Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Is marrying more than one person any different than gay marriage?
4 views
Skip to first unread message
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Jan 6, 2012, 11:52:29 AM1/6/12
to
Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
"Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
"So anybody can marry several people?"
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comparing-gay-marriage-to-polygamy-20120106,0,4108242.story
The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
polygamy, but is one better than the other?
I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
fun.
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
"Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
"So anybody can marry several people?"
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comparing-gay-marriage-to-polygamy-20120106,0,4108242.story
The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
polygamy, but is one better than the other?
I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
fun.
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
Jenny6833A
Jan 6, 2012, 12:51:16 PM1/6/12
to
On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
> should open to marrying more than one person at once.
We should be open to that independent of gay marriage.
> Actually, you may ask, why get married?
Here's a better question: Why is the concept of "marriage" societally
useful?
:-)
Jenny
<comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>
> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>
>
> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
> should open to marrying more than one person at once.
> Actually, you may ask, why get married?
useful?
:-)
Jenny
ckdb...@gmail.com
Jan 6, 2012, 1:04:17 PM1/6/12
to
On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry after
the definition of informed consent is met? Adult men and women are
not pawns of the government, indeed, it's the other way around.
<comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>
> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>
>
> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
> fun.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
> fun.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry after
the definition of informed consent is met? Adult men and women are
not pawns of the government, indeed, it's the other way around.
duke
Jan 6, 2012, 3:39:14 PM1/6/12
to
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:51:16 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A <Jenny...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>
>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>
>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>
>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
Neither queer unions nor polygamy are approved by God.
>On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>
>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>
>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>
>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>> should open to marrying more than one person at once.
>
>We should be open to that independent of gay marriage.
>
>> Actually, you may ask, why get married?
>
>Here's a better question: Why is the concept of "marriage" societally
>useful?
>
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him.
*****
duke
Jan 6, 2012, 3:51:06 PM1/6/12
to
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdb...@gmail.com"
<ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>
>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>
>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>
>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>>
>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
>> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
>> fun.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
>Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
>government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
Marriage is God's word, and only he approves of the joining. If you want, you
<ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>
>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>
>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>
>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>>
>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
>> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
>> fun.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
>Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
>government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
can go do your dog and call it a marriage, but it's not.
Robert Weldon
Jan 6, 2012, 4:23:26 PM1/6/12
to
"duke" <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:5umeg7hk5ofv5qiji...@4ax.com...
news:5umeg7hk5ofv5qiji...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:51:16 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A <Jenny...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
>>No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
>
> Neither queer unions nor polygamy are approved by God.
Really? so why is there so much polygamy in the bible?
> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
>>No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
>
> Neither queer unions nor polygamy are approved by God.
DanielSan
Jan 6, 2012, 4:38:16 PM1/6/12
to
On 1/6/2012 12:51 PM, duke wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdb...@gmail.com"
> <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>> <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>>>
>>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>>> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
>>> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
>>> fun.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>>
>> Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
>> government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
>
> Marriage is God's word,
No, it isn't.
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdb...@gmail.com"
> <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>> <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
>>> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
>>> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
>>> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>>>
>>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>>> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
>>> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
>>> fun.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>>
>> Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
>> government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
>
> Marriage is God's word,
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Jan 7, 2012, 1:29:52 AM1/7/12
to
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Jan 7, 2012, 1:30:46 AM1/7/12
to
The real issues are ignored.
Paul David Wright
Jan 7, 2012, 2:01:09 AM1/7/12
to
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in
news:5umeg7hk5ofv5qiji...@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:51:16 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A
> <Jenny...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people.
>>> Usually, I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a
>>> point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone
>>> can marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC
>>> News. "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-
comp
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
>>No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
>
> Neither queer unions nor polygamy are approved by God.
>
>>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>>> should open to marrying more than one person at once.
>>
>>We should be open to that independent of gay marriage.
>>
>>> Actually, you may ask, why get married?
>>
>>Here's a better question: Why is the concept of "marriage" societally
>>useful?
>>
>
> It's God's way.
>
PROVE IT, Dork.
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
news:5umeg7hk5ofv5qiji...@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:51:16 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A
> <Jenny...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 6, 9:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people.
>>> Usually, I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a
>>> point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone
>>> can marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC
>>> News. "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-
comp
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
>>No, all forms of marriage are equal and should be treated equally.
>
> Neither queer unions nor polygamy are approved by God.
>
>>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>>> should open to marrying more than one person at once.
>>
>>We should be open to that independent of gay marriage.
>>
>>> Actually, you may ask, why get married?
>>
>>Here's a better question: Why is the concept of "marriage" societally
>>useful?
>>
>
> It's God's way.
>
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Paul David Wright
Jan 7, 2012, 2:02:30 AM1/7/12
to
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in
news:sjneg7trf9l98381b...@4ax.com:
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdb...@gmail.com"
> <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people.
>>> Usually, I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a
>>> point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone
>>> can marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC
>>> News. "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-
comp
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>>>
>>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>>> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
>>> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to
>>> have fun.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>>
>>Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
>>government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
>
> Marriage is God's word, and only he approves of the joining.
Still refuse to stop LYING, eh, Dork?
news:sjneg7trf9l98381b...@4ax.com:
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdb...@gmail.com"
> <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
>><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people.
>>> Usually, I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a
>>> point here...
>>>
>>> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone
>>> can marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC
>>> News. "So anybody can marry several people?"
>>>
>>> http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-
comp
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
>>> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>>>
>>> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
>>> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
>>> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to
>>> have fun.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>>
>>Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
>>government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
>
> Marriage is God's word, and only he approves of the joining.
