lebanon.
2. Perhaps 3000 Kuwait civilians died in the initial war with Iraq.
40,000
Lebanese died from the time of the invasion through the occupation.
3. Iraq disobeyed UN resolutions to leave Kuwait. Israel disobeyed UN
resolutions to leave Lebanon. (for 18 years)
4. Iraq broke international conventions on chemical, biological and
nuclear
weapons. Yet Israel is a far greater offender, having one of the
greatest stores
of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons in the world
5. Iraq refused UN inspections. Israel has always refused UN
inspection.
6. For these violations we bombed Iraq. In response to Israel's
crimes, America just
continued to send more billions of dollars.
American foreign policy was and continues to be Israeli policy. Israel
was not threatened with even a cutoff of U.S. aid as thousands of
Lebanese civilians died from the Israeli actions. Iraq was once a
friend of America with whom we bought oil and did much business.
America actually supported Saddam Hussein and Iraq's war with Iran.
Iraq did nothing against the United States, but it made the mistake of
becoming a strong enemy of Israel. So the Jewish and the
Jewish-controlled gentile bureaucrats, and Jewish-dominated
media quickly made our former friend, Saddam Hussein, into our
archenemy.
We dropped more explosives on Iraq country in a few weeks than we had
in the whole of the Second World War. We killed hundreds of thousands
of Iraqis including tens of thousands of civilians. Then we engaged in
a blockade and embargo of Iraq that even the anti-Iraq United Nations
says led to the deaths of at least 1,200,000 children and hundreds of
thousands of elderly. Let those Americans who don't understand the why
of this terrorism concentrate on this shocking fact. One million, two
hundred thousand
children have died as a direct result of our policy toward Iraq.
The Jewish Lobby and the Jewish-dominated media are very careful not
to let the American people fully understand the real reason for the
Iraqi war or the true issues in the Palestinian question. They really
don't want Americans to know why so many millions in the Arab world
hate us and why the number grows larger every day.
They don't want us to know the real reasons why Americans are so hated
- because it is the Jewish bosses of American foreign policy who are
the one's responsible for this growing hatred of America. Imagine the
anger and feelings of despair that would drive men to sacrifice their
own lives to get at us.
The Zionist bosses know that by America's supporting the criminal
policies of Israel spawns hatred against America. They are certainly
aware that bombing and going to war against nations solely for
Israel's benefit creates dedicated and fanatical enemies against
America, enemies who will seek revenge in American blood.
Of course, they never put America's interests first; their own Jewish
interests are always paramount. In actuality, they are fully aware
that the brutal and stupid acts of terror that recently happened in
New York and Washington only help the Zionist cause by engendering
enormous American anger at Israeli enemies, and make Americans more
easily manipulated to do the bidding of Israel.
Think about who really gained from this terror. Have the Palestinians
benefited? This terrorist act destroyed all the progress the
Palestinians have recently made with world opinion. It has blinded the
world to Israeli terrorism. Israel is the only winner in this tragedy.
They will now have a green light to do anything they want against the
Palestinians. They can kill any of their foes whether they are violent
or non-violent. They will get all the money they want from the
American people, and no one will be thinking
about their on-going suppression, murder and human rights violations
against the Palestinian people.
No, the Zionists are the only benefactors of the horrendous day of
terror on September 11, 2001. Ironic isn't it, that although Zionist
criminal actions led to this terror, only the Zionists will benefit
from it. Of course, they reason they benefit because the American mass
media is completely in their hands and it will never ask the proper
questions of why these horrendous events are happening. Unfortunately,
too few people will ever hear voices such as mine who dare to
challenge the Zionist lies.
That's why we are in this mess, because a foreign power has become the
most powerful lobby in the American government and controls the
direction of the mass communication media in America.
Let me repeat that one more time. The primary reason we are suffering
from terrorism in the United States today is because our government
policy is completely subordinated to a foreign power: Israel and the
efforts of world-wide Jewish Supremacism.
American Flags are flying everywhere in America in the aftermath of
the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That is good,
for we need to be more patriotic. If we were more patriotic for the
real interests of America rather than for Israel, we would not now
suffer from terrorism.
And truly, what could be more patriotic than wanting our own country
to be led by our own people in the service of America; not a foreign
power or a powerful minority.
Yes, we must fight tooth and nail against any terrorists who attack
our country. But, we must understand why this terror is occurring, and
how it has been spawned. It has occurred because of long-standing
treason against the United States and her people.
WHAT HAS ZIONISM COST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
The Jewish Lobby and media power has cost the United States about 6
billion dollars a year in foreign aid and weapons, almost one third of
America's entire foreign aid budget during the last half century and
as much money spent in America's drug war.
It has poisoned our relations with the oil-rich Mideast nations. In
response to our policies, the Arabs came together and developed their
"oil weapon" which has cost Americans at least ten at least ten
trillion dollars in higher oil costs.
It has alienated the entire Arab world, leading to destruction or
confiscation of billions of dollars of American property in those
countries, kidnapping of American citizens, and generated enormous
hatred for the American people.
How has Israel has paid us back for our support? They have
continually spied on us on us (the Jonathan Pollard Case), sold our
highest secrets (such as to the biggest nucleur threat to us currently
in the world: the Communist Chinese) and stolen our enriched uranium
for their illegal nucleur weapons.
They have launched terrorist attacks against the United States such as
the Lavon Affair and the Attack on the USS Liberty. Both these acts
were nothing short of vicious acts of war against the United States.
Providing false information for America to wrongly go to war against
another country is also nothing less than an Israeli act of war
against the United States. Yet, in response to these despicable
actions against America, our Zionist controlled leaders did not even
reduce our billions of dollars of financial and military aid to
Israel. We give Israel about 6 billion dollars in aid each year, that
is more than all the nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean and
South America.
What is the latest cost of our subservience to the criminal actions of
Zionism? The latest price we have paid is the horrendous acts of
terrorism on September 11, 2001.
The powerful agents of Israel in American media and government are
ultimately responsible for this terror against the United States just
as surely as if they themselves had piloted those planes into the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
And now they cynically plan to use the terror that they themselves
created to increase the cycle of violence against Israel's enemies.
You can be sure that the Zionist powers plan to do far more than
simply punish the perpetrators of these events. America will once
again be used to strike against whomever Israel wants.
An indiscriminate or intemperate response from America would
ultimately produce even more hatred against America, and bring more
terroristic acts upon the heads of American people. The increasing
cycle of hatred is exactly want the Zionists want, for their aim that
we will fight Israel's enemies for them, spilling our blood instead of
theirs. They are only ones who truly benefit from America's pain.
Rather than Israel, we will pay the
ultimate price.
Unless we heal the wounds and give America a better course, every new
missile and bomb we send will come back to us again. Every life we
take in foreign lands will result in more American lives lost here and
abroad. America will sink more and more into uncertainty and fear.
We must have cool heads now and break this cycle of violence.
Many traitors in our government have supported Zionism's criminal
activities rather than the true interests of the American people. They
have spawned the hatred that drove these terrible acts. Unless their
power is broken Americans will be haunted by an increasing specter of
terrorism.
Let us pray for the American victims of these events and for their
suffering families. Let us swiftly and harshly punish the perpetrators
of these dastardly acts.
But, even more importantly, let us understand why these events
occurred and how we can heal the hatred against our nation.
Once we understand the reason why, then we will all agree on the sure
way to prevent such terroristic acts in the future.
The solution to this huge problem is extremely obvious and it is very
simple.
America must heed the farewell address of the Father of our Country
and "avoid foreign entanglements."
And we must always put America and the American People first."
David Duke
September 15, 2001
www.Davidduke.com
FOOTNOTES
1. Begin, M. (1964). The Revolt: The Story Of The Irgun. Tel-Aviv:
Hadar
Pub. p.162.
2. Erlich, G. (1992). Not Only Deir Yassin. Hebrew Daily Ha'ir. May
6.
3. Sami Sockol, Moshe Reinfeld (1998) May 20. the Israeli daily,
Ha'aretz
4. Joel Greenberg (1993) Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs
Aug. 14
New York Times
5. Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws Of The State Of Israel. New
York.
p.156.
6. Bar-Joseph, Uri (1995)Intelligence Intervention in the Politics
of
Democratic States: The United States, Israel, and Britain. University
Park,
PA: Penn State Press,
7. Ennes, J. (1979). Assault On The Liberty. New York: Random
House.
8. Ostrovsky, Victor. (1995) The Other Side of Deception: A Rogue
Agent
Exposes the Mossad's
Secret Agenda. New York: Harper
9. See the chapter on media control in my book, My Awakening. Also
available at Davidduke.com
10. Bill Gertz (1993) Washington Times and Michael R. Gordon, New
York
Times Oct.13
11. A & L Cockburn (1991) Dangerous Liaison
Topaz
"i am a radical muslim please read my blog, read how islam will win
the clash of civilization."
http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
waybackjack
wrote:
>Here is a Muslim's website:
>
>"i am a radical muslim please read my blog, read how islam will win
>the clash of civilization."
Here are two better websites that expose Islamites for the filthy
primitives that they are:
waybackjack
wrote:
>
>"The ultimate cause of this terrorism
is that people refuse to convert to Islam.
Of course, even if you infidels *do* convert to Islam, the terrorism
will continue within Islam as we merrily try to kill each other .....
not to mention our wives and daughters.
Topaz
Let's Talk about Jews and Elections
By Curt Maynard
I'll make this short. Jews dominate the media period. This is not an
anti-Semitic canard, a false accusation, a bigoted remark, or an
uninformed opinion. This is an empirical fact. For those out there
still in doubt, please read "who rules America."[1] Deconstruct and
prove the article wrong if you can, I encourage you to; it will only
reinforce the fact in your mind once you realize it's true. I've been
accused of anti-Semitism by many different people for refusing to omit
the fact that Jews dominate the media in my writings, some people say
I should be blaming Zionists, not Jews, but the fact of the matter is,
I don't know whether or not all of the Jewish owners and CEO's of the
major networks are Zionists, but I do know they are ethnic Jews. I've
been accused of racism [nee white supremacism] for saying that blacks
commit more than 50% of the murders every year in the United States,
despite the fact that United States Department of Justice statistics
prove the same. In other words, I am accused of anti-Semitism and
racism for writing the truth. So be it, if telling the truth means
that I am a racist and an anti-Semite, I can live with that.
France has a population of sixty million. According to the Jewish
Virtual Library,[2] France's Jewish population is less that 500,000,
meaning that Jews compose less than 1% of the French population.
Despite this fact, a Jew, Nicolas Sarkozy is now France's President.
His opponent in last week's election, Segolene Royal, is the "life
partner" [meaning unmarried anywhere else] of the Jewish Francois
Hollande, leader of France's socialist party. To break it down simply,
despite the fact that Jews compose less than 1% of the French
population, a Jew and a woman married to a Jew composed 100% of the
candidates France had to choose from in regards to the final
Presidential election. In any case, Sarkozy's win is being celebrated
by Jews worldwide.[3]
Oh come on Maynard, it's just a coincidence, right? Wrong! In the 2004
US Presidential election, the very same unlikely sampling manifested
itself among Democratic candidates - pay attention - this is
important. The only real viable choices for Democrats in the 2004
Primary elections were the following:
Howard Dean [Married to a Jewish woman, Judith Steinberg, his children
are being raised Jewish.[4]]
John Kerry [Entered the race claiming to be a Catholic until it was
revealed that he's actually Jewish, a "surprise" according to Kerry,
but nonetheless a FACT]
Wesley Clark [Jewish according Wikipedia.[5] Clark actually addressed
a Jewish group during the election stating "I am the oldest son, of
the oldest son, of the oldest son-at least five generations, and they
were all rabbis."[6]]
Joe Lieberman [Orthodox Jew][7]
What this means is that 100% of the viable Democratic candidates in
the 2004 primary were either Jewish or in the case of Dean, married to
a Jew. Now wait, it gets worse.
On the Republican side there was never any doubt that Bush would
retain the party's endorsement. Few would argue today that George Bush
is without any doubt, the most Philo-Semitic president in this
country's history. Bush has cast aside American sovereignty by stating
publicly that he, and therefore the United States [you and I] will
back Israel under any circumstances in a mid East war. Bush's
administration has placed more ethnic Jews in highly sensitive
positions than any other President in American history, with the
possible exception of Clinton, who by the way endorsed another
crypto-Jew named Madeleine Albright, who hid her Jewish ancestry[8] in
exactly the same way John Kerry and George Allen[9] did. Albright of
course was once the Secretary of State where she predictably coddled
Israel and did her best to suppress the extent of Israeli crimes
committed during the Clinton years.
In regards to Bush and the number of Jews he has appointed to high
positions within his administration - see here.[10] Of note is Michael
Chertoff, who has what amounts to one of the most powerful positions
in the US government today, he is the Director of Homeland
Security,[11] an assignment that places him in a position to do just
about anything he likes and then to effectively cover it all up.
Chertoff was the primary force behind the illegal arrest, and
unconstitutional detention and rendition of the world's foremost
political prisoner today, Ernst Zundel.[12] Chertoff is of course
Jewish and a dual citizen of Israel.
George Allen was once considered to be one of the strongest Republican
candidates[13] for the 2008 Presidential run; that is until it was
revealed that he too is a Jew pretending to be something else - see
how Allen responded to a reporter that asked him about his Jewish
ancestry - talk about angry][14] Why was Allen so angry? Did the
reporter reveal something that ruined years and years of careful
orchestration? I think so.
The point of writing this short article is to highlight the very
unusual fact that ethnic Jews are over-represented by tens of
thousands of times in positions of political importance in the United
States. Consider that they represent only 2.5% of the United States
population and you'll understand how it is that I find their
disproportionate representation in Presidential primaries highly
unlikely. All of us have been thoroughly indoctrinated with the idea
that Jews are indeed special and highly ambitious and this is supposed
to explain their large showings in politics, academia, sciences, the
media, etc. I personally think it far more likely that a Jewish
stranglehold on OUR media better explains these discrepancies, I am
not particularly impressed by their alleged abilities, after all, look
around you; is the world really a better place with Jews at the helm?
In the beginning of this article I noted the fact that France now has
a Jewish President. I did this solely to point out in the end, that
this phenomenon is not isolated to America, it has plagued Europe for
decades and is the real reason Europe has passed draconian "hate
crime" and "hate speech" legislation which has resulted in the
imprisonment of thousands of European patriots. Jewish politicians are
the primary force behind the passage of these laws, just as they are
in the United States. These Jews hide behind the cloak of other
minorities by using them as if they were the crux of concern, but in
fact, these laws are designed for no other reason than to prevent
exposure and criticism of ethnic Jews and their Supremacist
policies/agenda.
Consider the words of Patrick Grimm, noted Internet author, webmaster
of Zionist Watch and political dissident as he comments on an excerpt
from the Protocols that cannot be conveniently explained away with
cries of anti-Semitism and bigotry: "Below is just one excerpt from
the Protocols that will illustrate to you just how well the Jewish
laid plans are progressing along their dire course, the consequences
for the rest of us be damned. Oh, but I suppose all the little Jewish
civil rights groups would simply label these truths as a "canard", one
of their favorite terminologies that they fetch from the bag of tricks
when someone turns the heat up. No, it would probably be a "blood
libel" as every other foray and examination of Jewish wrongdoing is
conveniently named. To read the entire disgusting Zionistic display
simply go HERE (and I do advise doing that). Well, here is the excerpt
promised":[15]
WE CONTROL THE PRESS
NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR
CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all
news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are
focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be
already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate
to them.
If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of
the GOY communities to such an extent that they all come near looking
upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those
spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already now there is
not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance
into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets: what will our positions
be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in
the person of our king of all the world ....
Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS. Every one
desirous of being a publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged
to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefore, which, in
case of any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures
THE INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE HANDS
OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE MASS OF THE NATION
TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE BLESSINGS OF
PROGRESS. Is there any one of us who does not know that these phantom
blessings are the direct roads to foolish imaginings which give birth
to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority,
because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has introduced the
conception of every kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish
its limits .... All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in
fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after
phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that is,
into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest...."
Grimm concludes with the following:
"There it is, folks. The 'We Control the Press' dictate has already
been achieved. In fact, it is now axiomatic that media is a Jewish
domain. Their control of our thoughts and "ways of thinking" is a
foregone conclusion. When they state "If already now we have contrived
to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an
extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world
through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride
their noses," we can now safely proclaim "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" for
our Jewish kings, lords and masters! Most Americans see events,
people, places and things through Jewish eyes and think "Jewishly" in
ways that are probably more subconscious than explicit."[16]
Wake up America, you are being deceived!
http://pcapostate.blogspot.com/2007/05/lets-talk-about-jews-and-elections.h=
tml
Topaz
America were not ruled by the Jews it wouldn't have a problem with
Muslims.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>There is no need to look at Jew bootlicking sites.
These are ex-muslim sites:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.islam-watch.org/index.html
> The fact is that if
>America were not ruled by the Jews it wouldn't have a problem with
>Muslims.
Then why are Muslims killing Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, atheists
all over the world?
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>
>Let's Talk about Jews and Elections
No, let's focus on the REAL problem:
THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM... SAYING OTHERWISE DOES NOT NEGATE THAT FACT.
SENSE OF UMMAH
The Trouble With Islam
Sadly, mainstream Muslim teaching accepts and promotes violence.
BY TAWFIK HAMID
Tuesday, April 3, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT
Not many years ago the brilliant Orientalist, Bernard Lewis, published
a short history of the Islamic world's decline, entitled "What Went
Wrong?" Astonishingly, there was, among many Western "progressives," a
vocal dislike for the title. It is a false premise, these critics
protested. They ignored Mr. Lewis's implicit statement that things
have been, or could be, right.
But indeed, there is much that is clearly wrong with the Islamic
world. Women are stoned to death and undergo clitorectomies. Gays hang
from the gallows under the approving eyes of the proponents of
Shariah, the legal code of Islam. Sunni and Shia massacre each other
daily in Iraq. Palestinian mothers teach 3-year-old boys and girls the
ideal of martyrdom. One would expect the orthodox Islamic
establishment to evade or dismiss these complaints, but less happily,
the non-Muslim priests of enlightenment in the West have come,
actively and passively, to the Islamists' defense.
These "progressives" frequently cite the need to examine "root
causes." In this they are correct: Terrorism is only the manifestation
of a disease and not the disease itself. But the root-causes are quite
different from what they think. As a former member of Jemaah Islamiya,
a group led by al Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, I know
firsthand that the inhumane teaching in Islamist ideology can
transform a young, benevolent mind into that of a terrorist. Without
confronting the ideological roots of radical Islam it will be
impossible to combat it. While there are many ideological "rootlets"
of Islamism, the main tap root has a name--Salafism, or Salafi Islam,
a violent, ultra-conservative version of the religion.
It is vital to grasp that traditional and even mainstream Islamic
teaching accepts and promotes violence. Shariah, for example, allows
apostates to be killed, permits beating women to discipline them,
seeks to subjugate non-Muslims to Islam as dhimmis and justifies
declaring war to do so. It exhorts good Muslims to exterminate the
Jews before the "end of days." The near deafening silence of the
Muslim majority against these barbaric practices is evidence enough
that there is something fundamentally wrong.
The grave predicament we face in the Islamic world is the virtual lack
of approved, theologically rigorous interpretations of Islam that
clearly challenge the abusive aspects of Shariah. Unlike Salafism,
more liberal branches of Islam, such as Sufism, typically do not
provide the essential theological base to nullify the cruel
proclamations of their Salafist counterparts. And so, for more than 20
years I have been developing and working to establish a
theologically-rigorous Islam that teaches peace.
Yet it is ironic and discouraging that many non-Muslim, Western
intellectuals--who unceasingly claim to support human rights--have
become obstacles to reforming Islam. Political correctness among
Westerners obstructs unambiguous criticism of Shariah's inhumanity.
They find socioeconomic or political excuses for Islamist terrorism
such as poverty, colonialism, discrimination or the existence of
Israel. What incentive is there for Muslims to demand reform when
Western "progressives" pave the way for Islamist barbarity? Indeed, if
the problem is not one of religious beliefs, it leaves one to wonder
why Christians who live among Muslims under identical circumstances
refrain from contributing to wide-scale, systematic campaigns of
terror.
Politicians and scholars in the West have taken up the chant that
Islamic extremism is caused by the Arab-Israeli conflict. This
analysis cannot convince any rational person that the Islamist murder
of over 150,000 innocent people in Algeria--which happened in the last
few decades--or their slaying of hundreds of Buddhists in Thailand, or
the brutal violence between Sunni and Shia in Iraq could have anything
to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Western feminists duly fight in their home countries for equal pay and
opportunity, but seemingly ignore, under a façade of cultural
relativism, that large numbers of women in the Islamic world live
under threat of beating, execution and genital mutilation, or cannot
vote, drive cars and dress as they please.
The tendency of many Westerners to restrict themselves to
self-criticism further obstructs reformation in Islam. Americans
demonstrate against the war in Iraq, yet decline to demonstrate
against the terrorists who kidnap innocent people and behead them.
Similarly, after the Madrid train bombings, millions of Spanish
citizens demonstrated against their separatist organization, ETA. But
once the demonstrators realized that Muslims were behind the terror
attacks they suspended the demonstrations. This example sent a message
to radical Islamists to continue their violent methods.
Western appeasement of their Muslim communities has exacerbated the
problem. During the four-month period after the publication of the
Muhammad cartoons in a Danish magazine, there were comparatively few
violent demonstrations by Muslims. Within a few days of the Danish
magazine's formal apology, riots erupted throughout the world. The
apology had been perceived by Islamists as weakness and concession.
Worst of all, perhaps, is the anti-Americanism among many Westerners.
It is a resentment so strong, so deep-seated, so rooted in personal
identity, that it has led many, consciously or unconsciously, to
morally support America's enemies.
Progressives need to realize that radical Islam is based on an
antiliberal system. They need to awaken to the inhumane policies and
practices of Islamists around the world. They need to realize that
Islamism spells the death of liberal values. And they must not take
for granted the respect for human rights and dignity that we
experience in America, and indeed, the West, today.
Well-meaning interfaith dialogues with Muslims have largely been
fruitless. Participants must demand--but so far haven't--that Muslim
organizations and scholars specifically and unambiguously denounce
violent Salafi components in their mosques and in the media. Muslims
who do not vocally oppose brutal Shariah decrees should not be
considered "moderates."
All of this makes the efforts of Muslim reformers more difficult. When
Westerners make politically-correct excuses for Islamism, it actually
endangers the lives of reformers and in many cases has the effect of
suppressing their voices.
Tolerance does not mean toleration of atrocities under the umbrella of
relativism. It is time for all of us in the free world to face the
reality of Salafi Islam or the reality of radical Islam will continue
to face us.
Topaz
>No, let's focus on the REAL problem:
>
>THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM... SAYING OTHERWISE DOES NOT NEGATE THAT FACT.
If America were not ruled by Jews it wouldn't have a problem with
Islam. The main problem is that Jews control the media.
> Gays hang
>from the gallows under the approving eyes of the proponents of
>Shariah, the legal code of Islam.
"Now I'll tell you about another case involving murder and
homosexuals that I'm certain you haven't heard about, unless you
happen to live in northwestern Arkansas and you read the newspapers
there carefully. Less than three weeks ago, on September 26, two adult
homosexuals in the town of Rogers, Arkansas, grabbed a 13-year-old boy
off the street, took him to their apartment, drugged him, and tied him
up and gagged him so that no one could hear his screams, and then they
raped him to death. His body was found in a pool of blood on the
apartment floor.
The 13-year-old boy was Jesse Dirkhising. That's D-i-r-k-h-i-s-i-n-g.
The two adult homosexuals are Davis Don Carpenter and Joshua Macave
Brown, each charged with capital murder and six counts of forcible
rape. I mention these names to help you search for information about
this
horrible crime on the Internet, so that you can verify for yourself
what I'm telling you. Try the Internet site of The Morning News of
Northwestern Arkansas, the local newspaper there, which has been
virtually the only newspaper to carry news of the murder.
As I said, this vicious rape and murder of an innocent child by two
adult homosexuals occurred less than three weeks ago, and it's been
totally blacked out of the national news, while the beating death of
homosexual Matthew Shepard, who made the mistake of looking for a date
in the wrong bar, is still receiving national news coverage every day
more than a year after it happened.
Why? I'll tell you. It's because other groups in this country want it
this way. No individual in America has the power to black out the news
of the homosexual rape and murder of 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising. And
no individual has the power to give the enormous, non-stop national
coverage to the beating of Matthew Shepard that we are seeing. This
is the result of a collective decision--a racial decision--by the jews
who control the news media in America. The message the jews want to
send to White Americans is that homosexuals are innocent victims and
heterosexual White males are aggressors who prey on them. And so they
give us the news which fits that message, and they black out the news
which doesn't.
I mean, really, think about it. Which is the more newsworthy crime:
the beating to death of Matthew Shepard by two men he approached for a
date; or the kidnaping and raping to death of 13-year-old Jesse
Dirkhising by two adult homosexuals? The jews do this manipulation and
distortion of the news for a reason: a collective reason, a racial
reason. And it's working. Idiot White women and idiot White Christians
are joining the homosexuals around the country in even more
candlelight vigils in memory of Matthew Shepard. But there will never
be a candlelight vigil for Jesse Dirkhising. No one will ever hear
about Jesse Dirkhising--except those of you reading this now."
Ed Kadach
Topaz
They could show stories of Jeffrey Dahmer and of other White people
and they could have a lot of stories. They could fail tell you about
all the Blacks crimes, (which they do, the excuse being it would be
"controversial"). They could easily paint a very dark picture of White
people.
But they would especially want to show cases of Whites trying to
"take over", which is what we are trying to do. All the former White
nations have White nationalists who want a White nation. You could
list every one of them and say that Whites are trying to "take over".
And we are.
White nationalists break very few laws. When one of us does, it gets
front page news and the public TV watchers think White nationalists
are criminals. That is just one example. And why does it get front
page news? Is it because of the Muslims or because of the Jews?
But, you may object, the Muslims do a lot more terrorism than White
Nationalists. True, but they have a lot more people. They have
millions of people. How many do we have? We may have gotten a lot of
votes in France for example, but there isn't nearly as many White
activists as Muslim activists.
And why are White nationalists so law abiding? Is it because we
think revolution is wrong in principle and the Jewish controlled
government does not deserve to be overthrown? Not at all. We reject
revolution simply because it would fail and we would all be arrested.
The point is that the biggest enemies of White people are at the
top. True, we wouldn't want to be in a dark alley at night in a Black
neighborhood. But this alley is not where our powerful enemies are.
Our powerful enemies are running the TV stations and putting their
puppets in the White house. Our powerful enemies are the Jews.
waybackjack
wrote:
> Suppose the media was out to get White people, (as if they are not).
Muslims are out to get white people too .... and black people, brown
people, yellow people, red people.
Face it, muslims are sub-human slime
waybackjack
wrote:
> If America were not ruled by Jews it wouldn't have a problem with
>Islam. The main problem is that Jews control the media.
Gee. I wonder what the Muslim excuse if for killing Hindus, Buddhists,
Topaz
Let's Talk about Jews and Elections
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
Topaz
"The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and,
with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast
policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners
and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you're
going to find in the population. By national impact media I am
referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and
Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the
International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS' Mr. (William) Paley's
Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there's a Leonard
Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and
Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!
You go down the line in that fashion...not just with ownership but go
down to the managing posts and discretionary posts... and you'll find
that through their aggressiveness and their inventiveness, they now
dominate the news media. Not only in the media, but in academic
communities, the financial communities, in the foundations, in all
sorts of highly visible and influential services that involve the
public, they now have a tremendous voice.
Our policy in the Middle East in my judgment is disastrous, because
it's not even handed. I see no reason why nearly half the foreign aid
this nation has to give goes to Israel, except for the influence of
this Zionist lobby. I think the power of the news media is in the
hands of a few people...it's not subject to control of the voters,
it's subject only to the whim of the board of directors." (Former Vice
President Spiro Agnew)
Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
1st Statement:
"We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence on our
press, radio, and motion pictures. It may become very serious.
(Fulton) Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising
firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual
System if a certain feature was permitted to go on the air. The threat
was powerful enough to have the feature removed." (Charles A.
Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941).
Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
2nd Statement:
Thursday, May 1, 1941: "The pressure for war is high and mounting. The
people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have 'the
bit in its teeth' and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the
Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a
huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures.
There are the 'intellectuals' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British
agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial
interests, and many others." (The Wartime Journals)
The Jews Own The Press-The Siege
"The Jews...are at the root of regicide, they own the periodical
press, they have in their hands the financial markets, the people as a
whole fall into financial slavery to them..." (The Siege, p. 38)
Nat Rosenberg, International Jewish News
"Federation played a major part in Jewish life throughout the world.
There is a federation in every community of the world where there is a
substantial number of Jews. Today there is a central movement that is
capable of mustering all of its planning, financial and political
resources within twenty-four hours, geared to handling any particular
issue. Proportionately, we have more power than any other comparable
group, far beyond our numbers. The reason is that we are probably the
most well organized minority in the world." (Nat Rosenberg, Denver
Allied Jewish Federation, International Jewish News, January 30, 1976)
Martin Peretz, New Republic Editor-in-Chief
"Much of what you have read about the war in Lebanon-and even more of
what you have seen and heard on television - is simply not true." (New
Republic Editor-in-chief Martin Peretz)
Pastoral letter issued in 1936
"A Jewish question exists, and there will be one as long as the Jews
remain Jews. It is an actual fact that the Jews fight against the
Catholic Church. They are free thinkers, and constitute a vanguard of
Atheism, Bolshevism and Revolution...One should protect one's self
against the evil influence of Jewish morals, and particularly boycott
the Jewish Press and their demoralizing publications." (Pastoral
letter issued in 1936. "An Answer to Father Caughlin's Critics," page
98) top of page
Cecile De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135
Among modern nations with their short memories, the Jewish
people...Whether despised or feared it remains an eternal stranger. it
comes without invitation and remains even when driven out. It is
scattered and yet coherent. It takes up its abode in the very body of
the nations. It creates laws beyond and above the laws. It denies the
idea of a homeland but it possesses its own homeland which it carries
along with it and establishes wherever it goes. It denies the god of
other peoples and everywhere rebuilds the temple. It complains of its
isolation, and by mysterious channels it links together the parts of
the infinite New Jerusalem which covers the whole universe. It has
connections and ties everywhere, which explains how capital and the
Press, concentrated in its hands, conserve the same designs in every
country of the world, and the interests of the race which are
identical in Ruthenian villages and in the City of New York; if it
extols someone he is glorified all over the world, and if it wishes to
ruin someone the work of destruction is carried out as if directed by
a single hand.
The orders come from the depths of Mysterious Darkness. That which the
Jew jeers at and destroys among other peoples, it fanatically
preserves in the bosom of Judaism. If it teaches revolt and anarchy to
others, it in itself shows admirable obedience to its invisible
guides.
In the time of the Turkish revolution, a Jew said proudly to my
father: 'It is we who are making it, we, the Young Turks, the Jews.'
