> Hint #3: More 'RATs Registered & Voted Than Republicans

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 8:01:49 AM11/8/12

to

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/07/fox-news-exit-poll-summary/

> Hint #3: More 'RATs Registered & Voted Than Republicans - Muslim Communist Won...

Fox News exit poll summary: Obama's key groups made the difference
November 07, 2012

An examination of the exit polls sheds light on how a president facing
unemployment near 8 percent, debt topping $16 trillion and mounting
questions over the Libya terror attack was able to win a second term
in office.

Obama’s win Tuesday night came from a strong showing among core
Democratic constituencies, being more likeable than his opponent, and
an economy that voters felt is doing well-enough to give him another
four years. Also, the president’s response to Hurricane Sandy in the
final days of the campaign was an important factor to many voters.

Obama’s key groups made the difference -- both in their makeup of the
electorate and, for the most part, their strength of support for him.
Non-whites made up 28 percent of the electorate, up a bit from 27
percent in 2008. This group largely backed Obama: 71 percent of
Hispanics (it was 67 percent last time), and 93 percent of blacks
(down a touch from 95 percent).

Republican challenger Mitt Romney won among white voters by 20
percentage points. That’s up from John McCain’s edge of +12 points in
2008. In addition, the share of votes cast by whites was lower (72
percent) than it has been going back to at least 1992.

Click to read the exit polls.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2012-exit-poll?intcmp=related

Young voters were important to giving Obama his first term. Voters
under age 30 showed up again this time: They represented 19 percent
of all voters, one point higher than the 18 percent in 2008. Even so,
they didn’t back him as strongly this time: 60 percent -- down six
points.

National

Young Voters

Obama 60%

Romney 37%

Seniors backed Romney by 56-44 percent, mostly unchanged from 2008.

Meanwhile, more Democrats than Republicans voted, 38-32 percent. In
2008, Democrats also outnumbered Republicans by 39-32 percent.

Almost all Democrats supported the president (92 percent). That
support was equaled among Republicans for Romney (93 percent).

Forty-five percent of independents backed Obama, down from 52 percent
last time. Half of this swing group preferred Romney (49 percent).

Marital status was a more significant factor than gender this year.
Women, a traditional Democratic voting group, backed Obama by 11
points -- about the same as by 13 points in 2008. Even so, married
women backed Romney by 7 points (an improvement from McCain’s +3
showing).

Men backed Romney (52-45 percent), and married men backed him by an
even wider margin (60-38 percent).

Romney was successful in energizing his base: conservatives accounted
for 35 percent of all voters today, one-point higher than in 2008. And
he captured 82 percent of them (McCain got 78 percent). White
born-again Christians made up 26 percent of the voters today and 78
percent favored Romney (for McCain it was 74 percent).

In addition, white Catholics went for Romney by a margin of 59-40
percent. This is a group that has historically backed the winner.

About four voters in 10 say Obama’s response to Hurricane Sandy was
important to their vote (42 percent), and they backed the president by
a better than two-to-one margin. Fifteen percent said it was the
“most important” factor in their vote.

Mood of the Country

Obama’s victory comes despite voter dissatisfaction with how things
are going in the country, mediocre economic ratings and a majority
opposing his health care plan.

Less than half of voters think the country is headed in the right
direction (46 percent). Fifty-two percent say things are going in the
wrong direction. Still, that’s an improvement from the 75 percent who
thought so in 2008.

National

Direction of the Country

Right Direction 46%

Wrong Track 52%

For reference, when former President George W. Bush won re-election in
2004, it was 49 percent right direction and 46 percent wrong track.

Voters who said the country is on the right track went for Obama (93-6
percent), while those who said things are going in the wrong direction
went solidly for Romney (84-13 percent).

Overall, 23 percent rate the condition of the nation’s economy
positively (2 percent “excellent” and 21 percent “good”). That’s
three times as many as the 7 percent who rated it positively in 2008.

Fully 77 percent of voters gave a gloomier assessment (45 percent “not
so good” and 31 percent “poor”).

Almost all Republicans (96 percent) and most independents (80 percent)
gave the economy a thumbs-down, as did 58 percent of Democrats.

Voters are also divided over whether the economy is getting better or
worse (39-30 percent).

Obama benefited from more voters blaming Bush (53 percent) than him
(38 percent) for current economic conditions.

National

Blame For Current

Economic Problems

Obama 38%

Bush 53%

Twenty-five percent said they are better off today than four years ago
-- almost identical to the 24 percent who felt that way in 2008. More
-- 33 percent -- said they are worse off now. Another 41 percent say
there has been no change in their family’s financial situation.

Most of those saying they are better off today voted to re-elect the
president (84-15 percent). Those who are worse off sided with Romney
by 80-18 percent.

Results on the role of government favored Romney. Fifty-one percent
said they prefer smaller government with fewer services, while 43
percent prefer larger government.

These divided views translate into clear vote preferences: voters who
want the government to do less backed Romney by a whopping 50-point
margin, and those that want it to do more went for Obama by 65 points.

A 54-percent majority approves of President Obama’s job performance,
while 45 percent disapprove. Almost all of those who approve voted
for him today (89 percent), just as those that disapprove backed his
challenger (94 percent).

In addition, 19 percent of voters felt “angry” about the Obama
administration and 30 percent were “dissatisfied but not angry.” At
the other end of the spectrum 24 percent felt “satisfied, but not
enthusiastic,” and 25 percent felt “enthusiastic.”

On the Issues

There’s no doubt the economy is the top issue for voters -- here’s
what they say is the biggest economic problem they’re personally
facing. Voters saying unemployment is the biggest problem sided with
Romney. Those who say rising prices go to Obama.

National

Most Important Economic Issue

Unemployment 38%

Rising Prices 37%

Taxes 14%

Housing Market 8%

Romney had a one-point edge on doing a better job on the economy and
likewise on the federal budget deficit (+2).

More voters trust Obama than Romney to handle an international crisis
(+7 points) and think he would better handle Medicare (+8 points).

Nearly half of voters -- 49 percent -- think all or part of Obama’s
health care law should be repealed -- something Romney had said he
would do. Forty-four percent want to keep or expand the law.

A plurality agrees with Obama on what should happen with income tax
rates: 47 percent think taxes should increase only on income over
$250,000. Some 13 percent say taxes should increase on everyone,
while 35 percent don’t think anybody’s taxes should increase.

The Candidates

More voters like Obama: 53 percent have a favorable opinion of him,
while 47 percent have a positive view of Romney.

National

Opinion of Obama

Favorable 53%

Unfavorable 46

National

Opinion of Romney

Favorable 47%

Unfavorable 50%

And by 53-43 percent voters think Obama is “in touch” with people like
them.

National

In Touch With People Like You

Obama is 53%

Romney is 43%

People looking for empathy in a candidate mostly back Obama (81-18
percent). Those looking for a candidate who shares their values went
for Romney (55-42 percent), as did those who wanted someone with a
vision for the future (54-45 percent).

Finally, Obama successfully painted Romney as someone whose policies
would favor the rich -- 53 percent of voters thought that. Almost all
voters think Obama’s policies favor the middle class (44 percent) or
poor (31 percent).

COLORADO

President Obama won Colorado, a battleground state that he also won in
2008, with the help of Hispanics and independents.

Colorado has a large Hispanic population -- the state ranks sixth in
the United States. Hispanics gave the president more support than in
2008 when he received 61 percent to McCain’s 38 percent.

Colorado

Hispanics

Obama 74%

Romney 25%

White evangelicals also put their support behind the Republican
candidate. Colorado is home to James Dobson one of the most
influential spokesmen for the conservative movement and its social
positions behind the white evangelical movement in the United States.
In 2008, white evangelicals supported the Republican candidate John
McCain by 76 percent to Obama with 23 percent.

Colorado

Evangelicals

Obama 23%

Romney 74%

In 2008, independents in Colorado gave their support to Obama by 54 to
44 percent for Arizona Sen. John McCain. Tonight, that support
dropped significantly -- by 11 points -- and Mitt Romney won that
important group.

Colorado

Independents

Obama 43%

Romney 50%

Obama won with the support of Colorado’s voters who identified
themselves as moderates. But his support with this group was down
significantly from 2008. Obama won moderates in his first bid for the
White House 63 percent to 34 percent for Senator McCain.

Colorado

Moderates

Obama 50%

Romney 45%

FLORIDA

The race is tight in Florida and a winner had not been called as of
this writing. Unemployment and home foreclosure rates are high there,
but half the voters blame George W. Bush for current economic
problems.

Florida

Blame For Current

Economic Problems

Obama 42%

Bush 51%

Independents were 33 percent of the voters in Florida. They split 50
percent for Obama, 48 percent for Romney. In 2008, independents
favored Obama 52 percent to 45 percent, giving him a 7 percentage
point advantage.

Florida

Independents

Obama 50%

Romney 48%

Almost one-in-five (17%) Floridian voters is of Hispanic descent. But
in Florida there's a sizeable Cuban-American population -- distinct
from other parts of the country. They went slightly for Romney.

Florida

Cuban-American Voters

Obama 47%

Romney 50%

However Hispanics of non-Cuban descent went for Obama.

Florida

Non-Cuban Hispanic Voters

Obama 68%

Romney 32%

Obama did very well among blacks as well. Romney won among white
voters.

Florida

White voters

Obama 38%

Romney 61%

Florida has the highest percentage of seniors of all states. They were
almost one-quarter of all voters. They favored Romney by 16 percentage
points.

Florida

Seniors

Obama 42%

Romney 58%

IOWA

Obama started his presidential career winning the Iowa caucuses in
2008 and he ended his campaign there on Monday night. While Obama won
young voters in most states, here he did okay among seniors as well,
splitting them 50-50 with Romney.

Iowa

Seniors

Obama 50%

Romney 50%

More Iowans describe themselves as moderate than liberal or
conservative. Obama carried moderates easily.

Iowa

Moderates

Obama 63%

Romney 35%

Romney didn’t gain any votes with his position on abortion. A majority
of voters think abortion should be legal. Obama outscored Romney on
being better able to handle the economy, Medicare, energy policy and
being in touch.

