Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Negros With Guns....

20 views
Skip to first unread message

Tracey12

unread,
Apr 19, 2012, 11:45:43 PM4/19/12
to

Ann Coulter
Negroes with guns
by Ann Coulter
04/18/2012

Liberals have leapt on the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Florida
to push for the repeal of "stand your ground" laws and to demand
tighter gun control. (MSNBC'S Karen Finney blamed "the same people who
stymied gun regulation at every point.")

This would be like demanding more funding for the General Services
Administration after seeing how its employees blew taxpayer money on a
party weekend in Las Vegas.

We don't know the facts yet, but let's assume the conclusion MSNBC is
leaping to is accurate: George Zimmerman stalked a small black child
and murdered him in cold blood, just because he was black.

If that were true, every black person in America should get a gun and
join the National Rifle Association, America's oldest and most august
civil rights organization.

Apparently this has occurred to no one because our excellent public
education system ensures that no American under the age of 60 has the
slightest notion of this country's history.

Gun control laws were originally promulgated by Democrats to keep guns
out of the hands of blacks. This allowed the Democratic policy of
slavery to proceed with fewer bumps and, after the Civil War, allowed
the Democratic Ku Klux Klan to menace and murder black Americans with
little resistance.

(Contrary to what illiterates believe, the KKK was an outgrowth of the
Democratic Party, with overlapping membership rolls. The Klan was to
the Democrats what the American Civil Liberties Union is today: Not
every Democrat is an ACLU'er, but every ACLU'er is a Democrat. Same
with the Klan.)

In 1640, the very first gun control law ever enacted on these shores
was passed in Virginia. It provided that blacks -- even freemen --
could not own guns.

Chief Justice Roger Taney's infamous opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford
circularly argued that blacks could not be citizens because if they
were citizens, they would have the right to own guns: "[I]t would give
them the full liberty," he said, "to keep and carry arms wherever they
went."



With logic like that, Republicans eventually had to fight a Civil War
to get the Democrats to give up slavery.

Alas, they were Democrats, so they cheated.

After the war, Democratic legislatures enacted "Black Codes," denying
black Americans the right of citizenship -- such as the rather crucial
one of bearing arms -- while other Democrats (sometimes the same
Democrats) founded the Ku Klux Klan.

For more than a hundred years, Republicans have aggressively supported
arming blacks, so they could defend themselves against Democrats.

The original draft of the Anti-Klan Act of 1871 -- passed at the
urging of Republican president Ulysses S. Grant -- made it a federal
felony to "deprive any citizen of the United States of any arms or
weapons he may have in his house or possession for the defense of his
person, family, or property." This section was deleted from the final
bill only because it was deemed both beyond Congress' authority and
superfluous, inasmuch as the rights of citizenship included the right
to bear arms.

Under authority of the Anti-Klan Act, President Grant deployed the
U.S. military to destroy the Klan, and pretty nearly completed the
job.

But the Klan had a few resurgences in the early and mid-20th century.
Curiously, wherever the Klan became a political force, gun control
laws would suddenly appear on the books.

This will give you an idea of how gun control laws worked. Following
the firebombing of his house in 1956, Dr. Martin Luther King, who was,
among other things, a Christian minister, applied for a gun permit,
but the Alabama authorities found him unsuitable. A decade later, he
won a Nobel Peace Prize.

How's that "may issue" gun permit policy working for you?

The NRA opposed these discretionary gun permit laws and proceeded to
grant NRA charters to blacks who sought to defend themselves from Klan
violence -- including the great civil rights hero Robert F. Williams.

A World War II Marine veteran, Williams returned home to Monroe, N.C.,
to find the Klan riding high -- beating, lynching and murdering blacks
at will. No one would join the NAACP for fear of Klan reprisals.
Williams became president of the local chapter and increased
membership from six to more than 200.

But it was not until he got a charter from the NRA in 1957 and founded
the Black Armed Guard that the Klan got their comeuppance in Monroe.

Williams' repeated thwarting of violent Klan attacks is described in
his stirring book, "Negroes With Guns." In one crucial battle, the
Klan sieged the home of a black physician and his wife, but Williams
and his Black Armed Guard stood sentry and repelled the larger,
cowardly force. And that was the end of it.

As the Klan found out, it's not so much fun when the rabbit's got the
gun.

The NRA's proud history of fighting the Klan has been airbrushed out
of the record by those who were complicit with the KKK, Jim Crow and
racial terror, to wit: the Democrats.

In the preface to "Negroes With Guns," Williams writes: "I have
asserted the right of Negroes to meet the violence of the Ku Klux Klan
by armed self-defense -- and have acted on it. It has always been an
accepted right of Americans, as the history of our Western states
proves, that where the law is unable, or unwilling, to enforce order,
the citizens can, and must act in self-defense against lawless
violence."

Contrary to MSNBC hosts, I do not believe the shooting in Florida is
evidence of a resurgent KKK. But wherever the truth lies in that case,
gun control is always a scheme of the powerful to deprive the
powerless of the right to self-defense.

Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:27:26 AM4/20/12
to
Ann Coulter conveniently ignores one central fact that is inconvenient
to her case.

And that fact is: HISTORY DID NOT STOP IN 1964.

Yes, it is true that the Klan was important to JIM CROW SOUTHERN
DEMOCRATS in their efforts to keep blacks under control after
Emancipation.

What Coulter does not mention, and what every other rightwinger
refuses to recognize is the simple fact that after LBJ pushed through
the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, SOUTHERN JIM CROW DEMOCRATS
DESERTED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND BECAME SOUTHERN JIM CROW
REPUBLICANS.

Why this shift? Because Richard Nixon recognized that Southern bigots
hated blacks more than they hated Republicans. Nixon recognized that
he could reach out to Southern whites using code words -- states'
rights, local intiative, school choice -- and they would flock to the
GOP, bringing their bigotry, racism, and hatred with them.

And they did exactly that.

Perahps Coulter -- or Tracey -- can explain this.

Ronald Reagan was born and reared in Illinois. He went to California
to seek -- and find -- fortune and fame. When he received the GOP
presidential nomination, where did he go to make his first speech as a
candidate, thereby setting the tone for his campaign?

Did he make that speech in Illinois, celebrating his middle America
roots? Or did he make that speech in California, celebrating the land
of opportunity?

NEITHER.

Reagan's first speech as the GOP candidate was made in PHILADELPHIA,
MISSISSIPPI, site of one of the most heinous, obscene lynchings of the
entire civil rights era. In that speech, Reagan said "I support
states' rights." He DID NOT MEAN he supported the 10th Amendment to
the Constitution. He meant that, if elected president, his Justice
Department would not enforce civil rights and voting rights laws.
Instead, he would leave the states free to treat their black citizens
any way they wanted to -- which was music to the ears of the former
KKK Democrats, now KKK Republicans.

The history of the Republican Party since the mid-1960's has been a
complete repudiation of Lincoln and a complete adoption of the evils
of the Jim Crow Democrats.

And this is why Coulter's article is of no value -- because she
refuses to recognize the facts of today's GOP.

Mike Smith

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 10:09:49 AM4/20/12
to
So it should be exceptionally easy for you to name a few KKKers that
switched parties around 1964.

Mike Smith

First. Post

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 10:17:45 AM4/20/12
to
Are they still trying to preach that load of bullshit?

http://www.black-and-right.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/

Not to mention the fact that the democrats have ALWAYS had a pathetic record on
civil rights:

October 13, 1858
During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) states:
“I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my
brother, or any kin to me whatever”; Douglas became Democratic Party’s 1860
presidential nominee

April 16, 1862
President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia; in
Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no

July 17, 1862
Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes Confiscation
Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy “shall be forever free”

January 31, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous
Republican support, intense Democrat opposition

April 8, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican
support, 63% Democrat opposition

November 22, 1865
Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “black
codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination

February 5, 1866
U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully
opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule”
relief by distributing land to former slaves

April 9, 1866
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto; Civil
Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans,
becomes law

May 10, 1866
U.S. House passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and
equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no

June 8, 1866
U.S. Senate passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and
equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and
100% of Democrats vote no.

January 8, 1867
Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law
granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of
legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans

March 30, 1868
Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson,
who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am
President, it shall be a government of white men”

September 12, 1868
Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and 24 other African-Americans in
Georgia Senate, every one a Republican, expelled by Democrat majority; would
later be reinstated by Republican Congress

October 7, 1868
Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a
white man’s country: Let white men rule”

October 22, 1868
While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR)
is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan

December 10, 1869
Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation law
granting women right to vote and to hold public office

February 3, 1870
After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition,
Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans
regardless of race

May 31, 1870
President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff
penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights

June 22, 1870
Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the
civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South

September 6, 1870
Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after women’s suffrage signed into
law by Republican Gov. John Campbell

February 28, 1871
Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for
African-American voters

April 20, 1871
Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic
Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans


October 10, 1871
Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting,
African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto murdered by
Democratic Party operative; his military funeral was attended by thousands

October 18, 1871
After violence against Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses
Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux
Klan

November 18, 1872
Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady
Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”

January 17, 1874
Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to
racially integrate government

September 14, 1874
Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to
overthrow racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William
Kellogg; 27 killed

March 1, 1875
Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations
without regard to race, signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with
92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition

January 10, 1878
U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment for
women’s suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before election
of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919. Republicans foil
Democratic efforts to keep women in the kitchen, where they belong

February 8, 1894
Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland join to repeal
Republicans’ Enforcement Act, which had enabled African-Americans to vote

January 15, 1901
Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Party’s refusal
to permit voting by African-Americans

May 29, 1902
Virginia Democrats implement new state constitution, condemned by
Republicans as illegal, reducing African-American voter registration by 86%

February 12, 1909
On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, African-American
Republicans and women’s suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the
NAACP

May 21, 1919
Republican House passes constitutional amendment granting women the vote
with 85% of Republicans in favor, but only 54% of Democrats; in Senate, 80% of
Republicans would vote yes, but almost half of Democrats no

August 18, 1920
Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of
Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled
legislatures

January 26, 1922
House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching
a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster

June 2, 1924
Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by Republican
Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans

October 3, 1924
Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William
Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National
Convention

June 12, 1929
First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an
African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats
across the country

August 17, 1937
Republicans organize opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S.
Senator Hugo Black, appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background
was hidden until after confirmation

June 24, 1940
Republican Party platform calls for integration of the armed forces; for the
balance of his terms in office, FDR refuses to order it

August 8, 1945
Republicans condemn Harry Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan.
The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the
Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a
friend that “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of
women and children, revolts my soul.”

September 30, 1953
Earl Warren, California’s three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican
vice presidential nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark
decision in Brown v. Board of Education

November 25, 1955
Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel

March 12, 1956
Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown
v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation

June 5, 1956
Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in
decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law

November 6, 1956
African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy
vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President

September 9, 1957
President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

September 24, 1957
Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon
Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to
Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public
schools

May 6, 1960
President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960,
overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

May 2, 1963
Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over
2,000 African-American schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

September 29, 1963
Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank
Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High
School

June 9, 1964
Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S.
Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the
Senate

June 10, 1964
Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster
against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial
equality. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a
staggering majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most
southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of
them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois
Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act
passed.

August 4, 1965
Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts
to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark
civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose. Voting Rights Act of
1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to
prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of
Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

February 19, 1976
President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s
notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000
Japanese-Americans during WWII

September 15, 1981
President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on
Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American
participation in federal education programs

June 29, 1982
President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act

August 10, 1988
President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating
Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War
II internment ordered by FDR

November 21, 1991
President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen
federal civil rights legislation

August 20, 1996
Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial
discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes
law

And let’s not forget the words of liberal icon Margaret Sanger, founder of
Planned Parenthood…

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with
social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful
educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want
the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population….

So the next time any Democrat claims they’ve been supportive of civil rights in
America (and been so all along), ask them to explain their past. “We’ve grown”
is not gonna cut it, considering they continue to lie about their past to this
day, and only someone lacking in common sense would believe two distinct
political parties could juxtaposition their stances on civil rights seemingly
overnight.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:15:30 PM4/20/12
to

Far righties are nothing if not hypocrites.

Ann Coulter and Tracey write something that *presumably* (wink, wink)
supports the idea that Republicans are not racists.

Then, they have the nerve to use a racist term ("Negros With Guns"),
filled with hatred, in their "defense".

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:24:53 PM4/20/12
to
Mike,

Once again, I dare you people to find ONE CASE in which the Democratic
party is linked to the KKK and/or Neo-Nazis.

Disclaimer: YES, WE ALL KNOW THE PAST, please stay on this side of the
last HALF CENTURY. Robert Byrd recanted and is DEAD.

Keep in mind that the folks working on a time machine (the wet dream
of all far rigthies) have found really serious OBSTACLES. They have
doubts that it will ever be done.

The fact is that the Democrats and Republicans have switched sides,
respect to RACISM. Abraham Lincoln would NEVER be a Republican today.

The Nazis -Neo or Paleo- are far RIGHT, you would have to be blind
(genuine or pretend) to deny it.

-Ramon
Message has been deleted

Tracey12

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:41:08 PM4/20/12
to
Go back to Venezuela, Ramon.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:44:29 PM4/20/12
to
Does that ever work?

You just used a racist subject line, on purpose.

-Ramon

Tracey12

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:46:08 PM4/20/12
to
Why don't you ask Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell why they are
Republicans, and why they reject the radical values of the God hating,
statists of the democrat party.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:53:07 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 9:09 am, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
Racism comes predominantly -almost exclusively- from the RIGHT side.
The least you could do is have some cojones and OWN to it.

