JIMMY CAUGHT AGAIN
DGVREIMAN
Jimmy Caught Again
About every two weeks Jim McCulloch tries to get his flagrant and
obvious defamation and cons posted about me. Although he has been
proved a liar and a distorter dozens of times, he waits a few
days after his recent exposure as a liar and con man, and then he
just repeats the same old tired cons which have been exposed as
cons so many times he should be ashamed to continue to post such
obvious, idiotic transparent lies and utter distortions.
Here are past posts in which everything Jimmy is trying to lie
about has been exposed as false. Why does Jimmy hate me so much
that he is willing to clearly and unmistakably prove to all the
readers that he is a con man and a deceiver and distorts out of
context what other people post?
Probably because, as usual, Jimmy and is ilk cannot win a debate.
The reason they cannot win is their position on our war on
terrorism, and their pro-Saddam pro-traitor positions are not
only untenable, but specious. So Jimmy and is ilk are trying
their best to lie as much as they can to try and discredit me
with cyberstalking, lies, fabricated nonsense and distortions
that border on one of the most obvious con games I have ever seen
on the Internet.
Below are the exchanges between Jimmy and I that prove he is
lying. From now on when he posts his standard hype, lies and
libel, I will simply reply with this post.
Notice every time Jimmy provides any specifics to back up his
claims about me he proves to us all that he is lying. Anytime you
see people post diatribe and accusations about anyone, ask them
for specifics, they will either run and hide, or post them and
prove they have been lying all along.
> > "Jim McCulloch" <mccu...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message
> > news:BAB203C4.6DDB0%mccu...@mail.utexas.edu...
> >> OK, here's another one for you, Doug. You told us that
> > "Lieutenants and
> >> Captains are usually only in the Military for two or less
> > years." This is
> >> not a statement that someone (other than yourself, of
course)
> > who had
> >> actually been in the service would agree with. Care to
perform
> > your squid
> >> act with that one?
> >
> > Doug Says: Jimmy, this is easy, you are lying again. I said
> > nothing of the kind and you know it.>
> I quoted your exact words, Doug. Your old memory neurons are
tired today.
Doug Says: No you did not quote me in context Jimmy and my
memory neurons are just fine. I asked you to repost the post you
are referencing, in its entirety and in context. Further, stop
snipping out my replies and pretending like you did not read
them. You screwed up claiming my assignment was not adjacent to
both the Cambodian border and the Iron Triangle, and after I gave
you a Geography lesson, and parsed a sentence for you, I noticed
you snipped that out, tried to hide your embarrassment for being
so stupid, and now you are trying to use yet another self-serving
distortion of what I said to try and discredit me. What is going
to happen Jimmy is what usually happens. All your efforts to
deceive, lie and distort is going to backfire and make you look
like the deceiver and deception artist you are.
Further, the reason I asked about your employment was to
establish that you know absolutely nothing about the military.
I, on the other hand spent many years in the Military and there
is little I don't know about it in reference to the time I was
on active duty.
Here is what you tried to hide from my previous reply:
Doug Says: Now Jimmy you are lying outright. Repost what I said
specifically. I said my first assignment in Vietnam was in the
Iron triangle right on the Cambodian border if I remember
correctly. When you questioned that I said I was assigned to the
25th Infantry division, Tay Ninh city based camp, and Tay Ninh
province. Tay Ninh province is located close to BOTH the
Cambodian border and the Iron Triangle. The fact you did not
understand that my first assignment involved both general areas
simply means that you know absolutely nothing about military
assignments. An assignment in combat does not mean that you sit
in a single spot, no more than an assignment means than you are
placed on a static border and you must remain there.
What you are doing Jimmy is what you usually do. You are lying
and distorting, then trying to lie and ridicule your own pathetic
distortions.
>
> > Yet if you want to> > trade résumé's then you should provide
at least your place of
> > employment. Why are you hiding that information?
>
> Because you never asked me. Before retiring, I worked for the
University of
> Texas at Austin. UT Austin retirees can retain their email
addresses, if
> they wish, which is why I have a University of Texas email
address.
