Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Paula Jones' past

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael M. Bates

unread,
Mar 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/20/98
to

Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual history.
This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered brow
satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.
Mike
http://members.aol.com/mikeb704


NoSpam

unread,
Mar 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/20/98
to

I admire the President's refusal to stoop to the level that his
adversaries have, even if it may be a disadvantage to his legal defense.

Not a Republican

unread,
Mar 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/20/98
to

NoSpam wrote in message <6eu99j$1...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>...

Clinton has shown no reservations in the past, except where he either had
nothing to begin with, or there was a distinct advantage to reticence.


--
Not a Republican, but a card-carrying member of the VAAAAAST Right-Wing
Conspiracy (VRWC), meeting every Monday and Wednesday in Redskins Stadium
(the only place big enough, after all, it's VAAAAAAAST).


Nicholas Manousos

unread,
Mar 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/20/98
to

NoSpam wrote:
>
> Michael M. Bates wrote:
> >
> > Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual history.
> > This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered brow
> > satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.
> > Mike
> > http://members.aol.com/mikeb704
>
> I admire the President's refusal to stoop to the level that his
> adversaries have, even if it may be a disadvantage to his legal defense.

Yea, he's just an old fashioned southern gentleman who would never
destroy the reputation of one of his confidantes...If only.. more men
were gentlemen like him...

Michael M. Bates

unread,
Mar 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/20/98
to

No, BillyBob would never stoop. That's what White House interns are for.
Mike
http://members.aol.com/mikeb704


Nicholas Manousos wrote in message <3512A3...@gis.net>...


>NoSpam wrote:
>>
>> Michael M. Bates wrote:
>> >
>> > Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual history.
>> > This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered
brow
>> > satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.

WESTCOAST ENTERPRISE

unread,
Mar 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/20/98
to

Was she really a high class prostitute?

(Roger)

Donald Linsenbach

unread,
Mar 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/21/98
to


NoSpam <nos...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in article
<6eu99j$1...@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net>...


> Michael M. Bates wrote:
> >
> > Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual history.
> > This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered
brow
> > satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.

> > Mike
> > http://members.aol.com/mikeb704


>
> I admire the President's refusal to stoop to the level that his
> adversaries have, even if it may be a disadvantage to his legal defense.
>


He doesn't have to stoop....the gutter is pretty low already.

Thomas Cooper

unread,
Mar 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/21/98
to


Nicholas Manousos wrote:

> NoSpam wrote:
> >
> > Michael M. Bates wrote:
> > >
> > > Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual history.
> > > This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered brow
> > > satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.
> > > Mike
> > > http://members.aol.com/mikeb704
> >
> > I admire the President's refusal to stoop to the level that his
> > adversaries have, even if it may be a disadvantage to his legal defense.
>

> Yea, he's just an old fashioned southern gentleman who would never
> destroy the reputation of one of his confidantes...If only.. more men
> were gentlemen like him...

If only the astro-turf could talk.

Thomas

Ford

unread,
Mar 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/21/98
to

On Fri, 20 Mar 1998 09:06:22 -0600, "Michael M. Bates"
<mike...@ibm.net> wrote:

<Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual
history.
<This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered
brow
<satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.
<Mike
<http://members.aol.com/mikeb704
<
<

And a very shrewd move on the part of Bennett. Although they might
dig up plenty of dirt on dear Paula prior to her alleged incident with
Clinton, they can only use as evidence anything that might have
occurred after the alleged event. At the time, she was dating the man
she later married and had 2 children by and chances are very little
would be found..

Bennett now steps up a claims they will take the high road and not
delve into Paula's sexual history.

In doing so, he implies there is a history they could use if they had
chosen to do so. He has his cake, and eats it too.

F. Prefect
--
There is a theory which states that if anyone discovers exactly what the
Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be
replaced with something even more bizarrely inexplicable.

There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

D. Adams


Jim Ward

unread,
Mar 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/25/98
to

Ford wrote in message <3516d666...@news.internet-max.com>...


>On Fri, 20 Mar 1998 09:06:22 -0600, "Michael M. Bates"
><mike...@ibm.net> wrote:
>
><Now Bob Bennett ISN'T going to dish the dirt on Paula's sexual
>history.
><This should keep Patricia Ireland and the other babes of the fevered
>brow
><satisfied. For at least one news cycle, anyway.
><Mike
><http://members.aol.com/mikeb704
><
><
>And a very shrewd move on the part of Bennett. Although they might
>dig up plenty of dirt on dear Paula prior to her alleged incident with
>Clinton, they can only use as evidence anything that might have
>occurred after the alleged event. At the time, she was dating the man
>she later married and had 2 children by and chances are very little
>would be found..


But her happy little home life with two children blows a big hole in her
alleged "aversion to sex" problem that she claims to have developed since
the President allegedly exposed himself to her.


>
>Bennett now steps up a claims they will take the high road and not
>delve into Paula's sexual history.


But you can bet that if an opportunity presents itself during the trial that
Bennet will blast away with both barrels. What is fair for the President is
fair for the accuser.

M Soja

unread,
Mar 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/26/98
to

On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 10:08:40 -0600, -<[ Jim Ward ]>- posted:

>But [Paula Jones] happy little home life with two children blows a big hole in her


>alleged "aversion to sex" problem that she claims to have developed since
>the President allegedly exposed himself to her.

It figures you wouldn't understand that "aversion to sex" since you've
been hanging around with that boner for Clinton.


//////////////////////
"Kiss it."
- Bill Clinton

0 new messages