OHIO

Since 2004, Ohio has flip-flopped in its support for the presidency
between the Republican and Democratic candidates. In 2008, Obama won
by five points. In 2004, Ohio voters supported the Republican
presidential candidate, George W. Bush, over Democrat John Kerry by
two percentage points. Tonight, Obama carried the state for the
second time.

Ohio voters are more likely to blame the country’s current economic
conditions on former President George W. Bush than Obama. Ohio has an
unemployment rate of seven percent, which is below the national
average of 7.8 percent. It also ranks 10th in foreclosures.

Ohio

Blame For Current

Economic Problems

Obama 40%

Bush 51%

Voters in union households increased their support for the president
by five points (it was 56-43 percent in 2008).

Ohio

Union Households

Obama 61%

Romney 37%

Almost six in 10 Ohio voters approved of the federal bailout of U.S.
automakers. Of those voters who approved of the bailout, 75 percent
supported Obama, while 24 percent went for Romney.

Ohio

U.S. Auto Bailout

Approve 59%

Disapprove 36%

Romney drew a great deal of his support from white men, winning that
group by 62-36 percent. In 2008, the Republican John McCain received
53 percent to 45 percent for Obama.

Ohio

White Men

Obama 36%

Romney 62%

VIRGINIA

In 2008, Obama was the first Democratic presidential candidate to win
Virginia in more than 40 years and tonight, he did it again.

Virginia has fared better than most states in the past four years,
with an unemployment rate at two percentage points below the national
average. Still, Virginia voters said the economy was their top
issue.

Virginia

Top Issue: Economy

Obama 47%

Romney 51%

Goode 1%

Voters who said the economy was the most important issue broke almost
evenly between the two candidates: 47 percent Obama to 51 percent Mitt
Romney -- and 1 percent for Virgil Goode, the Constitution Party
candidate.

Among college educated voters, Obama did well. He won that group in
2008, and this time with an increase in support of two percentage
points.

Virginia

College Graduates

Obama 53%

Romney 46%

Obama’s second win in Virginia was largely due to the support he
received from women and black voters.

Virginia

Women

Obama 54%

Romney 45%

Virginia

Black Voters

Obama 93%

Romney 6%

Independents in 2008 narrowly supported the president. This time they
broke for the Republican candidate.

Virginia

Independents

Obama 43%

Romney 53%

Veterans and active military split their support evenly between the
two candidates.

Virginia

Veterans and Active Military

Obama 49%

Romney 49%

WISCONSIN

Republican vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan is from Wisconsin.
Just over half there have a favorable opinion of him. That wasn't
enough to carry the ticket to victory in a state that last went
Republican in 1984.

Wisconsin

Opinion Of Paul Ryan

Favorable 52%

Unfavorable 43%

Women played an important role in the president’s victory in
Wisconsin. They favored him 57 percent to 42 percent for Romney.

Wisconsin

Women

Obama 57%

Romney 42%

Young voters were another strong group for Obama, splitting 59 percent
to 38 percent for Romney.

Wisconsin

Young voters

Obama 59%

Romney 38%

More than half the voters approved of the federal government’s aid to
U.S. automakers. Those voters strongly backed the president. Those who
disapprove of the auto bailout went for Romney just as strongly.

Wisconsin

U.S. Auto Bailout

Approve 53%

Disapprove 39%

Methodology

Edison Research conducted this exit poll for Fox News and interviewed
26,565 voters as they left randomly selected polling places around the
country.

--
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame©!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
10,000+ Buckwheat & DemocRAT Pics!
Over 10 Million Hits Since 2/10!

11/04/12: Galleries Updated!
Nearly 200 New OBAMA & 'RAT Cartoons Added!

FREE Windows® Gadgets!

Learn the TRUTH about: Bradley K Sherman, Bret Cahill, Dakota, David Johnston, Kevin Cunningham,
Kurt Lochner, Jay Herblock, Lamont Cranston, Lee Curtis, LiberalHere, Lookout, Lickin Ass' and
Fakin' Military Service, Lubow, Mitchel Holman, Ramon Herrera, Ray Fischer, Rightardia, RobW,
Roneal, Sanders Kaufman, ShittingDuck, Sid9, SilentOtto, Sir Gay, Tater Gumfries, Tim Crowley,
Tim Howard, Tom Sr, Tom Wheat

Sir Ray

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 10:38:29 AM11/8/12

to

Well, Patriot, ignoring your base premise since it is patently false
(President Obama is a Christian Centralist and he won the Presidency
of the United States this week, so a Muslim Communist DID NOT win
POTUS), the "Hint" portion in the title of your threads (so far three)
indeed seems to be a new angle, with the potential for some amusement
for many in this newsgroup.

Let's see what you cited:
On Nov 8, 8:01 am, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
http://www.democrathallofshame.com"

<patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com> wrote:
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/07/fox-news-exit-poll-summary/
> > Hint #3: More 'RATs Registered & Voted Than Republicans - Muslim Communist Won...
> Fox News exit poll summary: Obama's key groups made the difference
> November 07, 2012

<snip>

> Obama s win Tuesday night came from a strong showing among core
> Democratic constituencies, being more likeable than his opponent, and
> an economy that voters felt is doing well-enough to give him another
> four years. Also, the president's response to Hurricane Sandy in the
> final days of the campaign was an important factor to many voters.
> Obama s key groups made the difference -- both in their makeup of the
> electorate and, for the most part, their strength of support for him.
> Non-whites made up 28 percent of the electorate, up a bit from 27
> percent in 2008. This group largely backed Obama: 71 percent of
> Hispanics (it was 67 percent last time), and 93 percent of blacks
> (down a touch from 95 percent).

OK, so people who liked President Obama (or at least didn't like
Romney) turned out to vote for him, and people who liked Romney (or at
least didn't like Obama) turned out to vote for Mitt. And in the end
more people voted for President Obama in enough states, that Obama won
both the popular vote and the Electoral vote.
Fine, that seems pretty straightforward.

So, what bizarre Tea-Publican righty conspiracy are you pushing with
this "Hint" concept, Patriot, old boy? This should be good for a
laugh or two.

I Cecile Rountree

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 5:57:49 PM11/8/12

to

Sir Gay is an unidentified imposter (sock puppet) and scores 9.4 on
the Faggotry Meter. (Which strongly suggests he is a sock puppet of
Fwanklin Hummer, although others suggest he is a sock of Retardia or
Lickin' Ass.) Sir Gay is mostly a public imbecile, a proven liar and
an ultra-left butthurt faggot.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:24:13 -0800 (PST), Sir Gay
<waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>The poll was taken nearly a month ago, by a Republican Pollster:

Since "old" polls cause you to soil your panties here's a new poll:

Brown 49%
Warren 41%
Sunday, March 04, 2012
http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/03/scott_brown_leads_elizabeth_wa.html

>"The other is a private poll from Republican pollster Opinion
>Dynamics

Oops Caught lying...

Jennifer Mitchell-Jackson, Vice President
Ms. Mitchell-Jackson... ...received a master's degree in energy policy
from Cal-Berkeley... Prior to joining Opinion Dynamics, Ms.
Mitchell-Jackson worked for the California Public Utilities Commission
and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
http://www.opiniondynamics.com/aboutus/seniorstaff/

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

Sir Ray

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 9:43:16 PM11/8/12

to

Bizarre that Butt-boi would choose this as his Spam for this thread, but whatever:
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:57:49 PM UTC-8, I Cecile Rountree wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:24:13 -0800 (PST), Sir Ray

> <waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >The poll was taken nearly a month ago, by a Republican Pollster:
> Since "old" polls cause you to soil your panties here's a new poll:
> Brown 49%
> Warren 41%
> Sunday, March 04, 2012
> http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/03/scott_brown_leads_elizabeth_wa.html

Fine - here's an even newer "poll" for Flamer & Butt-Boi, and it's the only one that actually matters:

http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2012/general/mass-us-senate-election-results-2012.html
100% reporting

Elizabeth Warren (Dem) 54%
1,678,408 votes

Scott Brown (GOP) 46%
1,449,180 votes

Heh.

>>"The other is a private poll from Republican pollster Opinion Dynamics

From this thread (found via search):
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!searchin/alt.politics/The$20other$20is$20a$20private$20poll$20from$20Republican$20pollster$20Opinion/alt.politics/LGpbJhikalE/YvE_E8BGC48J

As can be seen from that thread, that was quoting a Daily Kos article (not linked, just cited)

"The other is a private poll from Republican pollster Opinion

Dynamics, which used to conducting polling for Fox News. This survey
was taken for Mass Insight, a self-described "market-driven solutions"
think tank, and it has Brown on top 52-43. Aside from the poll's
questionable provenance, it was also in the field a full month ago but
has only "leaked" out now

So, Patriot's response to that:

> Oops Caught lying...
> Jennifer Mitchell-Jackson, Vice President
> Ms. Mitchell-Jackson... ...received a master's degree in energy policy
> from Cal-Berkeley... Prior to joining Opinion Dynamics, Ms.
> Mitchell-Jackson worked for the California Public Utilities Commission
> and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
> http://www.opiniondynamics.com/aboutus/seniorstaff/

So Patriot just responded with some irrevelavant nonsense, unless he was claiming that Republican pollsters are too stupid to earn Master Degrees in energy policy and to work at Lawrence Berkeley National Labs - and if he's referring to hard-core TeaPublicans he's probably quite right.

So what else did I say in my post from March?
"Oops, Republican pollster + old poll + Brown's stumble on the Blunt
Amendment vote = Senator Warren in 2013."
Indeed.

Dusty N. Lohr

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 7:08:27 PM11/8/12

to

Sir Gay is an unidentified imposter (sock puppet) and scores 9.4 on
the Faggotry Meter. (Which strongly suggests he is a sock puppet of
Fwanklin Hummer, although others suggest he is a sock of Retardia or
Lickin' Ass.) Sir Gay is mostly a public imbecile, a proven liar and
an ultra-left butthurt faggot.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ray
<waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/dick-morris/215859-no-truth-to-...
>Dick Morris? You should have warned us at the beginning of your post
>so nobody would need to waste their time reading his fairy tales.