The only ones qualified to make an statement are the victims of
prejudice, persecution and racism themselves. Let's ask them, shall
we?

Here's their response:

- Black folks voted for Obama, by a 98% margin.

- Jewish folks voted for Obama, by a 75% margin.

- Hispanic folks voted for Obama, by a 66% margin.

- Oriental folks voted for Obama, by a 63% margin.

- Gay folks voted for Obama, by an unknown margin.

Hatred is firmly on YOUR side.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 12:45:51 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 9:17 am, First. Post <OccupiersDumberThanD...@invalid.net>
wrote:
I wish all problems were this trivially easy to solve...

If you want to avoid racism from Democrats, here is an infallible way:
Should you find yourself in a time machine, whatever you do, DO NOT
DIAL THE KNOB to the 1800s!! In fact, STAY AWAY FROM any year before
1965!!!

Again: I wish all problems were this trivially easy to solve!!

-Ramon

Mike Smith

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 1:33:10 PM4/20/12
to
You cannot even name a single KKKer that switched from democrat to
republican? Is this just another libtard urban legend?
Of course it is.

Mike Smith

Mike Smith

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 1:34:20 PM4/20/12
to
Please explain, O Stupid One, exactly how Negros With Guns is racist.

Mike Smith

Ted Parvo

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:05:09 PM4/20/12
to
You lose.






> The least you could do is have some cojones and OWN to it.
>
> The only ones qualified to make an statement are the victims of
> prejudice, persecution and racism themselves. Let's ask them, shall
> we?
>
> Here's their response:
>
>  - Black folks voted for Obama, by a 98% margin.
>
>  - Jewish folks voted for Obama, by a 75% margin.
>
>  - Hispanic folks voted for Obama, by a 66% margin.B

Ted Parvo

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 1:59:53 PM4/20/12
to
Now the word Negro is racist.

There is a Central Committee somewhere which decides these things.

Ted Parvo

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:03:59 PM4/20/12
to
To draw out racialist propagandists. The ploy worked.

What if someone were to dare defy this edict, and refused to play the
game by your rules?


Billary

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:06:10 PM4/20/12
to
Ramonsito, Ramonsito, Ramonsito, Eres muy pendejo hoy.

You're so full of hate you exuded it out of all your pores. How do
you live with yourself.

You stand in the middle of the room and point fingers at the haters.

Then you post such nonsense. Shame on you Ramonsito.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:41:43 PM4/20/12
to
I say hatred is on your side, you say it is in mine. The reference is
extremely simple.

I dare you to find ONE religious denomination or church of whose
(public!) position on immigration you are proud.

There are 350,000 churches in the US. All you need is ONE and you win
the argument.

I claim that ALL OF THEM are on my side.

-Ramon

Disclaimer: The following are exceptions to the "Herrera Challenge,
Religious Edition":

(1) Publishers of White Supremacist books.
(2) The Westboro Baptist Church ("God Hates Fags")
(3) The Koran Burners of Gainesville, FL.
(4) Any KKK-related church.

All the above are on the anti-immigrant (anti-Hispanic, same thing
really) side, aka, baggers. They are on YOUR side.

Billary

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:42:46 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 2:41 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 1:03 pm, Ted Parvo <parvo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Contrary to everything you've ever said. Zimmerman did clearly have a
head wound:

http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_george_zimmerman_head_dm_120419_wmain.jpg


Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:47:21 PM4/20/12
to
Hey, I grew up in Venezuela, okay? I don't know -or care. My challenge
remains.

http://www.economicrefugee.net/new-az-immigration-law-ties-to-white-supremacists/
http://www.adl.org/main_Extremism/White_Supremacists_July_4_Tea_Parties.htm

There is a direct, undeniable, uninterrupted ideological right from
the Nazis to the US far right.

Check with Francisco Franco and Augusto Pinochet, for starters.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:53:06 PM4/20/12
to

"Billary" <billarycl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f154cf56-376a-49c2...@er9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
Probably done by make-up artist.

-Ramon,



Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:54:51 PM4/20/12
to
Not necessarily, but in this case seems unnecessary and leads to that
suspicion, specially given the background of Coulter, Tracey and his
followers.

You need to read about languages (I studied linguistics at MIT, under
the father of modern linguistics, that commie Noam Chomsky). There are
many nuances that you ignore, not sure whether on purpose.

Let's say you call a Jew "the chosen one". They are, after all! That
is how they define themselves!

If you are in a ghetto, alone, and a young person approaches you,
would you call him "boy"? He IS A BOY, fer cryin' out loud!

Blacks (and only Blacks!!) can call each other nigga' and their ladies
hos, just like you can discipline and spank your children but not your
neighbors'.

If you prefer unambiguous, formally defined languages, stick to
computer languages. Human ones are too complex for your (by YOU
chosen) simplification.

You are referred to alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage.

The use of the term "Negro" is HYPOCRISY. The mixing with the term
"GUNS" is an attempt to manipulate and instill FEAR.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 2:57:13 PM4/20/12
to
Accuser, Judge and Jury much?

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:01:03 PM4/20/12
to

"Billary" <billarycl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:848cd75a-1e6e-476a...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
would take your life to standby your view?

I would. I will put a bullet in my head to prove that I'm right and you
are wrong.

You far racist are not only racist but a wrong. YOU ARE WRONG!!!


-Ramon, A Single Bullet in My Brain is the Answer!


George Kerby

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:01:30 PM4/20/12
to



On 4/20/12 9:17 AM, in article jnr2p7prhhs66elna...@4ax.com,
> łI do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my
> brother, or any kin to me whatever˛; Douglas became Democratic Partyąs 1860
> presidential nominee
>
> April 16, 1862
> President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia;
> in
> Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no
>
> July 17, 1862
> Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes
> Confiscation
> Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy łshall be forever free˛
>
> January 31, 1865
> 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous
> Republican support, intense Democrat opposition
>
> April 8, 1865
> 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican
> support, 63% Democrat opposition
>
> November 22, 1865
> Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting
> łblack
> codes,˛ which institutionalized racial discrimination
>
> February 5, 1866
> U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully
> opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement ł40 acres and a
> mule˛
> relief by distributing land to former slaves
>
> April 9, 1866
> Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnsonąs veto; Civil
> Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans,
> becomes law
>
> May 10, 1866
> U.S. House passes Republicansą 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and
> equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no
>
> June 8, 1866
> U.S. Senate passes Republicansą 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
> and
> equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and
> 100% of Democrats vote no.
>
> January 8, 1867
> Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnsonąs veto of law
> granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.
>
> July 19, 1867
> Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnsonąs veto of
> legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans
>
> March 30, 1868
> Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson,
> who declared: łThis is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am
> President, it shall be a government of white men˛
>
> September 12, 1868
> Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and 24 other African-Americans in
> Georgia Senate, every one a Republican, expelled by Democrat majority; would
> later be reinstated by Republican Congress
>
> October 7, 1868
> Republicans denounce Democratic Partyąs national campaign theme: łThis is
> a
> white manąs country: Let white men rule˛
>
> October 22, 1868
> While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR)
> is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan
>
> December 10, 1869
> Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation
> law
> granting women right to vote and to hold public office
>
> February 3, 1870
> After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat
> opposition,
> Republicansą 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans
> regardless of race
>
> May 31, 1870
> President U.S. Grant signs Republicansą Enforcement Act, providing stiff
> penalties for depriving any Americanąs civil rights
>
> June 22, 1870
> Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the
> civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South
>
> September 6, 1870
> Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after womenąs suffrage signed
> into
> law by Republican Gov. John Campbell
>
> February 28, 1871
> Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection
> for
> African-American voters
>
> April 20, 1871
> Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic
> Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans
>
>
> October 10, 1871
> Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting,
> African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto murdered by
> Democratic Party operative; his military funeral was attended by thousands
>
> October 18, 1871
> After violence against Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses
> Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux
> Klan
>
> November 18, 1872
> Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady
> Stanton that she voted for łthe Republican ticket, straight˛
>
> January 17, 1874
> Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to
> racially integrate government
>
> September 14, 1874
> Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to
> overthrow racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William
> Kellogg; 27 killed
>
> March 1, 1875
> Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations
> without regard to race, signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with
> 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition
>
> January 10, 1878
> U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment
> for
> womenąs suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before
> election
> of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919. Republicans
> foil
> Democratic efforts to keep women in the kitchen, where they belong
>
> February 8, 1894
> Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland join to repeal
> Republicansą Enforcement Act, which had enabled African-Americans to vote
>
> January 15, 1901
> Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Partyąs
> refusal
> to permit voting by African-Americans
>
> May 29, 1902
> Virginia Democrats implement new state constitution, condemned by
> Republicans as illegal, reducing African-American voter registration by 86%
>
> February 12, 1909
> On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincolnąs birth, African-American
> Republicans and womenąs suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the
> Republicans condemn Harry Trumanąs surprise use of the atomic bomb in
> Japan.
> The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the
> Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a
> friend that łThe use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of
> women and children, revolts my soul.˛
>
> September 30, 1953
> Earl Warren, Californiaąs three-term Republican Governor and 1948
> Republican
> vice presidential nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark
> decision in Brown v. Board of Education
>
> November 25, 1955
> Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel
>
> March 12, 1956
> Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Courtąs decision in
> Brown
> v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation
>
> June 5, 1956
> Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in
> decision striking down łblacks in the back of the bus˛ law
>
> November 6, 1956
> African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph
> Abernathy
> vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President
>
> September 9, 1957
> President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Partyąs 1957 Civil Rights Act
>
> September 24, 1957
> Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon
> Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to
> Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public
> schools
>
> May 6, 1960
> President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicansą Civil Rights Act of 1960,
> President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Rooseveltąs
> notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000
> Japanese-Americans during WWII
>
> September 15, 1981
> President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on
> Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American
> participation in federal education programs
>
> June 29, 1982
> President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act
>
> August 10, 1988
> President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating
> Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World
> War
> II internment ordered by FDR
>
> November 21, 1991
> President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen
> federal civil rights legislation
>
> August 20, 1996
> Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial
> discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicansą Contract With America,
> becomes
> law
>
> And letąs not forget the words of liberal icon Margaret Sanger, founder of
> Planned ParenthoodŠ
>
> We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with
> social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most
> successful
> educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We donąt want
> the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro populationŠ.
>
> So the next time any Democrat claims theyąve been supportive of civil rights
> in
> America (and been so all along), ask them to explain their past. łWeąve grown˛
> is not gonna cut it, considering they continue to lie about their past to this
> day, and only someone lacking in common sense would believe two distinct
> political parties could juxtaposition their stances on civil rights seemingly
> overnight.

Excellent post, again!

George Kerby

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:05:36 PM4/20/12
to



On 4/20/12 11:36 AM, in article
6bd3a712-7a4c-454d...@2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com, "Ramon F.
Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

> On Apr 20, 9:17 am, First. Post <OccupiersDumberThanD...@invalid.net>
>> łI do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my
>> brother, or any kin to me whatever˛; Douglas became Democratic Partyąs 1860
>> presidential nominee
>>
>>     April 16, 1862
>>     President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia;
>> in
>> Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no
>>
>>     July 17, 1862
>>     Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes
>> Confiscation
>> Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy łshall be forever free˛
>>
>>     January 31, 1865
>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous
>> Republican support, intense Democrat opposition
>>
>>     April 8, 1865
>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican
>> support, 63% Democrat opposition
>>
>>     November 22, 1865
>>     Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting
>> łblack
>> codes,˛ which institutionalized racial discrimination
>>
>>     February 5, 1866
>>     U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully
>> opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement ł40 acres and a
>> mule˛
>> relief by distributing land to former slaves
>>
>>     April 9, 1866
>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnsonąs veto; Civil
>> Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans,
>> becomes law
>>
>>     May 10, 1866
>>     U.S. House passes Republicansą 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>> and
>> equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no
>>
>>     June 8, 1866
>>     U.S. Senate passes Republicansą 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>> and
>> equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and
>> 100% of Democrats vote no.
>>
>>     January 8, 1867
>>     Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnsonąs veto of law
>> granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.
>>
>>     July 19, 1867
>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnsonąs veto of
>> legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans
>>
>
>
> I wish all problems were this trivially easy to solve...
>
> If you want to avoid racism from Democrats, here is an infallible way:
> Should you find yourself in a time machine, whatever you do, DO NOT
> DIAL THE KNOB to the 1800s!! In fact, STAY AWAY FROM any year before
> 1965!!!

Ramon the Racist again, snips a post in an attempt to make him look
intelligent.

Again, it doesn't work...

George Kerby

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:07:19 PM4/20/12
to



On 4/20/12 11:45 AM, in article
943ba631-18e5-4bdb...@s7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, "Ramon F.
Again, it is not working, Ramon the Racist, you still are dumber than a lump
of lignite, and, again, it shows...

Ted Parvo

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:07:26 PM4/20/12
to
Hatred or tribal animus is part of mankind, not exclusive to whites.

The most virulent and disruptive tribalism today is among Latinos and
blacks in America today. Whites dare not even use the word "negro"
without risking condemnation.


> I dare you to find ONE religious denomination or church of whose
> (public!) position on immigration you are proud.

I didn't cite any religion. But were I asked to cite the most
exclusionary, imPerialistc, racist, homophobic, misogynist, care to
guess which I might cite?