>
> OK, here's another one for you, Doug. You told us that
"Lieutenants and
> Captains are usually only in the Military for two or less
years." This is
> not a statement that someone (other than yourself, of course)
who had
> actually been in the service would agree with. Care to perform
your squid
> act with that one?
Doug Says: Jimmy, this is easy, you are lying again. I said
nothing of the kind and you know it. Reference the post Jimmy.
In context please, the entire post.
Lying and conning the readers with your own distorted
self-serving and goofy interpretations of what I say just makes
you look more deceptive than normal Jimmy, if that is possible.
Making the rank of Captain in only two years and only being in
the Army a maximum of two years before taking over a combat
platoon is not the same as saying "they only stay in the military
for a total of two years" Jimmy. Most Lieutenants have been in
the Army less than two years, and when I was in the Army a 2nd
Lieutenant made 1st Lieutenant in one year, and a 1st Lieutenant
made Captain (0-3) in two years. Therefore they typically have
two or less years in the military when they are assigned to a
combat platoon...that is why the Senior NCO's need to train them
or break them in.
Your stupidity in respect to the military, and your deceptive
nonsense in respect to the location of the Iron Triangle which
anyone can prove false simply by referencing any map of South
Vietnam, is clearly your style Jimmy. You lie, con, distort,
then try to ridicule your own distortions. All you manage to do
is do all that work, and then just make another pitiful fool
outof yourself each time.
I am sorry I had to be this brutal in this post Jimmy, normally I
just laugh at you and go on to the next post. But you seem to be
determined to make an ass out of yourself again just like you did
with your SDS bullshit, and your other idiotic false accusations
and child like whines.
Now Jimmy, if you want to reply, leave what I say in, and reply
to it. Stop distorting my replies or taking them out of context
and then try to ridicule your own distortions. I will also add
that your claim that I don't know how long officers stay in the
Army is exceptionally hilarious considering my military
background. I will also add to the above that Lieutenants and
Captains that are passed over for promotion usually get out of
the military when their first obligation for active duty is over.
Jimmy, the reason you are distorting my posts is well-known. You
have admitted to being a member of the Communist controlled and
financed SDS terrorist organization. You even said you were
proud to be a member of that organization although that
organization murdered Americans, hated all loyal Vietnam
Veterans, and even trained in Cuba to perform terrorist and
murderous acts on Americans and military targets. So we all know
your true agenda Jimmy, and why you are being so deceptive when
it comes to me and others that support our troops and did serve
during the Vietnam war.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
> Best regards,
>
> --Jim McCulloch
>
> =====================
> "I have killed the enemy with Guns, Knives, Claymore mines,
Grenades, Wire,
> Artillery and Air Attacks" --Doug "Credibility Is My Middle
Name" Grant von
> Reiman
>
Jim McCulloch
"Doug Says (2002-05-27 17:56:27 PST): Alec, where do you get this utter
nonsense? First, 99% of all combat soldiers in Vietnam were volunteers."
That happens to be untrue, of course, but more importantly, it is
_extremely_ hard to imagine how someone who ever went to Vietnam could
believe such a thing. It is very easy, however, to imagine a bar-stool hero
and all-round know-it-all believing it.
Best regards,
--Jim McCulloch
===============
"I have killed the enemy with Guns, Knives, Claymore mines, Grenades, Wire,
Artillery and Air Attacks" --Doug "Rambo" Grant von Reiman
DGVREIMAN
> One thing I forgot in listing Doug's military howlers, was the
following:
>
> "Doug Says (2002-05-27 17:56:27 PST): Alec, where do you get
this utter
> nonsense? First, 99% of all combat soldiers in Vietnam were
volunteers."
>
> That happens to be untrue, of course, but more importantly, it
is
> _extremely_ hard to imagine how someone who ever went to
Vietnam could
> believe such a thing. It is very easy, however, to imagine a
bar-stool hero
> and all-round know-it-all believing it.
