American Left and America's Enemies = Same thing - SF Chronicle
_ArKLyte
www.chronwatch.com
12/4/02
Cinnamon Stillwell
America has been hit with a barrage of tapes, letters and general
ranting from our foes over the past few weeks. Saddam Hussein and his
henchmen sent several indignant letters our way and we received an
alleged recording of Osama bin Laden’s voice, as well as another
letter, supposedly from the same source. Both were filled with the
type of fanatical rhetoric we’ve grown accustomed to hearing from
al-Quaeda.
While reading the transcripts of some of these less than friendly
communications, it occurred to me that I had heard many of the phrases
before, but from an entirely different source. In fact, the
terminology was eerily similar to that used by the American left.
Hatred of America, Israel and Western Civilization is something the
left, Islamofascists and Arab dictators appear to have in common.
Let’s compare some of the statements made by both parties on various
subjects and let the language speak for itself.
(For the sake of brevity, Osama bin Laden is “OBL,” and the various
letters from the Iraqi government are simply labeled “Iraq,” unless
they’re more specific. As for my sources from amongst the
liberal/left, they are identified by name, organization and/or
publication.)
On the Bush Administration:
OBL:
“the criminal gang in the White House”
“the White House gangsters are the biggest butchers of this age”
“the tyrannical U.S. government”
“oppressive American government”
Not in Our Name:
“These Asses Of Evil”
[They] “deliver a gangster style message”
Iraq:
“the tyrant of the age”
“the gang of evil”
“American administration's evil to its fullest extent”
John Pilger:
“George W Bush's mafia diplomacy”
On Oil:
Saddam Hussein:
“ the issue is tied to evil designs to dominate the world and control
Middle Eastern resources and oil. “
International Socialist Organization:
“This war is not about "fighting terrorism," but about seizing control
of Middle East oil”
OBL:
“You steal our wealth and oil at paltry prices because of your
international influence and military threats.”
Robert Scheer at The Nation:
“there is no plausible national security reason for pushing for war
with Iraq at this time, other than the ill-advised imperial goal of
directly controlling the world's oil supplies.”
Not in Our Name:
“spilling blood for oil and global domination”
“no more transfusions of blood for oil”
On Iraq, the sanctions and fuzzy math:
Iraq (official government web site):
More than 567,000 children in Iraq have died as a consequence of the
decade-long embargo.
Francis Boyle in CounterPunch:
“President George Bush and the United States of America...committing
the international crime of genocide against The 4.5 Million Children
of Iraq”
OBL:
“It is a wonder that more than 1.5 million Iraqi children have died as
a result of your sanctions...”
ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and Racism):
“...economic sanctions...which has caused the deaths of over one
million people, primarily children.”
On Israel:
OBL:
“The creation and continuation of Israel is one of the greatest
crimes...”
Noam Chomsky:
“Israel's brutal military occupation...and other actions that are
recognized as crimes throughout most of the world...”
Iraq:
“...put an end to Zionist occupation of Palestine, and other occupied
Arab territories...”
Alexander Cockburn:
“....Israel is a racist state whose obvious and provable intent is to
continue to steal Palestinian land, oppress Palestinians, herd them
into smaller and smaller enclaves, and in all likelihood ultimately
drive them into the sea...”
OBL:
“The creation of Israel is a crime which must be erased.”
League for the Revolutionary Workers Party:
“...the co-existence of the Zionist state and any kind of a
Palestinian state is impossible.”
After comparing these statements, it’s hard to detect any real
difference between the American left and America’s enemies. Of course,
the left would simply claim the right of free speech in their defense,
but this goes way beyond free speech or civil liberties. The problem
with the left is that they don't know where dissent ends and treason
begins.
=====================================================================
Want to know why Muslims have made a *fatal* misjudgement of
America? Take a few minutes and read this excellent article.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_1_why_the_muslims.html
=====================================================================
§K¥ Wå£K€®
>After comparing these statements, it’s hard to detect any real
>difference between the American left and America’s enemies.
you know, al capone said a lot of sensible things in his day...and
sometimes george bush's rhetoric actually makes sense (not that often,
but you get the point).
it just so happens that liberals are about more than rhetoric...its
about acting out of compassion, the spirit of giving, taking the time
to learn, and understand what is unfamiliar, and using conscience as
your moral guidepost.
and yes, rejecting the obvious contradictions, selfishness, arrogance
and aggression of much of the u.s.'s foreign policy.
s.w.
Kilroy911
even CHEAPER!
Now correct me or not but wasn't it these people that were saying
that "THE UNITED STATES WILL BE DESTROYED"....and soon?
So if we're going to be destroyed then why all the ranting and
raving? I mean what is the purpose of ranting at a country that
is going to be destroyed....and soon?
As to the comments they are well used and as unsuccessful as
they ever were in the past. Yeah right! If we wanted to take over
the world we would have done it after WWII when we had over a
million man standing army, 114 Air Craft Carriers, the biggest
Navy before or since AND the only country with the NUCLEAR
BOMB. But instead WE WENT HOME!!!
The Communists told their people that we wanted to destroy the
USSR so they needed a huge military. But what happened after
the Communists fell? Did we invade? Did we take over Russian?
No we opened TRADE TALKS. Invited Putnin to George's ranch
for a pony ride. And you know what? We did not even assassinate him
when we had the chance. Oh Yeah WE EVIL!
When we were pulling out of SVN did we nuke Ho Chi Min and his
communist buddies? Nope.
After Desert Storm did we drive on in and kill Saddam and take
over Iraq's oil? Nope. (And I for one think that was immensely stupid
move. He shoulda had his head blown off. If we had we would not be
having the current problem.)
After WWII did we go in and kill the Japanese emperor and set up
a puppet government controlled by us? No we set up a democracy
and now they have full self rule. Did we cut up Germany and give
some to each of the surrounding allies? Nope. Germany now again
has full democratic self rule and is again united. Why is it that we
are such GOOD ENEMIES. We never asked for one cent in compensation
for Germany and Japan starting the war and the millions killed.
When Saddam had to abandon Kuwait did he go gracefully? Nope.
He practiced SCORCHED EARTH!!! When has the US ever done the
same? NEVER!!! And we are the "GREAT SATAN"? Oh yeah we
EVIL!!!
Yeah Yeah I know everyone is going to bring up Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
But the truth is the destruction of those two cities saved far more
lives than they took. The Japanese were gearing up for a HOUSE TO
HOUSE BATTLE (sound familiar?). That would have cost far more in
lives then those 2 bombs and would have destroyed the Japanese
economy and it's industrial centers. Forcing an end to that war was
the best thing that ever happened to Japan. Otherwise their cities
would have been leveled by carpet bombing like they were in Germany
and probably MILLIONS of civilians would have been killed. Far more
than died in those two cities.
So they can say what they like. But the truth is that HISTORY EXPOSES
THEM FOR THE LIARS THEY ARE. And any EDUCATED person that
knows history knows that to be true.
Kilroy911!!! (The Raving Moderate!!!)
_ArKLyte
>it just so happens that liberals are about more than rhetoric
And, of course, that is scary as hell to a majority of American voters.
You lost. Get over it.
wf...@ptnospam.com
>If It Walks Like a Duck...
>
>www.chronwatch.com
>12/4/02
>Cinnamon Stillwell
>
>
>America has been hit with a barrage of tapes, letters and general
>ranting from our foes over the past few weeks. Saddam Hussein and his
>henchmen sent several indignant letters our way and we received an
>alleged recording of Osama bin Laden’s voice, as well as another
>letter, supposedly from the same source. Both were filled with the
>type of fanatical rhetoric we’ve grown accustomed to hearing from
>al-Quaeda.
>
>While reading the transcripts of some of these less than friendly
>communications, it occurred to me that I had heard many of the phrases
>before, but from an entirely different source. In fact, the
>terminology was eerily similar to that used by the American left.
of course, the american right...joe sobran, pat buchanan...are also
anti-semitic and hate america's policy in the middle east...
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
"K WK?" <asky...@rebeloutpost.org> wrote in message
news:p0mtuu0rj4b6c20g6...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:14:46 -0600, _ArKLyte <_ArK...@Now.Net> wrote:
>
> >After comparing these statements, it's hard to detect any real
> >difference between the American left and America's enemies.
>
>
> you know, al capone said a lot of sensible things in his day...and
> sometimes george bush's rhetoric actually makes sense (not that often,
> but you get the point).
That 'is' like saying Saddamn and Clinton both enjoy the pleasures of
cigars.
>
> it just so happens that liberals are about more than rhetoric...its
> about acting out of compassion, the spirit of giving, taking the time
> to learn, and understand what is unfamiliar, and using conscience as
> your moral guidepost.
This is the first time I've ever hear the words, "spirit of giving" from a
lib. I associate libs with the words, "what our welfare state can do for
you".
>
> and yes, rejecting the obvious contradictions, selfishness, arrogance
> and aggression of much of the u.s.'s foreign policy.
There's that negitivity again.
First comes the sugar, then comes the bunch, like Al Gore saying, "I plan to
expand the highway system while cutting oil supply".
>
> s.w.
Ninure Saunders
-On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:14:46 -0600, _ArKLyte <_ArK...@Now.Net> wrote:
-
->If It Walks Like a Duck...
->
->www.chronwatch.com
->12/4/02
->Cinnamon Stillwell
->
->
->America has been hit with a barrage of tapes, letters and general
->ranting from our foes over the past few weeks. Saddam Hussein and his
->henchmen sent several indignant letters our way and we received an
->alleged recording of Osama bin Laden’s voice, as well as another
->letter, supposedly from the same source. Both were filled with the
->type of fanatical rhetoric we’ve grown accustomed to hearing from
->al-Quaeda.
->
->While reading the transcripts of some of these less than friendly
->communications, it occurred to me that I had heard many of the phrases
->before, but from an entirely different source. In fact, the
->terminology was eerily similar to that used by the American left.
-
-of course, the american right...joe sobran, pat buchanan...are also
-anti-semitic and hate america's policy in the middle east...
But such sentiments are only "bad" when expressed by the "left"...
I mean trhe fact that here are fight-ringers adovating the the violent
overthrow of the Federal Govement, expressing amiration for the bravery of
those who committed the 9/11 attacks, is something that the right will
defend in a heartbeat..but let anyone not on the right simpjy
QUESTION...and the right scrams for their death.
Curious.
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://www.geocities.com/ninure
The world's second most subversive document
http://www.geocities.com/ninure/declaration.html
-
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.ufmcc.com
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
_ArKLyte
>here are fight-ringers adovating the the violent
>overthrow of the Federal Govement, expressing amiration for the bravery of
>those who committed the 9/11 attacks,
Surely you couldn't be this pathetically stupid.
Brain Death
Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan are about the only members of the
anti-Semitic club who can be characterized as also part of the
American right; however Buchanan is off on his own planet really and
Sobran still thinks he's discovered the missing Shakespeare plays.
BD
Ninure Saunders
-On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:07:08 GMT, RainbowChri...@hotmail.com
(Ninure Saunders) wrote:
-
->here are right-ringers adovating the the violent
->overthrow of the Federal Govement, expressing amiration for the bravery of
->those who committed the 9/11 attacks,
-
-Surely you couldn't be this pathetically stupid.