>
> There are 350,000 churches in the US. All you need is ONE and you win
> the argument.

You've changed the subject




>
> I claim that ALL OF THEM are on my side.


Your ride is disingenuous, and is propaganda, nothing more.



>
> -Ramon
>
> Disclaimer: The following are exceptions to the "Herrera Challenge,
> Religious Edition":
> ...
>
> read more »

George Kerby

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:14:27 PM4/20/12
to



On 4/20/12 12:59 PM, in article
4f3a9d9c-1d89-4b35...@r9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, "Ted
Ask Sandy BotWheat, he'll tell ya!

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:17:22 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 2:05 pm, George Kerby <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ramon the Racist again, snips a post in an attempt
> to make him look intelligent.
>
> Again, it doesn't work...

Pray tell: Against what race am I being racist?

I am damn proud of my race, the WHITE race. I have nothing but
admiration for Anglos, the creators of the greatest country in
history. I hope to become a bone fide gringo some day.

I respect and feel sorry for all the abuses committed against the
noble Native Americans and Black folks.

Jewish folks are my buddies, my khaveyrim (not to mention role model
for the nascent Hispanic Lobby). Long live Israel, our brothers and
partners forever.

The white race has been the most successful in history, warts and all.
I am not quite proud of all our actions, but not ashamed, either.

The white race rocks! (although we don't always rule)

So, what race am I against? Albinos?

Hatred is clearly on YOUR side.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:19:41 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 2:07 pm, George Kerby <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:


> Again, it is not working, Ramon the Racist, you still are dumber
> than a lump of lignite, and, again, it shows...

My MIT professors would beg to differ.

NO, I was not beneficiary of Affirmative Action, was a foreign student
at the time.

-Ramon

Silen...@hotmail.com

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:25:34 PM4/20/12
to
David Duke.

Early in his political career, he ran for public office as a Democrat,
but failed to win any elections.

In 1988, Duke switched party affiliation from Democrat to Republican,
where he was promptly elected to the Louisiana House of
Representatives.

So, we've a KKK Democrat who loses election after election, who then
switches to the Republican party and wins political office.

Does that answer your question, rightard?

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.


Ramon F Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:27:53 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 2:01 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> "Billary" <billaryclinton2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
The above post is by the fake "Ramon", an islander who is barely
literate. Filled by hatred, to boot.

Check the headers.

-Ramon

Ramon F Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:32:08 PM4/20/12
to
Great example!

How about another one (in the opposite direction): Martin Luther King.
Was originally Republican, but as soon as he realized where the racism
was, switched parties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.

-Ramon

Ramon F Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 3:58:20 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 12:33 pm, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:

> > > So it should be exceptionally easy for you to name a few
> > > KKKers that switched parties around 1964.
>
> > > Mike Smith
>
> >Mike,
>
> >Once again, I dare you people to find ONE CASE in which the Democratic
> >party is linked to the KKK and/or Neo-Nazis.
>
> >Disclaimer: YES, WE ALL KNOW THE PAST, please stay on this side of the
> >last HALF CENTURY. Robert Byrd recanted and is DEAD.
>
> >Keep in mind that the folks working on a time machine (the wet dream
> >of all far rigthies) have found really serious OBSTACLES. They have
> >doubts that it will ever be done.
>
> >The fact is that the Democrats and Republicans have switched sides,
> >respect to RACISM. Abraham Lincoln would NEVER be a Republican today.
>
> >The Nazis -Neo or Paleo- are far RIGHT, you would have to be blind
> >(genuine or pretend) to deny it.
>
> >-Ramon
>

> You cannot even name a single KKKer that switched from democrat
> to republican? Is this just another libtard urban legend?
> Of course it is.
>
> Mike Smith

Strom Thurmond.

Let's check with the Georgia Encyclopedia.

"Many white voters who initially cast Dixiecrat ballots gravitated
back toward the Democratic Party only grudgingly, and they remained
nominal Democrats at best. Ultimately, the Dixiecrat movement paved
the way for the rise of the modern Republican Party in the South. Many
former Dixiecrat supporters eventually became Republicans, as was
highlighted by Strom Thurmond's conversion in the 1960s. "

http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-1366
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

-Ramon

Ted Parvo

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 5:26:03 PM4/20/12
to
I can judge a lie well, Ramon.
>
> -Ramon

First. Post

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:12:56 PM4/20/12
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:01:30 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Always amazing how the left keeps preaching their little myths even though the
evidence that shows them to be completely full of bullshit is overwhelming yes?

First. Post

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:15:51 PM4/20/12
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:36 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
>>> ³I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my
>>> brother, or any kin to me whatever²; Douglas became Democratic Party¹s 1860
>>> presidential nominee
>>>
>>>     April 16, 1862
>>>     President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia;
>>> in
>>> Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no
>>>
>>>     July 17, 1862
>>>     Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes
>>> Confiscation
>>> Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy ³shall be forever free²
>>>
>>>     January 31, 1865
>>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous
>>> Republican support, intense Democrat opposition
>>>
>>>     April 8, 1865
>>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican
>>> support, 63% Democrat opposition
>>>
>>>     November 22, 1865
>>>     Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting
>>> ³black
>>> codes,² which institutionalized racial discrimination
>>>
>>>     February 5, 1866
>>>     U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully
>>> opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement ³40 acres and a
>>> mule²
>>> relief by distributing land to former slaves
>>>
>>>     April 9, 1866
>>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson¹s veto; Civil
>>> Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans,
>>> becomes law
>>>
>>>     May 10, 1866
>>>     U.S. House passes Republicans¹ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>>> and
>>> equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no
>>>
>>>     June 8, 1866
>>>     U.S. Senate passes Republicans¹ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>>> and
>>> equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and
>>> 100% of Democrats vote no.
>>>
>>>     January 8, 1867
>>>     Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson¹s veto of law
>>> granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.
>>>
>>>     July 19, 1867
>>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson¹s veto of
>>> legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans
>>>
>>
>>
>> I wish all problems were this trivially easy to solve...
>>
>> If you want to avoid racism from Democrats, here is an infallible way:
>> Should you find yourself in a time machine, whatever you do, DO NOT
>> DIAL THE KNOB to the 1800s!! In fact, STAY AWAY FROM any year before
>> 1965!!!
>
>Ramon the Racist again, snips a post in an attempt to make him look
>intelligent.
>
>Again, it doesn't work...

Ramon obvioulsy believes that when he snips passages in order to create his own
lies that it deletes that part of a post from all previous posts as well. Could
the guy show himself to be any more of an idiot?


linuxgal

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 8:10:49 PM4/20/12
to
Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

> In 1988, Duke switched party affiliation from Democrat to Republican,
> where he was promptly elected to the Louisiana House of
> Representatives.

He was still nothing but sheet for brains.

linuxgal

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 8:19:44 PM4/20/12
to
Ted Parvo wrote:
> On Apr 20, 11:15 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>> Far righties are nothing if not hypocrites.
>>
>> Ann Coulter and Tracey write something that *presumably* (wink, wink)
>> supports the idea that Republicans are not racists.
>>
>> Then, they have the nerve to use a racist term ("Negros With Guns"),
>> filled with hatred, in their "defense".
>>
>> -Ramon
>
> Now the word Negro is racist.

Somebody better tell the United Negro College Fund, no?

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 8:44:17 PM4/20/12
to
You familiar with CONTEXT?

You didn't strike me as a hypocrite, but I guess it is a requirement
for being accepted as far conservative.

-Ramon

Poor Repressed, Deprived, Victimized RepublicLoons

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 8:59:18 PM4/20/12
to

>

That is all Tranny Annie wanted to say ... She writes
this bullshit piece of shit .. but the title is all the content
she intended to say anyway.

And the Loons lick it up.




--
--> Slow thinkers --> Stay Right

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 9:05:00 PM4/20/12
to

The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
hypocrites...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html

Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
are intellectually honest.

-Ramon

Romney: A Polygamist whose career has been destroying America's middle class

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 9:27:49 PM4/20/12
to
On 4/20/2012 8:05 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
> The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> hypocrites...\

They like to use those secret words .. wink , wink.
"welfare" , "food stamps", "sitting at home waiting on a check"


You can tell they are lairs because none of those programs
exist anymore they way they infer to them:

"welfare" is really SS payments to retired .. and
they have had to pay into it to earn it. No working age
adults get "welfare". None. Neither do illegals.

I make fun of my retired neighbors when they bitch about Obama ..
I call them welfare double dippers because they have retirement
and take SS .. They don't like to hear the truth.

"food stamps" -SNAP program for impoverish families with
kids under 18 only and some senior citizens on SS who qualify .

Unemployment Insurance .. only for those who earned it . and for
a limited time. There is no food stamps in EI either so
don't spend that taxable $400 a week all at once on the
steaks, lotto, smokes, and booze .


blah blah. They never mention whites recv most of those too.


<crickets>



--
---
Conservatives remind me of Yosemite Sam, Wile E. Coyote, and Elmer
Fudd. They bring the guns, the stupidity, and of course, the failure.

Clifton Vergara

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:51:57 PM4/20/12
to
'Lickin' Ass and Fakin' Military Service' is a Proven Fraud, a Proven
Liar and a Proven Thief. She is the most prolific liar in this
newsgroup and also the most prolific thief of other's writings. She is
also a Stolen Valor stain on America. Note that when you reply to a
Proven Liar you encourage them to continue lying.

[][][][][][]


The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:55:57 -0400, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
<PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Re: But I thought it was only the Black Man??
>-- We all know about their [Palin's] oldest daughter -- wine coolers, tent,
>bastard child, dancing with the stars, scam abstinence program

Oops! Caught lying...

Bristol Palin Earns $262,000 as Abstinence Ambassador
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/bristol-palin-earns-262000-as-abstinence-ambassador-201154

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

K Caren Haas

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:53:18 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>NB1: Which is the only state that has 4 asses and 4 pees?
>NB2: In Spanish, Misipipi ("Me hice pipí") means: "I peed myself".

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Me hice" = "I did"

"Me pipí" = "I piss"

"Me hice pipí" = "I peed"

"yo mismo" = "myself"
http://translate.google.com/#auto|es|drinks%20pee

What does "Ramon bebidas de pis" translate to??????????????

Agatha Vicki Rush

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:53:27 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


Frauds are BUSTED and EXPOSED:

alt.politics IP Search Results File: C:\AP_Data\Q_66.162.85.70.txt
07/10/2011

This search result file generated by DemocRAT Hall Of Shame.Com
Copyright© 2010-2011 DemocRAT Hall Of Shame.Com
---------------------------------------------------------------

Cambridge Ray <ra...@conexus.net>|66.162.85.70
Google Poster <gopo...@jonjay.com>|66.162.85.70
Lucius Sanctimonious <conco...@gmail.com>|66.162.85.70
Ramon F Herrera <gopo...@jonjay.com>|66.162.85.70
Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net>|66.162.85.70

Search start: Sun 7/10/2011 11:02:21 AM - End: Sun 7/10/2011 11:02:23
AM

---------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright© 2010-2011 DemocRAT Hall Of Shame.Com

From: Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com>
From: Lucius Sanctimonious <conco...@gmail.com>
From: Ramon F Herrera <gopo...@jonjay.com>
From: Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 190.37.71.130
190.37.71.130 = Barquisimeto, Venezuela.

From: Google Poster <gopo...@jonjay.com>
From: Lucius Sanctimonious <conco...@gmail.com>
From: Ramon F Herrera <gopo...@jonjay.com>
From: Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.199.50.99
98.199.50.99 = Houston, TX

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

Q Vincent Camarillo

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:53:51 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:43:10 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>The radio station with the most listeners in the US -in any language-
>happens to broadcast in Spanish. Look it up...

Oop! Caught LYING, again:

Oops! Top 15 Talk Radio (No beaners...)
http://talkers.com/online/?p=71

Oops! Only #13!

Los Angeles Radio Ranker
Time Period: Mo-Su 6A-12A
Survey: March 2010 - Dates in 3/4/2010 to 3/31/2010
Target: P6+
Estimate: Shares
AVG Daily Population: 12,125,300
AVG Daily In-Tab: 2,471
Percent of Population (Daily): 100
Market: Los Angeles
Geography: Los Angeles-METRO
Ranking Outlet Format JAN 10 FEB 10 MAR 10
1 KIIS-FM Pop Contemporary Hit Radio 5.4 5.6 5.7
2 KOST-FM Adult Contemporary 3.9 4.8 4.7
3 KRTH-FM Classic Hits 4.7 4.5 4.6
4 KFI-AM News Talk Information 4.1 4.2 4.1
5 KAMP-FM Pop Contemporary Hit Radio 3.1 3.5 4.0
6 KTWV-FM Smooth AC 2.9 3.5 3.5
7t KLOS-FM Album Oriented Rock 3.3 3.2 3.4
7t KBIG-FM Hot Adult Contemporary 3.4 3.5 3.4
9t KROQ-FM Alternative 2.8 3.2 3.3
9t KPWR-FM Rhythmic Contemporary Hit Radio 3.0 3.4 3.3
9t KCBS-FM Adult Hits 3.2 3.2 3.3
12 KHHT-FM Rhythmic Oldies 3.5 3.2 3.2
13 KLVE-FM Spanish Contemporary 3.6 3.4 3.1
http://www.arbitron.com/home/ppm_data.htm

Audra D. Barone

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:54:00 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:26:20 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>We can have an idea how far (read: unconstitutional) the pending AZ
>law is, by noticing that Marco -a guy who has criticized RONALD REAGAN
>as being soft on immigration- is against the racially-profiling
>legislation.
>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/27/rubio-criticizes-controversial-arizona-immigration-law
>http://tinyurl.com/2ct4enc

Oops! Caught LYING, again:

"He did not say outright whether he opposes or supports the bill."

