Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: So who is going to be the FNVW?
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
J. P. Gilliver (John)
Dec 30, 2012, 5:45:11 PM12/30/12
to
In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun, 30
Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>
>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> not the black eyed one's
>
>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>
>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>
Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say
- whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
If you are afraid of being lonely, don't try to be right. - Jules Renard,
writer (1864-1910)
Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>
>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> not the black eyed one's
>
>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>
>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>
Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say
- whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
If you are afraid of being lonely, don't try to be right. - Jules Renard,
writer (1864-1910)
Message has been deleted
Mack A. Damia
Dec 30, 2012, 6:07:57 PM12/30/12
to
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:57:34 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
wrote:
>J. P. Gilliver (John) <ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>
>Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
--
wrote:
>J. P. Gilliver (John) <ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>
>watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
--
Mack A. Damia
Dec 30, 2012, 6:11:41 PM12/30/12
to
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:57:34 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
wrote:
>J. P. Gilliver (John) <ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
wrote:
>J. P. Gilliver (John) <ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>
>
>Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
Ah, very clever.
>watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
Apostro-fans.
Missed it the first time.
--
Molly Mockford
Dec 30, 2012, 6:23:09 PM12/30/12
to
At 22:45:11 on Sun, 30 Dec 2012, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
<ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in
<H6axztd3...@soft255.demon.co.uk>:
>In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun,
>30 Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>>
>>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> not the black eyed one's
>>
>>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>>
>>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>>
>Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
>above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
>things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say
>- whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
>add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour. Then
you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but to the
black eyed one.
--
Molly Mockford
Nature loves variety. Unfortunately, society hates it. (Milton Diamond Ph.D.)
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
<ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in
<H6axztd3...@soft255.demon.co.uk>:
>In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun,
>30 Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>>
>>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> not the black eyed one's
>>
>>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>>
>>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>>
>Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
>above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
>things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say
>- whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
>add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour. Then
you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but to the
black eyed one.
--
Molly Mockford
Nature loves variety. Unfortunately, society hates it. (Milton Diamond Ph.D.)
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
J. P. Gilliver (John)
Dec 30, 2012, 6:34:36 PM12/30/12
to
In article <L8iuVVFd...@molly.mockford>, on Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Molly
Mockford <nospam...@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote
that easier (and thus quicker) to read.
House (TV character), quoted in Radio Times 1-7/3/2008
Mockford <nospam...@mollymockford.me.uk> wrote
>At 22:45:11 on Sun, 30 Dec 2012, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
><ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in
><H6axztd3...@soft255.demon.co.uk>:
>
>>In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun,
>>30 Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>>>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>>>
>>>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> not the black eyed one's
>>>
>>>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>>>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>>>
>>>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>>>
>>Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
>>above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
>>things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd
>>say - whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen
>>would add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
>
>You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
>with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour. Then
>you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but to the
>black eyed one.
Not need, no, but I still think green-nosed and black-eyed would make
><ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in
><H6axztd3...@soft255.demon.co.uk>:
>
>>In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun,
>>30 Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>>>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>>>
>>>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> not the black eyed one's
>>>
>>>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>>>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>>>
>>>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>>>
>>Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
>>above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
>>things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd
>>say - whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen
>>would add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
>
>You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
>with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour. Then
>you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but to the
>black eyed one.
that easier (and thus quicker) to read.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to stop thinking. - Dr. Gregory
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
House (TV character), quoted in Radio Times 1-7/3/2008
Robin Bignall
Dec 30, 2012, 7:09:05 PM12/30/12
to
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:45:11 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
<ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun, 30
>Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>>
>>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> not the black eyed one's
>>
>>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>>
>>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>>
>Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
>above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
>things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say
>- whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
>add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
>
>MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
We're here, lurking quietly, dodging the slings, arrows and apostrophes
<ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <1kvxrdq.pv2f4xmeh65bN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, on Sun, 30
>Dec 2012, Sn!pe <sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote
>>[crossposted: auk; apihna]
>>
>>% <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> not the black eyed one's
>>
>>Would you be dreadfully offended if I referred you to
>>alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe?
>>
>>WTF, this is xpoasted there anyway, just for fun.
>>
>Since we in APIHNA haven't seen the context, we don't _know_ that the
>above is wrong (though it _probably_ is): it _could_ be referring to
>things that belong to the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say
>- whichever meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
>add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
>
>MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
of outrageous fortune, JPG. HNY to all lurkers.
