On 5/28/22 6:00 PM,
governo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2022 14:51:20 -0400, "25.BX945" <
25B...@nada.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/28/22 6:28 AM,
governo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> And thereby hangs the tale. Everybody wants us to be able to predict
>>> and head off such mass murderers but nobody's interested in condoning
>>> thought police. Minority Report anyone?
>>
>>
>> Heh, heh ... pretty good ........
>>
>> What it would REALLY take to THAT precisely anticipate
>> and control humans ... well, how many levels of horrific
>> are there ?
>
> Would take a lot of resources. Huge numbers of psychologists for one.
Hmm ... who shrinks the shrinks ? :-)
Is homosexuality "normal variation" or "serious mental
illness" THIS week ?
For fun, find a few expositions on DSM-V ... the latest
shrink manual. Absolutely anybody can be found to be
insane/dangerous and bundled off for "treatment" (for
everyone's good, of course)
> Software to read posts looking for keywords or phrases to escalate to
> a human for review. Neighbors reporting neighbors for any/all kinds
> of "strange behavior" "He collects stamps! STAMPS! He can't collect
> Chippendale, Van Gogh or model Ts like everybody else?"
>
> And all that info would have to go into a record to evaluate current
> communications with.
This is where "AI" tech comes in strong. It CAN deal with
all that info and make a statistical dossier. After that
it checks the latest info and can find 'deviations'. Some
of those will be flagged to the Thought Police.
Imagine what the Stasi could have done with all of todays
tech. We may be about to find out.
>> But nobody thinks it out, they see A thing they wish hadn't
>> happened and demand something be DONE so it never happens
>> again.
>
> Exactly. Banning guns outright is not the answer. Ultimately, the
> answer is figuring out why we have such a violent culture and fixing
> that.
Any time people can't get what they want they get frustrated
and a chip falls into the "kick ass" bucket on the scale. Alas
it's impossible to please all of the people all of the time
(outside of a serious VR existence). However society/govt CAN
find ways to throw some chips into the "be content" bucket on
the scale. It's usually very expensive however, maybe more than
any society can afford in the long term.
But the problem isn't "guns" per-se, they are just a means to
an end. A single match can do far more damage. The problem is
how humans are wired-up. SOME, neo-Marxists usually, think that
humans are born tabula-rasa, blank slates, and can be "programmed"
anyway you want. These are the ones who say your school-kids
aren't yours, but the State's. Even they are gonna find out
eventually that 3 billion years of "wiring" limit what they
can actually accomplish. In the end, DREAD serves best, keep
everyone afraid of what happens if they deviate from the
approved paradigm.
>> Unfortunately, with modern methods, it really MIGHT be
>> possible to get several levels into horrific. Cheap
>> tech for total surveillance exists now, computers and
>> "AI" to organize and sift through all that data looking
>> for "something". Behavior-mod/brainwashing, gulags, drugs
>> and theoretically even some species of brain implants ad hre
>> not sci-fi anymore. As a rule of thumb, if a tech CAN be
>> abused to empower a few then it WILL.
>
> Bill of Rights? If a government CAN do something, it probably will.
> Happened on Bush's watch *and* Obama's. The Patriot Act was a
> national disgrace.
Agreed. WAY too easy to abuse also. But again there was
an "incident" and everybody demanded something be DONE
to prevent another without thinking all that through.
Our friendly State was eager to oblige.
If you want the deep down Truth, read yer Machiavelli.
Power for its own sake, and how to get and hold it.
Under the surface, little has changed since his era
except now we have TV and the Net to help spread the
disinfo faster and better.
"You gave me fortune, you gave me fame, you gave me
power in your god's name ..."
>> And the worst thugs - you give them a badge. Hitler's
>> clique rose swiftly once it found that if you gave
>> the dregs official power they'd exercise it with joy
>> and abandon, revenge for every perceived insult they
>> had ever experienced.
>
> There are stories all over about how folks used the Internet to ruin
> somebody else's reputation by lying about them.
>
> But then, some people do it to themselves . . .
True.
But State-sponsored efforts are the scary bit - read
how the Chinese explain what they're doing "for" the
Uighurs .... straight out of Goebbels handbook.