What If There Were No Jews
Borked Pseudo Mailed
Jews, let's all imagine that there were never any Jews. What would the world
look like now? "Now" would not be 2009 but some other date to celebrate
some other god. The Roman Empire would still be governing the world.
What kind of world would that be? Who knows? Would Homosexuality and
prostitution be rampant? Slavery would be here to stay. Remember
homosexuality used to be a very Greek and Roman thing.
There would be no Christianity. The Dark ages would never have happened.
Maybe science would have progressed further along. Life probably would be
more exciting but also much more cruel. and all manner of gross and crude
behavior would be okay to indulge in.
In the big cities, there would be lots of gleaming white marble statues of
naked gods. Also a lot of festivities to celebrate various gods.
There would be no citizenship and immigration problems, since everyone would
be a citizen of one global empire. But then again since slavery would be
rampant, it wouldn't matter for a lot of people..Would the White man be very
racially mixed? In a global empire, the races would indeed be mixed.
The German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzche, thought that the worst thing
that happened to Europe was that Christianity was introduced into it. And
the Jews were responsible for that.
Would the world be better off celebrating idols of non-existent gods? What
about gross and crude sexual behavior? Eating all manner of nasty things?
What about human rights and social justice?
Chief Thracian
<nob...@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
> Remember homosexuality used to be a very Greek and Roman thing.
It's always a very HUMAN thing, dipshit.
> Life probably would be
>more exciting but also much more cruel. and all manner of gross and crude
>behavior would be okay to indulge in.
Hardly. Only violent societies and religions condemn homosexuality.
--
"A government is only as good as its
operating system." - Mighty Mouse Virus
http://tinyurl.com/amlobk
Bee
Maybe God would have used another tribe.
Strabo
> On Sun, 3 May 2009 16:10:51 -0600 (MDT), Borked Pseudo Mailed
> <nob...@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
>> Remember homosexuality used to be a very Greek and Roman thing.
>
> It's always a very HUMAN thing, dipshit.
>
True.
Like many personality disorders the practice of homosexuality is
motivated by willful rebellion and destructive impulses.
>
>> Life probably would be
>> more exciting but also much more cruel. and all manner of gross and crude
>> behavior would be okay to indulge in.
>
> Hardly. Only violent societies and religions condemn homosexuality.
>
Only violent societies tolerate it.
Topaz
Jewish Leaders in the Homosexual Movement
Larry Kramer -- co-founder of "Act Up," a homosexual/AIDS activist
organization; co-founder of the Gay Men's Health Crisis
Alan Klein -- co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer
Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for
the Gay & LesbianAlliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-
founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
Arnie Kantrowitz -- co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against
Defamation [GLAAD].
Jonathan D. Katz -- founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the
largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer
political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San
Francisco branch].
Harvey Fierstein -- film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay
activist.
Moises Kaufman -- playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].
Israel Fishman -- founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now
known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of
the American Library Association], the world's first gay professional
organization.
Bella Abzug and Edward Koch -- both Jewish -- the first members of the
US. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning
discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].
Winnie Stachelberg -- political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]
Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.
Tony Kushner -- gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning
playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].
Len Hirsch -- president of the GLBT federal government employees
group, GLOBE.
Meg Moritz, Ph.D. -- a Director and member of the Executive Committee
of GLAAD.
Barbara Raab -- an NBC-TV producer; a "Jewish lesbian feminist
journalist, writer."
Charles Kaiser [?] -- author & founding member of National Lesbian and
Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].
David Goodstein -- owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate
[1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.
Judy Wieder -- Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.
Alison Bechdel [?] -- cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly
comic strip "Dykes to Watch Out For."
Kevin Koffler -- Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.
Garrett Glaser -- National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association
[NLGJA] national board member.
Ronald Gold -- reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn
the American Psychiatric Association's policy that homosexuality is an
illness.
Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany;
founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific
Humanitarian Committee; coined the term "transvestism"; fled Nazi
Germany.
Fred Hochberg -- deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business
Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].
Michael Berman -- member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors.
Mitchell Gold -- HRC Board
Marty Lieberman -- HRC Board
Andy Linsky -- HRC Board
Dana Perlman -- HRC Board
Abby Rubenfeld -- HRC Board
Andrew Tobias -- HRC Board
Lara Schwartz -- Senior Counsel, HRC
Heather Wellman -- HRC Field Coordinator
Dan Furmansky -- HRC Senior Field Organizer, West
Sally Green -- HRC Associate Field Director
Rick Rosendall [?] -- President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of
Washington, DC.
Barney Frank -- member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-
discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies
Kerry Lobel -- executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task
Force.
Robin Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women's Cultural
Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].
Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and
Education Fund -- and -- the executive director of Freedom to Marry.
Jennifer Einhorn -- Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance
Against Defamation [GLAAD]
Nancy Alpert [?] -- Treasurer, GLAAD
Judy Gluckstern -- Board of Directors, GLAAD.
Stephen M. Jacoby -- Board of Directors, GLAAD.
Matt Riklin -- Board, GLAAD
Carol Rosenfeld -- Board, GLAAD.
William Weinberger -- Board, GLAAD
Tanya Wexler -- Board, GLAAD.
David Huebner -- GLAAD Counsel.
Richard Goldstein -- Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics
Ron Schlittler -- Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of
Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].
Craig Ziskin -- Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.
Debra Weill -- Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.
Dody Goldstein -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
David Horowitz -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Shawn Frank -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Leon Weinstein -- Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.
Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Gayle Rubin -- lesbian author/activist.
Hilary Rosen -- a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund;
former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.
Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.
Bob Kunst -- long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.
"Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network" [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs:
Marty Seldman, president
"National Gay & Lesbian Task Force" [NGLTF].
Board co-chairs: ..... Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M
Dave Fleischer -- Director of Training [political training], NGLTF.
Craig Hoffman -- Board of Directors, NGLTF.
Beth Zemsky -- Board, NGLTF.
Marsha C. Botzer -- Treasurer, NGLTF.
Jeff Levi -- first, Levi was NGTF's lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became
NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.
Bill Rubenstein, J.D. '86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights
Project
Martin Duberman -- author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian
and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.
Ben Schatz '81, J.D. '85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian
Medical Foundation.
Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk
Institute in San Francisco, the world's largest center for queer
studies.
Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist
[one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian
rights organization].
Susan Spielman -- principal/head of Common Ground, an education/
consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation
education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations,
helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author
of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.
Gertrude Stein -- wrote the first openly lesbian novel, "Q.E.D.," in
1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.
Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.
Michael Goff -- founded Out magazine in 1992.
Paulette Goodman -- founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of
PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from
1988-1992.
Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial
Network; president and CEO of out.com.
Jim Levin -- New York gay historian.
Barrett Brick -- GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.
Robin Tyler -- American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the
first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who
was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington
and the national protest coordinator for the "Stop Dr. Laura"
campaign; she produces women's comedy and music festivals, and
operates a lesbian travel-tour company.
Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist,
molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the
use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive
director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa
Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].
Mark Elderkin [?] -- co-founded Gay.com.
Leroy Aarons -- American professor, journalist, and founder of the
National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).
Dr. Donald I. Abrams -- American physician, HIV expert, medical
marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian
Medical Association.
Johnny Abush (1952-2000) -- [Canadian]; archivist of the International
Jewish GBLT Archives.
Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official;
appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and
gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the
Reserves
when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian,
and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its
first president.
Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic
partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].
Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out
Day [October 11th].
Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to
serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS
Policy [ONAP].
Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice
President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that
launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the
Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation
[GLAAD].
Surina Kahn -- American lesbian activist.
Larry Kessler -- founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action
Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in
New England.
Kathy Levinson -- American investor and philanthropist; serves on the
board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.
Judith Light -- actress, activist for gay causes.
David Mixner -- gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the
Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of
wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics;
president Bill Clinton's Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.
Dan Savage -- American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What
Happened
After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards
Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in
America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].
Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager
of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.
Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay &
Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] -- founder and coordinator of the
Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York
chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.
David Sine [?] -- American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian
cable TV network.
Rex Wockner -- longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news
for the gay press since 1985.
Jack Fritscher -- became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine
[1977].
Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender
activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of
Arc to RuPaul].
Allan Ginsburg - late Jewish poet and leading member of North American
Man Boy Love Association
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Dave Heil
> Jewish Leaders in the Homosexual Movement
C'mon, Topie, don't be shy. Tell us about that pudgy Nazi bundle of
homosexuality and drugs, Hermann Goering.
Dave Heil
Topaz
The National Socialists made a movie called "The Eternal Jew". Anyone
can see their movie and see that one of the main reasons they were
against the Jews was because the Jews were promoting homosexual
perversion in the media. Here is an article they made about the movie:
"The self-portrait Jewry offered the world was disgusting from the
beginning. All that is overshadowed by the powerful examples in this
new and most valuable film, The Eternal Jew. This film with its
persuasive power must be shown everywhere where anti-Semitism is still
questioned. No one will will fail to shudder at the sneaking servility
and dirty bartering of the Jews when they start out, at the perfidy,
insidiousness and vulgarity of their methods, at the brutality and
all-devouring hatred they exhibit when they reach their goal and
control finance.
The most revolting scenes show Jewish slaughtering methods. These
customs, which cast a particularly vivid spotlight on the so-called
Jewish religion, are so terrible that it is hard to watch the film as
the grinning Jewish butchers carry out their work. It is illuminating
to see how stubbornly Jewry holds to its method of slaughter and with
which casuistry it defends it against the horror of the civilized
world. Rarely will people feel more horror than which watching the
desperate and horrible death struggle of the slaughtered animals. Long
before the seizure of power, the NSDAP fought against Jewish
slaughter. National Socialist representatives in parliament repeatedly
introduced legislation to abolish this form of animal torture through
a ban on Jewish slaughter. Such proposals were always rejected, since
the entire Jewish and Jewish-influenced press ran long articles
against them and the so-called German parties refused to support
National Socialism in its battle against this evil.
Not only in this regard, but in other areas too we are reminded with a
shudder of what once was reality in Germany: the power of the Jews in
the economy, finance, culture, theater, film, publishing, press,
radio, education and politics. All these Jewish leaders of the Weimar
era had their home or their origin in the filthy ghettos of the East.