No, but you are.
http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/6634
Aryans For 9/11
An Excerpt From The Terrorist Next Door, Pulitzer Prize Nominee
Daniel Levitas lives in Atlanta, Georgia, has written widely about racist,
anti-Semitic, and neo-Nazi groups and has testified as an expert witness
in American and Canadian courts since 1986. He has worked throughout the
U.S. with civil rights, religious and community groups and government
agencies seeking to respond to bias crimes and hate group activity.
Editor's Note: The Terrorist Next Door is published by Thomas Dunne
Books/St. Martin's Press. This excerpt is reprinted with permission.
This is part two in a three-part series of excerpts from Levitas' upcoming
book The Terrorist Next Door: The Militia Movement And The Radical Right,
to be published in November by Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press.
Click here for part one.
"Hallelu-Yahweh! May the WAR be started! DEATH to His enemies, may the
World Trade Center BURN TO THE GROUND!... We can blame no others than
ourselves for our problems due to the fact that we allow... Satan's
children, called jews (sic) today, to have dominion over our lives... My
suggestion to all brethren, if we are left alone, sit back and watch the
death throws (sic) of this Babylonian beast system and later we can get
involved in clean up operations. If this beast system looks to us to
plunder, arrest and fill their detention camps with, then by all means
fight force with force and leave not a man standing!"
- "Pastor" August B. Kries, III Sheriff's Posse Comitatus
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, focused America's attention
on threats from abroad but even as the World Trade Center towers were
collapsing, right wing hate groups were celebrating in the United States.
"WONDERFUL NEWS BROTHERS!!" exulted Hardy Lloyd, the Pittsburgh
coordinator of the racist, anti-Semitic World Church of the Creator. In an
e-mail message to supporters throughout western Pennsylvania, Lloyd crowed
that "Maybe as many as 10,000 Zoggites (sic) are dead" and he invoked the
promise of vigilante street violence. "The war is upon us all, time to get
shooting lone wolves!! [September 11th] is a wonderful day for us all...
Let's kick some Jew ass."
A call to the domestic terrorism unit of the local FBI drew a blank as
neither Lloyd or his group were familiar to the Special Agent fielding
calls, despite the fact that just four months earlier, outgoing FBI
director Louis J. Freeh had told the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence that "formal right-wing hate groups, such as the World Church
of the Creator and the Aryan Nations, represent a continuing terrorist
threat." Like others on the radical right, Lloyd simultaneously praised
and vilified the Al Qaeda terrorists. "My only concern is that we Aryans
didn't do this and that the rag-heads are ahead of us on the Lone Wolf
point scale." Other neo-Nazis called the attackers "towel heads" and "sand
niggers," yet hailed them as, "very brave people [who] were willing to die
for whatever they believed in."
"We may not want them marrying our daughters... But anyone who is willing
to drive a plane into a building to kill jews (sic) is alright by me. I
wish our members had half as much testicular fortitude," observed Billy
Roper, the deputy membership coordinator of the neo-Nazi National
Alliance. Other militants joined in the call to arms. "[T]he current
events in Jew York city (sic) have caused me to activate my unit,"
announced Paul R. Mullet, the Minnesota leader of the Aryan Nations. "We
are preparing to strike here in Minnesota and other surrounding areas.
Please be advised that the time for ALL ARYANS TO ATTACK IS NOW NOT LATER.
Our opportunity may never be the same," (emphasis in the original).
Inspired by the fiction of the racist terror novel, The Turner Diaries,
and various real-life martyrs of the white supremacist movement,
anti-Semites like Mullet may have been hoping to realize their
long-awaited dream of overthrowing the Zionist Occupied Government, but in
the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, the targets of vigilante violence
were not Jews, but Arabs and others mistaken for Middle Easterners. In the
10 weeks following 9/11, the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
reported more than 500 violent incidents including simple assault, arson,
shootings and at least half-a-dozen murders. The FBI investigated
approximately 250 hate crimes. In Phoenix, a man went on a shooting
rampage, killing a 49-year-old Sikh and firing at a Lebanese-American gas
station clerk. In San Diego, two men on a motorcycle yanked open the car
door of a woman they mistakenly thought was of Arab descent and slashed
her in the head. In the Chicago suburb of Bridgeview, on each of the three
nights following 9/11, hundreds of mostly white youths chanting "USA!
USA!" and waving American and Confederate flags marched on a local mosque
while white supremacists distributed literature and worked the crowd.
Police in riot gear turned them back.
Predictably there was plenty of encouragement from the right. "Dirty
Rotten Arabs and Muslims," proclaimed the Web site of the Council of
Conservative Citizens -- a group once endorsed by former U.S. Senate
Majority Leader Trent Lott, who was even a Council member. "Arab treachery
and deviousness have been a scourge since biblical times," the group
advised.
Bigotry and intolerance were not limited to criminals, mobs and hate
groups. In Georgia, U.S. Representative Saxby Chambliss, Chairman of the
House Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security suggested that the
Sheriff of Lowndes County be "turn[ed] loose" to "arrest every Muslim that
crosses the state line." And in Louisiana, Rep. John Cooksey called for
racial profiling of anyone wearing "a diaper on his head and a fan belt
wrapped around the diaper."
The hardened rightists and thuggish blowhards who cheered the attacks of
9/11 did so for several reasons, not the least of which was that they
relished the sight of mass destruction in the heart of what the Posse's
August Kries termed "the Babylonian Beast system" that was "Jew York."
Like 19th century populists who often railed against urban America in an
anti-Semitic vein, the haters of today despise New York for its racial,
ethnic, sexual and religious diversity. The devastation at the Pentagon
was welcomed for creating pain and confusion in the nation's capitol,
regarded as enemy-occupied territory by the radical right. Their hopes for
stimulating widespread disorder waned quickly however, when it became
clear that the attack was going to prompt more aggressive surveillance of
dissidents, including, possibly, them.
"The Feds are clamping down with the definition of a domestic terrorist,"
warned Christopher R. Kennney, the "Commander" of the Republic of Texas, a
Posse-type group whose original leaders were serving long prison terms for
earlier crimes. "I am sure there will be even more restrictions coming
down the pike. We must prepare while we can." August Kries of the Posse
Comitatus was more direct: "There has been much talk lately of exchanging
Freedom for security by this treasonous federal beast system. We will NOT
blindly be led down the road to their jew (sic) World Order totalitarian
government... if this so-called security is forced on us we would rather
FIGHT and RESIST ALL TYRANNY than surrender as subjects and slaves!"
In addition to praising the carnage, many right wing leaders pitched a
message they hoped might reach beyond their usual audience. The attacks of
September 11 "are in need of a fervent and immediate response by White
Racial Loyalists everywhere," explained Matthew Hale, 30, the leader of
the World Church of the Creator. Supporters need to "preach... [about] the
control of the United States government by International Jewry and its
lackeys. Perhaps never before have our people been so receptive to our
message," Hale observed.
The late William Pierce agreed. In an Internet radio broadcast on
September 22, the author of The Turner Diaries claimed that America was
attacked "because we have been letting ourselves be used to do all of
Israel's dirty work in the Middle East." Pierce's group, the National
Alliance, distilled this message into a flyer that pictured the
disintegrating towers and asked the rhetorical question, "Is our
involvement in the Security of the Jewish State Worth This?"
David Duke, the former Klansman who had won 607,000 votes 10 years earlier
in his unsuccessful quest to become a U.S. Senator from Louisiana,
denounced the "ultra-powerful Jewish lobby" after 9/11 and explained that
"Zionists caused the attack America endured just as surely as if they
themselves had piloted those planes." Duke denounced Jews as an "insidious
media influence that has pushed white guilt and racial miscegenation."
Echoing the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories widely accepted by the Arab
press throughout the world after 9/11, Duke also suggested "even if
Israeli agents were not the actual provocateurs behind the operation, at
the very least they had prior knowledge."
Not content to scapegoat Israel and the Jews, many on the radical right -
as well as numerous mainstream conservatives - blamed the tragedy on what
they called America's "open door" policy on immigration, and the nation's
embrace of pluralism.
Such comments would never win the support of a majority of Americans, but
that is not what they were designed to do. With one out of every five
people holding unfavorable views toward Israel and 22 percent saying the
attack on the United States would not have occurred if the two countries
were not such close allies, the right wing line was shrewdly calibrated to
bring in new recruits. A June 2002, poll by the Anti-Defamation League
identified approximately 35 million adults (fully 17 percent of the
population -- up from 12 percent measured some eight months earlier) as
"most anti-Semitic."
Not content to scapegoat Israel and the Jews, many on the radical right --
as well as numerous mainstream conservatives -- blamed the tragedy on what
they called America's "open door" policy on immigration, and the nation's
embrace of pluralism. "America is now drinking the bitter dregs of
multiculturalism and diversity," explained the Council of Conservative
Citizens on its Web site, along with an essay blaming the September 11
attacks on Abraham Lincoln and America's "[sinful] religion of equality
and unity." And according to David Duke, "If the demographics of America
were still the same as in the 1960's we would be absolutely secure."
--
--
FAIR USE NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
_ArKLyte
>In article <kf3vuuoenrk38kcn3...@4ax.com>, _ArK...@Now.Net wrote:
>
>-On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:07:08 GMT, RainbowChri...@hotmail.com
>(Ninure Saunders) wrote:
>-
>->here are right-ringers adovating the the violent
>->overthrow of the Federal Govement, expressing amiration for the bravery of
>->those who committed the 9/11 attacks,
>-
>-Surely you couldn't be this pathetically stupid.
>
>
>No, but you are.
>
>http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/6634
>
>Aryans For 9/11
>An Excerpt From The Terrorist Next Door, Pulitzer Prize Nominee
>
>Daniel Levitas lives in Atlanta, Georgia, has written widely about racist,
>anti-Semitic, and neo-Nazi groups and has testified as an expert witness
>in American and Canadian courts since 1986. He has worked throughout the
>U.S. with civil rights, religious and community groups and government
>agencies seeking to respond to bias crimes and hate group activity.
Ma'am I can assure you that all 'right-wingers' are members of
white supremacist groups.
Try again.
_ArKLyte
>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 20:16:52 GMT, RainbowChri...@hotmail.com (Ninure Saunders) wrote:
>
>>In article <kf3vuuoenrk38kcn3...@4ax.com>, _ArK...@Now.Net wrote:
>>
>>-On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:07:08 GMT, RainbowChri...@hotmail.com
>>(Ninure Saunders) wrote:
>>-
>>->here are right-ringers adovating the the violent
>>->overthrow of the Federal Govement, expressing amiration for the bravery of
>>->those who committed the 9/11 attacks,
>>-
>>-Surely you couldn't be this pathetically stupid.
>>
>>
>>No, but you are.
>>
>>http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/6634
>>
>>Aryans For 9/11
>>An Excerpt From The Terrorist Next Door, Pulitzer Prize Nominee
>>
>>Daniel Levitas lives in Atlanta, Georgia, has written widely about racist,
>>anti-Semitic, and neo-Nazi groups and has testified as an expert witness
>>in American and Canadian courts since 1986. He has worked throughout the
>>U.S. with civil rights, religious and community groups and government
>>agencies seeking to respond to bias crimes and hate group activity.
>
>Ma'am I can assure you that all 'right-wingers' are members of
>white supremacist groups.