--
Robin Bignall
Herts, England
Message has been deleted
Mack A. Damia
Dec 31, 2012, 1:43:44 AM12/31/12
to
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:28:53 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
wrote:
>Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>> >
>> >Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>> >watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
>>
>> Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
>
>s/ph/f HTH! :)
But we cater to apostrophilistines.
--
wrote:
>Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>> >
>> >Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>> >watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
>>
>> Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
>
But we cater to apostrophilistines.
--
Mike Fleming
Dec 31, 2012, 5:35:31 AM12/31/12
to
In article <1kvxu6j.vrpb9l2zfgieN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>,
--
Mike Fleming
sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) writes:
> J. P. Gilliver (John) <ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> J. P. Gilliver (John) <ju...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>
>
> Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
> watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
I'm another one watching the rears, cajustse.
> watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
--
Mike Fleming
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Mack A. Damia
Dec 31, 2012, 8:03:36 AM12/31/12
to
--
Mack A. Damia
Dec 31, 2012, 8:18:27 AM12/31/12
to
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:26:39 -0800, She's a Witch of Trouble in
Electric China Blue <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <6rc2e85f81kqrer90...@4ax.com>,
Better "watch". Phile could be a bastard.
--
--
Electric China Blue <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <6rc2e85f81kqrer90...@4ax.com>,
> Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:28:53 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>> >> >
>> >> >Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>> >> >watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
>> >>
>> >> Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
>> >
>> >s/ph/f HTH! :)
>>
>> But we cater to apostrophilistines.
>
>Apostrophiles or apostrophobes? Which phaction should I throw my phate too?
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:28:53 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>> >> >
>> >> >Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>> >> >watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
>> >>
>> >> Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
>> >
>> >s/ph/f HTH! :)
>>
>> But we cater to apostrophilistines.
>
Better "watch". Phile could be a bastard.
--
--
John M Ward
Dec 31, 2012, 9:12:04 AM12/31/12
to
In article <thq2e8hri6qho142b...@4ax.com>,
I'm here too, guarding my watch...
--
John M Ward, posting from the Apihna Arms' Comfy Chair
My "Fun with English" web page can now be found at:
www.john-ward.org.uk/personal/john/english
Mike Fleming <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> wrote:
--
John M Ward, posting from the Apihna Arms' Comfy Chair
My "Fun with English" web page can now be found at:
www.john-ward.org.uk/personal/john/english
Message has been deleted
Mack A. Damia
Dec 31, 2012, 10:03:48 AM12/31/12
to
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:41:39 -0800, She's a Witch of Trouble in
>In article <5243e8har5eb4jovt...@4ax.com>,
The Abominable Dr. for Piles?
>Beware the man with no hair.
I'm bald over.
--
>In article <5243e8har5eb4jovt...@4ax.com>,
> Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:26:39 -0800, She's a Witch of Trouble in
>> Electric China Blue <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <6rc2e85f81kqrer90...@4ax.com>,
>> > Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:28:53 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>> >> >> >watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
>> >> >
>> >> >s/ph/f HTH! :)
>> >>
>> >> But we cater to apostrophilistines.
>> >
>> >Apostrophiles or apostrophobes? Which phaction should I throw my phate too?
>>
>> Better "watch". Phile could be a bastard.
>
>The Abominable Dr Phile's?
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:26:39 -0800, She's a Witch of Trouble in
>> Electric China Blue <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <6rc2e85f81kqrer90...@4ax.com>,
>> > Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 06:28:53 +0000, sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe)
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Mack A. Damia <mybaco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> MC&HNY to all in APIHNA, which has sadly been very quiet of late!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Right back at you, JPG; it's good to see that the rearguard still keeps
>> >> >> >watch. But I'm forgetting my manners: Greetings, Apostrophans.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Shouldn't that be "apostropheans?
>> >> >
>> >> >s/ph/f HTH! :)
>> >>
>> >> But we cater to apostrophilistines.
>> >
>> >Apostrophiles or apostrophobes? Which phaction should I throw my phate too?
>>
>> Better "watch". Phile could be a bastard.
>
The Abominable Dr. for Piles?
>Beware the man with no hair.
I'm bald over.