Oops! Caught lying...

BLS data for January is annotated with "Data affected by changes in
population controls" which is their terminology for guesstimates
between post-Christmas seasonal adjustment.

For example, when not seasonally adjusted the Unemployment Rate was
8.9 and probably dropped to 8.8 (rate of decline = -1.12%) in January.
Using Buckwheat Math the Unemployment Rate was 8.5 and dropped to 8.3
(rate of decline = -2.35%) in January.

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 10, 2012, 12:03:46 PM11/10/12

to

On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:38:29 -0800 (PST), Sir Ray
<waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Well, Patriot, ignoring your base premise since it is patently false
>(President Obama is a Christian Centralist

No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.

Has Buckwheat denounced Islam? No.

Instead, has Buckwheat gone anti-Christian? Yes.

The White House asked Georgetown to cover a monogram symbolizing
Jesus' name in Gaston Hall, which Obama used for his speech, according
to CNSNews.com. The gold "IHS" monogram inscribed on a pediment in the
hall was covered over by a piece of black-painted plywood, and
remained covered over the next day, CNSNews.com reported. The
Washington Times' Belief Blog asked the university about the
presidential request: Julie Bataille from the university's press
office e-mailed me that the White House had asked that all university
signage and symbols behind the stage in Gaston Hall be covered. "The
White House wanted a simple backdrop of flags and pipe and drape for
the speech, consistent with what they've done for other policy
speeches," she wrote. "Frankly, the pipe and drape wasn't high enough
by itself to fully cover the IHS and cross above the GU seal and it
seemed most respectful to have them covered so as not to be seen out
of context."
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/archive/Jesus-Missing-From-Obamas-Georgetown-Speech.html

Instead, has Buckwheat gone waay over the line defending Islam? Yes.

Actual quote from "The Audacity of Hope" [pg. 261]: Of course, not all
my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In
the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for
example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and
FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense
of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of
immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific
assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America
has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during
World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political
winds shift in an ugly direction.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obamas-dreams-of-my-father/

Obama Administration Pushes UN Resolution That Bans Criticism of
Islamic Radicalism
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/12/obama-administration-pushes-un-resolution-that-will-punish-americans-for-criticizing-islamic-violence/

Obama: ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of
Islam’
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/under-god/post/obama-the-future-must-not-belong-to-those-who-slander-the-prophet-of-islam/2012/09/26/acb9ab92-0810-11e2-a10c-fa5a255a9258_blog.html

In the interest of being accurate Buckwheat is NOT a traditional Arab
of even Indonesian Muslim (even though he was raised and trained as an
Indonesian Muslim). His 20+ years with Rev. Wright (a former Muslim)
altered his Indonesian Islamic faith toward Nation of Islam
(Farrakhan) then toward Black Nationalism including significant
anti-white and anti-colonial beliefs.

>so a Muslim Communist DID NOT win POTUS),

Wrong. Buckwheat is more of a Communist than anything else. Again,
in the interest of being accurate, most DemocRATs today are
"social-Communists," meaning an Americanized combination of classic
Socialism and classic Communism.

>Let's see what you cited:
>On Nov 8, 8:01 am, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>http://www.democrathallofshame.com"
><patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com> wrote:
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/07/fox-news-exit-poll-summary/
>> > Hint #3: More 'RATs Registered & Voted Than Republicans - Muslim Communist Won...
>> Fox News exit poll summary: Obama's key groups made the difference
>> November 07, 2012
><snip>
>> Obama s win Tuesday night came from a strong showing among core
>> Democratic constituencies, being more likeable than his opponent, and
>> an economy that voters felt is doing well-enough to give him another
>> four years. Also, the president's response to Hurricane Sandy in the
>> final days of the campaign was an important factor to many voters.
>> Obama s key groups made the difference -- both in their makeup of the
>> electorate and, for the most part, their strength of support for him.
>> Non-whites made up 28 percent of the electorate, up a bit from 27
>> percent in 2008. This group largely backed Obama: 71 percent of
>> Hispanics (it was 67 percent last time), and 93 percent of blacks
>> (down a touch from 95 percent).
>OK, so people who liked President Obama (or at least didn't like
>Romney) turned out to vote for him, and people who liked Romney (or at
>least didn't like Obama) turned out to vote for Mitt.

The first rule of simplifying is to NOT make it so simple that it
becomes completely stupid, irrelevant or wrong. You broke that 1st
rule...

There are 50 different observations from the 2008 election that could
have been factors and ALL of them are now irrelevant since the 2012
re-election. (For example: The 30-And-Under demographic has
traditionally registered to vote in high numbers and then voted in
quite low numbers but in 2008 they voted in quite HIGH numbers. Was
that a fluke? No, as we now know.)

Keeping it simple, here are the basic facts:

1) There are MORE registered DemocRATs than registered Republicans.

2) Registered DemocRAT voter turnout is HIGHER than registered
Republican voter turnout. (More registered Republicans have given
up...)

3) So-called Centrist or Independent voters are NOT centrist or
Independent, they mainly lean Left, support increased entitlements for
themselves and therefore support a Social-Communist agenda.

4) Demographics are going to dictate EVERYTHING for about the next 20
years:

a) 80 million Baby Boomers are going to die off. The Baby Boomers are
100% of the World War I, World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War
veterans.

b) The Baby Boomers are 100% of the so-called 'Reagan Democrats.'

c) The Baby Boomers were/are AT A MINIMUM fiscally conservative,
socially moderate (not liberal) and pro-military, pro-defense,
pro-gun, and pro-American Exceptionalism.

d) The Baby Boomers are being replaced by Social Communists who are AT
A MINIMUM atheists (if not anti-Christian), demand extensive
birthright entitlements, are anti-military, anti-defense, and
anti-American Exceptionalism (see Note #1). Something like 12,410,000
Baby Boomers are projected to die between now and the 2014 Midterm
elections...

e) Conservatism, as it exists today, from limp (GOP) to extreme
(so-called religious right) is unquestionably going EXTINCT and
NOTHING CAN SAVE IT. It could take most of the next 20 to 25 years of
the Baby Boomer die-off to see Conservatism become fully extinct but
on the national level it is ALREADY DEAD.

5) No amount of platform pandering can create a re-invented GOP that
can compete with the already proven-successful Social-Communist
DemocRATs. (See Note#2.)

6) Given the beating the limp GOP got, TWICE, any third party MORE
conservative than the limp GOP has NO CHANCE WHATSOEVER.

The above are FACTS.

My opinion is: IT'S OVER. America is FINISHED. The actual total
collapse (probably) won't happen overnight, but it is now GUARANTEED
to happen and there is NOTHING that can prevent it.

----------------------------------------

Note #1: Claiming that the Social-Communist DemocRATs are
anti-American Exceptionalism is both true and hilarious. We've seen
every version of Socialism and Communism fail over the last half a
century HOWEVER Social-Communist DemocRATs think THEY can come up with
a special and successful implementation... How could they possibly
think that if they didn't ALSO think THEY (Americans) were NOT MORE
exceptional than EVERYONE ELSE who has tried (and failed)???

Note #2: The most obvious question is something like: Is there any way
to "change" these failure-destined entitlement-dependent
Social-Communists? No, not realistically. Only something beyond
massive, such as a world war on the scale of WWII or larger could do
it and a world war in the 21st century means nuclear and that would
actually create MORE demand for gov't entitlements...

>So...

Thanks for the opportunity to shit in your open mouth in public,
again...

Jay Herblock

unread,

Nov 10, 2012, 12:33:08 PM11/10/12

to

On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
http://www.democrathallofshame.com"
<patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com> wrote:
Crap - like he always does.

Patriot Gums real name 'Darla'. Lives in a swamp shack outside
Jacksonville and raises pet gators.
Sells moon-pies and weapons to immigrant Cuban criminals. Saving up
for spiffy new Mussolini type uniform.
But gives real fascists a bad name.

Sir Ray

unread,

Nov 10, 2012, 3:20:19 PM11/10/12

to

Wow!
Patriot Flamer really has gone over the edge; I knew he was losing it when he started with the “State Run Media” nonsense (see "Patriot Flamer Note 1"), but he has entered a BroilJab and Phantom level of delusion with this meandering post.
His response is absolutely one target rich environment of right-wing insanity and delusions.

On Saturday, November 10, 2012 9:03:45 AM UTC-8, patrio...@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com wrote:
> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a

> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception –
Full on stale righty “Obama is a Muslim” nonsense, readily dismissed (Hell, Patriot’s own cite didn’t even support his case – e.g. “Julie Bataille from the university's press office e-mailed me that the White House had asked that ALL university signage and symbols behind the stage in Gaston Hall be covered”).

However, Patriot added a twist I haven’t heard of before:

> His 20+ years with Rev. Wright (a former Muslim)

Rev Wright was a former Muslim? Really? Well, let’s check his wiki entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright
“His parents are The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Sr. (1909–2001), a Baptist minister who pastored Grace Baptist Church in Germantown, Philadelphia, from 1938 to 1980,[8] and Dr. Mary Elizabeth Henderson Wright, a school teacher who was the first black person to teach an academic subject at Roosevelt Junior High.”
-- OK, no Islam there
“From 1959 to 1961, Wright attended Virginia Union University,[2] in Richmond and is a member of Omega Psi Phi fraternity, Zeta chapter. In 1961 Wright left college and joined the United States Marine Corps and became part of the 2nd Marine Division attaining the rank of private first class. In 1963, after two years of service, Wright joined the United States Navy and entered the Corpsman School at the Great Lakes Naval Training Center.[11][12] Wright was then trained as a cardiopulmonary technician at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Wright was assigned as part of the medical team charged with care of President Lyndon B. Johnson (see photo of Wright caring for Johnson after his 1966 surgery).
<snip>
In 1967 Wright enrolled at Howard University in Washington, D.C., where he earned a bachelor's degree in 1968 and a master's degree in English in 1969. He also earned a master's degree from the University of Chicago Divinity School”[11]
-- OK, no Islam there either
“Wright became pastor of the Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago on March 1, 1972; it had some 250 members on its rolls, but only about 90 or so were actually attending worship by that time”
--OK, Pastor of the Church of Christ at age, what 31? No islam there either.
So where does “Rev Wright was a Muslim” come from – it seems to stem from a 2007 New Republic blog article by Ryan Lizza - that has since been removed – conspiratorial!:
http://bobmccarty.com/2008/04/08/rev-wright-was-a-former-muslim-and-other-news/
“first appeared in an article written by Ryan Lizza, senior editor at The New Republic. Though it appeared in TNR’s blog, The Agitator, March 9, 2007, this link takes you to a site where the article in question was”
Yeah, I don’t think so…

> Wrong. Buckwheat is more of a Communist than anything else. Again,

> in the interest of being accurate, most Democrats today are

> "social-Communists," meaning an Americanized combination of classic
> Socialism and classic Communism.