>
>Try again.
BIG OOPS!!
Ma'am I can assure you that all 'right-wingers' are NOT members of
white supremacist groups.
Whew .. :)
wf...@ptnospam.com
wrote:
IOW the right is not anti-semitic until it is.
_ArKLyte
Ariel Sharon recently called the Bush administration
" ..the best friend that Israel ever had".
Did he say that because the 'right' is anti-semitic?
I think you should quit while you're behind, but
feel free to be humiliated over and over and over.
wf...@ptnospam.com
>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 00:18:38 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:38:47 GMT, Brain Death <jgl...@letsroll.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 06:22:40 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>of course, the american right...joe sobran, pat buchanan...are also
>>>>anti-semitic and hate america's policy in the middle east...
>>>
>>>Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan are about the only members of the
>>>anti-Semitic club who can be characterized as also part of the
>>>American right;
>>
>>IOW the right is not anti-semitic until it is.
>
>Ariel Sharon recently called the Bush administration
>" ..the best friend that Israel ever had".
>
guess you just dont read about the american right.
no shame in being illiterate. your shame is that you're proud of it.
dmtsymphony
Israelis and Palestinians.They are both semitic.
wf...@ptnospam.com
wrote:
>Once again, the term anti-semitic is misused, as it refers to both
>Israelis and Palestinians.They are both semitic.
>
as nye bevin once said, far be it from me to deter you in the sterile
application of your fanatical logic.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
>
>And, of course, that is scary as hell to a majority of American voters.
i know...most people are happy with just the rhetoric...if politicians
actually want to improve things, and force people to change, it makes
them crap in their diapers.
>
>You lost. Get over it.
we all lost, you just don't realize it yet.
s.w.
Brain Death
Let me know when you see a Republican posting anti-Semitic stuff in
this newsgroup. Then compare that to Snakehawk, Rocky & Bullwinkle,
bushsucks, analyst41, Skywalker "-", and numerous other leftwing
posters who routinely talk about the Jew-controlled media and
congress. You will NOT see a Republican posting hateful crap like
this but you will see it all over the place from the DEMOCRATS.
BD
§K¥ Wå£K€®
wrote:
do you have a problem with the fact that most of our country's media
outlets (i.e. newspapers, hollywood movie producers and television
execs.) are jewish? do you deny it?
s.w.
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
"§K¥ Wå£K?®" <asky...@rebeloutpost.org> wrote in message
news:4mk0vukutqs5rgfk1...@4ax.com...
No, the people own because the we now don't have to change to the dictates
of social welfare which though taxes feed illegal immigrants and populist
agenda's that only expand government services.
America own because Conservatism will cut out 700, 000 government jobs,
relieving the burden on tax payers, ending incremental socialism.
The people won because history has proven, after democrat presidencies,
trickle down legacies are always 'hell to pay'.
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
My step-mother is from Vietnamese, her family pooled their money together
after getting settled in the new world and bought a used shrimp boat back in
the 70's. You may have heard the story on 60 Minutes. Their all millionaires
today.
Smart people use money, not their backs. People that hate Jews probably hate
the Vietnamese too because of envy for what they do with family recourses,
like but their children through college. After a few generations, the
momentom of success may be profound, in the class of Nobel.
Look what Islam has done to squander what oil revenue has brought them.
What has your family done with their money?
CB
_ArKLyte
>On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:28:25 -0600, _ArKLyte <_ArK...@Now.Net> wrote:
>
>>
>>And, of course, that is scary as hell to a majority of American voters.
>
>i know...most people are happy with just the rhetoric...if politicians
>actually want to improve things, and force people to change, it makes
>them crap in their diapers.
>>
You, see, that is your problem. You WANT the gov't to 'force' people
to change. The republicans want to ensure that the gov't doesn't force
people to do anything.
People don't like to be 'forced'.
Go burn a flag or something.
Brain Death
There are Jews at or near the top of most businesses and professions.
So what? It's not as if this is surprising; they are known for their
tight family structure and their emphasis on education, which means
they will get ahead in life. Do we have Jew-controlled medical and
legal professions? No, but there sure are a lot of Jewish doctors and
lawyers out there.
In twenty years you're going to be talking about the Asian-dominated
media.
BD
§K¥ Wå£K€®
<C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
>America own because Conservatism will cut out 700, 000 government jobs,
>relieving the burden on tax payers, ending incremental socialism.
>
not cut out, farmed out to unscrupulous private suppliers...who will
only be forced to be accountable to the american people after years
and years of unproductive lawsuits.
>The people won because history has proven, after democrat presidencies,
>trickle down legacies are always 'hell to pay'.
>
in other words, they don't ever really trickle down, and the poor get
poorer, while the rich get richer, and more decadent.
s.w.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
>You, see, that is your problem. You WANT the gov't to 'force' people
>to change. The republicans want to ensure that the gov't doesn't force
>people to do anything.
>
>People don't like to be 'forced'.
yeah, especially rich people who hate having to be held accountable
for their unscupulous actions.
s.w.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
wrote:
if asians then dominate the media, you're right.
s.w.
_ArKLyte
I'm not rich, and I don't want to be forced either.
Does that count?
666
>
> _ArKLyte <_ArK...@Now.Net> wrote:
>
> >
> >And, of course, that is scary as hell to a majority of American voters.
>
> i know...most people are happy with just the rhetoric...if politicians
> actually want to improve things, and force people to change, it makes
> them crap in their diapers.
> >
> >You lost. Get over it.
>
> we all lost, you just don't realize it yet.
Oh really? Then why is my salary higher than ever, my mortgage APR
lowest, my house appreciated a whopping 50,000 and I have investments
like never before? allah akbar for that kind of loss!
(ps. and that's only the monetary aspect of , because it's easiest to
quantify, not because it's most important.)
§K¥ Wå£K€®
>I'm not rich, and I don't want to be forced either.
>Does that count?
and people in general that hold antiquated, narrow minded
views....sorry, i forgot that part.
s.w.
wf...@ptnospam.com
wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 00:18:38 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:38:47 GMT, Brain Death <jgl...@letsroll.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 06:22:40 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>of course, the american right...joe sobran, pat buchanan...are also
>>>>anti-semitic and hate america's policy in the middle east...
>>>
>>>Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan are about the only members of the
>>>anti-Semitic club who can be characterized as also part of the
>>>American right;
>>
>>IOW the right is not anti-semitic until it is.
>
>Let me know when you see a Republican posting anti-Semitic stuff in
>this newsgroup.
irrelevant. few people in this newsgroup make national policy.
antisemites on the right DO.
Then compare that to Snakehawk, Rocky & Bullwinkle,
>bushsucks, analyst41, Skywalker "-", and numerous other leftwing
>posters who routinely talk about the Jew-controlled media and
>congress. You will NOT see a Republican posting hateful crap like
>this but you will see it all over the place from the DEMOCRATS.
>
again, irrelevant. this newsgroup is not the issue.
wf...@ptnospam.com
<asky...@rebeloutpost.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:54:58 GMT, Brain Death <jgl...@letsroll.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Let me know when you see a Republican posting anti-Semitic stuff in
>>this newsgroup. Then compare that to Snakehawk, Rocky & Bullwinkle,
>>bushsucks, analyst41, Skywalker "-", and numerous other leftwing
>>posters who routinely talk about the Jew-controlled media and
>>congress. You will NOT see a Republican posting hateful crap like
>>this but you will see it all over the place from the DEMOCRATS.
>>
>>BD
>
>
>do you have a problem with the fact that most of our country's media
>outlets (i.e. newspapers, hollywood movie producers and television
>execs.) are jewish? do you deny it?
>
>s.w.
he doesnt have to.
i do.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
>
>he doesnt have to.
>
>i do.
o.k. you silly man. go ahead and post for us the top executives of
all the networks, all the media production companies, and all the
newpaper heads of staff, and show us which are, and aren't jewish.
lets see you do some work to back up your contention.
s.w.
Brain Death
>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:54:58 GMT, Brain Death <jgl...@letsroll.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 00:18:38 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:38:47 GMT, Brain Death <jgl...@letsroll.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 06:22:40 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>of course, the american right...joe sobran, pat buchanan...are also
>>>>>anti-semitic and hate america's policy in the middle east...
>>>>
>>>>Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan are about the only members of the
>>>>anti-Semitic club who can be characterized as also part of the
>>>>American right;
>>>
>>>IOW the right is not anti-semitic until it is.
>>
>>Let me know when you see a Republican posting anti-Semitic stuff in
>>this newsgroup.
>
>irrelevant. few people in this newsgroup make national policy.
>antisemites on the right DO.
Like Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran?
> Then compare that to Snakehawk, Rocky & Bullwinkle,
>>bushsucks, analyst41, Skywalker "-", and numerous other leftwing
>>posters who routinely talk about the Jew-controlled media and
>>congress. You will NOT see a Republican posting hateful crap like
>>this but you will see it all over the place from the DEMOCRATS.
>>
>again, irrelevant. this newsgroup is not the issue.
I thought your party was the one where ideas percolate up from the
bottom, instead of being imposed from the top down like the
Republicans.
BD
wf...@ptnospam.com
sorry sport. thats why logic isnt for bigots.
you see, aristotle long ago found that those who make an assertion are
bound to prove it. it's not up to me to do your homework, my little
hooded, cross burning friend.
that's why bigotry dies. because morons like you are just too stupid
to think.
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
Haven't you any ambition? Are you so poor that the rich, including your boss
are so out of reach of your goals? Or have you none?
wf...@ptnospam.com
wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 22:19:08 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>
>>
>>irrelevant. few people in this newsgroup make national policy.
>>antisemites on the right DO.
>
>Like Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran?
you bet.
>
>> Then compare that to Snakehawk, Rocky & Bullwinkle,
>>>bushsucks, analyst41, Skywalker "-", and numerous other leftwing
>>>posters who routinely talk about the Jew-controlled media and
>>>congress. You will NOT see a Republican posting hateful crap like
>>>this but you will see it all over the place from the DEMOCRATS.
>>>
>>again, irrelevant. this newsgroup is not the issue.
>
>I thought your party was the one where ideas percolate up from the
>bottom, instead of being imposed from the top down like the
>Republicans.
for republicans there is only the top. everyone else is a peasant.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
bigotry is alive and well, trust me. for this reason, it wasn't too
hard to find an ample amount of sites that aid me in illustrating your
vast and what must be pretended ignorance (i'm assuming no one that
has survived to adulthood could acheive so much obtuseness). mind
you, i do not necessarily share the conclusions of the author of what
follows, in fact, i highly appreciate much of what jewish producers
and creators have contributed to our society. anyway, you said it is
up to me to prove my point. now it will be up to you to try and refute
it. enjoy!
s.w.
ELECTRONIC NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA
The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose
chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed
by a man described by one media analyst as a 'control freak', includes
several television production companies (Walt Disney Television,
Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network
with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies. As
for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth
(also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and
Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein
brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family
prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome,
family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White,
under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic
sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the
United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.
ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven
Bornstein, a Jew. This corporation also has a controlling share of
Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable
companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again
in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has
over 3,400 affiliates. Although primarily a telecommunications,
company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $ 1 billion in publishing in
1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton
Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group. Time Warner, Inc,
is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of
the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary
HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by
far the world largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of
which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg Stuart
Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production
unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. Warner Music was an early promoter
of 'gangsta rap.' Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it
helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks
to commit acts of violence against Whites. In addition to cable and
music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature
films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s
publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the
largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated,
People, Fortune). When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in
1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner
made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV
news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key
executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions
contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a
strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real
name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a
loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them.
Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner,
publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for
Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish
theatre, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to
launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995
Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of
non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a
major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns
nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals.
Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstien), a Jew,
is the third largest mega-media corporation in the country, with
revenues of over $ 10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and
distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns, 12
television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films
through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its
publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and
Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster
stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s
largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV,
Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have
acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience.
With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the
hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming
degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on
their part. What about the other big media companies? Number four on
the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox
Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter
Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV
production, is a Jew. Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation,
whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael
Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures
division. Most of the television and movie production companies that
are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews.
For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst
as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,
“is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller
media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. Dream
Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry
mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey
Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are
Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television
programs, and recorded music. Two other large production companies,
MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd.
The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman
Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress. It is well
known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of
films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades
of the 20th century. This is still the case today. Films produced by
just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above-Disney,
Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Vioacom), and Universal
(Seagram)-accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts
for the first eight months of 1995. The big three in television
network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the
consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer
independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was
controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS
first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by
David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert. Over periods of several
decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and
the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the
networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in
television news remains particularly strong. As noted, ABC is part of
Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news
programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good
Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight). CBS was
recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless,
the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of
CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. At NBC, now owned by General Electirc,
NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers
Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal
Shapiro (Dateline). The Print Media After television news, daily
newspapers are the most influential information medium in America.
Sixty millions of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These
millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications. One
might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across
America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and
distortion. However, this is not the case. These is less independence,
less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a
casual observer would think. The days when most cities and even towns
had several independently owned newspapers published by local people
with close ties to the community are gone. Today, most “local”
newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies
controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or even thousands
of miles away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the
country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to
multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain
independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest
depend on these few for all of their national and international news.
The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse
provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among
America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable
appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on
which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26 daily
newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the
Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans
Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing
conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse
Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable
networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more
than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines,
including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair,
Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the
other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. This Jewish
media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant
from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse
family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers
are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It
is advertising revenue—not the small change collected from a
newspaper’s readers—that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields
the owner’s profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to
favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored
newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning
of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a
dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of
American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline
in the number of competing Gentile newspapers—primarily as a result of
selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants. Furthermore, even
those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so
thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their
editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by
Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as
elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.
THREE JEWISH NEWSPAPERS
The suppression of competition and the establishment of local
monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting
ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of
Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples
of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the
New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals,
are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly
all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what
isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands. The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles,
Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased
in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph
Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s
current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and
the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter are also
Jews. The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co.,
33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe’ twelve magazines,
including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5
million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations’ a cable-TV
system’ and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News
Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New
York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and
magazines. Of similar national importance is the Washington Post,
which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in
Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal
government. The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a
non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins,
purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by
Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great
Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased
at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier. The
Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s
daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of
the Washington Post Co. In 1979, she appointed her son Donald
publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and
CEO of the Washington Post Co. The Washington Post Co. has a number of
other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most
notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The
Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is
the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow
Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24
other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s,
among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann,
who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of
the Wall Street Journal. Most of New York’s other major newspapers are
in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street
Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate
developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz
Mountain pet supply firm.
OTHER MASS MEDIA
The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for
television, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example,
newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report. Time,
with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a subsidiary
of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications,
as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew. Newsweek, as mentioned
above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess
Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million. U.S.
News & World Report, with a weekly circulation 2.3 million, is owned
and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the
Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News,
which is the sixth-largest paper in the country. Among the giant
book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of
the six largest book publishers in the U.S. according to Publisher’s
Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews. The three are first-place
Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing
Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner
Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown). Another
publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it
ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first
among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 per cent of
the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just
replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.
wf...@ptnospam.com
<asky...@rebeloutpost.org> wrote:
>On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 01:42:16 GMT, wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>
>>
>>you see, aristotle long ago found that those who make an assertion are
>>bound to prove it. it's not up to me to do your homework, my little
>>hooded, cross burning friend.
>>
>>that's why bigotry dies. because morons like you are just too stupid
>>to think.
>>
>bigotry is alive and well, trust me. for this reason, it wasn't too
>hard to find an ample amount of sites that aid me in illustrating your
>vast and what must be pretended ignorance
well let's see what the little cross burner has to say:
>
>s.w.
>
>ELECTRONIC NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA
>
>The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose
>chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew.
wow. of the thousands of newspapers nationwide, the hundreds of TV
stations...cable networks
mickey mouse's boss is jewish..
you convinced me.
The Disney Empire, headed
>by a man described by one media analyst as a 'control freak', includes
>several television production companies (Walt Disney Television,
>Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network
>with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies. As
>for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group,
oh. mickey mouse's boss is still jewish?
why didnt you say so?
headed by Joe Roth
>(also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and
>Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein
>brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family
>prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome,
>family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White,
snow white screws a guy who's circumsized.
i can see why you're upset. hoping for a piece of the princess
yourself, were you?
>under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic
>sex and violence.
yeah i know. violence was never a problem in the US media until the
kikes took over.
In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the
>United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.
>ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven
>Bornstein, a Jew.
i hate sports, and never watch ESPN so who cares what he does?
This corporation also has a controlling share of
>Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable
>companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again
>in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has
>over 3,400 affiliates.
ah. AFFILIATES. he doesnt CONTROL anything. these stations are
AFFILIATES who are free, at any time, to drop ABC like a fat guy being
pushed off a building.
Although primarily a telecommunications,
>company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $ 1 billion in publishing in
>1994. It owns seven daily newspapers,
geez. 7 daily newspapers.
out of the thousands published daily, a jew owns 7.
you're right; the US is turning into tel aviv.
Fairchild Publications, Chilton
>Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group.
chilton is a trade publisher. the manual for the engines on my boat
are published by chilton.
searching as hard as i could, i couldnt find a reference to zionism in
by 'alpha and bravo outdrive manual'.
mebbe you can help me understand how the jews are running my boat.
> When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in
>1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation.
ah. i see. well i DO watch CNN. and you seem to find that turner's not
jewish. CNN is, after fox, the most watched news network in the
country.
so much for your spin that the jews control the media.
Turner
>made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV
>news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key
>executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions
>contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a
>strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real
>name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable:
the jews are so much in control of the media, that they're not in
control.
golly. do you often argue against your own position like this?
and he's never taken a position contrary to jewish interests?
that, folks, is called 'circular reasoning'. our own alfred rosenberg,
hysterical at the non-existence of the jewish media, says that turner
is a jewish wannabe because the media is controlled by jews.
who wudda guessed.
a
>loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them.
>Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner,
>publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for
>Jews.
so you're saying that turner never took an anti-jewish position is,
according to your reference, a jew hater???
holy cow. a zionist antisemite.
yeah you've got the facts nailed down.
Viacom, which produces and
>distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns, 12
>television stations and 12 radio stations.
and there are how many cities and TV stations in the US??
guess you think there are 12.
It produces feature films
>through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its
>publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and
>Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster
>stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s
>largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV,
>Nickelodeon, and other networks.
and neither MTV, showtime, or nickelodeon are news outlets or have
roles in shaping american public opinion about israel or anything
else.
so far you've got
mickey mouse
chilton's engine manuals
espn sport
MTV
as controlled by jews
i'm underwhelmed.
Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have
>acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience.
>With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the
>hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming
>degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on
>their part.
protocols of the elders of zion it seems.
What about the other big media companies? Number four on
>the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox
>Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile,
DAMN those gentile jews!! first there's the zionist antisemite ted
turner, NOW it's murdoch, the gentile. CURSES!!!
and fox is number one in the country for news.
yes, thats right. numbers 1 and 2 are both in the hands of gentiles.
but Peter
>Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV
>production, is a Jew. Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation,
>whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael
>Schulhof, a Jew.
of course, it's RUN by the japanese. you seem to think that any jew,
anywhere, from the CEO to the janitor means a company is jew
controlled.
Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures
>division. Most of the television and movie production companies that
>are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews.
>For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst
>as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,
>“is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller
>media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair.
aint that nice. a kosher affair. yeah you're obviously objective on
the whole situation, brownshirt boy.
Films produced by
>just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above-Disney,
>Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Vioacom), and Universal
>(Seagram)-accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts
>for the first eight months of 1995.
and you know what's funny?
theodor herzl never showed up in any of 'em. yep, that's right. you
claim there's great jewish influence and ownership in the media.
but your own reference says there aint.
the 2 BIGGEST news organizations in the united states...fox, and CNN,
are owned by gentiles.
jewish ownership, according to your own reference...is strictly
limited to trade publications (chiltons) or entertainment.
in any case, who the hell cares?
CBS was
>recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless,
>the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of
>CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. At NBC, now owned by General Electirc,
>NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers
>Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal
>Shapiro (Dateline).
golly. there are jews in the media. they dont control it. they're not
even number 1 and 2.
so, again, who cares?
The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the
>country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to
>multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain
>independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest
>depend on these few for all of their national and international news.
>The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse
>provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among
>America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable
>appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on
>which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26 daily
>newspapers,
so jews own 26 of 1500 papers?? thats less than 2%. jews are about 2%
of the population.
guess you figure they should just stay in the business of grinding up
the bones of gentile children for passover seder use.
including several large and important ones, such as the
>Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger
ah, newark star ledger. trust me, if they live in newark, they deserve
what they get.
but the NSL serves the new york metro area...home to america's largest
jewish population.
you seem astonished that jews might own a newspaper in an area where
there are alot of jews.
i, OTOH, am astonished at your astonishment.
>THREE JEWISH NEWSPAPERS
>
>The suppression of competition and the establishment of local
>monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
>the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting
>ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of
>Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples
>of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the
>New York Times, the Wall Street Journal,
hmmm....lets see....
new york. home to 3 million jews...well educated...now who would guess
that the NY times and WSJ would have jews on their staffs?
hell i used to work for bell labs. we had alot of jewish
physicists...but then, lets see...bell labs...new york metro
area...lots of well educated jews...who would guess they'd show up at
the labs
you seem to be making a remarkable discovery: well educated people
show up in influential occupations.
that definitely leaves your worthless ass out in the cold.
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co.,
>33 other newspapers,
ah, so total jewish paper ownership is now up to 60 of 1500 papers.
wow. you're right. it's ha'aretz all over again. time to break out the
yarmulkes.
hey genius.
i'm glad you told me this.
the next time i'm fixing my boat engine, or watching a basketball game
on TV i'll be sure to watch out for jewish interests.
when i'm not purusing the jewish press which accounts for 4% off all
US newspapers, according to your figures.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
<C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
>Haven't you any ambition? Are you so poor that the rich, including your boss
>are so out of reach of your goals? Or have you none?
i said people who abuse their privilages and don't want to be held
accountable. as it stands, i am lucky to be from a successful family,
have gotten a decent education and have numerous marketable skills
myself, which are of benefit to me regardless of the economic status
of the country. my problem is with people who mess things up for the
rest of us who want to play by the rules, or who are forced to play by
rules that penalize us while providing others gratuitous benefits, ala
the ultra-privilaged, corporate gravy train gov't leaches who happen
to have bushco. as their beholden buddy.
s.w.