Z Caruso

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:54:09 PM4/20/12
to
Known as SilentNigger. Flint, MI. After numerous beatings for lying
SilenMonkey went crazy, became malicious. He calmed down after he was
given a banana. He is also almost certainly a registered sex
offender. He was caught trying (and failed) to crash the The DemocRAT
Hall Of Shame website http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

Today he is mostly a frightened usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they
have been exposed, frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo
monkey who sits in the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying
nothing of value. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Mon, 11 May 2009 16:48:33 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On May 11, 6:34 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 May 2009 09:45:45 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
>> Now explain how you "migrate my groups list."
>No

You LIED.

>> Now explain how you "migrate the kill file."
>No

You LIED.

>> Now explain how you "migrate my settings."
>No

You LIED.

>> Prove me wrong..
>Nope.

You LIED.

>> >I said "I know how to migrate my groups list".
>> Prove it.
>Nope.

You LIED.

>> >I said "I know how to migrate the kill file".
>> Prove it...
>Nope.

You LIED.

Game over....

Foster Cordelia Hollis-Humphrey

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:54:35 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:14:15 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote:
> Message-ID: <879f0a55-a0ff-43e9...@p17g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
>Nobody would deny me the chance to rehabilitate myself. Look at
>Martha Stewart, illegal stock trader,

LIAR!!

"convicted of lying to investigators about a stock sale and served
five months in prison."

Tommie Fernando Malik

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:54:43 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On 9 Aug 2009 14:47:07 -0400, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net>
wrote:
>This is something I don't find in the JFK literature, but I read it in
>the Dallas Sixth Floor Museum. Immediately after the assassination,
>the *people* (not the press!) pointed their finger to the "Minutemen"
>as the organization behind JFK's murder.

"In my own native state of Massachusetts, the battle for American
freedom was begun by the thousands of farmers and tradesmen who made
up the Minute Men -- citizens who were ready to defend their liberty
at a moment's notice. Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens
who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the
preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who
are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom. The
cause of liberty, the cause of American, cannot succeed with any
lesser effort." JFK - January 29, 1961.
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Roosevelt+Day+Commemoration+Message.htm

>Fast forward 2009: We still have

We still have YOU LYING...

Marylee Ferro

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:55:10 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:27:05 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>Let me tell you just one item. Fox News is not even available in most
>cable outlets outside the USA.

Oops! The taco-sniffing turd-colored Lawn Boy has been caught LYING,
again:

FOX News Channel Provider List by Country

Provider Contact Info
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184837,00.html

Pan Asia
Star www.startv.com

Argentina
Direct TV www.directvla.com.ar

Australia
Austar www.austar.com.au
Foxtel www.foxtel.com.au
Optus Pay TV www.optus.com.au
Virgin Blue (airline) www.virginblue.com.au

Bahamas
CableBahamas www.cablebahamas.com

Barbados
CBC Mutichannel www.cbcbarbados.bb

Bermuda
Bermuda Cablevision www.cablevision.bm

Bolivia
Imagen de Television Satelital tvc...@bivosi.scz.entel.bo

Brazil
Net Brazil
RCA Company De Telecomunicacoes ander...@uol.com.br
Sky Brazil www.skyweb.com.br

Cambodia
Phnom Penh Cable TV www.ppctv.com.kh

Canada
Access Communications www.accesscomm.ca
Aliant Telecom Inc. www.aliant.net
Askivision Systems www.aski.ca
Aurora Cable www.aci.on.ca
Bell ExpressVu www.expressvu.com
Bluewater TV Cable www.cabletv.on.ca
Bobcaygeon Cable
Cable Axion www.axion.ca
Cable Cable www.cablecable.net
Cable TV Slave Lake www.cable-lynx.net/slave
Campbell River TV Association www.crtv.net
City West Cable www.monarch.net
Cogeco www.cogeco.ca
Compton Cable TV www.compton.net
Conuma Cable Systems www.conumacable.com
Cross Country TV www.xcountry.tv
Davia Cable
Direct 2 Home TV con...@direct2hometv.com
Eastlink www.eastlink.ca
Ex-Cen Cablevision www.cabletv.on.ca
Execulink Cablecom www.execulink.com
Fenelon Falls Cable Ltd.
Kincardine Cable Tv www.portal.tnt21.com
MASCON www.mascon.bc.ca
Milk River Cable victor...@mrcable.ca
Mountain Cablevision www.mountaincable.net
MTS Allstream www.mts.mb.ca
New North Networks www.inuviktv.com/frame.html
North Nova Cable nnova...@eastlink.ca
Northwestel Cable www.coastcable.com
Novus Entertainment www.novusnow.ca
Persona Communications www.tvnwt.com
Raftview Communications www.mercuryspeed.com
Rogers Cable www.rogers.com
SaskTel Max www.sasktel.com
Seaview Communications www.seaviewcable.net
Shaw Cable www.shawcable.com
Source Cable www.sourcecable.ca
Star Choice www.starchoice.com
Sun Country Cablevision www.sunwave.net
Telus Communications www.telus.com
Ucluelet Video www.ucluelet.ukeecable.net
Westman Communications www.westmancom.com
Yourlink Inc. www.yourlink.ca

Cayman
WestStar www.weststartv.com

Chile
Directv www.directvchile.cl
VTR www.lgi.com/chile

Colombia
Cablepacifico www.cablepacifico.com
Directv www.directvla.com
EPM
Gremial
Superview www.superview.com.co
TV Cable

Costa Rica
Amzak www.amzak.com
Cable Tica www.teletica.com
Supercable maurice...@supercable.co.cr

Dominican Republic
Speilcom SA
Aster Comunicaciones cgo...@aster.net.do
Tricom www.tricom.net

Ecuador
Direct TV www.directvla.com.ec

El Salvador
Amzak www.amzak.com

Grenada
Grenada Cable www.candw.gd

Guatemala
Comtech www.comtech.net.gt
Prosat

Honduras
Amzak www.amzak.com

Hong Kong
PCCW www.nowbroadbandtv.com/eng

Iceland
Icelandic Broadcasting Corp.
Icelandic Television Company www.skjarinn.is

Indonesia
First Media www.firstmedia.com
Indovision www.indovision.tv
PT. Indosat Mega Media www.indosatm2.com
Telkomvision www.telkomvision.com/default.asp

Ireland
Sky www.sky.co.uk

Israel
Yes www.yes.co.il

Italy
Sky Italia www.skytv.it

Jamaica
Allied www.alliedcablevision.com
Entertainment Systems Ltd. cabl...@cwjamaica.com
Jamaica Amalgamated Cable System
Logic One Ltd log...@cwjamaica.com
Oliver
Sauce Communication Network www.saucecomm.com
Telstar

Japan
Americable (Distributor for American Bases) site.americablejapan.com
Mediatti (Kadena Air Base) www.mediatti.com
World on Demand

Kazakhstan
Alma TV amend...@almatv.kz
ICON Limited
LLP Digital
Mitta Steel
Tengizchevroil

Macau
Macau Cable www.macaucabletv.com

Malaysia
Astro www.astro.com.my/v5
Star Cruise (Super Star Gemini) www.starcruises.com/Fleet/Gemini
Star Cruise (Super Star Virgo) www.starcruises.com/Fleet/Virgo

Maldives
Mesco www.mesco.com.mv

Mexico
Cablemas
Cablevision www.cablevision.com.mx
CV Monterrey
Inter-Cable de Victoria, SA de CV
Jesus Ernesto Soto Vega
Maria Irma Salazar Leon ant...@prodigy.net.mx
PCTV www.pctv.com.mx
Sky Mexico www.esmas.com/sky

Mideast
Arab Digital Distribution http://www.adduniverse.com
Econet www.econetcarrier.com
Evision www.evision.ae
Q-te www.qtel.com.qa
Tecom www.du.ae

The Netherlands
CAIW www.caiw.nl
Stichting CAI Hardewijk www.caihwk.nl

New Zealand
Sky Networks www.skytv.co.nz

Nigeria
TrendTV www.trendtv.tv

Pakistan
Cable Plus
Video City Cable Network
Cable Network www.hccnp.net.pk
Rousch Power Plant, www.rouschpak.com
City Cable TV Network
Sahar Cable
SM Cable Network
Chiniot Cable Network
Fauji Kabirwala Power Company Ltd
Depalpur Cable Communication,
MB Cable Network
T A Star Cable Network
S.S Cable Network
Five Star
Excel Cable Network
Global Satellite Cable Network
Fox Tel Network
Video Link
Music Zone International
Web Com (Pvt) Ltd
Ain Dice Satellite Cable Network
Nayatel ( Pvt) Ltd www.nayatel.com
Four Star Cable Network
Fox Tel Cable Network,
Candid Associates
Trivision Multi Channel
New Global Communication
Rex Cable Network
S.A Cable Network
Nizari Communication
Tahir Cable Network
Esquire Cable Network
Bismah Cable Network
Seven Friends Cable Network
Tracks Entertainment
Classic Cable Network
Global Cable Network
Luvis Cable Network
Paramount Cable Network
Sky Net Cable Ent Network
Home Entertainment ( K C S )
Star Cable Network
The Citi Communication Reg
WorldCALL Telecom Limited www.worldcall.com.pk
Rana Cable Network
City Cable Gulshan
Mehran Network (Pvt) Ltd
Show Time
Star Cable TV Network
Mian Cable Network
K+ Entertainment cable
New Digital Cable
Kashmir Cable Network
New Hollywood Cable System
WorldCALL Telecom Limited www.worldcall.com.pk
Rana Cable Network
City Cable Gulshan
Mehran Network (Pvt) Ltd
Show Time
Star Cable TV Network
Mian Cable Network
K+ Entertainment cable
New Digital Cable
Kashmir Cable Network
New Hollywood Cable System
WorldCall Telecom Limited www.worldcall.com.pk
Wateen Telecom www.wateeen.com
Al-Saba Cable
Four Star Cable Network
Video White
ABC Cable Network
O.K Video Centre & Cable
Sony Cable Network
Faisal Cable System
Max Cable Network
Sahar Cable Network
Simky Cable Network
Simky Cable Network
Sony Cable Network
5-Signals Battalian
Gandhara Cable Network
Mardan Cable
The View Cable Network
Star Cable

Palau
Island Cable www.palaunet.com

Panama
Cable Onda www.cableonda.com
Direct TV

Papua New Guinea
Channel 8 www.strong-technologies.com
Hitron www.hitron.com.pg

Peru
Boga Comunicaciones
Directv www.directv.com.pe

Philippines
Accion Cable (Distributor for Provincial Operators)
Central CATV (Beyond Cable)
Destiny Cable www.mydestiny.net
ParaSat Cable

Portugal
Clix SmarTV www.clix.pt
MEO www.meo.pt

Republic of Nauru, Fiji, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, New Caledonia
Strong Technologies Pty. Ltd. www.sakhalinenergy.com

Russia
Kriljon
OOO Hermstat

Singapore
StarHub Cable Vision www.starhub.com

Slovenia
T-2 d.o.o. www.t-2.net

Spain
Canal Satelite Digital www.plus.es
Grupalia Internet www.superbanda.tv
Jazz Telecom www.jazztelia.es
Novus
Sogecable www.sogecable.es

St. Kitts
The Cable wre...@thecable.net

St. Lucia
St. Lucia Cablevision www.candw.lc/Products/cable-vision-services
Helen Television www.htsstlucia.com

Thailand
Sansuk Network
True Visions www.truevisionstv.com
True Digital Entertainment

Trinidad
T and T Transcable

United Kingdom
Sky www.sky.com

Uruguay
Direct TV www.directvla.com.uy
Nuevo Siglo
Riselco S.A. www.nuevosiglo.com.uy

Venezuela
Direct TV www.directvla.com.ve
Intercable www.intercable.com.ve
NETUNO www.netuno.net
Supercable corp.supercable.com/venezuela/main.htm

Vietnam
HTV Choice Center www.htv.com.vn
Nacencomm

West Indies
Anguilla - CCCH Ltd.
Nevis - CCCH Ltd.
BVI Cable TV

=======================================

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:27:05 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>Fox News is not even available in most
>cable outlets outside the USA. Here in Venezuela, only one cable
>company carries it.

Oops! The taco-sniffing turd-colored Lawn Boy has been caught LYING,
again:

FOX News Channel Provider List by Country

Provider Contact Info
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184837,00.html

Venezuela
Direct TV www.directvla.com.ve
Intercable www.intercable.com.ve
NETUNO www.netuno.net
Supercable corp.supercable.com/venezuela/main.htm

====================================

Posting:

(2008) Nov: 106
Dec: 66 -38% Beatdown!
(2009) Jan: 8 -88% Massive Beatdown!
Feb: 5
Mar: 47
Apr: 193
May: 295
Jun: 97 -67% Beatdown!

Bob Lettie Rosenberg

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:55:18 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:01:56 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>When they ask me where I am from

Nobody asks you where you're from. You're obviously a Beaner so it
doesn't matter which Beaner Toilet you come from...