Patriot Flamer and accuracy are mutually exclusive; for instance, The “Our Gang” character Buckwheat may well have been a Communist, but President Obama is quite the centralist (much to the dismay of many Progressives). He just looks leftist in comparison to the barking-mad bat-shit insane Tea-Publicans righties.
Now, this use of “Social-Communist”, hmm, might be a new meme that righties are trying to push, just like they did with IslamoFascists and such.
For Communists, well you’d want this link, Patriot old chap: http://www.cpusa.org/faq/

> The first rule of simplifying is to NOT make it so simple that it
> becomes completely stupid, irrelevant or wrong.

The reality is damn simple – enough people voted for Obama in enough states that he won both the Popular Vote and the Electoral College. Indeed, bets are being made that as the final vote counts are being certified across the country and President Obama’s vote percentage increases, will Romney’s popular vote total drop low enough to be rounded down to…47%! Huzzah!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/09/1159872/-HAHAHAHA-Romney-hits-47-9-in-the-popular-vote

> There are 50 different observations from the 2008 election that could
> have been factors and ALL of them are now irrelevant since the 2012 re-election

Here Patriot is trying to come off as Nate Silver, but ends up looking like Dean Chambers (or perhaps Dean Martin in his post-Rat Pack days)

> 1) There are MORE registered Democrat than registered Republicans.
Don’t tell Scotty Rasmussen that, for him party ID is the end-all-be-all:
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865566109/Rasmussen-poll-shows-Republican-identification-up-Democratic-identification-down-since-2008.html
In Oct. 2008, 33.3 percent of voters identified themselves as Republican, compared to 40.3 percent who identified themselves as Democrats. In 2012, according to the new Rasmussen data, 39.1 percent of voters now identify themselves as Republicans and 33.3 percent identify themselves as Democrats.

> 2) Registered Democrat voter turnout is HIGHER than registered

> Republican voter turnout. (More registered Republicans have given up...)

No way it could be the idiot crap candidates that the Republican party was running for office, could it? Also, note that Patriot wrote “REGISTERED DEMOCRAT[ic] Voter turnout” – maybe even he’s grasped the fact that VOTER FRAUD is near non-existentin in the US, while ELECTION FRAUD is what us Americans need to be worry about.

> 3) So-called Centrist or Independent voters are NOT centrist or
> Independent, they mainly lean Left, support increased entitlements for
> themselves and therefore support a Social-Communist agenda.

Patriot pushing the “Social-Communist” meme again, must be the new righty talking point.

> 4) Demographics are going to dictate EVERYTHING for about the next 20 years:

And this wasn’t true in past eras of America, like the large influx of various ethic immigrants over the decades starting, hell, the 1840s?

> a) 80 million Baby Boomers are going to die off. The Baby Boomers are
> 100% of the World War I, World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War veterans

The Baby Boomers are 100% of WWI & WWII & Korean Vets? What the hell does that mean? By definition, the Baby Boomer generation came after WWII ended, so none of them could have served in the World Wars (BTW, the last US WWI vet passed away in 2011, according to this wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_last_surviving_World_War_I_veterans_by_country), and the oldest of the Boomers would have been, what, 5-6 when the Korea War really started.

> b) The Baby Boomers are 100% of the so-called 'Reagan Democrats.'

Hmm, in 1980 the oldest Boomer would be about, what, 35? So nobody in their 40s or 50s at that time became a Reagan Democrat? Interesting revisionist history.

> c) The Baby Boomers were/are AT A MINIMUM fiscally conservative,
> socially moderate (not liberal) and pro-military, pro-defense,
> pro-gun, and pro-American Exceptionalism.

You know, President Obama was born in 1961 - that would put him at the very tail end of the Baby Boom generation – meaning he would be considered a BABY BOOMER.
So according to Patriot Flamer, President Obama is a fiscal conservative, he's not liberal, he's pro-military, he's pro-gun, and pro-American Exceptionalism. How about that!

> d) The Baby Boomers are being replaced by Social Communists

Yup, Patriot pushing this “Social Communists” nonsense big-time.

> e) Conservatism, as it exists today, from limp (GOP) to extreme
> (so-called religious right) is unquestionably going EXTINCT and
> NOTHING CAN SAVE IT. It could take most of the next 20 to 25 years of
> the Baby Boomer die-off to see Conservatism become fully extinct but
> on the national level it is ALREADY DEAD.

-->ALREADY DEAD<--
Your political beliefs are already dead.
The GOP - It’s dead, Jim.
The Old Southern Strategy was as dead as a door-nail.
With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do - Vote third party.
I see dead political beliefs
Dead Party walking
I voted GOP in Reno, just to watch it die.
YOU KILLED CONSERVATISM – YOU BASTARDS!
-- So, in the future, no-one will ever be conservative again? You sure about that, Partiot?

> 6) Given the beating the limp GOP got, TWICE, any third party MORE
> conservative than the limp GOP has NO CHANCE WHATSOEVER.

And thank God for that. BTW, Limp GOP, Patriot? Really now.

> The above are FACTS.
Nope, they are biased, bizarre WAGs and opinions of Patriot Flamer, and probably other wacked-out righties (including Butt-Boi Norris)

> My opinion is: IT'S OVER. America is FINISHED. The actual total
> collapse (probably) won't happen overnight, but it is now GUARANTEED
> to happen and there is NOTHING that can prevent it.

Good, does that mean you going to shut up and leave now, Patriot?

> Note #1: Claiming that the Social-Communist Democrats
Give it up with the retarded Social Communist crap, Patriot. Your butt-buddy ex-Rep Allen West who went around calling Democrats Communists has lost (although like a true Tea-partier, he is whining and crying and holding his breath about it – give it up dumb-ass Allen, you lost by a percentage well about the recount threshold so this isn’t a replay of Coleman vs. Franken for the MN Senate seat)
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Murphy-above-recount-range-no-West-concession-4026149.php

> Note #2: The most obvious question is something like: Is there any way
> to "change" these failure-destined entitlement-dependent
> Social-Communists? No, not realistically. Only something beyond
> massive, such as a world war on the scale of WWII or larger could do
> it and a world war in the 21st century means nuclear and that would
> actually create MORE demand for gov't entitlements...

Watching way too much “Revolution” on NBC nowadays, Patriot? Actually, maybe it was the new "Red Dawn", or reruns of "Jericho". Whatever Patriot, it's time to step away from the Dystopian Sci-Fi future literature...

Patriot Flamer Note #1: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/6f6dce0299d8bed3?pli=1
“DemocRAT's SHAME! State-Run Media Sensationalizing Trayvon 'Skittles' Martin Case”
State Run Media, Indeed - BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

unread,

Nov 10, 2012, 6:28:10 PM11/10/12

to

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:28:54 -0700 (PDT), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Like McCain, Romney has NOT once been ahead since Obama vs.Romney has
>been polled.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Gallup Tracking
8/21 - 8/27
Romney +1

ABC News/Wash Post
8/22 - 8/25
Romney +1

FOX News
8/19 - 8/21
Romney +1

Rasmussen Reports
8/8 - 8/10
Romney +2

Rasmussen Reports
7/29 - 7/31
Romney +3

CBS News/NY Times
7/11 - 7/16
Romney +1

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html#polls

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,

Nov 10, 2012, 7:12:44 PM11/10/12

to

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>http://www.democrathallofshame.com" wrote:
>> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
>> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
>> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.
>

>http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim-if-your-Father-is-a-Muslim
>
>Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
>
>As Salam Alaikum
>
>Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
>a Muslim.
>Its doesn't matter who your father was.
>

A blog?????? You tried to use a BLOG OPINION to prove
something???????????????

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why are you so fucking stupid?????????????

"Through the initial rituals at birth, the child is incorporated into
Islam............"
http://www.faqs.org/childhood/In-Ke/Islam.html

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 10:40:43 AM11/11/12

to

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:20:19 -0800 (PST), Sir Ray
<waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Saturday, November 10, 2012 9:03:45 AM UTC-8, patrio...@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com wrote:
>> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
>> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception –
>Full on stale righty “Obama is a Muslim” nonsense

The facts are what they are...

Buckwheat was born a Muslim, he was raised a Muslim, he transitioned
to Americanized Islam (Nation of Islam), and then transitioned to
Black Liberation theology...

>> Wrong. Buckwheat is more of a Communist than anything else. Again,
>> in the interest of being accurate, most Democrats today are
>> "social-Communists," meaning an Americanized combination of classic
>> Socialism and classic Communism.

>Now, this use of “Social-Communist”, hmm, might be a new meme that righties are trying to push, just like they did with IslamoFascists and such.

Any time a western-oriented person (Left or Right) is told they can't
do what they want to do they call it "fascist" and Islamic (Sharia)
Law provides THOUSANDS of things one is not permitted to do (or must
do under penaly of having a body part hacked off)...

It's not my fault you're stupid - "IslamoFascism" isn't a meme:

A meme is "an idea, behavior or style that spreads from person to
person within a culture." A meme acts as a unit for carrying cultural
ideas, symbols or practices, which can be transmitted from one mind to
another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals or other imitable
phenomena. Supporters of the concept regard memes as cultural
analogues to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate and respond to
selective pressures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme

"IslamoFascism" is a neologism - look it up...