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
You know if Clinton didn't politicize the Justice department and enforced
existing laws, many of the accounting scandal would have been caught during
his reign of corruption. As it 'is', it took a new lawman in a new
administration to bat clean-up for the neglect of his predecessor
Snakehawk
>
> My step-mother is from Vietnamese, her family pooled their money together
> after getting settled in the new world and bought a used shrimp boat back in
> the 70's. You may have heard the story on 60 Minutes. Their all millionaires
> today.
>
> Smart people use money, not their backs. People that hate Jews probably hate
> the Vietnamese too because of envy for what they do with family recourses,
> like but their children through college. After a few generations, the
> momentom of success may be profound, in the class of Nobel.
It seems all those smart Vietnamese only do well in the United States.
Most of those smart Vietnamese in Vietnam are dirt poor. It's sort of
like those smart Jews who prosper among gentiles but in their own
country can't make it without billions of dollars in annual
assistance.
The trick, of course, is a system of clannish exclusivity within an
economic community. The members of the clan assist each other to the
detriment of all others who do business with them. They pool their
resources to give their group financial clout. They use outsiders only
for cheap labor and exploit their advantage by excluding the outsiders
from any positions of power or influence within the clan enterprises.
They use their combined financial resources to gain ownership and thus
control over established businesses. Once a number of enterprises are
established, they can gang up against any threat of outside
competition. They make advantageous loans to each other, sometimes
interest free, and avoid borrowing from outsiders. They, in effect,
form a tight little (or even big) cabal within a community to milk the
outsiders of whatever they can, never really becoming part of the
community. Invariably, they attribute their success to some sort of
superior quality of the members of the clan.
Of course, in America when members of the surrounding community begin
to treat the clan as outsiders, clan members scream bigotry and
prejudice. If any outside group forms their own clan and excludes
anyone, the clans protest, demonstrate, even file suit for
discrimination. It's not the American way, they insist. All the
while, they amass their resources, extract their profits, and collect
their rent and interest from the outsiders while ceaselessly striving
to consolidate their positions, always excluding the outsiders from
all but the most trivial positions.
>
> Look what Islam has done to squander what oil revenue has brought them.
>
> What has your family done with their money?
>
> CB
Typical of the clan mentality. Bigotry, racism, chauvism, and
contempt for outsiders is the mark of the clan. To the clan members,
all outsiders are jealous of the superior clan. All outsiders do not
have the skill and expertise to succeed.
In fact, "Islam" has done nothing to squander oil revenues. Arabs live
in an region limited in all other resources besides oil. They must
depend on the West to buy their oil and provide the other resources.
They have been surprisingly successful in maintaining a stable
production and earning steady profits for over half-a-century. Their
money is safely and wisely invested worldwide. Some of the richest
people in the world are Muslims--and they didn't have to steal it or
take advantage of unsuspecting neighbors to get it.
The Arabs are constantly threatened by outside agitators, not the
least of which is the American CIA, who infiltrate, bribe, cajole,
threaten, and even bomb, trying to wrest control of the rich oil
fields from the native Arabs. So far, the west has had limited
success. The Arabs still control most of their oil and have complete
control over all their finances. What's more, they did it in their own
country, among their own people, without having to move to America to
take advantage of naive Americans. Neither the Vietnamese nor the
Jews can make the same claim.
drahcir
wrote:
Interesting theory. Please do us a favor and apply it to the poster's
stepmother with the shrimp boat.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
"Snakehawk" <snak...@MailAndNews.com> wrote in message
news:31fc4513.02120...@posting.google.com...
Oh, the smell of competition and the sound of Capitalism, the lazy mans and
poor planners boss.
>
> Of course, in America when members of the surrounding community begin
> to treat the clan as outsiders, clan members scream bigotry and
> prejudice. If any outside group forms their own clan and excludes
> anyone, the clans protest, demonstrate, even file suit for
> discrimination. It's not the American way, they insist. All the
> while, they amass their resources, extract their profits, and collect
> their rent and interest from the outsiders while ceaselessly striving
> to consolidate their positions, always excluding the outsiders from
> all but the most trivial positions.
We all have to start somewhere. I started as the Lawn Mower Mayhn and worked
my self up to mean rich boss to some, benevolent boss who's generosity at
Christmas made the holidays more giving.
§K¥ Wå£K€®
<C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
clinton clinton clinton....its all his and his penis' fault!!
you know, one person's transgressions don't excuse another's more
grievous wrongs.
s.w.
ELC
they were tricked into giving their money to shifty Christian
religious leaders? Oh, I'll bet you'll say "They might have lost
their money, but at least not all their kids were fucked by priests.
They should show more thanks."
666
> > together after getting settled in the new world and bought a used
> > shrimp boat back in the 70's. You may have heard the story on 60
> > Minutes. Their all millionaires today.
[snip]
> The trick, of course, is a system of clannish exclusivity within an
> economic community.
Phew... I'm sure glad they exclude me from their shrimp boat
operations! allah akbar!
> They use outsiders only for cheap labor and exploit their advantage
> by excluding the outsiders from any positions of power or influence
> within the clan enterprises.
What specific position did you have in mind? Master shrimp peeler?
> They use their combined financial resources to gain ownership
> and thus control over established businesses. Once a number of
That's exciting, when's Shrimp Boat Inc going to make me an offer for
my lucrative business?
> to consolidate their positions, always excluding the outsiders
> from all but the most trivial positions.
Awww honey have you even sent in your resume for that Master Shrimp
Peeler position? Or are you just griping and wallowing in self-pity?
I'm sure your application will be considered with indulgence by the
Godfather errr... I meant Stepmother.
neptune3
>If It Walks Like a Duck...
>
Homosexual activists are exploiting their agenda through "safe school"
laws across the nation - and California is their latest laboratory.
It?s 1 o?clock in the morning and 27-year-old Lybe Crumpton is
standing
alone, shaking and on the verge of tears. No, she hasn?t been robbed.
She?s
a fifth-grade teacher who?s afraid her students might be harmed by the
homosexual agenda.
A petite brunette with large brown eyes, she has just watched her
school
board approve the idea that classrooms like hers play a video called
That?s
A Family!, featuring 9- and 10-year-old children lauding the benefits
of living
with two moms or two dads.
?My dads are gay, and gay means . . . two men or two women love each
other,? says one smiling girl in the video. ?It?s sort of like having
a mom and a
dad love each other, just that it is a man and a man.?
But that?s not the worst of it. The video ? which also portrays
children of
divorced, single and even jailed parents ? comes with a teachers?
handbook including a crossword puzzle for elementary kids using words
like
?transgender? and discussion questions such as, ?What did you learn
from
this video about families with gay parents? What else would you like
to
know??
It was five hours ago that Crumpton slipped unnoticed into the back of
the
Novato, Calif., school board meeting and heard gay-rights activists
warning
the board it had better allow ?tolerance? lessons like this video ? or
risk
lawsuits.
That upsets Crumpton because she doesn?t think elementary-school kids
are ready to discuss sexual lifestyles, especially one as physically
and
spiritually devastating as homosexuality.
?They?re not worried about who is sleeping with whom,? she says. ?They
worry about who?s the best at soccer.?
But after pro-gay activists and parents faced off over the video into
the
pre-dawn hours, the board voted to test the film in fifth-grade
classes and
consider introducing it to more grades next year.
?They are just opening a Pandora?s box,? Crumpton told Citizen moments
after the vote.
Exploiting Danger
What?s happening in Novato, an affluent Bay-area suburb in Northern
California, has become increasingly common across the nation as
homosexual activists use ?safe school? laws and concerns over school
bullying to advance their agenda.
It works like this: First, homosexual activists tout ?hate crimes? ?
those sad
but rare incidents in which students are harmed because they are gay ?
and then they push for laws protecting homosexual students. Once those
laws pass, activists persuade schools to adopt curricula that promotes
not
just student safety, but acceptance of homosexuality.
?Making schools safe . . . is strongly tied to ensuring that
classrooms are
inclusive of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] themes,? said
the
Web site for one of the nation?s largest homosexual lobby groups ? the
Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).
GLSEN?s executive director, Kevin Jennings, made no secret of that
strategy
while extolling homosexual activists? inroads into Massachusetts
schools a
few years ago.
?We immediately seized upon the opponents? calling card ? safety,? he
said. ?We knew that, confronted with real-life stories of youth who
had
suffered from homophobia, our opponents would automatically be on the
defensive. . . . This allowed us to set the terms of the debate.?
So far the tactic is working; at least eight states have passed safe
school
laws to protect gay and lesbian students, and five more (including
Florida
and New York) are considering similar legislation.
But it?s California schools that have taken the lead.
Over the last two years, legislators in Sacramento have cranked out
laws
requiring curriculum to reflect ?appreciation? of different sexual
lifestyles and
adding ?sexual orientation? to school discrimination policies.
Those laws leave schools that resist homosexual pressure vulnerable to
lawsuits, explained Jeff McAlpin, a Novato school board member who
voted
against pro-homosexual curriculum.
?The state of California has put us in a very difficult position,? he
said. ?We
don?t have a choice in terms of providing protection [for homosexual
rights],
so then the question becomes how far do we go?
?It puts you at some level of risk if they can prove you didn?t have a
safe
environment.? And that risk has cast the door wide open to homosexual
activists wielding the threat of lawsuits.
The Gay-Straight Alliance Network (GSA), for instance ? a group that
openly pushes for the normalization of homosexuality through student
clubs
? has issued a fact sheet urging activists to ?think of AB 537 [a
California
safe school law] as a tool and use it as leverage to work to change
the
school climate.?
Apparently, members took their marching orders seriously.
After homosexual students in Visalia, Calif., complained of
harassment, their
district was punished with a federal court settlement under AB 537
that
forced teachers to receive mandatory gay-rights training. This year,
the
district?s ninth-grade students also will attend court-ordered classes
taught
by the GSA.
While the case does not directly apply to Novato, said McAlpin, ?It
was
clearly a shot across the bows of all school districts that [safe
school laws]
had an impact on one district . . . and other districts better be
careful.?
?Part of the Price?
If the California education system is the latest gay-rights
laboratory, then the
Hayward Unified School District is its most successful experiment.
Unlike Novato, with its Victorian homes and white picket fences,
Hayward is
an industrial town on the south side of the Bay filled with
cinderblock
buildings and windowless factories. But just like Novato, Christian
teachers
in Hayward feel forced to promote a political agenda.
?Our backs are against the wall,? said Matthew Freschi, a physical
education teacher at Hayward High School. ?We feel the need to step
forward. Enough is enough.?
What pushed Freschi into action was the ?2-4-6-8 Are you sure you?re
really
straight?? sign he discovered on his gymnasium door, as well as the
staff
meeting he attended at which teachers were encouraged to assign
students
library books about homosexuals. Both incidents were billed as the
school?s
effort to foster safety for gay and lesbian students.
?I agree that no student should be abused or battered for any reason,?
Freschi said, ?but to me that?s not protecting anybody; that?s
promoting
something.?