One has a deep sense of salvation after seeing this film. We have
broken their power over us. We are the initiators of the fight against
world Jewry, which now directs its hate, its brutal greed and
destructive will toward us. We must win this battle for ourselves, for
Europe, for the world. This film will be a valuable tool in that
struggle."
Michael Ejercito
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Topaz
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
is. He united State and Nation in Germany.
Only the eye-witness, who has experienced day by day, at the side of
Adolf Hitler, the wave of love and enthusiasm which greets him from
every class of German, can realize that such ovations, so rare in the
life of statesmen, signify no artificial feeling, but genuine
affection.. Hundreds, thousands throng the streets and roads, and
surge toward his car.. The scenes which we witness day by day are
touching and heart-rending. They are not isolated examples, but occur
everywhere.
The history of the National Socialist Movement shall be handed down to
posterity as the epic of the resurrected German Nation.
With indomitable will and unprecedented perseverance, which no
reverse can dishearten, this previously unknown man of the people,
with a few faithful adherents, dared to pierce the lines of the
Marxist terror.. He knows; terror is not overcome by intellect, but by
terror.
Adolf Hitler was not permitted to speak in public. The party lacked
the most essential means. It's existence during the following years -
probably the most arduous of its life - was one long series of
persecutions, muzzling, and trickery. Whoever admitted National
Socialism, was banished from civil life, from the decadent bourgeoisie
and from the class-conscious workers. The mere suspicion of National
Socialism meant the loss of employment and bread, boycott and ruin of
business interests, the inevitable acceptance of misery.
Hundreds, thousands were imprisoned by the November State Government.
Throughout the streets raged bloodshed and scenes of Marxist terror.
All the powers of hell were let loose against the advancing young
movement.
After twelve years of inconceivably laborious preparation, the
N.S.D.A.P. felt strong enough to knock at the door of power in the
Reich
But strong elements of economic opposition were still prevalent, and
these he attacked at the beginning of 1932.
Even today, I can picture this meeting of prominent men. We came for
Godesberg, and drove up to the Park Hotel, amidst the hooting of the
Marxists. The room was over crowded. Huddled together, sat the chief
West German magnates. There were familiar and unfamiliar faces. Men in
the public eye , and those quiet , but no less influential powers,
who, moving behind the scenes, control the fate of economy by the soft
sounds issuing from their private offices- men said to bear a ledger
rather than a heart.
Joyful expectation brightened the faces of those already converted.
But the vast majority bore an air of superiority and cool reserve-
probably flattered that Hitler had approached them. Mere curiosity,
and general interest lured them to the meeting. They wanted to hear
Hitler speak. They had no intention of being converted; the came to
criticize, seeking confirmation of their own infallible opinion.
Our leader received a chilly ovation; he spoke from a slightly raised,
projecting balustrade, he hands resting lightly on the iron railing. I
sat, amongst the listeners, taking notes, and observing the effect of
his speech which lasted for over two hours. From world political
perspective and with cogent logic, out leader elucidated the relations
between economy and politics, their reciprocal effect, and their
results in Germany. He explained the cause of the situation , and
proposed the only possible remedy.
The general impression upon this group of most impassive listeners was
astounding. After an hour, their chilly reserve gave way to intense
interest. Hitler spoke of the titanic struggle of his political
warriors, needy and persecuted, but making every sacrifice, even that
of life, for their nation. He contrasted the German youth's unselfish
idealism, personified in National Socialism, and the noble character
of working-class followers, with the lack of comprehension, the
materialism, and the heavy guilt of the purely economically
established Bourgeoisie. He pricked their social conscience without
causing offence.
They began to flush, fixed their gaze upon out Leader's lips, and it
seemed as if their hearts were moved. He spoke to their very souls.
Faint, then thundering applause greeted Hitler at the conclusion of
his speech; he had won a battle.
The Jewish and Marxist Press lied boldly next day that Hitler had
feasted with the industrial magnates on champagne and lobsters.
Actually, a few minutes later, the night say us on the road again,
bent on fresh work.
Next day, Hitler addressed with equal success the Crefeld Silk
magnates in Godesberg. Later the national club in Hamburg. Everywhere,
the scene was the same.
Those were daring journeys, fraught with danger, through the very
strongholds of the Marxist potentates who were on the track of their
hated, sworn foe.
But Adolf Hitler fought his way through. The number-plate of his car
was smeared with oil and coated with dust- quite indiscernible.
Then we held our first meeting in Goerlitz, where the attendance
exceeded the hundred thousand figure. All the roads were crowed with
masses of people on foot, on bicycles, and in lorries, all with the
same destination.
Hitler spoke as the stars arose in the heavens, and amidst the flaring
torches.
Now the crowds recognized the luminous plane carrying our leader, who
had just devoted his time to them. Cheers broke out from a hundred
thousand throats, drowning even the thunder of our motors, whilst the
crowds brandished flaming torches in greeting.
We have experienced the following fact; In Germany, wherever economic
and moral distress was greatest, wherever things seemed most
intolerable, there, confidence in our leader was strongest, and
gripped all the people.
Wherever our leader approached, every man and woman came out. Crowds
lined the streets. Aged grandmothers, on whose distressed faces the
direst poverty was written, raised their arms in greeting. Wherever we
stopped, the women stretched out their children towards our leader.
There were tears of joy and emotion.
They used to meet upon the Platterhof. Adolf Hitler would often come
in the night fog to the Platterhof, to take counsel with his friends.
The "Conservative State Idea" appropriated our ideas. The most ancient
political mummies of the past suddenly appeared upon the scene, and,
without shame, claimed the credit for out previous successes.
The Youth stood by Hitler, because it knew that he personified the
Nation's Youth. From the beginning, our leader had valued most highly
the immense importance of Youth for the movement. Not the old
generation, but a rising generation, uncorrupted by the destructive
poison of the world ideas of the ruling classes, could bear the new
Germany upon its shoulders.
Finally, on 30th January, 1933, our leader made the short drive over
the Wilhelmsplatz to the Reichskanzler's Office. Amidst boundless
cheers. The seige was over, the fortress had fallen, the gates lay
open.
The political lie had played a prominent role in all epochs of
parliamentary history. But such accumulations of lies and defamations
as our opponents have hurled against the awakening young Germany in
the course of our 13 years' struggle have not been experienced.
What National Socialist's blood does not boil, if he recalls the rapid
fire of press lies, that witches Sabbath of infernal songs of hatred,
which burst upon the National Socialist Movement every day?
The activity of the Marxist Press against National Socialism, by means
of profligacy, unscrupulous lies and base agitation of the public,
stands unrivalled throughout the press of the whole world.
But this systematic lying campaign of our opponents was always the
best evidence of the moral weakness of their own position. The more
desperate their situation was, the more unscrupulous became their
press agitation.
The agitation of the Jewish-Marxist Press against the N.S.D.A.P., has
been such an essential ingredient of our opponents' struggle during
all these years, that we would be guilty of historical forgery if we
did not lay due stress upon this lying campaign in our description of
the events.
The National Socialist Party has re-united people and State, it has
restored the people to the State, and the State to the people. In this
way, an organism, complete within itself, and comprising every
function of the life of the community, was born from the Nation
itself, in the midst of a decadent people and a corrupt State.
In Nuremberg, the Party represented the German people and the German
State, before the eyes of the whole world. This was a more complete, a
more morally dignified, and a more imposing representation than the
State and Nation have ever previously enjoyed.
If proves the recognition that a new valuation of men, a valuation
based upon the laws of nature, is beginning to force its way through
from the hearts of the European Nations. It is about to overcome
Liberalism, and replace it by a new conception of the living
community.
The democratic, parliamentary Liberalism apodictically claimed for
itself the eternal title of the most purposeful and best form of
representation of the peoples rights. At last with its own eyes, the
Nation has recognized National Socialism as the organization of
naturally chosen leaders. National Socialism's achievements in the
fields of Socialism, Economy, Administration, and Reformation of the
Reich, speak for themselves. In one sweep, these leaders have
accomplished what dozens of previous parliamentary, democratic
governments vainly attempted in the most deplorable way.
Probably it is an act of justice and compensation, that the German
Nation, so sorely afflicted by the world-war, is chosen to lead the
way to a better future for the nations.
Michael Ejercito
> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> Otto Dietrich
>
> The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
> immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
> soul.
Michael
Dave Heil
> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> Otto Dietrich
Ven der Fuehrer says, "Ve iss der master race"
Ve HEIL!{honk} HEIL!{honk} Right in Der Fuehrer's face
Not to luff Der Fuehrer iss a great disgrace
So ve HEIL!{honk} HEIL!{honk} Right in Der Fuehrer's face
Ven Herr Goebbels says,"Ve own der vorld und space,"
Ve HEIL!{honk} HEIL!{honk} Right in Herr Goebbel's face
Ven Herr Goering says,"Dey'll never bomb dis place
Ve HEIL!{honk} HEIL!{honk} Right in Herr Goering's face
Iss ve not der Supermen?
Aryan-pure Supermen?
Ja! Ve iss der Supermen!
Super-duper Supermen!
Iss der Nutzi Land so goot?
Vould you leave it if you could?
Ja! Dis Nutzi Land iss goot!
Ve vould-a leave it-a if-a ve could!
Ve bring der world new order!
Heil Hitler's new world order!
Evry'one of foreign race
Vill luff der Fuehrer's face
Ven ve bring to der world disorder!
Topaz
Some Nazis may have said "Herrenvolk"
"'Herrenvolk' can be translated into "noble race" and/or "superior
race". Yet for some reason the English speaking translators chose and
made popular the term 'master race.'"
Heidi
The speeches of Nazis are known. All you have to do is put "Hitler
speeches" or "Goebbels Speeches" in your search engine. But apparantly
"master race" is not to be found in them anywhere.
Mein Kampf says some clearly true things such as this:
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself
to the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must
one day become ruler of the Earth."
Mein Kampf also mentions the colonies and how Whites were the
rulers and the most advanced race. But there is no indication that
Hitler wanted to mistreat the darker people.
