Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Nightmare Scenario for Republicans: The Poor Getting WiFi

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Bret Cahill

unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 10:25:08 AM2/7/13
to
Computer aided communications is now far cheaper than food stamps.

So why do Republicans spend much more time torturing themselves with
the prospect Obama giving the poor WiFi than food stamps?

Without speaking the truth it's obvious Republicans know the truth:

All conservatism is based on censorship of economic information.

This is, BTW, why the legacy media, all don't-rock-the-boat
conservative, are a legacy of the pre info age. This is why the
legacy media were gush hyping free speech [for the poor] for naked
nazi flag burner parades and never economic issues.

When the poor use cell phones it ain't gonna be to discuss the
imPOOORtant flag burner issue.


Bret Cahill


"The freedom of the press and universal suffrage are, therefore,
entirely correlative whereas censorship and universal suffrage
contradict each other and cannot long coexist in the same institutions
of the same people."

-- Tocqueville

Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E

unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 10:53:18 AM2/7/13
to
Free Wi-Fi? For what? Ohh, I forgot. The taxpayers will be furnishng
every "poor" (aka Gimmeerat)household a desktop or/and laptop computer
so they can access their "free Wi-Fi". I think thats a good idea.
Within two weeks of Obama giving out free computers, I'll be able to
go to any pawn shop and pick up a high end gamer for pennies on the
dollar. I say good on Obama.

Todd Mullen

unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 7:14:55 PM2/7/13
to
An ultra-left LOSER. Like most socially misfit DemocRATs, Bret lives
alone in a one-room apartment:

Bret E. Cahill (56+)
649 Main St, Apt 226
Brawley, CA 92227

Bret tried to sue the gov't and got stomped on like an insect. Ever
since that crushing humiliation he has hated himself, everybody else,
and America.

BRET E. CAHILL, PETITIONER
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ET AL....
CONCLUSION
The petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
http://www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1995/w951444w.txt

Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you encourage them to
continue lying.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:11:54 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>The GOP convention came and went with no bounce for Mitt.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Romney takes lead over Obama with convention "bounce": Reuters/Ipsos
poll
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/30/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE87T1DV20120830

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

Dare

unread,
Feb 9, 2013, 9:49:04 AM2/9/13
to
"Bret Cahill" <Bret_E...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:30be2b49-1aab-4408...@d11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> All conservatism is based on censorship of economic information.
>

Which economic information?
There does seem to be legitimate disagreement about what
works best for a particular economic/political situation..
Does a changing ...now "global"....economy need a change in
economic theory?

What would T say about Democracy in America today?

Bret Cahill

unread,
Feb 9, 2013, 1:56:37 PM2/9/13
to
> > All conservatism is based on censorship of economic information.
>
> Which economic information?

Anything necessary for a free marketry economy.

> There does seem to be legitimate disagreement about what
> works best for a particular economic/political situation..
> Does a changing ...now "global"....economy need a change in
> economic theory?

What's the old theory?

Free marketry w/o free speech?

> What would T say about Democracy in America today?

He'd be saying what he said 25 years after publishing the work:

I told you so.


Bret Cahill


Dare

unread,
Feb 9, 2013, 2:31:15 PM2/9/13
to
On 2/9/2013 1:56 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>
>> What would T say about Democracy in America today?
>
> He'd be saying what he said 25 years after publishing the work:
>
> I told you so.
>
> Bret Cahill

Great response!
and probably all too appropriate.

Audra C. Shepherd

unread,
Feb 9, 2013, 7:09:52 PM2/9/13
to
An ultra-left LOSER. Like most socially misfit DemocRATs, Bret lives
alone in a one-room apartment:

Bret E. Cahill (56+)
649 Main St, Apt 226
Brawley, CA 92227

Bret tried to sue the gov't and got stomped on like an insect. Ever
since that crushing humiliation he has hated himself, everybody else,
and America.

BRET E. CAHILL, PETITIONER
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ET AL....
CONCLUSION
The petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
http://www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/1995/w951444w.txt

Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you encourage them to
continue lying.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:00:24 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>Taxes were too low and interest rates were too high which is what
>caused the stagflation.

Oops! CAUGHT LYING, again...

Stagflation is an economic situation in which inflation and economic
stagnation occur simultaneously and remain unchecked for a significant
period of time.

Economists offer two principal explanations for why stagflation
occurs. First, stagflation can result when an economy is slowed by an
unfavorable supply shock, such as an increase in the price of oil in
an oil importing country, which tends to raise prices at the same time
that it slows the economy by making production less profitable. This
type of stagflation presents a policy dilemma because most actions to
assist with fighting inflation worsen economic stagnation and vice
versa. Second, both stagnation and inflation can result from
inappropriate macroeconomic policies. For example, central banks can
cause inflation by permitting excessive growth of the money supply,
and the government can cause stagnation by excessive regulation of
goods markets and labor markets. Together, these factors can cause
stagflation; equally, either can, if taken to such an extreme that it
must be reversed. Both types of explanations are offered in analyses
of the global stagflation of the 1970s: it began with a huge rise in
oil prices, but then continued as central banks used excessively
stimulative monetary policy to counteract the resulting recession,
causing a runaway wage-price spiral.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation
0 new messages