Indeed, Hayward is the perfect case study of how safe school laws
create
special privileges for some and oppression for others.
Just ask Monica, a Spanish teacher who had her pay docked last
year for refusing to attend a seminar endorsing homosexuality.
When Hayward school officials ordered teachers to attend ?sensitivity?
training on April 8, Monica and three colleagues at Tennyson High
School requested permission to opt out.
?We didn?t want to sit and be indoctrinated for four hours,? said
Manriquez,
who?d already suffered through previous sensitivity sessions. ?I have
no
problem with being sensitive, but what they mean by that is that we
have to
be pro-gay in our classrooms.?
After the principal denied their request, the teachers sought help
from the
Pacific Justice Institute, a Sacramento-based Christian legal
organization,
which argued that civil-rights laws protect religious freedom in the
workplace.
But school officials claimed safe school laws trumped those rights, in
a letter
stating that ?the District has an obligation to ensure that its
employees are
properly trained in applicable law.? A few days later, the teachers
received
notice their pay would be docked for missing half a day.
?These teachers offered to work [in their classroom], so the issue was
not
their willingness to work,? said Brad Dacus, chief counsel for the
institute.
?The issue was the intolerance of the school district . . . that would
force
teachers to compromise their convictions as Christians.?
That wasn?t the end of their troubles. Dubbed ?The Tennyson Four? by
media, the teachers were derided in local newspapers and ostracized at
work. ?These four teachers are out of touch with the standards of our
community,? wrote the Hayward Daily Review in an editorial. ?It?s
possible
that some public school students in Hayward are being assigned to a
teacher who hates them. . . . Their human rights should outweigh
teachers?
?religious rights.? ?
?Nobody would talk to us for a while,? added Monica. ?But that?s part
of
the price.?
As the Hayward school district quietly trampled on religious freedom,
it drew
national attention for a resolution granting homosexual teachers the
right to
declare their homosexuality ?without fear of reprisal? and bring up
homosexual relationships in class without parental consent.
Once again waiving the safe school banner, the April 10 resolution
asserted
that a ?crisis exists in Hayward? and called for ?ongoing sensitivity
training?
and curriculum that provides ?positive images of GLBT [gay, lesbian,
bisexual, transgender] people in the classroom.?
In a newspaper interview, Tennyson drama teacher Kelsey Hartman
expressed relief that she could now talk about her lesbianism and have
students read a play featuring two women falling in love without fear
of
punishment: ?Now I know we have support,? she said. ?If I?m ashamed,
it
shows the students there?s something wrong with it.?
But Christian teachers don?t have the same protection. At previous
sensitivity seminars, Monica said she was told ?our religion is not to
be
brought up. We are to talk about our culture, but not our religion.?
Courage Under Fire
Another Christian teacher who did attend the April 8 training, Cynthia
Huggett, says Monica was right to stay away.
When Huggett arrived, the first thing she saw was a display of
newspaper
articles about The Tennyson Four. ?There was a lot of negativity
toward
them,? Huggett remembered. ?I heard comments . . . like they couldn?t
understand why those teachers couldn?t be here. . . . What?s their
problem?
?I was kind of wondering myself, well, why are these four people
refusing to
go??
She soon found out. During sessions led by educators from area
schools,
religion was constantly ridiculed, said Huggett. In a seminar video
called
Teaching Respect, for instance, a presenter matter-of-factly listed
people
homosexual students could go to for help, including parents and
teachers,
but when he got to the word ?pastor,? he stopped.
?He paused, and he looked at the audience to get a laugh out of it
like,
?Right . . . Christians hate gays.? . . . If anything it would be
somebody that
they would not trust. That was the gist of it,? said Huggett, a
Tennyson math
teacher. She recalled her shock when other teachers laughed:
?I was thinking, ?Why are they laughing? Here this was called
?sensitivity?
awareness. . . . First you start with joking, you break the ice by
saying we
can make fun of these people now.?
According to Huggett and others , the video also
claimed that biblical references about Jesus sitting at the right hand
of God
were used to discriminate against left-handed people.
?They used Scripture to point out the fact that . . . Christians have
a history
from the beginning of bashing homosexuality and people who are
different
because God said so,? said Huggett. ?I thought, ?How dare you say I
can?t
stand up and talk to my kids about what I believe and bring out the
Bible, but
you can go ahead for your purposes and actually misquote [the Bible]??
?
By the time the lunch break rolled around, Huggett was too distraught
to
stay, so she sought comfort at home in a daily devotional book. To her
surprise, Hebrews 12:2, a verse that describes Jesus sitting at the
right
hand of God, was referenced on that day?s page.
?To come home and see it in my journal . . . it was one of those
moments in
my Christian walk that I felt was the closest thing to God just
opening his
mouth and talking to me,? Huggett said. ?It was like, ?Yes Cindy, you
are
right. . . . You see what?s going on. You see the evil in it. You
understand it.
And I?m going to let you know by Scripture.? ?
Emboldened, she spoke her mind a few days later at a faculty meeting.
?I strongly feel that if I don?t say something, this will continue and
Christians
will be bashed again and again,? ?And I?m not going to let
that happen. I will not stay here if that is going to happen. I will
lose my job
and wash dishes if I have to.?
Cinderfella?
So what does coercing Christian teachers into attending seminars that
belittle their religion have to do with teaching homosexuality to
kids? The
answer is simple: To advance their cause, homosexual activists must
first
undermine beliefs that categorize right and wrong behavior.
?We?ve seen the same pattern emerge over and over,? said Scott Lively,
who as director of the Pro-Family Law Center has tracked homosexual
infiltration into Vermont, Oregon and Massachusetts school districts.
?The
gay agenda is first pushed to teachers, then they are trained how to
get it in
the classroom. They are being trained that it is acceptable, even
expected,
to trample on the private beliefs and values of the students in their
care.?
Handouts from the Hayward sensitivity seminars over the
past two years illustrate this agenda. A ?What You Can Do? list
distributed at one of this year?s seminars, for instance, suggested
that
teachers ?say the words often ? lesbian, gay, bisexual ? in a positive
way?
and ?identify gay, lesbian, bisexual contributors throughout the
curriculum.?
Another handout encouraged schools to ?bring in openly gay, lesbian,
bisexual adults as resources in classes and assemblies? and identify
staff
who ?are gay-friendly and to whom questioning students may go for
advice.?
Demonstrating blatant disregard for parental control, yet another page
entitled ?If a Student Comes Out to You? told teachers ?if trust and
openness
exist, sexual behavior could also be addressed.?
For teachers in need of more indoctrination tools, a ?Resources? list
distributed at a 2001 seminar recommended several gay-rights
curricula,
including ?Preventing Prejudice: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender
Lesson Plans for Elementary Schools.?
A copy of ?Preventing Prejudice? includes a lesson plan
for first- and second-graders entitled ?Who Loves Whom? LGBT
Relationships.? The plan encourages teachers to introduce the lesson
on
Valentine?s Day ?to broaden the definition of love that is associated
with that
holiday? and to ?ask students to rewrite stories that involve
heterosexual
relationships, e.g., fairy tales like Cinderella, substituting LGBT
relationships.?
A kindergarten lesson included in the same curriculum called ?Jesse?s
Dream Skirt? tells a story about a little boy who is praised for
wearing a
dress to school.
According to Hayward district spokesperson Kim Hammond, those lesson
plans, as well as books like Heather Has Two Mommies, are ?available
to
all staff in the district.?
?What disturbs me most,? said Huggett, ?is that once you say this
should be
part of our curriculum, [teachers] will have to appear to believe that
homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle.?
Given the pressure on teachers, the only hope for public education is
parental outrage
There will be no resistance [to pro-homosexual curriculum] from within
the
system, from the administration. There might be individual teachers
who
object, but the union is lock-stock in step with this. As a matter of
fact, much
of the leadership is controlled by these people anyway.
When one school had a gay-pride day, there wasn?t a peep of protest,
an
anonymous administrator said. ?If the phones were ringing off the
hooks the day after
they did that . . . saying, ?How dare you?? believe me, it would have
empowered the staff to say, ?You know this is really taking things too
far.?
But the great masses just seem to be, I don?t know, asleep.?
Signs of Hope
Back in Novato, though, there are signs parents are waking up.
?When they talk about doing this to my kid behind my back, it ticks me
off. It
really makes my blood boil and I can?t just sit back and say nothing,?
said
33-year-old Susan Barnes, who said she?ll remove her second-grader
from
public school if homosexual curriculum is adopted.
To prevent that from happening, Barnes and other concerned parents
formed the First Educators Alliance (FEA).
Each FEA parent commits to attend at least one monthly school board
meeting. ?Lack of presence is the reason they?ve been able to get away
with
this stuff over all these years,? said FEA representative,
grandmother-of-nine
Sara Lockwood.
It was at one of those board meetings that parents discovered the
district?s
plans to test That?s A Family! in grades 4-8 and adopt it the
following year.
So FEA launched a letter-writing campaign and the ?Street Corner
Ministry?:
Novato moms who distribute information from sidewalks about the gay
agenda?s inroads into the classroom.
The weekend before the board voted on That?s A Family!,
mother-of-three
Vanessa Wills spent her Saturday in front of a grocery store. ?Almost
every
parent I talked to, whether or not they agreed with the
homosexual lifestyle, said the same thing: This is something that
should be
taught in home, not in the classroom.?
Meanwhile, another group of parents joined forces to protect their
quickly
eroding parental rights. Calling themselves the Novato Parents and
Family
Coalition, they circulated a petition calling for parental control
over how
sexual lifestyles are addressed in the classroom ? and collected more
than
1,200 signatures in just three weeks.
?When this agenda came to town, it was moral anthrax,? said one
petition
collector, Edison Fowler, whose wife is a first-grade teacher. ?I saw
them
giving it to kids and nobody could see it, nobody knew it existed. . .
. It?s that
serious.
?On the news you heard about people dying, and how they?d spend
millions
of dollars going through with gloves and sterile [equipment] to make
sure
nobody else got hurt. I thought, ?We need to be that meticulous and
that
caring about what they are presenting to the hearts of children.?
Because
once it goes in, it?s hidden. It?s undetectable, yet it continues to
work.?
Of the 1,200 people surveyed, said Fowler, only 7 percent knew about
the
upcoming curriculum vote.
But by the time the school board met on Aug. 20, grassroots groups had
changed that percentage.
The meeting attracted a standing-room-only crowd of 300. And after
five
hours of public comments (the majority against the video), it was
clear board
members couldn?t test the video in four grade levels without serious
political
consequences. So they voted instead to introduce it only in
fifth-grade
?Family Life? sex education classes, which already have an ?opt-out?
option
for parents who don?t want their children to attend.
Though the video will still be seen by some students, getting it
acknowledged for what it is ? a lesson about sex, not ?tolerance? ?
was an
important win, said Pro-Family Law Center Director Scott Lively,
because
?the gay movement has taken a nearly universal goal among teachers and
parents for students to be civil to one another and wrapped their own
agenda in it.
?They say that the only way students can respect each other is if they
say
homosexuality is good and normal.?
But semantics meant little to fifth-grade teacher Lybe Crumpton, who
still
didn?t want to teach something that contradicted her Christian
beliefs. So
she confronted her principal.
?I waited until lunch because I had to psych myself up all morning,?
she said
?By the time I went in, I had come to the conclusion that if I lost my
job over it, that was fine.
