Isn't it funny that google doesn't support posting to
alt.politics.obama...What are they afraid of?
>... afraid ...
Of course you are: your masters command you to fear.
>... America haters.
You hate Americans because they don't want
to suffer and die for your satanic idols, bushfilth.
No, it was founded by LIBERTARIANS, which is not the same thing at all.
Individual liberty and limited government is a recurring theme in the
Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the
writings of the Founders.
Liberalism, however, is not about individual liberty at all, it is about
socialist statism - a big government nanny-state that treats people like
domesticated animals, much like a farmer cares for a herd of cattle.
As a reaction to conservative religious values, liberalism may sometimes
be permissive, usually regarding sexual matters, but permissiveness is
not the same as freedom, and in all other matters liberalism is really
quite authoritarian. Since human beings are nothing more than
domesticated animals, they are not permitted to make their own choices,
at least not when it comes to anything important. Dogs are not allowed
to choose what they eat, they eat the bowl of kibble their loving master
gives them, and nothing else.
Liberals don't really even have a good record on protecting sexual
freedom. The 19th and early 20th-century liberal movements were
characterized by support for birth control, eugenics, and forced
sterilization of 'defective' people. Once again, humans are treated
like dogs or cattle, not even allowed to reproduce without their
masters' permission, and only with mates chosen for them based on the
quality of their breeding.
It should also be noted that it was liberals who were behind the
Temperance movement that led to Prohibition. The Temperance movement
was characterized by an unlikely alliance of socialist atheists and
conservative religionists, who in spite of all their other differences
had one thing in common - the desire to tell other people what to do.
The Founders had none of these things in mind when they declared
independence and wrote the Constitution. They would be absolutely
appalled at the idea of an all-powerful government treating people like
dogs, breeding them like cattle, telling them what to eat and drink, and
micromanaging their personal lives.
>...No one on Usenet ...
You're the same in real 'life', no doubt.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:17:25 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... afraid ...
Of course you are: your masters command you to fear.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:47:17 -0800, Frito Pendejo <fr...@pendejo.com> wrote:
>On 2010-04-18 04:09, * US * wrote:
>> The bushfilth isn't on the same side as America,
>> which was founded by liberals.
>
>No, it was founded by LIBERTARIANS...
In 1971?
'Libertarian' refers to a philosophy, not just the name of a minor
political party. The first recorded use of the term dates back to 1789.
The terms 'libertarian' and 'liberal' seem to have a common root,
'liber' or 'free.' 'Classical' liberalism was a reaction to the
oppressive institutions of the time, monarchies and organized religion.
These institutions were the 'conservatives,' since they wished to
conserve the existing social structure. By questioning conservative
authority and challenging the institutions of power, classical liberals
would have been seen as anarchists, much like the libertarians of today.
Somewhere along the way, however, liberalism lost its philosophical
bearings, and its former ideals of individual liberty and limited
government gave way to collectivism and statism. This is the
'liberalism' we know today, which is actually 'conservative' by the
traditional definition, since it now controls the institutions of power,
and will do anything it takes to conserve that power.
Evidence of the role-reversal can be seen in the way the 'conservative'
Republicans wish to dismantle the institutions created by 'liberal'
Democrats (e.g. Social Security, national health care). By challenging
the existing power structure, the Republicans have become the new
liberals, while the Democrats have become the conservative monarchs
fighting to defend their thrones.
Because the definition of 'liberal' has been perverted to mean the exact
opposite of what it originally meant, the term 'libertarian' has become
the most common term to describe the philosophy of individual freedom
and limited government.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:41:44 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>...moronic...trash ... shitty ... loser ...
At least you're consistent.
>...The first recorded use of the term dates back to 1789.
So they were too little too late even then.
Were they the ones who wanted Washington to be king?
Did you even attempt to read the link?
>... shitty ...
You sure are desperate for attention, too.
Can't you click on a link, much less read one?
>Boy ...
Try to avoid your urge to attack children, bushfilth.
>... it doesn't take much to brainwash
>a weak mind ...
You believed the one about the yellowcake from Niger, no less.
The bushkultie teabaggy doesn't like it when his
Messiah Glenn Beck is described factually.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:47:29 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
The teabaggy's gullible.
The bushkultie teabaggy doesn't like it when his
Messiah Glenn Beck is described factually.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:47:29 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
The teabaggy's gullible.
The bushkultie teabaggy doesn't like it when his
Messiah Glenn Beck is described factually.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:47:29 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... shitty ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/exposing-glenn-beck-as-a_b_537491.html
>... afraid ...
Continue cowering.
Conservatives want medieval-style serfdom
to a monarchy of corporate elites.
The becked-up loser hates Americans
for their freedom of expression.
The teabaggy's gullible.
The bushkultie teabaggy doesn't like it when his
Messiah Glenn Beck is described factually.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:47:29 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... shitty ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/exposing-glenn-beck-as-a_b_537491.html
>... afraid ...
Continue cowering.
The becked-up loser hates Americans
for their freedom of expression.
The teabaggy's gullible.
The bushkultie teabaggy doesn't like it when his
Messiah Glenn Beck is described factually.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:47:29 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... shitty ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/exposing-glenn-beck-as-a_b_537491.html
>... afraid ...
Continue cowering.
Well said!
"* US *" wrote in message news:9keos55dhkt2pp7kr...@4ax.com...
Unfortunately. Is there a way we can make California a part of
France?? Or, detonate a few well placed MOAB's along the San Andreas
fault and let the state of fruits and nuts slide off into the sea.
Then why does only 19% of the American people call themselves
"Liberal"? Btw,how old are you?? Do you have a job and pay taxes? Do
you have a wife and family?? Do you think you pay too little in
taxes?? Do you want bigger government with far more intrusion into
your personal life?? Do you think you should be left alone and not
have goverment trying to control every aspect of your life?? Are you
for open borders?? Are you for downsizing the military and using that
money saved to expand government entitlement programs? Do you think
gas should be $7+ a gallon?
http://www.idiocentrism.com/liberals.htm
Hating liberals is hating Americans.
America is for liberals.
Conservatives want medieval-style serfdom
to a monarchy of corporate elites.
The becked-up loser hates Americans
for their freedom of expression.
The teabaggy's gullible.
The bushkultie teabaggy doesn't like it when his
Messiah Glenn Beck is described factually.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:47:29 -0700 (PDT), Anonymous Idiot - the anti-ethical farting ass
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>... shitty ...
You sure are desperate for attention, too.
Can't you click on a link, much less read one?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/exposing-glenn-beck-as-a_b_537491.html
http://mises.org/etexts/classical.asp
Hating liberals is hating Americans.
America is for liberals.
>Hating liberals is hating Americans.
Libs aren't Americans.
>America is for liberals.
Hell is for Libs.
C'mahn, ya xposting shill-boi! Who you workin' for?
Nobody is /this/ dumb by accident! %)
--
*=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
*=( For all your UK news needs.
"Anonymous Infidel - the anti-political talking head"
<messi...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1264221a-a77e-481b...@t14g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> What America does or doesn't do is none of your business. [Go back to
> your shitty groups and stay the fuck out of alt.politics.faggot
Is that where you do most of your postings? Everyone knows you very well
there I bet
You're not one of these frauds are you? <snicker>
>
> Everyone knows you very well there I bet
Shouldn't you be off telling people what a great idiot-in-chief bambi
is? Correcting everyone on how Obama is going to gain seats and not
lose them. <snicker>
>Responding to Buster Norris:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:39:09 -0400, * US * wrote:
>>
>>>Hating liberals is hating Americans.
>>
>> Libs aren't Americans.
>>
>>>America is for liberals.
>>
>> Hell is for Libs.
>
>
>
>C'mahn, ya xposting shill-boi! Who you workin' for?
I'm self-employed, so I can afford a real news service not some German
free service for shithead lamers .
>Nobody is /this/ dumb by accident! %)
Good point, so you think your Kraut mommy bashed your head on the
floor on purpose?
Oh, you complained like a crying faggot about xposting then DID NOT
trim out the newsgroups..........................
Damn, you sure is a dumbass.................................!!!
>...conservatives...
You have no idea what that word means, either.
HA!
>Hell is ...
It's just another lie you knelt and swallowed, weakling.
Hating liberals is hating Americans.
America is for liberals.
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:34:48 +0000 (UTC), Mike Jones
> <lu...@dasteem.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Responding to Buster Norris:
>>
>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:39:09 -0400, * US * wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hating liberals is hating Americans.
>>>
>>> Libs aren't Americans.
>>>
>>>>America is for liberals.
>>>
>>> Hell is for Libs.
>>
>>
>>
>>C'mahn, ya xposting shill-boi! Who you workin' for?
>
> I'm self-employed, so I can afford a real news service not some German
> free service for shithead lamers .
>
>>Nobody is /this/ dumb by accident! %)
>
> Good point, so you think your Kraut mommy bashed your head on the floor
> on purpose?
>
> Oh, you complained like a crying faggot about xposting then DID NOT trim
> out the newsgroups..........................
>
> Damn, you sure is a dumbass.................................!!!
Ok. The blindingly obvious, explained, just for you. (Sigh!)
* Self employed still means working for somebody or something.
* Paying when you don't have to doesn't make you "smart".
* Assuming nationality based on usenet provider ??? WTF?
* Comments (not "complaints") were about /you/ posting /at all/
* xposting not trimmed, so you make an ass of yourself across all.
Keep going. You're slightly more amusing than TV. ;)
Liars are Exposed:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:21:11 -0500, "ArmyOfLIARS"
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Get lost" <rande...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3769de99-98aa-4f36...@e6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>> Thanks to Patriot Games for bringing this to my attention. The queers
>> should have been exterminated in the early 1980's when people realized
>> what they were doing.
>My neighbors 26 year old daughter has AIDS. She was infected through a blood
>transfusion. You think she should be killed?
"It's important to remember that HIV was not a health problem until
the 1980's when the virus was identified. Subsequently, a test was
developed to screen for it. Since 1985, all donated blood has been
screened for HIV. The highest risk for people receiving blood was from
1975 to 1985."
http://www.uihealthcare.com/topics/hivinfectionsaids/hivi4614.html
Are you claiming she got a blood transfusion at LESS THAN ONE YEAR
OLD?