During the Portuguese revolution, I heard the Marquis de Vasconcellos,
Portuguese ambassador at Rome, say 'The Jews and the Free Masons are
directing the revolution in Lisbon.' Today when the greater part of
Europe is given up to the revolution, they are everywhere leading the
movement, according to a single plan. How did they succeed in
concealing this plan which embraced the whole world and which was not
the work of a few months or even years? They used as a screen men of
each country, blind, frivolous, venal, forward, or stupid, and who
knew nothing. And thus they worked in security, these redoubtable
organizers, these sons of an ancient race which knows how to keep a
secret. And that is why none of them has betrayed the others." (Cecile
De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 141-143)
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920
"An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the newspapers, can,
after half an hour conversation, tell anyone what newspaper he
reads...even high prelates of Rome, even Cardinals Amette and Mercier
show themselves more influenced by the Press of their country than
they themselves probably realize...often I have noticed that it is
according to his newspaper that one judges the Papal Bull or the
speech of the Prime Minister." (J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna,
1920; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 171)
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204
"The great telegraphic agencies of the world which are everywhere the
principal source of news for the Press (just as wholesale businesses
supply the retailers), which spreads far and wide that which the world
should know or should not know, and in the form which they wish, these
agencies are either Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The
situation is the same for the smaller agencies which supply news to
the newspapers of less importance, the great publicity agencies which
receive commercial advertisements and which then insert them in the
newspapers at the price of a large commission for themselves, are
principally in the hands of the Jews; so are many provincial
newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not heard directly in the
Press, there comes into play the great indirect influences, Free
Masonry, Finance, etc.
In many places Jews content themselves with this hidden influence,
just as in economic life they consider Joint-Stock companies as the
most profitable. The editors may quite well be Aryans, it is
sufficient that in all important questions they should stand for
Jewish interests, or at least that they should not oppose them. This
is achieved nearly always by the pressure of advertisement agencies."
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 174)
F. Trocase, L'Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris
"The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put everything at a
price, artistic fame as well as success in business. No intellectual
production, no work of art has been able to see the light of day and
reach public notice, without passing by the crucible of the Jewish
Press, without having to submit to its criticism or to pay for its
approval. If an artist should wish to obtain the approbation of the
public, he must of necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish
journals. If a young actress, a musician, a singer of talent should
wish to make her first appearance and to venture before a more of less
numerous audience, she has in most cases not dared to do so, unless
after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews. Otherwise she would
experience certain failure. It was despotic tyranny re-established,
this time for the profit of the Jews and brutally exercised by them in
all its plentitude.
Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese Press dominated by
Judaism, has been absolutely disastrous. It is a work of death which
it has accomplished. Around it and outside it all is void. In all the
classes of the population are the germs of hatred, the seeds, of
discord and of jealously, dissolution and decomposition." (F. Trocase,
L'Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris; The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175-176)
N.H. Webster, London, 1924
"When I first began to write on Revolution a well known London
Publisher said to me; 'Remember that if you take an anti-revolutionary
line you will have the whole literary world against you.' This
appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathize
with a movement which, from the French revolution onwards, has always
been directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly
proclaimed its aim to exalt the manual workers over the
intelligentsia? 'Writers must be proscribed as the most dangerous
enemies of the people' said Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said all
clever men should be guillotined. The system of persecutions against
men of talents was organized...they cried out in the Sections (of
Paris) 'Beware of that man for he has written a book.' Precisely the
same policy has been followed in Russia under moderate socialism in
Germany the professors, not the 'people,' are starving in garrets. Yet
the whole Press of our country is permeated with subversive
influences. Not merely in partisan works, but in manuals of history or
literature for use in schools, Burke is reproached for warning us
against the French Revolution and Carlyle's panegyric is applauded.
And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer is
seized on by the critics and held up as an example of the whole, the
most glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass
unchallenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the
movement. The principle laid down by Collot d'Herbois still holds
good: 'Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la
revolution.'
All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my work. I knew
that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their own
political views, that conspiracy of history is still directed by
certain influences in the Masonic lodges and the Sorbonne [The
facilities of literature and science of the University of Paris]; I
did not know that this conspiracy was being carried on in this
country. Therefore the publisher's warning did not daunt me. If I was
wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared to be
challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet
either with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?
But although my book received a great many generous appreciative
reviews in the Press, criticisms which were hostile took a form which
I had never anticipated. Not a single honest attempt was made to
refute either my French Revolution or World Revolution by the usual
methods of controversy; Statements founded on documentary evidence
were met with flat contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter
evidence. In general the plan adopted was not to disprove, but to
discredit by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me
views I had never expressed, or even by means of offensive
personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method of attack
is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy." (N.H.
Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London, 1924,
Preface; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins, pp. 179-180)
International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922
"It is rather surprising is it not? That which ever way you turn to
trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society, you
come upon a group of Jews. In sports corruption, a group of Jews. In
exploiting finance, a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy, a group
of Jews. In liquor propaganda, a group of Jews. Absolutely dominating
the wireless communications of the world, a group of Jews. The menace
of the movies, a group of Jews. In control of the press through
business and financial pressure, a group of Jews. War profiteers, 80
percent of them, Jews. The mezmia of so-called popular music, which
combines weak mindedness, with every suggestion of lewdness, Jews.
Organizations of anti-Christian laws and customs, again Jews. It is
time to show that the cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots. There
is a religious prejudice in this country; there is, indeed, a
religious persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the
religious liberties of the majority of the people. And this prejudice
and persecution and use of force, is Jewish and nothing but Jewish.
If it is anti-Semitism to say that Communism in the United States is
Jewish, so be it. But to the unprejudiced mind it will look very much
like Americanism. Communism all over the world and not only in Russia
is Jewish." (International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922)
The Patriot (London) November 9, 1939
"There is, however, no real evidence that the Soviet Government has
changed its policy of communism under control of the Bolsheviks, or
has loosened its control of communism in other countries, or has
ceased to be under Jew control. Unwanted tools certainly have been
'liquidated' in Russia by Stalin in his determination to be the
supreme head, and it is not unnatural that some Jews, When all the
leading positions were held by them, have suffered in the process of
rival elimination. Outside Russia, events in Poland show how the
Comintern still works. The Polish Ukraine has been communized under
Jewish commissars, with property owners either shot or marched into
Russia as slaves, with all estates confiscated and all business and
property taken over by the State. It has been said in the American
Jewish Press that the Bolshevik advance into the Ukraine was to save
the Jews there from meeting the fate of their co-religionists in
Germany, but this same Press is silent as to the fate meted out to the
Christian Poles.
In less than a month, in any case, the lie has been given to Molotov's
non-interference statement. Should international communism ever
complete its plan of bringing civilization to naught, it is
conceivable that some form of World Government in the hands of a few
men could emerge, which would not be communism. It would be the
domination of barbarous tyrants over the world of slaves, and
communism would have been used as the means to an end." (The Patriot
(London) November 9, 1939; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, pp.
23-24)
G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc
"As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary
Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must
be a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable Press."
(G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc)
Charles Sarolea, Belgian Consul
"I am quite ready to admit that the Jewish leaders are only a
proportionately infinitesimal fraction, even as the British rulers of
India are an infinitesimal fraction. But it is none the less true that
those few Jewish leaders are the masters of Russia, even as the
fifteen hundred Anglo-Indian Civil Servants are the masters of India.
For any traveler in Russia to deny such a truth would be to deny the
evidence of our own senses. When you find that out of a large number
of important Foreign Office officials whom you have met, all but two
are Jews, you are entitled to say that the Jews are running the
Russian Foreign Office." (The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern
World, a passage quoted from Impressions of Soviet Russia, by Charles
Sarolea, Belgian Consul in Edinburgh and Professor of French
Literature in the University of Edinburgh, pp. 93-94; The Rulers of
Russia, Denis Fahey, pp. 31-32)
All These Things, A.N. Field
"The reader may wonder why newspapers never mention that Bolshevism is
simply a Jewish conquest of Russia. The explanation is that the
international news agencies on which papers rely for foreign news are
controlled by Jews. The Jew, Jagoda, is head of the G.P.U. (the former
Cheka), now called 'The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs.'
The life, death or imprisonment of Russian citizens is in the hands of
this Jew, and his spies are everywhere. According to the
anti-Comintern bulletin (15/4/35) Jagoda's organization between 1929
and 1934 drove between five and six million Russian peasants from
their homes. (The Government of France now (July, 1936) has as Prime
Minister, the Jewish Socialist, Leon Blum. According to the French
journal Candide, M. Blum has substantial interests in Weiler's Jupiter
aero-engine works in France, and his son, Robert Blum, is manager of a
branch Weiler works in Russia, making Jupiter aero-engines for the
Russian Government)." (All These Things, A.N. Field; The Rulers of
Russia, Denis Fahey, p. 37)
The Cause of World Unrest (1920), Gerard Shelley
"Marxism, on which Bolshevism is founded, really did not express the
political side of the Russian character and the Bolsheviks were not
sincere Socialists or Communists, but Jews, working for the ulterior
motives of Judaism. Lev Cherny divided these Jews into three main
classes, firstly, financial Jews, who dabbled in muddy international
waters; secondly, Zionists, whose aims are, of course, well known;
and, thirdly, the Bolsheviks, including the Jewish Bund. The creed of
these Bolsheviks, according to the lecturer, is, briefly, that the
proletariat of all countries are nothing but gelatinous masses, which,
if the Intelligentsia were destroyed in each country, would leave
these masses at the mercy of the Jews." (The Cause of World Unrest
(1920), Gerard Shelley, pp. 136-137; The Rulers of Russia, Denis
Fahey, p. 37-38).
N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342
"We have only to look around us in the world today, to see everywhere
the same disintegrating power at work, in art, literature, the drama,
the daily Press, in every sphere that can influence the mind of the
public...our modern cinemas perpetually endeavor to stir up class
hatred by scenes and phrases showing 'the injustice of Kings,' 'the
sufferings of the people,' 'the Selfishness of Aristocrats,'
regardless of whether these enter into the theme of the narrative or
not. And in the realms of literature, not merely in works of fiction
but in manuals for schools, in histories and books professing to be of
serious educative value and receiving a skillfully organized boom
throughout the press, everything is done to weaken patriotism, to
shake belief in all existing institutions by the systematic perversion
of both contemporary and historical facts. I do not believe that all
this is accidental; I do not believe that the public asks for the
anti-patriotic to demoralizing books and plays placed before it; on
the contrary it invariably responds to an appeal to patriotism and
simple healthy emotions. The heart of the people is still sound, but
ceaseless efforts are made to corrupt it." (N.H. Webster, Secret
Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 180-181)
Marcus Eli Ravage in Century Magazine, 1928
"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not
so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and
commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around
that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by
nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars
and the Chief Beneficiaries of those wars. We are at once the founders
and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the
rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for
versatility!...
You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit
the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue
Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good;
granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to
our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your
government, and the very thoughts you think every day?...'The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring
on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will
underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is
that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have
carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the
courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant
for anybody to read?
If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not
direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it
wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish
financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as
well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole
civilization...
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are
intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your
ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We {Jews} have
been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war {WWI} but of nearly
all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major
revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and
frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it.
No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what
great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you
alone.
But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down
the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the
whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours
ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the
irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the
American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea
of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long
way off. We still dominate you...
Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress.
We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien
faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at
cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly
ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to
accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your
impulses, paralyzed your desires...
So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should
probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make
no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain
about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an
international people, a compact minority in your midst, with
traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your
own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your
orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see
the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it
seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed
creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is
certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you
appear to realize...
That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about
your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about
whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and
the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we
did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then
you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion
picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles,
we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our
crimes...
You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the
truth, and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable
finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were
the prime movers in the Bourgeois Democratic Revolutions of the
century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we
did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th
Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities.
They benefited us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite
as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder
that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as
long as they did not resort to violence?" (Marcus Eli Ravage (Big
Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York
Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine,
January-February, 1928).
John Swinton, Former Chief of The New York Times
"We know the powers that are defying the people...Our Government is in
the hands of pirates. All the power of politics, and of Congress, and
of the administration is under the control of the moneyed
interests...The adversary has the force of capital, thousands of
millions of which are in his hand...He will grasp the knife of law,
which he has so often wielded in his interest. He will lay hold of his
forces in the legislature. He will make use of his forces in the
press, which are always waiting for the wink, which is as good as a
nod to a blind horse... Political rings are managed by skillful and
unscrupulous political gamblers, who possess the 'machine' by which
the populace are at once controlled and crushed." (John Swinton,
Former Chief of The New York Times, in his book, A Momentous Question:
The Respective Attitudes of Labor and Capital)
CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate.
"The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest.
They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the
spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a
national and patriotic duty - not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to
get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let
ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of
these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical
and holy to react against them." (New York Herald Tribune, August 17,
1937)
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>Report of Former
PRIME MINISTER WINSTON CHURCHILL:
WINSTON CHURCHILL DISCUSSED ISLAM
http://www.islam-watch.org/AdrianMorgan/Winston-Churchill-Islamism.htm
Winston Churchill On Islamism
by Adrian Morgan
10 April, 2007
Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill was born in Blenheim Palace in
Woodstock, Oxfordshire, on November 30, 1874. His father Randolph was
a Conservative politician and descendant of the first Duke of
Marlborough, who would die of syphilis in 1892. Winston Churchill's
mother Jennie (1854 - 1921) was a flirtatious American socialite,
daughter of Leonard Jerome (Jacobson), who owned the New York Times.
In May, 1940, Churchill became British prime minister until the end of
World War II, and he led Britain again from 1951 to 1955. By the time
Winston Churchill died after a stroke on January 24, 1965, he had
become one of the pre-eminent figuresof the 20th century. He had been
awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1953.
The British leaders who have followed Churchill (with the exception,
perhaps, of Margaret Thatcher) have shown little of his independence
of spirit, or individualism. Five years ago, Churchill was voted the
greatest Briton of all time in a BBC poll. Those who claim to support
Churchill think mainly of his role as a statesman, and as a warrior in
the battle against Hitler and fascism.
In today's politically correct Britain, few people are prepared
openly to criticize Islamism. A collective cowardice afflicts the
chattering classes. Too fearful of the stigma of being labeled
"Islamophobe", leaders and media figures would rather buy into the
lies of Muslim victimization than objectively analyze the threat that
global radical Islam poses to democracy. Few are aware of Churchill's
comments on Islam, and fewer still would dare repeat those words in
public today.
Churchill was born into privilege but he gained first-hand knowledge
of Islam in the army. He joined the Fourth Hussars in 1895, and was
posted in the North-West Frontier of India (now Pakistan), bordering
Afghanistan. During this time, he became a war correspondent, working
with full approval of Sir Bindon Blood, chief staff officer of the
Chitral relief force. Originally, Churchill's reports were sent
anonymously by telegram and letter to the Pioneer Mail. Eventually he
was writing for the London Daily Telegraph under his own name. The
first of these reports was published on October 6, 1897. He was paid
five pounds per article.
He wrote of his experiences in the borderlands with Afghanistan in a
book titled The Story of the Malakand Field Force. This book detailed
not only the conflict of the region, but also its cultural and
military history, with notes on natural history. When his mother
informed him in late 1897 that Longmans had agreed to publish this
tome, he noted: that "the publication of this book will certainly be
the most noteworthy act of my life. Up to date (of course). By its
reception I shall measure the chances of my possible success in the
world." The book appeared the following year.
In this book, when describing a local imam, Churchill coined the term
"Mad Mullah". Speaking of the Pathan and Beluchi tribesmen of the
border regions, he noted with some sarcasm that "the Mullah will raise
his voice and remind them of other days when the sons of the prophet
drove the infidel from the plains of India, and ruled at Delhi, as
wide an Empire as the Kafir holds to-day: when the true religion
strode proudly through the earth and scorned to lie hidden and
neglected among the hills: when mighty princes ruled in Bagdad, and
all men knew that there was one God, and Mahomet was His prophet. And
the young men hearing these things will grip their Martinis, and pray
to Allah, that one day He will bring some Sahib (prince) - best prize
of all - across their line of sight at seven hundred yards so that, at
least, they may strike a blow for insulted and threatened Islam."
Churchill wrote: "Indeed it is evident that Christianity, however
degraded and distorted by cruelty and intolerance, must always exert a
modifying influence on men's passions, and protect them from the more
violent forms of fanatical fever, as we are protected from smallpox by
vaccination. But the Mahommedan religion increases, instead of
lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by
the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the
people of all other creeds, to this form of madness."
After 9/11, George W. Bush famously described Islam as a "religion of
peace". Churchill entertained no such fancy notions. In his history of
the Malakand Field Force, Churchill wrote that "civilisation is
confronted with militant Mahommedanism. The forces of progress clash
with those of reaction. The religion of blood and war is face to face
with that of peace. Luckily the religion of peace is usually the
better armed."
By the time his first book was published, Churchill had taken part in
active service, fighting in Bangalore. He joined Lord Kitchener's army
in the Sudan, and took part in the Battle of Omdurman on September 2,
1898. This battle took place in what is now a suburb of Khartoum, and
pitted British troops against 50,000 belonging to a local warlord,
Abdullah al-Taashi. This man called himself the Khalifa or "Caliph",
and was the successor of Muhammad Ahmad. Ahmad had been the
self-styled "Mahdi" (Muslim Messiah) who had beheaded General Gordon
at Khartoum in 1885. The war in Sudan was a religious war. The region
had been exploited by the Egyptians from 1819 to 1883. Originally the
"Mahdi" had waged war against Muslim Egypt but, irritated by the
presence of 150 British troops in Sudan, he soon declared Jihad (Holy
War) against all Christians. The Mahdi himself had died of typhus in
1885. The Battle of Omdurman was not the last decisive battle in this
war, but it signaled the last time a cavalry charge was mounted by
British troops.
Churchill wrote of the Mahdi's jihad, the succession of the Khalifa
and Omdurman in a two-volume book published by Longmans in 1899.
Entitled "The River War: An Account of the Reconquest of Sudan",
Churchill wrote on pages 248-250 of the second volume: ""How dreadful
are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the
fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a
dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits,
slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and
insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet
rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace
and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in
Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute
property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the
final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be
a great power among men.
"Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the
brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the
influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those
who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising
faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is
sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it
had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall,
as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."
This contentious passage became abridged in a shorter version
published in 1902. However, the abridged version still contained some
harsh words for the fanaticism of Islam. In Chapter One, Churchill
wrote: "Fanaticism is not a cause of war. It is the means which helps
savage peoples to fight. It is the spirit which enables them to
combine - the great common object before which all personal or tribal
disputes become insignificant. What the horn is to the rhinoceros,
what the sting is to the wasp, the Mohammedan faith was to the Arabs
of the Soudan - a faculty of offence or defence."
In Chapter Two, Churchill stated: "All the warlike operations of
Mohammedan peoples are characterised by fanaticism" and in its third
chapter he observed: "After the fall of Khartoum and the retreat of
the British armies the Mahdi became the absolute master of the Soudan.
Whatever pleasures he desired he could command, and, following the
example of the founder of the Mohammedan faith, he indulged in what
would seem to Western minds gross excesses. He established an
extensive harem for his own peculiar use, and immured therein the
fairest captives of the war."
Churchill entered politics in the same year that "The River War" was
originally published. As his eponymous grandson pointed out last
March, Churchill noted the threat of Wahhabism on June 14, 1921 at the
House of Commons. His grandson stated in an address to the Locke
Foundation that this speech "followed "hard on the heels of the Cairo
Conference, at which he had presided over the re-shaping of the Middle
East". This was the March 1921 Cairo Conference, rather than the
better known Cairo Conferences of 1943.
At that time, Churchill was secretary for the British colonies, and
he had been involved in the creation of Iraq (in 1921), Jordan
(Transjordan) and Palestine. The intention, he told the Commons, was
"to set up an Arab government, and to make it take the responsibility,
with our aid and our guidance and with an effective measure of our
support, until they are strong enough to stand alone ... (and) to
reduce our commitments and to extricate ourselves from our burdens
while at the same time honorably discharging our obligations and
building up strong and effective Arab government which will always be
the friend of Britain.
What is less well known is that he also said on that day: "A large
number of Bin Saud's followers belong to the Wahabi sect, a form of
Mohammedanism which bears, roughly speaking, the same relationship to
orthodox Islam as the most militant form of Calvinism would have borne
to Rome in the fiercest times of [Europe's] religious wars.
The Wahhabis profess a life of exceeding austerity, and what they
practice themselves they rigorously enforce on others. They hold it as
an article of duty, as well as of faith, to kill all who do not share
their opinions and to make slaves of their wives and children. Women
have been put to death in Wahhabi villages for simply appearing in the
streets.
It is a penal offence to wear a silk garment. Men have been killed
for smoking a cigarette and, as for the crime of alcohol, the most
energetic supporter of the temperance cause in this country falls far
behind them. Austere, intolerant, well-armed, and blood-thirsty, in
their own regions the Wahhabis are a distinct factor which must be
taken into account, and they have been, and still are, very dangerous
to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina.
The Bin Saud to whom Churchill refers here is King Abdul Aziz bin
Saud (c. 1880 - 1953), who would go on officially to establish Saudi
Arabia in 1932. In 1926, this king's followers had control of Mecca.
Traditionally a caravan procession (mahmal) would arrive annually at
Mecca with embroidered curtains from Egypt at the time of the Hajj
pilgrimage. The curtains would be placed around the Ka'aba and then
returned to Egypt. The Wahhabists slaughtered 25 of the Mahmal caravan
members at Mina because they played trumpets. Music was forbidden to
the Wahhabists, and the tradition of mahmal was abandoned. The
incident soured relations between Egypt and the emerging nation of
Saudi Arabia.
Winston Churchill was fully aware of the potential for fanaticism and
warfare, inherent within Islam since the time of the founder and his
successors. He did not choose to dilute his words. His experiments at
nation building in the Middle East may not have been as successful as
he would have wished. He knew that war had attended Islam since its
origins, and a century ago fanatics were exploiting this. Today, the
world is still threatened by Islamic terrorism and the war of jihad is
still being fought, even in the mountains and valleys of Malakand. Our
leaders today, unlike Winston Churchill, are too conciliatory to
acknowledge publicly the true nature of the beast that threatens us.
When he was describing Nazism, Churchill said: "An appeaser is one
who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last." He also said:
"Victory will never be found by taking the line of least resistance."
Those words should be heeded. In the current struggle against the
spread of Islamism, they are as true today as they were 65 years ago.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>
>Let's Talk about Jews and Elections
I prefer to talk about Muslims killing Christians, Jews, Hindus,
Buddhists .... Russian schoolkids, Scottish airplane traverlers,
Spanish and British commuters, Asian nightclubbers .... their own
daughters, wives, and mothers.
And yet ... and yet .... and yet.... these Muslims will lie with a
straight face and declare that it's all about Israel and Palestine.
Bo Raxo
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 19:05:57 -0500, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com>
Yeah, it's not like we kept 25 million Iraqis under the thumb of
severe sanctions for years, causing the estimated deaths of hundreds
of thousands due to lack of medical supplies. Or invaded, leading to
a civil war that has killed tens of thousands more. Or imposed a
dictator on the Persians and traned up his secret police, who tortured
and terroized the country, until the Iranians managed to overthrow his
son decades later. Or shot down an Iranian civilian airliner for no
good reason. Nah, all of the blood is entirely on Muslim hands, these
good Christian nations have never killed anyone in the Middle East.
Not like Bush has ever even used the term "crusade", eh?
Bo Raxo
Way Back Jack
wrote:
The Russian schoolkids, Asian nightclubbers, Hindus, Buddhists did all
that?
And as for Americans, you wanna volunteer to spread your cheeks for
Akmed and his scimitar? Eh?
Fucking appeasement specialist left-wing pussy.
Topaz
They could show stories of Jeffrey Dahmer and of other White people
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
Topaz
his forces were involved in the siege. He condemned the action and all
attacks against civilians via a statement issued by his envoy Akhmed
Zakayev, currently resident in London. Aslan Maskhadov later on
November 1 called Shamil Basayev a terrorist for his involvement in
the Beslan crisis."
I don't know if this next one is true, but there have been black psyop
operations before.
"The unique basketball hoop bombs inside the sealed gymnasium, which
confirmed for ever that Beslan was a black psyop atrocity perpetrated
by the west. Despite all western reporters being contained 100 yards
behind the Russian Special Forces perimeter outside the sealed
compound, and despite the terrorists within immediately confiscating
all cellphones from the teachers and children, the BBC magically
described these specific unique booby traps live-to-air before Special
Forces had even penetrated the inner cordon at Beslan. Western media
reporters could not possibly have known"
Here is how much you can trust your Jewish controlled media:
"I ask you to consider the following:
Imagine if the rulers of a Mideast nation such as Syria, and I am not
simply speaking about a gang of radicals in that nation, but the
actual government ministers of this Mideast nation, launched terrorist
attacks against American civilian installations. Imagine if the
Syrian Government sent terrorists into Egypt to firebomb American
theaters and libraries and treacherously plotted to blame the attacks
on Egypt so that the United States would go to war against that
nation.
If successful, the treacherous plan would harm America even more than
the terrorist attacks themselves, because even more American blood and
treasure would be spilled in a devastating war on an innocent nation!
Imagine that the premature explosion of the one of the Syrian agent's
bombs led to the capture of all the Syrian operatives and ultimately
caused a complete exposure of Syria's terrorism against America. In
fact, imagine that the failed plot became so exposed that the Syrian
Defense minister had to resign.
How do you think the United States would respond to these acts of
terrorism committed against Americans by the Syrian government? Would
not at the very least America make military strikes at Syrian
installations?
Remember, that without Iraq committing even a single warlike act
against the United States, America invaded Iraq and spent hundreds of
billions of dollars and suffered great numbers of dead and wounded.
Again, how would America respond to any Mideast nation that clearly
made terrorist attacks against American civilian installations? After
such dastardly terrorist attacks would the American people send
billions of dollars in aid including military weapons to Syria? After
such attacks, how would every Congressman be viewed that took money
from Lobby organizations that support the Syrian government? Would
they not be attacked in the press, would they not be properly accused
of disloyalty to the United States, perhaps even treason? Imagine
that due to the ubiquitous pro-Syrian political and media power in
America that amazingly no actions were taken against Syria and that
military and other aid to Syria continued. And finally, imagine that
years after the attacks, the President of Syria in an open, public
ceremony gives awards to the Syrian terrorists who bombed American
installations and calls them "heroes." Do you think a free press would
keep such an obscene ceremony from the knowledge of the American
public? Or do you think that the Syrian Government's praising of
terrorists who attacked America would unleash a huge scandal and
uproar.
Well, everything I just described to you actually has happened, and I
mean in every detail.
Except it wasn't the Syrian government that launched terrorist attacks
on America, it was Israel.
In the Lavon Affair, the Israeli government sent terrorists to bomb
American installations in Egypt and blame the Egyptians for it. One of
their bombs exploded prematurely which led to the capture of one the
agents and eventually the rounding up of all of them. They confessed
and the Israeli Defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign
because of the failure and exposure of this Israeli treachery. This
is no fantasy; this is absolute historical fact which you can verify
from numerous major historical sources, including leading Jewish
sources.
Only thing is, you probably haven't even heard of it.
Why not?
And why would America continue to give military weapons and equipment
to a nation that launched terrorist attacks against us? What does
that tell you about Israeli influence over the American government and
the press?"
David Duke
www.davidduke.com
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>"The Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov immediately denied
Muslime killed them.
Can't escape that fact.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
> Suppose the media was out to get White people, (as if they are not).
Suppose Muslime started behving like humans, (which they do not).
Topaz
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
On studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media
and Rule America"
It may be rather out of date but it still explains why things are the
way they are.
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting
System (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these
three has been under the absolute control of a single man over a long
enough period of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff
the corporation at every level with officers of his choosing and then
to place his imprint indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been
a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities
Communications, Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a
Jew...In an interview in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek,
Goldenson boasted 'I built this company (ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the
Jewish "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the
contrary, new Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve
Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at
CBS is Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of
reality, of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior
are Jews. In particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is
Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant
role in TV entertainment programming in recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment
companies and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross,
Jew) Walt Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a
lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also
illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of
opinion... The Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several
large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the
Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's
largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all
its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks- the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen
major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership
and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines
for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and
what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York
Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's
and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the
Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish
real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO
of Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington
Post Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled
by Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the
president is Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of children's
books, with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO
is Richard Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted
Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence
on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also
are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
waybackjack
wrote:
>
> There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
>Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
>Hollywood.
The Hollywood Jews are the lesser of the two evils. Here's the other
one:
MUSLIME MASSACRE OF WOMEN
Women break silence on honour killings
Print
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 18/04/2007
Reporter: David Hardaker
A group of women in the Israeli city of Ramle has broken the code of
silence on a string of honour killings within the city's Arab
community. For one woman, it has meant giving police the evidence to
charge her own son for murdering her daughter.
Transcript
KERRY O'BRIEN: Now, a powerful story of family honour killings in the
Arab community of a small Israeli city named Ramle. Where such
killings are usually accompanied by an unbreakable code of silence, in
Ramle, after a string of deaths, a group of women has broken ranks.
For one woman, it has meant giving police the evidence to charge her
own son for murdering her daughter.
Middle East Correspondent David Hardaker reports.
DAVID HARDAKER: This is the area of Joh Arish (phonetic), a tough Arab
neighbourhood with a tradition of killing.
HAIM SCHREIBHAND, DETECTIVE, RAMLE POLICE: In this house, two girls in
the family have been murdered.
DAVID HARDAKER: The Abu Ghanem family runs this part of town and has
been killing its women in the name of honour. In all, eight young
women have been murdered here in the last six years. The crimes and
the killers protected by a code of silence.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA, RAMLE POLICE: You come to a crime scene like
this and all you meet is people which doesn't want to covert with you,
doesn't want to talk, doesn't want to say what they saw, what they
heard, what they know. They're just like ignoring the police. They are
even ignoring the body.
DAVID HARDAKER: Limor Yehuda is part of a small police unit
investigating the honour killings of Joh Arish. The area is part of an
area of Ramle, in Israel, a mixed city of Muslims and Jews. It's a
city where traditional Arab culture collides with the 21st century and
where women who've looked the wrong way have paid with their lives.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: It is terrible to know that in the era of 2007
and such terrible murders happen. Women that get murdered for the way
they dressed or the way they talked, maybe because they talked on the
phone with someone or looked at some guy or even didn't look at some
guy, for stupid, stupid reasons or for no reason.
DAVID HARDAKER: Last year, 19-year-old Reem Abu Ghanem was murdered.
Her crime was to turn her back on the man that her family had picked
for her to marry and fall for another. Her killer turned out to be her
older brother, a respected paediatrician who Reem had trusted for
protection. He smothered Reem in a cloth soaked with anaesthetic drugs
from his hospital. He believed he'd killed her. His four brothers
threw her body into the boot of a car. They drove to a field on the
outskirts of town to a deserted and derelict house, where they would
dispose of her down an old well, but when they arrived, it turned out
that Reem was not dead after all.
So she was still alive. Do you know, did they do anything at that
point before throwing her in?
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: Yeah, yeah. After she cried, after she begged
for her life, they used a stone to hit her on the head. And then she
was still alive, she didn't die from the injury. And she was then
thrown out into the well like this. Alive, semi-injured, bleeding, I
guess. It's terrible. It's so cruel, so vicious. But to throw someone
alive when is your relatives, your own flesh and blood, right? It's,
it's very, very difficult to bear.