Buddythunder
Jan 7, 2012, 3:51:05 PM1/7/12
to
On Jan 7, 9:39 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
God is unavailable for comment, so instead we get you. Huh. Can we get
someone else who is less... hateful? And more... sane?
someone else who is less... hateful? And more... sane?
Buddythunder
Jan 7, 2012, 3:51:52 PM1/7/12
to
On Jan 7, 9:51 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdbig...@gmail.com"
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:04:17 -0800 (PST), "ckdbig...@gmail.com"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
> ><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
> >> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> >> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> >> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> >> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>
> >>http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>
> >> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
> >> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
> >> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
> >> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
> >> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
> >> fun.
>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> >Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
> >government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
>
> Marriage is God's word, and only he approves of the joining. If you want, you
> can go do your dog and call it a marriage, but it's not.
Which god? Marriage is not a judeo-christian exclusive.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 6, 11:52 am, "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher"
> ><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually,
> >> I reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> >> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> >> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> >> "So anybody can marry several people?"
>
> >>http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-santorum-jeered-after-comp...
>
> >> The point is, of course, that he's opposed to both gay marriage and
> >> polygamy, but is one better than the other?
>
> >> I don't think so. Once this threshold of gay marriage is open, we
> >> should open to marrying more than one person at once. Actually, you
> >> may ask, why get married? Just do what you want but make sure to have
> >> fun.
>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> >Santorum is a right winged nutjob. Basically, what business does
> >government have in telling people who they can and cannot marry
>
> Marriage is God's word, and only he approves of the joining. If you want, you
> can go do your dog and call it a marriage, but it's not.
Earle Jones
Jan 7, 2012, 4:56:59 PM1/7/12
to
In article
<337565c3-d510-4ecb...@q8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
*
Strange and incorrect.
A "sin" is the breaking of a religious law.
A "crime" is the breaking of a civil law.
Some sins are also crimes: Murder, for example.
Some sins are not crimes: Coveting thy neighbor's wife, for example.
Some crimes are not sins: Owning slaves, for example.
I realize that some Christers (like duke, above) would like for all sins
to be crimes. Fortunately, our country doesn't work that way.
earle
*
<337565c3-d510-4ecb...@q8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Strange and incorrect.
A "sin" is the breaking of a religious law.
A "crime" is the breaking of a civil law.
Some sins are also crimes: Murder, for example.
Some sins are not crimes: Coveting thy neighbor's wife, for example.
Some crimes are not sins: Owning slaves, for example.
I realize that some Christers (like duke, above) would like for all sins
to be crimes. Fortunately, our country doesn't work that way.
earle
*
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Jan 8, 2012, 9:22:22 AM1/8/12
to
On Jan 7, 4:56 pm, Earle Jones <earle.jo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> In article
> <337565c3-d510-4ecb-baba-d9e3960e2...@q8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
I'd like to know why they think a good wholesome threesome is a sin.
> In article
> <337565c3-d510-4ecb-baba-d9e3960e2...@q8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Colanth
Jan 8, 2012, 1:22:54 PM1/8/12
to
the RCC existed in Jesus' day.
--
"I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example
of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved --
the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has
produced!" - John Adams
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Jan 8, 2012, 4:16:50 PM1/8/12
to
Seeing how evil swinging rates is in the Christian scale, you could
picture God punished Adam & Eve for having a threesome with the Devil.
It would sound more believable than them taking a bite from the Tree
of Knowledge and humanity paying for it. Where is the sense of justice
of this god?
http://christiannymphos.org/2009/03/10/interview-with-ex-swingers-seeing-gods-redemption-part-two/
The wife gives in to the deceit put out by this lover and lies to her
husband. I think the real evil is the lie.
Yeah, maybe it's a bad idea to have threesomes but for "ego" reasons,
not pleasing a god without a sense of justice. But from a practical
standpoint cheating is far more prevalent. Hypocrisy is a worse
disease than free love.
picture God punished Adam & Eve for having a threesome with the Devil.
It would sound more believable than them taking a bite from the Tree
of Knowledge and humanity paying for it. Where is the sense of justice
of this god?
http://christiannymphos.org/2009/03/10/interview-with-ex-swingers-seeing-gods-redemption-part-two/
The wife gives in to the deceit put out by this lover and lies to her
husband. I think the real evil is the lie.
Yeah, maybe it's a bad idea to have threesomes but for "ego" reasons,
not pleasing a god without a sense of justice. But from a practical
standpoint cheating is far more prevalent. Hypocrisy is a worse
disease than free love.
Kelsey Bjarnason
Jan 21, 2012, 3:39:23 AM1/21/12
to
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:52:29 -0800, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser
Philosopher wrote:
> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually, I
> reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> "So anybody can marry several people?"
IMO, the only relevant issue is, are all parties involved of the age of
Philosopher wrote:
> Hey, I finally have a good subject for the polyamory people. Usually, I
> reject Conservative values, but this candidate has a point here...
>
> "Are we saying everyone should have the right to marry? So anyone can
> marry anyone else?" Santorum asked, according to a video by NBC News.
> "So anybody can marry several people?"
majority, fully informed and consenting? If so, then it's up to *them*
who they marry, what genders are involved, how many of them are involved,
and whether there are two people or twelve in the bed on Tuesday nights.
Frankly, whatever arrangements my neighbour has, as long as nobody's
being harmed or coerced and he's not trying to date or marry me, his
preferences and/or orientation and/or quirks are completely irrelevant to
me.
John Baker
Jan 23, 2012, 7:06:22 AM1/23/12
to
Ben Kaufman
Jan 23, 2012, 1:43:26 PM1/23/12
to
The issue of marriage equality is to eliminate sexual discrimination and give
gays citizens the same marital rights as heterosexuals citizens.
Since polygamy sets bounds beyond what anyone else can legally do it is not
about equal rights.
Ben
0 new messages