"Social-Communist" isn't a meme that I know of any more than "Social
Democrat" is a meme - "Social Democrat" is the name the Socialists
GAVE THEMSELVES: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDUSA

"Social-Communist DemocRAT" is more accurate than "Social DemocRAT"
because aspects of basic Communism show up in "Social DemocRAT" plans
for America...

And I should also point out that defending and supporting Islam isn't
going to help you in the future. I realize that your Nazi-like
tendencies remind you of how the Nazis befriended the Muslims in WWII
against the Americans and our Allies HOWEVER, in the future, you will
either have to convert to Islam or you will be killed...

>> The first rule of simplifying is to NOT make it so simple that it
>> becomes completely stupid, irrelevant or wrong.

>> There are 50 different observations from the 2008 election that could
>> have been factors and ALL of them are now irrelevant since the 2012 re-election

>> 1) There are MORE registered Democrat than registered Republicans.

>> 2) Registered Democrat voter turnout is HIGHER than registered
>> Republican voter turnout. (More registered Republicans have given up...)
>No way it could be the idiot crap candidates that the Republican party was running for office, could it?

No, it couldn't, because Republican voter registration was less than
'RAT registration long before actual campaigning and primaries got
started....

>> 3) So-called Centrist or Independent voters are NOT centrist or
>> Independent, they mainly lean Left, support increased entitlements for
>> themselves and therefore support a Social-Communist agenda.

>> 4) Demographics are going to dictate EVERYTHING for about the next 20 years:
>And this wasn’t true in past eras of America, like the large influx of various ethic immigrants over the decades starting, hell, the 1840s?

No, it wasn't (they weren't), because those particular demographics
were not numerically significant (except maybe at the local level).
The Baby Boomer demographics (80,000,000) aren't even hugely
significant - they ARE the single most significant population
demographic human society HAS EVER EXPERIENCED. For the very first
time in recorded human history over 50% of a population will be 50
years old or older...

>> a) 80 million Baby Boomers are going to die off. The Baby Boomers are
>> 100% of the World War I, World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War veterans

>> b) The Baby Boomers are 100% of the so-called 'Reagan Democrats.'
>Hmm, in 1980 the oldest Boomer would be about, what, 35?
>So nobody in their 40s or 50s at that time became a Reagan Democrat?

Let me know when you figure out that "40s or 50s" is OLDER THAN "35."

>> c) The Baby Boomers were/are AT A MINIMUM fiscally conservative,
>> socially moderate (not liberal) and pro-military, pro-defense,
>> pro-gun, and pro-American Exceptionalism.

>> d) The Baby Boomers are being replaced by Social Communists

>> e) Conservatism, as it exists today, from limp (GOP) to extreme
>> (so-called religious right) is unquestionably going EXTINCT and
>> NOTHING CAN SAVE IT. It could take most of the next 20 to 25 years of
>> the Baby Boomer die-off to see Conservatism become fully extinct but
>> on the national level it is ALREADY DEAD.
>-->ALREADY DEAD<--
>Your political beliefs are already dead.

My political beliefs aren't dead, they are alive and well and I enjoy
them quite often.

>The GOP - It’s dead, Jim.

I already said that...

>only one thing you can do - Vote third party.

There isn't a niche for a viable third party EXCEPT in the form of a
moderate Socialist Party to compete with the extreme Social-Communist
DemocRATs...

>-- So, in the future, no-one will ever be conservative again? You sure about that, Partiot?

Like I said, it could take a few years...

>> 6) Given the beating the limp GOP got, TWICE, any third party MORE
>> conservative than the limp GOP has NO CHANCE WHATSOEVER.

>> The above are FACTS.

>> My opinion is: IT'S OVER. America is FINISHED. The actual total
>> collapse (probably) won't happen overnight, but it is now GUARANTEED
>> to happen and there is NOTHING that can prevent it.
>Good, does that mean you going to shut up and leave now, Patriot?

I'm having waay too much fun to leave anytime soon. Plus, I have
unfinished business I intend to complete.

And I do enjoy pointing at you Social-Communists and laughing at your
failures...

Anybody who follows any national sport is eventually confronted with a
championship (World Series, Super Bowl, etc.) where neither team is
your home team and you've never even been to either city or state. So
you aren't feeling so bad or so good for the loser or the winner - and
that's where I am with this. I'm slightly disappointed that the team
I rooted for lost but only just slightly because I didn't really
expect them to win anyway...

>> Note #2: The most obvious question is something like: Is there any way
>> to "change" these failure-destined entitlement-dependent
>> Social-Communists? No, not realistically. Only something beyond
>> massive, such as a world war on the scale of WWII or larger could do
>> it and a world war in the 21st century means nuclear and that would
>> actually create MORE demand for gov't entitlements...
>Watching way too much “Revolution” on NBC nowadays, Patriot?

Never heard of it...

>Actually, maybe it was the new "Red Dawn", or reruns of "Jericho".

Never heard of them...

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 11:39:01 AM11/11/12

to

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 10, 12:03�pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>http://www.democrathallofshame.com" wrote:
>> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. �In the Islamic world if your father is a
>> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
>> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.

>http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim-if-your-Father-is-a-Muslim
>Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
>As Salam Alaikum
>Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
>a Muslim.
>Its doesn't matter who your father was.

The best you could do is quote a blog...???

Very, very, characteristically pathetic of you...

At any rate, the above is TRUE. However, it is VERY INCOMPLETE...

Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam

>In any case, Obama's father didn't raise him to be a Muslim.

Oops! Caught lying...

His birth father (an African Muslim) gave him a traditional Muslim
name thus making him a Muslim according to Islamic Law. His Muslim
father DID raise him in Islam until his parents divorce.

>His mother raised him as a Christian.

Oops! Caught lying...

His mother divorced his African Muslim father and married an
Indonesian Muslim (another Muslim, two in a row, of course that's just
a coincidence, right?). Buckwheat was enrolled in an Indonesian
Catholic school where the choices of stated religion were: Muslim,
Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant. His mother selected "Muslim"
as his religion...

>But tell him that Obama's testament of belief in the trinity is
>grounds enough make him a Christian.

And that is TRUE yet INCOMPLETE...

Let's summarize: He was born a Muslim, his birth father named him
according to Islamic Law as a Muslim, his birth father intended for
him to be a Muslim and raised him as a Muslim until the divorce. His
mother married yet another Muslim, and enrolled him in school as a
Muslim...

Then (some years later) Buckwheat DENOUNCES Islam...

So, YES, that makes him NOT a Muslim and, according to his
DENOUNCEMENT, makes him a Christian - all true...

Except for ONE problem - as documented above the predominant worldwide
Islamic Law opinion is that the punishment for apostasy is
execution...

Has such a 'fatwa' been issued for Buckwheat??? Not that I've ever
heard of...

Which then gives us one OTHER problem - We KNOW he was born a Muslim,
we KNOW he was raised as a Muslim, we KNOW he was enrolled as a
Muslim, we KNOW he DENOUNCED Islam, and lastly we KNOW the predominant
world Islamic Law penalty for that is DEATH...

Why no death fatwa???

Because of this: Al-Takeyya. "The Islamic principle of lying for the
sake of Allah. Falsehoods told to prevent denigration of Islam, to
protect oneself, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned by
the Qur'an, including lying under penalty of perjury in testimony
before the United States Congress, lying or making distorted
statements to the media such as claiming that Islam is a religion of
peace..."

So now we KNOW he is STILL Muslim because no penalty has been issued
for his alleged conversion to Christianity because that alleged
conversion IS A LIE - a LIE SANCTIONED BY ISLAMIC LAW...

I'll bet your "husband" has some housework or other chores for you to
do so run along like a good little whatever-it-is-you-are and obey
your "husband."

Tom Swift Sr.

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 12:48:53 PM11/11/12

to

On Nov 10, 7:12 pm, "bustyourf...@rocketmail.com"
<bustyourf...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
> >On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com

> >http://www.democrathallofshame" wrote:
> >> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
> >> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
> >> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.

> --
> >http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim...

> >Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
>
> >As Salam Alaikum
> >Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
> >a Muslim.
> >Its doesn't matter who your father was.

> --

> A blog?????? You tried to use a BLOG OPINION to prove
> something???????????????

You fool, Bob Milby Jr.

Accurate information remains the truth, Bobby, no mattter where and in
what form it is. Reality is Reality.

Your paranoid delusions always collapse when they meet Reality

Deal with it, Junior.

But of course, you cannot because you are seriously *delusional*, Bob

Milby Jr., aka Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of

sockpuppets

-----
-----
Please Note:

In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka

Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of sockpuppets -- and the

winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.

We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,

psychotic interuption.
------
------

Sir Ray

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 2:03:10 PM11/11/12

to

Oh goody, I see Patriot has issued his rebuttal to my critique of his stinking load from yesterday. Of course, it really isn’t a rebuttal, more of complete whining and lying while repeating debunked talking points

On Sunday, November 11, 2012 7:40:41 AM UTC-8, patrio...@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com wrote:
> The facts are what they are...

And the facts are not on your side, Patriot, reality having a Liberal bias and all

> Buckwheat was born a Muslim, he was raised a Muslim, he transitioned
> to Americanized Islam (Nation of Islam

Hoo Boy, instead of wasting time trying to untangle those lies, I’ll let Wiki do it for me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_religion_conspiracy_theories
And here too
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_image_of_Barack_Obama#Religion
In The Audacity of Hope, Obama writes that he "was not raised in a religious household". He describes his mother, raised by non-religious parents (whom Obama has specified elsewhere as "non-practicing Methodists and Baptists") to be detached from religion, yet "in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I have ever known". He describes his father as "raised a Muslim", but a "confirmed atheist" by the time his parents met, and his stepfather as "a man who saw religion as not particularly useful". His spiritual change of heart as an adult and his coming to believe in Christianity is a major part of his autobiography Dreams from My Father. “

> then transitioned to Black Liberation theology...