DAVID HARDAKER: For weeks, no-one breathed a word of what happened
that night.
DR AUNI KHIL, RAMLE COMMUNITY: Some of the community see the killers
as hero. True, as hero. And they are dealing with them as heroes and
this is very, very bad.
DAVID HARDAKER: Dr Auni Khil is part of Ramle's Arab community and
he's been working to stop honour killings, and he is not surprised
that Reem Abu Ghanem's killer was a doctor. As far as he's concerned,
the killings are all about power in a male-dominated society.
DR AUNI KHIL: I think that there is the education in the university
and there is the human being. The connection between the two things
not in this case, there is no connection.
DAVID HARDAKER: Reem's older brother was arrested after a tip-off from
a prison informant. Despite the crime, the women of Joh Arish remained
silent until the killing this year of another of their number. Hamda
Abu Ghanem, also 19, was shot in the head nine times, as she lay in
her bed upstairs alone in her house. Her killer was her own brother.
This time, the women broke their silence. For the Ramle police, it was
extraordinary.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: Wow - huge, huge step. When we are talking
about this murder case, it's like a big step because we learned that
among the years, there were like eight murders in the same family, Abu
Ghanem family. The women are getting murdered one by one. All of a
sudden, we're all like in shock - they decided to talk.
DAVID HARDAKER: The woman that went to the police was Imama Abu
Ghanem, the mother of Hamda. She gave police the evidence to charge
her own son.
IMAMA ABU GHANEM (translation): In the Koran, there is no order,
murder your sister, and I've asked my son, “Why didn't you put the
rest of your bullets in your own head?”
DAVID HARDAKER: Imama Abu Ghanem had lost everything and had nothing
more to lose by speaking to the police.
IMAMA ABU GHANEM (translation): Over there where there are Christians,
it's OK. Nobody bothers anyone. The war is in our own homes, not in
the neighbourhood, really.
DAVID HARDAKER: It seems her daughter knew she would die.
IMAMA ABU GHANEM (translation): She knew, yes, but she was afraid to
tell me. He called her "garbage" and said, "I'll get you, Hamda”. She
said, "What are you waiting for?"
DAVID HARDAKER: What do you think about what she has done?
DR AUNI KHIL: Look, I think this is a very, very important step
against the killing ceremony but she's now in really danger, and I
hope that nobody will be able to touch her.
DAVID HARDAKER: Imama Abu Ghanem's move may have been a small triumph
but another woman who gave evidence to police has been missing for
close to a month and may be dead. Hamda Abu Ghanem's name is to be
carried on by the women of the Joh Arish. Hamda's sister-in-law has
just given birth to a baby girl. She tells Israeli policeman Haim
Schreibhand her name is Hamda. It's intended as an act of defiance.
But the tradition of killing is far from dying out. Men here keep a
blacklist of the names of bad women and the police know to expect more
bad news any time. The city's religious leaders and other community
leaders have started to speak against honour killings but it's hardly
enough.
DR AUNI KHIL: We have to try to start some action against this killing
and we are trying to enter to the school or to the Arab schools here
in Ramle to do something to educate, to learn the children that the
women are our mothers, our sisters, our wives and daughters.
DAVID HARDAKER: It is a bit dangerous, isn't it? Because you are
posing a threat to this established small community?
DR AUNI KHIL: Yes, there is a danger, some dangers, but somebody must
say, “Stop, stop with these killings”.
DAVID HARDAKER: Limor Yehuda believes honour killings are a twisted
version of killing and that it's time for Arab leaders to act.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: There is leadership, a religious and a
scholarly leadership in the Arabic community and they should do more.
They can progress this idea of fighting against this terrible,
terrible phenomena. And they should do more. They shouldn't just talk.
KERRY O'BRIEN: As I said, a powerful story. And the reporter, David
Hardaker.
_________
Topaz
Assallaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullaahi Wa Barakaatuhu wrote:
"Respected Brothers/Sisters in Islam,
The Taliban and Women
"The treatment of women in Afghanistan is a subject that the Western
Media and Feminists have concentrated their ideological warfare
efforts on. They have based their 'reports' and analyses on a number
of interviews with Communist women, whose idea of 'freedom' is similar
to the freedom given to women in the West, i.e...."
"Women's Life Conditions Presently and Under Rabbani Regime The
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is fully committed to the social,
cultural and economic development of women. The government has been
able to protect the honor, life and property of Afghan women. Contrary
to the situation under the Rabbani regime, women can now be outside
their houses safely without the fear of being kidnapped, raped or
looted. They no longer fear conditions that were common during the
Rabbani regime. According to amnesty international reports of 1992-95,
women in Afghanistan bore the brunt of the atrocities by the Rabbani
regime and other armed factions. Irresponsible commanders and gunmen
not only violated the honor of women by raping them but mutilated
women's bodies and in many cases, cut their breasts etc. Similarly,
common was murder, torture and execution of our people by the armed
factions. Due to the intolerable atrocities, the Taleban Islamic
Movement emerged to deliver the defenseless Afghan people from the
cruel hands of the warlords. One should ask oneself, is women's
freedom to be raped with their breasts cut, or is it to freely live
their lives without fear of even comments being made at them. The
former regime that did not serve the country had employed women in a
number of sectors without any real need. Some of them were used just
for the sexual entertainment of the bureaucracy. Due to the
ineffective and immoral institutions, they have temporarily been
relieved of their duties. The government pays them their salaries
regularly. But women whose work is really needed, are still working in
the health, education and security sectors. As conditions in the
country improve, so will, doubtlessly, job opportunities for women.
Restoration of Women's Safety, Dignity and Freedom
Being highly concerned about the well-being of its female citizens,
the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, soon introduced measures to put a
stop to the miserable living conditions under which the women lived in
Kabul. After the communists took over in Kabul, they began to exploit
women for the purpose of advancing their political and social agendas.
In spite of war condition in the country and with no work in the
offices, the communist regime forced a large number of women to attend
government offices only for their amusement. The Islamic Emirate
decided to pay the salaries of these women at their homes, so that
they could stay home and take care of their families and children. The
purpose of this policy is to help revive the Afghan family and
household, as the foundation of the Afghan society, a foundation that
was intentionally destroyed by the communist regime... "
Way Back Jack
wrote:
CHRISTIANS MUST CONVERT OR GET OUT
Christians flee after threats
11/05/2007 19:44 - (SA)
Islamabad - Several Christian families have fled their homes in
northwestern Pakistan after their minority community received
threatening letters to shut churches and convert to Islam, a rights
activist said on Friday.
The unsigned letters were distributed this week in the town of
Charsadda - where Pakistan's interior minister last month escaped a
suicide attack that killed 28 people.
Shahbaz Bhatti, head of the All Pakistan Minorities Alliance, claimed
militants trying to impose Taliban-style social strictures were
responsible for the letters, which gave Christians until May 17 to
convert.
He said several families among the 500 or so Christians in the town
had already migrated to other places and others were contemplating the
same.
He appealed to President Pervez Musharraf to "take strong and
immediate measures for the safety of our people".
Bhatti said: "These extremists are asking us to change our religion.
We will not do it, even if we have to die."
Police said on Thursday they had stepped up security at churches in
Charsadda. Copies of the handwritten letter, sent to churches and
homes, did not say what consequences the Christians might face if they
did not comply with the ultimatum.
Bombing music stores
The threats come amid a spate of reports about how religious
vigilantes are using intimidation and violence to enforce a strict
interpretation of Islam across an expanding swath of Pakistan near the
border with Afghanistan.
Other recent examples are bombings of music stores - including at
least three blasts in Charsadda in the past week - threats to barbers
not to shave customers' beards and pressure for the closure of schools
for girls.
Christians and other minorities make up about three percent of
Pakistan's overwhelmingly Muslim population of about 160 million.
Topaz
>The unsigned letters were distributed this week in the town of
>Charsadda - where Pakistan's interior minister last month escaped a
>suicide attack that killed 28 people.
>
Unsigned letters are from extremists not average Muslims. There are
Christians who are much worse:
"For Islam, there will be no mercy, no forgiveness, no compassion. For
Islam and its followers, there will be only death."
Way Back Jack
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
_ G O D _
news:20r0539i6cg370d7g...@4ax.com...
>
>
> ....extremists not average Muslims. There
> are Christians who are much worse:
So? There are Bloods who are much worse
than some Crips, as they can be vice-versa,
COck-sucker Jack....
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
waybackjack
wrote:
>On Sat, 19 May 2007 11:04:36 GMT, he...@home.net (Way Back Jack) wrote:
>
>
>>The unsigned letters were distributed this week in the town of
>>Charsadda - where Pakistan's interior minister last month escaped a
>>suicide attack that killed 28 people.
>>
> Unsigned letters are from extremists not average Muslims.
There are no "average" muslims; all support jihad and expansionism.
waybackjack
wrote:
Islam is a filthy, vile, vicious political manifesto of terrorism
masquerading as religion, with its tenets clearly written in the blood
of
its victims. It is political cancer metastasizing into an anti-Western
genocidal cult. Its adherents are the most simpleminded of nationals
cheering the murder of innocent civilians. Islam, like its communist
neighbor, is attempting to destroy all western thought in favor of
intolerance, mass murder and mass conformity. Islam is a direct attack
on
the individualism and freedom of thought that helped create the
western
world. If Islam is permitted its cancerous spread, the world will
enter
another dark age of bigotry, intolerance and the genocidal rage of
madmen
masquerading as religious leaders.
If Israel is any test case, Islam has proven its political ideology is
one
of hate, intolerance and genocidal rage. Virtually every Islamic
nation is
ruled with an iron fist because their Islamic populations behave like
rabid
dogs. Islam has proven itself incompatible with civilized western
values,
and should be treated as a political manifesto of terrorism.
Spare me the body count of other religions. I haven't seen Catholics,
Protestants, Jews, or any other religion take such pleasure in
murdering
innocents in my lifetime. The past is the past, and Islam's murderous
ideology seems to currently command somewhat of a popular monopoly in
the
"joy of killing" Westerners, and, being a Westerner, I'm quite
prepared to
return the favor a thousandfold.
For Westerners, the destruction of Islam is a matter of survival.
Unfortunately, too many religious individuals have been fooled into
granting
Islam that which it does not deserve: Survival. I've seen images of
the
followers of Islam jumping, clapping, and cheering in a euphoric
murderous
orgy of twisted joy when some of Islam's storm troopers killed 3,000
Americans on 9/11. Since I'm personally unencumbered by any religious
baggage, I clearly see Islam for the political manifesto of terrorism
that
it is, and that its followers are as deserving of the fate that their
terrorists so willingly bestow upon others. Islam has earned its place
in
history with the bombing of the World Trade Center; now, we just need
to
secure its final resting place in the trash bin of history.
For Islam, there will be no mercy, no forgiveness, no compassion. For
Islam
and its followers, there will be only death. For the rest of the
world,
there will be relief at Islam's last gasp.
Topaz
Ian Buckley - Shamireaders June 19, 2005
Pound's biographer Professor Hugh Kenner - with whom I had the honour
of corresponding shortly before his death - considered that without
its poets the world would have already have long since succumbed to
total exhaustion.
More practically, perhaps, we can view religion as playing a similar
valuable role in preserving traditional societies, and maintaining
higher values than the almighty dollar. But not all faiths have 'what
it takes' to resist the trend towards a world turned into a counting
house on top of a rubbish dump.
Indeed, both Judaism and the Protestant variant of Christianity are
implicated, more or less, in the rise of capitalism. Additionally,
traditionalist Catholics believe that their Church is now a shadow of
its former state, having virtually self-destructed after Vatican II.
While Eastern Orthodoxy and even Japanese Shinto play their honourable
part in resisting the rush towards a porno-trash non-culture, it is
pre-eminently Islam that is the biggest stumbling block in the way of
the New World Order.
In the first place Islam is a profoundly and genuinely democratic
faith, as opposed to the 'democracy' of fakery and computerised
trickery that characterised the election of Bush and Bliar. Following
on from this, Muslims also hold true to economic democracy in the form
of the prohibition of usury. Though now abandoned, this was also once
a doctrine of the Christian Church. Such a fundamental point is, to
say the least, unappreciated by the false prophets of globalist
capitalism, always on the lookout for fresh lands to reduce to a bland
and hence profitable mass - or mess.
When Muslims, like those 'extremist' Iranians, reject the societies
(perhaps non-societies might be a better term) of Britain and the US,
are they really wrong to do so? Or are they just being sensible in not
wanting a taste of the growing gap between rich and poor, the drug
addiction, the sleaze, the corruption, the social breakdown, the urban
gun crime and trash TV that more and more characterises these two
countries today?
Significantly, terms such as Ummah and Dar-al-Islam are more or less
untranslatable, indicating a degree of cohesion and comradely
brotherhood that those outside the Arabic and Muslim world can barely
understand.
Though few of us realise it, we in the West are spoon-fed a bogus view
of reality: the truth only comes out in peripheral areas. Times,
Telegraph and Observer dribble on and on about the wonderful EU
constitution, or how we must 'democratise' Iraq1. However in the
travel sections of such papers you can still read the occasional
comment on the wonderful hospitality to be found in Libya or Syria, in
spite of everything that happened in recent years.
Apparently, tourists there can find themselves being invited, after a
passing acquaintance with a citizen of those 'evil' countries, to stay
and eat in private homes. Just try doing that in New York or London!
As Gavin Maxwell wrote of his stay in pre-Saddam and pre-American
Apocalypse Iraq :
'Throughout our journey I was struck by the boorishness of Western
hospitality by contrast with that of the Arabs. If a stranger rings a
doorbell in Europe, he must produce some very good reason before he
can get into the house at all, much less eat there as a guest; yet in
the lands where there are neither doors nor doorbells the stranger is
not asked the reason for his presence, and to hesitate in setting food
before him would be
shameful.'...
As is clear from the Last Sermon of the Last Prophet, true Islam has a
civilised attitude towards woman...:
'O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your
women, but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have
taken them as your wives only under Allah's trust and with His
permission. If they abide by your right then to them belongs the right
to be fed and clothed in kindness. Do treat your women well and be
kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers. And it
is your right that they do not make friends with any one of whom you
do not approve, as well as never to be unchaste. '...
America today, in line with its stultifying decay, hardly produces any
new contributors to the world of thought. Though scarcely comparable
to Mencken or Brooks Adams, the present-day philosophic duo of Beavis
and Butthead have it right: 'People are STUPID'.
Yes, people are stupid, especially modern Britons or Americans. They
are pleased to accept assessments of one of the world's great
religions from various self-interested parties with an axe to grind -
from tame professors run by the intelligence agencies, to
fundamentalist 'Christian' Zionist nutcases who want to bring on
Armageddon...
As for Muslims and Arabs in general, they can take some small comfort
from the words of Beregond, the soldier of Gondor, in Tolkien's Lord
of the Rings: 'We have this honour: ever we bear the brunt of the
chief hatred of the Enemy.'
Topaz
Compiled by Jeffrey Blankfort
12-6-4
MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and
chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American
Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.
LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David
Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory
Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers,
appointed by Clinton.
JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner
NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News
JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC
DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News
SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, "world's biggest media giant"
(Economist, 11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the
world, Blockbuster video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.
MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News of the
World (Jewish mother)
MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS
DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS
JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS
DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning, CBS
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment
BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.
SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman of
Paramount Pictures' Motion Picture Group.
HARVEY WEINSTEIN, CEO. Miramax Films.
BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp.,
owner of Fox TV
MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly
identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his
"mentor."
ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times, the Boston Globe
and other publications.
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post.
Honored by Honest Reporting.com, website monitoring "anti-Israel
media."
RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post
JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe
NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for USA
Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the
Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV
Producers, appointed by Clinton.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an expert on
domestic terrorism.
DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times
network of "alternative weeklies."
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund
KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle
East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker
BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal
Entertainment
KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which
represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer
and Bill O'Reilly.
TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.
MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL
WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL-
TimeWarner
JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment
JACK MYERS, NBC, chief.NYT 5.14.2
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks
LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment
JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment
MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America
AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures
JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann's American operations
ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications
BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment
IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live
TED KOPPEL, host of ABC's Nightline
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes
BARBARA WALTERS, Host, ABC's 20-20
MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review
BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week
DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of
CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post
HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director
Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle
PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,
RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San
Francisco) Syndicated in 100 markets
MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has
Israeli flag on his home page.
BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.
ANDREW LACK, president of NBC
DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins
DAVID REZNIK, Editor, The New Yorker
NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York
HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker
SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications,
includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group,
includes The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement;
American City Business Journals, business newspapers published in more
than 30 major cities in America; and interests in cable television
programming and cable systems serving 1 million homes.
DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated Press.
PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron's
RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV.
LAWRENCE KIRSHBAUM, CEO, AOL-Time Warner Book Group
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>Jewish control of the media
Muslime try to control the world, including their own kind:
MUSLIMS WIPING OUT ALGERIAN WOMEN, CHILDREN, WHOLE FAMILIES
Iron in the Soul
Al-Qaeda unleashes a wave of violence in North Africa
Few countries have suffered as much from terrorism as Algeria. For
more than a decade after the aborted elections in 1992 Islamist
extremists waged a bloodthirsty war against the state, targeting
women, children, market places and even whole villages. Families were
rounded up and had their throats slit. People were burnt alive in
their homes. The Islamic Salvation Front and Armed Islamic Groups
(GIA) used extreme brutality to drive out foreigners, intimidate the
population and virtually close down normal life in the cities. In all,
about 200,000 people were killed, as the shadowy military authorities
answered the attacks with bloody reprisals and a crackdown on civil
liberties.
Only in the past three or four years has Algeria begun to emerge from
the violence that engulfed what was once one of Africa’s most
industrialised and developed economies. The bombs that killed 30
people in the capital yesterday have raised, therefore, immediate
fears across the region that the terrorists, now openly affiliated
with al-Qaeda, are preparing to mount a deadly campaign across North
Africa. The virus of Islamist extremism is far from defeated.
There have been plenty of warning signs in recent months. In January
the main terrorist organisation, the Salafist Group for Preaching and
Combat, changed its name and deepened its ties to al-Qaeda. Since then
it has claimed responsibility for a new wave of attacks targeting the
security forces and foreigners. Meanwhile, the Army has stepped up
operations against insurgents in the mountains east of Algiers. Five
days ago nine soldiers and at least six Islamist militants were killed
when a military convoy was ambushed west of the capital. Nor is
Algeria alone in struggling to contain terrorism. Tunisia faces a
similar challenge from Islamist groups, and in Morocco yesterday
police were hunting ten possible suicide bombers in Casablanca, a day
after three suspected militants blew themselves up as the police
closed in. All were wanted in connection with the bombing of an
internet café last month.
The Maghreb is fertile ground for extremists posing as devout Muslims.
Burgeoning populations, high unemployment, inefficient but repressive
governments and a lack of press and civic freedoms have all fuelled
popular frustration. The region is rich in oil and gas resources, has
a fertile littoral and enormous tourist potential. But poverty is
widespread, education levels are low and economic development has been
stultified by bureaucracy and corruption. Opposition has been driven
underground and, as in 1992 when the Algerian military staged a putsch
to prevent Islamic groups assuming power, religious extremists have
gained influence.
North Africa is an obvious haven for al-Qaeda, under pressure in the
Middle East, where governments have targeted its leadership. The
Maghreb is also close to Western Europe. Extremists have been able to
set up cells among the large numbers who have migrated, often
illegally, to Spain, France and Italy. France, with strong historical
ties to its former colony, has been shocked by the renewed violence:
the threat to its own security was underlined this week by the
announcement than an Algerian will stand trial later this year for
alleged complicity in the 1995 Paris métro bombings. As Britain has
found, to its cost, Algerian terrorists have been active across
Western Europe. We are vulnerable to their attacks and must be both
vigilant and very supportive of the people of North Africa.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>Why is Islam so feared and derided today?
That's an easy one:
MUSLIME SAY THAT ISLAM IS THE *ONLY* RELIGION THAT CAN EXIST
Gaddafi says only Islam a universal religion By Salah Sarrar
Fri Mar 30, 5:24 PM ET
AGADEZ, Niger (Reuters) - Libyan leader
Muammar Gaddafi said on Friday that it was a mistake to believe that
Christianity was a universal faith alongside Islam.
"There are serious mistakes -- among them the one saying that Jesus
came as a messenger for other people other than the sons of
Israel," he told a mass prayer meeting in Niger.
"Christianity is not a faith for people in Africa, Asia, Europe and
the Americas. Other people who are not sons of Israel have nothing to
do with that religion," he said at the prayer meeting, held to mark
the birth of the prophet Mohammed.
Gaddafi, who is seeking to expand his influence in Africa, said his
arguments came from the Koran. He led similar prayers last year in
Mali.
"It is a mistake that another religion exists alongside Islam. There
is only one religion which is Islam after Mohammed," he said in the
sermon, which was broadcast live on Libyan state television.
"All those believers who do not follow Islam are losers," he added.
"We are here to correct the mistakes in the light of the teachings of
the Koran."
Gaddafi also said it was a mistake to believe that Jesus had been
crucified and killed. "It is not correct to say that. Another man
resembling Jesus was crucified in his place."
Libya grants financial aid to Islamic communities in Africa and
elsewhere to build mosques, Islamic schools and facilities.
Libyan state television often shows Gaddafi meeting groups of African
men or women telling him they converted to Islam.
The mass prayers, chaired by Gaddafi, came a day after Arab leaders
wrapped up a summit in Saudi Arabia. Libya was the only Arab state to
shun the gathering.
"Libya has turned its back on the Arabs ... Libya is an African
nation. As for Arabs, may God keep them happy and far away," Gaddafi
has said to explain his boycott of the summit.
____________
Topaz
Topaz
The Culture War:
Israel Line - Friday, June 10, 2005
Thousands Participate in Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv.
Thousands of people took to the streets of Tel Aviv this
afternoon to participate in the city's annual gay pride parade,
HA'ARETZ reported. The parade set out from Rabin Square and was to end
in Yarkon Park, where musical performances were planned.
MKs Yosef Lapid (Shinui), Eitan Cabel (Labor) and Zehava Gal-On
(Yahad), as well as Tel Aviv Mayor Ron Huldai, were set to speak at
the event.
The chairman of the national Association of Gay Men, Lesbians,
Bisexuals and Transgender in Israel, Mike Hamel, said today the parade
was organized with the "close cooperation" of the Tel Aviv
municipality. "It's great to see it, and great that it's one of the
few places in the world that has the support of a municipal body, a
government body," he said.
Hamel said the event is called a "pride parade," because it has
to do with "being proud of the way we are and the demand to accept
every person as a person, as he is, and not trying to change him."
Full story:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/586950.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
- -- - -- -
http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/1122-03.htm
Iran: Two More Executions for Homosexual Conduct
NEW YORK - November 22 -
Iran's execution of two men last week for homosexual conduct
highlights a
pattern of persecution of gay men that stands in stark violation of
the rights
to life and privacy, Human Rights Watch said today. On Sunday,
November 13, the semi-official Tehran daily Kayhan reported that the
Iranian
government publicly hung two men, Mokhtar N. (24 years old) and Ali A.
(25 years old), in the Shahid Bahonar Square of the northern town of
Gorgan. The government reportedly executed the two men for the crime
of "lavat." Iran's shari'a-based penal code defines lavat as
penetrative and non-penetrative sexual acts between men. Iranian law
punishes all penetrative sexual acts between adult men with the death
penalty.
Non-penetrative sexual acts between men are punished with lashes until
the fourth offense, when they are punished with death…
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
-
NEA, Gay Militants: Joined At The Hip
Lee Duigon
If a private citizen tells his neighbor's children that they ought to
try gay sex, he might wind up in a correctional facility. If he talks
that way to your 13-year-old son, you'll want him put away-pronto.
But when this very same behavior, toward the same children, is
displayed by adults who belong to America's biggest teachers' union,
most parents simply let them do it. In fact, they pay them to.
The NEA is committed to the cause of militant homosexuality. It's the
richest, most politically powerful union in America, and it has daily
access to most of America's children. And it wants to recruit them for
the homosexual lifestyle.
Lean this equation, America:
Public schools=The homosexual agenda
If you don't believe it, visit nea-glc.org/, the website of the
National Education Association's Gay and Lesbian Coalition. There,
among their "great achievements" in shaping NEA policy, the homosexual
militants cite the NEA's promotion of "the lesbian-gay-bisexual
curriculum" and "family life education... regarding the diversity of
sexual orientation."
The NEA has also campaigned for the proclamation of
"Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transsexual History Month" (try putting that on
a T-shirt), homosexual studies at Catholic colleges--and, of course,
homosexual "marriage."
The people of Massachusetts know the teachers' union's commitment to
"gay marriage." Aline Isaacson of GLSEN (Gay-Lesbian-Straight
Education Network), the media's favorite poster gal for "gay
marriage", is also--surprise!-a paid consultant to the Massachusetts
teachers' union. Paid in taxpayer dollars, to boot. (You may remember
Massachusetts GLSEN from a few years ago as the organizers of graphic,
intensely perverted sex "workshops" for public school children--a
scandal that came to be known as "fist-gate.")
Ms. Isaacson, according to the grass-roots Article 8 Alliance, these
days makes it a full-time job lobbying state legislators to keep them
from jumping ship on "gay marriage" and voting for the Bill of Address
which would remove the outlaw Supreme Judicial Court judges who
imposed this oxymoron on the people of Massachusetts. Supported by
taxpayers' money, she makes daily, face-to-face visits to individual
lawmakers. Nice work if you can get it.
Too bad you couldn't make it to the gym teachers' state convention in
New Jersey, in February. It wasn't about volleyball. For public school
gym teachers, Job One--according to the convention's floor displays,
handouts, posters, and workshop topics (all of which I saw
personally)--is getting the kids comfy with homosexuality. To this
end, they handed out a "resource guide"--handsomely produced, slick,
paid for largely by Fleet Bank
Inc.--intended for distribution in all the public schools. (For more
information, see my article, "Now It's the Gym Teachers," in the
February archive of the Chalcedon website, chalcedon.edu.)
You would have seen even more of the same at "Twenty Years of Great
Sex (Ed)" last year, a national conference of "sex educators" hosted
by Rutgers, New Jersey's taxpayer-funded state university. Again,
there was no effort to hide the educators' whole-hearted penchant for
homosexuality...
waybackjack
wrote:
>Why is Islam so feared and derided today?
Easy question.
waybackjack
wrote:
>
> The Culture War:
7th century Islam from the East.
Advanced civilization of the West.
My money's on the latter.
Topaz
>
>MUSLIME SAY THAT ISLAM IS THE *ONLY* RELIGION THAT CAN EXIST
>
I sat in a church where they we saying Christianity should take over
the world. That is how it is with true believers. But the religious
are the largest groups that are against the homosexual perverts, the
feminists, and other liberalism. The sad part is that they are quick
to demonize other religious views even though these other religions
may also be against the homosexual perverts, the feminists, and other
liberalism.
In the past is was the same thing with the Catholics and Protestants
killing each other. Millions of people were killed for have the
"wrong" beliefs. There must have been some people saying, Maybe we can
come to some understanding? But there were a lot of Way Back types.
I like religions that are against the homosexual perverts, the
feminists and other liberalism but clearly there is a problem with
religion. That is why a political party is better. Here are some
quotes from Mein Kampf:
"Anyhow, the Jew has attained the ends he desired. Catholics and
Protestants are fighting with one another to their hearts content,
while the enemy of Aryan humanity and all Christendom is laughing up
his sleeve."
"the Jew trafficked in the freedom of the nation and sold our
country to the masters of international high finance. So in our day he
has succeeded again, this time by raising ructions between the two
German religious denominations while the foundations on which both
rest are being eaten away and destroyed through the poison injected by
the international and cosmopolitan Jew."
Topaz
>> The Culture War:
>
>7th century Islam from the East.
>
>Advanced civilization of the West.
>
>My money's on the latter.
So this is what you must be for:
GAY MILITANT INTENT: OUR KIDS
From Concerned Women From America
by Beverly LaHaye
Dear Concerned American,
What I am about to tell you in this letter is so outrageous you may
find it hard to believe. I was astounded myself. I could not believe
that our nation had fallen so far. But the reports here are true. I
have warned many times that our children are under attack. Now I'm
writing to sound the alarm that the situation is even worse than I
thought. I'll tell you more details in a moment, but here's just a
sample of what I've discovered:
Cross-dressing promoted to grade-school children Graphic instruction
in "gay" sex taught to teenage boys and girls Armed guards posted to
keep parents out of high school assemblies led by radical homosexual
activists A book - published by a taxpayer-funded university - that
endorses sex between children and adults!
I've warned about this for many years. Now the evidence is beyond
dispute: there is an evil scheme aimed at destroying our children. The
attack comes on many fronts. It aims to expose children to sex at
earlier and earlier ages... to rob them of their innocence and open
them up to immoral and unhealthy practices... to set them up to accept
messages of
"safe sex" and homosexuality... to usher them into becoming advocates
for - and ultimately participants in - sexual promiscuity, sodomy,
bisexuality, and transgenderism.
These reports confirm my worst fears about this scheme. The time is
short! Radical homosexual activists have long said, "Whoever controls
the schools, controls the future." If they can convince the next
generation that homosexuality is "just another lifestyle," there will
be no stopping them. Even more chilling: If they can lure a whole
generation of young people to explore "alternative" sexual behavior...
to discover their "gay side"...
they will have a whole new generation of young, willing sex partners.
Their first step is to promote gender confusion. Nothing I have ever
seen promises to confuse kids more than a lesson guide obtained and
given to me by one of the researchers here at CWA.
GRADE SCHOOL LESSON PROMOTES CROSS-DRESSING The Gay, Lesbian, and
Straight Education Network, also known as "GLSEN, is pushing a
grade-school curriculum book that promotes cross-dressing. This book
was created by a homosexual parents group at the Buena Vista
Elementary School in San Francisco. It includes a lesson based on a
children's book titled "Jesse's Dream Skirt."
As incredible as it sounds, this is real! The story is about a young
boy named Jesse who likes trying on his mother's dresses, and dreams
of a skirt "that whirled, twirled, flowed and glowed, and felt soft
inside." Jesse's mom helps him make a skirt, and he wears it to
daycare, where his classmates make fun of him. The daycare teacher,
Bruce, gathers the
children together and says, "Jesse loves his skirt. Why are some of
you making fun of him?" A girl says, "Well, I wear pants. Why can't
Jesse wear a skirt?"
A boy, Mike, says that one day his mother let him dress up in her old
dresses and hats. "It was a lot of fun," he said, until his father
came in and yelled at him, saying, "Take off that dress, I don't want
my son to be a sissy!" Mike told his daycare classmates, "I don't
know, - I still don't see what was wrong with it." The children and
their teacher discuss the issue and most of the children end up liking
Jesse's skirt. Some even start making dresses themselves. The book
ends with Jesse twirling around in his "dream skirt," with his
boy-style underwear showing. The companion lesson plan says the "key
message" of "Jesse's Dream Skirt" is: "Respect means keeping our minds
open. Having open minds means giving people freedom to be who they
want to be." I don't know what's worse: encouraging boys to wear
dresses, or the negative portrayal of Mike's father. Children who
study "Jesse's Dream Skirt" are getting the message that their
parents' view of morality cannot be trusted. Lest you think this sort
of insanity is restricted to California, take a loot at this next
report, straight from the Midwest. Armed Security Guard Ejects Mother
of Student from School Assembly on Homosexuality
This really made me angry when I heard about it! The incident took
place in St. Louis, Missouri last year just after school had started
for fall. Debra Loveless, whose daughter attends Metro High School,
heard that GLESEN was conducting a school-sponsored assembly. Loveless
had told school officials that she considered the event inappropriate.