Hitler and the National Socialists stood for leadership, but against
any kind of "master" with whip in hand. One of the reasons they put
"Socialist" in their name was to make this kind of thing clear.
Goebbels wrote:
"The German nation will be the intellectual leader of civilized
humanity."
Joseph Goebbels, "Das Jahr 2000," Das Reich, 25 February 1945, pp.
1-2.
Michael Ejercito
> Goebbels wrote:
> "The German nation will be the intellectual leader of civilized
> humanity."
> Joseph Goebbels, "Das Jahr 2000," Das Reich, 25 February 1945, pp.
> 1-2.
Michael
Gershom
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:q5h605pujpgnilu5m...@4ax.com...
Present day Germans still have the oppportunities to be intellectual
leaders. Nothing stopping them.
I should remind you that Jews set themselves apart a long time ago so that
they too could be intellectual (and moral) leaders of civilized humanity.
Civilized humanity also implies the concepts of justice and mercy, wisdom
and understaning.
These are the core values of the Jewish religion.
Dave Heil
> Some Nazis may have said "Herrenvolk"
...but most simply went on saying "Herringvolk" or Herring people.
Dave Heil
Rex Ballard
wrote:
> Since a lot of people in these newsgroups think our problems are caused by
> Jews, let's all imagine that there were never any Jews. What would the world
> look like now? "Now" would not be 2009 but some other date to celebrate
> some other god. The Roman Empire would still be governing the world.
Actually, if there were no Jews, that is if there had never been the
Exodus, there would have been no Roman Empire. The Roman culture was
based on Greek culture, the Greek culture based on Babylonian
influences, and all of these were heavily influenced by Jewish
communities thriving within them.
During the Babylonian Exile, the Jews, now displaced from their
homeland, preserved their culture, religeon, and technology, teaching
each child to read and write in Hebrew. Later, the Septuagint was
translated to Greek, so that Jews in Greek occupied territories could
know the culture of their forfathers.
This teaching of reading and writing made Jews very popular as
teachers, especially since many of the concepts in the Torah were
principles that were good for any leader, and helped many leaders
organize their kingdoms and empires.
So without the Jews, it is quite likely that Europe and Asia would
still be lots of little fifedoms, fighting and raiding each other,
with no clear distringuished leaders, because each leader would have
been limited in how much he could govern before losing his power to
other rivals.
Without the Jews, we might have never gotten out of the "Dark Ages"
where there were no kings, no laws, and viking like tribes would
simply plunder the farms shortly after the harvest.
Without the Kosher laws, there would have been no study of health and
disease control, so diseases ranging from food poisening to sexually
transmitted diseases to genetic disorders resulting from inbreeding
would have wiped out huge populations almost any time people attempted
to gather into cities. There would have been no aquaducts, no sewers,
and no sanitation. Even small towns would become deadly places.
Farms would be scattered, and each farmer would have avoided his
neighbors for fear of getting infected or cursed.
If civilization had formed, it might have been more likely that there
would have been no Agustus, and many more like Caligula and Nero,
perhaps many centuries of despots and men corrupted by their own
power. There would have been no Solomon to Aspire to.
AndrewJH
wrote:
No Jews?
There were be no modern medicine, no science, lousy two bit
ineffectual lawyers and no community minded businessmen. Just jealous
racist dimbulbs is all we would have left.
AndrewJH
>
> read more »
You sure got a lot of posts. Blah, Blah, Blah. I guess you don't
have time for a job?
Tim Miller
> On May 4, 4:33 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Jewish Leaders in the Homosexual Movement
>>
>
> You sure got a lot of posts. Blah, Blah, Blah. I guess you don't
> have time for a job?
Like most of his neonazi brethren, he's a lying,
unemployable glue-sniffer...
Benj
Exactly. The irony is that back in the late 1930s Germany actually WAS
the "intellectual leader of civilized humanity" But thanks to Goebbels
and his pals they managed to take Germany from center of the universe
to shit pile in a few years. Yes, Virginia, the quality of your
leadership DOES make a difference for your future. Think about it.
Benj
> I should remind you that Jews set themselves apart a long time ago so that
> they too could be intellectual (and moral) leaders of civilized humanity.
> Civilized humanity also implies the concepts of justice and mercy, wisdom
> and understaning.
> These are the core values of the Jewish religion.
Yes they are, which raises the whole issue of what Marx called "the
jewish Question".
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/index.htm
According to Marx the "Jewish Question" is to ask how my the Jew be
separated from those very core religious values to find secular
political leadership. In other words the "question" for Marx was how
to "convert" Jews from Judaism to secular rationality. And this has
become the crux of Jewish problems with Jewish society separating
itself into two groups one secular and one religious. Non-Jewish
societies alarmed by some of the activities of the Secular group have
created oppositions for all Jews because of their lazy failure to make
a distinction between the two groups. These problems still persist in
spite of Marx's theories being widely discredited today even among his
believers. [Democrats in the U.S. being one of the few exceptions and
remain true believers]
Benj
wrote:
Obviously you bullies have nothing of value to say. Once HR 1966
passes we can at least throw the likes of you in jail for two years
for every post like this.
If you have any information or intelligence, you can demonstrate it
here by pointing out just who on "Mr. Topaz's" list is either not a
Jew nor prominent in the movement for GLBT "rights". I will make
careful note of his errors. "Proof" by calling him a liar and
"unemployable glue-sniffer" doesn't give us much to go on, does it,
since your opinion seems to have next to nothing to back it up.
Topaz
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
Topaz
Obviously, Germany was destroyed by the evil allies.
England's Guilt
by Joseph Goebbels
It is a major error to assume that England's plutocrats slipped into
the war against their will or even against their intentions. The
opposite is true. The English warmongers wanted the war and used all
the resources at their disposal over the years to bring it about. They
surely were not surprised by the war. English plutocracy had no goal
other than to unleash war against Germany at the right moment, and
this since Germany first began to seek once again to be a world power.
Poland really had little to do with the outbreak of war between the
Reich and England. It was only a means to an end. England did not
support the Polish government out of principle or for humanitarian
reasons. That is clear from the fact that England gave Poland no help
of any kind whatsoever when the war began. Nor did England take any
measures against Russia. The opposite, in fact. The London warring
clique to this day has tried to bring Russia into the campaign of
aggression against Germany.
The encirclement of Germany long before the outbreak of the war was
traditional English policy. From the beginning, England has always
directed its main military might against Germany. It never could
tolerate a strong Reich on the Continent. It justified its policy by
claiming that it wanted to maintain a balance of forces in Europe.
Today there is still another reason. The English warmongers conceal
it. It is crassly egotistic. The English prime minister announced the
day the war began that England's goal was to destroy Hitlerism.
However, he defined Hitlerism in a way other than how the English
plutocracy actually sees it. The English warmongers claim that
National Socialism wants to conquer the world. No nation is secure
against German aggression. An end must be made of the German hunger
for power. The limit came in the conflict with Poland. In reality,
however, there is another reason for England's war with Germany. The
English warmongers cannot seriously claim that Germany wants to
conquer the world, particularly in view of the fact that England
controls nearly two thirds of the world. And Germany since 1933 has
never threatened English interests.
So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in
this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is
speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees
Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn
in the eye of English plutocracy.
England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people's
state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest
land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact
the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of
this wealth. We see in England an army of millions of impoverished,
socially enslaved and oppressed people. Child labor is still a matter
of course there. They have only heard about social welfare programs.
Parliament occasionally discusses social legislation. Nowhere else is
there such terrible and horrifying inequality as in the English slums.
Those with good breeding take no notice of it. Should anyone speak of
it in public, the press, which serves plutocratic democracy, quickly
brands him the worst kind of rascal. They do not hesitate from making
major changes in the Constitution if they are necessary to preserve
capitalist democracy.
Capitalism democracy suffers from every possible modern social
ailment. The Lords and City people can remain the richest people one
earth only because they constantly maintain their wealth by exploiting
their colonies and preserving unbelievable poverty in their own
country.
Germany, on the other hand, has based its domestic policies on new and
modern social principles. That is why it is a danger to English
plutocracy. It is also why English capitalists want to destroy
Hitlerism. They see Hitlerism as all the generous social reforms that
have occurred in Germany since 1933. The English plutocrats rightly
fear that good things are contagious, that they could endanger English
capitalism.
That is why England declared war on Germany. Since it was accustomed
to letting others fight its wars, it looked to the European continent
to find those ready to fight for England's interests. France was ready
to take on this degrading duty, since the same kind of people ruled
France. They too were ready for war out of egotistic reasons. Western
European democracy is really only a Western European plutocracy that
rules the world. It declared war on German socialism because it
endangered their capitalist interests.
A similar drama began in 1914. England had more luck during those four
and a half years than it is having today. Europe's nations had no
chance to see what was happening. The nations of Europe today have no
desire to play the same role they played during the World War. England
and France stand alone. Still, England is trying once again to wage
war without making any personal sacrifice. The goal is to blockade
Germany, to gradually bring it to submit by starvation. That is
longstanding English policy. They used it successfully in the
Napoleonic wars, and also during the World War. It would work now as
well, if the German people had not been educated by National
Socialism. National Socialism is immune to English temptations.
English propaganda lies no longer work in Germany. They have gradually
lost their effectiveness in the rest of the world as well, since
German propaganda today reaches far beyond its borders. This time,
English plutocracy will not succeed in driving a wedge between the
German people and their leadership, though that is their goal.
The German nation today is defending not only its honor and
independence, but also the great social accomplishments it has made
through hard and untiring work since 1933. It is a people's state
built on the foundation of justice and economic good sense. In the
past, England always had the advantage of facing a fragmented Germany.
It is only natural that English plutocracy today seeks to split the
German people and make it ripe for new collapse.
English lying propaganda can no longer name things by their proper
names. It therefore claims that it is not fighting the German people,
only Hitlerism. But we know this old song. In South Africa, England
was not fighting the Boers, only Krugerism. In the World War, England
wanted to destroy Kaiserism, not the German people. But that did not
stop English plutocracy from brutally and relentlessly suppressing the
Boers after that war or the Germans after our defeat.
A child once burned is twice shy. The German people were once victims
of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It
has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind
all English plutocratic capitalism's fine words, its aim is to destroy
Germany's social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have
build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and
spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact
on the German people.