Actually, since according to Wiki, the Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago is the church most frequently cited by press accounts, and by Cone as the best example of a church formally founded on the vision of Black liberation theology, and since President Obama did worship there, we’ll give Patriot that one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology
However, notice Patriot did skip over this:

> > His 20+ years with Rev. Wright (a former Muslim)

Which I shown was based off a wonky quote from Ryan Lizza that apparently was later deleted:

> So where does “Rev Wright was a Muslim” come from – it seems to stem from a 2007 New Republic blog article by Ryan Lizza - that has since been removed – conspiratorial!:
> http://bobmccarty.com/2008/04/08/rev-wright-was-a-former-muslim-and-other-news/
> “first appeared in an article written by Ryan Lizza, senior editor at The New Republic. Though it appeared in TNR’s blog, The Agitator, March 9, 2007, this link takes you to a site where the article in question was”

> "IslamoFascism" isn't a meme:

> "IslamoFascism" is a neologism - look it up...

Indeed, let’s look it up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamofascism
“The term "Islamofascism" is included in the New Oxford American Dictionary, which defines it as "a controversial term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".[1] The term is used in this manner by writers like Stephen Schwartz[2] and Christopher Hitchens,[3] to describe Islamist extremists, including terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah. William Safire makes particular note of Hitchens as a "popularizer" of the word, though Hitchens declined credit for coining it.
<snip>
The origins of the term are uncertain. William Safire writes that the "first use [he] can find" comes from Malise Ruthven in 1990, when Ruthven wrote in The Independent that "authoritarian government, not to say Islamo-fascism, is the rule rather than the exception from Morocco to Pakistan."[6][7] Albert Scardino writes that the term "seems to have appeared first" in a Washington Times piece, in which scholar Khalid Duran used it "as a criticism of hyper-traditionalist clerics."[8] According to the Times, this piece appeared in July 2001”]
So, it’s a meme too, seeing as its bullshit that righties have been pushing for years now, to increase the Fear-Fear-Fear agenda that they used to win elections in the early part of this century.

> "Social-Communist" isn't a meme that I know of any more than "Social
> Democrat" is a meme - "Social Democrat" is the name the Socialists
> GAVE THEMSELVES: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDUSA

Many parties over the years have called themselves Social Democrat or some derivative there-of, there is no issue about that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Democratic_Party

> "Social-Communist Democrat" is more accurate than "Social Democrat"
> because aspects of basic Communism show up in "Social Democrat" plans
> for America...
The Social Democratic party of the US, according to their own website, seem to be the remnants of the Socialist Party of the US (they complain there is another party, the Socialist Party of the US, which split off because they were unwilling to work with the Democratic party, while the Social Democratic party is willing to work with Democrats; however, the Social Democratic Party is NOT the Democratic party, they work with and in the Democratic party
http://www.socialdemocratsusa.org/
> We have no intention of ceding our heritage to self-styled anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats, USA kept the name Socialist Party for our political arm because we are the party of Eugene Debs, Mother Jones, Helen Keller, Carl Sandburg, Norman Thomas, A. Philip Randolph, Bayard Rustin, and thousands of people who worked to build the civil rights and trade union movements in this country. Many good folks gave their lives in these movements.
The Socialist Party, USA, in 1956, chose to stop running candidates of its own, except on rare occasion. During the 1960's, we began to work in the Democratic Party. This is where our allies in the civil rights and trade union movement worked and continue to work politically. We are proud of what we helped accomplish within the Democratic Party, particularly the civil rights legislation and anti-poverty programs of the the 1960's.”
Heh, “self-styled anarchists and revolutionaries” – they seem to be talking about “Take Back OUR country” Tea-Partiers here, rather than actual socialists.
Anyway, “Social-Communist Democrat” doesn’t seem to exist now as a real party (although it seems to exist as a concept, and in some Civilization-type on-line games), and only inside the mind of deranged righties (like soon to be former Representative Allen West…and idiot poster Patriot Flamer) is the Democratic party “Communist”

> I realize that your Nazi-like tendencies

“Nazi-like” tendencies, Patriot? If you’re referring to US Political Parties, perhaps you should remember which party has the tendency toward Authoritarianism; and if not Mr John Dean will remind you:
John Dean: Authoritarianism Rules Republicans
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2006/07/john_dean_autho.html
<Patriot Flamer Blah-Blah-Blah snipped>

> >No way it could be the idiot crap candidates that the Republican party was running for office, could it?
> No, it couldn't, because Republican voter registration was less than

> Democrat registration long before actual campaigning and primaries got
> started....
So what? Are you saying Democrats would never vote for a Republican? Well, not the currently insane bunch of Corporatists, Tea-Partiers, War-Mongers, and other fools you guys ran this year, but Democrats will vote for Republicans when their decent moderates (Hint: Scott Brown was NEITHER, although he’d probably would have been a good example of a hard-right back-bencher if political sanity was restored to the Republican party.

<Patriot Flamer Blah-Blah-Blah snipped>

> >> a) 80 million Baby Boomers are going to die off. The Baby Boomers are
> >> 100% of the World War I, World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War veterans

> >> b) The Baby Boomers are 100% of the so-called 'Reagan Democrats.'

> >Hmm, in 1980 the oldest Boomer would be about, what, 35?
> >So nobody in their 40s or 50s at that time became a Reagan Democrat?
> Let me know when you figure out that "40s or 50s" is OLDER THAN "35."

-- OK, Patriot, since you’ve shown yourself in previous posts to be mathematically challenged:
1980 – 32 years ago – also the Election of Ronald Reagan and rise of “Reagan Democrats”
Baby boom starts, eh, 1946, so 1980 – 1946 = oldest Boomer at the time = 34 years old.
Where there people at the time older than 34 who were also Reagan Democrats? Sure; are those people still alive? 32 years ago + 35 years old (or older) = 67 years old, which would be the youngest of the non-Boomer Reagan Democrats, and yep, many are still alive today.
“The Baby Boomers are 100% of the so-called 'Reagan Democrats” = yet ANOTHER BUSTED PATRIOT FALSEHOOD
-- Also, I see Patriot Flamer skipped over this obvious mistake of his:
“Baby Boomers are 100% of the World War I, World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War veterans”
Baby Boomers joining the USAAF 2 years before they were born – yeah…

> >> c) The Baby Boomers were/are AT A MINIMUM fiscally conservative,
> >> socially moderate (not liberal) and pro-military, pro-defense,
> >> pro-gun, and pro-American Exceptionalism.

-- And, as was shown, President Obama is a Baby Boomer (born 1961).

> >> e) Conservatism, as it exists today, from limp (GOP) to extreme
> >> (so-called religious right) is unquestionably going EXTINCT and
> >> NOTHING CAN SAVE IT. It could take most of the next 20 to 25 years of
> >> the Baby Boomer die-off to see Conservatism become fully extinct but
> >> on the national level it is ALREADY DEAD.

This bizarre bit of spit-feckled hyperbole (especially “ALREADY DEAD”) by Patriot is so ridiculous that I had to, as the Brits say, “take the Piss out of him” by paraphrasing various well known “Death” phrases
The originals, for the humor impaired righties:

> Your political beliefs are already dead.

-- Your men are already dead – Agent Smith, The Matrix

> The GOP - It’s dead, Jim.

-- He’s dead, Jim - Doctor McCoy, Star Trek (TOS, numerous times)

> The Old Southern Strategy was as dead as a door-nail.

-- Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail – A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens
> With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do - Vote third party.
-- With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do. Go through his clothes and -- look for loose change – Miracle Max, Princess Bride

> I see dead political beliefs

-- I See dead people – Cole Sear, The Sixth Sense
> Dead Party walking
-- Dead Man Walking, of course (numerous sources)

> I voted GOP in Reno, just to watch it die.

-- I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die – Folsom Prison Blues by Johnny Cash

> YOU KILLED CONSERVATISM – YOU BASTARDS!

Oh My God, THEY KILLED KENNY! YOU BASTARDS! – South Park, numerous times

> >Good, does that mean you going to shut up and leave now, Patriot?

> I'm having way too much fun to leave anytime soon. Plus, I have

> unfinished business I intend to complete.

You don’t seem to be having much fun, I wonder if the meth is really affecting your head.

<Patriot Flamer Blah-Blah-Blah snipped>

> >Watching way too much ï¿½Revolutionï¿½ on NBC nowadays, Patriot?

> >Actually, maybe it was the new "Red Dawn", or reruns of "Jericho".
> Never heard of them...

Not my problem that you’re ignorant, but to be helpful - Here You go, Patriot old man:
“Revolution”- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2070791/
“Red Dawn” (2012) - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234719/ (US invaded by NORTH KOREA!)
“Jericho” - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0805663/
Plenty more dystopian Sci-Fi out there for you to view, Patriot - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dystopian_films

Osvaldo Gregory Leroy-Dombrowski

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 5:47:31 PM11/11/12

to

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:58:24 -0700 (PDT), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 18, 10:29 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
>rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do women that work in Obama's Whitehouse make less than men doing the
>> same job??
>Why not answer you own question and provide proof of your answer?
>Or is it that your purpose in raising this "question" is to make some
>people doubt "Obama's Whitehouse[sic]" does give equal pay to men and
>women in the same positions on his staff -- when in fact you do NOT
>KNOW is this is *true* or *not?
>In other words, you are trying to create a "straw horse" -- and you
>really did a shitty job of it, Westergrom.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

According to a report published by the Washington Free Beacon in
April, the 2011 annual report on White House staffers revealed that
the median annual salary for female White House employees was 18% less
than male employees — $60,000 compared with $71,000.

During the 2008 campaign, columnist Deroy Murdock wrote that female
staffers in Obama's U.S. Senate office were also shortchanged.
"Obama's average male employee earned $54,397," Murdock inferred from
Senate salary records. But the future president's "30 female employees
(earned) $45,152, on average."

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/101812-629933-obama-white-house-pays-women-less.htm?p=full

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 5:49:12 PM11/11/12

to

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:48:53 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 10, 7:12 pm, "bustyourf...@rocketmail.com"
><bustyourf...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
>> >On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>> >http://www.democrathallofshame" wrote:
>> >> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
>> >> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
>> >> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.
>> --
>> >http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim...
>> >Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
>>
>> >As Salam Alaikum
>> >Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
>> >a Muslim.
>> >Its doesn't matter who your father was.
>> --
>> A blog?????? You tried to use a BLOG OPINION to prove
>> something???????????????
>

>You..................