>So my answer is:
>"I am from the country that has produced:
> - The most Miss Universe winners

Wrong, Beaner:

USA = 7
Venezuela = 5

>ps: No disrespect intended.

List of Miss Universe titleholders
1952 Finland
1953 France
1954 USA
1955 Sweden
1956 USA
1957 Peru
1958 Colombia
1959 Japan
1960 USA
1961 Germany
1962 Argentina
1963 Brazil
1964 Greece
1965 Thailand
1966 Sweden
1967 USA
1968 Brazil
1969 Philippines
1970 Puerto Rico
1971 Lebanon
1972 Australia
1973 Philippines
1974 Spain
1975 Finland
1976 Israel
1977 Trinidad and Tobago
1978 South Africa
1979 Venezuela
1980 USA
1981 Venezuela
1982 Canada
1983 New Zealand
1984 Sweden
1985 Puerto Rico
1986 Venezuela
1987 Chile
1988 Thailand
1989 Netherlands
1990 Norway
1991 Mexico
1992 Namibia
1993 Puerto Rico
1994 India
1995 USA
1996 Venezuela
1997 USA
1998 Trinidad and Tobago
1999 Botswana
2000 India
2001 Puerto Rico
2002 Russia
2003 Dominican Republic
2004 Australia
2005 Canada
2006 Puerto Rico
2007 Japan
2008 Venezuela
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Miss_Universe_titleholders

Eula Nila Snider

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 6:55:25 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 21:20:12 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>Anyway... Soon the antis in the NGs gave up and decided that all
>Hispanics are to be attacked because they stick together.

Sounds good to me.

>Fast forward a few years...
>The score is as follows:
> - Pro-Immigransts: 45,999,997
> - Anti-immigrants: 3 (2 of them irrelevant)
>I think it is safe to call that a rather comfortable lead...

Oops! Ramon caight LYING, again:

Summary: Most of America wants YOU GONE!

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Oct. 16-18, 2009. "Would you
like to see the number of illegal immigrants currently in this country
increased, decreased, or remain the same?"
Increased: 3%
Decreased: 73%
Same: 22%

CBS News/New York Times Poll. April 22-26, 2009. "Which comes closest
to your view about illegal immigrants who are currently working in the
U.S.? (1) Apply for US citizenship. OR, (2) Temporary guest workers or
Leave the U.S."
Citizenship: 44%
Temp/Leave: 51%

ABC News/Washington Post Poll. April 21-24, 2009. "Do you think the
United States is or is not doing enough to keep illegal immigrants
from coming into this country?"
Doing Enough: 23%
Not Doing Enough: 74%

Gallup Poll. June 5-July 6, 2008. "Illegal immigrants in the long-run
become productive citizens and pay their fair share of taxes. OR,
Illegal immigrants cost the taxpayers too much by using government
services like public education and medical services."
Pay Fair Share: 31%
Cost Too Much: 63%

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. "Now thinking about
immigration, would you favor or oppose building a fence along 700
miles of the border with Mexico?"
Favor: 52%
Oppose: 47%

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll Dec. 14-17, 2007. "Would you say
that immigration helps the United States more than it hurts it, or
immigration hurts the United States more than it helps it?"
Helps More Than Hurts: 39%
Hurts More Than Helps: 52%
http://www.pollingreport.com/immigration.htm

Paul Duca

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 10:12:56 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 12:15 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> Far righties are nothing if not hypocrites.
>
> Ann Coulter and Tracey write something that *presumably* (wink, wink)
> supports the idea that Republicans are not racists.
>
> Then, they have the nerve to use a racist term ("Negros With Guns"),
> filled with hatred, in their "defense".
>
> -Ramon

And she states the lower levels of white conservatives are
"powerless"...but all she has to offer them is packing a gun to feel
better.


Paul

Paul Duca

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 10:13:32 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 12:46 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 11:15 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
> > Far righties are nothing if not hypocrites.
>
> > Ann Coulter and Tracey write something that *presumably* (wink, wink)
> > supports the idea that Republicans are not racists.
>
> > Then, they have the nerve to use a racist term ("Negros With Guns"),
> > filled with hatred, in their "defense".
>
> > -Ramon
>
> Why don't you ask Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell why they are
> Republicans, and why they reject the radical values of the God hating,
> statists of the democrat party.

Um...Republicans pay them lots of money to do so?

Paul

G Barry Corral

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 7:16:19 PM4/20/12
to
Ramon is foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron.".An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


Courtesy of Buster Norris:

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:51:48 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>> Immigration was a key topic in the debate
>The more interesting news is that 3 out of 3 candidates support
>Comprehensive Immigration Reform, which necessarily implies a Path to
>Citizenship.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Crist and Meek voiced support for a "path to citizenship" for the
estimated 11 million or more people in the country illegally, but
Rubio said the U.S. must first secure its borders and beef up
employment verification before attempting "modernization" of its
immigration laws."
Sep 17, 2010
Rubio breaks with Meek, Crist on immigration,
English-as-official-language in Univision debate
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/rubio-breaks-with-meek-crist-on-immigration-english-922622.html

Rubio, "...I think the only way you should have a path to citizenship
is if you enter this country legally via the legal immigration
process..."
Jun 28, 2010
http://www.examiner.com/hillsborough-county-conservative-in-tampa-bay/marco-rubio-on-tampa-s-am-970-wfla-this-morning

"Marco Rubio has changed his mind about the Arizona immigration law,
which he now supports whole-heartedly, to the point of actually
advocating the deportation of children to Latin American countries
where he admits the culture would be alien to them."
May 7, 2010
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/2010/05/07/marco_rubio_arizona_immigration_open2010

Paul Duca

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 10:16:38 PM4/20/12
to
On Apr 20, 8:59 pm, "Poor Repressed, Deprived, Victimized
RepublicLoons" <p...@earm.org> wrote:
> That is all Tranny Annie wanted to say ... She writes
> this bullshit piece of shit .. but the title is all the content
> she intended to say anyway.
>
> And the Loons lick it up.
>
While waiting for the chance to lick her up....


Paul

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,
Apr 20, 2012, 7:17:17 PM4/20/12
to

alt.politics IP Search Results File: C:\AP_Data\Q_75.108.88.95.txt
04/15/2012

This search result file generated by DemocRAT Hall Of Shame.Com
Copyright© 2010-2012 DemocRAT Hall Of Shame.Com
---------------------------------------------------------------

ABM Anyone But a Mormon <a...@loon.tard>|75.108.88.95
Alaskan Beaver Hunter <McM...@as.com>|75.108.88.95
Ayatollah Santorum <a...@asasa.com>|75.108.88.95
Ayatollah Santorum <a...@skll.com>|75.108.88.95
Busch Whacked <b...@laksdjc.com>|75.108.88.95
FEMA Rendition Camps Czar <fea...@poo.com>|75.108.88.95
Foo Young Chew <F...@eatme.com>|75.108.88.95
Fox News Blond Porn Starlets Outlet Mall
<ea...@asshole.com>|75.108.88.95
Fox News Blond Porn Starlets Outlet Mall
<Fuc...@eatme.com>|75.108.88.95
Fred G. Smit <nos...@ho.com>|75.108.88.95
Gun Control is hitting your target <ea...@gun.com>|75.108.88.95
Ignore the repressed deprived victimized republic Loons
<youarea...@ajksd.com>|75.108.88.95
King of Country of What <The...@lost.com>|75.108.88.95
Loon Scare: Agenda 21 <lo...@asdasd.com>|75.108.88.95
Loons jerk off daily on Sarah Palin book cover
<lo...@poo.com>|75.108.88.95
max headroom <maxhe...@localnet.com>|75.108.88.95
ObamaPhobia : Boo ! <o...@ph.com>|75.108.88.95
Poor Repressed Deprived Victimized Republic Loons
<youarea...@ajksd.com>|75.108.88.95
Poor Repressed Deprived Victimized RepublicLoons
<pr...@earm.org>|75.108.88.95
Rehashed and repeated propaganda. <re...@yahh.cooom>|75.108.88.95
Romney is an Anchor baby has Mexican Grandparents.
<MittI...@sss.com>|75.108.88.95
Romney: A Polygamist whose career has been destroying America s middle
class <r...@skls.com>|75.108.88.95
Romney: A Polygamist whose career has been destroying America s middle
class <suc...@laksdjl.com>|75.108.88.95
SALAMANDER : Another adulterous serial rapist in the GOP party exposed
<du...@askd.com>|75.108.88.95
Severe Conservative Syndrome <s...@sssdsd.com>|75.108.88.95
Slo Blow Me <2Amp...@spam.com>|75.108.88.95
Sympathy for the Devil <de...@me.com>|75.108.88.95
Tie your shoes Pull up your pants and Speak English.
<yoo...@yoo.com>|75.108.88.95
WB <w...@nospam.com>|75.108.88.95
What DID a Frothy Mixture of Shit do to be associated with Santorum ?
<als...@kas.com>|75.108.88.95

Search start: Sun 4/15/2012 9:42:02 PM - End: Sun 4/15/2012 9:42:15 PM
Rebuild: 4/15/12

---------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright© 2010-2012 DemocRAT Hall Of Shame.Com

Kenny McCormack

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 7:12:30 AM4/21/12
to
In article <ccf18c38-add9-4c2e...@d20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
That is pretty much it, isn't it?

--
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is
no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.

- John Kenneth Galbraith -

duke

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 8:04:33 AM4/21/12
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
wrote:

>
Too bad you didn't understand the "tarbaby" comment.

duke, American - American

*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him.
*****

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 11:03:14 AM4/21/12
to
On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> >hypocrites...
>
> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>
> >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
> >are intellectually honest.
>

> Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.

Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
subtext.

Racism is rarely overt, it is often insidious.

Too bad you don't understand the maxim about Caesar's wife.

Incidentally: Are you sure you want to take this discussion into the
realm of languages? I don't think it is wise. How many do you know?

-Ramon

Kenny McCormack

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 11:46:06 AM4/21/12
to
In article <f719905d-5cd9-4e9b...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
...
>Incidentally: Are you sure you want to take this discussion into the
>realm of languages? I don't think it is wise. How many do you know?

If Duke limited himself to going into problem spaces in which he could
handle himself and not get slaughtered, he wouldn't even be able to have a
conversation with himself.

--
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."

Al

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 12:11:06 PM4/21/12
to
In article
<f719905d-5cd9-4e9b...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

> On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> > <ra...@conexus.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> > >hypocrites...
> >
> > >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
> >
> > >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
> > >are intellectually honest.
> >
>
> > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.
>
> Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
> have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
> subtext.

In most discussions here, you seem to employ this vaunted skill to pump out
classic leftists class-war and racially-based transparent propaganda in a
style most Americans became bored with in the 80's.

Not particularly a proud moment for MIT.


> Racism is rarely overt, it is often insidious.

It is often overt, and is very common.

Propagandists seize on this human trait to build fear and hatred of the
other by selective focus and constant redefinition of "racism".

"Those people are out to get you, and I can save you from them!!"

The leftist rally cry that killed more people than any other ideology in
modern times.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 12:33:52 PM4/21/12
to
On Apr 21, 11:11 am, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <f719905d-5cd9-4e9b-bc03-1a7b9b48c...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
Al,

Just answer this question: Was the expression "Tar baby" by Michelle
Bachmann appropriate?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html

Explain the following:

How come we can call George Bush "a chimp", but we cannot call Obama
the same?

-Ramon The Capitalist + Free Marketeer

Al

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 2:00:14 PM4/21/12
to
In article
<ad8124b2-9279-4bc6...@n22g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
Because people like you who think they set the standards for language usage
will cling to this diversionary tactic to advance the blue model while
trying to deflect from the fact that it's unsustainable and failing?

People are entitled to their prejudices in a free country. Latinos, blacks,
Asians, all free to personally discriminate, which they all do.

It's in your interests that only one group is singled out.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 2:13:59 PM4/21/12
to
On Apr 21, 1:00 pm, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <ad8124b2-9279-4bc6-a860-79b3783a9...@n22g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
"People like me"??

Let me put it in uppercase, perhaps you can understand now:

I BELIEVE IN CAPITALISM, I HATE COMMUNISM, IF I COULD KILL HUGO CHAVEZ
(in a military situation, just to be safe) I WOULD NOT HESITATE FOR A
SECOND. I SUPPORTED (still do) THE WARS.

It is "people like you" who are simpletons, see the world in black and
white.

Again: Was the "tar baby" comment appropriate? Had you been running
for office (against an African American), would you make that comment?

-Ramon
Proud Member of the US Chamber of Commerce (regular and Hispanic)
So quit calling me commie, will ya'?
100% Supporter of the position on immigration being
lobbied and led by The US Chamber of Commerce
-------------------------------------------------------------

Ayatollah Santorum

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 2:52:26 PM4/21/12
to
On 4/21/2012 1:13 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:

>
> > Because people like you
>
> "People like me"??
>
Tards use those references all the time - "those people" with a nod
and a wink .. those *black* people, those *brown* people, those
*woman* .. and the minions simply nod in agreement.

After practicing it for 40 years , Georgian racist, The Serial
Adulterer, is a master at it . The Frothy Mixture of Anal
Leakage not so much - he, like this Tea Bagger , haven't quite mastered
the skill of talking about Americans who they consider not
being worthy of being one, still get caught.

This is why *these* people need eliminated from office.