English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the
past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the
English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City
men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers and
soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at
their disposal.
We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy
forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have
to pay for it.
The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the
capitalist methods of the 19th Century. The peoples have matured. They
will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are
the cause of their misery.
It is no accident that National Socialism has the historical task of
carrying out this reckoning. Plutocracy is collapsing intellectually,
spiritually, and in the not too distant future, militarily. We are
acting consistently with Nietzsche's words: "Give a shove to what is
falling."
Topaz
The Jewish Agenda
By Phaedrus
Here's what they're up to:
The progressive elimination of all national borders world-wide.
Elimination of foreign currency exchange controls world-wide to aid
unimpeded capital flight.
The imposition of the preferred Jewish method of control - so called
'democracy' - around the world then engineering the installation of
compliant governments who are nothing more than puppets of Zionist
control.
Total control of television, radio, newspapers, periodicals, magazines
and advertising.
The promotion of inter-breeding between disparate races through
pervasive media suggestion and political dogma.
The encouragement of unsustainable levels of immigration in Europe and
the United States, whether legal or not and regardless of the worth of
the immigrants involved or their likely contribution to Western
economies.
Direct control of international finance and banking.
The formation of ever-larger eco-political blocs and free-trade
regions with uniform rules and standards that will one day all be
merged to form the One World Government, which they of course will
control.
The propagation of the mind virus that 'political correctness' is the
enlightened, modern way to go and its rejectionists as in some way
wicked and bigoted or at the very least woefully old-fashioned.
The crushing of any form of dissent against the implementation of the
New World Order.
Stricter gun control measures in the United States with the aim of
eventually disarming the people altogether.
The promotion via their media holdings of homosexuality, mixed-race
relationships and any other forms of aberrant and socially damaging
behavior.
Engendering the idea through media control that blacks are superior to
what they really are and that whites are in fact, inferior to what
they really are.
The idea that homosexuals and lesbians should be proud of what they
are and AIDS is nothing to be ashamed of any more.
The restriction of free expression on the Internet.
The propagation of the concept of 'Hate Crime' - reminiscent of George
Orwell's 'Thought Crime' in his prescient, dystopian novel, Nineteen
Eighty-Four.
The encouragement of under-age sex preferably between children of
different races through their numerous teenage magazine titles (theft
of childhood and innocence).
Elimination of trade barriers and the creation of a global,
business-friendly trading environment giving rise to massive job
losses in Europe and America.
The debasement of traditional family values and the destruction of the
family unit.
To ridicule and debase Christianity and anyone who dares uphold moral
values.
To campaign for the intolerance of 'racism' and 'homophobia.'
The promotion of "Affirmative Action" type programs that put the
interests of hopelessly incompetent blacks ahead of struggling, hard
working white people.
The stimulation of inter-tribal violence between Arabs.
The generation of inter-cultural tensions in countries that have
adopted Jew-promoted 'multiculturalism.'
The expansion of a 'Greater Israel' into what remains of Palestine.
And we allow these poisonous rodents to shape our perceptions for us??
We MUST be mad. In the future, after the forthcoming struggle is won,
no Jew must ever be allowed within a million miles of a transmitter or
a printing press - NEVER - for as long as mankind survives.
http://worldpeace-phaedrus.blogspot.com/2007/12/that-jewish-agenda-in-full.html
Topaz
wrote:
>Present day Germans still have the oppportunities to be intellectual
>leaders. Nothing stopping them.
"They turned Germany into a permanent slave of the Jews after World
War II. We can't criticize the Jews. We can't examine the REAL
historic background of the so-called Holocaust. And we are forced to
read Jewish-controlled newspapers, we must watch Jewish-controlled TV
shows and we must pay, pay and pay them, this will never end.
Remember, whenever a German tries some kind of critic, he's branded a
nazi. Whenever a German hits someone not-German, he's branded a nazi.
Whenever we are proud of our nation, we're nazis. And being branded a
nazi means to be an outcast, even a criminal. A "swastika" is
forbidden.
Showing nazi symbols can mean prison. If you have doubts about the
"Holocaust", you will go to prison. Freedom of Speech? Not at all.
Exactly this will happen to Iran if Israel and the US ever invade the
country. You will NEVER be free again. You'll be slaves forever.
Don't let it happen. Hitler was so right about the Jews. They are the
most treacherous race on this planet. There is a reason nobody likes
them, except their "host", the USA."
Horst Wessel
>I should remind you that Jews set themselves apart a long time ago so that
>they too could be intellectual (and moral) leaders of civilized humanity.
>Civilized humanity also implies the concepts of justice and mercy, wisdom
>and understaning.
>These are the core values of the Jewish religion.
>
Here is a quote from The Riddle of the Jew's Success:
Many people consider themselves very clever when they impart advice to
the merchant, who complains he is unable to hold his own against the
Jews: do the same as the Jew! In reality this amounts to the
following: do no recognize any religious motives whatever in your mode
of doing business, and descend to the level of a low money-grubber and
voluptary.
The economic principle of the Jew threatens to trample under foot, in
our time, all the higher principles of life.
The Riddle of the Jew's Success
F. Roderich-Stoltheim (T. Fritsch)
This rare and valuable book provides a detailed analysis of Jewish
behavior and thinking. A reprint of the English-language edition of
1927. After Germany's defeat in 1945, this book was banned by the
Allied occupation authorities, and nearly all copies were destroyed.
Written by the influential German publicist Theodor Fritsch, it
appeared under a pen name. This book helps in understanding the scope
and intensity of anti-Jewish feeling in Germany during the 1920s and
1930s.
Topaz
Topaz
FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western country at
one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France, Portugal and
Germany.
FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks,
newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled
by Jews.
FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime
(such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number
of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR
MORE FREQUENTLY.
FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top
communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all
the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by
Wall Street Jews.
FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of
destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.
FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remained in
charge of the organization till 1970.
FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false,
(and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the
Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous
Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories
acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of
homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings
and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six
Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these
widely-believed but false stories is illegal in most countries of the
Western world, and 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for
questioning these and similar dogmas. Can you figure out what powerful
international ethnic group was responsible for causing these laws to
be passed?
FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the
Holocaust has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion
dollars to Israel by the German government. Furthermore, Jews
everywhere continue to use the Holocaust as a tool for extracting
money from gentiles, whether thru the movies (more than 400 have been
made on this subject), Holocaust museums, 'reparations' (more than a
billion from the Swiss, billions from German companies, etc) and the
like. There is a saying widely used among Jews which goes, "There's no
business like Shoah [Holocaust] business." Can you figure out why the
Jewish establishment has been so eager to suppress questioning of the
Holocau$$$t dogma?
FACT: Israel is the only 'Western' country to legally sanction
torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and
shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters.
FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force
attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms
enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the
major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the
Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify
freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for
suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers
of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American
culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts.
Source
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/Lbl-VitalFactsYouNeedToKnow.html
Dave Heil
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
Yep, the National Socialists.
Goebbels, killed his wife and children before taking his own life.
They ended up being burned beyond recognition Considering what they did
to the Jews, it was rather a fitting end.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
And what failed? National Socialism. Nazi Germany is no more. England
just keeps plodding along. The evil, club-footed Goebbels took the
coward's way out, killing his family and taking his own life. His line
ended.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Thu, 7 May 2009 18:07:52 -0500, "Gershom" <som...@noone.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Present day Germans still have the oppportunities to be intellectual
>> leaders. Nothing stopping them.
>
>
> "They turned Germany into a permanent slave of the Jews after World
> War II. We can't criticize the Jews. We can't examine the REAL
> historic background of the so-called Holocaust. And we are forced to
> read Jewish-controlled newspapers, we must watch Jewish-controlled TV
> shows and we must pay, pay and pay them, this will never end.
>
> Remember, whenever a German tries some kind of critic, he's branded a
> nazi. Whenever a German hits someone not-German, he's branded a nazi.
> Whenever we are proud of our nation, we're nazis. And being branded a
> nazi means to be an outcast, even a criminal. A "swastika" is
> forbidden.
>
> Showing nazi symbols can mean prison. If you have doubts about the
> "Holocaust", you will go to prison. Freedom of Speech? Not at all.
> Exactly this will happen to Iran if Israel and the US ever invade the
> country. You will NEVER be free again. You'll be slaves forever.
> Don't let it happen. Hitler was so right about the Jews. They are the
> most treacherous race on this planet. There is a reason nobody likes
> them, except their "host", the USA."
>
> Horst Wessel
Well, old Horst should have remembered that it was the Nazis who invaded
their neighbor states. The Nazis conceived and began carrying out the
"Final Solution". I'm afraid a few more generations will have to pass
before Germany loses the stink.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> The Jewish Agenda
> By Phaedrus
>
> Here's what they're up to:
>
> The progressive elimination of all national borders world-wide.
Nope.
> Elimination of foreign currency exchange controls world-wide to aid
> unimpeded capital flight.
Nah!
> The imposition of the preferred Jewish method of control - so called
> 'democracy' - around the world then engineering the installation of
> compliant governments who are nothing more than puppets of Zionist
> control.
Oh? Do you mean like where the people get to vote for the those they'd
like to run their country? If the Jews are for that, I'm with them.
After all, the United States operates that way.
> Total control of television, radio, newspapers, periodicals, magazines
> and advertising.
> The promotion of inter-breeding between disparate races through
> pervasive media suggestion and political dogma.
Manure!
> The encouragement of unsustainable levels of immigration in Europe and
> the United States, whether legal or not and regardless of the worth of
> the immigrants involved or their likely contribution to Western
> economies.
We need young workers to pay Social Security taxes and income taxes,
Topie. Otherwise, you won't be able to live out your days being cared
for by blacks and Jews at the Old Nazis Home.
> Direct control of international finance and banking.
Somebody has to control international finance and banking. Countries
have been handling it pretty well without your help.
> The formation of ever-larger eco-political blocs and free-trade
> regions with uniform rules and standards that will one day all be
> merged to form the One World Government, which they of course will
> control.
Ah, that conspiracy thing. Aren't you forgetting that if your Nazi idol
had won World War II, we'd have already had world government?
