<Bump> THERE IS NO GHOST IN THE FETUS IN THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS = 17.333 WEEKS

[rec.nude]

On 5/6/2023 00:34, Intelligent Party wrote:
> There is no ghost in the fetus in the first 17.333 Weeks = FOUR MONTHS.
>
> Women with FOUR MONTHS to abort, who do not abort; are COMMITTED to the pregnancy,
> and do not seek an abortion after four months. (While in illegal unholy States,
> women WITHOUT four months to abort, may still be seeking an abortion, after four
> months, as they have been DENIED, their human right to abortion).
>
> After FOUR MONTHS, of ability to abort, some women may still seek to abort a
> HANDICAPPED fetus. But there is likely NO GHOST in a handicapped fetus, BECAUSE
> the ghost comes in, BETWEEN four months and birth, and why would a ghost enter a
> handicapped fetus, until the last minute!?
>
> Furthermore, you have an ABSOLUTE right to separate your body, absolutely, so
> forced surrogate mothers of a handicapped fetus, is a CRIME!
>
> Would you bring a handicapped baby into the world, and tell it to live its whole
> entire life handicapped from birth? Even if there WAS a ghost in the fetus at
> some point, it looses WHAT? by reincarnating? It looses it's body, it's
> intelligence, it's property, it's friends, it's career; it has none! If your ONE
> YEAR OLD, got in an accident and lost its arms and its legs, would you put it to
> death, for its own sake? Would you wait until it was FIVE, to say, maybe you
> should take these suicide pills or a do a Heroin overdose tonight?
>
> Yet infant male Circumcision is a CRIME. Female Genital mutilation is a CRIME.
> Sexual assignment surgery of infant Hermaphrodites/Intersex is a CRIME. Female
> genital mutilation is like cutting the male dickhead off. Infant male
> circumcision is like trimming an infant female's pussy lips. Doing this to a baby
> is like doing this to an ADULT AGAINST THEIR WILL. All three atrocities are
> obviously against the Hippocratic oath and should be OUTLAWED!
>
> Yet the RELIGIOUS RIGHT, believe in life before life, and life after death, so why
> would they believe, you come out of a zygote? Every religion confirms
> reincarnation. (Jesus confirmed John the Baptist is the reincarnation of Elijah.
> Reincarnation is not the only option, yet a common choice.)
>
> It's all population vs. property; it's all labor vs. capital. Poverty and unequal
> poverty are the root of all kinds of evil, and overpopulation is the root of
> poverty. Overpopulation is the scourge of our nation! Bankrupt unskilled
> immigrants, from poor countries, are let in by Democrats, and Bankrupt unskilled
> unplanned children, are let in by Republicans! Both parties are OUT OF IT, and
> deserve redemption!
>
> Yet we SHOULD have FREE ABORTIONS, in the FIRST FOUR MONTHS, for EVERYONE, but
> parental consent is a CRIME! EVERY TEEN HAS AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO ABORTION,
> WITHOUT THEIR PARENTS PERMISSION, NOR NOTIFICATION! Further, children are meant
> to be BROUGHT UP, and not belittled, eleven year olds are adults, and should be
> treated as such, and afforded the EQUAL RIGHTS OF MAN.
>
> Yet if you do not use birth control, you will get pregnant tonight, in a single
> sex act. Use hormonal plus one, of either condoms, pull-out, or diaphragm, OR use
> all the other three, condoms, pull-out, and diaphragm, concurrently.
>
> For on the pill alone, in twelve years, you will be pregnant.
>
> For sporadic sex, Men should use condoms and pull-out concurrently.
> For ongoing sex, men should use hormonal plus one, or all the other three,
> concurrently.
> For both sporadic and ongoing sex, Women should always use hormonal plus one, or
> all the other three concurrently, since they initially have no control over
> pull-out anyway, to keep it simple.
>
> While using hormonal birth control, should basically be a woman's independent
> choice; AS ONLY 25% of women actually are ON hormonal birth control, and IUDs; its
> basically going to be condoms and the pull-out method, or you additionally get a
> diaphragm going, or bring back the Today Sponge, to the market, who's patent has
> expired, and anyone can now commercially produce (or add the rhythm method).
>
> For sporadic sex, men merely use condoms and pull-out.
>
> For ongoing sex, men use HORMONAL PLUS ONE, or all the other three, of condoms and
> pull-out and diaphragm.
>
> Women always use hormonal plus one, or all the other three of condoms and pull-out
> and diaphragm (to remain simple, as control over the pull-out with a new friend is
> limited anyway).
>
> (so there are two analytical questions: 1) whether ongoing or sporadic, and 2)
> whether using hormonal or not; means four possibilities).
>
> What actually *is* sporadic, is a question: While the number of sex acts used to
> determine the risks is 80-100 per year, (eight per month), it MAY be, that as few
> as just TWO acts per month (24 per year) may actually make it just as dangerous as
> eight times per month. 30% of couples, trying, get pregnant in 1 month, 30% in 3
> months, 20% in 6 months, 20% in 12 months or longer.
>
> Women who do not have access to either hormonal or a diaphragm, may want to
> consider learning the rhythm methods, and using condoms and pull-out, two weeks
> out of month when safe, and abstaining from intercourse other two weeks. This
> makes for TWO methods, rhythm and condoms, INITIALLY, and then THREE when, control
> over pull-out is more possible with an ongoing more trusted partner.
>
> And keeping semen out of orifices is a general good idea for sporadic sex. And
> for sporadic sex you want condoms for STDs.
>
> So for ongoing, you have more sex, which makes it more dangerous for pregnancy,
> but you don't have to worry as much about STDs (assuming you have only one
> partner) especially if you get tested for HIV, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, & Syphilis.
> (NO tests for Herpes, Crabs, Scabies, Trichomoniasis; but be vaccinated for