--
---
Loon Party leader:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9b/Neanderthaler_Fund.png

Al

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 3:06:18 PM4/21/12
to
In article
<db3050c4-8a0d-4d99...@v1g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

> On Apr 21, 1:00 pm, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article

> > > Explain the following:
> >
> > > How come we can call George Bush "a chimp", but we cannot call Obama
> > > the same?
> >
>
> > Because people like you
>
> "People like me"??

Yes, people who edit context from statements to avoid addressing them...



> I BELIEVE IN CAPITALISM


... to deflect and divert from the points raised and questions asked...



> I HATE COMMUNISM


... In order to give a speech of bona fides and declarations...



> It is "people like you" who are simpletons, see the world in black and
> white.


... to justify and legitimize a stern lecture and to speechify about the
failures of classesand castes you've categorized for us.

Which is all fine and well, but if you're gonna just dodge the points I make
to get on a creaky old leftist soapbox, take that ancient game on the road.

The trouble is, Ramon, your claims and your rhetoric don't add up, no matter
what flag you fly.

When I counter your logic to show it, you erase it.


> Again: Was the "tar baby" comment appropriate? Had you been running
> for office (against an African American), would you make that comment?

I might, to make a point that thee term is associated with blacks by racists
and racialist hustlers.

It means a sticky, difficult situation, because tar is sticky, not because
it's black.

The people vested in racism by nature need to find it everywhere, like a
gold miner seeks gold.

You're the New McCarthys, and you alone get to define what constitutes
"racism", how sweet a deal is that, for fascists?

Tracey12

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 3:37:29 PM4/21/12
to

George Kerby

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 3:48:04 PM4/21/12
to



On 4/20/12 2:58 PM, in article
2868f74f-b53b-403e...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, "Ramon F
Herrera" <gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote:

> On Apr 20, 12:33 pm, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>
>>>> So it should be exceptionally easy for you to name a few
>>>> KKKers that switched parties around 1964.
>>
>>>> Mike Smith
>>
>>> Mike,
>>
>>> Once again, I dare you people to find ONE CASE in which the Democratic
>>> party is linked to the KKK and/or Neo-Nazis.
>>
>>> Disclaimer: YES, WE ALL KNOW THE PAST, please stay on this side of the
>>> last HALF CENTURY. Robert Byrd recanted and is DEAD.
>>
>>> Keep in mind that the folks working on a time machine (the wet dream
>>> of all far rigthies) have found really serious OBSTACLES. They have
>>> doubts that it will ever be done.
>>
>>> The fact is that the Democrats and Republicans have switched sides,
>>> respect to RACISM. Abraham Lincoln would NEVER be a Republican today.
>>
>>> The Nazis -Neo or Paleo- are far RIGHT, you would have to be blind
>>> (genuine or pretend) to deny it.
>>
>>> -Ramon
>>
>
>> You cannot even name a single KKKer that switched from democrat
>> to republican? Is this just another libtard urban legend?
>> Of course it is.
>>
>> Mike Smith
>
> Strom Thurmond.
>
> Let's check with the Georgia Encyclopedia.
>
> "Many white voters who initially cast Dixiecrat ballots gravitated
> back toward the Democratic Party only grudgingly, and they remained
> nominal Democrats at best. Ultimately, the Dixiecrat movement paved
> the way for the rise of the modern Republican Party in the South. Many
> former Dixiecrat supporters eventually became Republicans, as was
> highlighted by Strom Thurmond's conversion in the 1960s. "
>
> http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-1366
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond
>
> -Ramon the Racist

Did your MIT professors ever inform you that *anyone* can submit almost
*anything* to Wikipedia, Einstein?

George Kerby

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 3:54:18 PM4/21/12
to



On 4/20/12 5:15 PM, in article otn3p796ken6gqbe2...@4ax.com,
"First. Post" <OccupiersDu...@invalid.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:36 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/20/12 11:36 AM, in article
>> 6bd3a712-7a4c-454d...@2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com, "Ramon F.
>> Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 20, 9:17 am, First. Post <OccupiersDumberThanD...@invalid.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:09:49 -0500, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:27:26 -0400, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
>>>>> <PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:45:43 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Ann Coulter
>>>>>>> Negroes with guns
>>>>>>> by Ann Coulter
>>>>>>> 04/18/2012
>>>>
>>>>>>> Liberals have leapt on the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Florida
>>>>>>> to push for the repeal of "stand your ground" laws and to demand
>>>>>>> tighter gun control. (MSNBC'S Karen Finney blamed "the same people who
>>>>>>> stymied gun regulation at every point.")
>>>>
>>>>>>> This would be like demanding more funding for the General Services
>>>>>>> Administration after seeing how its employees blew taxpayer money on a
>>>>>>> party weekend in Las Vegas.
>>>>
>>>>>>> We don't know the facts yet, but let's assume the conclusion MSNBC is
>>>>>>> leaping to is accurate: George Zimmerman stalked a small black child
>>>>>>> and murdered him in cold blood, just because he was black.
>>>>
>>>>>>> If that were true, every black person in America should get a gun and
>>>>>>> join the National Rifle Association, America's oldest and most august
>>>>>>> civil rights organization.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Apparently this has occurred to no one because our excellent public
>>>>>>> education system ensures that no American under the age of 60 has the
>>>>>>> slightest notion of this country's history.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Gun control laws were originally promulgated by Democrats to keep guns
>>>>>>> out of the hands of blacks. This allowed the Democratic policy of
>>>>>>> slavery to proceed with fewer bumps and, after the Civil War, allowed
>>>>>>> the Democratic Ku Klux Klan to menace and murder black Americans with
>>>>>>> little resistance.
>>>>
>>>>>>> (Contrary to what illiterates believe, the KKK was an outgrowth of the
>>>>>>> Democratic Party, with overlapping membership rolls. The Klan was to
>>>>>>> the Democrats what the American Civil Liberties Union is today: Not
>>>>>>> every Democrat is an ACLU'er, but every ACLU'er is a Democrat. Same
>>>>>>> with the Klan.)
>>>>
>>>>>>> In 1640, the very first gun control law ever enacted on these shores
>>>>>>> was passed in Virginia. It provided that blacks -- even freemen --
>>>>>>> could not own guns.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Chief Justice Roger Taney's infamous opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford
>>>>>>> circularly argued that blacks could not be citizens because if they
>>>>>>> were citizens, they would have the right to own guns: "[I]t would give
>>>>>>> them the full liberty," he said, "to keep and carry arms wherever they
>>>>>>> went."
>>>>
>>>>>>> With logic like that, Republicans eventually had to fight a Civil War
>>>>>>> to get the Democrats to give up slavery.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Alas, they were Democrats, so they cheated.
>>>>
>>>>>>> After the war, Democratic legislatures enacted "Black Codes," denying
>>>>>>> black Americans the right of citizenship -- such as the rather crucial
>>>>>>> one of bearing arms -- while other Democrats (sometimes the same
>>>>>>> Democrats) founded the Ku Klux Klan.
>>>>
>>>>>>> For more than a hundred years, Republicans have aggressively supported
>>>>>>> arming blacks, so they could defend themselves against Democrats.
>>>>
>>>>>>> The original draft of the Anti-Klan Act of 1871 -- passed at the
>>>>>>> urging of Republican president Ulysses S. Grant -- made it a federal
>>>>>>> felony to "deprive any citizen of the United States of any arms or
>>>>>>> weapons he may have in his house or possession for the defense of his
>>>>>>> person, family, or property." This section was deleted from the final
>>>>>>> bill only because it was deemed both beyond Congress' authority and
>>>>>>> superfluous, inasmuch as the rights of citizenship included the right
>>>>>>> to bear arms.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Under authority of the Anti-Klan Act, President Grant deployed the
>>>>>>> U.S. military to destroy the Klan, and pretty nearly completed the
>>>>>>> job.
>>>>
>>>>>>> But the Klan had a few resurgences in the early and mid-20th century.
>>>>>>> Curiously, wherever the Klan became a political force, gun control
>>>>>>> laws would suddenly appear on the books.
>>>>
>>>>>>> This will give you an idea of how gun control laws worked. Following
>>>>>>> the firebombing of his house in 1956, Dr. Martin Luther King, who was,
>>>>>>> among other things, a Christian minister, applied for a gun permit,
>>>>>>> but the Alabama authorities found him unsuitable. A decade later, he
>>>>>>> won a Nobel Peace Prize.
>>>>
>>>>>>> How's that "may issue" gun permit policy working for you?
>>>>
>>>>>>> The NRA opposed these discretionary gun permit laws and proceeded to
>>>>>>> grant NRA charters to blacks who sought to defend themselves from Klan
>>>>>>> violence -- including the great civil rights hero Robert F. Williams.
>>>>
>>>>>>> A World War II Marine veteran, Williams returned home to Monroe, N.C.,
>>>>>>> to find the Klan riding high -- beating, lynching and murdering blacks
>>>>>>> at will. No one would join the NAACP for fear of Klan reprisals.
>>>>>>> Williams became president of the local chapter and increased
>>>>>>> membership from six to more than 200.
>>>>
>>>>>>> But it was not until he got a charter from the NRA in 1957 and founded
>>>>>>> the Black Armed Guard that the Klan got their comeuppance in Monroe.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Williams' repeated thwarting of violent Klan attacks is described in
>>>>>>> his stirring book, "Negroes With Guns." In one crucial battle, the
>>>>>>> Klan sieged the home of a black physician and his wife, but Williams
>>>>>>> and his Black Armed Guard stood sentry and repelled the larger,
>>>>>>> cowardly force. And that was the end of it.
>>>>
>>>>>>> As the Klan found out, it's not so much fun when the rabbit's got the
>>>>>>> gun.
>>>>
>>>>>>> The NRA's proud history of fighting the Klan has been airbrushed out
>>>>>>> of the record by those who were complicit with the KKK, Jim Crow and
>>>>>>> racial terror, to wit: the Democrats.
>>>>
>>>>>>> In the preface to "Negroes With Guns," Williams writes: "I have
>>>>>>> asserted the right of Negroes to meet the violence of the Ku Klux Klan
>>>>>>> by armed self-defense -- and have acted on it. It has always been an
>>>>>>> accepted right of Americans, as the history of our Western states
>>>>>>> proves, that where the law is unable, or unwilling, to enforce order,
>>>>>>> the citizens can, and must act in self-defense against lawless
>>>>>>> violence."
>>>>
>>>>>>> Contrary to MSNBC hosts, I do not believe the shooting in Florida is
>>>>>>> evidence of a resurgent KKK. But wherever the truth lies in that case,
>>>>>>> gun control is always a scheme of the powerful to deprive the
>>>>>>> powerless of the right to self-defense.
>>>>
>>>>>> Ann Coulter conveniently ignores one central fact that is inconvenient
>>>>>> to her case.
>>>>
>>>>>> And that fact is:  HISTORY DID NOT STOP IN 1964.
>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it is true that the Klan was important to JIM CROW SOUTHERN
>>>>>> DEMOCRATS in their efforts to keep blacks under control after
>>>>>> Emancipation.
>>>>
>>>>>> What Coulter does not mention, and what every other rightwinger
>>>>>> refuses to recognize is the simple fact that after LBJ pushed through
>>>>>> the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, SOUTHERN JIM CROW DEMOCRATS
>>>>>> DESERTED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND BECAME SOUTHERN JIM CROW
>>>>>> REPUBLICANS.
>>>>
>>>>> So it should be exceptionally easy for you to name a few KKKers that
>>>>> switched parties around 1964.
>>>>
>>>>> Mike Smith
>>>>
>>>> Are they still trying to preach that load of bullshit?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.black-and-right.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/
>>>>
>>>> Not to mention the fact that the democrats have ALWAYS had a pathetic
>>>> record
>>>> on
>>>> civil rights:
>>>>
>>>>     October 13, 1858
>>>>     During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL)
>>>> states:
>>>> łI do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my
>>>> brother, or any kin to me whatever˛; Douglas became Democratic Partyąs 1860
>>>> presidential nominee
>>>>
>>>>     April 16, 1862
>>>>     President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of
>>>> Columbia;
>>>> in
>>>> Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no
>>>>
>>>>     July 17, 1862
>>>>     Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes
>>>> Confiscation
>>>> Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy łshall be forever free˛
>>>>
>>>>     January 31, 1865
>>>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous
>>>> Republican support, intense Democrat opposition
>>>>
>>>>     April 8, 1865
>>>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100%
>>>> Republican
>>>> support, 63% Democrat opposition
>>>>
>>>>     November 22, 1865
>>>>     Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting
>>>> łblack
>>>> codes,˛ which institutionalized racial discrimination
>>>>
>>>>     February 5, 1866
>>>>     U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully
>>>> opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement ł40 acres and a
>>>> mule˛
>>>> relief by distributing land to former slaves
>>>>
>>>>     April 9, 1866
>>>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnsonąs veto; Civil
>>>> Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans,
>>>> becomes law
>>>>
>>>>     May 10, 1866
>>>>     U.S. House passes Republicansą 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>>>> and
>>>> equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no
>>>>
>>>>     June 8, 1866
>>>>     U.S. Senate passes Republicansą 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>>>> and
>>>> equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes
>>>> and
>>>> 100% of Democrats vote no.
>>>>
>>>>     January 8, 1867
>>>>     Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnsonąs veto of law
>>>> granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.
>>>>
>>>>     July 19, 1867
>>>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnsonąs veto
>>>> of
>>>> legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I wish all problems were this trivially easy to solve...
>>>
>>> If you want to avoid racism from Democrats, here is an infallible way:
>>> Should you find yourself in a time machine, whatever you do, DO NOT
>>> DIAL THE KNOB to the 1800s!! In fact, STAY AWAY FROM any year before
>>> 1965!!!
>>
>> Ramon the Racist again, snips a post in an attempt to make him look
>> intelligent.
>>
>> Again, it doesn't work...
>
> Ramon obvioulsy believes that when he snips passages in order to create his
> own
> lies that it deletes that part of a post from all previous posts as well.
> Could
> the guy show himself to be any more of an idiot?
>

Ask his MIT profs. They passed him on to the World.