> The propagation of the mind virus that 'political correctness' is the
> enlightened, modern way to go and its rejectionists as in some way
> wicked and bigoted or at the very least woefully old-fashioned.
Topie, you are the poster boy for bigoted and wicked.
> The crushing of any form of dissent against the implementation of the
> New World Order.
> Stricter gun control measures in the United States with the aim of
> eventually disarming the people altogether.
What stricter controls, Topie. I can pass a background check. Can't you?
> The promotion via their media holdings of homosexuality, mixed-race
> relationships and any other forms of aberrant and socially damaging
> behavior.
Again, Topie, I'd rather have two gay florists living next door than
some tattooed skinhead.
> Engendering the idea through media control that blacks are superior to
> what they really are and that whites are in fact, inferior to what
> they really are.
I hate to be the one to break it to you. You really are inferior to
some people. In fact, I believe you to be inferior to a whole lot of
people. Whiter is no guarantee of brighter.
Dave Heil
Bee
So might makes right. How "Dubya".
Bee
That's an interesting read and, to be sure, Jews have made some valuable
contributions to humanity. You assume, though, that if not the Jews, God
would not have "chosen" another tribe.
Bee
And that's fine, Gershom, would that Jews live by those concepts. There
are many examples where they don't, such as Zionism, radical politics,
attempts to limit free speech & etc.
Topaz
During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.
But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by H�ss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. H�ss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling
still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made to walk
completely nude
through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>
An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at
Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he
refused to
cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He
came in the winter
of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls
Mr. Jones. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell
to help break
him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and
day, armed with
axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to
help break down
his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�ss was taken out for exercise
he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and
nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full
confession to
the authorities.
</quote>
The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.
The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."
The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:
"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."
Topaz
Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
countries, the USA and the USSR, and still it was a close fight. The
good side almost won.
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
"Can we doubt but that Poland was encouraged to ignore the German note
of March which set forth eminently reasonable suggestions for a
peaceful solution of the problem of the Corridor?
Month after month no reply was vouchsafed by Poland to the German
note. Meanwhile, insult and outrage occurred with suspicious frequency
all along the German frontier, similar to the technique to which the
Jews later introduced the British in Palestine. Day after day the
British public was deluged with war propaganda and misrepresentation
of the situation. Finally their minds were closed against any further
regard to the demands of justice and reason by a new slogan, "You
cannot trust Hitler's word." With this lie the British public was
finally stampeded into throwing all reason and judgement to the winds
and accepting at their face value the war propaganda in the press.
This slogan was founded upon a misrepresentation of Hitler's
assurance given on more than one occasion after a "putsch" such as
that in into Sudetenland, that he "intended to make no further
demands.". The misrepresentation lay in the fact that the press
steadily obscured the major fact, that the "demands" to which Hitler
referred were all along five-fold in character; and covered those five
areas taken from Germany by a dictated peace in which the population
was overwhelmingly German, i.e. Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia,
parts of Poland, the Corridor and Danzig.
As German troops occupied each successive section, it is, I
believe, accurate to say that Hitler declared, that he had no
additional demands to make. But here it must be clearly stated in the
interests of justice that he never said that this entailed reducing
the demands which he had originally very clearly delineated, and
repeated on many occasions, namely, the five areas in question.
"The British public was deluded by its press into supposing that
when Hitler said he had no further demands, that there had never been
any statement of his full demands, some of which were still
unfulfilled. They were led to believe that Hitler either never had had
other demands, or that he had abondoned the rest as soon as he had
obtained some of them. When, therefore, the next installment was
added, the press built on this misunderstanding the fallacy that
Hitler's word could not be trusted. Honest dealing needs no such
trickery and and deception. Such methods are only necessary to bolster
up bad or unjust causes. Fortunately we have the calm and
disspassionate judgement in this matter by no less a person than the
late Lord Lothian, recently British Ambassador to the U.S.A. In his
last speech at Chatham House on this subject he remarked: "If the
principle of self-determination had been applied in Germany's favour,
as it was applied agaisnt her, it would have meant the return of the
Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Polish Corridor and
Danzig to the Reich."
Here is a very different presentment of the case to the one which
was foisted upon the British public in 1939: and it is the true one.
Small wonder that these facts had to be withheld from the ordinary
citizen.
Had the British public realized the truth, that each of these
demands of Hilter rested on a foundation of reasonable fairness, the
people of this island would have ruled out any question of war; and it
was war, not truth or justice, upon which international Jewry was
resolved."
Here is another quote from the book:
"The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter
to Mr. Balfour (see page 25), denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan,
which if not checked by the combined action of the European powers,
would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration. By the end of
that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities
of Europe. In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organized and maintained for
some time a merciless and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia.
In Germany the Jews, Liebknecht, Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg,
etc., made a desperate bid for power. These and other similar
convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own way just
frustated the onslaughts.
In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in the
endeavour to expose the true nature of these evils. Only in one,
however, did a political leader and group arise, who grasped to the
full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind the
mobs of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world
Jewry. This leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National
Socialist Party of Germany.
Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organized
revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact.
We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded
over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of
supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men
everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for
themselves. Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek
truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which
they cannot shirk.
To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentaions of a
Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer
idleness, if for no worse reason."
Topaz
Democracy is a cruel joke when the Jews control the media.
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation
with the average voter."
Winston Churchill
"Jewry rules from behind the mask of democracy. What one calls
democracy today is concealed Jewish domination. Jews determine what
happens in the democratic states"
Julius Streicher, Der St�rmer, #34/1939.
"A couple of weeks ago I quoted a few sentences from a book published
in 1928 titled Propaganda, by ... Edward Bernays. Today I'll read to
you an expanded set of excerpts from Bernays' book to give you a
little more of the gist of his message. I quote:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits
and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic
society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society
constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of
our country.
"We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes are formed, our
ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of. This is a
logical result of the way in which our democratic society is
organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner
if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. . . .
"Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it
remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in
the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our
ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of
persons . . . who understand the mental processes and social patterns
of the masses.
It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who
harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the
world. . .
"No serious sociologist believes any longer that the voice of the
people expresses any divine or especially wise and lofty idea. The
voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is
made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by those
persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. . . .
"Whether in the problem of getting elected to office or in the problem
of interpreting and popularizing new issues, or in the problem of
making the day-to-day administration of public affairs a vital part of
the community life, the use of propaganda, carefully adjusted to the
mentality of the masses, is an essential adjunct of political life." -
end of quote -
I should mention that Bernays' book is not profound or especially
valuable in itself. It merely states a few self-evident facts about
the way in which a modern society works. For the person interested in
propaganda, far more useful books are available. The fact that Bernays
was a Jew is not even especially relevant here except to emphasize
that propaganda, the mass media, psychology, and the manipulation of
others always have been subjects of special interest to the Jews. It
is not for nothing that they are as thick in these fields today as
they were in the time of Bernays and Freud. The reason I chose
Bernays' book to quote is that it provides a more concise and clear
summary, in a few quotable paragraphs, of the role of propaganda in
modern life than most other
books on the subject.
If I were you I wouldn't even waste time trying to hunt down a copy of
Bernays' book. All it does is state the obvious: namely, that the
whole concept of democracy is meaningless in an age where a few people
have in their hands the mechanism for controlling the attitudes and
opinions of a majority of the electorate. And Bernays also takes the
disingenuous position that not only is this control a fact of life,
but it is a good thing; it is necessary to control and regiment the
thinking of the public in order to avoid chaos, and it can only lead
us to greater progress and prosperity. He simply glosses over the
question of
who should exercise this control and what their motives should be.
If you really want to study the subject of propaganda, a good place to
start is with the 1962 book, also titled Propaganda, by the Frenchman
Jacques Ellul. That book is still in print and is available from the
sponsor of this program, National Vanguard Books. Professor Ellul
deals with the subject in much greater depth and with much greater
honesty than Bernays does, but he agrees with Bernays on the most
obvious and
fundamental conclusions: on the irrelevance of the idea of democracy,
for example. I quote from Professor Ellul's book:
"If I am in favor of democracy, I can only regret that propaganda
renders the true exercise of it almost impossible. But I think that it
would be even worse to entertain any illusions about a coexistence of
true democracy and propaganda." -- end of quote --
To me it is frustrating that a conclusion that seems so obvious is
nevertheless resisted by so many otherwise intelligent people.
Democracy has become almost a sacred concept to them, this idea that
the policies guiding our nation should be decided by counting the
votes of every featherless biped who has reached the age of 18. It's
like motherhood:
they're almost afraid to question it.
This seems to be as true of intellectuals in our society as it is of
Joe Sixpacks. The fact is that intellectuals are no more likely to be
independent-minded than people who work with their hands; most
intellectuals, just like most Joe Sixpacks, are lemmings. In fact, as
Ellul points out, it is precisely the intellectuals who are most
strongly controlled by propaganda, because they are more open to every
medium of propaganda.
And I must admit that it took me a long time to overcome the ideas
drummed into me when I was in school that under a democracy people are
more free than under any other political system, that under a
democracy we are all free to think and say whatever we want, and that
we have a greater responsibility as citizens of a democracy to make up
our own minds about things independently, and so on. Actually, we
still have some degree of individual freedom in the United States
today because more than 200 years ago men whose temperament was far
more aristocratic than democratic in the modern sense of the word were
willing to go to war against their legitimate government in order to
secure that freedom for us, and people with a truly democratic
temperament, who have been
gnawing away at that freedom ever since, haven't yet succeeded in
suppressing it completely.
Well, it should not be surprising to us that although books such as
Professor Ellul's Propaganda - and many others - are readily
available, almost no one has heard of them. Keeping the public
believing in the myth of democracy is an important element in
maintaining control over the thinking and behavior of the public. It
is simply immoral and
scandalous to question the reality of democracy. It's like questioning
the truth of the "Holocaust" story. And for that reason we're not
likely to be taught in our social studies classes in school or to read
in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal even the most obvious
and self-evident conclusions presented by Bernays or Ellul. We're
still
taught how democracy safeguards our freedom, even while those who
control the mechanism of propaganda in our democratic society are
working day and night to eliminate that freedom."
Michael Ejercito
> The promotion via their media holdings of homosexuality, mixed-race
> relationships and any other forms of aberrant and socially damaging
> behavior.
>
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Democracy is a cruel joke when the Jews control the media.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Here is a quote from The Riddle of the Jew's Success:
Nazis just wait for the welfare check so that they could buy meth
and kiddie porn.
Michael
Dave Heil
> Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
> countries, the USA and the USSR, and still it was a close fight. The
> good side almost won.
Topie, I can only hope that there is a special little corner of Hell
all set up for you. I trust that you'll spend eternity being deep-fried
in 30-weight.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> Democracy is a cruel joke when the Jews control the media.
I'm as free as a man can be, Topie. I was going to say that I'm sorry
that your life didn't turn out well. Then I remembered who and what you
are and I that sorrow evaporated.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
>
> "Can we doubt but that Poland was encouraged to ignore the German note
> of March which set forth eminently reasonable suggestions for a
> peaceful solution of the problem of the Corridor?
So the Germans wanted a corridor through Polish territory. It was
obvious that the Poles did not want such a corridor. Then the Germans
blame the warlike Poles for not wanting to give up their territory.
The Germans blamed the warlike French.
The Germans blamed the warlike Norwegians.
The Germans blamed the warlike Danes.
The Germans blamed the warlike Dutch.
And on and on and on...
Dave Heil
Topaz
Leon Degrelle
"We have the power. Now our gigantic work begins."
Those were Hitler's words on the night of January 30, 1933, as
cheering crowds surged past him, for five long hours, beneath the
windows of the Chancellery in Berlin.
His political struggle had lasted 14 years. He himself was 43, that
is, physically and intellectually at the peak of his powers. He had
won over millions of Germans and organized them into Germany's largest
and most dynamic political party, a party girded by a human rampart of
hundreds of thousands of storm troopers, three fourths of them members
of the working class. He had been extremely shrewd. All but toying
with his adversaries, Hitler had, one after another, vanquished them
all.
Standing there at the window, his arm raised to the delirious throng,
he must have known a feeling of triumph. But he seemed almost torpid,
absorbed, as if lost in another world.
It was a world far removed from the delirium in the street, a world of
65 million citizens who loved him or hated him, but all of whom, from
that night on, had become his responsibility. And as he knew-as almost
all Germans knew on January 1933 -- that this was a crushing, an
almost desperate responsibility.
Half a century later, few people understand the crisis Germany faced
at that time. Today, it's easy to assume that Germans have always been
well-fed and even plump. But the Germans Hitler inherited were virtual
skeletons.
During the preceding years, a score of "democratic" governments had
come and gone, often in utter confusion. Instead of alleviating the
people's misery, they had increased it, due to their own instability:
it was impossible for them to pursue any given plan for more than a
year or two. Germany had arrived at a dead end. In just a few years
there had been 224,000 suicides - a horrifying figure, bespeaking a
state of misery even more horrifying.
By the beginning of 1933, the misery of the German people was
virtually universal. At least six million unemployed and hungry
workers roamed aimlessly through the streets, receiving a pitiful
unemployment benefit of less than 42 marks per month. Many of those
out of work had families to feed, so that altogether some 20 million
Germans, a third of the country's population, were reduced to trying
to survive on about 40 pfennigs per person per day.
Unemployment benefits, moreover, were limited to a period of six
months. After that came only the meager misery allowance dispensed by
the welfare offices.
Notwithstanding the gross inadequacy of this assistance, by trying to
save the six million unemployed from total destruction, even for just
six months, both the state and local branches of the German government
saw themselves brought to ruin: in 1932 alone such aid had swallowed
up four billion marks, 57 percent of the total tax revenues of the
federal government and the regional states. A good many German
municipalities were bankrupt.
Those still lucky enough to have some kind of job were not much better
off. Workers and employees had taken a cut of 25 percent in their
wages and salaries. Twenty-one percent of them were earning between
100 and 250 marks per month; 69.2 percent of them, in January of 1933,
were being paid less than 1,200 marks annually. No more than about
100,000 Germans, it was estimated, were able to live without financial
worries.
During the three years before Hitler came to power, total earnings had
fallen by more than half, from 23 billion marks to 11 billion. The
average per capita income had dropped from 1,187 marks in 1929 to 627
marks, a scarcely tolerable level, in 1932. By January 1933, when
Hitler took office, 90 percent of the German people were destitute.
No one escaped the strangling effects of the unemployment. The
intellectuals were hit as hard as the working class. Of the 135,000
university graduates, 60 percent were without jobs. Only a tiny
minority was receiving unemployment benefits.
"The others," wrote one foreign observer, Marcel Laloire (in his book
New Germany), "are dependent on their parents or are sleeping in
flophouses. In the daytime they can be seen on the boulevards of
Berlin wearing signs on their backs to the effect that they will
accept any kind of work."
But there was no longer any kind of work.
The same drastic fall-off had hit Germany's cottage industry, which
comprised some four million workers. Its turnover had declined 55
percent, with total sales plunging from 22 billion to 10 billion
marks.
Hardest hit of all were construction workers; 90 percent of them were
unemployed.
Farmers, too, had been ruined, crushed by losses amounting to 12
billion marks. Many had been forced to mortgage their homes and their
land. In 1932 just the interest on the loans they had incurred due to
the crash was equivalent to 20 percent of the value of the
agricultural production of the entire country. Those who were no
longer able to meet the interest payments saw their farms auctioned
off in legal proceedings: in the years 1931-1932, 17,157 farms-with a
combined total area of 462,485 hectares - were liquidated in this way.
The "democracy" of Germany's "Weimar Republic" (1918 -1933) had proven
utterly ineffective in addressing such flagrant wrongs as this
impoverishment of millions of farm workers, even though they were the
nation's most stable and hardest working citizens. Plundered,
dispossessed, abandoned: small wonder they heeded Hitler's call.
Their situation on January 30, 1933, was tragic. Like the rest of
Germany's working class, they had been betrayed by their political
leaders, reduced to the alternatives of miserable wages, paltry and
uncertain benefit payments, or the outright humiliation of begging.
Germany's industries, once renowned everywhere in the world, were no
longer prosperous, despite the millions of marks in gratuities that
the financial magnates felt obliged to pour into the coffers of the
parties in power before each election in order to secure their
cooperation. For 14 years the well-blinkered conservatives and
Christian democrats of the political center had been feeding at the
trough just as greedily as their adversaries of the left..
One inevitable consequence of this ever-increasing misery and
uncertainty about the future was an abrupt decline in the birthrate.
When your household savings are wiped out, and when you fear even
greater calamities in the days ahead, you do not risk adding to the
number of your dependents.
In those days the birth rate was a reliable barometer of a country's
prosperity. A child is a joy, unless you have nothing but a crust of
bread to put in its little hand. And that's just the way it was with
hundreds of thousands of German families in 1932..
Hitler knew that he would be starting from zero. From less than zero.
But he was also confident of his strength of will to create Germany
anew-politically, socially, financially, and economically. Now legally
and officially in power, he was sure that he could quickly convert
that cipher into a Germany more powerful than ever before.
What support did he have?
For one thing, he could count on the absolute support of millions of
fanatical disciples. And on that January evening, they joyfully shared
in the great thrill of victory. Some thirteen million Germans, many of
them former Socialists and Communists, had voted for his party.
But millions of Germans were still his adversaries, disconcerted
adversaries, to be sure, whom their own political parties had
betrayed, but who had still not been won over to National Socialism.
The two sides-those for and those against Hitler-were very nearly
equal in numbers. But whereas those on the left were divided among
themselves, Hitler's disciples were strongly united. And in one thing
above all, the National Socialists had an incomparable advantage: in
their convictions and in their total faith in a leader. Their highly
organized and well-disciplined party had contented with the worst kind
of obstacles, and had overcome them..
In the eyes of the capitalists, money was the sole active element in
the flourishing of a country's economy. To Hitler's way of thinking,
that conception was radically wrong: capital, on the contrary, was
only an instrument. Work was the essential element: man's endeavor,
man's honor, blood, muscles and soul.
Hitler wanted not just to put an to the class struggle, but to
reestablish the priority of the human being, in justice and respect,
as the principal factor in production..
For the worker's trust in the fatherland to be restored, he had to
feel that from now on he was to be (and to be treated) as an equal,
instead of remaining a social inferior. Under the governments of the
so-called democratic parties of both the left and the right, he had
remained an inferior; for none of them had understood that in the
hierarchy of national values, work is the very essence of life; ..
The objective, then, was far greater than merely getting six million
unemployed back to work. It was to achieve a total revolution.
"The people," Hitler declared, "were not put here on earth for the
sake of the economy, and the economy doesn't exist for the sake of
capital. On the contrary, capital is meant to serve the economy, and
the economy in turn to serve the people."
It would not be enough merely to reopen the thousands of closed
factories and fill them with workers. If the old concepts still ruled,
the workers would once again be nothing more than living machines,
faceless and interchangeable..
Nowhere in twentieth-century Europe had the authority of a head of
state ever been based on such overwhelming and freely given national
consent. Prior to Hitler, from 1919 to 1932, those governments piously
styling themselves democratic had usually come to power by meager
majorities, sometimes as low as 51 or 52 percent.
"I am not a dictator," Hitler had often affirmed, "and I never will
be. Democracy will be rigorously enforced by National Socialism."
Authority does not mean tyranny. A tyrant is someone who puts himself
in power without the will of the people or against the will of the
people. A democrat is placed in power by the people. But democracy is
not limited to a single formula. It may be partisan or parliamentary.
Or it may be authoritarian. The important thing is that the people
have wished it, chosen it, established it in its given form.
That was the case with Hitler. He came to power in an essentially
democratic way. Whether one likes it or not, this fact is undeniable.
And after coming to power, his popular support measurably increased
from year to year. The more intelligent and honest of his enemies have
been obliged to admit this, men such as the declared anti-Nazi
historian and professor Joachim Fest, who wrote:
For Hitler was never interested in establishing a mere tyranny. Sheer
greed for power will not suffice as explanation for his personality
and energy-He was not born to be a mere tyrant. He was fixated upon
his mission of defending Europe and the Aryan race ... Never had he
felt so dependent upon the masses as he did at this time, and he
watched their reactions with anxious concern.
These lines weren't written by Dr. Goebbels, but by a stern critic of
Hitler and his career..
When it came time to vote, Hitler was granted plenary powers with a
sweeping majority of 441 votes to 94: he had won not just two thirds,
but 82.44 percent of the assembly's votes. This "Enabling Act" granted
Hitler for four years virtually absolute authority over the
legislative as well as the executive affairs of the government..
After 1945 the explanation that was routinely offered for all this was
that the Germans had lost their heads. Whatever the case, it is a
historical fact that they acted of their own free will. Far from being
resigned, they were enthusiastic. "For the first time since the last
days of the monarchy," historian Joachim Fest has conceded, "the
majority of the Germans now had the feeling that they could identify
with the state."..
"You talk about persecution!" he thundered in an impromptu response to
an address by the Social Democratic speaker. "I think that there are
only a few of us [in our party] here who did not have to suffer
persecutions in prison from your side ... You seem to have totally
forgotten that for years our shirts were ripped off our backs because
you did not like the color . . . We have outgrown your persecutions!"
"In those days," he scathingly continued, "our newspapers were banned
and banned and again banned, our meetings were forbidden, and we were
forbidden to speak, I was forbidden to speak, for years on. And now
you say that criticism is salutary!"..
Hitler's millions of followers had rediscovered the primal strength of
rough, uncitified man, of a time when men still had backbone..
Gustav Noske, the lumberjack who became defense minister - and the
most valiant defender of the embattled republic in the tumultuous
months immediately following the collapse of 1918 - acknowledged
honestly in 1944, when the Third Reich was already rapidly breaking
down, that the great majority of the German people still remained true
to Hitler because of the social renewal he had brought to the working
class..
Here again, well before the collapse of party-ridden Weimar Republic,
disillusion with the unions had become widespread among the working
masses. They were starving. The hundreds of Socialist and Communist
deputies stood idly by, impotent to provide any meaningful help to the
desperate proletariat.
Their leaders had no proposals to remedy, even partially, the great
distress of the people; no plans for large-scale public works, no
industrial restructuring, no search for markets abroad.
Moreover, they offered no energetic resistance to the pillaging by
foreign countries of the Reich's last financial resources: this a
consequence of the Treaty of Versailles that the German Socialists had
voted to ratify in June of 1919, and which they had never since had
the courage effectively to oppose..
In 1930, 1931 and 1932, German workers had watched the disaster grow:
the number of unemployed rose from two million to three, to four, to
five, then to six million. At the same time, unemployment benefits
fell lower and lower, finally to disappear completely. Everywhere one
saw dejection and privation: emaciated mothers, children wasting away
in sordid lodgings, and thousands of beggars in long sad lines.
The failure, or incapacity, of the leftist leaders to act, not to
mention their insensitivity, had stupefied the working class. Of what
use were such leaders with their empty heads and empty hearts-and,
often enough, full pockets?
Well before January 30, thousands of workers had already joined up
with Hitler's dynamic formations, which were always hard at it where
they were most needed. Many joined the National Socialists when they
went on strike. Hitler, himself a former worker and a plain man like
themselves, was determined to eliminate unemployment root and branch.
He wanted not merely to defend the laborer's right to work, but to
make his calling one of honor, to insure him respect and to integrate
him fully into a living community of all the Germans, who had been
divided class against class.
In January 1933, Hitler's victorious troops were already largely
proletarian in character, including numerous hardfisted street
brawlers, many unemployed, who no longer counted economically or
socially.
Meanwhile, membership in the Marxist labor unions had fallen off
enormously: among thirteen million socialist and Communist voters in
1932, no more than five million were union members. Indifference and
discouragement had reached such levels that many members no longer
paid their union dues. Many increasingly dispirited Marxist leaders
began to wonder if perhaps the millions of deserters were the ones who
saw things clearly. Soon they wouldn't wonder any longer.
Even before Hitler won Reichstag backing for his "Enabling Act,"
Germany's giant labor union federation, the ADGB, had begun to rally
to the National Socialist cause. As historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "On March 20, the labor federation's executive committee
addressed a kind of declaration of loyalty to Hitler." (J. Fest,
Hitler, p. 413.)
Hitler than took a bold and clever step. The unions had always
clamored to have the First of May recognized as a worker's holiday,
but the Weimar Republic had never acceded to their request. Hitler,
never missing an opportunity, grasped this one with both hands. He did
more than grant this reasonable demand: he proclaimed the First of May
a national holiday..
I myself attended the memorable meeting at the Tempelhof field in
1933. By nine o'clock that morning, giant columns, some of workers,
others of youth groups, marching in cadence down the pavement of
Berlin's great avenues, had started off towards the airfield to which
Hitler had called together all Germans. All Germany would follow the
rally as it was transmitted nationwide by radio..
In the dark, a group of determined opponents could easily have heckled
Hitler or otherwise sabotaged the meeting. Perhaps a third of the
onlookers had been Socialists or Communists only three months
previously. But not a single hostile voice was raised during the
entire ceremony. There was only universal acclamation.
Ceremony is the right word for it. It was an almost magical rite.
Hitler and Goebbels had no equals in the arranging of dedicatory
ceremonies of this sort. First there were popular songs, then great
Wagnerian hymns to grip the audience. Germany has a passion for
orchestral music, and Wagner taps the deepest and most secret vein of
the German soul, its romanticism, its inborn sense of the powerful and
the grand.
Meanwhile the hundreds of flags floated above the rostrum, redeemed
from the darkness by arrows of light.
Now Hitler strode to the rostrum. For those standing at the of the
field, his face must have appeared vanishingly small, but his words
flooded instantaneously across the acres of people in his audience.
A Latin audience would have preferred a voice less harsh, more
delicately expressive. But there was no doubt that Hitler spoke to the
psyche of the German people.
Germans have rarely had the good fortune to experience the enchantment
of the spoken word. In Germany, the tone has always been set by
ponderous speakers, more fond of elephantine pedantry than oratorical
passion. Hitler, as a speaker, was a prodigy, the greatest orator of
his century. He possessed, above all, what the ordinary speaker lacks:
a mysterious ability to project power.
A bit like a medium or sorcerer, he was seized, even transfixed, as he
addressed a crowd. It responded to Hitler's projection of power,
radiating it back, establishing, in the course of myriad exchanges, a
current that both orator and audience gave to and drew from equally.
One had to personally experience him speaking to understand this
phenomenon.
This special gift is what lay at the basis of Hitler's ability to win
over the masses. His high-voltage, lightning-like projection
transported and transformed all who experienced it. Tens of millions
were enlightened, riveted and inflamed by the fire of his anger,
irony, and passion.
By the time the cheering died away that May first evening, hundreds of
thousands of previously indifferent or even hostile workers who had
come to Tempelhof at the urging of their labor federation leaders were
now won over. They had become followers, like the SA stormtroopers
whom so many there that evening had brawled with in recent years.
The great human sea surged back from Tempelhof to Berlin. A million
and a half people had arrived in perfect order, and their departure
was just as orderly. No bottlenecks halted the cars and busses. For
those of us who witnessed it, this rigorous, yet joyful, discipline of
a contented people was in itself a source of wonder. Everything about
the May Day mass meeting had come off as smoothly clockwork.
The memory of that fabulous crowd thronging back to the center of
Berlin will never leave me. A great many were on foot. Their faces
were now different faces, as though they had been imbued with a
strange and totally new spirit. The non-Germans in the crowd were as
if stunned, and no less impressed than Hitler's fellow countrymen.
The French ambassador, Andr� Fran�ois-Poncet, noted:
The foreigners on the speaker's platform as guests of honor were not
alone in carrying away the impression of a truly beautiful and
wonderful public festival, an impression that was created by the
regime's genius for organization, by the night time display of
uniforms, by the play of lights, the rhythm of the music, by the flags
and the colorful fireworks; and they were not alone in thinking that a
breath of reconciliation and unity was passing over the Third Reich.
"It is our wish," Hitler had exclaimed, as though taking heaven as his
witness, "to get along together and to struggle together as brothers,
so that at the hour when we shall come before God, we might say to
him: 'See, Lord, we have changed. The German people are no longer a
people ashamed, a people mean and cowardly and divided. No, Lord! The
German people have become strong in their spirit, in their will, in
their perseverance, in their acceptance of any sacrifice. Lord, we
remain faithful to Thee! Bless our struggle!" (A. Fran�ois-Poncet,
Souvenirs d'une ambassade � Berlin, p. 128.)
Who else could have made such an incantatory appeal without making
himself look ridiculous?
No politician had ever spoken of the rights of workers with such faith
and such force, or had laid out in such clear terms the social plan he
pledged to carry out on behalf of the common people.
The next day, the newspaper of the proletarian left, the "Union
Journal," reported on this mass meeting at which at least two thirds-a
million-of those attending were workers. "This May First was victory
day," the paper summed up.
With the workers thus won over, what further need was there for the
thousands of labor union locals that for so long had poisoned the
social life of the Reich and which, in any case, had accomplished
nothing of a lasting, positive nature?
Within hours of the conclusion of that "victory" meeting at the
Tempelhof field, the National Socialists were able to peacefully take
complete control of Germany's entire labor union organization,
including all its buildings, enterprises and banks. An era of Marxist
obstruction abruptly came to an end : from now on, a single national
organization would embody the collective will and interests of all of
Germany's workers.
Although he was now well on his way to creating what he pledged would
be a true "government of the people," Hitler also realized that great
obstacles remained. For one thing, the Communist rulers in Moscow had
not dropped their guard-or their guns. Restoring the nation would take
more than words and promises, it would take solid achievements. Only
then would the enthusiasm shown by the working class at the May First
mass meeting be an expression of lasting victory.
How could Hitler solve the great problem that had defied solution by
everyone else (both in Germany and abroad): putting millions of
unemployed back to work?
What would Hitler do about wages? Working hours? Leisure time?
Housing? How would he succeed in winning, at long last, respect for
the rights and dignity of the worker?
How could men's lives be improved-materially, morally, and, one might
even say, spiritually? How would he proceed to build a new society fit
for human beings, free of the inertia, injustices and prejudices of
the past?