When she tried to view it for herself, she was escorted out of the
assembly by an armed security guard. (Just for wanting to view it!)
Can you believe the arrogance of those school administrators! We may
never know all of what those dear young people were exposed to during
that assembly. But if GLSEN's past performance is any indication, the
material was corrupting an destructive. GLESEN has produced some of
the most foul "educational" material in the dishonorable history of
sex education. Two years ago, CWA uncovered a pornographic teaching
session conducted in Massachusetts by GLSEN. During that workshop,
homosexual instructors indoctrinated children as young
as 14 years old. The children heard detailed descriptions of
perverted sex acts, including the dangerous practice known in
homosexual slang as "fisting." After it was exposed, that session
sparked outrage across the nation. It was such a scandal that it
became known as "Fistgate." GLSEN leaders responded by becoming much
more secretive. Apparently this has led them to keep parents out of
their workshops like the one in St. Louis.
So it has come to this. Our tax dollars foot the bill for homosexual
propaganda to poison our children's minds and defile their hearts.
And when parents want to find out what's going on, they get thrown out
of public schools by armed guards! It's time for parents and
grandparents to stand up and fight to protect our children. We can't
think that just because it hasn't happened in our school yet that it
never will! The radical homosexual activists won't stop with just the
California schools. They won't stop with just the big city
schools. They won't stop until they have reached every school in the
nation.
DANGEROUS NEW BOOK PROVIDES ACADEMIC "COVER" FOR PEDOPHILES AND CHILD
MOLESTERS
The University of Minnesota Press has just published Judith Levine's
Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex. This
book includes such outrageous statements as, "Sex is not harmful to
children... There are many ways even the smallesst children can
partake of it."
On another page, the author gushes over a "lush and mysterious" photo
of a "naked 3- or 4-year-old." Quoting a variety of pedophiles,
Levine says children are not necessarily harmed by sex with adults.
She also advocates that America adopt a law like Holland's that
legalizes sex between adults and children as young as 12! It's
unbelievable, but this book is defended by the liberal media elite.
I'm shocked and heartbroken. But we should not be surprised.
America's standards of sexual morality have been belittled as
"taboos," and been worn down step by step. Today, almost nothing is
off limits. Sex between adults and children is just the next barrier
to be torn down. How long will it take these radical activists to
achieve their next evil objective? Our grade-school children are
already being taught that cross-dressing is just wonderful
self-expression. Graphic details of perverted sex practices are
already being taught to high school children, and parents are being
locked out of assemblies taught by radical homosexual activists. We
must - and we can - stop this. NOW! I grieve for our children and
grandchildren. And I fear for our nation if we do not stand up to
this assault of immorality and defeat it...
I've learned that GLSEN now boasts a budget of 3.5 million and a
membership of more than 1,200 homosexual-activist educators. Their
mission is to promote homosexuality and gender confusion in the
schools under any guise that works.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
> I sat in a church where they we saying Christianity should take over
>the world.
I'm sitting in a world where ALL Muslime religious leaders are saying
the same thing AND their faithful are trying to do it.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>GAY MILITANT INTENT: OUR KIDS
HOMOSEXUALITY IN ISLAM
Islam has the effect of denying Muslim boys and girls the opportunity
to develop their sexuality in a normal, wholesome fashion. The public
mixing of sexes is prohibited by Islam although it may be tolerated by
the secular governments of most Muslim nations. Denied the opportunity
to have normal heterosexual experiences during adolescence and
frequently the victims of sexual abuse by male relatives while they
were growing up it is no wonder that Muslims are much more likely than
infidels to find romance and sexual gratification in homosexual
relationships. The following excerpt from a piece published in a gay
and lesbian publication gives one a notion of Muslim sexuality in
Saudi Arabia.
"Ibrahim bin Abdullah bin Ghaith, the head of the religious police
(the Committee for the Prevention of Vice and the Promotion of Virtue)
acknowledged, in unusually tempered language, that there are gay
Saudis, while also speaking of the need "to educate the young" about
this "vice". But he denied media reports that gay and lesbian
relationships were the norm in the strictly segregated schools and
colleges, that homosexuality "is spreading".
In an unprecedented two-page special investigation, the daily
newspaper Okaz said lesbianism was "endemic" among schoolgirls. It
justified the article with a saying of the Prophet's wife Ayeshathat
"there should be no shyness in religion". The article told of lesbian
sex in school lavatories, girls stigmatised after refusing the
advances of their fellow students, and teachers complaining that none
of the girls were willing to change their behaviour.
Mr Ghaith dismissed a suggestion that he should send his "enforcers"
to investigate. Armed with sticks, they routinely hunt down men and
women in public they suspect may not be directly related. "This
perversion is found in all countries," he told Okaz. "The number [of
homosexuals] here is small ..." That assessment is contradicted by
teachers and students who say that, in the absence of other outlets, a
"gay" subculture has inevitably flourished among youth.
"A particularly beautiful boy always gets top marks in the exams
because he's some teacher's favourite," said Mohammed, an English
teacher in a government high school in Riyadh. "On the other hand, I
know many older boys who deliberately flunked their final exams so
they can stay ... with their younger sweethearts."
Ahmed, 19, a student at a private college in Jeddah, said there was no
shame in having a boyfriend in his private high school. Although he
firmly rejected the label "gay", he admitted that he now has a
"special friend" in college, too. "It's those who don't have a boy who
are ashamed to admit it. We introduce our boy to our friends as 'al
walid hagi' [the boy who belongs to me]. At the beginning of term, we
always check out the new boys to see which are the most 'helu' [sweet]
and think of ways to get to know them."
Gay marriage is not the contemporary invention of decadent Western
civilization. The Egyptian city of Siwa has for centuries legitimized
and celebrated marriages between Muslim men. No other community has
done more to suppress heterosexual behavior thereby making
homosexuality the norm. A gay cruising guide to Siwa provides both
historical background and tips on finding gay sex partners in that
city -- truly a no-brainer. Gay marriage is also practiced in
Afghanistan. News reports documenting that fact and others about
rampant Afghan homosexuality can be found here. Paradoxical though it
may be, Islam calls for the severe punishment of homosexuality while
at the same time working diligently to make that forbidden practice
more attractive. An excellent analysis can be found here.
If you have a particular interest in the Islamic persecution of
homosexuals al-bab.com is a good place to pursue it further. As this
form of barbarity is inflicted on Muslims by Muslims and is relatively
rare I will not dwell on the matter much further. The overwhelming
majority of homosexuals who have been murdered by Muslims died because
they were infidels. Count the millions murdered and multiply by
whatever percentage incidence of homosexuality you fancy. You will get
a very, very large number in return.
_ G O D _
"COck-sucker Jack" wrote
news:46544b4a...@news.prodigy.net...
Why do you need to go so far, looking for fags,
Jack, if your priest is most likely to be a homo?
_ G O D _
news:46544b30...@news.prodigy.net...
> Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I sat in a church where they we saying
>> Christianity should take over the world.
>
>
> I'm sitting in a world where ALL Muslime religious leaders
Well, you bad for them. Because the world is
already got its bible. Which is neither of their...
RTFM
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>"COck-
No, none for you, or your mom.
Way Back Jack
>>
>>>GAY MILITANT INTENT: OUR KIDS
>>
>> HOMOSEXUALITY IN ISLAM
>
>
>Why do you need to go so far, looking for fags,
As long as you're around, I don't.
Topaz
Well, there wouldn't be "Brokeback Mountain" in the movie theaters.
It looks like it would be a big improvement.
Why is Islam so feared and derided today?
Topaz
Jack) wrote:
>
>HOMOSEXUALITY IN ISLAM
Islamic countries outlaw it.
http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/1122-03.htm
Iran: Two More Executions for Homosexual Conduct
NEW YORK - November 22 -
Iran's execution of two men last week for homosexual conduct
highlights a
pattern of persecution of gay men that stands in stark violation of
the rights
to life and privacy, Human Rights Watch said today. On Sunday,
November 13, the semi-official Tehran daily Kayhan reported that the
Iranian
government publicly hung two men, Mokhtar N. (24 years old) and Ali A.
(25 years old), in the Shahid Bahonar Square of the northern town of
Gorgan. The government reportedly executed the two men for the crime
of "lavat." Iran's shari'a-based penal code defines lavat as
penetrative and non-penetrative sexual acts between men. Iranian law
punishes all penetrative sexual acts between adult men with the death
penalty.
Non-penetrative sexual acts between men are punished with lashes until
the fourth offense, when they are punished with death…
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
Topaz
"Who are the kosher conservatives?
A kosher conservative is a right winger who understands the
undemocratic power of Jews in America, and who have decided to lick
Jewish feet rather than fight BIG BROTHER. Kosher conservatives in
reality do not give a damn about Jews or Israel, but they lick Jewish
feet in order to gain success in the Jewish owned corporation we call
America. Kosher conservatives would be happy if the illegal cult
commune known as Israel suddenly disappeared from the face of the
earth, but they support the Zionist cult because opposing the cult is
too dangerous and personally costly.
Two prominent examples of kosher conservatives are radio talk show
hosts Rush Limbaugh and Michael Reagan. Neither man cares about
anything much except money, and would club baby seals or suck your
brains out with a straw if they could make a profit from it.
So we have three main categories of players in the Jewish controlled
mess that we pretend is a "democracy."
1) The "Neoconservatives" are true believer Zionists like
William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Firth, Newt Gingrich, Scooter
Libby, George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Jerry Falwell. They planned,
promoted, and started our illegal wars in Iraq and continue to push
our government to illegally bomb Iran and Syria. The Neoconservative
cult is made up of Right Wing Zionist Jews and Right Wing Zionist
Christians. You do not have to be Jewish to be either a Zionist or a
Neoconservative. Many Neoconservatives are Evangelical Christians,
but others are Mormons, like Oregon Senator Gordon Smith.
2) The "stealth Jews" are Zionist Jews who try to hide the fact
they are Jewish, and who owe their loyalty to Israel, not America.
This category includes Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch and Web
propagandist, Matt Drudge. Both Drudge and Murdoch are doing
everything they can to promote Israeli interests and to whip up war
hysteria over Iran's nuclear program. Some stealth Jews are
Neoconservatives like Matt Drudge and Rupert Murdoch, while other
stealth Jews are Zionist liberal Jews like former Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright and current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi,
both of whom pretend to be Catholic.
3) The kosher conservatives are the pure whores, the bottom of
the barrel. They believe in money and sell-out to whoever is in
power. Kosher Conservatives climb on the money train and have no
significant non-financial core beliefs."
IB
inkyblacks
Jack
wrote:
>On Wed, 23 May 2007 14:09:07 GMT, retired...@home.net (Way Back
>Jack) wrote:
>
>>
>>HOMOSEXUALITY IN ISLAM
>
> Islamic countries outlaw it.
Muslim men practice it.
Jack
wrote:
>On Wed, 23 May 2007 14:08:37 GMT, retired...@home.net (Way Back
>Jack) wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 23 May 2007 08:49:45 -0500, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I sat in a church where they we saying Christianity should take over
>>>the world.
>>
>>
>>I'm sitting in a world where ALL Muslime religious leaders are saying
>>the same thing AND their faithful are trying to do it.
>
> Well, there wouldn't be "Brokeback Mountain" in the movie theaters.
>It looks like it would be a big improvement.
No, the movie theaters would have women walking around wearing black
tents.
>Why is Islam so feared and derided today?
Let me count the ways. Here's one:
Jack
wrote:
>
>"Who are the kosher conservatives?
Jews who are not afraid to kill Muslims?
Like the ones killing Hamas as we speak?
Topaz
"i am a radical muslim please read my blog, read how islam will win
the clash of civilization."
http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha
Topaz
"Witnesses watched as more than 60 Palestinian shops were bulldozed to
the ground this week in one West Bank village, while the owners stood
by and watch helplessly. But not one American in ten saw or heard
about this in the US press. An educated American pro-life activist was
surprised to disbelief when I told him that the Israeli death losses
run about one-fourth the number or Palestinians killed by Israelis. He
thought the statistics were reversed, having never heard or seen a
count in the US press, he has been brain scrubbed. Misinformation by
the US press is not excusable in the Internet age. So Israel has
provided an Orwellian propaganda filter called the Israeli Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (IMFA) that makes it all possible. It provides the
convenient excuse the US press needs to look the other way and print
abridged stories, keeping most of us ignorant. The propaganda arm of
the Israeli military has once again been caught purposefully lying
about the death count among its forces. We believe their purpose in
doing this is to condition Americans into accepting Israel's use of
American-made weapons of mass destruction against the vulnerable
civilian population in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's willing
facilitator is the US Media, which spreads their distorted stories in
the USA. This same pattern of misrepresentation is repeated again and
again, proving how important and routine propaganda is to Israel. On
December 5th, the IMFA released an account of two suspected sacrifice
bombers (wrongly called suicide bombers*) who allegedly killed 22
persons and wounded more than 100. But the press release failed to
mention that there were also Israeli military casualties in the raid.
Furthermore, their account omitted the fact that a female army
sergeant was among the killed. The omission is significant. It fits
perfectly into the predictable pattern of how the IMFA deceives
Americans almost daily. This practice repeatedly uses almost every
report of Israeli deaths to distort the facts of their conflict with
the Palestinians. We will now teach you how to read between the lies
and know when the story is distorted.
THE PATTERN OF DECEPTION
On November 19, 2002, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (IMFA)
re-manufactured a similar story about a Palestinian sacrifice raid on
a military target. Twelve Israeli soldiers and paramilitary fighting
men were killed and there was no collateral damage (civilians dead).
The propagandists changed the "facts" to call the raid a "Massacre of
innocent (Israeli) civilians," as the story was carried in the US
press. It is a total and complete bald-faced lie which We Hold These
Truths alone corrected it in our article: U. S. Media, Caught Lying...
Again http://www.whtt.org/articles/021224.htm
This writer put the facts together from the Israeli military's own
documents one month after the event was misreported. Do you, dear
reader, know how to recognize such lies for yourself so you don't have
to wait for us to unravel it for you? To do this one must first
understand the quaint language of the IMFA. We call these lies
"z-facts" (short for Zionist facts) meaning lies that are couched in
official, narrative sounding language but are indeed untrue. Here is
how the Hebron report was distorted by z- facts, which the Media
reported as rear facts. The first release from the IMFA read:
"THE TERROR ATTACK IN HEBRON CLAIMED 12 LIVES." and "PALESTINIAN
GUNMEN" had opened fire on "JEWISH WORSHIPPERS WALKING HOME FROM
RELIGIOUS SERVICES,"
Z-facts differ from bald-faced lies because they do not state outright
all the killed or wounded are civilians, but it is clearly implied.
(In those rare cases where everyone killed are indeed civilian, the
IMFA says so and saves its lies for a later day.) The truth is told
only if it suits the teller. By calling an attack on an armed military
unit a "terror attack" on "Jewish worshipers" and "claiming 12 lives,"
the z-facts leave the a clear impression that those killed were
civilians. Any honest account would have called it "an attack on
Israeli military unit by Palestinian guerillas" etc. In our previous
article we explained the procedure as follows: "The Israeli Ministry
of Foreign Affairs is a propaganda arm of the Israeli Defense Force
(IDF). --They are the first to know who is killed. But they cause the
story to be circulated that all killed were civilians because it
serves their purpose. Then, once the misinformation has reached the
American public, the corrected story is allowed to surface in Israel,
though the false images are never corrected in the eyes of the
American public." http://www.whtt.org/articles/021224.htm (please
forgive us for quoting ourselves, but we are the best source)
In January 5th story Israel did it again. This time every one of our
readers should have detected the lie without being told. The press in
both countries used the same predictable, deceptive language. Each
stated "22 Israelis" had been killed and many more wounded. Had all
those killed or wounded had been non-military the report would most
likely have called them "civilians." The generic term "Israelis"
suggest to us that the IMFA is hiding something, not wanting to
identify who was really killed. They were.
Later the same day, a sad corrected story was carried with the names
of those killed. The IMFA stated that all of the victims had been
identified and included Staff Sgt. Mazal Orkobi of Azor. Ha'aretz
subsequently revealed in an obituary that Sgt. Orkobi was a 20 year-
old female who was on her first day of active duty with the Israeli
Defense Forces. But this part of the story never reached the USA. Nor
can we find a disclosure as to how many of the 120 wounded were
military. As usual, the IMFA did not disclose those who were in the
active reserves but not on duty at the time of death...
But because military were killed and possibly wounded, no
one can conclude they targeted civilians. In all but a few sacrifice
bombings military are killed or wounded. The IMFA had two reasons for
keeping Sergeant Orkobi's name out of the print. They can garner
sympathy for their air raids if the American public believes the
sacrifice bombers are targeting civilians only. Israel kills
Palestinian civilians by the dozens and do not even bother to
apologize.
The second reason Israel keeps Sergeant Orkobi's name out of
American's minds is that most do not know that Israeli's draft their
girls and puts them in harms way. If American Christians knew about
the mistreatment of Israeli women, including the use of Military-paid
abortion as a birth control method, many would wonder about their
unquestioned support of the Israeli war machine.
Christian Israeli Patriots such as Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham and
Jerry Falwell, who Ariel Sharon calls the Christian Zionists, might be
embarrassed to explain their undying devotion to a regime which drafts
women into combat, marches them hip to hip with men, and provides free
abortions for the resulting problems. Some might wake up and actually
wonder if boys and girls are conditioned to kill and torture
Palestinian including children. Israel and a complicit US Media solve
these twin problems by doctoring press releases with false statements
that omit the loss of military personnel in guerilla raids. Female
names are never associated with the military even though they make up
about 1/3 of the total draftees.
* ("Suicide bomber:" Suicide is the act of taking ones one life for
the purpose of ending it. Sacrifice bombers have never been shown to
have a desire to stop living; their motive is to find and destroy
enemy personal regardless of the cost. Thus the term "sacrifice
bombers" is more accurate in describing them. The former is an Israeli
propaganda label. )
REFERENCES LITERATURE FROM WHTT: Israel's policy of abusing its own
women is detailed in two previous articles by this author. "THE
EMBARRASSING ABUSE OF WOMEN IN ISRAEL'S WAR AGAINST MEN" Charles E
Carlson (http://www.whtt.org/articles/020607.htm ) and "ISRAEL'S
SLAUGHTER OF ISRAELIS ABORTION AND A DOUBLE-MINDED PEOPLE" By Se·n D.
Mac an Airchinnigh (http://www.whtt.org/rpr/021104.htm)
FROM OUR BOOKSTORE: http://www.whtt.org/bookstor.htm For the truth
about the Occupied Territories: THE PEOPLE AND THE LAND, by
award-winning photographer Tom Hayes. Perhaps the most important
documentary ever made about Israel and Palestine. The Public
Broadcasting Corporation paid for this film, then refused to air it.
An unforgettable documentation of bravery which exposes the brutality
and repression by the Israeli military. Filmed in Gaza, The West Bank,
and Haifa at great risk to the film crew and Palestinian civilians. A
film for those who are seeking the truth about the war of rocks
against rifles, bombs vs. tanks. Show this to your church or Bible
Study. One hour, professional quality. T-101 $25.00
(http://www.whtt.org/bookstor.htm)
Read SPECIAL REPORT: SHERRY'S WAR, the anatomy of grassroots Christian
heresy. This Report is based on correspondence with Christian laymen
about their beliefs and what they consider a mandate to support the
State of Israel, regardless of the harm it does, including genocide.
Sherry is a mother, concerned for her fellow humans, and a model
church-attendee, but Sherry is also a warrior. She knows what Jesus
said about loving one's neighbors and even enemies. But her
correspondence reveals she can not bring herself to love the
Palestinians. Sherry's cult of Christianity causes her to believe that
there is a "militant Islamic agenda" to eliminate both Christians and
"God's chosen people." Sherry supports Israel's actions without
question, because she believes it is scriptural and prophetic. Sherry
could be the lady (or man) sitting next to us every Sunday in church,
perhaps sharing your breakfast table, and often at the pulpit of your
church. This article examines the flawed logic and biblical
misinformation that transform this soccer mom into an instrument for
war and death. A 20-page Pamphlet "October, 2001 report" $6.00. Volume
Discounts
SPECIAL REPORT: THE SOURCE OF OUR WAR PROBLEM: WHY JUDEO-CHRISTIANS DO
NOT DEMAND PEACE, A How a convicted serial forger was used to falsify
and corrupt the Christian Bible. The role of the Oxford University
Press owned Scofield Reference Bible in controlling Christian thought,
effectively creating Christian Zionism from the ranks of emerging
evangelicalism, and how it was transformed into radical anti-Islamic
bias. Special attention is given to the role of the Southern Baptist
Convention and of prominent televangelists. This report may be the
first to compare the several successive editions of the Scofield
Reference Bible since 1908, and to demonstrate a pernicious pro-Israel
political bias inserted between the lines of the respected King James
Edition. It makes a strong case for laying the responsibility for the
Mideast wars upon the leadership of American churches. A must for
Pastors and leaders. Audio Tape and hard copy.
Book: One Nation Under Israel - by Andrew Hurley. Former United States
Senator J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, stated repeatedly in 1973, "Israel controls the
(U.S.) Senate". Fulbright soon became a "former Senator". Chapter 10
has a character study of terrorist now President, Ariel Sharon.
President George H.W. Bush admitted in a media interview in 1991 that
he had been virtually blackmailed to grant a $10 billion dollar loan
guaranty to the State of Israel, compliments of the American
taxpayers. He described his contact as an agent of "AIPAC... a very a
very strong Jewish lobby", ... Mr. Bush later approved the loan
without objection from Congress. 345 page soft cover $17.50.
Audiotape: ISRAEL'S SETTLEMENTS IN THE WEST BANK - by Cesar Aharon
with C. E. Carlson, explains how the present violence was caused by
the creation of the Israelis by forcing armed squatters to hold Arab
territory. $6.00
Audiotape: SHIREEN FROM GAZA - C. E. Carlson's taped interview of this
young Muslim English Student in Gaza City, who tells of the lives and
hope of the Palestinian family caught up in a war they do not want,
and are powerless to stop. Mr. Carlson provides an account of his
visit to Gaza, where the five were in March, 2002, focusing on the
family and the so called "suicide bombers." This vital question is
asked and answered: do Muslim parents train children for war and body
bomb raids as the American and Israeli press claim?"
We Hold These Truths (http://www.whtt.org)
P.O. Box 14491 Scottsdale, AZ
85267 480-947-3329
Topaz
Lean this equation, America:
Public schools=The homosexual agenda
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
Jack
wrote:
>
>"Witnesses watched as
Muslims machine-gunned a classroom of Russian schoolchildren and
MUSLIME LEADER SAYS NO MEMORIAL TO RUSSIAN SCHOOLCHILDREN WHOM MUSLIMS
MASSACRED
Beslan memorial plan angers Russian Muslim leader
04 Apr 2007 14:18:01 GMT
Source: Reuters
By Christian Lowe
MOSCOW, March 4 (Reuters) - Plans to build a memorial to the 333
hostages killed three years ago in the Beslan school siege have
sparked a row between Christians and Muslims in Russia.
The local Russian Orthodox diocese says it will build a church in the
grounds of Beslan's school No. 1 to commemorate the victims -- half of
them children -- killed in a clash between insurgents and Russian
troops.
But one of Russia's leading Muslim clerics has accused the Orthodox
church of trying to hijack a national tragedy by building a memorial
that he said would exclude the more than 20 million Muslims who live
in the country.
"It is not acceptable to present this tragedy as the tragedy of
followers of only one religion," Sheikh Ravil Gainutdin, chairman of
the Council of Russian Muftis, said in a statement.
"We need a monument on this site that symbolises a national tragedy,
without any religious undertones, where everyone can come and shed
their tears."
Gainutdin is an outspoken Muslim leader in Russia, and other senior
clerics have not spoken out about the memorial plans.
But the row has exposed faultlines between the communities which,
despite a conflict between Moscow and rebels in Muslim Chechnya, have
had largely smooth relations. Russia is home to the biggest Muslim
community in Europe.
Wrangling over the memorial could also aggravate already raw divisions
between Muslims and Christians in the volatile North Caucasus region
that includes Beslan.
Beslan and the area around it have a majority Christian population and
many of them blame their Muslim neighbours for the bloodbath: the
hostage-takers were Islamist militants from Chechnya and the
neighbouring Muslim region of Ingushetia.
BESLAN'S CHOICE
The local Russian Orthodox diocese said it plans to build the church
next to the school sports hall, the spot where many of the hostages
died after a bomb fixed to a basketball hoop went off, triggering a
massive gunbattle.
A spokesman for the diocese said a church was the memorial that the
people of Beslan had chosen.
"It is not a case of someone coming along and taking this decision. It
is the decision of the people who were hostages and whose children
died ... and it should be respected," said spokesman Yevgeny Bronsky.
Asked about Muslims' reaction to the plan he said: "We have not
noticed this issue dividing anyone in Beslan."
The administration of the North Ossetia region, of which Beslan is a
part, contradicted the church, saying consultations on what form the
memorial would take were still being conducted.
"The people of Beslan ... will review the proposed options and will
make the final choice," it said in a statement.
Since the tragedy, the wrecked shell of the sports hall has become a
makeshift shrine, with candles on the floor and photographs of the
victims pinned to the walls. Some victims' relatives say it should be
preserved as a permanent memorial.
Jack
wrote:
>NEA, Gay Militants: Joined At The Hip
More evidence of Muslime homosexuality and misogyny:
MUSLIME MASSACRE OF WOMEN
Women break silence on honour killings
Print
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 18/04/2007
Reporter: David Hardaker
A group of women in the Israeli city of Ramle has broken the code of
silence on a string of honour killings within the city's Arab
community. For one woman, it has meant giving police the evidence to
charge her own son for murdering her daughter.
Transcript
KERRY O'BRIEN: Now, a powerful story of family honour killings in the
Arab community of a small Israeli city named Ramle. Where such
killings are usually accompanied by an unbreakable code of silence, in
Ramle, after a string of deaths, a group of women has broken ranks.
For one woman, it has meant giving police the evidence to charge her
own son for murdering her daughter.
Middle East Correspondent David Hardaker reports.
DAVID HARDAKER: This is the area of Joh Arish (phonetic), a tough Arab
neighbourhood with a tradition of killing.
HAIM SCHREIBHAND, DETECTIVE, RAMLE POLICE: In this house, two girls in
the family have been murdered.
DAVID HARDAKER: The Abu Ghanem family runs this part of town and has
been killing its women in the name of honour. In all, eight young
women have been murdered here in the last six years. The crimes and
the killers protected by a code of silence.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA, RAMLE POLICE: You come to a crime scene like
this and all you meet is people which doesn't want to covert with you,
doesn't want to talk, doesn't want to say what they saw, what they
heard, what they know. They're just like ignoring the police. They are
even ignoring the body.
DAVID HARDAKER: Limor Yehuda is part of a small police unit
investigating the honour killings of Joh Arish. The area is part of an
area of Ramle, in Israel, a mixed city of Muslims and Jews. It's a
city where traditional Arab culture collides with the 21st century and
where women who've looked the wrong way have paid with their lives.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: It is terrible to know that in the era of 2007
and such terrible murders happen. Women that get murdered for the way
they dressed or the way they talked, maybe because they talked on the
phone with someone or looked at some guy or even didn't look at some
guy, for stupid, stupid reasons or for no reason.
DAVID HARDAKER: Last year, 19-year-old Reem Abu Ghanem was murdered.
Her crime was to turn her back on the man that her family had picked
for her to marry and fall for another. Her killer turned out to be her
older brother, a respected paediatrician who Reem had trusted for
protection. He smothered Reem in a cloth soaked with anaesthetic drugs
from his hospital. He believed he'd killed her. His four brothers
threw her body into the boot of a car. They drove to a field on the
outskirts of town to a deserted and derelict house, where they would
dispose of her down an old well, but when they arrived, it turned out
that Reem was not dead after all.
So she was still alive. Do you know, did they do anything at that
point before throwing her in?
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: Yeah, yeah. After she cried, after she begged
for her life, they used a stone to hit her on the head. And then she
was still alive, she didn't die from the injury. And she was then
thrown out into the well like this. Alive, semi-injured, bleeding, I
guess. It's terrible. It's so cruel, so vicious. But to throw someone
alive when is your relatives, your own flesh and blood, right? It's,
it's very, very difficult to bear.
DAVID HARDAKER: For weeks, no-one breathed a word of what happened
that night.
DR AUNI KHIL, RAMLE COMMUNITY: Some of the community see the killers
as hero. True, as hero. And they are dealing with them as heroes and
this is very, very bad.
DAVID HARDAKER: Dr Auni Khil is part of Ramle's Arab community and
he's been working to stop honour killings, and he is not surprised
that Reem Abu Ghanem's killer was a doctor. As far as he's concerned,
the killings are all about power in a male-dominated society.
DR AUNI KHIL: I think that there is the education in the university
and there is the human being. The connection between the two things
not in this case, there is no connection.
DAVID HARDAKER: Reem's older brother was arrested after a tip-off from
a prison informant. Despite the crime, the women of Joh Arish remained
silent until the killing this year of another of their number. Hamda
Abu Ghanem, also 19, was shot in the head nine times, as she lay in
her bed upstairs alone in her house. Her killer was her own brother.
This time, the women broke their silence. For the Ramle police, it was
extraordinary.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: Wow - huge, huge step. When we are talking
about this murder case, it's like a big step because we learned that
among the years, there were like eight murders in the same family, Abu
Ghanem family. The women are getting murdered one by one. All of a
sudden, we're all like in shock - they decided to talk.
DAVID HARDAKER: The woman that went to the police was Imama Abu
Ghanem, the mother of Hamda. She gave police the evidence to charge
her own son.
IMAMA ABU GHANEM (translation): In the Koran, there is no order,
murder your sister, and I've asked my son, “Why didn't you put the
rest of your bullets in your own head?”
DAVID HARDAKER: Imama Abu Ghanem had lost everything and had nothing
more to lose by speaking to the police.
IMAMA ABU GHANEM (translation): Over there where there are Christians,
it's OK. Nobody bothers anyone. The war is in our own homes, not in
the neighbourhood, really.
DAVID HARDAKER: It seems her daughter knew she would die.
IMAMA ABU GHANEM (translation): She knew, yes, but she was afraid to
tell me. He called her "garbage" and said, "I'll get you, Hamda”. She
said, "What are you waiting for?"
DAVID HARDAKER: What do you think about what she has done?
DR AUNI KHIL: Look, I think this is a very, very important step
against the killing ceremony but she's now in really danger, and I
hope that nobody will be able to touch her.
DAVID HARDAKER: Imama Abu Ghanem's move may have been a small triumph
but another woman who gave evidence to police has been missing for
close to a month and may be dead. Hamda Abu Ghanem's name is to be
carried on by the women of the Joh Arish. Hamda's sister-in-law has
just given birth to a baby girl. She tells Israeli policeman Haim
Schreibhand her name is Hamda. It's intended as an act of defiance.