Amazing what comes out of Cambridge! I have a half-brother who got a PhD
there in the 50s and he is just as full of it as Ramon.

Al

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 5:03:57 PM4/21/12
to
In article <4f9301ed$0$2801$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net>,
Ayatollah Santorum <a...@asasa.com> wrote:

> On 4/21/2012 1:13 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
> >
> > > Because people like you
> >
> > "People like me"??
> >
> Tards use those references all the time - "those people" with a nod
> and a wink .. those *black* people, those *brown* people, those
> *woman* .. and the minions simply nod in agreement.


Unfortunately for your enthusiastic narrative, such was not the case in my
response.

Which is why the Señor edited it out, so that the narrative you and
propaganda you people disseminate could proceed unencumbered by small
considerations like logic, fact, and history. The left's three worst enemies.

First. Post

unread,
Apr 21, 2012, 7:01:52 PM4/21/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:54:18 -0500, George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com>
>>>>> ³I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my
>>>>> brother, or any kin to me whatever²; Douglas became Democratic Party¹s 1860
>>>>> presidential nominee
>>>>>
>>>>>     April 16, 1862
>>>>>     President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of
>>>>> Columbia;
>>>>> in
>>>>> Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no
>>>>>
>>>>>     July 17, 1862
>>>>>     Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes
>>>>> Confiscation
>>>>> Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy ³shall be forever free²
>>>>>
>>>>>     January 31, 1865
>>>>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous
>>>>> Republican support, intense Democrat opposition
>>>>>
>>>>>     April 8, 1865
>>>>>     13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100%
>>>>> Republican
>>>>> support, 63% Democrat opposition
>>>>>
>>>>>     November 22, 1865
>>>>>     Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting
>>>>> ³black
>>>>> codes,² which institutionalized racial discrimination
>>>>>
>>>>>     February 5, 1866
>>>>>     U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully
>>>>> opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement ³40 acres and a
>>>>> mule²
>>>>> relief by distributing land to former slaves
>>>>>
>>>>>     April 9, 1866
>>>>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson¹s veto; Civil
>>>>> Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans,
>>>>> becomes law
>>>>>
>>>>>     May 10, 1866
>>>>>     U.S. House passes Republicans¹ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>>>>> and
>>>>> equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no
>>>>>
>>>>>     June 8, 1866
>>>>>     U.S. Senate passes Republicans¹ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process
>>>>> and
>>>>> equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes
>>>>> and
>>>>> 100% of Democrats vote no.
>>>>>
>>>>>     January 8, 1867
>>>>>     Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson¹s veto of law
>>>>> granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.
>>>>>
>>>>>     July 19, 1867
>>>>>     Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson¹s veto
>>>>> of
>>>>> legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wish all problems were this trivially easy to solve...
>>>>
>>>> If you want to avoid racism from Democrats, here is an infallible way:
>>>> Should you find yourself in a time machine, whatever you do, DO NOT
>>>> DIAL THE KNOB to the 1800s!! In fact, STAY AWAY FROM any year before
>>>> 1965!!!
>>>
>>> Ramon the Racist again, snips a post in an attempt to make him look
>>> intelligent.
>>>
>>> Again, it doesn't work...
>>
>> Ramon obvioulsy believes that when he snips passages in order to create his
>> own
>> lies that it deletes that part of a post from all previous posts as well.
>> Could
>> the guy show himself to be any more of an idiot?
>>
>
>Ask his MIT profs. They passed him on to the World.
>
>Amazing what comes out of Cambridge! I have a half-brother who got a PhD
>there in the 50s and he is just as full of it as Ramon.

Who'd a thought that political rehetoric and propaganda are considered to be
"technology"?

FoxP2 Squared

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 12:42:27 AM4/22/12
to
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> scribblednews:fc493d97-46df-4569-891b-
f7141e...@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:

>
> The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> hypocrites...
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>
> Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
> are intellectually honest.
>
> -Ramon
>

Why, thank YOU!

The masked Moo rawder

Silen...@hotmail.com

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 4:06:50 AM4/22/12
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:10:49 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com>
wrote:

>Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> In 1988, Duke switched party affiliation from Democrat to Republican,
>> where he was promptly elected to the Louisiana House of
>> Representatives.
>
>He was still nothing but sheet for brains.

You mean "Republican sheet for brains.".


Silen...@hotmail.com

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 4:09:52 AM4/22/12
to
Are you saying that overt segregationist Strom Thurmond, who led an 83
day filibuster of civil rights legislation, -didn't- switch parties
from Democrat to Republican?

Do tell, rightard.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.




Silen...@hotmail.com

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 4:23:22 AM4/22/12
to
Correction: Thrumond's filibuster was 24 hrs and 18 min. The 83 day
figure comes from another matter I was researching at the time of this
post.

duke

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 8:38:33 AM4/22/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
wrote:

>On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
>> >hypocrites...
>>
>> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>>
>> >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
>> >are intellectually honest.
>>
>
> > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.

>Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
>have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
>subtext.

What does linguistics at MIT have to do with tar babies?

>Racism is rarely overt, it is often insidious.
>Too bad you don't understand the maxim about Caesar's wife.

I fully understand that tarbaby openly professes that only whites can be
racists.

>Incidentally: Are you sure you want to take this discussion into the
>realm of languages? I don't think it is wise. How many do you know?

My case is made.

>-Ramon

duke

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 8:39:35 AM4/22/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:46:06 +0000 (UTC), gaz...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny
McCormack) wrote:

>In article <f719905d-5cd9-4e9b...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
>Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>...
>>Incidentally: Are you sure you want to take this discussion into the
>>realm of languages? I don't think it is wise. How many do you know?
>
>If Duke limited himself to going into problem spaces in which he could
>handle himself and not get slaughtered, he wouldn't even be able to have a
>conversation with himself.

Gosh, and to think I have yet to be slaughtered. But you're welcome to try
after taking a ass whipping from me so often.

duke

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 8:40:12 AM4/22/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:11:06 -0500, Al <albert.f...@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article
><f719905d-5cd9-4e9b...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
> "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera"
>> > <ra...@conexus.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
>> > >hypocrites...
>> >
>> > >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>> >
>> > >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
>> > >are intellectually honest.
>> >
>>
>> > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.
>>
>> Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
>> have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
>> subtext.
>
>In most discussions here, you seem to employ this vaunted skill to pump out
>classic leftists class-war and racially-based transparent propaganda in a
>style most Americans became bored with in the 80's.
>
>Not particularly a proud moment for MIT.

I suspect MIT wants to forget about him.

duke

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 8:46:07 AM4/22/12
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:13:59 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
Yep, people like you.

>Let me put it in uppercase, perhaps you can understand now:

>I BELIEVE IN CAPITALISM, I HATE COMMUNISM, IF I COULD KILL HUGO CHAVEZ
>(in a military situation, just to be safe) I WOULD NOT HESITATE FOR A
>SECOND. I SUPPORTED (still do) THE WARS.

Sounds like you're pounding your chest in a silly way - "a military situation"?
Wanting to be special but just vanilla.

>It is "people like you" who are simpletons, see the world in black and
>white.

>Again: Was the "tar baby" comment appropriate? Had you been running
>for office (against an African American), would you make that comment?

Answer this: if a tar baby calls himself a tar baby, is it racist?

Alan Ferris

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 9:50:24 AM4/22/12
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:39:35 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>>If Duke limited himself to going into problem spaces in which he could
>>handle himself and not get slaughtered, he wouldn't even be able to have a
>>conversation with himself.
>
>Gosh, and to think I have yet to be slaughtered. But you're welcome to try
>after taking a ass whipping from me so often.

Even a child could take Earl. He is so fat he cannot move without
assistance:

Duke (Earl J Weber):
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385182548&sk=info

"Likewise a person who, by excesses in eating and drinking, would have
greatly impaired his health, or unfitted himself for duties for the
performance of which he has a grave obligation, would be justly
chargeable with mortal sin"
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06590a.htm

St. Paul said that "their god is the belly " (Phil 3:19)

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 10:37:47 AM4/22/12
to
On Apr 22, 7:38 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> >> >hypocrites...
>
> >> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>
> >> >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
> >> >are intellectually honest.
>
> > > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.
> >Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
> >have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
> >subtext.
>

> What does linguistics at MIT have to do with tar babies?

Linguistics is the science that studies languages (both machine and
human), their syntax, semantics and MEANING.

De nada,

-Ramon

Al

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 11:05:20 AM4/22/12
to
In article
<4f660ba4-9fdb-45a6...@g38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

> On Apr 22, 7:38 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> > <ra...@conexus.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> > >> <ra...@conexus.net>
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > >> >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> > >> >hypocrites...
> >
> > >> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
> >
> > >> >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
> > >> >are intellectually honest.
> >
> > > > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.
> > >Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
> > >have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
> > >subtext.
> >
>
> > What does linguistics at MIT have to do with tar babies?
>
> Linguistics is the science that studies languages (both machine and
> human), their syntax, semantics and MEANING.
>


One needs this education if one is to assign the meanings to people's words
they don't intend, in keeping with the leftist view that one's
interpretation of meaning trumps the author's intended meaning.

IOW, as with your mentor Noam, it's another way to bullshit.

First. Post

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 11:19:01 AM4/22/12
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:09:52 -0400, Silen...@hotmail.com wrote:

You're the real lying sal of dogshit aroiund here dumbfuck.
Did Al Gore Sr. switch parties or remain a lifelong racist democrat?
Did Senator Ernest Hollings switch parties or did he remain a lifelong racist
democrat?
Did J. William Fulbright switch parties or remain a lifelong racisr democrat?
Did Sam Ervin switch parties or remain a lifelong racist democrat?
And what about the rest of the democratic opponenets of the civil rights act?
How many switched parties and how many remained life long racist democrats?
http://gopcapitalist.tripod.com/democratrecord.html

How many of the Republican promoters of the civil rights act switched to the
democrat party since you claim the race roles were reversed you lying sack of
dogshit?

Keep beating your little two name list of odd balls Duke and Thurmond while
dozens of hatefilled bigoted democratic congressmen and governers remained loyal
to their racist roots until their dying day.
Makes you look more "Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid" than anyone else posting
here you ignorant racist fuck. You're the ones that keep preaching to the rest
of the world that no minority can accomplish a goddamned thing without the help
of their betters, the democrats. Sp even today you look down your noses at
those that you pretend to want to help even though your "great society" has not
done a fucking thing in nearly 50 years other than waste trillions of dollars on
gov't giveaways ion order to buy votes.
As LBJ said “I'll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years."
When did LBJ switch parties liar?

You rank right in their with Zepp Jamieson and Gary Rozelles you ignorant lying
sack of shit.
Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid not so silent Otto has spouted his historical
untruths once again.





"Apparently, I'm supposed to be more outraged by what Mitt Romney does with his money than by what Barack Obama does with mine."

First. Post

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 11:28:22 AM4/22/12
to
So if ALL the racist democrats switched parties then why is it you only keep
pissing out the same TWO names over and over as proof of your lies dickhead?

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid not so silent Otto trying to preach his
historical untruths again.

linuxgal

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 3:39:49 PM4/22/12
to
duke wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:46:06 +0000 (UTC), gaz...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny
> McCormack) wrote:
>
>> In article <f719905d-5cd9-4e9b...@r32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
>> Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>> ...
>>> Incidentally: Are you sure you want to take this discussion into the
>>> realm of languages? I don't think it is wise. How many do you know?
>> If Duke limited himself to going into problem spaces in which he could
>> handle himself and not get slaughtered, he wouldn't even be able to have a
>> conversation with himself.
>
> Gosh, and to think I have yet to be slaughtered.

You get slaughtered on Sacred Scripture every time you hit send.

Paul Duca

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 8:47:46 PM4/22/12
to
On Apr 21, 5:03 pm, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <4f9301ed$0$2801$bbae4...@news.suddenlink.net>,
> considerations like logic, fact, and history. The right's three best friends to manipulate.

N. Lashanda Grover

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 6:05:16 PM4/22/12
to
Known as SilentNigger. Flint, MI. After numerous beatings for lying
SilenMonkey went crazy, became malicious. He calmed down after he was
given a banana. He is also almost certainly a registered sex
offender. He was caught trying (and failed) to crash the The DemocRAT
Hall Of Shame website http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

Today he is mostly a frightened usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they
have been exposed, frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo
monkey who sits in the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying
nothing of value. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


Nobody believes a lying lazy history-rewriting under-educated nigger
Democrat...

================================
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/7908297d4acaaf4d/07437c14be260041?#07437c14be260041
Or: http://tinyurl.com/c3sx47

You tried to claim that Democrats funded the Iraq War because
Bush wouldn't withdraw troops if Democrats defunded the Iraq War, and
you tried to base your claim on the Democrat's defunding of Vietnam
under Nixon and the resulting Vietnam soldier deaths.

