Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Explosives Found In World Trade Center Dust

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Möbius Pretzel

unread,
Sep 21, 2009, 11:44:00 AM9/21/09
to
Explosives Found In World Trade Center Dust

Whereas a cup of conventional thermite will melt a hole clear through
a cars engine block,the same quantity of nano-thermite will blow the
car apart.
While thermite is classed as an incendiary nano-thermite actually
detonates with a force and speed equivalent to TNT!

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html#reaction_rate

Al Dykes

unread,
Sep 21, 2009, 12:05:53 PM9/21/09
to
In article <04c7312e-3822-48bb...@b18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=F6bius_Pretzel?= <M0bius_r...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Explosives Found In World Trade Center Dust
>
>Whereas a cup of conventional thermite will melt a hole clear through
>a cars engine block,the same quantity of nano-thermite will blow the
>car apart.
>While thermite is classed as an incendiary nano-thermite actually
>detonates with a force and speed equivalent to TNT!

And it would go BOOM. Nobody heard BOOM at WTC consistent in timing,
loudness, and brisanse with man-made demolition.

>
>http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html#reaction_rate

Nobody found nano-thermite. They found "evidence of". There are many
sources of teh samle material. Paint would be one.


Here's what a real chemist says about the Herrir paper:


The aim of the experiment is to determine whether thermite of any
type was present.

The thermite reaction contains its own oxygen source.

The thermite reaction will proceed in an oxygen-free atmosphere.
Combustion will not.

Therefore, in order to distinguish between a thermite reaction and
combustion, calorimetry must be carried out in an oxygen-free
atmosphere.

The calorimetry carried out in the paper was in an
oxygen-containing atmosphere. Therefore, the calorimetry cannot be
taken as evidence of a thermite reaction.

For Harrit et al to claim that their results are evidence of a
thermite reaction, they appear to be assuming that any real
scientists reading their paper are, rather than are not,
stupid. Sadly for them, we aren't.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

0 new messages