How many dicks have you sucked this weekend, Fwankie?????????

TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

S Everett

unread,

Nov 11, 2012, 5:49:26 PM11/11/12

to

Sir Gay is an unidentified imposter (sock puppet) and scores 9.4 on
the Faggotry Meter. (Which strongly suggests he is a sock puppet of
Fwanklin Hummer, although others suggest he is a sock of Retardia or
Lickin' Ass.) Sir Gay is mostly a public imbecile, a proven liar and
an ultra-left butthurt faggot.

[][][][][][]

The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:44:10 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ray
<waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 11, 9:09 am, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>http://www.democrathallofshame.com"
><patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com> wrote:
>> http://mobile.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSBRE8390ZW20120410
>> Drugs help some women with incontinence
>> Tue, Apr 10 2012
>>Re: DemocRAT Health Update - Drugs Help Some 'RAT Women Avoid
>>Peeing On Themselves ('Lickin' Ass and Fakin' Military Service'
>>MUST READ!)
>So Patriot, you claim only Democratic women will benefit from this
>drug, do you? (at least that's what your thread title states).

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What part pf "some" do you think means "ALL?"

Why are you so fucking stupid???????????????

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 8:21:33 AM11/12/12

to

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:48:53 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 10, 7:12 pm, "bustyourf...@rocketmail.com"
><bustyourf...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
>> >On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>> >http://www.democrathallofshame" wrote:
>> >> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
>> >> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
>> >> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.

>> >http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim...
>> >Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
>> >As Salam Alaikum
>> >Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
>> >a Muslim.
>> >Its doesn't matter who your father was.

>> A blog?????? You tried to use a BLOG OPINION to prove
>> something???????????????

>Accurate information remains the truth

As a Proven Liar NO ONE will ever take your word for ANYTHING and NO
ONE will ever take the OPINION of an UNKNOWN source from a BLOG as
"accurate" or as the "truth."

Buster caught YOU lying, again...

Buster CITED a credentialed source...

Sucks being you (in more ways than one...)

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 8:56:22 AM11/12/12

to

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:03:10 -0800 (PST), Sir Ray
<waterb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sunday, November 11, 2012 7:40:41 AM UTC-8, patrio...@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com wrote:
>> The facts are what they are...

>> Buckwheat was born a Muslim, he was raised a Muslim, he transitioned
>> to Americanized Islam (Nation of Islam

>And here too
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_image_of_Barack_Obama#Religion
>In The Audacity of Hope, Obama writes that he "was not raised in a
>religious household". He describes his mother, raised by non-religious
>parents (whom Obama has specified elsewhere as "non-practicing
>Methodists and Baptists") to be detached from religion, yet "in many
>ways the most spiritually awakened person that I have ever known".

So, you are CONFIRMING that Fwankie's Blog reference WAS A LIE???

Thanks...

>He describes his father as "raised a Muslim", but a "confirmed
>atheist" by the time his parents met,

Oops! Caught lying...

We KNOW FOR A DOCUMENTED FACT that Buckwheat was named in the ISLAMIC
NAMING TRADITION by his father... If his father was a "confirmed
atheist" he would NOT have named BUckwheat after the Islamic naming
tradition...

We KNOW FOR A DOCUMENTED FACT that Buckwheat was enrolled in school as
a MUSLIM... If Buckwheat's father was a "confirmed atheist" and his
stepfather didn't care for religion and his mother was "detached from
religion" they would NOT have enrolled Buckwheat as a Muslim...

>> "Social-Communist Democrat" is more accurate than "Social Democrat"
>> because aspects of basic Communism show up in "Social Democrat" plans
>> for America...

>Anyway, “Social-Communist Democrat” doesn’t seem to exist now as a real party

Of course it does, see here: http://www.democrats.org/

>> I realize that your Nazi-like tendencies
>“Nazi-like” tendencies, Patriot? If you’re referring to US Political

>Prties, perhaps you should remember which party has the tendency
>toward Authoritarianism

I remember this:

Who oppressed Jewish religious freedom in Germany? Nazis.
Who oppressed Christian religious freedom in America? Democrats.

Who consolidated all state security organizations in Germany? Nazis.
Who consolidated all state security organizations in America?
Democrats.

Who censored all media but their own? Nazis.
Who tried to censor and remove Rush Limbaugh from Radio? Democrats.

Who confiscated firearms in Germany? Nazis.
Who confiscated firearms in America? Democrats.

Who banned firearms in Germany? Nazis.
Who banned firearms in America? Democrats.
Who wants to ban firearms in America, again? Democrats.

Now we know who the REAL Nazis are.

Democrats = Nazis.

>> >No way it could be the idiot crap candidates that the Republican party was running for office, could it?
>> No, it couldn't, because Republican voter registration was less than
>> Democrat registration long before actual campaigning and primaries got
>> started....
>So what?

It's not my fault you're stupid...

The decision to register to vote is far more 'telling' than an actual
vote. Some unknown number of people will vote for "the lesser of two
evils" (or variations thereof) but NOBODY registers to vote for that
purpose. As it happens everybody I knoiw voted for Mitt and NONE OF
THEM actually preferred Mitt as the GOP candidate...

YOU SAID registration was down because of "crap candidates that the
Republican party was running for office" when said registration WOULD
HAVE TO BE DONE BEFORE candidates (and their positions, and the party
platform) were even KNOWN...

Try to keep up...

>Are you saying Democrats would never vote for a Republican?

I'd say 99.99% of DemocRATs would never vote for a Republican.

>> >> a) 80 million Baby Boomers are going to die off. The Baby Boomers are
>> >> 100% of the World War I, World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War veterans
>> >> b) The Baby Boomers are 100% of the so-called 'Reagan Democrats.'
>> >Hmm, in 1980 the oldest Boomer would be about, what, 35?
>> >So nobody in their 40s or 50s at that time became a Reagan Democrat?
>> Let me know when you figure out that "40s or 50s" is OLDER THAN "35."

>Where there people at the time older than 34 who were also Reagan Democrats? Sure

I already said that...

>are those people still alive?

Who cares? What matters is they WILL NOT BE ALIVE after the Baby
Boomer die-off...

Try to keep up...

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 9:01:06 AM11/12/12

to

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:49:12 -0200, "bustyo...@rocketmail.com"
<bustyo...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:48:53 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
><thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Nov 10, 7:12 pm, "bustyourf...@rocketmail.com"
>><bustyourf...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
>>> >On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame.com
>>> >http://www.democrathallofshame" wrote:
>>> >> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
>>> >> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
>>> >> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.

>>> >http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim...
>>> >Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
>>> >As Salam Alaikum
>>> >Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
>>> >a Muslim.
>>> >Its doesn't matter who your father was.

>>> A blog?????? You tried to use a BLOG OPINION to prove
>>> something???????????????
>>You..................
>How many dicks have you sucked this weekend, Fwankie?????????
>TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dude... Fwankie is 'married' to another faggot... If they're trying
to pretend to be normal people then he only played ONE skin flute last
weekend...

I guess you could ask him how many times... But he's never gonna tell
ya...

Tom Swift Sr.

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 9:26:21 AM11/12/12

to

On Nov 11, 5:49 pm, "bustourf...@rocketmail.com" wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:48:53 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
> >On Nov 10, 7:12 pm, "bustourf...@rocketmail.com" wrote:
> >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
> >> >On Nov 10, 12:03 pm, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame" wrote:
> >> >> No, Buckwheat is a Muslim. In the Islamic world if your father is a
> >> >> Muslim YOU ARE a Muslim with exactly one exception - You must
> >> >> publiclly denouce Islam to be kicked out.
> >> --
> >> >http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showthread.php?59863-Are-you-a-Muslim...
> >> >Re: Are you a Muslim if your Father is a Muslim?
> >> >As Salam Alaikum
> >> >Once you pronounce belief in the Christian trinity, you are no longer
> >> >a Muslim.
> >> >Its doesn't matter who your father was.
> >> --
> >> A blog?????? You tried to use a BLOG OPINION to prove
> >> something???????????????

> --
> >You...

[What you edited out, because you cannnot deny the truth of it,
Games.]

...fool, Bob Milby Jr.

Accurate information remains the truth, Bobby, no mattter where and
in
what form it is. Reality is Reality.

Your paranoid delusions always collapse when they meet Reality

Deal with it, Junior.

But of course, you cannot because you are seriously *delusional*, Bob
Milby Jr., aka Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of
sockpuppets

> How many dicks have you sucked this weekend, Fwankie?????????

Because you cannot reasonable contradict the truth of what I wrote,
you again resort to one of your standard, emotionally and
intellectually immature personal attacks. You are just so pathetic,
Bobby!

> TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ROTFL!

You want the truth? I'll tell you the truth, you homophobic,
bigotted, racist, self-centered, un-Christian, selfish,
uncompassionate, hate-filled shithead.

But you won't believe it, because your "thinking" is so fucking
twisted and distorted by your willfully-ignorant hate.

Here's one of your vicious quotes, LIAR:

"Possible Fag Butt-Buddy: Arnold D Thomas (Age 52)"

First, you clueless moron, as I and others have told you, you are *2*
years behind in your information, because you wrote that idiotic, cut-
and-paste bullshit years ago and have NEVER bothered to update it.
even though you keep posting it. That makes you a dumbass "PROVEN
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Second, you lying, xenophobic fool, Mr. Arnold is my *roommate* -- and
nothing more -- and we've lived nearly 21+ years together. A lot of
gay men are far, far less obsessed with sex that YOU are, "Buster",
you supposed-heterosexual. LOL.

"TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
-- Hysterical, psychotic, SHRIEKING Bob Milby Jr. all
all.

I've been abstinent for nearly 21 years now, Junior, because I want to
be in a committed relationship first.

I hope you gag on the truth, Bob Milby Jr.

P.S. As I told you, Bobby, I just returned to alt.politics for a
while, until the President Elections were over and our President Obama
was re-elected, just so I could watch you go even farther over the
deep end that you already were.