But the tradition of killing is far from dying out. Men here keep a
blacklist of the names of bad women and the police know to expect more
bad news any time. The city's religious leaders and other community
leaders have started to speak against honour killings but it's hardly
enough.
DR AUNI KHIL: We have to try to start some action against this killing
and we are trying to enter to the school or to the Arab schools here
in Ramle to do something to educate, to learn the children that the
women are our mothers, our sisters, our wives and daughters.
DAVID HARDAKER: It is a bit dangerous, isn't it? Because you are
posing a threat to this established small community?
DR AUNI KHIL: Yes, there is a danger, some dangers, but somebody must
say, “Stop, stop with these killings”.
DAVID HARDAKER: Limor Yehuda believes honour killings are a twisted
version of killing and that it's time for Arab leaders to act.
INSPECTOR LIMOR YEHUDA: There is leadership, a religious and a
scholarly leadership in the Arabic community and they should do more.
They can progress this idea of fighting against this terrible,
terrible phenomena. And they should do more. They shouldn't just talk.
KERRY O'BRIEN: As I said, a powerful story. And the reporter, David
Hardaker.
Jack
wrote:
>Here is a Muslim's website. It's mostly pictures:
Here's a better website, containing pictures and charts of Muslim
savagery against civilians all over the world.
Topaz
They could show stories of Jeffrey Dahmer and of other White people
and they could have a lot of stories. They could fail tell you about
all the Blacks crimes, (which they do, the excuse being it would be
"controversial"). They could easily paint a very dark picture of White
people.
But they would especially want to show cases of Whites trying to
"take over", which is what we are trying to do. All the former White
nations have White nationalists who want a White nation. You could
list every one of them and say that Whites are trying to "take over".
And we are.
White nationalists break very few laws. When one of us does, it gets
front page news and the public TV watchers think White nationalists
are criminals. That is just one example. And why does it get front
page news? Is it because of the Muslims or because of the Jews?
But, you may object, the Muslims do a lot more terrorism than White
Nationalists. True, but they have a lot more people. They have
millions of people. How many do we have? We may have gotten a lot of
votes in France for example, but there isn't nearly as many White
activists as Muslim activists.
And why are White nationalists so law abiding? Is it because we
think revolution is wrong in principle and the Jewish controlled
government does not deserve to be overthrown? Not at all. We reject
revolution simply because it would fail and we would all be arrested.
The point is that the biggest enemies of White people are at the
top. True, we wouldn't want to be in a dark alley at night in a Black
neighborhood. But this alley is not where our powerful enemies are.
Our powerful enemies are running the TV stations and putting their
puppets in the White house. Our powerful enemies are the Jews.
Topaz
his forces were involved in the siege. He condemned the action and all
attacks against civilians via a statement issued by his envoy Akhmed
Zakayev, currently resident in London. Aslan Maskhadov later on
November 1 called Shamil Basayev a terrorist for his involvement in
the Beslan crisis."
I don't know if this next one is true, but there have been black psyop
operations before.
"The unique basketball hoop bombs inside the sealed gymnasium, which
confirmed for ever that Beslan was a black psyop atrocity perpetrated
by the west. Despite all western reporters being contained 100 yards
behind the Russian Special Forces perimeter outside the sealed
compound, and despite the terrorists within immediately confiscating
all cellphones from the teachers and children, the BBC magically
described these specific unique booby traps live-to-air before Special
Forces had even penetrated the inner cordon at Beslan. Western media
reporters could not possibly have known"
Here is how much you can trust your Jewish controlled media:
"I ask you to consider the following:
Imagine if the rulers of a Mideast nation such as Syria, and I am not
simply speaking about a gang of radicals in that nation, but the
actual government ministers of this Mideast nation, launched terrorist
attacks against American civilian installations. Imagine if the
Syrian Government sent terrorists into Egypt to firebomb American
theaters and libraries and treacherously plotted to blame the attacks
on Egypt so that the United States would go to war against that
nation.
If successful, the treacherous plan would harm America even more than
the terrorist attacks themselves, because even more American blood and
treasure would be spilled in a devastating war on an innocent nation!
Imagine that the premature explosion of the one of the Syrian agent's
bombs led to the capture of all the Syrian operatives and ultimately
caused a complete exposure of Syria's terrorism against America. In
fact, imagine that the failed plot became so exposed that the Syrian
Defense minister had to resign.
How do you think the United States would respond to these acts of
terrorism committed against Americans by the Syrian government? Would
not at the very least America make military strikes at Syrian
installations?
Remember, that without Iraq committing even a single warlike act
against the United States, America invaded Iraq and spent hundreds of
billions of dollars and suffered great numbers of dead and wounded.
Again, how would America respond to any Mideast nation that clearly
made terrorist attacks against American civilian installations? After
such dastardly terrorist attacks would the American people send
billions of dollars in aid including military weapons to Syria? After
such attacks, how would every Congressman be viewed that took money
from Lobby organizations that support the Syrian government? Would
they not be attacked in the press, would they not be properly accused
of disloyalty to the United States, perhaps even treason? Imagine
that due to the ubiquitous pro-Syrian political and media power in
America that amazingly no actions were taken against Syria and that
military and other aid to Syria continued. And finally, imagine that
years after the attacks, the President of Syria in an open, public
ceremony gives awards to the Syrian terrorists who bombed American
installations and calls them "heroes." Do you think a free press would
keep such an obscene ceremony from the knowledge of the American
public? Or do you think that the Syrian Government's praising of
terrorists who attacked America would unleash a huge scandal and
uproar.
Well, everything I just described to you actually has happened, and I
mean in every detail.
Except it wasn't the Syrian government that launched terrorist attacks
on America, it was Israel.
In the Lavon Affair, the Israeli government sent terrorists to bomb
American installations in Egypt and blame the Egyptians for it. One of
their bombs exploded prematurely which led to the capture of one the
agents and eventually the rounding up of all of them. They confessed
and the Israeli Defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign
because of the failure and exposure of this Israeli treachery. This
is no fantasy; this is absolute historical fact which you can verify
from numerous major historical sources, including leading Jewish
sources.
Only thing is, you probably haven't even heard of it.
Why not?
And why would America continue to give military weapons and equipment
to a nation that launched terrorist attacks against us? What does
that tell you about Israeli influence over the American government and
the press?"
David Duke
www.davidduke.com
Topaz
The Culture War:
Israel Line - Friday, June 10, 2005
Thousands Participate in Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv.
Thousands of people took to the streets of Tel Aviv this
afternoon to participate in the city's annual gay pride parade,
HA'ARETZ reported. The parade set out from Rabin Square and was to end
in Yarkon Park, where musical performances were planned.
MKs Yosef Lapid (Shinui), Eitan Cabel (Labor) and Zehava Gal-On
(Yahad), as well as Tel Aviv Mayor Ron Huldai, were set to speak at
the event.
The chairman of the national Association of Gay Men, Lesbians,
Bisexuals and Transgender in Israel, Mike Hamel, said today the parade
was organized with the "close cooperation" of the Tel Aviv
municipality. "It's great to see it, and great that it's one of the
few places in the world that has the support of a municipal body, a
government body," he said.
Hamel said the event is called a "pride parade," because it has
to do with "being proud of the way we are and the demand to accept
every person as a person, as he is, and not trying to change him."
Full story:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/586950.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
- -- - -- -
http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/1122-03.htm
Iran: Two More Executions for Homosexual Conduct
NEW YORK - November 22 -
Iran's execution of two men last week for homosexual conduct
highlights a
pattern of persecution of gay men that stands in stark violation of
the rights
to life and privacy, Human Rights Watch said today. On Sunday,
November 13, the semi-official Tehran daily Kayhan reported that the
Iranian
government publicly hung two men, Mokhtar N. (24 years old) and Ali A.
(25 years old), in the Shahid Bahonar Square of the northern town of
Gorgan. The government reportedly executed the two men for the crime
of "lavat." Iran's shari'a-based penal code defines lavat as
penetrative and non-penetrative sexual acts between men. Iranian law
punishes all penetrative sexual acts between adult men with the death
penalty.
Non-penetrative sexual acts between men are punished with lashes until
the fourth offense, when they are punished with death…
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
-
NEA, Gay Militants: Joined At The Hip
Revilio Oliver
Topaz mars...@hotmail.com said:
<text snipped>
Here are some brief thoughts from Mein Kamph. Consider yourself a race traitor
and a Jew lover if you haven't memorized them by now.
"Den gewaltigsten Gegensatz zum Arier bildet der Jude. Bei kaum einem Volke
der Welt ist der Selbsterhaltungstrieb stärker entwickelt als beim
sogenannten auserwählten. Als bester Beweis hierfür darf die einfache
Tatsache des Bestehens dieser Rasse allein schon gelten. Wo ist das Volk, das
in den letzten zweitausend Jahren so wenigen Veränderungen der inneren
Veranlagung des Charakters usw. ausgesetzt gewesen wäre als das jüdische?
Welches Volk endlich hat größere Umwälzungen mitgemacht als dieses ? und ist
dennoch immer als dasselbe aus den gewaltigsten Katastrophen der Menschheit
hervorgegangen? Welch ein unendlich zäher Wille zum Leben, zur Erhaltung der
Art spricht aus diesen Tatsachen!Die intellektuellen Eigenschaften des Juden
haben sich im Verlaufe der Jahrtausende geschult. Er gilt heute als
"gescheit" und war es in einem gewissen Sinne zu allen Zeiten. Allein sein
Verstand ist nicht das Ergebnis eigener Entwicklung, sondern eines
Anschauungsunterrichtes durch Fremde. Auch der menschliche Geist vermag nicht
ohne Stufen zur Höhe emporzuklimmen; er braucht zu jedem Schritt nach
aufwärts das Fundament der Vergangenheit und zwar in jenem umfassenden Sinne,
in dem es sich nur in der allgemeinen Kultur zu offenbaren vermag. Alles
Denken beruht nur zum geringen Teile auf eigener Erkenntnis, zum größten aber
auf den Erfahrungen der vor. hergegangenen Zeit. Daß allgemeine Kulturniveau
versorgt den einzelnen Menschen, ohne daß es dieser meistens beachtet, mit
einer solchen Fülle von Vorkenntnissen, daß er, so gerüstet, leichter weiter
eigene Schritte machen kann. Der Knabe von heute zum Beispiel wächst unter
einer wahren Unmenge technischer Errungenschaften der letzten Jahrhunderte
auf, so daß er vieles, das vor hundert Jahren noch den größten Geistern ein
Rätsel war, als selbstverständlich gar nicht mehr beachtet, obwohl es für ihn
zum Verfolgen und Verstehen unserer Fortschritte auf dem betreffenden Gebiete
von ausschlaggebender Bedeutung ist. Würde selbst ein genialer Kopf aus den
zwanziger Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts heute plötzlich sein Grab verlassen,
so wäre sein auch nur geistiges Zurechtfinden in der jetzigen Zeit schwerer,
als dies für einen mittelmäßig begabten fünfzehnjährigen Knaben von
heute der Fall ist. Denn ihm würde all die unendliche Vorbildung fehlen, die
der Zeitgenosse von heute wahrend seines Aufwuchses inmitten der
Erscheinungen der jeweiligen allgemeinen Kultur sozusagen unbewußt in sich
aufnimmt.
Da nun der Jude ? aus Gründen, die sich sofort ergeben werden ? niemals im
Besitze einer eigenen Kultur war, sind die Grundlagen seines geistigen
Arbeitens immer von anderen gegeben worden. Sein Intellekt hat sich zu allen
Zeiten an der ihn umgebenden Kulturwelt entwickelt.
Niemals fand der umgekehrte Vorgang statt.
Denn wenn auch der Selbsterhaltungstrieb des jüdischen Volkes nicht kleiner,
sondern eher noch größer ist als der anderer Völker, wenn auch seine
geistigen Fähigkeiten sehr leicht den Eindruck zu erwecken vermögen, daß sie
der intellektuellen Veranlagung der übrigen Rassen ebenbürtig wären, so fehlt
doch vollständig die allerwesentlichste Voraussetzung für ein Kulturvolk, die
idealistische Gesinnung.
Der Aufopferungswille im jüdischen Volke geht aber den nackten
Selbsterhaltungstrieb des einzelnen nicht hinaus. Das scheinbar große
Zusammengehörigkeitsgefühl ist in einem sehr primitiven Herdeninstinkt
begründet, wie er sich ähnlich bei vielen anderen Lebewesen auf dieser Welt
zeigt. Bemerkenswert ist dabei die Tatsache, daß Herdentrieb stets nur so
lange zu gegenseitiger Unterstützung führt, als eine gemeinsame Gefahr dies
zweckmäßig oder unvermeidlich erscheinen läßt. Das gleiche Rudel Wölfe, das
soeben noch gemeinsam seinen Raub überfällt, löst sich bei nachlassendem
Hunger wieder in seine einzelnen Tiere auf. Das gleiche gilt von den Pferden,
die sich des Angreifers geschlossen zu erwehren suchen, um nach überstandener
Gefahr wieder auseinanderzustieben.
Ähnlich verhält es sich beim Juden. Sein Aufopferungssinn ist nur ein
scheinbarer. Er besteht nur so lange, als die Existenz jedes einzelnen dies
unbedingt erforderlich macht. Sobald jedoch der gemeinsame Feind besiegt, die
allen drohende Gefahr beseitigt, der Raub geborgen ist, hört die scheinbare
Harmonie der Juden untereinander auf, und den ursächlich vorhandenen Anlagen
wieder Platz zu geben. Der Jude ist nur einig, wenn eine gemeinsame Gefahr ihn
dazu zwingt oder eine gemeinsame Beute lockt; fallen beide Gründe weg, so
treten die Eigenschaften eines krassesten Egoismus in ihre Rechte, und aus dem
einigen Volk wird im Handumdrehen eine sich blutig bekämpfende Rotte von
Ratten.
Wären die Juden auf dieser Welt allein, so würden sie ebensosehr in Schmutz
und Unrat ersticken wie in haßerfülltem Kampfe sich gegenseitig zu
übervorteilen und auszurotten versuchen, sofern nicht der sich in ihrer
Feigheit ausdrückende restlose Mangel jedes Aufopferungssinnes auch hier den
Kampf zum Theater werden ließe.
Es ist also grundfalsch, aus der Tatsache des Zusammenstehens der Juden im
Kampfe, richtiger ausgedrückt in der Ausplünderung ihrer Mitmenschen, bei
ihnen auf einen gewissen idealen Aufopferungssinn schließen zu wollen.
Auch hier leitet den Juden weiter nichts als nackter Egoismus des einzelnen.
Daher ist auch der jüdische Staat ? der der lebendige Organismus zur
Erhaltung und Vermehrung einer Rasse sein soll ? territorial vollständig
unbegrenzt. Denn eine bestimmte räumliche Fassung eines Staatsgebildes setzt
immer eine idealistische Gesinnung der Staatsrasse voraus, besonders aber
eine richtige Auffassung des Begriffes Arbeit. In eben dem Maße, in dem es an
dieser Einstellung mangelt, versagt auch jeder Versuch zur Bildung, ja sogar
zur Erhaltung eines räumlich begrenzten Staates. Damit entfällt jedoch die
Grundlage, auf der eine Kultur allein entstehen kann.
Daher ist das jüdische Volk bei allen scheinbaren intellektuellen
Eigenschaften dennoch ohne jede wahre Kultur, besonders aber ohne jede
eigene. Denn was der Jude heute an Scheinkultur besitzt, ist das unter seinen
Händen meist schon verdorbene Gut der anderen Völker.
Als wesentliches Merkmal bei der Beurteilung des Judentums in seiner Stellung
zur Frage der menschlichen Kultur muß man sich immer vor Augen halten, daß es
eine jüdische Kunst niemals gab und demgemäß auch heute nicht gibt, daß vor
allem die beiden Königinnen aller Künste, Architektur und Musik, dem Judentum
nichts Ursprüngliches zu verdanken haben. Was es auf dem Gebiete der Kunst
leistet, ist entweder Verbalhornung oder geistiger Diebstahl. Damit aber
fehlen dem Juden jene Eigenschaften, die schöpferisch und damit kulturell
begnadete Rassen auszeichnen.
Wie sehr der Jude nur nachempfindend, besser aber verderbend fremde Kultur
übernimmt, geht daraus hervor, daß er am meisten in der Kunst zu finden ist,
die auch am wenigsten auf eigene Erfindung eingestellt erscheint, der
Schauspielkunst. Allein selbst hier ist er wirklich nur der "Gaukler", besser
der Nachäffer; denn selbst hier fehlt ihm der allerletzte Wurf zur wirklichen
Größe; selbst hier ist er nicht der geniale Gestalter, sondern äußerlicher
Nachahmer, wobei alle dabei angewendeten Mätzchen und Tricks eben doch nicht
aber die innere Leblosigkeit seiner Gestaltungsgabe hinwegzutäuschen
vermögen. Hier hilft nur die jüdische Presse in liebevollster Weise nach,
indem sie aber jeden, aber auch den mittelmäßigsten Stümper, sofern er eben
nur Jude ist, ein solches Hosiannageschrei erhebt, daß die übrige Mitwelt
endlich wirklich vermeint, einen Künstler vor sich zu sehen, während es sich
in Wahrheit nur um einen jammervollen Komödianten handelt.
Nein, der Jude besitzt keine irgendwie kulturbildende Kraft, da der
Idealismus, ohne den es eine wahrhafte Höherentwicklung des Menschen nicht
gibt, bei ihm nicht vorhanden ist und nie vorhanden war. Daher wird sein
Intellekt niemals aufbauend wirken, sondern zerstörend und in ganz seltenen
Fällen vielleicht höchstens aufpeitschend, dann aber als das Urbild der
"Kraft, die stets das Böse will und stets das Gute schafft". Nicht durch ihn
findet irgendein Fortschritt der Menschheit statt, sondern trotz ihm.
Da der Jude niemals einen Staat mit bestimmter terri- torialer Begrenzung besaß
und damit auch nie eine Kultur sein eigen nannte,
entstand die Vorstellung, als handle es sich hier um ein Volk, das in die
Reihe der Nomaden zu rechnen wäre. Dies ist ein ebenso großer wie
gefährlicher Irrtum. Der Nomade besitzt sehr wohl einen bestimmt umgrenzten
Lebensraum, nur bebaut er ihn nicht als seßhafter Bauer, sondern lebt vom
Ertrage seiner Herden, mit denen er in seinem Gebiete wandert. Der äußere
Grund hierfür ist in der geringen Fruchtbarkeit eines Bodens zu sehen, der
eine Ansiedlung einfach nicht gestattet. Die tiefere Ursache aber liegt im
Mißverhältnis zwischen der technischen Kultur einer Zeit oder eines Volkes
und der natürlichen Armut eines Lebensraumes. Es gibt Gebiete, in denen auch
der Arier nur durch seine im Laufe von mehr denn tausend Jahren entwickelte
Technik in der Lage ist, in geschlossenen Siedlungen des weiten Bodens Herr
zu werden und die Erfordernisse des Lebens aus ihm zu bestreiten. besäße er
diese Technik nicht, so müßte er entweder diese Gebiete meiden oder ebenfalls
als Nomade in dauernder Wanderschaft das Leben fristen, vorausgesetzt, daß
nicht seine tausendjährige Erziehung und Gewöhnung an Seßhaftigkeit dies für
ihn einfach unerträglich erscheinen ließe. Man muß bedenken, daß in der Zeit
der Erschließung des amerikanischen Kontinents zahlreiche Arier sich ihr
Leben als Fallensteller, Jäger usw. erkämpften, und zwar häufig in größeren
Trupps mit Weib und Kind, immer herumziehend, so das ihr Dasein vollkommen
dem der Nomaden glich. Sobald aber ihre steigende Zahl und bessere
Hilfsmittel gestatteten, den wilden Boden auszuroden und den Ureinwohnern
standzuhalten, schossen immer mehr Siedlungen in dem Lande empor.
Wahrscheinlich war auch der Arier erst Nomade und wurde im Laufe der Zeit
seßhaft, allein deshalb war er doch niemals Jude! Nein, der Jude ist kein
Nomade; denn auch der Nomade hatte schon eine bestimmte Stellung zum Begriffe
"Arbeit", die als Grundlage für eine spätere Entwicklung dienen konnte,
sofern die notwendigen geistigen Voraussetzungen hierzu vorhanden waren. Die
idealistische Grundanschauung aber ist bei ihm, wenn auch in unendlicher
Verdünnung, gegeben, daher erscheint er auch in seinem ganzen Wesen den
arischen Völkern vielleicht fremd, allein nicht unsympathisch. Bei den Juden
hingegen ist diese Einstellung überhaupt nicht vorhanden; er war deshalb auch
kein Nomade,
sondern immer nur Parasit im Körper anderer Völker. Daß er dabei manchmal
seinen bisherigen Lebensraum verläßt, hängt nicht mit seiner Absicht
zusammen, sondern ist das Ergebnis des Hinauswurfes, den er von Zeit zu Zeit
durch die mißbrauchten Gastvölker erfährt. Sein Sich-Weiterverbreiten aber
ist eine typische Erscheinung für alle Parasiten; er sucht immer neuen
Nährboden für seine Rasse.
Dies hat aber mit Nomadentum deshalb nichts zu tun, weil der Jude gar nicht
daran denkt, ein von ihm besetztes Gebiet wieder zu räumen, sondern bleibt,
wo er sitzt, und zwar so seßhaft, daß er selbst mit Gewalt nur mehr sehr
schwer zu vertreiben ist. Sein Ausdehnen auf immer neue Länder erfolgt erst
in dem Augenblick, in dem dort gewisse Bedingungen für sein Dasein gegeben
sind, ohne daß er dadurch ? wie der Nomade ? seinen bisherigen Wohnsitz
verhindern würde. Er ist und bleibt der ewige Parasit, ein Schmarotzer, der
wie ein schädlicher Bazillus sich immer mehr ausbreitet, sowie nur ein
günstiger Nährboden dazu einlädt. Die Wirkung seines Daseins aber gleicht
ebenfalls der von Schmarotzern: wo er auftritt, stirbt das Wirtsvolk nach
kürzerer oder längerer Zeit ab.
So lebte der Jude zu allen Zeiten in den Staaten anderer Völker und bildete
dort seinen eigenen Staat, der allerdings so lange unter der Bezeichnung
"Religionsgemeinschaft" maskiert zu segeln pflegte, als die äußeren Umstände
kein vollständiges Enthüllen seines Wesens angezeigt sein ließen. Glaubte er
sich aber einmal stark genug, um der Schutzdecke entbehren zu können, dann
ließ er noch immer den Schleier fallen und war plötzlich das, was so viele
andere früher nicht glauben und sehen wollten: der Jude.
Im Leben des Juden als Parasit im Körper anderer Nationen und Staaten liegt
eine Eigenart begründet, die Schopenhauer einst zu dem schon erwähnten
Ausspruch veranlaßte, der Jude sei der "große Meister im Lügen". Das Dasein
treibt den Juden zur Lüge, und zwar zur immerwährenden Lüge, wie es den
Nordländer zur warmen Kleidung zwingt.
Sein Leben innerhalb anderer Völker kann auf die Dauer nur währen, wenn es
ihm gelingt, die Meinung zu er. wecken, als handle es sich bei ihm um kein
Volk, sondern um eine, wenn auch besondere "Religionsgemeinschaft".
Dies ist aber die erste große Lüge.
Er muß, um sein Dasein als Völkerparasit führen zu können, zur Verleugnung
seiner inneren Wesensart greifen. Je intelligenter der einzelne Jude ist, um
so mehr wird ihm diese Täuschung auch gelingen. Ja, es kann so weit kommen,
daß große Teile des Wirtsvolkes endlich ernstlich glauben werden, der Jude
sei wirklich ein Franzose oder Engländer, ein Deutscher oder Italiener, wenn
auch von besonderer Konfession. Besonders staatliche Stellen, die ja immer
von dem historischen Bruchteil der Weisheit beseelt zu sein scheinen, fallen
diesem infamen Betrug am leichtesten zum Opfer. Das selbständige Denken gilt
in diesem Kreisen ja manchmal als eine wahre Sünde wider das heilige
Fortkommen, so daß es einen nicht wundernehmen darf, wenn z. B. ein
bayerisches Staatsministerium auch heute noch keine blasse Ahnung davon
besitzt, daß die Juden Angehörige eines Volkes sind und nicht einer
"Konfession", obwohl nur ein Blick in die dem Judentum eigene Zeitungswelt
dies selbst dem bescheidensten Geist sofort aufzeigen müßte. Allerdings ist
das "Jüdische Echo" ja noch nicht das Amtsblatt und folglich für den Verstand
eines solchen Regierungspotentaten unmaßgeblich.
Das Judentum war immer ein Volk mit bestimmten rassischen Eigenarten und
niemals eine Religion, nur sein Fortkommen ließ es schon frühzeitig nach
einem Mittel suchen, das die unangenehme Aufmerksamkeit in bezug auf seine
Angehörigen zu zerstreuen vermochte. Welches Mittel aber wäre zweckmäßiger
und zugleich harmloser gewesen als die Einschiebung des geborgten Begriffs
der Religions- gemeinschaft? Denn auch hier ist alles entlehnt, besser
gestohlen ? aus dem ursprünglichen eigenen Wesen kann der Jude eine religiöse
Einrichtung schon deshalb nicht besitzen, da ihm der Idealismus in jeder Form
fehlt und damit auch der Glaube an ein Jenseits vollkommen fremd ist. Man kann
sich aber eine Religion nach arischer Auffassung nicht vorstellen, der die
Überzeugung des Fortlebens nach dem Tode in irgendeiner Form mangelt.
Tatsächlich ist auch der Talmud kein Buch der Vorbereitung für das Jenseits,
sondern nur für ein praktisches und erträgliches Leben im Diesseits.
Die jüdische Religionslehre ist in erster Linie eine Anweisung zur
Reinhaltung des Blutes des Judentums sowie zur Regelung des Verkehrs der
Juden untereinander, mehr aber noch mit der übrigen Welt, mit den Nichtjuden
also. Aber auch hier handelt es sich keineswegs um ethische Probleme, sondern
um außerordentlich bescheidene wirtschaftliche. Über den sittlichen Wert des
jüdischen Religionsunterrichtes gibt es heute und gab es zu allen Zeiten
schon ziemlich eingehende Studien (nicht jüdischerseits; die Schwafeleien der
Juden selber darüber sind natürlich dem Zweck angepaßt), die diese Art von
Religion nach arischen Begriffen als geradezu unheimlich erscheinen lassen.
Die beste Kennzeichnung jedoch gibt das Produkt dieser religiösen Erziehung,
der Jude selber. Sein Leben ist nur von dieser Welt, und sein Geist ist dem
wahren Christentum innerlich so fremd, wie sein Wesen es zweitausend Jahre
vorher dem großen Gründer der neuen Lehre selber war. Freilich machte dieser
aus seiner Gesinnung dem jüdischen Volke gegenüber kein Hehl, griff, wenn
nötig, sogar zur Peitsche, um aus dem Tempel des Herrn diesen Widersacher
jedes Menschentums zu treiben, der auch damals wie immer in der Religion nur
ein Mittel zur geschäftlichen Existenz sah. Dafür wurde dann Christus
freilich an das Kreuz geschlagen, wahrend unser heutiges Parteichristentum
sich herabwürdigt, bei den Wahlen um jüdische Stimmen zu betteln und später
mit atheistischen Judenparteien politische Schiebungen zu Vereinbaren sucht,
und zwar gegen das eigene Volkstum.
Auf dieser ersten und größten Lüge, das Judentum sei nicht eine Rasse,
sondern eine Religion, bauen sich dann in zwangsläufiger Folge immer weitere
Lügen auf. Zu ihnen gehört auch die Lüge hinsichtlich der Sprache des Juden.
Sie ist ihm nicht das Mittel, seine Gedanken auszudrücken, sondern das
Mittel, sie zu verbergen. Indem er französisch redet, denkt er jüdisch, und
während er deutsche Verse drechselt, lebt er nur das Wesen seines Volkstums
aus.
Solange der Jude nicht der Herr der anderen Völker geworden ist, muß er wohl
oder übel deren Sprachen sprechen, sobald diese jedoch seine Knechte waren,
hätten sie alle eine Universalsprache (z. B. Esperanto!) zu lernen, so daß
auch durch dieses Mittel das Judentum sie leichter beherrschen könnte!Wie
sehr das ganze Dasein dieses Volkes auf einer fortlaufenden Lüge beruht, wird
in unvergleichlicher Art in den von den Juden so unendlich gehaßten
"Protokollen der Weisen von Zion" gezeigt. Sie sollen auf einer Fälschung
beruhen, stöhnt immer wieder die "Frankfurter Zeitung" in die Welt hinaus:
der beste Beweis dafür, daß sie echt sind. Was viele Juden unbewußt tun
mögen, ist hier bewußt klargelegt. Darauf aber kommt es an. Es ist ganz
gleich, aus wessen Judenkopf diese Enthüllungen stammen, maßgebend aber ist,
daß sie mit geradezu grauenerregender Sicherheit das Wesen und die Tätigkeit
des Judenvolkes aufdecken und in ihren inneren Zusammenhängen sowie den
letzten Schlußzielen darlegen. Die beste Kritik an ihnen jedoch bildet die
Wirklichkeit. Wer die geschichtliche Entwicklung der letzten hundert Jahre
von den Gesichtspunkten dieses Buches aus überprüft, dem wird auch das
Geschrei der jüdischen Presse sofort verständlich werden. Denn wenn dieses
Buch erst einmal Gemeingut eines Volkes geworden sein wird, darf die jüdische
Gefahr auch schon als gebrochen gelten.
Um den Juden kennenzulernen, ist es am besten, seinen Weg zu studieren, den
er innerhalb der anderen Völker und im Laufe der Jahrhunderte genommen hat. Es
genügt dabei, dies nur an einem Beispiele zu verfolgen, um zu den nötigen
Erkenntnissen zu kommen. Da sein Werdegang immer und zu allen Zeiten derselbe
war, wie ja auch die von ihm angefressenen Völker immer die gleichen sind, so
empfiehlt es sich, bei einer solchen Betrachtung seine Entwicklung in bestimmte
Abschnitte zu zerlegen, die ich in diesem Falle der Einfachheit halber mit
Buchstaben bezeichne.
Die ersten Juden sind nach Germanien im Verlaufe des Vordringens der Römer
gekommen, und zwar wie immer als Händler. In den Stürmen der Völkerwanderung
aber sind sie anscheinend wieder verschwunden, und so darf als Beginn einer
neuen und nun bleibenden Verjudung Mittel- und Nordeuropas die Zeit der
ersten germanischen Staatenbildung angesehen werden. Eine Entwicklung setzt
ein, die immer dieselbe oder eine ähnliche war, wenn irgendwo Juden auf
arische Völker stießen.
a) Mit dem Entstehen der ersten festen Siedlungen ist der Jude plötzlich
"da". Er kommt als Händler und legt anfangs noch wenig Wert auf die
Verschleierung seines Volkstums. Er ist noch Jude, zum Teil vielleicht auch
deshalb, weil der äußere Rassenunterschied zwischen ihm und dem Gastvolk zu
groß, seine sprachlichen Kenntnisse noch zu gering, die Abgeschlossenheit des
Gastvolkes jedoch zu scharf sind, als daß er es wagen dürfte, als etwas
anderes denn ein fremder Händler erscheinen zu wollen. Bei seiner
Geschmeidigkeit und der Unerfahrenheit des Gastvolkes bedeutet die
Beibehaltung seines Charakters als Jude auch keinen Nachteil für ihn, sondern
eher einen Vorteil; man kommt dem Fremden freundlich entgegen.
b) Allmählich beginnt er sich langsam in der Wirtschaft zu betätigen, nicht
als Produzent, sondern ausschließlich als Zwischenglied. In seiner
tausendjährigen händlerischen Gewandtheit ist er den noch unbeholfenen,
besonders aber grenzenlos ehrlichen Ariern weit überlegen, so daß schon in
kurzer Zeit der Handel sein Monopol zu werden droht.
Er beginnt mit dem Verleihen von Geld, und zwar wie immer zu Wucherzinsen.
Tatsächlich führt er den Zins auch dadurch ein. Die Gefahr dieser neuen
Einrichtung wird zunächst nicht erkannt, sondern um der augenblicklichen
Vorteile wegen sogar begrüßt.c) Der Jude ist vollkommen seßhaft geworden, d.
h. er besiedelt in den Städten und Flecken besondere Viertel und bildet immer
mehr einen Staat im Staate. Den Handel sowohl als sämtliche Geldgeschäfte
faßt er als sein eigenstes Privileg auf, das er rücksichtslos auswertet.
D) Das Geldgeschäft und der Handel sind restlos sein Monopol geworden. Seine
Wucherzinsen erregen endlich Widerstand, seine zunehmende sonstige Frechheit
aber Empörung, sein Reichtum Neid. Das Maß wird übervoll, als er auch den
Grund und Boden in den Kreis seiner händlerischen Objekte einbezieht und ihn
zur verkäuflichen, besser, handelbaren Ware erniedrigt. Da er selber den
Boden nie bebaut, sondern bloß als ein Ausbeutungsgut betrachtet, auf dem der
Bauer sehr wohl bleiben kann, allein unter den elendsten Erpressungen seitens
seines nunmehrigen Herrn, steigert sich die Abneigung gegen ihn allmählich
zum offenen Haß. Seine blutsaugerische Tyrannei wird so groß. daß es zu
Ausschreitungen gegen ihn kommt. Man beginnt sich den Fremden immer näher
anzusehen und entdeckt immer neue abstoßende Züge und Wesensarten an ihm, bis
die Kluft unüberbrückbar wird.
In Zeiten bitterster Not bricht endlich die Wut gegen ihn aus, und die
ausgeplünderten und zugrunde gerichteten Massen greifen zur Selbsthilfe, um
sich der Gottesgeißel zu erwehren. Sie haben ihn im Laufe einiger
Jahrhunderte kennengelernt und empfinden schon sein bloßes Dasein als gleiche
Not wie die Pest.
E) Nun beginnt der Jude aber seine wahren Eigenschaften zu enthüllen. Mit
widerlicher Schmeichelei macht er sich an die Regierungen heran, läßt sein
Geld arbeiten und sichert sich auf solche Art immer wieder den Freibrief zu
neuer Ausplünderung seiner Opfer. Wenn auch manchmal die Wut des Volkes gegen
den ewigen Blutegel lichterloh
{340 Der Werdegang des Judentums}
aufbrennt, so hindert ihn dies nicht im geringsten, in wenigen Jahren schon
wieder in dem kaum verlassenen Orte neuerdings aufzutauchen und das alte
Leben von vorne zu beginnen. Keine Verfolgung kann ihn von seiner Art der
Menschenausbeutung abbringen, keine ihn vertreiben, nach jeder ist er in
kurzer Zeit wieder da, und zwar als der alte.
Um wenigstens das Allerärgste zu verhindern, beginnt man, den Boden seiner
wucherischen Hand zu entziehen, indem man ihm die Erwerbung desselben einfach
gesetzlich unmöglich macht.
F) In dem Maße, in dem die Macht der Fürsten zu steigen beginnt, drangt er
sich immer näher an diese heran. Er bettelt um "Freibriefe" und
"Privilegien", die er von den stets in Finanznöten befindlichen Herren gegen
entsprechende Bezahlung gerne erhält. Was ihn dieses auch kostet, er bringt
in wenigen Jahren das ausgegebene Geld mit Zins und Zinseszins wieder herein.
Ein wahrer Blutegel, der sich an den Körper des unglücklichen Volkes ansetzt
und nicht wegzubringen ist, bis die Fürsten selber wieder Geld brauchen und
ihm das ausgesogene Blut höchst persönlich abzapfen.
Dieses Spiel wiederholt sich immer von neuem, wobei die Rolle der sogenannten
"deutschen Fürsten" genau so erbärmlich wie die der Juden selber ist. Sie
waren wirklich die Strafe Gottes für ihre lieben Völker, diese Herren, und
finden ihre Parallele nur in verschiedenen Ministern der heutigen Zeit.
Den deutschen Fürsten ist es zu danken, daß die deutsche Nation sich von der
jüdischen Gefahr nicht endgültig zu er. lösen vermochte. Leider hat sich
darin auch später nichts geändert, so daß ihnen vom Juden nur der tausendfach
verdiente Lohn zuteil wurde für die Sünden, die sie an ihren Völkern einst
verbrochen haben. Sie verbündeten sich mit dem Teufel und landeten bei ihm.
G) So führt seine Umgarnung der Fürsten zu deren Verderben. Langsam, aber
sicher lockert sich ihre Stellung zu den Völkern in dem Maße, in dem sie
aufhören, den Interessen derselben zu dienen, und statt dessen zu Nutznießern
ihrer Untertanen werden. Der Jude weiß ihr Ende genau und sucht es nach
Möglichkeit
zu beschleunigen. Er selber fördert ihre ewige Finanznot, indem er sie den
wahren Aufgaben immer mehr entfremdet, in übelster Schmeichelei umkriecht, zu
Lastern anleitet und sich dadurch immer unentbehrlicher macht. Seine
Gewandtheit, besser Skrupellosigkeit in allen Geldangelegenheiten versteht
es, immer neue Mittel aus den ausgeplünderten Untertanen herauszupressen, ja
herauszuschinden, die in immer kürzeren Zeiträumen den Weg alles Irdischen
gehen. So hat jeder Hof seinen "Hofjuden" ? wie die Scheusale heißen, die das
liebe Volk bis zur Verzweiflung quälen und den Fürsten das ewige Vergnügen
bereiten. Wen will es da wundernehmen, daß diese Zierden des menschlichen
Geschlechtes endlich auch äußerlich geziert werden und in den erblichen
Adelsstand emporsteigen, so mithelfen, auch diese Einrichtung nicht nur der
Lächerlichkeit preiszugeben, sondern sogar zu vergiften?Nun vermag er
natürlich erst recht seine Stellung zugunsten seines Fortkommens zu
verwenden.
Endlich braucht er sich ja nur taufen zu lassen, um in den Besitz aller
Möglichkeiten und Rechte der Landeskinder selber kommen zu können. Er besorgt
dieses Geschäft denn auch nicht selten zur Freude der Kirchen aber den
gewonnenen Sohn und Israels aber den gelungenen Schwindel.
H) In der Judenheit beginnt sich jetzt ein Wandel zu vollziehen. Sie waren
bisher Juden, d. h. man legte keinen Wert darauf, als etwas anderes
erscheinen zu wollen, und konnte dies auch nicht bei den so überaus
ausgeprägten Rassenmerkmalen auf beiden Seiten. Noch in der Zeit Friedrichs
des Großen fällt es keinem Menschen ein, in den Juden etwas anderes als das
"fremde" Volk zu sehen, und noch Goethe ist entsetzt bei dem Gedanken, daß
künftig die Ehe zwischen Christen und Juden nicht mehr gesetzlich verboten
sein soll. Goethe aber war denn doch, wahrhaftiger Gott, kein Rückschrittler
oder gar Zelot; was aus ihm sprach, war nichts anderes als die Stimme des
Blutes und der Vernunft. So erblickte ? trotz aller schmachvollen Handlungen
der Höfe ? das Volk im Juden instinktiv den fremden Körper im eigenen Leibe und
stellte sich demgemäß auch zu ihm ein.
Nun aber sollte dies anders werden. Im Laufe von mehr als tausend Jahren hat
er die Sprache des Gastvolkes so weit beherrschen gelernt, daß er es nun
wagen zu können glaubt, sein Judentum künftig etwas weniger zu betonen und
sein "Deutschtum" mehr in den Vordergrund zu stellen; denn so lächerlich, ja
aberwitzig es zunächst auch erscheinen mag, nimmt er sich dennoch die
Freiheit heraus und verwandelt sich in einen "Germanen", in diesem Falle also
in einen "Deutschen". Damit setzt eine der infamsten Täuschungen ein, die
sich denken läßt. Da er vom Deutschtum wirklich nichts besitzt als die Kunst,
seine Sprache noch dazu in fürchterlicher Weise ? zu radebrechen, im übrigen
aber niemals sich mit ihm vermengte, beruht mithin sein ganzes Deutschtum nur
auf der Sprache allein. Die Rasse aber liegt nicht in der Sprache, sondern
ausschließlich im Blute, etwas, das niemand besser weiß als der Jude, der
gerade auf die Erhaltung seiner Sprache nur sehr wenig Wert legt, hingegen
allen Wert auf die Reinhaltung seines Blutes. Ein Mensch kann ohne weiteres
die Sprache ändern, d. h. er kann sieh einer anderen bedienen; allein er wird
dann in seiner neuen Sprache die alten Gedanken ausdrücken; sein inneres
Wesen wird nicht verändert. Dies zeigt am allerbesten der Jude, der in
tausend Sprachen reden kann und dennoch immer der eine Jude bleibt. Seine
Charaktereigenschaften sind dieselben geblieben, mochte er vor zweitausend
Jahren als Getreidehändler in Ostia römisch sprechen oder mag er als
Mehlschieber von heute deutsch mauscheln. Es ist immer der gleiche Jude. Daß
diese Selbstverständlichkeit von einem normalen heutigen Ministerialrat oder
höheren Polizeibeamten nicht begriffen wird, ist freilich auch
selbstverständlich, läuft doch etwas Instinkt- und Geistloseres schwerlich
herum als diese Diener unserer vorbildlichen Staatsautorität der Gegenwart.
Der Grund, warum sich der Jude entschließt, auf einmal zum "Deutschen" zu
werden, liegt auf der Hand. Er fühlt, wie die Macht der Fürsten langsam ins
Wanken gerät, und sucht deshalb frühzeitig eine Plattform unter seine Füße zu
bekommen. Weiter aber ist seine geldliche Beherrschung der gesamten Wirtschaft
schon so fortgeschritten, daß
er ohne den Besitz aller "staatsbürgerlichen" Rechte das ganze ungeheure
Gebäude nicht mehr länger zu stützen vermag, auf alle Fälle keine weitere
Steigerung seines Einflusses mehr stattfinden kann. Beides aber wünscht er;
denn je höher er klimmt, um so lockender steigt aus dem Schleier der
Vergangenheit sein altes, ihm einst verhießenes Ziel heraus, und mit
fiebernder Gier sehen seine hellsten Köpfe den Traum der Weltherrschaft schon
wieder in faßbare Nähe rücken. So ist sein einziges Streben darauf gerichtet,
sich in den Vollbesitz der "staatsbürgerlichen" Rechte zu setzen.
Dies ist der Grund der Emanzipation aus dem Ghetto.
I) So entwickelt sich aus dem Hofjuden langsam der Volksjude, das heißt
natürlich: der Jude bleibt nach wie vor in der Umgebung der hohen Herren, ja,
er sucht sich eher noch mehr in deren Kreis hineinzuschieben, allein zu
gleicher Zeit biedert sich ein anderer Teil seiner Rasse an das liebe Volk
an. Wenn man bedenkt, wie sehr er an der Masse im Laufe der Jahrhunderte
gesündigt hatte, wie er sie immer von neuem unbarmherzig auspreßte und
aussog, wenn man weiter bedenkt, wie ihn das Volk dafür allmählich hassen
lernte und am Ende in seinem Dasein wirklich nur mehr eine Strafe des Himmels
für die anderen Völker erblickte, so kann man verstehen, wie schwer dem Juden
diese Umstellung werden muß. Ja, es ist eine mühsame Arbeit, sich den
abgehäuteten Opfern auf einmal als "Freund der Menschen" vorzustellen.
Er geht denn auch zunächst daran, in den Augen des Volkes wieder gutzumachen,
was er bisher an ihm verbrochen hatte. Er beginnt seine Wandlung als
"Wohltäter" der Menschheit. Da seine neue Güte einen realen Grund hat, kann
er sich auch nicht gut an das alte Bibelwort halten, daß die Linke nicht
wissen solle, was die Rechte gibt, sondern er muß sich wohl oder übel damit
abfinden, möglichst
viele wissen zu lassen, wie sehr er die Leiden der Masse empfindet, und was
alles er dagegen persönlich an Opfern bringt. In dieser ihm nun einmal
angeborenen Bescheidenheit trommelt er seine Verdienste in die übrige Welt so
lange hinaus, bis diese wirklich daran zu glauben beginnt. Wer nicht daran
glaubt, tut ihm bitter Unrecht. In kurzer Zeit schon fängt er an, die Dinge
so zu drehen, als ob bisher überhaupt nur ihm immer Unrecht zugefügt worden
wäre und nicht umgekehrt. Besonders Dumme glauben dies und können dann nicht
anders, als den armen "Unglücklichen" zu bedauern.
Im übrigen wäre hier noch zu bemerken, daß der Jude bei aller
Opferfreudigkeit persönlich natürlich dennoch nie verarmt. Er versteht schon
einzuteilen; ja, manchmal ist seine Wohltat wirklich nur mit dem Dünger zu
vergleichen, der auch nicht aus Liebe zum Feld auf dieses gestreut wird,
sondern aus Voraussicht für das spätere eigene Wohl. Auf jeden Fall aber weiß
in verhältnismäßig kurzer Zeit alles, daß der Jude ein "Wohltäter und
Menschenfreund" geworden ist. Welch ein eigentümlicher Wandel!Was aber bei
anderen mehr oder weniger als selbstverständlich gilt, erweckt schon deshalb
höchstes Erstaunen, ja bei vielen ersichtliche Bewunderung, weil es bei ihm
eben nicht selbstverständlich ist. So kommt es, daß man ihm auch jede solche
Tat noch um vieles höher anrechnet als der übrigen Menschheit.
Aber noch mehr: Der Jude wird auf einmal auch liberal und fängt an, vom
notwendigen Fortschritt der Menschheit zu schwärmen.
Langsam macht er sich so zum Wortführer einer neuen Zeit.
Freilich zerstört er auch immer gründlicher die Grundlagen einer wahrhaft
volkstümlichen Wirtschaft. Über dem Umwege der Aktie schiebt er sich in den
Kreislauf der nationalen Produktion ein, macht diese zum käuflichen, besser
handelbaren Schacherobjekt und raubt damit den Betrieben die Grundlagen einer
persönlichen Besitzerschaft. Damit erst tritt zwischen Arbeitgeber und
Arbeitnehmer jene innere Entfremdung ein, die zur späteren politischen
Klassenspaltung hinüberleitet.
Endlich aber wächst die jüdische Einflußnahme auf wirtschaftliche Belange
aber die Börse nun unheimlich schnell an. Er wird zum Besitzer oder doch zum
Kontrolleur der nationalen Arbeitskraft.
Zur Stärkung seiner politischen Sicherheit versucht er, die rassischen und
staatsbürgerlichen Schranken einzureißen, die ihn zunächst noch auf Schritt
und Tritt beengen. Er kämpft zu diesem Zwecke mit aller ihm eigenen Zähigkeit
für die religiöse Toleranz ? und hat in der ihm vollständig verfallenen
Freimaurerei ein vorzügliches Instrument zur Verfechtung wie aber auch zur
Durchschiebung seiner Ziele. Die Kreise der Regierenden sowie die höheren
Schichten des politischen und wirtschaftlichen Bürgertums gelangen durch
maurerische Fäden in seine Schlingen, ohne das sie es auch nur zu ahnen
brauchen.
Nur das Volk als solches oder besser der Stand, der, im Erwachen begriffen,
sich selber seine Rechte und die Freiheit erkämpft, kann dadurch in tieferen
und breiteren Schichten noch nicht genügend erfaßt werden. Dieses aber ist
nötiger als alles andere; denn der Jude fühlt, daß die Möglichkeit seines
Aufstieges zu einer beherrschenden Rolle nur gegeben ist, wenn sich vor ihm
ein "Schrittmacher" befindet; den aber vermeint er im Bürgertum, und zwar in
den breitesten Schichten desselben, erkennen zu können. Die Handschuhmacher
und Leineweber aber kann man nicht mit dem feinen Netz der Freimaurerei
einfangen, sondern es müssen hier schon gröbere und dabei aber nicht minder
eindringliche Mittel angesetzt werden. So kommt zur Freimaurerei als zweite
Waffe im Dienste des Judentums: die Presse. In ihren Besitz setzt er sich mit
aller Zähigkeit und Geschicklichkeit. Mit ihr beginnt er langsam das ganze
öffentliche Leben zu umklammern und zu umgarnen, zu leiten und zu schieben,
da er in der Lage ist, jene Macht zu erzeugen und zu dirigieren, die man
unter der Bezeichnung "öffentliche Meinung" heute besser kennt als noch vor
wenigen Jahrzehnten.
Dabei stellt er sich persönlich immer als unendlich wissensdurstig hin, lobt
jeden Fortschritt, am meisten freilich den, der zum Verderben der anderen
führt; denn jedes Wissen und jede Entwicklung beurteilt er immer nur nach der
Möglichkeit der Förderung seines Volkstums, und wo diese fehlt, ist er der
unerbittliche Todfeind jedes Lichtes, der Hasser jeder wahren Kultur. So
verwendet er alles Wissen, das er in den Schulen der anderen aufnimmt, nur im
Dienste seiner Rasse.
Dieses Volkstum aber hütet er wie nie zuvor. Während er von "Aufklärung",
"Fortschritt, "Freiheit", "Menschentum" usw. überzufließen scheint, übt er
selber strengste Abschließung seiner Rasse. Wohl hängt er seine Frauen
manchmal einflußreichen Christen an, allein, er erhält seinen männlichen
Stamm grundsätzlich immer rein. Er vergiftet das Blut der andern, wahrt aber
sein eigenes. Der Jude heiratet fast nie eine Christin, sondern der Christ
die Jüdin. Die Bastards [Mischlinge] aber schlagen dennoch nach der jüdischen
Seite aus. Besonders ein Teil des höheren Adels verkommt vollständig. Der
Jude weiß das ganz genau und betreibt deshalb diese Art der "Entwaffnung" der
geistigen Führerschicht seiner rassischen Gegner planmäßig. Zur Maskierung
des Treibens und zur Einschläferung seiner Opfer jedoch redet er immer mehr
von der Gleichheit aller Menschen, ohne Rücksicht auf Rasse und Farbe. Die
Dummen beginnen es ihm zu glauben.
Da jedoch sein ganzes Wesen immer noch zu stark den Geruch des allzu Fremden
an sich haften hat, als daß besonders die breite Masse des Volkes ohne
weiteres in sein Garn gehen würde, läßt er durch seine Presse ein Bild von
sich geben, das der Wirklichkeit so wenig entspricht, wie es umgekehrt seinem
verfolgten Zwecke dient. In Witzblättern besonders bemüht man sich, die Juden
als ein harmloses Völkchen hinzustellen, das nun einmal seine Eigenarten
besitzt ? wie eben andere auch ?, das aber doch, selbst in seinem vielleicht
etwas fremd anmutenden Gebaren, Anzeichen einer möglicherweise komischen,
jedoch immer grundehrlichen und gütigen Seele von sich gebe. Wie man sich
überhaupt bemüht, ihn immer mehr unbedeutend als gefährlich erscheinen zu
lassen.
Sein Endziel in diesem Stadium aber ist der Sieg der Demokratie oder, wie er
es versteht: die Herrschaft des Parlamentarismus. Sie entspricht am meisten
seiten Bedürfnissen; schaltet sie doch die Persönlichkeit aus ? und setzt an
ihre Stelle die Majorität der Dummheit, Unfähigkeit und nicht zum letzten
aber der Feigheit.
Das Endergebnis wird der Sturz der Monarchie sein, der nun früher oder später
eintreten muß.
J) Die ungeheure wirtschaftliche Entwicklung führt zu einer Änderung der
sozialen Schichtung des Volkes. ludet das kleine Handwerk langsam abstirbt
und damit die Möglichkeit der Gewinnung einer selbständigen Existenz für den
Arbeiter immer seltener wird, verproletarisiert dieser zusehends. Es entsteht
der industrielle "Fabrikarbeiter", dessen wesentlichstes Merkmal darin zu
suchen ist, daß er kaum je in die Lage kommt, sich im späteren Leben eine
eigene Existenz gründen zu können. Er ist im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes
besitzlos, seine alten Tage sind eine Qual und kaum mehr mit Leben zu
bezeichnen.
Schon früher wurde einmal eine ähnliche Lage geschaffen, die gebieterisch
einer Lösung zudrängte und sie auch fand. Zum Bauern und Handwerker waren als
weiterer Stand langsam der Beamte und Angestellte ? besonders des Staates ?
gekommen. Auch sie waren Besitzlose im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes. Der Staat
fand aus diesem ungesunden Zustand endlich dadurch einen Ausweg, daß er die
Versorgung des Staatsangestellten, der selbst für seine alten Tage nicht
vorbeugen konnte, übernahm und die Pension, das Ruhegehalt, einführte.
Langsam folgten immer mehr private Betriebe diesem Beispiele, so daß heute
fast jeder geistige Festangestellte seine spätere Pension bezieht, sofern der
Betrieb eine bestimmte Größe schon erreicht oder überschritten hat. Und erst
die Sicherung des Staatsbeamten im Alter vermochte diesen zu jener
selbstlosen Pflichttreue zu erziehen, die in der Vorkriegszeit die vornehmste
Eigenschaft des deutschen Beamtentums war.
So wurde ein ganzer Stand, der eigentumslos blieb, in kluger Weise dem
sozialen Elend entrissen und damit dem Volksganzen eingegliedert.
Nun war diese Lage neuerdings und diesmal in viel größerem Umfange an den
Staat und die Nation heran. getreten. Immer neue, in die Millionen gehende
Menschenmassen siedelten aus den bäuerlichen Orten in die größeren Städte
aber, um als Fabrikarbeiter in den neugegründeten Industrien das tägliche
Brot zu verdienen. Arbeits- und Lebensverhältnisse des neuen Standes waren
schlimmer als traurig. Schon die mehr oder minder mechanische Übertragung der
früheren Arbeitsmethoden des alten Handwerkers oder auch Bauern auf die neue
Form paßte in keinerlei Weise. Die Tätigkeit des einen wie des anderen ließ
sich nicht mehr vergleichen mit den Anstrengungen, die der industrielle
Fabrikarbeiter zu leisten hat. Bei dem alten Handwerk mochte die Zeit
vielleicht weniger eine Rolle spielen, aber bei den neuen Arbeitsmethoden
spielte sie diese um so mehr. Die formale Übernahme der alten Arbeitszeiten
in den industriellen Großbetrieb wirkte geradezu verhängnisvoll; denn die
tatsächliche Arbeitsleistung von einst war infolge des Fehlens der heutigen
intensiven Arbeitsmethoden nur klein. Wenn man also vorher den Vierzehn- oder
Fünfzehnstunden-Arbeitstag noch ertragen konnte, dann vermochte man ihn
sicher nicht mehr zu er. tragen in einer Zeit, da jede Minute auf das
äußerste ausgenützt wird. Wirklich war das Ergebnis dieser sinnlosen
Übertragung alter Arbeitszeiten auf die neue industrielle Tätigkeit nach zwei
Richtungen unglückselig: die Gesundheit wurde vernichtet und der Glaube an
ein höheres Recht zerstört. Endlich kam hierzu noch die jämmerliche
Entlohnung einerseits und die demgemäß ersichtlich um so viel bessere
Stellung des Arbeitgebers andererseits.
Auf dem Lande konnte es eine soziale Frage nicht geben, da Herr und Knecht
die gleiche Arbeit taten und vor allem aus gleicher Schüssel aßen. Aber auch
dies änderte sich.
Die Trennung des Arbeitnehmers vom Arbeitgeber erscheint jetzt auf allen
Gebieten des Lebens vollzogen. Wie weit dabei die innere Verjudung unseres
Volkes schon fortgeschritten ist,
kann man an der geringen Achtung, wenn nicht schon Verachtung ersehen, die
man der Handarbeit an sich zollt. Deutsch ist dies nicht. Erst die
Verwelschung unseres Lebens, die aber in Wahrheit eine Verjudung war,
wandelte die einstige Achtung vor dem Handwerk in eine gewisse Verachtung
jeder körperlichen Arbeit überhaupt.
So entsteht tatsächlich ein neuer, nur sehr wenig geachteter Stand, und es
muß eines Tages die Frage auftauchen, ob die Nation die Kraft besitzen würde,
von sich aus den neuen Stand in die allgemeine Gesellschaft wieder
einzugliedern, oder ob sich der standesmäßige Unterschied zur klassenartigen
Kluft erweitern würde.
Eines aber ist sicher: der neue Stand besaß nicht die schlechtesten Elements
in seinen Reihen, sondern im Gegenteil auf alle Fälle die tatkräftigsten. Die
Überfeinerungen der sogenannten Kultur hatten hier noch nicht ihre
zersetzenden und zerstörenden Wirkungen ausgeübt. Der neue Stand war in
seiner breiten Masse noch nicht von dem Gifte pazifistischer Schwäche
angekränkelt, sondern robust und, wenn nötig, auch brutal.
Während sich das Bürgertum um diese so schwerwiegende Frage überhaupt nicht
kümmert, sondern gleichgültig die Dinge laufen läßt, erfaßt der Jude die
unübersehbare Möglichkeit, die sich hier für die Zukunft bietet, und indem er
auf der einen Seite die kapitalistischen Methoden der Menschenausbeutung bis
zur letzten Konsequenz organisiert, macht er sich an die Opfer seines Geistes
und Waltens selber heran und wird in kurzer Zeit schon der Führer ihres
Kampfes gegen sich selbst. Das heißt freilich, nur bildlich gesprochen,
"gegen sich selbst", denn der große Meister im Lügen versteht es, sich wie
immer als den Reinen erscheinen zu lassen und die Schuld den anderen
aufzubürden. Da er die Frechheit besitzt, die Masse selber zu führen, kommt
diese auch gar nicht auf den Gedanken, daß es sich um den infamsten Betrug
aller Zeiten handeln könnte.
Und doch war es so.
Kaum daß der neue Stand sich aus der allgemeinen wirt-
schaftlichen Umbildung herausentwickelt, sieht auch der Jude schon den neuen
Schrittmacher zu seinem eigenen weiteren Fortkommen klar und deutlich vor
sich. Erst benützte er das Bürgertum als Sturmbock gegen die feudale Welt,
nun den Arbeiter gegen die bürgerliche. Wußte er aber einst im Schatten des
Bürgertums sich die bürgerlichen Rechte zu erschleichen, so hofft er nun, im
Kampfe des Arbeiters ums Dasein, den Weg zur eigenen Herrschaft zu finden.
Von jetzt ab hat der Arbeiter nur mehr die Aufgabe, für die Zukunft des
jüdischen Volkes zu fechten. Unbewußt wird er in den Dienst der Macht
gestellt, die er zu bekämpfen vermeint. Man läßt ihn scheinbar gegen das
Kapital anrennen und kann ihn so am leichtesten gerade für dieses kämpfen
lassen. Man schreit dabei immer gegen das internationale Kapital und meint in
Wahrheit die nationale Wirtschaft. Diese soll demoliert werden, damit auf
ihrem Leichenfeld die internationale Börse triumphieren kann.
Das Vorgehen des Juden dabei ist folgendes:Er macht sich an den Arbeiter
heran, heuchelt Mitleid mit dessen Schicksal oder gar Empörung aber dessen
Los des Elends und der Armut, um auf diesem Wege das Vertrauen zu gewinnen.
Er bemüht sich, alle die einzelnen tatsächlichen oder auch eingebildeten
Hirten seines Lebens zu studieren ? und die Sehnsucht nach Änderung eines
solchen Daseins zu erwecken. Das in jedem arischen Menschen irgendwie
schlummernde Bedürfnis nach sozialer Gerechtigkeit steigert er in unendlich
kluger Weise zum Haß gegen die vom Glück besser Bedachten und gibt dabei dem
Kampfe um die Beseitigung sozialer Schäden ein ganz bestimmtes
weltanschauungsmäßiges Gepräge. Er begründet die marxistische Lehre.
Indem er sie als mit einer ganzen Anzahl von sozial gerechten Forderungen
unzertrennlich verknüpft hinstellt, fördert er ebenso ihre Verbreitung wie
umgekehrt die Abneigung der anständigen Menschheit, Forderungen nachzukommen,
die, in solcher Form und Begleitung vorgebracht, von Anfang an als ungerecht,
ja unmöglich erfüllbar erscheinen.
Denn unter diesem Mantel rein sozialer Gedanken liegen wahrhaft teuflische
Absichten verborgen, ja, sie werden mit frechster Deutlichkeit auch wohl in
voller Öffentlichkeit vorgetragen. Diese Lehre stellt ein unzertrennliches
Gemisch von Vernunft und menschlichem Aberwitz dar, aber immer so, daß nur
der Wahnsinn zur Wirklichkeit zu werden vermag, niemals die Vernunft. Durch
die kategorische Ablehnung der Persönlichkeit und damit der Nation und ihres
rassischen Inhalts zerstört sie die elementaren Grundlagen der gesamten
menschlichen Kultur, die gerade von diesen Faktoren abhängig ist. Dieses ist
der wahre innere Kern der marxistischen Weltanschauung, sofern man diese
Ausgeburt eines verbrecherischen Gehirns als "Weltanschauung" bezeichnen
darf. Mit der Zertrümmerung der Persönlichkeit und der Rasse fällt das
wesentliche Hindernis für die Herrschaft des Minderwertigen dieser aber ist
der Jude.
Gerade im wirtschaftlichen und politischen Wahnwitz liegt der Sinn dieser
Lehre. Denn durch ihn werden alle wahrhaft Intelligenten abgehalten, sich in
ihren Dienst zu stellen, während die minder geistig Tätigen und
wirtschaftlich schlecht Gebildeten mit fliegenden Fahnen ihr zueilen. Die
Intelligenz für die Bewegung aber ? denn auch diese Bewegung braucht zu ihrem
Bestehen Intelligenz ? "opfert" der Jude aus seinen eigenen Reihen.
So entsteht eine reine Handarbeiterbewegung unter jüdischer Führung,
scheinbar darauf ausgehend, die Lage des Arbeiters zu verbessern, in Wahrheit
aber die Versklavung und damit die Vernichtung aller nichtjüdischen Völker
beabsichtigend.