--
Daniel James
Dec 31, 2012, 2:24:15 PM12/31/12
to
In article <1kvxu6j.vrpb9l2zfgieN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, Sn!pe
wrote:
> Greetings, Apostrophans.
Shouldn't that be Apostrophan's ... for fear of being off-topic?
BTW: What's a FNVW (in the subject line)?
Cheers,
Daniel.
.. and Happy 2013, everyone!
wrote:
> Greetings, Apostrophans.
Shouldn't that be Apostrophan's ... for fear of being off-topic?
BTW: What's a FNVW (in the subject line)?
Cheers,
Daniel.
.. and Happy 2013, everyone!
Daniel James
Dec 31, 2012, 2:24:15 PM12/31/12
to
In article <L8iuVVFd...@molly.mockford>, Molly Mockford wrote:
>> ... the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say - whichever
at issue, it's also its location.
Are we to contrast the black-eyed one with the green-nosed three, or the
black eyed-one with the red one who has no eyes?
Cheers,
Daniel.
>> ... the black-eyed one, whoever he might be. (I'd say - whichever
>> meaning is intended - that the addition of the hyphen would
>> add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
>
> You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
> with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour.
> Then you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but
> to the black eyed one.
It's not only the desirability (or otherwise) of an apostrophe that is
>> add clarity, but the apostrophe itself _might_ not be wrong.)
>
> You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
> with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour.
> Then you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but
> to the black eyed one.
at issue, it's also its location.
Are we to contrast the black-eyed one with the green-nosed three, or the
black eyed-one with the red one who has no eyes?
Cheers,
Daniel.
Nadegda
Dec 31, 2012, 4:36:21 PM12/31/12
to
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:24:15 +0000, Daniel James wrote:
> In article <1kvxu6j.vrpb9l2zfgieN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, Sn!pe
> wrote:
>> Greetings, Apostrophans.
>
> Shouldn't that be Apostrophan's ... for fear of being off-topic?
>
> BTW: What's a FNVW (in the subject line)?
The alt.usenet.kooks Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, who manages the
> In article <1kvxu6j.vrpb9l2zfgieN%sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, Sn!pe
> wrote:
>> Greetings, Apostrophans.
>
> Shouldn't that be Apostrophan's ... for fear of being off-topic?
>
> BTW: What's a FNVW (in the subject line)?
voting ballots and nominations and such.
Currently consists of a team of four of us: Phoenix aka "Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler {One of Four}", myself, kensi, and Andrew
Wilson.
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
>
> .. and Happy 2013, everyone!
Molly Mockford
Dec 31, 2012, 5:06:11 PM12/31/12
to
At 19:24:15 on Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Daniel James <dan...@me.invalid> wrote
in <VA.0000072...@me.invalid>:
>It's not only the desirability (or otherwise) of an apostrophe that is
>at issue, it's also its location.
*applause* Probably the last one of the year, taking us out in style!
>Are we to contrast the black-eyed one with the green-nosed three, or the
>black eyed-one with the red one who has no eyes?
The red numeral is six and it has no eyes but it does have an ear. The
one is black, and has an eye; the three is green, and has a nose.
However, for the sake of contrast, the green three's nose is yellow, the
red six's ear is purple, and the black eyed one's eye is puce. (Guess
he'd been celebrating early.)
in <VA.0000072...@me.invalid>:
>It's not only the desirability (or otherwise) of an apostrophe that is
>at issue, it's also its location.
>Are we to contrast the black-eyed one with the green-nosed three, or the
>black eyed-one with the red one who has no eyes?
one is black, and has an eye; the three is green, and has a nose.
However, for the sake of contrast, the green three's nose is yellow, the
red six's ear is purple, and the black eyed one's eye is puce. (Guess
he'd been celebrating early.)
Mike Fleming
Jan 1, 2013, 10:04:48 AM1/1/13
to
In article <L8iuVVFd...@molly.mockford>, Molly Mockford
<nospam...@mollymockford.me.uk> writes:
> You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
> with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour. Then
> you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but to the
> black eyed one.
But what if there are many black eyed ones, and it is to them that
> You don't need the hyphen if you visualise a series of numbers, each
> with some kind of facial feature and each of a different colour. Then
> you have something belonging not to the green nosed three, but to the
> black eyed one.
reference is being made?
--
Mike Fleming
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages