Obama Makes America Great Again

[Bradley K. Sherman]

Thanks again, Mr. Obama:
|
| U.S. private payrolls increased more than expected in June
| and fewer Americans applied for unemployment benefits last
| week, suggesting a rebound in job growth after May's paltry
| gains.
|
| Thursday's reports underscored the economy's strength and
| supported views that the United States would weather the
| impact of last month's British referendum to leave the
| European Union.
|
| "The labor market is tight, there are plenty of job
| openings, firms are holding onto labor, and the main factor
| restraining job growth is a skills mismatch between
| available workers and the needs of employers," said John
| Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics in New York.
| ...
<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy-jobless-idUSKCN0ZN19S>

--bks

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

On 07/07/2016 10:00 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> Thanks again, Mr. Obama:
> |
> | U.S. private payrolls increased more than expected in June
> | and fewer Americans applied for unemployment benefits last
> | week, suggesting a rebound in job growth after May's paltry
> | gains.
> |

And the coal industry starts laying off workers.... so the word is
STAGNANT, which is what it's been for 7.5 years with Obama's policies..


--
That's Karma ;)

Obama has no problem calling the police, racists and condemning them.

Why so much difficulty calling Muslims, terrorists and condemning them?

[Bradley K. Sherman]

Beam Me Up Scotty <Liberalism-is-exposed-as-unsustainab...@cyberspace.nebulax.com> wrote:
>On 07/07/2016 10:00 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>> Thanks again, Mr. Obama:
>> |
>> | U.S. private payrolls increased more than expected in June
>> | and fewer Americans applied for unemployment benefits last
>> | week, suggesting a rebound in job growth after May's paltry
>> | gains.
>> |
>
>And the coal industry starts laying off workers.... so the word is
>STAGNANT, which is what it's been for 7.5 years with Obama's policies..

> ...

You obviously don't remember the ruins of an economy
inherited by Obama. If the racist GOP Congress hadn't
dragged their feet for the past seven years, this would
be a golden age.

--bks

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

You mean to say... The economy is stagnant and Obama didn't work with
congress so there is NO improvement thanks to Obama?

Well that may be true but Obama did use his pen and his phone to go
around congress. That plan to "cut Congress out of the Legislative
process" seems to be what you're saying was a failure. Obama took the
wrong path when it comes to getting his policies passed, he pushed
several like immigration where the Supreme Court found Obama's policies
to be unconstitutional, which would tend to suggest that the GOP
Congress was correct to reject Obama's threats and bully tactics.

[jane.playne]

.

Take a look at the employment/population ratio (16 and older); it sucks

https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2014/05/labor-market-conditions-good-or-not-so-good/

NOW, take a look at the group from 25-54.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060
There is improvement, BUT there are two problems:

1. We are a LONG way from getting back to the pre recession levels. The
levels for 25-54 haven't been this low since the 80s.

2. Those who are from 16-25 are having a hard time into the job market
AND the group above 54 is having a hard time getting *back* into the job
market.

The first item indicates what Robert Reich said, "Worst Economic
Recovery On Record". The second item indicates that the worst recovery
on record is leaving the young and those over 54 behind.

[Bradley K. Sherman]

Thank you, President Obama!
|
| Quashing worries that job growth was flagging, the
| government on Friday reported that employers increased
| payrolls by 287,000 in June. It was an arresting surge in
| hiring just weeks before the Republican and Democratic
| conventions where the presidential nominees will present
| their competing economic visions.
| ...
| "Wow, this one takes my breath away," said Diane Swonk, an
| independent economist in Chicago.
| ...
<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-wages.html>

--bks

[jane.playne]

.

You are a typical dishonest progressive. You are incapable of standing
up against the truth, so you snip the truth (posted by the government)
in hopes that people will not look above your reply to me and see that
truth that you had dishonestly snipped.

[Bradley K. Sherman]

jane.playne <jane....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 7/8/2016 12:58 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>> Thank you, President Obama!
>> |
>> | Quashing worries that job growth was flagging, the
>> | government on Friday reported that employers increased
>> | payrolls by 287,000 in June. It was an arresting surge in
>> | hiring just weeks before the Republican and Democratic
>> | conventions where the presidential nominees will present
>> | their competing economic visions.
>> | ...
>> | "Wow, this one takes my breath away," said Diane Swonk, an
>> | independent economist in Chicago.
>> | ...
>>
><http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-wages.html>
>>
>

>You are a typical dishonest progressive.

Har! I'm quoting *chapter and verse* while Jane is making sh.t up
and calling people names.

--bks

[jane.playne]

.

HAR back at ya.

YOU quoted *chapter and verse* of a *news article*.

I posted government supplied data and government generated graphs
[1][2]... and you claimed that *I* am "making sh.t up" !!!!!

> and calling people names.
>
> --bks
>

I do confess that calling someone a progressive is about as derogatory
as it gets.




citations:

1.
https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2014/05/labor-market-conditions-good-or-not-so-good/

2.
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060

[Bradley K. Sherman]

jane.playne <jane....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 7/8/2016 2:16 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>> jane.playne <jane....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/8/2016 12:58 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>> |
>>>> | Quashing worries that job growth was flagging, the
>>>> | government on Friday reported that employers increased
>>>> | payrolls by 287,000 in June. It was an arresting surge in

>>>> | ...
><http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/business/economy/jobs-report-unemployment-wages.html>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are a typical dishonest progressive.
>>
>> Har! I'm quoting *chapter and verse* while Jane is making sh.t up

> ...

>YOU quoted *chapter and verse* of a *news article*.

> ...

A news article that beings "Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics"!!

--bks

[jane.playne]

.

I did not dispute the BLS data in your article; I exposed the data as
being PRESENTED as BIASED and I exposed the data as being PARTIAL data.

For example ... from that same BLS report:

1. Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult women
and Whites rose in June.

2. The number of persons unemployed less than 5 weeks increased by
211,000 in June, ...

3. In June, the number of job losers and persons who completed temporary
jobs rose by 203,000 to 3.8 million

4. Both the labor force participation rate, at 62.7 percent, and the
employment-population ratio, at 59.6 percent, changed little in June.
(See table A-1.)

5. ... the number of unemployed persons increased by 347,000 to 7.8 million.


... AND ...

YOU had to snip my citations from the BLS because you could not dispute
them.

The employment/population ratio for 25-54 hasn't been this low since
the 80s.

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060

[Lee]

Not only are that many new jobs being created,
but replacement workers are being hired to fill
the jobs of the 10,000 baby boomers who retire
EVERY DAY.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/07/24/do-10000-
baby-boomers-retire-every-day/


http://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/032216/are-we-baby
-boomer-retirement-crisis.asp

[jane.playne]

.

And that is EXACTLY why I presented the BLS data for the 25-54 age
group; to prevent idiots like you from blaming the low
employment/population ratio on the retirees.

That employment to population ratio for 25-54 is STILL the lowest since
the 80's.

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060


"Worst Economic Recovery On Record" - Robert Reich

[Bradley K. Sherman]

Thank you, Mr. President!
|
| NEW YORK, July 8 The benchmark S&P 500 stock index traded
| above its record close on Friday as Wall Street rallied
| after a much-larger-than-expected print in jobs growth
| confirmed the U.S. economy has regained speed after a
| first-quarter lull.
|
| The S&P traded less than four points away from the all-time
| intraday high of 2,134.72 reached in May 2015.
| ...
<http://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks-idUSL1N19U1FQ?feedType=RSS&feedName=marketsNews>

--bks

[Man of Mind]

On 7/8/2016 2:48 PM, plain.shame wrote:
>
> That employment to population ratio for 25-54 is STILL the lowest since
> the 80's.

To which we can thank Ronald Reagan and Republicans for..


Something about a 'rising tide lifting all boats', which was
more accurately described later as "voodoo economics"..

--
Republicans often as not create the very problems they say
that they're trying to solve, while blaming the Democratic
Party for what they did..

[Steve]

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:39:59 -0500, Kurt Lochner
<kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On 7/8/2016 6:18 PM, plain.shame wrote:
>>
>> On 7/8/2016 4:46 PM, Kurt Lochner wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2016 2:47 PM, Faulty Sham wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Look at this web site and then come back and tell us how great Obama
>>>> is doing.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.zerohedge.com
>>>
>>> Still citing a discredited communist-run hedge fund blog, hunh?
>>>
>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-29/unmasking-the-men-behind-zero-hedge-wall-street-s-renegade-blog
>>>
>>> After more than a year writing for the financial website Zero Hedge
>>> under the nom de doom of the cult classic’s anarchic hero, Lokey’s going
>>> public. In doing so, he’s answering a question that has bedeviled Wall
>>> Street since the site sprang up seven years ago: Just who is Tyler
>>> Durden, anyway?
>>>
>>> The answer, it turns out, is three people. Following an acrimonious
>>> departure this month, in which two-thirds of the trio traded allegations
>>> of hypocrisy and mental instability, Lokey, 32, decided to unmask
>>> himself and his fellow Durdens.
>>>
>>> Lokey said the other two men are Daniel Ivandjiiski, 37, the
>>> Bulgarian-born former analyst long reputed to be behind the site, and
>>> Tim Backshall, 45, a well-known credit derivatives strategist.
>>> (Bloomberg LP competes with Zero Hedge in providing financial news and
>>> information.)
>>>
>>> In a telephone interview, Ivandjiiski confirmed that the men had been
>>> the only Tyler Durdens on the payroll since Lokey came aboard last year,
>>> but he criticized his former colleague's decision to come forward.
>>> ..
>>> Ivandjiiski worked for a hedge fund before being barred by the Financial
>>> Industry Regulatory Authority in 2008 for insider trading. He didn’t
>>> admit or deny wrongdoing, the agency said. Backshall is a familiar face
>>> on financial news networks who has been quoted by media outlets,
>>> including Bloomberg. His involvement with Zero Hedge, along with that of
>>> Lokey, hasn’t been widely known.
>>> ..
>>> A former “director of contributor success” at website Seeking Alpha,
>>> Lokey said he joined Zero Hedge for $6,000 a month and received an
>>> annual bonus of $50,000, earning more than $100,000 last year. His
>>> salary helped pay the rent on a “very nice” condominium on South
>>> Carolina’s Hilton Head Island, he said. Despite the compensation, he
>>> contends that he left because he disagreed with the site's editorial
>>> vision. “Reality checks are great. But Zero Hedge ceased to serve that
>>> public service years ago,” Lokey wrote. “They care what generates page
>>> views. Clicks. Money.”
>>> ..
>>> Lokey, who said he wrote much of the site’s political content, claimed
>>> there was pressure to frame issues in a way he felt was disingenuous. “I
>>> tried to inject as much truth as I could into my posts, but there’s no
>>> room for it. “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent
>>> leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history
>>> of statecraft,” Lokey wrote, describing his take on the website's
>>> politics. Ivandjiiski countered that Lokey could write “anything and
>>> everything he wanted directly without anyone writing over it.”
>>>
>>>
>>> *>LOL!<* You've been 'had', over and over again, slaphead!..
>>
>> Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest to avoid
>> calling people derogatory or defamatory names
>
>
>You've again contradicted yourself with your 'thesis' statement..
>
>
>> HOWEVER, in your case, there is no sense in tap dancing around it
>
>
>Yes, you quite simply are ignorant of the entire subject of
>economics, and simply 'cherry-pick' the figures to suit your
>conclusions.
>
>> The fallacy of your response is called "attacking the messenger".
>
>
>Like you just didn't do the very same thing, now how'd that go?
>
>
>"Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest
> to avoid calling people derogatory or defamatory names"
>
>
>> It fell and has never recovered to the LOWEST pre recession level
>
>
>Only according to you, with your distinct lack of formal knowledge..
>
>> The OBAMA failed recovery
>
>
>Again, only according to your skewed, prejudicial 'facts'..

Lochner wants to imagine that there is a "recovery" yet he has to live
with his mom...

This is from Kurt 'Licknuts' Lochner who incorrectly claimed that
adjusted gross income was gross income minus deductions and
exemptions... Perhaps Licknuts always had his mommy do his taxes...

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/9/2016 3:14 AM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:

Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
personality disorder..


--
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:44:19 -0500
news: <tour941biih7br0kr...@4ax.com>

"It's actually quite satisfying to be hated and despised"

[bruce2...@gmail.com]

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>
> Obama has no problem calling the police, racists

When did Obama call cops racist?

[Steve]

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 07:31:05 -0500, Kurt Lochner
<kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>> Lochner wants to imagine that there is a "recovery"

If there really was a recovery, why does Lochner still live with his
mommy?

>
>Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
>do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
>personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
>emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
>that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
>personality disorder..

So now that you've confirmed that my speculation about your felony
arrest was correct, Lochner, why not tell everyone all about it?


--
Lord, please help me to be even more politically incorrect.

[jane.playne]

.

Kurt has become very tiresome.

Kurt's best counter point to me is similar to a 6 year old saying, "Is not".

.

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/9/2016 3:00 PM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>
> On 7/9/2016 7:31 AM, Kurt Lochner was laughing at:

>>
>> On 7/9/2016 3:14 AM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2016 8:39 PM, Kurt Lochner wrote:
>>>>

>>>> On 7/8/2016 6:18 PM, plain.shame was gurgling to herself:

>>>>
>>>> Yes, you quite simply are ignorant of the entire subject of
>>>> economics, and simply 'cherry-pick' the figures to suit your
>>>> conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>> The fallacy of your response is called "attacking the messenger".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like you just didn't do the very same thing, now how'd that go?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest
>>>> to avoid calling people derogatory or defamatory names"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It fell and has never recovered to the LOWEST pre recession level
>>>>
>>>> Only according to you, with your distinct lack of formal knowledge..
>>>>
>>>>> The OBAMA failed recovery
>>>>
>>>> Again, only according to your skewed, prejudicial 'facts'..
>>>
>>>

>>> Mr. Lochner wants to imagine that there is a "recovery"

>
>
> If there really was a recovery,

Poor little "steven", all whiny and sulking about how
he was caught lying about where he was forced to live,
even though he's referred to it as a 'gated community'..

>> Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
>> do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
>> personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
>> emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
>> that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
>> personality disorder..
>
> So now that you've confirmed that my speculation

Speculation?


You weren't speculating, "steven", you've already admitted
that you've looked up the local court records. That you
refuse to say more of what you know indicates to me that
you know that you've already crossed the line and just
want some more attention for the narcissistic injury
that you've caused yourself so many times over the
years. That your psychopathy is degrading into the sort
of 'low-functioning' symptoms one could expect of a
fourth-grader with low self-esteem causes no surprise.


--
Canyon <steven...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:11:30 GMT
news:<i4tp5v4c5ulhakvei...@4ax.com>

"I never made any claims I couldn't back up...."

..
Canyon <parkie...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:59:42 GMT
news:<rg6q5vgq29cerpocl...@4ax.com>

"I don't need to back anything up, you moron, cause unlike
yourself, my self image is not dependent on what others
think about me."

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/9/2016 3:43 PM, plain.shame was whining about how:

>
> Kurt's best counter point to me is similar to a 6 year

You should see the view from here, fluffy skirts..

--
"Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
gestures which seek to resemble ideas"
-Lionel Trilling

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/9/2016 3:51 PM, plain.shame whimpered because:
>
> Someone's response is similar to Kurt

And yet, your whimpering resembles that of Faulty Sham/Slaphead's..

Why is that, Fluffy Skirts?


By the way, you still haven't disproved this about zerofudge
being a discredited communist hedge fund blog, have you?

*>LOL!<* You've been 'had', Jane's Shame..

[Steve]

On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 15:45:36 -0500, Kurt Lochner
<kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On 7/9/2016 3:00 PM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>
>> On 7/9/2016 7:31 AM, Kurt Lochner was laughing at:
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2016 3:14 AM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/8/2016 8:39 PM, Kurt Lochner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/8/2016 6:18 PM, plain.shame was gurgling to herself:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you quite simply are ignorant of the entire subject of
>>>>> economics, and simply 'cherry-pick' the figures to suit your
>>>>> conclusions.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The fallacy of your response is called "attacking the messenger".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Like you just didn't do the very same thing, now how'd that go?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest
>>>>> to avoid calling people derogatory or defamatory names"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It fell and has never recovered to the LOWEST pre recession level
>>>>>
>>>>> Only according to you, with your distinct lack of formal knowledge..
>>>>>
>>>>>> The OBAMA failed recovery
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, only according to your skewed, prejudicial 'facts'..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Lochner wants to imagine that there is a "recovery"
>>
>>
>> If there really was a recovery,
>
>
>Poor little "steven", all whiny and sulking about how
>he was caught lying about where he was forced to live,
>even though he's referred to it as a 'gated community'..

<GUFFAW> So where do you imagine that I, someone whose name you don't
even know, was forced to live, Loser?

>>> Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
>>> do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
>>> personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
>>> emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
>>> that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
>>> personality disorder..
>>
>> So now that you've confirmed that my speculation
>
>
>Speculation?

Yep..

>You weren't speculating, "steven", you've already admitted
>that you've looked up the local court records.

Nonsense, Licknuts...I simply tossed it out there and watched you
snipping, editing and ducking it. You lefty morons are too easy.

>That you
>refuse to say more of what you know indicates to me that
>you know that you've already crossed the line and just
>want some more attention for the narcissistic injury
>that you've caused yourself so many times over the
>years. That your psychopathy is degrading into the sort
>of 'low-functioning' symptoms one could expect of a
>fourth-grader with low self-esteem causes no surprise.

<LOL> So what line do you "imagine" that I;ve crossed, Dummy.

[Steve]

The poor old fool has problems...

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/9/2016 4:30 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled:
>
> On 7/9/2016 3:45 PM, Kurt Lochner restored:

>>
>> On 7/9/2016 3:00 PM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2016 7:31 AM, Kurt Lochner was laughing at:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/9/2016 3:14 AM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/8/2016 8:39 PM, Kurt Lochner wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/8/2016 6:18 PM, plain.shame was gurgling to herself:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, you quite simply are ignorant of the entire subject of
>>>>>> economics, and simply 'cherry-pick' the figures to suit your
>>>>>> conclusions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fallacy of your response is called "attacking the messenger".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like you just didn't do the very same thing, now how'd that go?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Other than calling people "progressive", I try my very hardest
>>>>>> to avoid calling people derogatory or defamatory names"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It fell and has never recovered to the LOWEST pre recession level
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only according to you, with your distinct lack of formal knowledge..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The OBAMA failed recovery
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again, only according to your skewed, prejudicial 'facts'..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Lochner wants to imagine that there is a "recovery"
>>>
>>>
>>> If there really was a recovery,
>>
>>
>> Poor little "steven", all whiny and sulking about how
>> he was caught lying about where he was forced to live,
>> even though he's referred to it as a 'gated community'..
>>
>>

>>>> Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
>>>> do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
>>>> personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
>>>> emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
>>>> that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
>>>> personality disorder..
>>>
>>> So now that you've confirmed that my speculation
>>
>>
>> Speculation?
>>
>>

>> You weren't speculating, "steven", you've already admitted

>> that you've looked up the local court records. That you

>> refuse to say more of what you know indicates to me that
>> you know that you've already crossed the line and just
>> want some more attention for the narcissistic injury
>> that you've caused yourself so many times over the
>> years. That your psychopathy is degrading into the sort
>> of 'low-functioning' symptoms one could expect of a
>> fourth-grader with low self-esteem causes no surprise.
>
>

> Nonsense, Licknuts...I simply tossed it out there

No, you looked it up, because you're a stalker, as been
pointed out to me by a criminal psychologist that knows you..


How's that 'gated community' you lived at doing these days?

Did you try to turn everyone against each other because
of your malignant narcissistic personality disorder, just
so you could enjoy all the discord you've caused, because
your own life is so miserable that you can help but cry
out for help in rather obvious ways?

[Steve]

<CHUCKLES> Your imagination is running away with you Licky...

>How's that 'gated community' you lived at doing these days?

It's really not that big a deal, Dummy. We just make sure losers like
you can't get in...

>Did you try to turn everyone against each other because
>of your malignant narcissistic personality disorder, just
>so you could enjoy all the discord you've caused, because
>your own life is so miserable that you can help but cry
>out for help in rather obvious ways?

Projection much??????

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/9/2016 7:01 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled some more:
>
> On 7/9/2016 4:58 PM, Kurt Lochner was amused by the denials of:

>>
>> On 7/9/2016 4:30 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled:
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2016 3:45 PM, Kurt Lochner restored:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/9/2016 3:00 PM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/9/2016 7:31 AM, Kurt Lochner was laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/9/2016 3:14 AM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:

......

>>>>>> Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
>>>>>> do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
>>>>>> personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
>>>>>> emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
>>>>>> that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
>>>>>> personality disorder..
>>>>>
>>>>> So now that you've confirmed that my speculation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Speculation?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You weren't speculating, "steven", you've already admitted
>>>> that you've looked up the local court records. That you
>>>> refuse to say more of what you know indicates to me that
>>>> you know that you've already crossed the line and just
>>>> want some more attention for the narcissistic injury
>>>> that you've caused yourself so many times over the
>>>> years. That your psychopathy is degrading into the sort
>>>> of 'low-functioning' symptoms one could expect of a
>>>> fourth-grader with low self-esteem causes no surprise.
>>>
>>>

>>> Nonsense, Mr. Lochner...I simply tossed it out there

>>
>>
>> No, you looked it up, because you're a stalker, as been
>> pointed out to me by a criminal psychologist that knows you..
>
> <CHUCKLES> Your imagination

There's no 'imagining' to it, and your denials strike me as odd..


When are you going to learn how to spell "society"?

>> How's that 'gated community' you lived at doing these days?
>
> It's really not that big a deal

Community service or is it a halfway house?

>> Did you try to turn everyone against each other because
>> of your malignant narcissistic personality disorder, just
>> so you could enjoy all the discord you've caused, because
>> your own life is so miserable that you can help but cry
>> out for help in rather obvious ways?
>
> Projection

On your behalf, noted and logged, yatchingline and all..

[Steve]

Well, you are pretty odd, Licknuts.. with your felonies, that is...

>When are you going to learn how to spell "society"?

What's that silliness about, Dummy?

>>> How's that 'gated community' you lived at doing these days?
>>
>> It's really not that big a deal
>
>
>Community service or is it a halfway house?

That would be your choices.. but instead your mommy took you in...

>>> Did you try to turn everyone against each other because
>>> of your malignant narcissistic personality disorder, just
>>> so you could enjoy all the discord you've caused, because
>>> your own life is so miserable that you can help but cry
>>> out for help in rather obvious ways?
>>

>> Projection much?

>
>
>On your behalf, noted and logged, yatchingline and all..

??? you're getting odder all the time, Licknuts...Maybe you need that
shrink again?

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/10/2016 3:58 AM, Sneezed Crayon foolishly back-pedaled again:
>
> On 7/9/2016 10:00 PM, Kurt Lochner was again amused by the denials of:

>>
>> On 7/9/2016 7:01 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled some more:
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2016 4:58 PM, Kurt Lochner was amused by the denials of:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/9/2016 4:30 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/9/2016 3:45 PM, Kurt Lochner restored:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/9/2016 3:00 PM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/9/2016 7:31 AM, Kurt Lochner was laughing at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2016 3:14 AM, Sneezed Crayon <steven...@yahoo.com> whined:

........

>>>>>>>> Crayon wants very badly to dismiss and downplay others who
>>>>>>>> do not share his tiny-minded opinions, and will stoop to
>>>>>>>> personal attacks that tend to make Crayon look like an
>>>>>>>> emotionally immature individual with some issues resulting
>>>>>>>> that Crayon over-compensates for with a malignant narcissistic
>>>>>>>> personality disorder..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So now that you've confirmed that my speculation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speculation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You weren't speculating, "steven", you've already admitted
>>>>>> that you've looked up the local court records. That you
>>>>>> refuse to say more of what you know indicates to me that
>>>>>> you know that you've already crossed the line and just
>>>>>> want some more attention for the narcissistic injury
>>>>>> that you've caused yourself so many times over the
>>>>>> years. That your psychopathy is degrading into the sort
>>>>>> of 'low-functioning' symptoms one could expect of a
>>>>>> fourth-grader with low self-esteem causes no surprise.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense, Mr. Lochner...I simply tossed it out there
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, you looked it up, because you're a stalker, as been
>>>> pointed out to me by a criminal psychologist that knows you..
>>>
>>> <CHUCKLES> Your imagination
>>
>>
>> There's no 'imagining' to it, and your denials strike me as odd..
>
> Well, you are pretty odd

Nah, just brighter than you could ever grasp..

>> When are you going to learn how to spell "society"?
>
> What's that silliness about

The way your follow-ups are always misspelled..

"alt.socirty.liberalism"

>>>> How's that 'gated community' you lived at doing these days?
>>>
>>> It's really not that big a deal
>>
>> Community service or is it a halfway house?
>
> That would be your choices

Nope, never had that problem..

>>>> Did you try to turn everyone against each other because
>>>> of your malignant narcissistic personality disorder, just
>>>> so you could enjoy all the discord you've caused, because
>>>> your own life is so miserable that you can help but cry
>>>> out for help in rather obvious ways?
>>>
>>> Projection much?
>>
>>
>> On your behalf, noted and logged, yatchingline and all..
>
> ??? you're getting odder all the time

Can't recall all of the lies you've told about yourself?


rhum...@yachtingmail.net
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:06:02 CDT

Hahahaha, oh yeah, I'm really bruised. I did drop $20K in the market
last week, but what the hell, the sunsets in the gulf where beautiful
enough to cheer me up and the boats Boze system makes Queen sound
really good.


How am I not surprised by that, "skipper"..

[Steve]

Does that bother you?

>>>>> How's that 'gated community' you lived at doing these days?
>>>>
>>>> It's really not that big a deal
>>>
>>> Community service or is it a halfway house?
>>
>> That would be your choices
>
>
>Nope, never had that problem..

So which of your felony charges did you serve time on?

>>>>> Did you try to turn everyone against each other because
>>>>> of your malignant narcissistic personality disorder, just
>>>>> so you could enjoy all the discord you've caused, because
>>>>> your own life is so miserable that you can help but cry
>>>>> out for help in rather obvious ways?
>>>>
>>>> Projection much?
>>>
>>>
>>> On your behalf, noted and logged, yatchingline and all..
>>
>> ??? you're getting odder all the time
>
>
>Can't recall all of the lies you've told about yourself?

Irony anyone?

>rhum...@yachtingmail.net
>Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:06:02 CDT
>
>Hahahaha, oh yeah, I'm really bruised. I did drop $20K in the market
>last week, but what the hell, the sunsets in the gulf where beautiful
>enough to cheer me up and the boats Boze system makes Queen sound
>really good.

That someone you think you know? I doubt it...

>How am I not surprised by that, "skipper"..

Here's another stupid claim from Zepp about the
Constitution.

"Incidently, the fact that the Constitution
specifies that people have right to vote in a
presidential election pretty much takes the choice of
having [a presidential election] out of the hands of
the states."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Sun, Sep 3 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/efb4fcac7b1561cb?hl=en&

...

>Canyon note> Today, Electors are chosen by popular
election, but the Constitution does not mandate a
popular election. The 14th Amendment does mention the
choosing of Electors, but is relevant only when
Electors are elected by popular vote. There is
similar mention in the 24th Amendment. In other
words, Electors could be appointed by a state's
legislature, or the legislature could empower the
governor to choose electors. In some cases, state
law allows for such appointments if the popular
vote cannot be used to determine a winner, such
as if election results are contested up to
federally-mandated deadlines.
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html

[Steve]

Naw, a bright person wouldn't be a liberal.

Transcript of Kurt Lochner Harrington admitting to being an alcoholic and a
dead-beat dad which leads to him being desperate to
manufacture unsupported nonsense (ie, <chuckle>)"something,
anything to attack me personally."

His problem here, of course, is that I have proof
whereas he has nothing.


Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:30:55 -0600

Canyon: "did the court let you settle for pennies on the
dollar?"


Lochner "Not that I'm aware of.. Did you have any other
petty remarks? "

Canyon: "did they see that your kids were better off if
you weren't in the picture? "

Lochner "Why don't you go and find out for yourself, cartoon
hero..
Oh, that's right, you can't find anything past that, no
child custody filings, no further hearings on the
settled account and discontinuence.. Poor little
cartoon hero..
You really are looking for something, anything to
attack me personally, with malice aforethought..
That'll be just another in a long series of mistakes
you've made today.."

Canyon: "...say, are you attending those AA meetings regularly?"

Lochner "Sure am, anything else you'd like to desperately try to
attack me personally with, or would you prefer to stop
now before you get into much more trouble?
--Or, do you just have nothing left to lose?"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/7171c5a4bd29de81?hl=en

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/10/2016 3:21 PM, Sneezed Crayon stepped in it again:

>
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:43:57 -0500, Kurt Lochner
> <kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/10/2016 3:58 AM, Sneezed Crayon foolishly back-pedaled again:
>>>
>>> On 7/9/2016 10:00 PM, Kurt Lochner was again amused by the denials of:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/9/2016 7:01 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled some more:
>>>>

>>>> When are you going to learn how to spell "society"?
>>>
>>> What's that silliness about
>>
>>
>> The way your follow-ups are always misspelled..
>>
>> "alt.socirty.liberalism"
>
> Does that bother you?

*>LOL!<* Keep squirming, you malignant narcissist..


Malignant narcissists aren’t always intellectual masterminds – many of
them are intellectually lazy. Rather than taking the time to carefully
consider a different perspective, they generalize anything and
everything you say, making blanket statements that don’t acknowledge the
nuances in your argument or take into account the multiple perspectives
you’ve paid homage to. Better yet, why not put a label on you that
dismisses your perspective altogether?

http://thoughtcatalog.com/shahida-arabi/2016/06/20-diversion-tactics-highly-manipulative-narcissists-sociopaths-and-psychopaths-use-to-silence-you/

--
Canyon <steven...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:11:30 GMT
news:<i4tp5v4c5ulhakvei...@4ax.com>

"I never made any claims I couldn't back up...."

..
Canyon <parkie...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:59:42 GMT
news:<rg6q5vgq29cerpocl...@4ax.com>

"I don't need to back anything up, you moron, cause unlike
yourself, my self image is not dependent on what others
think about me."

..

[Kurt Lochner]

Touched a nerve there, "skipper"?

--

[Steve]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:54:27 -0700 (PDT), Salty Stan
<wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 5:24:52 PM UTC-4, Steve wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:43:57 -0500, Kurt Lochner
>> <kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>

>ss

>> >
>> >Nah, just brighter than you could ever grasp..
>>
>> Naw, a bright person wouldn't be a liberal.
>

>They can be if they're crooked and/or have no moral character (i.e. the Clintons).
>
>But that's not Kurt, he's just an idiot.

well, actually I classify Lochner as a fool.

[Steve]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:39:35 -0700 (PDT), Salty Stan
<wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote:

>The democrats can harp on how ObamaCare is a success and that the economy is doing great, but in the real world, the average Joe can see his insurance now costs more or has been cancelled, and he and his family and friends see their wages deceasing, that is if they can even find a job.


Bottom feeders like Lochner now get subsidized insurance, so of course
they like it...

[Steve]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:58:04 -0500, Kurt Lochner

<kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On 7/10/2016 3:21 PM, Sneezed Crayon stepped in it again:
>>
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:43:57 -0500, Kurt Lochner
>> <kurt_l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/10/2016 3:58 AM, Sneezed Crayon foolishly back-pedaled again:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/9/2016 10:00 PM, Kurt Lochner was again amused by the denials of:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/9/2016 7:01 PM, Sneezed Crayon back-pedaled some more:
>>>>>
>>>>> When are you going to learn how to spell "society"?
>>>>
>>>> What's that silliness about
>>>
>>>
>>> The way your follow-ups are always misspelled..
>>>
>>> "alt.socirty.liberalism"
>>
>> Does that bother you?
>
>
>*>LOL!<* Keep squirming, you malignant narcissist..