Was die Freimaurerei in den Kreisen der sogenannten Intelligenz an allgemein
pazifistischer Lähmung des nationalen Selbsterhaltungstriebes einleitet, wird
durch die Tätigkeit der großen, heute immer jüdischen Presse der breiteren
Masse, vor allem aber dem Bürgertum, vermittelt. Zu diesen beiden Waffen der
Zersetzung kommt nun als dritte und weitaus furchtbarste die Organisation der
rohen Gewalt. Der Marxismus soll als Angriffs- und Sturm-
kolonne vollenden, was die Zermürbungsarbeit der beiden ersten Waffen
vorbereitend schon zum Zusammenbruch heranreifen ließ.
Es vollzieht sich damit ein wahrhaft meisterhaftes Zusammenspiel, so daß man
sich wirklich nicht zu wundern braucht, wenn demgegenüber gerade diejenigen
Institutionen am meisten versagen, die sich immer so gerne als die Träger der
mehr oder minder sagenhaften staatlichen Autorität vorzustellen belieben. In
unserem hohen und höchsten Beamtentum des Staates hat der Jude zu allen
Zeiten (von wenigen Ausnahmen abgesehen) den willfährigsten Förderer seiner
Zersetzungsarbeit gefunden. Kriechende Unterwürfigkeit nach "Oben" und
arrogante Hochnäsigkeit nach "unten" zeichnen diesen Stand ebensosehr aus wie
"eine oft himmelschreiende Borniertheit, die nur durch die manchmal geradezu
erstaunliche Einbildung übertroffen wird.
Dieses aber sind Eigenschaften, die der Jude bei unseren Behörden braucht und
demgemäß auch liebt.
Der praktische Kampf, der nun einsetzt, verläuft, in großen Strichen
gezeichnet, folgendermaßen:Entsprechend den Schlußzielen des jüdischen
Kampfes, die sich nicht nur in der wirtschaftlichen Eroberung der Welt
erschöpfen, sondern auch deren politische Unterjochung fordern, teilt der
Jude die Organisation seiner marxistischen Weltlehre in zwei Hälften, die,
scheinbar voneinander getrennt, in Wahrheit aber ein untrennbares Ganzes
bilden: in die politische und die gewerkschaftliche Bewegung.
waybackjack
wrote:
> Suppose the media was out to get White people, (as if they are not).
Suppose the media has adopted a new preferred minority group.
Which they have done, in casting Jihadists as freedom fighting heroes
and victims instead of the cowardly slime that they are.
waybackjack
wrote:
>
> The Culture War:
>
> Israel Line - Friday, June 10, 2005
>
> Thousands Participate in Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv.
Ayatollah Khomeini:
A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby.
However he
should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK. If the man
penetrates and
damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence
all her
life. This girl, however does not count as one of his four permanent
wives.
The man will not be eligible to marry the girls sister.
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm,
Gom,
Iran, 1990
Book Title Page/ Cover
Inside Cover of Book
Excerpt: Page [1] | Page [2]
[Mohammad (founder of Islam) The Pedophile]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin
menstruation at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any
father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in
heaven.
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm,
Gom,
Iran, 1990 [Mohammad (founder of Islam) The Pedophile]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A man can have sex with animals such as sheepąs, cows, camels and so
on.
However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should
not
sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the
meat to
the next door village should be fine.
From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm,
Gom,
Iran, 1990
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their
urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no
longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed and as quickly as
possible and burned."
The little green book, Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political,
Phylosophica, Social and Religious with a special introduction by
Clive Irving, ISBN number 0-553-14032-9, page 47
Comments: I am ashamed of being born and raised in Iran, a country
where they built a
Mausoleum over his grave and had the greatest party for his 100th
birthday.
Shame on such people.
Return to Dr. Darabi Foundation Home Page
___________
waybackjack
wrote:
>"The Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov immediately denied that
>his forces were involved in the siege.
Lying comes second nature to Muslims.
Killing children is one of their favorite hobbies.
MUSLIME MACHINE-GUN THEIR OWN CHILDREN WHILE PLAYING SOCCER
Iraqi gunmen mow down 9 children
BAGHDAD, March 26 (UPI) -- Machine gun-toting guerrillas in Baghdad
gunned down a mixed Shiite-Sunni group of children playing soccer in a
park, The Times of London reported.
The incident happened Saturday when two cars carrying four or five men
wearing tracksuits pulled up to the park, witness Selim Amer told a
Times correspondent.
"I started looking and they are shooting the kids," he said. "Eight of
the kids already fell on the ground. The guys kept shooting, they just
wanted to make sure everyone was dead."
Amer said almost immediately the neighborhood became a shooting zone,
with Shiites and Sunnis targeting one another. He said it was two
hours before the shooting subsided and the bodies of nine children
were taken to a morgue.
"Not one of them even dared to get their kids, they were moved more to
get revenge," Amer said.
The Interior Ministry's daily report listed the children as among
nearly 50 people killed Saturday in random attacks around the country,
the report said.
Topaz
>Suppose the media has adopted a new preferred minority group.
>
>Which they have done, in casting Jihadists as freedom fighting heroes
>and victims instead of the cowardly slime that they are.
If the media was casting Muslims as freedom fighting heroes America
would not be invading their countries.
Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons?
Answer: Israel.
Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear
non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?
A: Israel.
Q: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of
other
nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of
United
Nations Security Council resolutions?
A: Israel.
Q: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the
international
borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and
naval
gunfire?
A: Israel.
Q: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins
into
other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes
called
exporting terrorism)?
A: Israel.
Q: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military
officers
admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed?
A: Israel.
Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers
who
have acknowledged executing prisoners of war?
A: Israel.
Q: What country in the Middle East created 762,000 refugees and
refuses to
allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses? A: Israel.
Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to
people
whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated?
A: Israel.
Q: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United
Nations
diplomat assassinated?
A: Israel.
Q: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the
assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister?
A: Israel.
Q: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic
facility
in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship in international waters, killing 33
and
wounding 177 American sailors?
A: Israel.
Q: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard,
to
steal classified documents and then gave some of them to the Soviet
Union?
A: Israel.
Q: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard,
then
voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the
American
president grant Pollard a full pardon?
A: Israel.
Q: What country on Planet Earth has the second most powerful lobby in
the
United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of
Washington
insiders?
A: Israel.
Q: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United
Nations
Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by
U.S.
vetoes?
A: Israel.
Q: What country is the United States threatening to bomb because "U.N.
Security Council resolutions must be obeyed?"
A: Iraq
A Pop Quiz on the Middle East
<http://www.caabu.org/press/articles/pop_quiz.html>
By Charley Reese
The Orlando Sentinel
Topaz
Children?
By Stephen J. Sosebee
July 1991, Page 24
Nothing has deepened the collective despair that is life in
Palestine today more than the killing of children, nor has any one
dimension produced greater anger and fuel for the intifada. Though it
may be so common now that it is hardly noticed in Israel, every
injured or dead child is mourned by the 1.7 million Palestinians
resisting occupation.
"They steal our land, imprison our leaders, and deny us our flag
and peace, but we will forgive them when we have our state, " said the
father of Said, a boy killed in Rafah. "But to keep shooting our
children; this I cannot forgive..."
A week after Said's death, his 19-year-old brother was also
killed by IDF troops in Rafah.
Some places in Palestine seem to have become Israeli free-fire
zones for children. In the Shatti refugee camp in Gaza, for example,
10 of the 19 civilians shot dead by the IDF during the uprising have
been under 16 years of age. Among them were three girls, a 3-year-old,
a 6-year-old and a 1 0-year-old, all shot to death within a
three-month period at the end of 1989.
"Do the Israelis think that by shooting our children they can
make us submit?" asks Ahmed, a Shatti resident. "Is it supposed to cow
us or lessen our resolve? Every new martyr confirms again to all why
we must rid ourselves of this occupation."
While the blood of Palestinian children obviously seems cheap to
the Israeli soldiers spilling it, Palestinian parents are at a loss to
understand how the Israeli public justifies and the American public
ignores the killing of their children.
"When my son was killed the entire camp defied the curfew and
beatings to pay him respect," says the mother of Bassani, a
12-year-old killed by an Israeli Defense Forces sniper while tending
sheep during the curfew last February. "The people know his blood is
for Palestine and they supported us during our pain and loss. There is
no greater sacrifice than to lose your child, and there is nothing
greater to sacrifice for than your freedom and country. Still, it
hurts so."
Whether American correspondents are to blame, or whether the
fault lies with dishonest editors, US newspapers are not informing the
American public concerning the frequency with which Palestinian
children have been killed by Israeli soldiers over the past four
years. From Dec. 12, 1990 to April 1, 199 1, for example, 14
Palestinian children under the age of 16 were shot dead. During the
same period of time in the first year of the intifada, 15 kids were
killed by gunfire. In all, 239 children have been killed by Israeli
forces during the uprising, while more than 55,000 more have been
seriously wounded.
"What is the most disturbing fact about the numbers concerning
injured children is that the soldiers don't seem to care who is in the
sight at the end of their rifles when they pull the trigger," says Dr.
Adnan Marshoud, a physician at Shifa Hospital in Gaza. "To most of
them, we must be animals, not living and breathing human beings. They
don't consider that we love our children, or the pain and anger that
burns us when our children are killed or injured."
According to UNRWA statistics compiled just in the Gaza Strip
from the start of the intifada to the first of March this year, 19,715
children under the age of 15 required medical attention due to IDF
acts of violence. Of these, 2,590 were wounded by live ammunition, not
rubber bullets.
"What do they say in America to justify shooting our children?"
is perhaps the most common question asked of foreigners in Palestine.
Always, I wonder if "they don't know" can really be an acceptable
answer.
Rivaling the absolute evil in any situation in which soldiers
kill unarmed civilians (not to mention children) are the tactics of
hard-line supporters of present Israeli government policies. It defies
logic to claim moral superiority and refuse to talk with the PLO
because it is just a "terrorist organization," while Israeli troops
continue to entrap and shoot children on a rather consistent basis.
Even more sickening is the hypocrisy displayed by all sides of
Israel's political establishment, as if Israel's leaders are not
really responsible for the acts that take place on the ground in
Palestine. How is it Defense Minister Moshe Arens can call the Arabs
"an uncivilized people" who "don't value human life, " when Israeli
troops have killed dozens and maimed hundreds of children just in the
period he has been minister of defense. Is he really such a hypocrite,
or does he truly think the circumstances and manner in which his
troops have shot children indiscriminately go unnoticed?
And who can still believe Yossi Sarid, a left-wing politican
from the "peace camp, " when he writes that the "stray bullets" that
"find" Palestinian children "pierced our hearts as well"? Leaders with
"pierced hearts" would demand that their own children stop the
slaughter in which more than 10,000 Palestinian children have been
shot over a four-year period.
Four years is enough time for both Israelis and Palestinians to
contemplate the directions in which they are heading, and to alter
their course if it involves acts for which they do not wish to be held
responsible.
Zion has decided that land is of greater value than the lives of
those living on it. For its part, the occupied population has pledged
not to submit to foreign domination, whatever the costs and suffering.
Thus, it seems the unequal relationship that has spilled so much
needless blood is to continue to be one based on domination and
hatred. And, unless Israelis come to their senses, or Americans refuse
to further condone their actions, the killing of Palestinian children
will continue unabated.
Stephen J. Sosebee is a free-lance writer who divides his time
between Ohio and occupied Palestine.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>How To Explain American Apathy Over Israeli Killings of Palestinian
>Children?
Actually the American media is always whining about Palestinian
"victims" even the Jew-controlled NPR.
Meanwhile, her's something about Palestinians you won't see on Katie
Couric:
Palestinian group to target non-Muslims By MAGGIE MICHAEL, Associated
Press Writer
CAIRO, Egypt - Palestinian militants who held two Fox News journalists
hostage for nearly two weeks threatened in a statement posted online
Saturday to abduct non-Muslims visiting the Palestinian territories
and kill them unless their demands were met.
The statement, posted in the name of the Holy Jihad Brigades on a Web
site frequently used by militants, said the group would kill any
hostages it takes unless they converted to Islam, paid a ransom or
Muslim prisoners were exchanged for their release.
"Any infidel blood will have no sanctity," the group said in the
statement.
It was not possible to verify the authenticity of the statement, which
was dated August 27 — the day militants released American journalist
Steve Centanni, 60, and New Zealand cameraman Olaf Wiig, 36. They were
seized Aug. 14 in Gaza City.
The militant group had demanded the release of Muslim prisoners held
by the United States in exchange for freeing the journalists.
During their captivity, the journalists were forced at gunpoint to
declare that they had converted to Islam, Centanni told Fox News after
he was released. The group said in its statement that the journalists'
declaration saved their lives.
"Nothing but Islam gave their blood sanctity and prevented their
slaughter," the group said.
It added, "We are not the sort of people who are fooled ... but only
God knows intentions."
Before their release, a video was released in which Wiig delivered an
anti-Western speech, his face expressionless and his tone halting.
Palestinian security officials said the name of the group was a front
for local militants. They said they had tracked down the kidnappers —
whom they would not identify — through third parties, but did not say
whether the journalists' were freed under a deal.
Several Muslim clerics have issued edicts in the past stating that a
visa issued by an Islamic country to a non-Muslim person carries an
implicit guarantee of the holder's safety.
One of the most recent fatwas, issued in August by an Egyptian cleric,
asserted that the guarantee applies to visiting Israelis in spite of
popular anger over Israeli military action in Gaza and Lebanon.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>On Sat, 26 May 2007 13:30:26 GMT, nos...@home.net (waybackjack) wrote:
>
>
>>Suppose the media has adopted a new preferred minority group.
>>
>>Which they have done, in casting Jihadists as freedom fighting heroes
>>and victims instead of the cowardly slime that they are.
>
> If the media was casting Muslims as freedom fighting heroes America
>would not be invading their countries.
Even the hate America left-wing media would not tell such a big lie
>
>Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons?
>Answer: Israel.
And all humans should give thanks.
>Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear
>non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?
>A: Israel.
Which group targets "infidels" in their countries while being allowed
to practice Islam in the West?
Christians in Islamic Countries Targeted
WASHINGTON - The situation of Christians has deteriorated in many
Islamic countries since the terrorist attacks on the U.S. and the
subsequent U.S.-British raids on Afghanistan, according to Paul
Marshall, a senior fellow at the Center for Religious Freedom.
A prominent U.S. imam Monday assailed as un-Islamic the persecution of
Christians in Muslim countries ranging from Indonesia to Nigeria. "The
Koran enjoins Muslims to treat everybody with dignity and compassion,"
said Muzzamil Siddiqi, director of the Islamic Society of Orange
County, Calif., when asked about the murder threats, violence, forced
conversions, incarceration and discrimination some Christians are
being subjected to.
Diane Knippers, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy,
praised Siddiqi's remarks as a wonderful statement. "We need more of
this. We need Muslim groups in the U.S. to raise their voices on
behalf of Christians in predominantly Muslim areas."
Knippers pointed out that "U.S. churches were quick to speak up on
behalf of Moslems in our society. They rightly encouraged all America
to treat them with respect. At the same time the churches should speak
up when Christians in Muslim areas are in jeopardy."
The National Council of Churches' news service also condemned
persecution Monday.
"We consider persecution of any religious group unacceptable. We are
actively engaged in protecting Christians and other religious
minorities in countries around the world in partnership with
indigenous religious groups. To give specific details could jeopardize
both their security and our efforts on their behalf," the service said
in a statement.
In a similar vein, Jerry Powers of the U.S. Conference of Catholic
Bishops stated that his church had been consistently active on behalf
of persecuted Christians abroad.
Marshall, an internationally recognized authority on religious rights,
said Christians were in peril in a long belt of Muslim nations
stretching from the eastern parts of Indonesia all the way to West
Africa.
In some cases this was due to government policies; in others religious
fanatics are menacing Christians, embarrassing national governments,
he added.
In an interview with United Press International, Marshall drew a grim
picture, country by country:
Indonesia: In the eastern islands of this largest Muslim nation in the
world, white-uniformed militiamen of Laskar Jihad are forcibly
converting Christians to Islam. Marshall said this caused considerable
embarrassment to the government, which did not condone such actions.
This campaign has so far cost the lives of 5,000 to 6,000 people, the
British-born scholar related. "There are links between Laskar Jihad
and top terrorist Osama bin Laden," he said.
Bangladesh: Small radical groups supporting Osama bin Laden have
bombed or burned down churches.
Pakistan: Christians depend on the protection of the government as
several Muslim leaders have issued fatwas (religious decrees) to kill
two Pakistani Christians for every Afghan Muslim who dies in the
Anglo-American air raids.
There have also been attacks on Christians along the Afghan border,
Marshall told UPI.
Egypt: The government discriminates against Christianity by financing
the construction of mosques, while denying permits for the
reconstruction of Christian sanctuaries, according to Marshall.
Saudi-Arabia: In the last two months, 15 Christian expatriates have
been jailed for worshiping in private homes, and three have been
tortured, according to the religious rights organization International
Christian Concern.
An information officer at the Saudi embassy in Washington, who
declined to give his name, denied this Tuesday: "As far as we know
this is not true. We are not aware of any in jail at this time," he
said.
No religion other than Islam is allowed in the kingdom, and there is
no church. When asked about this, Abdullah M. Khouj, rector of the
Islamic Center in Washington, replied, "This is a matter to be
negotiated between governments."
Sudan: Some 2 million people, chiefly Christians, have been killed in
a civil war fought by the radical Islamic regime in the north of the
country against non-Arab population in the south, according to several
sources including Marshall and Diane Knippers' Institute on Religion
and Democracy.
For several years now, international religious rights organizations
have reported that Christians are being raped, tortured to death and
crucified.
Somalia: Anybody found out to be a Christian will quickly be beheaded
by Muslim vigilantes, Marshall said.
Nigeria: In 12 states, versions of Shari'a law, the Islamic penal
code, have been imposed - in violation of the constitution of that
African federal republic.
After the imposition of Islamic law, riots ensued killing 5,000 in the
city of Kaduna alone, said Marshall. Other reports put the death toll
at around 1,000.
In other Muslim countries, such as Algeria, Islamic radicals opposed
to the government are killing other Muslims, primarily women and
children although they have also murdered priests, nuns and even a
bishop, Marshall explained.
Others, such as the once-tolerant, formerly republican African nation
of Mauritania are now taking tougher measures against Christians,
Marshall continued. "If you arrive with a Bible, they'll take it off
you. And it's illegal to preach Christianity to the locals."
Becoming a Christian in many Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia,
Iran or Afghanistan can mean that one loses one's job, one's ability
to be educated, one's family, and even one's life, Wendy Norvell of
the Southern Baptist Convention's International Mission Board told
UPI.
Added Robert Reccord, president of the SBC's North American Mission
board, "We look forward to the day when Christians living in Islamic
countries will have the same religious freedoms that Muslims currently
enjoy in the United States and Canada.”
_____________
Topaz
The fact that the Jews manufacture "outrage" through media coverage is
well known. The fact that they do everything in their power to
minimize outrage when the issue is non-White offenses against White
should make you question their motivations. And once you understand
their motivations, you will, like me, start to question their right to
own and
control our media of information and entertainment. You will
understand that they are a separate people, with separate interests
and oftentimes opposing interests to ours, and it is extremely
dangerous to let this separate, foreign people have a near-monopoly on
the information transmitted to our people.
Today, I am going to tell you about another crime against White people
which has received very little attention in the mainstream press.
Although a few reporters have mentioned it, it is, like the Wichita
Massacre , not a subject of nightly or weekly reports; it has never
been the subject of a major film or documentary; and the sitcoms and
jiggle shows are never interrupted to report on it. It's not a major
issue as defined by the Michael Eisners and Sumner Redstones of this
world.
And this crime is committed directly against White people by Jews
themselves. It is the crime of slavery, specifically the sex slavery
of White women captured by Jewish gangs and forced to "serve" in
brothels in Israel and elsewhere. The few articles that do get written
about this sex slavery almost never refer to Jews as the perpetrators.
Instead, the
Politically Correct euphemisms 'Russian gangs' , 'Russian organized
crime' , and 'Russian mafia' are used. There are hardly any real
Russians involved in these White slavery rings or in so-called
'Russian' organized crime at all , as the journalists who write these
articles well know. The journalists also well know that if they
emphasized the
Jewish nature of these traffickers in White Women that they would
quickly find themselves without employment.
The enticement into sex slavery begins with poverty. Russia and her
former Communist satellites in Eastern Europe were bled dry
economically by the Jew-created Communist system for many decades.
When that system collapsed, opportunistic capitalists and former
Communists-suddenly-turned-reformers, many of them Jews, moved in for
the easy pickings and bought privatized industries, took advantage of
naïve Whites unaccustomed to predatory business practices, and looted
large sections of Eastern Europe yet again, leaving the people
impoverished, dirt poor, and precariously close to starving, despite
the fact the Eastern Europeans are among the most highly cultured and
educated White peoples on Earth. To anyone who uses the Internet, it's
notorious that Russians and Ukrainians and Moldovans want to escape
their poverty and leave for the West, young women by the thousands are
advertising themselves for marriage to Western men on dozens of
matchmaker sites. Many breadwinners in those countries earn less than
the equivalent of $30 a month.
So when the well-groomed woman in line at the snowbound railway
station or the two-line classified ad in the local paper promises
thirty or sixty times that for easy "housework" or "waitress" jobs
overseas, it's no wonder that these desperately poor women say "yes"
by the thousands. A large number end up in Israel, where the sex
slavery of White women is especially common, and seldom even noticed
by the authorities who give it their tacit approval, but the Jewish
gangs have worldwide networks and enslaved White women are sold to
Jewish-controlled brothels in
Europe, Turkey, and as far afield as Asia.
Let's listen to the stories of some of these women.
Lara Matveyava had no idea that the kindly stranger who offered her a
way out of poverty was a recruiter for a Jewish White Slave ring. In
her case, she was promised a job doing easy housework in Germany,
watering the plants and feeding family pets. When she arrived in
Hamburg, the gang followed their usual first step for soon-to-slaves
with passports, they took the passport from her "for safekeeping,"
thus making her
technically an illegal alien and outside the normal protection of the
law.
After three days she was told what her real job was: she was to work
as a prostitute at a Hamburg brothel. Even though she determined at
once to return home, she was imprisoned for six months at various
brothels masquerading as bars and nightclubs until she finally
escaped. Back home, she says that most of the other sex slaves she met
there were so afraid of their captors that they had given up trying to
escape. Even today, Lara does not use her real name for fear of
retaliation from the Jewish gangs who "own" her.
She says: "'I'm not scared of anything any more because the worst
thing that could possibly happen to me already has. Very few of the
women I met had willingly become prostitutes. Most were tricked. Most
alarming was the sense that there was no way out. Our passports had
been taken; we didn't know what punishment would face us if we went to
the police. We were illegal immigrants involved in an illegal activity
, we didn't
expect any sympathy. To begin with I refused to do the work, but later
I had to, there was no other way of feeding myself, and by that time
I had seen the beatings other women got when they refused to
co-operate."
The women are told that they have to "work off their debts" before
they can go free, impossibly high figures that are arbitrarily
increased by their captors as "fines" if they refuse to submit to any
sexual degradation demanded, including gang rape. When one Jewish
pimp decides he needs "fresh goods," the women are sold to others,
often
again and again in a single year, with the "debts" they owe the pimps
going up with each transaction. Human rights groups estimate that
500,000 White women have been captured and abused by these Jewish
gangs, and that number is from Russia alone!
[London Observer Sunday November 12, 2000]
Twenty-one-year-old Irina thought she was going to be a dancer when
she got off the boat from Ukraine to Haifa, Israel. Within a few days,
she was driven to a whorehouse where her new Jewish boss burned her
passport before her eyes. "I own you," he said. "You are my property,
and you will work until you earn your way out. Don't try to leave. You
have no papers and you don't speak Hebrew. You will be arrested and
deported. Then we will get you and bring you back." At first, she
refused to be a prostitute, but the beatings and repeated rapes by her
owners eventually broke her spirit.
Irina says "I don't think the man who ruined my life will ever be
fined." Until recently, White slavery wasn't even against the law in
Israel. And it was only under intense international pressure that
Israel finally passed laws restricting it last year, but prosecutions
are very rare and sentences light. The enslavement of White women is
essentially winked at by the authorities there, who, after all, are
steeped in a tradition that only Jews are truly human beings, and
these White sex slaves aren't Jews. And pimps prostituting White women
to all comers, as long as the owners claim the women were not actually
purchased by them, is still legal there.
Marco Buffo, the head of an anti-slavery group in Italy stated "It's
no secret that the highest prices now go for the white women. They are
the novelty item now."
Mikhail Lebed, chief of criminal investigations of the Ukrainian
Interior Ministry states "Gangsters make more from these women in a
week than we have in our law-enforcement budget for the whole year. To
be honest, unless we get some help we are not going to stop it." And
the Jewish media are helping to bring these criminals to justice, and
get the Russians and Ukrainians the help and publicity they need,
right?
Recently Yitzhak Tyler of the Haifa police spilled the beans on some
of the operations in that Israeli port city:
"These men pay $500 to $1,000 for a Ukrainian or Russian woman. Do you
understand what I am telling you? They will buy these women and make a
fortune out of them. Take a small place, with 10 girls. Each has 15 to
20 clients a day. Multiply that by say 200 shekels. So say 30,000
shekels a day comes in to each place. Each girl works 25 days a month.
Minimum. So we are talking about 750,000 shekels a month, or about
$215,000. A man often owns five of these places. That's a million
dollars. No taxes, no real overhead. It's a factory with slave labor.
And we've got them all over Israel."
A million dollars a month for an average Jew pimp in Israel. What do
the women get? Beatings, rapes, forced performance of sex on demand,
and a little food and cigarette money. Bars on the windows. Marching
naked in Jewish slave markets when they're sold again for maybe the
fourth time this year. Gang violence and retaliation on their families
if they escape. Punishment and deportation at best from a complicit
legal system.
The Jewish pimps are so confident of their invulnerability that one of
them, Jacob Golan, owner of three houses of prostitution including Tel
Aviv's "Tropicana," even spoke to the New York Times, stating
"'Israelis love Russian girls. They are blonde and good-looking and
different from us,' he said, chuckling as he drew his hand over his
black hair 'And
they are desperate. They are ready to do anything for money.' Always
filled with half-naked Russian women, the club is open around the
clock. There are 12 cubicles at the Tropicana where 20 women work in
shifts, eight during the daytime, 12 at night. Business is always
booming, and not just with foreign workers. Israeli soldiers, with
rifles on their
shoulders, frequent the place, as do business executives and tourists.
Mr. Golan was asked if most women who work at the club do so
voluntarily. He laughed heartily."
In a supreme piece of bitter irony, the reporter noted that Golan has
posted a "missing" poster for an Israeli woman near the front counter
of his sex club. His concern is so touching, isn't it?
[The New York Times Sunday, January 11, 1998]
The United Nations now admits that the selling of sex slaves is now
organized crime's fastest-growing business. And most of these slaves
are White women. The Sydney Morning Herald states that White women are
"the most lucrative commodity of all", surpassing even the
international drug trade in importance. After all, drugs can be sold
only once and then they are used up. White women can be used and then
brought to the
slave markets again and again for years until they are dead or no
longer attractive.
Mariana's story is typical. Lured by promises of easy work and good
money, she left Russia for Israel:
"The brothel routine was brutal and efficient. She worked seven days a
week, servicing up to 20 customers a day, both Jewish and Arab?
"A man stood guard near the door of her room, furnished sparely with a
bed, a dresser, a shower and a sink. She was isolated from the outside
world, except for a woman who stopped each day to sell food to her and
the other Russian girls. Telephone calls home to assure her parents
that "work" was fine were monitored.
"After about five months, Mariana was allowed to leave the one-story
grey building with a driver to meet clients at a Tel Aviv hotel. Three
days later, a group of men drugged her in a cabana behind the hotel.
"'Do what we say. Don't kick and don't scream. There's no point in
fighting,' she remembers them saying before they gang-raped her.
Desperate, she tried to escape the brothel but was caught."
The Russian government admits that 100,000 women were smuggled out of
the country by these Jewish gangs in one year alone, making the human
rights groups' estimate of 500,000 enslaved Russian women look very
conservative. And that, I emphasize, is only Russia.
Doros Michael of the Immigrant Support Action Group in Cyprus,
explains that White women are the most sought-after sex slaves:
"Russian women are thought to be more educated, more beautiful and
more white than Asian women." [The Sydney Morning Herald, March 8,
2001]
Amnesty International has issued reports harshly criticizing Israel's
toleration of the sex slave "industry." I wonder whether you have
heard about that on Fox News or CBS or CNN? Amnesty International
stated:
"The government of Israel failed to take appropriate steps to prevent,
investigate, try and punish those responsible for the violations of
human rights committed against traded women." They also cited the case
of 27-year-old Valentina, who said: "The conditions were horrible.
Most of the girls suffered from venereal diseases. There was nowhere
to run, there were bars on the windows and guards all the time, day
and night."
Valentina eventually was able to leap from a second-story window,
evade the Israeli police, and escape to tell her tale. But thousands
of other White women and girls are still there.
One young Russian woman, Larissa, says that she managed to escape from
her pimp only to be arrested by the Israeli police, who then sold her
to another pimp who admitted he was a former Israeli police officer.
These White slaves are without hope and without friends: the few Jews
who oppose this slave trade are outside the power structure in Israel
and White people in the West are grazing contentedly in the pasture of
consumerism, uninformed about White slavery because the Jewish-owned
media don't tell them about it.
At a recent human rights conference sponsored by the World Coalition
Against Trafficking in Women, it was estimated that there are more
than 200 sex slave brothels in Tel Aviv alone. It was also stated:
"When they arrive in Israel they go through an 'educational seminar'
that includes rape and sale by auction, after which their passports
are taken from them and they are imprisoned in sealed apartments. They
are forced to work in prostitution in order to repay the 'debt'
incurred in bringing them to Israel."
A few former sex slaves had the courage to speak out:
"I am Ilona. I was sold for $15,000, and a few months later I was sold
once more. They forced me to accept 150 clients a week. Lots of people
knew about me and the other girls. There were taxi drivers and people
from the grocery store who brought alcohol, and also the doctors who
gave us pills against pregnancy, take them all month long, so that we
wouldn't lose any work because of the blood. And the doctors checked
us after we were beaten and gave us painkillers. But the worst thing
happened with the policemen who knew about me. One time I managed to
run away and went to the police. They referred me to a policeman who
knew Russian, and I spoke with him and he listened very intently. An
hour after he listened so intently my boss, the pimp, arrived at the
station and took me home and there he gave me the worst beating, so
that all the girls would see what happens if you run away. After that,
I couldn't work for a few days."
"I am Yanna. At the airport I was picked up by Ilyosha. I had six or
seven clients a day on Ben-Yehuda, and I made him NIS 600-700 a day. I
got food, cigarettes and NIS 20 a day. After two weeks, he sold me to
Peter and Gershon, and I worked for a month at their massage parlor,
10 or 15 clients a day, NIS 150 for half an hour, and for me, NIS 20
a
day, food and cigarettes. After two months, Peter sent me to another
bar. Whenever I wasn't working I was locked in an apartment, and they
brought me whatever I needed. Peter said that I could go after I had
made $40,000 for him. I had between 7 and 10 clients a day at the bar,
and there I had to earn NIS 700. If I had a slow day, I had to work
harder the next day. They also beat me at the massage parlor, the
employees and the manager."