?I said that I couldn?t in good faith or good conscience teach that
curriculum
to children.?
For now, the principal has agreed to let her opt out since it is a
pilot
program, said Crumpton. But if it becomes core curriculum, there?ll be
no
choice for Crumpton. There will be a choice for Christian parents,
though ?
to continue fighting for truly safe schools free of homosexual ind
http://stormfront.org http://www.kukluxklan.org
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore
little society values the traditional family. Homosexuality represents 4-6%
of the population but yet can intimidate law makers into writing Hate Laws
which disproportionately protect minorities from bullies. The psychological
intimidation and threats of financial loss far more bullies the straight
population into concessions into what is acceptable behavior.
Private behavior should remain private. What homosexuals has come out of the
bedroom to flaunt unnatural affection and to hell with civility.
--
CB
"The first act of man, when he looked around and saw himself a creature
which he did not make, and a world furnished for his reception, must have
been devotion, and devotion must ever continue sacred to every individual
man, as it appears right to him; and governments do mischief by
interfering."
--Thomas Paine
"neptune3" <np...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:49kmvuk54i04fp0ei...@4ax.com...
KazamaSmokers
...?it was? a ?very ?difficult post to ?read.
Kevin...@corecom.net
<C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
>How a majority can let a minority dictate more authority is testament of how
>little society values the traditional family. Homosexuality represents 4-6%
>of the population but yet can intimidate law makers into writing Hate Laws
>which disproportionately protect minorities from bullies. The psychological
>intimidation and threats of financial loss far more bullies the straight
>population into concessions into what is acceptable behavior.
The issue is that the dems know they are the loser party. Since they
need every vote they can get to have any chance, they get into bed
with anyone and anything that the republicans are against. Hence they
love issues that are destroying our world such as homosexuality.
Footmaster 2040
> How a majority can let a minority dictate more authority is testament
> of how little society values the traditional family. Homosexuality
> represents 4-6% of the population but yet can intimidate law makers
> into writing Hate Laws which disproportionately protect minorities
> from bullies.
Maybe it's because the minorities *need* such protection.
Tyranny of the majority - mob rule - is what led to Auschwitz. Or
the pogroms of old Russia, or ethnic cleansing in the Balkans.
And it's not only gays that are at risk. *Any* minority can be a
target, especially in conventional schools. It could be by race.
It could be left-handers, geeks, artists, musicians, non-Christians,
goths, skaters, the disabled, etc.
> The psychological intimidation and threats of financial loss far
> more bullies the straight population into concessions into what
> is acceptable behavior.
And how it that any different from your right-wing utopia, where
gays are afraid to come out of the closet? I don't agree that anyone
should be persecuted - but if older habitual bullies respect only
force and fear, then these might be needed to keep them under
control, and the first step in their rehabiliation.
What if your own son was falsely accused of being gay, by vicious
rumor-mongers at his local school? You might think twice about
sanctioned homophobia - and about "dog-eat-dog" schools that fail
to protect unpopular students.
> Private behavior should remain private. What homosexuals has come
> out of the bedroom to flaunt unnatural affection and to hell with
> civility.
What difference does it make? Are gays *forcing* their lifestyle on
you, or anyone else? (Like heteroes have been doing to gays for so
many centuries.) Are gays forming gangs, and beating up anyone who's
different from them? (Like flag-waving jocks do all the time in high
schools throughout the nation, right as we speak.)
- F.M. -
neptune3
2040) wrote:
>
>Tyranny of the majority - mob rule - is what led to Auschwitz.
Auschwitz was occupied by the Communists on January 27,1945. They
made reports about what they claim to have found. These initial
reports had not yet been adapted to allied propaganda. The reports
were published on February 1 and 2, 1945 in the Soviet propaganda
organ Pravda. Here are some things it said:
"the Germans in Auschwitz began to remove the traces of their
crimes"
"They leveled the burial grounds."
"They removed and destroyed all traces of the electric conveyer
system, where hundreds of people at one time were electrocuted."
"The stationary gas chambers in the east side of the camp were
remodeled."
"This huge death mill was equipped with the latest style of fascist
technology..."
The Communists did not even claim to have seen any killing
machines or rooms. Supposedly it was all destroyed or remodelled. The
did not allow the other allies to enter the camp, and they did not
supply any pictures or blueprints or any physical evidence.
Nevertheless, the United Press correspondent, Henry Shapiro,
obediantly echoed the Soviets story.
The Soviets said that the Auschwitz complex was entirely a "murder
machine". There was not a single word to indicate that the camp was
part of the German armament industies, as we now know it clearly was.
Even if the Germans had "leveled" the alleged huge grave pits the
bodies would still be present. However anyone familiar with the matter
knows that in Auschwitz no large grave sites were ever found.
The Communists did not allow any inspection of the camps by foreign
observers for many months afterwards and their claims conflict with
what "holocaust experts" say today. Today the experts all talk of gas
chambers is Birkenau, a part of the camp far to the west. This is much
different from where the Communists initially claimed that they were.
The Communists said the gas chambers were "remodelled", while today
the experts say the gas chambers were completely destroyed. The
Communists said the gas chambers were made to look like "harmless
garages". But they did not supply a single photo of one.
The initial Communist reports also do not mention things that are
now claimed to have been there. There is no mention of a pile of
eyeglasses, or hair, or shoes. There is no mention of underground gas
chambers. There is no mention of "farmhouses" remodelled to be gas
chambers. There is no mention of the rivers clogged with human ashes.
Today the experts are forced to admit that there were no gas
chambers in Germany. We are now told that "gassing" and
"extermination" camps were located exclusively in what is
now Poland, in areas captured by the Soviet Red Army and made
off-limits to
western investigators.
Today tourists can go to Auschwitz and be shown a "gas chamber".
This is admitted by the experts not to be genuine.
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V
are in their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it
would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully admit
that
it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
Or
>
>What difference does it make? Are gays *forcing* their lifestyle on
>you, or anyone else?
Homosexual activists are exploiting their agenda through "safe school"
laws across the nation - and California is their latest laboratory.
It's 1 o'clock in the morning and 27-year-old Lybe Crumpton is
standing
alone, shaking and on the verge of tears. No, she hasn't been robbed.
She's
a fifth-grade teacher who's afraid her students might be harmed by the
homosexual agenda.
A petite brunette with large brown eyes, she has just watched her
school
board approve the idea that classrooms like hers play a video called
That's
A Family!, featuring 9- and 10-year-old children lauding the benefits
of living
with two moms or two dads.
My dads are gay, and gay means . . . two men or two women love each
other, says one smiling girl in the video. It's sort of like having a
mom and a
dad love each other, just that it is a man and a man.
But that's not the worst of it. The video which also portrays
children of
divorced, single and even jailed parents comes with a teachers
handbook including a crossword puzzle for elementary kids using words
like
transgender and discussion questions such as, What did you learn from
this video about families with gay parents? What else would you like
to
know?
It was five hours ago that Crumpton slipped unnoticed into the back of
the
Novato, Calif., school board meeting and heard gay-rights activists
warning
the board it had better allow tolerance lessons like this video or
risk
lawsuits.
That upsets Crumpton because she doesn't think elementary-school kids
are ready to discuss sexual lifestyles, especially one as physically
and
spiritually devastating as homosexuality.
They're not worried about who is sleeping with whom, she says. They
worry about who's the best at soccer.
But after pro-gay activists and parents faced off over the video into
the
pre-dawn hours, the board voted to test the film in fifth-grade
classes and
consider introducing it to more grades next year.
They are just opening a Pandora's box, Crumpton told Citizen moments
after the vote.
Exploiting Danger
What's happening in Novato, an affluent Bay-area suburb in Northern
California, has become increasingly common across the nation as
homosexual activists use safe school laws and concerns over school
bullying to advance their agenda.
It works like this: First, homosexual activists tout hate crimes those
sad
but rare incidents in which students are harmed because they are gay
and then they push for laws protecting homosexual students. Once those
laws pass, activists persuade schools to adopt curricula that promotes
not
just student safety, but acceptance of homosexuality.
Making schools safe . . . is strongly tied to ensuring that classrooms
are
inclusive of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] themes, said
the
Web site for one of the nation?s largest homosexual lobby groups the
Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).
GLSEN's executive director, Kevin Jennings, made no secret of that
strategy
while extolling homosexual activists inroads into Massachusetts
schools a
few years ago.
We immediately seized upon the opponents calling card safety, he
said. We knew that, confronted with real-life stories of youth who had
suffered from homophobia, our opponents would automatically be on the
defensive. . . . This allowed us to set the terms of the debate.
So far the tactic is working; at least eight states have passed safe
school
laws to protect gay and lesbian students, and five more (including
Florida
and New York) are considering similar legislation.
But it's California schools that have taken the lead.
Over the last two years, legislators in Sacramento have cranked out
laws
requiring curriculum to reflect appreciation of different sexual
lifestyles and
adding sexual orientation to school discrimination policies.
Those laws leave schools that resist homosexual pressure vulnerable to
lawsuits, explained Jeff McAlpin, a Novato school board member who
voted
against pro-homosexual curriculum.
The state of California has put us in a very difficult position, he
said. We
don't have a choice in terms of providing protection [for homosexual
rights],
so then the question becomes how far do we go?
It puts you at some level of risk if they can prove you didn't have a
safe
environment. And that risk has cast the door wide open to homosexual
activists wielding the threat of lawsuits.
The Gay-Straight Alliance Network (GSA), for instance a group that
openly pushes for the normalization of homosexuality through student
clubs
has issued a fact sheet urging activists to think of AB 537 [a
California
safe school law] as a tool and use it as leverage to work to change
the
school climate.
Apparently, members took their marching orders seriously.
After homosexual students in Visalia, Calif., complained of
harassment, their
district was punished with a federal court settlement under AB 537
that
forced teachers to receive mandatory gay-rights training. This year,
the
district's ninth-grade students also will attend court-ordered classes
taught
by the GSA.
While the case does not directly apply to Novato, said McAlpin, It was
clearly a shot across the bows of all school districts that [safe
school laws]
had an impact on one district . . . and other districts better be
careful.
Part of the Price?
If the California education system is the latest gay-rights
laboratory, then the
Hayward Unified School District is its most successful experiment.
Unlike Novato, with its Victorian homes and white picket fences,
Hayward is
an industrial town on the south side of the Bay filled with
cinderblock
buildings and windowless factories. But just like Novato, Christian
teachers
in Hayward feel forced to promote a political agenda.
Our backs are against the wall, said Matthew Freschi, a physical
education teacher at Hayward High School. We feel the need to step
forward. Enough is enough.
What pushed Freschi into action was the 2-4-6-8 Are you sure you're
really
straight? sign he discovered on his gymnasium door, as well as the
staff
meeting he attended at which teachers were encouraged to assign
students
library books about homosexuals. Both incidents were billed as the
school's
effort to foster safety for gay and lesbian students.
I agree that no student should be abused or battered for any reason,
Freschi said, but to me that's not protecting anybody; that's
promoting
something.
Indeed, Hayward is the perfect case study of how safe school laws
create
special privileges for some and oppression for others.
Just ask Monica, a Spanish teacher who had her pay docked last
year for refusing to attend a seminar endorsing homosexuality.