Oh, and Junior, you have not dissappointed me at all with your utter
foolishness!

So, Bobby, I'm gonna be posting a lot less again, esepcially to you,
you fucking waste-of-time, because I have had my satisfication at
seeming you *HUMLIATED* publicly yet once again.

But I will be back come mid-January 2013, when Barack Obama is sworn
in once again as our President for *another* 4 years. Maybe you'll
have a stroke then, Junior.

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 6:05:40 PM11/12/12

to

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:01:06 -0500,
"patrio...@democrathallofshame.com
http://www.democrathallofshame.com"

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>
>I guess you could ask him how many times... But he's never gonna tell
>ya...

HUNDREDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Message has been deleted

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 6:38:09 PM11/12/12

to

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:26:21 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> How many dicks have you sucked this weekend, Fwankie?????????
>

>Because you.................

ANSWER THE QUESTION, FAGGOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>> TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>ROTFL!
>
>You want the truth? I'll tell you the truth, you

TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!

How many dicks have you sucked last weekend, Fwankie?????????

>Here's one of your vicious quotes, LIAR:
>
>"Possible Fag Butt-Buddy: Arnold D Thomas (Age 52)"

Vicious??????????? Its not vicious its true......

A) You are a faggot............
B) Arnold is a faggot..............
C) You KNOW you sucked his butthole.........
D) You KNOW he sucked your butthole............
E) Butt-buddies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>
>Second, you lying, xenophobic fool, Mr. Arnold is my *roommate* -- and
>nothing more -- and we've lived nearly 21+ years together. A lot of
>gay men are far, far less obsessed with sex that YOU are, "Buster",
>you supposed-heterosexual. LOL.

OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHH............ I see...........

Now we know.............

Erectile dysfunction common in men with HIV
http://www.aidsmap.com/page/1437023/

>I've been abstinent for nearly 21 years now, Junior, because I want to
>be in a committed relationship first.

21 years!!!!!!!!!!!! DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!!!!!!!! When you gonna
realize you are stone cold barking ugly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

21 years!!!!!!!!!!! I bet Arnold done sucked 150,000 dicks in 21
years!!!!!!!!!! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>
>I hope you gag on the truth, Bob Milby Jr.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I guess we don't have to worry about YOU GAGGING ON DICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>
>
>P.S. As I told you, Bobby

OH..... You know what???????? I'm gonna catch Hell for this but you
should know that the real Robert Milby (in Jacksonville) is an
alcoholic and goes to AA and has had some legal troubles......... You
know what?????? That means YOU called Patriot Games an
alcoholic...... That means YOU called Patriot Games someone who goes
to AA......

I suuuuuuuuuuuure hope YOU CAN PROVE those accusations..........

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>So, Bobby, I'm gonna be posting a lot less again

Nobody cares......................

>, esepcially to you,

AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW....................

>
>But I will be back come mid-January 2013

Yep..... That's about right......... Yes you will!!!!!!!!!!!

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,

Nov 12, 2012, 6:38:49 PM11/12/12

to

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:21:33 -0500,

"patrio...@democrathallofshame.com
http://www.democrathallofshame.com"
<patrio...@democrathallofshame.com> wrote:

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

patriotgames@democrathallofshame.com http://www.democrathallofshame.com

unread,

Nov 13, 2012, 9:14:01 AM11/13/12

to

On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:38:09 -0200, "bustyo...@rocketmail.com"
<bustyo...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:26:21 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
><thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>P.S. As I told you, Bobby
>OH..... You know what???????? I'm gonna catch Hell for this but you
>should know that the real Robert Milby (in Jacksonville) is an
>alcoholic and goes to AA and has had some legal troubles......... You
>know what?????? That means YOU called Patriot Games an
>alcoholic...... That means YOU called Patriot Games someone who goes
>to AA......
>I suuuuuuuuuuuure hope YOU CAN PROVE those accusations..........

Doesn't much matter at this point... He'll find out soon enough...

Tom Swift Sr.

unread,

Nov 13, 2012, 9:40:18 AM11/13/12

to

On Nov 12, 6:38 pm, "bustyourf...@rocketmail.com"
<bustyourf...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> [ psychotic delusional bullshit ]

I said you would not be able to accept the truth.

Facts just don't fit in with your far-right, twisted, hate-filled,
bigoted *beliefs*

Oh and I still you are still posting to yourself again. It's stupid
shit like that which got you nominated to alt.usenet.kook's "The Order
of the Holey Sockpuppet".

I'd tell you to go get a Life, but it's too late for that.

You're a insane loser, Bobby.

You're just pathetic.

And, now, obsessively, you will:

-----
-----
Please Note:

In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka

Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of Sockpuppets -- and the

winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.

We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,

psychotic interruption.
------
------

Tom Swift Sr.

unread,

Nov 13, 2012, 9:51:33 AM11/13/12

to

On Nov 12, 6:38 pm, "bustyourf...@rocketmail.com" wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov, "patriotga...@democrathallofshame" wrote

> >Buster caught YOU lying, again...
> >Buster CITED a credentialed source...
> >Sucks being you (in more ways than one...)

> --
> HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I still you are still posting to yourself again, Bobby, using your
Patriot Games account and sockpuppet Buster Norris.

It's stupid shit like that which got you nominated to
alt.usenet.kook's "The Order of the Holey Sockpuppet".

Are you so delusional you truly do NOT understand that all the
rational (and I suspect even a lot of the irrational!) posters and
lurkers in these news groups KNOW that you, Bob Milby, Jr. are Patriot
Games, Buster Norris, and all your 1000s of Sockpuppets are the same
person?!

Yes, I think you *are* that delusional, Junior.

Now pathetic, Bobby.

==============

Fresh from his victory as K00K of the Month for September, Bob Milby
Jr.aka Patriot Games aka Buster Norris aka 1000s of Sockpuppets has
again been nominated for a different alt.usenet.kooks Award for
October!

This is *your* chance to vote for him!

======================
* October 2012 Nomination for The Order of the Holey Sockpuppet *

(Vote yes or no):

Bob Milby Jr., aka Patriot Games [aka Buster Norris, aka
1000s of Sockpuppets]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* Order of the Holey Sockpuppet *

A special Kookternity comprised of those most prolific in the art of,
abiet thinly, disguising their net.presence behind whatever nose and
glasses they can concoct. A Kook Art that came into its own, and
received its name, from the work of the late purveyor to the cotton-
bound masses, Earl Curley.

----------------
----------------

For full voting information and Official Ballot, go to:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/03d0fd4c4162bc98?hl=en

Let's all show Bob how we feel about him. VOTE NOW!
==============

-----
-----
Please Note:

In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka

Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of Sockpuppets -- and the

bustyo...@rocketmail.com

unread,

Nov 13, 2012, 6:17:24 PM11/13/12

to

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:14:01 -0500,
"patrio...@democrathallofshame.com
http://www.democrathallofshame.com"

<patrio...@democrathallofshame.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:38:09 -0200, "bustyo...@rocketmail.com"
><bustyo...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:26:21 -0800 (PST), "Tom Swift Sr."
>><thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>P.S. As I told you, Bobby
>>OH..... You know what???????? I'm gonna catch Hell for this but you
>>should know that the real Robert Milby (in Jacksonville) is an
>>alcoholic and goes to AA and has had some legal troubles......... You
>>know what?????? That means YOU called Patriot Games an
>>alcoholic...... That means YOU called Patriot Games someone who goes
>>to AA......
>>I suuuuuuuuuuuure hope YOU CAN PROVE those accusations..........
>
>Doesn't much matter at this point... He'll find out soon enough...

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rico Millicent Aranda

unread,

Nov 13, 2012, 6:18:00 PM11/13/12

to

Real name Fwanklin. Fwanklin is a famous homo. Fwanklin's 15 seconds
of fame came at a Star Trek Convention when he embarrassed the
audience, embarrassed America, embarrassed humanity and embarrassed
Gene Roddenberry by asking why Star Trek didn't have any faggot
characters. Fwanklin, after many beatings, has become just another
cock-slapped usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they have been exposed,
frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo monkey who sits in
the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying nothing of value.

Franklin Hummel - Age 57, born May 1953
18 Linwood St, Unit 3
Boston, Massachusetts 02119-1543
(617) 541-3834
E-mail: hum...@world.std.com

Possible Fag Butt-Buddy: Arnold D Thomas (Age 52)

Franklin Hummel - Supervisor
Boston Public Library
700 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(617) 536-5400
(617) 536-3813 Fax
www.bpl.org

http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hummel_Franklin_61179943.aspx

[][][][][][]

The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:27:46 -0800 (PST), Franklin Hummel
<frankli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I remember reading in alt.politics a few months ago how the K00Ks were
>making a Big Issue that the series' premire of Palin's ALASKA had the
>Largest Ratings Number of any show's premire on whatever cable network
>the show was on. Now it's been cancelled.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Silver Spring, Md.-based TLC.... The network on Thursday confirmed
this TV season's worst kept secret: it has acquired global rights to
the eight-episode "Sarah Palin's Alaska,".....Boss," "Little People,
Big World," and "I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant."

Discovery makes it official: "Sarah Palin's Alaska" to TLC
March 25, 2010
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/tvblog/2010/03/discovery-makes-official-its-s.html

The show was only 8 episodes from the start................

(They added a bonus 9th episode due to its popularity........)

Oh, and you forget to announce you were a FAGGOT before you started
LYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Belva Schnell

unread,

Nov 13, 2012, 6:18:17 PM11/13/12

to

On Tue, 3 May 2011 03:54:32 -0700 (PDT), Franklin Hummel
<franklin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 2, 11:50�pm, Patriot Games = topcat =
>Buster Norris = Crazy Bastard = Bob Milby Jr.
>irrationally SHRIEKED:
>> On Mon, 02 May 2011, rwalker wrote:
>> >WorldNutDaily is not a reliable source.
>> -
>> Prove it..................
>---------------
>http://atheism.about.com/b/2004/12/27/wing-nut-daily-and-dragons.htm
>*Wing Nut Daily and Dragons*

>http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41977

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your cite is NOT a news article, its COMMENTARY...............

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!