<SHRG> Apparently that does bother Licknob..

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/11/2016 5:22 PM, Steve wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:54:27 -0700 (PDT), Salty Stan <wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> But that's not Kurt, he's just an idiot.
>
> well, actually I classify Lochner as a fool.

*>LOL!<* Keep squirming, you malignant narcissist..

Malignant narcissists aren’t always intellectual masterminds – many of
them are intellectually lazy. Rather than taking the time to carefully
consider a different perspective, they generalize anything and
everything you say, making blanket statements that don’t acknowledge the
nuances in your argument or take into account the multiple perspectives
you’ve paid homage to. Better yet, why not put a label on you that
dismisses your perspective altogether?

http://thoughtcatalog.com/shahida-arabi/2016/06/20-diversion-tactics-highly-manipulative-narcissists-sociopaths-and-psychopaths-use-to-silence-you/

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/11/2016 5:26 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> <SHRG> Apparently that does bother


*>LOL!<* Keep squirming, you malignant narcissist..

Malignant narcissists aren’t always intellectual masterminds – many of
them are intellectually lazy. Rather than taking the time to carefully
consider a different perspective, they generalize anything and
everything you say, making blanket statements that don’t acknowledge the
nuances in your argument or take into account the multiple perspectives
you’ve paid homage to. Better yet, why not put a label on you that
dismisses your perspective altogether?

http://thoughtcatalog.com/shahida-arabi/2016/06/20-diversion-tactics-highly-manipulative-narcissists-sociopaths-and-psychopaths-use-to-silence-you/


--

[jane.playne]

.

It's not just the bottom feeders. I know a wealthy retired individual
who manages the ratio of the draw from his taxable accounts vs his
nontaxable accounts to keep the taxable draws below $30,000 per year.
By keeping his taxable income to $30K, he receives the Obama insurance
subsidy.

[Steve]

Parasites come in all sizes...

[someone else]

So, did you ever get a response to that?

How about this?

In his research from St. Petersburg, Chen discovered that Russian
internet trolls — paid by the Kremlin to spread false information on the
internet — have been behind a number of "highly coordinated campaigns"
to deceive the American public.

It's a brand of information warfare, known as "dezinformatsiya," that
has been used by the Russians since at least the Cold War. The
disinformation campaigns are only one "active measure" tool used by
Russian intelligence to "sow discord among," and within, allies
perceived hostile to Russia.

"An active measure is a time-honored KGB tactic for waging informational
and psychological warfare," Michael Weiss, a senior editor at The Daily
Beast and editor-in-chief of The Interpreter — an online magazine that
translates and analyzes political, social, and economic events inside
the Russian Federation — wrote on Tuesday.

He continued (emphasis added):

"It is designed, as retired KGB General Oleg Kalugin once defined it,
'to drive wedges in the Western community alliances of all sorts,
particularly NATO, to sow discord among allies, to weaken the United
States in the eyes of the people in Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America,
and thus to prepare ground in case the war really occurs.' The most
common subcategory of active measures is dezinformatsiya, or
disinformation: feverish, if believable lies cooked up by Moscow Centre
and planted in friendly media outlets to make democratic nations look
sinister."

It is not surprising, then, that the Kremlin would pay internet trolls
to pose as Trump supporters and build him up online. In fact, that would
be the easy part.

From his interviews with former trolls employed by Russia, Chen
gathered that the point of their jobs "was to weave propaganda
seamlessly into what appeared to be the nonpolitical musings of an
everyday person."

http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-internet-trolls-and-donald-trump-2016-7


--
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance."
--John Stewart

[Kurt Lochner]

On 7/8/2016 8:48 PM, someone else wrote:
>
> On 7/8/2016 3:58 PM, Faulty Sham <wsjam...@gmail.com> whimpered:
>>
>> On 7/8/2016 3:49 PM, someone else was laughing, at the expense of:
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2016 11:14 AM, Faulty Sham <wsjam...@gmail.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> Weren't you going to tell us how great Obama is doing?
>>>
>>> Weren't you citing a discredited communist hedge fund blog?
>>>
>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-29/unmasking-the-men-behind-zero-hedge-wall-street-s-renegade-blog
...
>>> *>LOL!<* ..faulty slaphead..
>>
>> You are free to prove any of the facts presented in the charts incorrect.
>
> Most of the individual 'facts' appear to be correct, by themselves,
> but strung together in the manners presented by zerofudge, not so much..


Faulty Slaphead appears to be on 'vacation'..