> HPV/Warts & Hepatitis A and B).
>
> Sex is a positive holy religious activity, which should NOT be condemned, but
> unsafe sex is immoral, for unplanned childbirth is the scourge of nations. Thus,
> slut pride, not slut shame!
>
> Lasciviousness, both in and out of the bedroom, is a human right!
>
> It's no porn star's fault, they got pregnant. They have promiscuous sex for their
> job! (Porn stars are masters of the pull-out method 1/25, yet it doesn't work so
> well for the common folk 1/3).
>
> There is no love in this world, for people who don't have sex. Behind every
> successful person is love, because behind every successful person is energy.
> Premarital sex is obviously recommended, and it is recommended you have sex with
> more than one person in your life, and more than one person before you get married!
>
> THERE IS NO GHOST IN THE FETUS, IN THE FIRST _FOUR MONTHS_ = 17.333 WEEKS!
>
> IF THERE IS NO GHOST, IT IS IMMORAL TO *NOT* ABORT! IT IS IMMORAL TO *NOT* ABORT!
>
>
> IT IS IMMORAL TO *NOT* ABORT!
>
>
> People have memories of being in the womb, and as the below comments show, people
> have memories of being in the afterlife and then being born. No one has memories
> of being in the womb more than five months before birth!
>
> See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjBasF0M3-4 and read the comments below the
> video, after you finish reading this post, for confirmation.
>
> We should have FREE FEDERAL ABORTIONS for everyone in the country. At less than
> $1,000 per abortion, 2 million abortions per year, would only cost $2 billion per
> year. Twenty-six million, unghosted fetuses, aborted in thirteen years x $15,000
> K-12, = $390 billion saved per year = $3.9 Trillion per decade saved.
>
> Every great civilization, is founded on population planning (not control), farms,
> universities, liberty, and (wilful) communal charity - saving capital while
> sharing the wealth!
>
>
> If there was a way to, would you force a woman to put her premature baby BACK into
> her uterus, or force the dad to attach it to himself? Preemies born at 21 weeks,
> live for 1-3 hours before dying. So I was like, was that somebody's past life? Or
> did they remember that at all, or even come into the preemie as a Spirit? My
> cousin was a preemie, in an incubator, and she remembers trying to see if she was
> going to be that person.
>
>
> I ask you, how has the U.S. Supreme Court, in its criminal ignorance, not been
> impeached for overturning abortion? They're not holy priests, nor authorities.
> They're just normal people like you and me. We ALL have ability to opinion and
> judgement. No split court non 9-0 decision, should or could ever convince the
> nation. If the court is too stupid to convince the other's on the court, it
> surely can't have science 100%, or convince the nation. No-one should believe in,
> nor obey the court. The court is crime, and should be impeached. Why? Because
> we say. There is no higher authority than us.
>
> "Do you not know that we shall judge angels? How much more, things that pertain
> to this life?"
> - Paul the Apostle, 2 Corinthians 6:3, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV
>
>
> "Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the
> unrighteous, and not before the saints? Do you not know that the saints will
> judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to
> judge the smallest matters? Do you not know that we shall judge angels? How much
> more, things that pertain to this life? If then you have judgments concerning
> things pertaining to this life, do you appoint those who are least esteemed by the
> church to judge? I say this to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise
> man among you, not even one, who will be able to judge between his brethren? But
> brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers!
>
> Now therefore, it is already an utter failure for you that you go to law against
> one another. Why do you not rather accept wrong? Why do you not rather let
> yourselves be cheated? No, you yourselves do wrong and cheat, and you do these
> things to your brethren! Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit
> the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived."
> - Paul the Apostle, 1 Corinthians 6:1-6:9a, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+6%3A1-6%3A9&version=NKJV
>
> If Paul the Apostle condemned sexuality, I do not corroborate him there,
> yet he said many fine things which prove he's a Saint. You don't have to agree
> with everything he said, yet if half of what he said, is true, and you corroborate
> him, he corroborates you. For instance, he obviously knew nothing of
> Hermaphrodites/Intersex/Nonbinary, which is biologically proven to be as common as
> red hair. So what, are hermaphrodites not supposed to have sex or get married?
> He even condemned adultery, which Jesus patently forgave (though it remains an
> error to insult and lie to your spouse).
>
> Further:
> "Now concerning virgins: I have no commandment from the Lord; yet I give judgment
> as one whom the Lord in His mercy has made trustworthy."
> - Paul the Apostle, 2 Corinthians 7:25, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV
> https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+7%3A25&version=NKJV
>
> Rather his whole authority on sexuality, and his condemnation of such things, I
> would think!
>
> Nevertheless, UNSAFE sex is immoral, for it takes a risk with another person's
> life - the baby's (as well as your own - though as to your own, that's not
> immorality, but your choice, and _bad_ for you; not wrong). So plan to use two or
> three types of birth control, concurrently, Hormonal plus One, - or Condoms, plus
> Diaphragm, plus Pull-Out, - or ABORT!
>
> King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.
>
> Sex is a positive holy religious activity, which should NOT be condemned, but
> unsafe sex is immoral, for unplanned childbirth is the scourge of nations.
>
>

<Bump>