YOU LIED repeatedly.

American Vietnam War-Related Deaths by War Years and Post-War:
http://www.militaryfactory.com/vietnam/casualties.asp

Lyndon B. Johnson
November 22, 1963 – January 20, 1969
1964 206
1965 1,863
1966 6,143
1967 11,153
1968 16,592
Total: 35,957

Richard Nixon
January 20, 1969 – August 9, 1974
1969 11,616
1970 6,081
1971 2,357
1972 641
1973 168
1974 (178) 89
Total: 20,952
Vietnam Total: 58,193
Johnson: 62%
Nixon: 36%

62% of Vietnam War deaths were under DEMOCRAT President Johnson funded
by Democrats.

You lied.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Then you tried to claim Democrats didn't defund the Vietnam War.

You lied.

"In December 1970, Congress reacted to the U.S. invasion of Cambodia
by passing the landmark Cooper-Church amendment to the Foreign
Military Sales Bill. The amendment, named for and sponsored by Sens.
John Sherman Cooper (R-Kentucky) and Frank Church (D-Idaho),
prohibited the use of any funds already appropriated for military
spending on the introduction of additional U.S. troops into Cambodia."
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/congendswar.htm

You lied.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Then you tried to pretend that Johnson's Presidency didn't even matter
to Democrats!

Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/9ae65ed51e39188d/e3a3db2dcb21e6c7?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=George+Romney+in+trial+matchups#e3a3db2dcb21e6c7
Or: http://tinyurl.com/c8pdtv

You said: "Johnson... didn't seek another term as president."

YOU LIED.

"He ran about even with Republican George Romney in trial matchups
that spring."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson#Presidency_1963.E2.80.931969

Yes, Johnson DID "seek another term as president" but got his ass
handed to him.

Only THEN did he QUIT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

================================

And you rewriting of history BEGAN when you tried to worship your
Savior and Master, Saddam:

Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/9865077a7c55664/fc00e733299b2461?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=Baathists+and+Saddam+and+forced+on+the+people#fc00e733299b2461

Or: http://tinyurl.com/cmoozz

You claimed "Iraq wrote a constitution in 1968 and it was adopted in
1970."

You LIED.

"A LEADING MEMBER of the revolutionary Ba'ath Party..., Saddam played
a KEY ROLE in the 1968 coup that brought the party to long-term power.
As VICE PRESIDENT under the ailing General Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr,
Saddam... [created] repressive security forces. In the early 1970s,
Saddam spearheaded Iraq's nationalization of the Western-owned Iraq
Petroleum Company, which had long held a monopoly on the country's
oil. Through the 1970s, Saddam cemented his authority over the
apparatuses of government as Iraq's economy grew at a rapid pace."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein

================================

And we're STILL WAITING for you to PROVE you're NOT A LAZY NIGGER:

Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/356dca4332b1f5a4/2c558450f6af514e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=silentotto+red+state+porn#2c558450f6af514e
Or: http://tinyurl.com/cw7apw

Tue, 3 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Wed, 4 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Thu, 5 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Fri, 6 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Sat, 7 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Sun, 8 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Mon, 9 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....
Tue, 10 Mar 2009
Still WAITING for YOU to do some WORK....

We're STILL WAITING for you to DISPROVE:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/b46e79c65733b7e4?hl=en

Highlights:
- 60% of the most perveted states are Blue States.
- Of the ten least perverted states Blue states are STILL the most
perverted.
- Democrats are SIX TIMES more perverted than normal conservative
Americans.

We're still waiting....

<crickets...>

================================

And it ALL began:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 17, 10:24 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> There isn't enough land on the planet for windmills to power us, there
>> isn't enough land or roof space on the planet for solar to power us,
>> and there isn't enough land on the planet to grow whatever biofuel
>> source can be dreamed up to power us.
>Germany...
>Small, cloudy Germany...
>Is slated to get 25% of their power from solar by 2020.
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/04/AR2007050402466.html

You said: "Germany... is slated to get 25% of their power from solar
by 2020."

Your cite says: "For now, the technology remains expensive and barely
registers as a fraction of total energy production -- less than 0.5
percent. The government hopes to increase that figure to 3 percent by
2020."

YOU have been CAUGHT LYING.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

================================

Nobody believes a lying lazy history-rewriting under-educated nigger
Democrat...

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

X. Billy Sebastian

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 6:05:46 PM4/22/12
to
Known as SilentNigger. Flint, MI. After numerous beatings for lying
SilenMonkey went crazy, became malicious. He calmed down after he was
given a banana. He is also almost certainly a registered sex
offender. He was caught trying (and failed) to crash the The DemocRAT
Hall Of Shame website http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

Today he is mostly a frightened usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they
have been exposed, frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo
monkey who sits in the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying
nothing of value. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:41:04 -0800 (PST), SilentOtto
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 6, 4:27 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:16:08 -0800 (PST), tvaerska...@aol.com wrote:
>> >On 6 Mar, 22:48, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:19:09 GMT, Svenne <tvaerska...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> >You would be more at home in a police state than a really free
>> >> >society.
>> >> Don't you have Soviet Cock & Balls to be washing?
>> >It's you American Patriots who are going to be licking police state
>> >cock and balls.
>> Finland: Conquered TWICE by the Soviets.
>> America: NEVER conquered by ANYBODY, EVER.
>The CSA, which included Florida, was conquered by the USA in 1865

Wrong. The CSA was not a foreign country.

You LIED.

Wrong. The CSA was not a sovereign country.

You LIED.

"The United States of America ("The Union") held secession illegal and
refused recognition of the Confederacy. ...no European nation
officially recognized the CSA as an independent country."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_States_of_America

Wrong. The CSA was not conquered.

You LIED.

"The CSA effectively collapsed when Generals Robert E. Lee and Joseph
E. Johnston surrendered their armies in April 1865."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_States_of_America

Wrong. Florida was not conquered.

You LIED.

During the War of Northern Aggression, the ENTIRE UNION ARMY tried to
sack Florida so we took a little time off from fishing and fucking
your daughters to KICK YOUR ASS. The ENTIRE UNION ARMY could ONLY
MANAGE a DRAW:

October 9, 1861, Santa Rosa Island: Union victory.
June 30-July 1, 1862, Tampa: Confederate victory.
October 1-3, 1862, St. John's Bluff: Union victory.
October 16-18, 1863, Fort Brooke: Union victory.
February 20, 1864, Olustee / Ocean Pond: Confederate victory.
March 6, 1865, Natural Bridge: Confederate victory.
http://americancivilwar.com/statepic/florida.html

>You had hostile Yankee boots marching on your Confederate soil and
>stomping Confederate ass and there wasn't a goddamned thing you could
>do about it.

See above, nigger.

We consider ALL "Yankees" to be "hostile" but we'll let you come to
Florida to give us your money IF you don't bring your niggers with
you.

No, you didn't stomp Confederate ass, you ONLY managed a DRAW.

Yes, we DID do something about it. We DROVE you and your niggers out
of the State.

>Maybe it's in your family history.

As you can see above MY family history includes VICTORY at preventing
the War of Northern Nigger Aggression from capturing the PROUD State
of Florida.

YOU tried. YOU failed.

WE ran you off. Run, nigger. Run!

Tell us about YOUR nigger ancestors. Maybe my ancestors OWNED your
ancestors and I should add you to my family tree as one-off nigger
step-relatives? Sort of like a branch offshoot of monkey-nigger
evolution on the Patriot Games Family Tree of White Life.

Since EVERYBODY in my ancestry is 100% WHITE I'm guessing my WHITE
ancestors never fucked your Monkey ancestors, except maybe up their
monkey-crusty ass. Or, did they take their impure mixed-breed
nigglets with them when we RAN THEM OFF?

Is your soul still damaged by the WHITE SOUTHERN assfucking you got?

>How does it feel to be a conquered people

I have no idea, see above. Ask your nigger ancestors.

SilentOtto: Mammy!?
Mammy: What boy?

SilentOtto: Do we has relatives from Florda?
Mammy: Yes, boy, why?

SilentOtto: A cracker in da innernet said his great-great-grand-pappy
punked my sestors.
Mammy: Your what!?

SilentOtto: Ansters, ansistors! What I said!
Mammy: What ju mean punked?

SilentOtto: yknow... In the back, and like dat...
Mammy: BOY! Do you mean fucked up the ass!?

SilentOtto: Dat's what da cracker said Mammy!
Mammy: You dumbass, we don't talk about it anymore!

SilentOtto: Why Mammy! WHY! Is it true!?
Mammy: Of course its true, you dumbass!

SilentOtto: OOH! Lordylordylordylordy...
Mammy: Stop whining, boy. They ain't comin' up North and we ain't
EVER going down South.

SilentOtto: Lordylordylordylordy...
Mammy: Eat your government cheese, boy.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA!!

Paul Duca

unread,
Apr 22, 2012, 8:51:49 PM4/22/12
to
On Apr 22, 11:28 am, First. Post <OccupiersDumberThanD...@invalid.net>
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:23:22 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 04:09:52 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >>On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:48:04 -0500, George Kerby
> >><ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>On 4/20/12 2:58 PM, in article
> >>>2868f74f-b53b-403e-a67e-b0604b5ea...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com, "Ramon F
First Post is too busy being more impressed with what Mitt Romney does
with his money, to the point of assuming he'll get the same if Mitt is
put in charge.

Paul

Paul

duke

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 7:44:31 AM4/23/12
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:37:47 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
wrote:

>On Apr 22, 7:38 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
>> >> >hypocrites...
>>
>> >> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>>
>> >> >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
>> >> >are intellectually honest.
>>
>> > > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.
>> >Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
>> >have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
>> >subtext.

> > What does linguistics at MIT have to do with tar babies?

>Linguistics is the science that studies languages (both machine and
>human), their syntax, semantics and MEANING.

Ah, now you're openly admitting that you didn't understand the tarbaby comment.

duke

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 7:45:09 AM4/23/12
to
I think ramon has a problem with that.

duke

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 7:46:55 AM4/23/12
to
Never have. Don't see why you would think that now. I'm a protest_ant's worst
nightmare - a Roman Catholic that knows scripture.

Alan Ferris

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 8:56:31 AM4/23/12
to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:46:55 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>>>>> Incidentally: Are you sure you want to take this discussion into the
>>>>> realm of languages? I don't think it is wise. How many do you know?
>>>> If Duke limited himself to going into problem spaces in which he could
>>>> handle himself and not get slaughtered, he wouldn't even be able to have a
>>>> conversation with himself.
>>>
>>> Gosh, and to think I have yet to be slaughtered.
>>
>>You get slaughtered on Sacred Scripture every time you hit send.
>
>Never have. Don't see why you would think that now. I'm a protest_ant's worst
>nightmare - a Roman Catholic that knows scripture.

ROFL, you have constantly shown you lack knowledge of scripture and it
is amazing how many people have corrected you.

Here is an example of your knowledge of scripture:

---------------
"Dummy, the Jews didn't have chickens then." - duke (Earl Webber)

Luke 13:34 "...as a hen gathers her brood under her wings..."
---------------
"And God said that no one has ever seen him." - duke (Earl Webber)

Exodus 24:10 "...and they saw the God of Israel; and under His feet
there appeared to be a pavement of sapphire...”
---------------
"no one had a job, so no money." - duke (Earl Webber)

Matthew 22:19 "Show me the coin used for paying the tax..."
---------------
"The only religion preceding Christianity was Judaism" - duke (Earl
Webber)

1 Kings 22:53 - For he served Baal, and worshipped him, and provoked
to anger the LORD God of Israel, according to all that his father had
done.
--------------

--
Ferrit

()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")

Paul Duca

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 10:26:25 AM4/23/12
to
On Apr 23, 7:44 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:37:47 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Apr 22, 7:38 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:14 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Apr 21, 7:04 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:05:00 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >The least you people could do is OWN TO IT, instead of being such
> >> >> >hypocrites...
>
> >> >> >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75351.html
>
> >> >> >Frankly, I have more respect for overt white racists. At least they
> >> >> >are intellectually honest.
>
> >> > > Too bad you didn't understand the "tar baby" comment.
> >> >Too bad you haven't taken the classes of Linguistics at MIT that I
> >> >have. Then we can add my knowledge of psychology and areas like
> >> >subtext.
> > > What does linguistics at MIT have to do with tar babies?
> >Linguistics is the science that studies languages (both machine and
> >human), their syntax, semantics and MEANING.
>
> Ah, now you're openly admitting that you didn't understand the tarbaby comment. Darkies LIKE being called that.

Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 10:32:16 AM4/23/12
to
On Apr 22, 9:50 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:39:35 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >>If Duke limited himself to going into problem spaces in which he could
> >>handle himself and not get slaughtered, he wouldn't even be able to have a
> >>conversation with himself.
>
> >Gosh, and to think I have yet to be slaughtered.  But you're welcome to try
> >after taking a ass whipping from me so often.
>
> Even a child could takeEarl.  He is so fat he cannot move without
> assistance:
>
> Duke (EarlJWeber):http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385182548&sk=info
>
>

I've seen...a fat old frat boy from a school better known for its
football teams than its scholarship--a standard template for the good
conservative Republican.

And he put his picture in too...THAT is someone who expects 20 year
olds to date him, much less be so sexually overwhelmed by him they
wind up with child?

Above all, the page is brand new...I guess he was told to set one up
so he can spread the good word about Catholicism and/or the GOP.


Paul

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages