Ted Nugent is a Domestic Terrorist
9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt
are you such a hypocrite?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=757_1187963465&p=1
US Federal Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 12 > § 231
§ 231. Civil disorders
(a)(1) Whoever teaches or demonstrates to any other person the use,
application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary
device, or technique capable of causing injury or death to persons,
knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be
unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder
which may in any way or degree obstruct, delay, or adversely affect
commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce or
the conduct or performance of any federally protected function.
Terroristic Threat Law & Legal Definition
* Terroristic Threat
A terroristic threat is a crime generally involving a threat to commit
violence communicated with the intent to terrorize another, to cause
evacuation of a building, or to cause serious public inconvenience, in
reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or
inconvenience. It may mean an offense against property or involving
danger to another person that may include but is not limited to
recklessly endangering another person, harassment, stalking, ethnic
intimidation, and criminal mischief.
The following is an example of a Texas statute dealing with
terroristic threats:
TERRORISTIC THREAT
(a) A person commits an offense if he threatens to commit any offense
involving violence to any person or property with intent to:
1. cause a reaction of any type to his threat[s] by an official or
volunteer agency organized to deal with emergencies;
2. place any person in fear of imminent serious bodily injury;
3. prevent or interrupt the occupation or use of a building; room;
place of assembly; place to which the public has access; place of
employment or occupation; aircraft, automobile, or other form of
conveyance; or other public place;
4. cause impairment or interruption of public communications,
public transportation, public water, gas, or power supply or other
public service;
5. place the public or a substantial group of the public in fear of
serious bodily injury; or
6. influence the conduct or activities of a branch or agency of the
federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.
Scotius (Ponti Fickatur)
Which Nugent, although a dork, did not do. He said he invited
Hillary to "ride one of these", etc. NEVER did he say he wanted to
shoot her, Obama, or advocate that anyone else should do so. In other
words, if the dozy bitch was to claim that she felt threatened, she
could be told to see a shrink, but he could not be prosecuted for it.
> 3. prevent or interrupt the occupation or use of a building; room;
>place of assembly; place to which the public has access; place of
>employment or occupation; aircraft, automobile, or other form of
>conveyance; or other public place;
> 4. cause impairment or interruption of public communications,
>public transportation, public water, gas, or power supply or other
>public service;
> 5. place the public or a substantial group of the public in fear of
>serious bodily injury; or
> 6. influence the conduct or activities of a branch or agency of the
>federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.
If by that you mean that if the pols realize that the attitude
of many toward "gun control" is "Go ahead and pass all the stupid laws
you want", then too bad.
9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt
wrote:
attitude
= of many toward "gun control" is "Go ahead and pass all the stupid
laws
= you want", then too bad.
Hillary is much smarter and wiser than Obama, there is no comparison.
As far as Nugent I think we should leave the decision as to what he
did or did not do wrong to the courts and a Federal judge. The man is
quite obviously not very stable mentally and a menace to society
waving his guns around making terroristic threats in threatening the
lives of our elected officials.