When Hayward school officials ordered teachers to attend sensitivity
training on April 8, Monica and three colleagues at Tennyson High
School requested permission to opt out.
We didn't want to sit and be indoctrinated for four hours, said
Manriquez,
who'd already suffered through previous sensitivity sessions. I have
no
problem with being sensitive, but what they mean by that is that we
have to
be pro-gay in our classrooms.
After the principal denied their request, the teachers sought help
from the
Pacific Justice Institute, a Sacramento-based Christian legal
organization,
which argued that civil-rights laws protect religious freedom in the
workplace.
But school officials claimed safe school laws trumped those rights, in
a letter
stating that the District has an obligation to ensure that its
employees are
properly trained in applicable law. A few days later, the teachers
received
notice their pay would be docked for missing half a day.
These teachers offered to work [in their classroom], so the issue was
not
their willingness to work, said Brad Dacus, chief counsel for the
institute.
The issue was the intolerance of the school district . . . that would
force
teachers to compromise their convictions as Christians.
That wasn't the end of their troubles. Dubbed The Tennyson Four by
media, the teachers were derided in local newspapers and ostracized at
work. These four teachers are out of touch with the standards of our
community, wrote the Hayward Daily Review in an editorial. It's
possible
that some public school students in Hayward are being assigned to a
teacher who hates them. . . . Their human rights should outweigh
teachers
religious rights.
Nobody would talk to us for a while, added Monica. But that's part of
the price.
As the Hayward school district quietly trampled on religious freedom,
it drew
national attention for a resolution granting homosexual teachers the
right to
declare their homosexuality without fear of reprisal and bring up
homosexual relationships in class without parental consent.
Once again waiving the safe school banner, the April 10 resolution
asserted
that a crisis exists in Hayward and called for ongoing sensitivity
training
and curriculum that provides positive images of GLBT [gay, lesbian,
bisexual, transgender] people in the classroom.
In a newspaper interview, Tennyson drama teacher Kelsey Hartman
expressed relief that she could now talk about her lesbianism and have
students read a play featuring two women falling in love without fear
of
punishment: Now I know we have support, she said. If I'm ashamed, it
shows the students there's something wrong with it.
But Christian teachers don't have the same protection. At previous
sensitivity seminars, Monica said she was told our religion is not to
be
brought up. We are to talk about our culture, but not our religion.
Courage Under Fire
Another Christian teacher who did attend the April 8 training, Cynthia
Huggett, says Monica was right to stay away.
When Huggett arrived, the first thing she saw was a display of
newspaper
articles about The Tennyson Four. There was a lot of negativity toward
them, Huggett remembered. I heard comments . . . like they couldn't
understand why those teachers couldn?t be here. . . . What's their
problem?
I was kind of wondering myself, well, why are these four people
refusing to
go?
She soon found out. During sessions led by educators from area
schools,
religion was constantly ridiculed, said Huggett. In a seminar video
called
Teaching Respect, for instance, a presenter matter-of-factly listed
people
homosexual students could go to for help, including parents and
teachers,
but when he got to the word pastor, he stopped.
He paused, and he looked at the audience to get a laugh out of it
like,
Right . . . Christians hate gays. . . . If anything it would be
somebody that
they would not trust. That was the gist of it, said Huggett, a
Tennyson math
teacher. She recalled her shock when other teachers laughed:
I was thinking, Why are they laughing? Here this was called
sensitivity
awareness. . . . First you start with joking, you break the ice by
saying we
can make fun of these people now.
According to Huggett and others , the video also
claimed that biblical references about Jesus sitting at the right hand
of God
were used to discriminate against left-handed people.
They used Scripture to point out the fact that . . . Christians have a
history
from the beginning of bashing homosexuality and people who are
different
because God said so, said Huggett. I thought, How dare you say I can't
stand up and talk to my kids about what I believe and bring out the
Bible, but
you can go ahead for your purposes and actually misquote [the Bible]?
By the time the lunch break rolled around, Huggett was too distraught
to
stay, so she sought comfort at home in a daily devotional book. To her
surprise, Hebrews 12:2, a verse that describes Jesus sitting at the
right
hand of God, was referenced on that day's page.
To come home and see it in my journal . . . it was one of those
moments in
my Christian walk that I felt was the closest thing to God just
opening his
mouth and talking to me, Huggett said. It was like, Yes Cindy, you are
right. . . . You see what's going on. You see the evil in it. You
understand it.
And I'm going to let you know by Scripture.
Emboldened, she spoke her mind a few days later at a faculty meeting.
I strongly feel that if I don't say something, this will continue and
Christians
will be bashed again and again, And I'm not going to let
that happen. I will not stay here if that is going to happen. I will
lose my job
and wash dishes if I have to.
Cinderfella
So what does coercing Christian teachers into attending seminars that
belittle their religion have to do with teaching homosexuality to
kids? The
answer is simple: To advance their cause, homosexual activists must
first
undermine beliefs that categorize right and wrong behavior.
We've seen the same pattern emerge over and over, said Scott Lively,
who as director of the Pro-Family Law Center has tracked homosexual
infiltration into Vermont, Oregon and Massachusetts school districts.
The
gay agenda is first pushed to teachers, then they are trained how to
get it in
the classroom. They are being trained that it is acceptable, even
expected,
to trample on the private beliefs and values of the students in their
care.
Handouts from the Hayward sensitivity seminars over the
past two years illustrate this agenda. A What You Can Do list
distributed at one of this year's seminars, for instance, suggested
that
teachers say the words often lesbian, gay, bisexual in a positive
way
and identify gay, lesbian, bisexual contributors throughout the
curriculum.
Another handout encouraged schools to bring in openly gay, lesbian,
bisexual adults as resources in classes and assemblies and identify
staff
who are gay-friendly and to whom questioning students may go for
advice.
Demonstrating blatant disregard for parental control, yet another page
entitled If a Student Comes Out to You told teachers if trust and
openness
exist, sexual behavior could also be addressed.
For teachers in need of more indoctrination tools, a Resources list
distributed at a 2001 seminar recommended several gay-rights
curricula,
including Preventing Prejudice: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender
Lesson Plans for Elementary Schools.
A copy of Preventing Prejudice includes a lesson plan
for first- and second-graders entitled Who Loves Whom LGBT
Relationships. The plan encourages teachers to introduce the lesson on
Valentine's Day to broaden the definition of love that is associated
with that
holiday and to ask students to rewrite stories that involve
heterosexual
relationships, e.g., fairy tales like Cinderella, substituting LGBT
relationships.
A kindergarten lesson included in the same curriculum called Jesse's
Dream Skirt tells a story about a little boy who is praised for
wearing a
dress to school.
According to Hayward district spokesperson Kim Hammond, those lesson
plans, as well as books like Heather Has Two Mommies, are available to
all staff in the district.
What disturbs me most, said Huggett, is that once you say this should
be
part of our curriculum, [teachers] will have to appear to believe that
homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle.
Given the pressure on teachers, the only hope for public education is
parental outrage
There will be no resistance [to pro-homosexual curriculum] from within
the
system, from the administration. There might be individual teachers
who
object, but the union is lock-stock in step with this. As a matter of
fact, much
of the leadership is controlled by these people anyway.
When one school had a gay-pride day, there wasn't a peep of protest,
an
anonymous administrator said. If the phones were ringing off the hooks
the day after
they did that . . . saying, How dare you? believe me, it would have
empowered the staff to say, You know this is really taking things too
far.
But the great masses just seem to be, I don't know, asleep.
Signs of Hope
Back in Novato, though, there are signs parents are waking up.
When they talk about doing this to my kid behind my back, it ticks me
off. It
really makes my blood boil and I can't just sit back and say nothing,
said
33-year-old Susan Barnes, who said she'll remove her second-grader
from
public school if homosexual curriculum is adopted.
To prevent that from happening, Barnes and other concerned parents
formed the First Educators Alliance (FEA).
Each FEA parent commits to attend at least one monthly school board
meeting. Lack of presence is the reason they've been able to get away
with
this stuff over all these years, said FEA representative,
grandmother-of-nine
Sara Lockwood.
It was at one of those board meetings that parents discovered the
district's
plans to test That's A Family! in grades 4-8 and adopt it the
following year.
So FEA launched a letter-writing campaign and the Street Corner
Ministry:
Novato moms who distribute information from sidewalks about the gay
agenda's inroads into the classroom.
The weekend before the board voted on That's A Family!,
mother-of-three
Vanessa Wills spent her Saturday in front of a grocery store. Almost
every
parent I talked to, whether or not they agreed with the
homosexual lifestyle, said the same thing: This is something that
should be
taught in home, not in the classroom.
Meanwhile, another group of parents joined forces to protect their
quickly
eroding parental rights. Calling themselves the Novato Parents and
Family
Coalition, they circulated a petition calling for parental control
over how
sexual lifestyles are addressed in the classroom and collected more
than
1,200 signatures in just three weeks.
When this agenda came to town, it was moral anthrax, said one petition
collector, Edison Fowler, whose wife is a first-grade teacher. I saw
them
giving it to kids and nobody could see it, nobody knew it existed. . .
. It's that
serious.
On the news you heard about people dying, and how they'd spend
millions
of dollars going through with gloves and sterile [equipment] to make
sure
nobody else got hurt. I thought, We need to be that meticulous and
that
caring about what they are presenting to the hearts of children.
Because
once it goes in, it's hidden. It's undetectable, yet it continues to
work.
Of the 1,200 people surveyed, said Fowler, only 7 percent knew about
the
upcoming curriculum vote.
But by the time the school board met on Aug. 20, grassroots groups had
changed that percentage.
The meeting attracted a standing-room-only crowd of 300. And after
five
hours of public comments (the majority against the video), it was
clear board
members couldn't test the video in four grade levels without serious
political
consequences. So they voted instead to introduce it only in
fifth-grade
Family Life sex education classes, which already have an opt-out
option
for parents who don't want their children to attend.
Though the video will still be seen by some students, getting it
acknowledged for what it is a lesson about sex, not tolerance was an
important win, said Pro-Family Law Center Director Scott Lively,
because
the gay movement has taken a nearly universal goal among teachers and
parents for students to be civil to one another and wrapped their own
agenda in it.
They say that the only way students can respect each other is if they
say
homosexuality is good and normal.
But semantics meant little to fifth-grade teacher Lybe Crumpton, who
still
didn't want to teach something that contradicted her Christian
beliefs. So
she confronted her principal.
I waited until lunch because I had to psych myself up all morning, she
said
By the time I went in, I had come to the conclusion that if I lost my
job over it, that was fine.
I said that I couldn't in good faith or good conscience teach that
curriculum
to children.
For now, the principal has agreed to let her opt out since it is a
pilot
program, said Crumpton. But if it becomes core curriculum, there'll be
no
choice for Crumpton. There will be a choice for Christian parents,
though
Footmaster 2040
> Auschwitz was occupied by the Communists on January 27,1945. They
> made reports about what they claim to have found. These initial
> reports had not yet been adapted to allied propaganda.
[rest of holocaust revision snipped]
> Homosexual activists are exploiting their agenda through "safe school"
> laws across the nation - and California is their latest laboratory.
[rest of homophobic paranoia snipped]
All I can say is that you're one sick puppy.
- F.M. -