A charity group that tries to help Russian children and women, and
prevent them from being ensnared by these Jewish White slave rings,
Miramed, estimates that 90 per cent. of the women who leave Russia in
the clutches of these Jews are not aware that they are headed for
prostitution. And I add that none are aware that they will be enslaved
behind bars, forced to satisfy the lusts of their Jewish owners on
demand, and be sold as slaves again and again in Jewish slave markets.
The Jewish media have obsessed for decades about Black slavery in
North America, a slavery that was abolished by White people and which
hasn't existed for over 130 years. But how often have you heard of the
enslavement of Whites which is going on right now?
I want all of you who hear my voice today to swear in the holy
sanctuary of your soul that you will never forget what the Jews have
done and are doing to more than 500,000 of our women and girls. And I
want you to promise me that you will never forget the Jewish media
bosses who cry crocodile tears for months when a Black criminal meets
a policeman's nightstick but who turn a blind eye to the sex slavery
of enough White
women to fill Rockford, Illinois three times over. When I say never
forget I mean never trust them again.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
THAILAND'S ELDERLY BUDDHISTS AND TEACHERS MURDERED BY
MUSLIME
Teacher, elderly couple shot dead in Thailand's restive south
March 31, 2007
BANGKOK, Thailand: A retired teacher and an elderly couple were shot
dead Saturday while four other civilians were wounded in a bomb
explosion in Thailand's violent-ravaged south, police said.
Sawai Phrommani, a 62-year-old retired teacher, was killed in a
drive-by shooting as he rode a motorcycle home in Pattani's Mayo
district, said police Lt. Col. Narat Thepchalerm.
In Narathiwat, suspected insurgents posing as customers shot dead a
Buddhist couple _Charin Ngaono, 70 and his 68-year-old wife Rabiep _in
their grocery store in Rangae district, police said.
Four Buddhist civilians also were wounded in Yala province, when a
roadside bomb exploded as their car passed over it, police said.
Thailand's southernmost provinces of Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat have
witnessed an increasingly violent Islamic insurgency that has led to
more than 2,000 deaths in the past three years, most of them
civilians.
The military has largely failed to quell the violence that began in
2004.
In its latest strategy, the government said Friday it will impose
restrictions on motorcycle riders in southern Thailand, who often are
blamed for carrying out drive-by shootings linked to Muslim
insurgency.
Under new restrictions, motorcyclists will be barred from carrying any
male passengers and female passengers will only be allowed if their
faces are not covered by veils. The government has not said when the
new law will come into effect.
Topaz
East issues in the mainstream media. To get published as a news
journalist, it seems you have to follow these rules.
Definitions:
Caught in the Crossfire: When Palestinian civilians are killed.
Retaliation: When Israeli army or settlers kill Palestinians.
Escalation (synonym/can be used interchangeably with Provocation): Any
act of violence or resistance by the Palestinians.
Murdered: When Israeli Civilians are killed
Brutal/cowardly/ghastly: adjectives describing attacks on Israelis see
below for nouns to attach it to).
Self defense: Any act of violence by Israelis.
Terrorism: Any act of violence by the Palestinians.
Terrorist: A person who fights Israeli occupation.
Victims: Any Jewish Israeli.
Attacker: Any Palestinian engaging in any form of resistance (violent
or not).
Also see terrorist.
Targets: Palestinian buildings, homes, offices - What the Israeli
military designates as military targets.
Attack/bombing/murder: Acts the Palestinians commit when directed at
Israelis Measures (e.g. Economic measures, security measures): Any
acts the Israelis commit (blockades, collective punishment, shelling
neighborhoods, starving a population etc).
Clashes: This is a difficult term to decipher but is generally used
when Palestinians die .
Security: Anything the Israeli government chooses to do. This can
include land confiscation, extra-judicial killings, home demolitions,
destruction of groves, uprooting trees, blockades etc. The term
security is reserved for use only with the word Israel or Israeli and
must never be applied to Palestinians.
Under siege: Again a term for use by the Israelis as in Palestinians
have put Israelis under siege. Exact meaning depends on the
circumstances as defined by the Israeli government. Never use for
Palestinian towns or villages.
Civilians: Armed settlers are civilians when killed. Try to avoid
using this term for Palestinians.
Neighborhoods: Areas inhabited by Israeli settlers especially if
targeted by shooting (light guns)
Positions: Any Palestinian towns and villages especially when bombed
by helicopter gunships or raked with large caliber machine guns Rules
When to use Passive voice: if the violent action is committed by
Israelis (e.g. 2 Palestinians were killed, one of them a 9 year old).
Names must be included for any Jewish victims. Try to avoid names for
Muslim or Christian victims but use numbers instead (remember in the
passive voice using non-inflammatory language, e.g. 2 Palestinians
died in clashes).
When an Israeli is killed, it is important to note his or her
profession, where he/she is from and was going, whether or not he/she
is religious, and whether or not he/she is an immigrant from the U.S.
or Russia. If the dead person is survived by a spouse and children,
this should be noted. If the victim is a youngster, the school they
tended should be mentioned, and their friends' feelings should be
noted. in general, people who knew the dead person should testify to
their humanity.
When a Palestinian is killed, they should not be personalized in any
way.
When an Israeli is killed, it is useful to include graphic
descriptions of the death scene - the covered body, the fragments of
flesh, the path of flowing blood, etc.
I hope this is helpful.
Topaz
From: libb...@hotmail.com <mailto:libb...@hotmail.com> (libby)
Date: 9/4/02 6:46 PM Pacific Daylight
Sept.04/2002
It's important for the American people to know that all those
'American' journalists/talking heads that they see and read in the
Zionist controlled print and electronic mass media are not working for
America's interests. The very fact that they appear on CNN or write
for the Washington Post, for example, conveys the impression in the
minds of Americans that these 'journalists' are loyal Americans who
have America's best interests at heart. They are, in fact, leading
players in a huge deception and manipulation of the American people
that when attached to a cause such as, 'support of Israel', or
'attacking Iraq', is unrelenting in it's intensity and scope... Fact
is, they
are part of the same ruling elites of mostly Zionists who by now have
a virtual stranglehold on power in America.
And even as I write this, there on CNN's TALKBACK LIVE is Daniel Pipes
of Middle East Forum, propagandizing in favor of a unilateral military
attack on a sovereign nation, Iraq. An act that if committed by any
country other than America, would be considered a war crime and
justification for America to go to war against the invading country.
The following is an excerpt from the foreword to Aldous Huxley's BRAVE
NEW WORLD.
=============
begin excerpt
=============
The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by
doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is the truth, but
still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.
By simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr.
Churchill calls an 'iron curtain' between the masses and such facts or
arguments as the local political bosses regard as undesirable,
totalitarian propagandists have influenced [public] opinion much more
effectively than they could have done by the most eloquent
denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals.
===========
end excerpt
===========
In plain English, propagandists don't necessarily need to lie to the
mass audience to control them. By not disclosing critical
facts/information, they ensure that no debate will ever take place on
these critical issues. This omitting of critical facts/information is
one of the very tactics used by CNN and the rest of the Zionist mass
media in America. There are many examples of this tactic and one that
comes to mind is the issue of Israel's weapons of mass
destruction(WMD's). The Zionist mass media in America does not discuss
this at all. They do not want public debate on this issue. One of the
reasons being, of course, that America's great 'ally' Israel stole
it's nuclear weapons program from America. Another issue that the
Zionists keep hidden from Americans is the $3,000,000,000 that goes to
Israel each year, payback from the 'Congress of traitors', no doubt,
for Zionist/Jewish election funding.
So Dear Americans: The next time you see/hear/read the 'work' of the
Zionist 'journalists', Kristol, Barnes, Krauthammer, Blitzer, Kagan
Zahn, Gaffney, Schneider, Limbaugh, Pipes, Kaplan, Lipsky, Zuckerman,
Goldberg and all the others, be aware that they and their bosses are
Zionists and their purpose is to serve the interests of
Zionism/Israel, AND NOT AMERICA. Take everything they say with a grain
of salt and a pound of critique.
=== =====
Roy Libby
=== =====
Truth and disclosure are a deceiver's greatest fears.
ZIONIST POWER STRUCTURE
IN AMERICA
Now that we have established the ruthless and criminal nature of
radical Zionism, one more lesson needs to be understood before we
return to the five dancing Israelis of 9-11 and other related stories.
Even the Zionists themselves have never denied that they have long
exerted great influence in America. But what we must understand is
that the Zionists do not merely influence United States policy....they
dominate it! It is this domination that enables them to pull off
monstrous crimes and then conceal them from the general public.
The observation that Zionists dominate the American media, government,
academia, and Hollywood has been made by many prominent Americans and
is easily verifiable by public information.
Henry Ford said this:
"If after having elected their man or group, obedience is not rendered
to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of "scandals" and
"investigations" and "impeachments" for the removal of the
disobedient.
Usually a man with a "past" proves the most obedient instrument, but
even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that
compromise him. It has been commonly known that Jewish manipulation of
American election campaigns have been so skillfully handled, that no
matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient
amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters needed
to discredit him." 33
Charles Lindbergh said this:
"Their greatest danger to this country lies in the Jewish ownership
and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our
government. 34
Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under
Ronald Reagan said this:
"I've never seen a President-I don't care who he is-stand up to them
[the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they
want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. If the American
people understood what a grip those people have got on our government,
they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea
what goes on."
35
While a guest on ABC's Face the Nation, William Fulbright - US Senator
and Chairman of the US Foreign Relations committee - said this before
a national television audience:
"Israel controls the United States Senate. We should be more concerned
about the United States' interests." 36
Nationally syndicated columnist and former presidential candidate
Patrick Buchanan said:
"The United States Congress is Israeli occupied territory." 37
And US religious leader Billy Graham and President Richard Nixon once
had the following exchange, which was caught on tape:
GRAHAM: The Jewish stranglehold on the media has got to be broken or
this country's going down the drain". NIXON: "You believe that?"
GRAHAM: "Yes, sir." NIXON: "Oh boy. So do I. I can't ever say that but
I do believe it" 38
But enough of quoting others. Let's look at the facts of Zionist
control.
FACT: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, UPN, The Washington Post, The New York
Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Daily News, Time
Magazine, Newsweek, People Magazine, US News and World Report and
countless other media and Hollywood companies all have either a
Zionist CEO, a Zionist News Chief, or are owned by a media
conglomerate which has a Zionist CEO. 39 Have you ever noticed how
Hollywood movies always seem to portray Germans and Arabs as a bigoted
fanatics or as terrorists? Now you know why!
FACT: AIPAC, the Israeli lobbying organization, is the most feared
lobby in Washington DC. By their own admission, they are capable of
unseating Congressmen and Senators that do not carry out their
requests. The majority of Congressmen from both political parties
receive large donations from AIPAC. Writing for the Nation Magazine,
journalist Michael Massing explains:
"AIPAC is widely regarded as the most powerful foreign-policy lobby in
Washington. Its 60,000 members shower millions of dollars on hundreds
of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. Newspapers like the
New York Times fear the Jewish lobby organizations as well. "It's very
intimidating," said a correspondent at another large daily. "The
pressure from these groups is relentless." 40 (emphasis added)
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=53>
FACT: The Pentagon is under the control of a hard core Zionist named
Richard Perle. The civilian Defense Policy Board actually wields more
control over the military establishment than the Defense Secretary or
the generals and admirals. There are a number of other Zionists who
serve on the board (Kissinger, Cohen, Schlessinger) as well as
non-jewish members who have always supported Israel and the expansion
of the "War on Terror". The notoriously belligerent Perle, nicknamed
the "The Prince of Darkness", is Chairman of the Board. 41
With Perle as Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Zionist Paul
Wolfowitz as Undersecretary of Defense, and Zionist award winner
Douglass Feith as Undersecretary of Defense Policy, the Zionist
Pentagon gang controls 3 of the top 4 civilian leadership positions of
America's armed forces. Careerist scoundrels like Condoleeza Rice and
Donald Rumsfeld are either under their influence or unwilling to
oppose their drive for WW III. The Perle-Wolfowitz-Feith gang
represent a fanatical and warmongering
"government-within-a-government". In league with these Zionist
Pentagon conspirators are jewish Zionist and potential 2004
Presidential candidate, Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and his
Gentile partner in crime Senator
John McCain (R-AZ).
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=706>
An Israeli journalist named Ari Shavit, lamenting the harsh treatments
that his government dishes out to the Palestinians, made the following
observation in Ha'aretz, a leading Israeli journal:
" We believe with absolute certitude that now, with the White House
and Senate in our hands along with the Pentagon and the New York
Times, the lives [of Arabs] do not count as much as our own. Their
blood does not count as much as our blood. We believe with absolute
certitude that now, when we have AIPAC [the Israel lobby] and [Edgar]
Bronfman and the Anti-Defamation League, , we truly have the right to
tell 400,000 people that in eight hours they must flee from their
homes. And that we have the right to rain bombs on their villages and
towns and populated areas. That we have the right to kill without any
guilt." 42 (emphasis added)
And this only scratches the surface of Zionist power! With such
awesome power to control and cover up events, is it any wonder why so
many of America's journalists and politicians are afraid to even talk
about this issue? Is it any wonder why former President Bill Clinton
would grovel before a jewish audience and say something as ridiculous
as the following statement:
"The Israelis know that if the Iraqi or the Iranian army came across
the Jordan River, I would personally grab a rifle, get in a ditch, and
fight and die." 43
I could go on and on at much greater length about this subject, but I
want to get back to the dancing Israelis. Have I made my point yet?
Subject: THE ZIONIST WHORE
From: "Rasputin" a.se...@worldnet.att.net
<mailto:a.se...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: 9/1/02 8:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:
<edBc9.46977$Ke2.3...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
<mailto:edBc9.46977$Ke2.3...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>>
AMERICA BECOMES THE ZIONIST'S WHORE
We have reviewed how the Zionists used and discarded Germany. Then
they used and discarded Great Britain. After World War II, it was
clear that the chief remaining global power was the United States. Now
the USA had never had any problem with the Arab people, and had no
reason to quarrel with the Arabs.
For the Zionists to maintain and expand the support they were
receiving from America, it would benefit them greatly if the Arabs and
the mighty US could somehow become enemies. Could the Zionists
possibly stoop so low? Why not? Look at what they had already pulled
off! Remember that the official motto
of the Mossad (Israeli's intelligence organization) is "by way of
deception thou shalt do war." 26
In 1955, one of these "false flag" operations was publicly exposed for
the world to see. Israeli agents, impersonating Arab terrorists, were
caught staging a series of bombings against American installations in
Egypt. 27 When this conspiracy was exposed, it ultimately created such
a controversy that it brought down the Israeli government. The long
since forgotten scandal became known as "the Lavon Affair".
Then again during a 1967 war with the Arabs, Israeli gunboats and
fighter jets deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, an unarmed US
communications ship. 28 Thirty five American sailors were murdered and
170 others injured in a prolonged Israeli onslaught - carried out in
broad daylight and with the U.S. flag flying prominently. The intent
was to kill all of the Americans and then leave the Egyptians to take
the blame. Israel denied that the attack was deliberate but the
chilling stories of the lucky American survivors clearly contradicts
that lie. To this very day, the U.S. Congress has never investigated
the USS Liberty massacre.
In 1989, the Israelis once again succeeded in framing enemy Arabs in
order to enrage America. Former Mossad case officer Victor Ostrosvky
became so disgusted with the criminal behavior of his own government
that he defected from the Mossad and tried to warn America of just how
evil and dangerous
they were. Ostrosvky revealed exactly how the Israelis framed Libya
for the bombing of a German night club which killed American
servicemen. 29 It was this frame up job that caused President Reagan
to bomb Libya, killing the 4 year old daughter of Libyan leader Muamar
Qadaffi. France refused to allow
US bombers to fly over their air space and bomb Libya because French
intelligence knew that Libya was unjustly framed by the Israelis.
Among some of Ostrovosky's other amazing revelations are: that the
Mossad often uses Arab agents to carry out missions, that Israeli
agents are skilled at impersonating Arabs, that Mossad had a plan to
turn American public opinion against Iraq, and that wealthy Zionists
in America are often called upon to help carry out Mossad missions.
Ostrovsky, whose tell all book, By Way of
Deception, infuriated the Mossad and made him the target of numerous
death threats. 30
In 2001, the Washington Times ran a story about a 68 page research
paper issued by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS).
The research was compiled by 60 US Army officers as an attempt to
predict the possible outcomes of deploying a US force to maintain
peace between the Israel and
Palestinians. Here's what SAMS had to say about the Israeli military
machine:
"a 500 pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in
both Gaza and the West Bank. Known to disregard international law to
accomplish mission" 31
Of Israel's Mossad, the officers issued this warning:
"Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces
and make it look like a Palestinian Arab act." 32 (emphasis added)
Why does the US, which is trillions of dollars in debt, gives away
billons of taxpayer dollars to a foreign government whose military
violates international laws and whose Mossad is capable of murdering
US troops in order to frame Arabs? Have we lost our minds?
Subject: Bush Must Say 'No' To Israeli Nuclear Blackmail
From: xdange...@aol.com <mailto:xdange...@aol.com>
(XDangerousDNA)
Date: 9/20/02 4:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <20020920193931...@mb-mc.aol.com
<mailto:20020920193931...@mb-mc.aol.com>>
LaRouche Says: Bush Must Say 'No' To Israeli Nuclear Blackmail
Statement by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. September 18, 2002
Sept. 18 - I am warning President George W. Bush and European leaders:
If weapons inspectors return to Iraq and an otherwise-certain
Iraq-centered new Middle East war by the U.S. is thus averted, the
governments of the United States and Western Europe must be prepared
to forcefully intervene, to prevent an increasingly more desperate and
psychotic Ariel Sharon's nuclear-armed regime in Israel, the world's
third-ranking strategic nuclear-weapons power, from blowing up the
entire Middle East region, and beyond, with those weapons!
Therefore, I issued the following statement on behalf of my 2004
candidacy for the Democratic Presidential nomination.
At an international web cast, before a live audience in Washington on
Sept. 11, 2002, I identified three hurdles that had to be overcome to
avert an Iraq war that would trigger a perpetual "Clash of
Civilizations" religious conflict and a New Dark Age: First, the
United Nations Security Council had to become the venue for dealing
with the Iraq situation, and a reasonable resolution had to be
drafted, that would be agreed to by President Bush, overriding the
Sharon-influenced "war party" within his own Administration's senior
ranks. Second, the resolution had to be accepted by Iraq's Saddam
Hussein, as well as by President Bush. With those two conditions met,
LaRouche warned, the gravest, remaining danger to overcome would be a
berserker move by Sharon in Israel to sabotage the peaceful resolution
and blow up the region.
It was the threat of an Israeli nuclear attack on Iraq in 1991 that
blackmailed the first Bush Administration into launching Operation
Desert Storm. Today's Israel, under the insane Sharon regime, is the
only nation on Earth that genuinely fits the profile of a "rogue
state" armed to the teeth with "weapons of mass destruction." Israel
has the third largest nuclear weapons arsenal on Earth, and a triad of
submarine, missile, and bomber delivery systems, capable of
obliterating the entire Persian Gulf. Israeli scientists have recently
threatened that they now have the capability of launching an
intercontinental ballistic missile, meaning that no place on
Earth-including the United States-is exempt from an Israeli
preemptive nuclear attack. LaRouche asks you: Do you dare dismiss this
threat from Sharon?...
Since the 1956 attack on Egypt by Britain, France, and Israel, until
the 1989-1991 break-up of Soviet power, Israel's access to nuclear
weapons had made it the third "tilt" power in the global strategic
equation.
Already in 1956, it took an experienced military man, President Dwight
Eisenhower, to force Israel to back down from the Suez invasion, after
both Britain and France had withdrawn under American pressure.
Eisenhower not only threatened to cut off all U.S. military and
civilian aid to Israel; he also threatened to remove the tax-exempt
status of all American organizations that provided aid to Israel. An
even more resolute action will now be required from a far-less
qualified President George W. Bush, to stop Sharon from carrying out
either a false-flag "Islamist" terrorist attack against an American
target, or a nuclear attack on Iraq or Iran. This is deadly serious
stuff, and your personal involvement in the effort to stop it is
vital.
Are you prepared to have the Sharon regime in Israel once again
blackmail an American President into starting a war in the Persian
Gulf, out of fear of an Israeli weapons of mass destruction attack on
Baghdad? Do you have any idea what the consequences will be for the
U.S. and world economy, if a new Persian Gulf War, costing American
taxpayers between $2-3 trillion, is launched today, under the current
conditions of a collapsing U.S. economy and a thoroughly bankrupt
world financial system?
I warned that the toleration for the swamp of Sharon agents inside the
Bush Administration, is another grave impediment to the President
taking the urgently required action, in concert with our European
allies and Russia, to stop Sharon from provoking this perpetual war.
In a recent mass-circulation LaRouche in 2004 release, "The Pollard
Affair Never Ended," I named the names of the leading Sharonists
inside the Bush Pentagon and State Department-Paul Wolfowitz, Richard
Perle, Doug Feith, David Wurmser-some of whom literally prepared the
foreign policy doctrine of perpetual war for then-Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in July 1996. These Netanyahu-Sharon Likud
moles inside the Bush foreign policy and national security
establishment are still suspected, now with more and more evidence of
involvement with the convicted Israeli spy, the American-born Jonathan
Pollard.
Since the release and circulation of a million copies of the "Pollard
Affair Never Ended" campaign document, new, even more damning evidence
has surfaced. Therefore, I must intensify my demand for a thorough
national security investigation into key staffers in the Office of
Vice President Dick Cheney, beginning with his chief of staff and
national security advisor, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
Libby, a protégé of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz for the
past 30 years, has assembled a "shadow national security council" in
the Vice President's Office, which has protected the Israeli agents
nest inside the Pentagon and State Department-and blocked an urgently
needed purge of these Likudniks. Libby has his own longstanding deep
ties to the Sharon circles, including to the Pollard spy ring.
While out of government, Libby served between 1985-2000 as the
personal attorney for fugitive swindler Marc Rich. Rich was indicted
by the U.S. Justice Department in 1983 for tax evasion and for trading
with the enemy, and he fled the United States, establishing a
luxurious hide-away in Zug, Switzerland.
Today, according to Israeli sources, Rich is under investigation, for
illegal contributions to Ariel Sharon's last political campaign. He
has been involved in Russian Mafia operations in Africa, and, through
his Marc Rich Foundation in Israel, has openly financed international
operations of the Israeli Mossad. Libby's law partner and mentor,
Leonard Garment, was a pivotal player in the Israeli government's
damage control effort, following the Pollard arrest in November 1985,
and he served as the attorney for Israeli Air Force Col. Aviem Sella,
the man who recruited and deployed Jonathan Pollard.
Now, Ariel Sharon's regime is Hell-bent on provoking a regional war in
the Middle East, a war pivoted on an Israeli pre-emptive attack on
Iraq. The threat is that, if President Bush does not virtually
exterminate Iraq, and neighboring countries, too, Israel will. This
means the likely use of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. All
the while, Sharon's Washington moles are operating under the shadows
of the Vice President and the Secretary of Defense of the United
States. If Sharon is to be stopped from launching World War III in the
Middle East, this entire Pollard stay-behind apparatus must be
thoroughly investigated, exposed, and removed from government-now! It
is time for these Israeli agents and spies to be kicked out of
government, and the Israeli government to desist from its nuclear
blackmail. I demand it. I can not believe that any sane and patriotic
American would not back me up "100%" on this specific issue.
Support me actively on this issue. If you are serious about the
security of our nation and its people, I should be able to count on
you.
<http://www.larouchein2004.net/pages/pressreleases/2002/020918isrblackmail>_
prt.htm
the following is the Israeli black propaganda article:
<http://www.mediamonitors.net/gillespie1.html>
Israel is the third largest arms dealer in the world. They have
violated hundreds of UN resolutions and they constitute a threat to
the entire Middle East, having occupied three countries, Syria
(www.ussliberty.org <http://www.ussliberty.org>) Lebanon, and
Palestine.
So, why not bomb Israel?
<http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=334318>
ISN'T IT INTERESTING HOW THE ABOVE ARTICLE BY FISK IS THE ONLY
PRESS/MEDIA THAT I HAVE SEEN SO FAR THAT MENTIONED THAT RITTER WAS
MAKING REGULAR TRIPS TO ISRAEL TO BRIEF THE ISRAELIS AS TO WHAT HE WAS
DOING WITH THE UNSCOM WEAPONS INSPECTIONS TEAMS IN IRAQ WHEN THEY WERE
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF RICHARD BUTLER. NO WONDER IRAQ WANTED THEM OUT
BACK IN 1998 AS I CAN EASILY UNDERSTAND SUCH (ESPECIALLY AFTER ISRAEL
HAD VIOLATED IRAQI SOVEREIGNTY WITH THE EARLIER BOMBING OF THE NUCLEAR
REACTOR).
I HOPE SUCH SPYING DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN IF PEACE IS GIVEN A CHANCE BY
aLLOWING WEAPONS INSPECTORS BACK INTO IRAQ... HOWEVER, I THINK THE
ONLY WAY TO PREVENT A US ZIONIST-DRIVEN INVASION WOULD BE TO FLOOD
BAHGDAD WITH US AND EUROPEAN PEACE ACTIVISTS... IRAQ COULD PUT THEM UP
FOR A YEAR TO LEARN ARABIC OR SIMILAR.
OUR BIASED PRO-ISRAEL MEDIA ONLY SOMETIMES MENTIONS SPYING BUT NOT
THAT IT WAS ISRAELI SPYING VIA UNSCOM... THE BRITISH PRESS/MEDIA
PROVIDES MUCH BETTER
COVERAGE...
Subject: ISRAEL SHOULD HAVE UN WEAPONS INSPECTIONS AS WELL MANY
AMERICANS ARE WAKING UP TO ISRAELI TREACHERY LIKE WITH THE USS LIBERTY
ATTACK IN WHICH ISRAEL MURDERED 34 SAILORS AND WOUNDED 171 MORE JUST
TO STEAL EVEN MORE LAND IN THE GOLAN IN SYRIA:
israel should be made to accept UN weapons inspections as well FOR ITS
NUKES AND CHEMICAL/BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS:..
Not In Our Name... <http://www.nion.us/> Petition against a war with
Iraq.
<http://www.itsforums.co.uk/zone0/viewforum.php?f=10>
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=668>
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=643>
<http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=706>
Way Back Jack
wrote:
MUSLIME SAY THAT ISLAM IS THE *ONLY* RELIGION THAT CAN EXIST
Gaddafi says only Islam a universal religion By Salah Sarrar
Fri Mar 30, 5:24 PM ET
AGADEZ, Niger (Reuters) - Libyan leader
Muammar Gaddafi said on Friday that it was a mistake to believe that
Christianity was a universal faith alongside Islam.
"There are serious mistakes -- among them the one saying that Jesus
came as a messenger for other people other than the sons of
Israel," he told a mass prayer meeting in Niger.
"Christianity is not a faith for people in Africa, Asia, Europe and
the Americas. Other people who are not sons of Israel have nothing to
do with that religion," he said at the prayer meeting, held to mark
the birth of the prophet Mohammed.
Gaddafi, who is seeking to expand his influence in Africa, said his
arguments came from the Koran. He led similar prayers last year in
Mali.
"It is a mistake that another religion exists alongside Islam. There
is only one religion which is Islam after Mohammed," he said in the
sermon, which was broadcast live on Libyan state television.
"All those believers who do not follow Islam are losers," he added.
"We are here to correct the mistakes in the light of the teachings of
the Koran."
Gaddafi also said it was a mistake to believe that Jesus had been
crucified and killed. "It is not correct to say that. Another man
resembling Jesus was crucified in his place."
Libya grants financial aid to Islamic communities in Africa and
elsewhere to build mosques, Islamic schools and facilities.
Libyan state television often shows Gaddafi meeting groups of African
men or women telling him they converted to Islam.
The mass prayers, chaired by Gaddafi, came a day after Arab leaders
wrapped up a summit in Saudi Arabia. Libya was the only Arab state to
shun the gathering.
"Libya has turned its back on the Arabs ... Libya is an African
nation. As for Arabs, may God keep them happy and far away," Gaddafi
has said to explain his boycott of the summit.
____________
Way Back Jack
wrote:
ITALIAN IMAM CALLS FOR DEATH TO ALL CHRISTIANS
ITALY: PROSECUTORS TO PROBE IMAM'S ALLEGED 'DEATH TO CHRISTIANS' CALL
Rome, 3 April (AKI) - Prosecutors in the northern Italian city of
Turin were scheduled to start investigating on Tuesday footage of an
imam at the local Cottolengo mosque, Mohammed Kohalia, calling on
Muslims to hate Christians and Jews and praying for their death. "The
Prophet has said that the extremists [Jews and Christians] will be
destroyed," the cleric is heard as saying in footage secretly filmed
by a journalist. "Allah should kill the polytheists." Kohalia has
denied making those statements.
The DVD portraying Kohaila's sermon was filmed with a hidden camera by
a faithful attending the prayers on behalf of a news programme on
state broadcaster RAI's second channel, Annozero. Only part of the
footage was broadcast last Thursday while the remaining 40 minutes
containing the harshest threats against Christians and Jews could
reportedly be shown later this week.
The footage also allegedly shows magazines calling for jihad, or holy
war.
In the video, Kohaila says that "no compromise can be reached with
atheists, they must be killed, full stop."
He also talks about women saying that "men are superior: a 500 [small
FIAT car] cannot compete with a Ferrari" and tells the gathering that
men should beat women who disobey.
Kohaila's predecessor, Bouriqi Boutcha of Morocco, was expelled from
Italy in 2004 on suspicion he was linked to Islamic militants.
Manners
living in trailer parks like you.
Why don't you assholes become like white people?
Jasper Towing-Dragging Co, LLCC
"Manners" <man...@manners.man> wrote in message
news:MPG.20c4c7f4d...@nntp.aioe.org...
NapalmHeart
"Bo Raxo" <crimene...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179296717.5...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On May 15, 6:01 pm, retired10ye...@home.net (Way Back Jack) wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 May 2007 19:05:57 -0500, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Let's Talk about Jews and Elections
>>
>> I prefer to talk about Muslims killing Christians, Jews, Hindus,
>> Buddhists .... Russian schoolkids, Scottish airplane traverlers,
>> Spanish and British commuters, Asian nightclubbers .... their own
>> daughters, wives, and mothers.
>>
>> And yet ... and yet .... and yet.... these Muslims will lie with a
>> straight face and declare that it's all about Israel and Palestine.
>
> Yeah, it's not like we kept 25 million Iraqis under the thumb of
> severe sanctions for years, causing the estimated deaths of hundreds
> of thousands due to lack of medical supplies. Or invaded, leading to
> a civil war that has killed tens of thousands more. Or imposed a
> dictator on the Persians and traned up his secret police, who tortured
> and terroized the country, until the Iranians managed to overthrow his
> son decades later. Or shot down an Iranian civilian airliner for no
> good reason. Nah, all of the blood is entirely on Muslim hands, these
> good Christian nations have never killed anyone in the Middle East.
> Not like Bush has ever even used the term "crusade", eh?
>
>
> Bo Raxo
>
>
>
In the clash of cultures, there's no doubt which side I prefer to see
dominate.
Manners
> In the clash of cultures, there's no doubt which side I prefer to see
> dominate.
>
>
God is on your side.
Bush says so.