Doug Says: Jimmy, we have all seen your idiotic claims about the
Vietnam war. But this is the doozy. In the US Army, draftees
typically were not sent into combat unless they were sent to
Vietnam with their entire units or they volunteered.
You just go from one lie to the next, and your challenges of what
I say about the military, considering you have never been in the
military, and never in Vietnam, and your claim that you proudly
served in the terrorist organization (SDS) that murdered
Americans and hated Vietnam vets is your entire basis for making
such incredible gaffs and false statements about the US
Military's role in Vietnam.
>
Doug Grant (Tm)
Jim McCulloch
DGVREIMAN at dgg...@worldnet.att.net wrote on 4/9/03 10:43 AM:
>
> "Jim McCulloch" <mccu...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote in message
> news:BAB8D28E.6FAB2%mccu...@mail.utexas.edu...
>> One thing I forgot in listing Doug's military howlers, was the
> following:
>>
>> "Doug Says (2002-05-27 17:56:27 PST): Alec, where do you get
> this utter
>> nonsense? First, 99% of all combat soldiers in Vietnam were
> volunteers."
>>
>> That happens to be untrue, of course, but more importantly, it
> is
>> _extremely_ hard to imagine how someone who ever went to
> Vietnam could
>> believe such a thing. It is very easy, however, to imagine a
> bar-stool hero
>> and all-round know-it-all believing it.
>
> Doug Says: Jimmy, we have all seen your idiotic claims about the
> Vietnam war. But this is the doozy.
Not my idiotic claim, Doug, yours. Allow me to quote your _exact_ words
again:
"First, 99% of all combat soldiers in Vietnam were volunteers."
That statement is yours, not mine, and that statement is false. Read my
lips, Doug. False.
You are now doing your squid routine, trying pathetically to redefine
volunteer to mean "draftee sent with his unit". That's not what "volunteer"
means in English, as opposed to Dougese. (Not to mention the nonsense about
how all the draftees rotated in were "volunteers".)
DGVREIMAN
Doug Says: It is not Flase Jimmy, not at least as applied to the
US Army, of which I was referencing.
>
> You are now doing your squid routine, trying pathetically to
redefine
> volunteer to mean "draftee sent with his unit". That's not what
"volunteer"
> means in English, as opposed to Dougese. (Not to mention the
nonsense about
> how all the draftees rotated in were "volunteers".)
Doug Says: Jimmy, you have been caught red-handed distorting and
lying about what I said, and then trying to ridicule your own
distortions so many times you should be ashamed to even think
about trying it again. I said what I said Jimmy, I am not
changing anything, and your self-serving, iditioc and compeltely
erronerous distortions of what I say means little to me or anyone
outside of your assylum. You snipped out what I said above, and
now you are replying, once again, to your own pathetic
distortion.
Now here is what I said from the previous post that you snipped
out as we can all see from your snipping above:
Doug Says: Jimmy, we have all seen your idiotic claims about the
Vietnam war. But this is the doozy. In the US Army, draftees
typically were not sent into combat unless they were sent to
Vietnam with their entire units or they volunteered.
You just go from one lie to the next, and your challenges of what
I say about the military, considering you have never been in the
military, and never in Vietnam, and your claim that you proudly
served in the terrorist organization (SDS) that murdered
Americans and hated Vietnam vets is your entire basis for making
such incredible gaffs and false statements about the US
Military's role in Vietnam."
Further, being sent to Vietnam to be a cook is not a "combat
soldier" Jimmy.
Whew! You just keep making a complete fool out of yourself with
all these weird claims Jimmy. Now if you want to claim I was not
in Vietnam (25th Infantry Division, Tay Ninh Province, which is
close to both the Cambodian Border and the Iron Triangle, or
claim I was not in Korea (7th Infantry Division) then simply take
my $10,000 to $1000 challenge Jimmy. That is easy money if you
are not lying, but we all know you are Jimmy. So either put up
or shut up Jimmy, the moment of truth has arrived.
Doug Grant (Tm)