"National Socialism," Hitler had declared at the outset, "has its
mission and its hour; it is not just a passing movement but a phase of
history."
The instruments of real power now in his hands-an authoritarian state,
its provinces subordinate but nonetheless organic parts of the
national whole-Hitler had acted quickly to shake himself free of the
last constraints of the impotent sectarian political parties.
Moreover, he was now able to direct a cohesive labor force that was no
longer split into a thousand rivulets but flowed as a single, mighty
current.
Hitler was self-confident, sure of the power of his own conviction. He
had no intention, or need, to resort to the use of physical force.
Instead, he intended to win over, one by one, the millions of Germans
who were still his adversaries, and even those who still hated him.
His conquest of Germany had taken years of careful planning and hard
work. Similarly, he would now realize his carefully worked out plans
for transforming the state and society. This meant not merely changes
in administrative or governmental structures, but far-reaching social
programs.
He had once vowed: "The hour will come when the 15 million people who
now hate us will be solidly behind us and will acclaim with us the new
revival we shall create together." Eventually he would succeed in
winning over even many of his most refractory skeptics and
adversaries.
His army of converts was already forming ranks. In a remarkable
tribute, historian Joachim Fest felt obliged to acknowledge
unequivocally:
Hitler had moved rapidly from the status of a demagogue to that of a
respected statesman. The craving to join the ranks of the victors was
spreading like an epidemic, and the shrunken minority of those who
resisted the urge were being visibly pushed into isolation-The past
was dead. The future, it seemed, belonged to the regime, which had
more and more followers, which was being hailed everywhere and
suddenly had sound reasons on its side.
And even the prominent leftist writer Kurt Tucholsky, sensing the
direction of the inexorable tide that was sweeping Germany, vividly
commented: "You don't go railing against the ocean." (J. Fest, Hitler,
pp. 415 f.)
"Our power," Hitler was now able to declare, "no longer belongs to any
territorial fraction of the Reich, nor to any single class of the
nation, but to the people in its totality."
Much still remained to be done, however. So far, Hitler had succeeded
in clearing the way of obstacles to his program. Now the time to build
had arrived.
So many others had failed to tackle the many daunting problems that
were now his responsibility. Above all, the nation demanded a solution
to the great problem of unemployment. Could Hitler now succeed where
others had so dismally failed?..
Unemployment could be combated and eliminated only by giving industry
the financial means to start up anew, to modernize, thus creating
millions of new jobs.
The normal rate of consumption would not be restored, let alone
increased, unless one first raised the starvation-level allowances
that were making purchases of any kind a virtual impossibility. On the
contrary, production and sales would have to be restored before the
six million unemployed could once again become purchasers.
The great economic depression could be overcome only by restimulating
industry, by bringing industry into step with the times, and by
promoting the development of new products..
Nearly ten years earlier, while in his prison cell, Hitler had already
envisioned a formidable system of national highways. He had also
conceived of a small, easily affordable automobile (later known as the
"Volkswagen"), and had even suggested its outline. It should have the
shape of a June bug, he proposed. Nature itself suggested the car's
aerodynamic line.
Until Hitler came to power, a car was the privilege of the rich. It
was not financially within the reach of the middle class, much less of
the worker. The "Volkswagen," costing one-tenth as much as the
standard automobile of earlier years, would eventually become a
popular work vehicle and a source of pleasure after work: a way to
unwind and get some fresh air, and of discovering, thanks to the new
Autobahn highway network, a magnificent country that then, in its
totality, was virtually unknown to the German worker.
From the beginning, Hitler wanted this economical new car to be built
for the millions. The production works would also become one of
Germany's most important industrial centers and employers.
During his imprisonment, Hitler had also drawn up plans for the
construction of popular housing developments and majestic public
buildings.
Some of Hitler's rough sketches still survive. They include groups of
individual worker's houses with their own gardens (which were to be
built in the hundreds of thousands), a plan for a covered stadium in
Berlin, and a vast congress hall, unlike any other in the world, that
would symbolize the grandeur of the National Socialist revolution.
"A building with a monumental dome," historian Werner Maser has
explained, "the plan of which he drew while he was writing Mein Kampf,
would have a span of 46 meters, a height of 220 meters, a diameter of
250 meters, and a capacity of 150 to 190 thousand people standing. The
interior of the building would have been 17 times larger than Saint
Peter's Cathedral in Rome." (W. Maser, Hitler, Adolf, p. 100.)
"That hall," architect Albert Speer has pointed out, "was not just an
idle dream impossible of achievement."
Hitler's imagination, therefore, had long been teeming with a number
of ambitious projects, many of which would eventually be realized.
Fortunately, the needed entrepreneurs, managers and technicians were
on hand. Hitler would not have to improvise.
Historian Werner Maser, although quite anti-Hitler-like nearly all of
his colleagues (how else would they have found publishers?) - has
acknowledged: "From the beginning of his political career, he [Hitler]
took great pains systematically to arrange for whatever he was going
to need in order to carry out his plans."
"Hitler was distinguished," Maser has also noted, "by an exceptional
intelligence in technical matters." Hitler had acquired his knowledge
by devoting many thousands of hours to technical studies from the time
of his youth.
"Hitler read an endless number of books," explained Dr. Schacht. "He
acquired a very considerable amount of knowledge and made masterful
use of it in discussions and speeches. In certain respects he was a
man endowed with genius. He had ideas that no one else would ever have
thought of, ideas that resulted in the ending of great difficulties,
sometimes by measures of an astonishing simplicity or brutality."
Many billions of marks would be needed to begin the great
socioeconomic revolution that was destined, as Hitler had always
intended, to make Germany once again the European leader in industry
and commerce and, most urgently, to rapidly wipe out unemployment in
Germany. Where would the money be found? And, once obtained, how would
these funds be allotted to ensure maximum effectiveness in their
investment?
Hitler was by no means a dictator in matters of the economy. He was,
rather, a stimulator. His government would undertake to do only that
which private initiative could not.
Hitler believed in the importance of individual creative imagination
and dynamism, in the need for every person of superior ability and
skill to assume responsibility.
He also recognized the importance of the profit motive. Deprived of
the prospect of having his efforts rewarded, the person of ability
often refrains from running risks. The economic failure of Communism
has demonstrated this. In the absence of personal incentives and the
opportunity for real individual initiative, the Soviet "command
economy" lagged in all but a few fields, its industry years behind its
competitors.
State monopoly tolls the death of all initiative, and hence of all
progress.
For all men selflessly to pool their wealth might be marvelous, but it
is also contrary to human nature. Nearly every man desires that his
labor shall improve his own condition and that of his family, and
feels that his brain, creative imagination, and persistence well
deserve their reward.
Because it disregarded these basic psychological truths, Soviet
Communism, right to the end, wallowed in economic mediocrity, in spite
of its immense reservoir of manpower, its technical expertise, and its
abundant natural resources, all of which ought to have made it an
industrial and technological giant.
Hitler was always adverse to the idea of state management of the
economy. He believed in elites. "A single idea of genius," he used to
say, "has more value than a lifetime of conscientious labor in an
office."
Just as there are political or intellectual elites, so also is there
an industrial elite. A manufacturer of great ability should not be
restrained, hunted down by the internal revenue services like a
criminal, or be unappreciated by the public. On the contrary, it is
important for economic development that the industrialist be
encouraged morally and materially, as much as possible.
The most fruitful initiatives Hitler would take from 1933 on would be
on behalf of private enterprise. He would keep an eye on the quality
of their directors, to be sure, and would shunt aside incompetents,
quite a few of them at times, but he also supported the best ones,
those with the keenest minds, the most imaginative and bold, even if
their political opinions did not always agree with his own.
"There is no question," he stated very firmly, "of dismissing a
factory owner or director under the pretext that he is not a National
Socialist."
Hitler would exercise the same moderation, the same pragmatism, in the
administrative as well as in the industrial sphere.
What he demanded of his co-workers, above all, was competence and
effectiveness. The great majority of Third Reich functionaries - some
80 percent-were never enrolled in the National Socialist party.
Several of Hitler's ministers, like Konstantin von Neurath and
Schwerin von Krosigk, and ambassadors to such key posts as Prague,
Vienna and Ankara, were not members of the party. But they were
capable..
"Herr Schacht," he said, "we are assuredly in agreement on one point:
no other single task facing the government at the moment can be so
truly urgent as conquering unemployment. That will take a lot of
money. Do you see any possibility of finding it apart from the
Reichsbank?" And after a moment, he added: "How much would it take? Do
you have any idea?"
Wishing to win Schacht over by appealing to his ambition, Hitler
smiled and then asked: "Would you be willing to once again assume
presidency of the Reichsbank?" Schacht let on that he had a
sentimental concern for Dr. Luther, and did not want to hurt the
incumbent's feelings. Playing along, Hitler reassured Schacht that he
would find an appropriate new job elsewhere for Luther.
Schacht then pricked up his ears, drew himself up, and focused his big
round eyes on Hitler: "Well, if that's the way it is," he said, "then
I am ready to assume the presidency of the Reichsbank again."
His great dream was being realized. Schacht had been president of the
Reichsbank between 1923 and 1930, but had been dismissed. Now he would
return in triumph. He felt vindicated. Within weeks, the ingenious
solution to Germany's pressing financial woes would burst forth from
his inventive brain.
"It was necessary," Schacht later explained, "to discover a method
that would avoid inflating the investment holdings of the Reichsbank
immoderately and consequently increasing the circulation of money
excessively."
"Therefore," he went on, "I had to find some means of getting the sums
that were lying idle in pockets and banks, without meaning for it to
be long term and without having it undergo the risk of depreciation.
That was the reasoning behind the Mefo bonds."
What were these "Mefo" bonds? Mefo was a contraction of the
Metallurgische Forschungs-GmbH (Metallurgic Research Company). With a
startup capitalization of one billion marks - which Hitler and Schacht
arranged to be provided by the four giant firms of Krupp, Siemens,
Deutsche Werke and Rheinmetall-this company would eventually promote
many billions of marks worth of investment.
Enterprises, old and new, that filled government orders had only to
draw drafts on Mefo for the amounts due. These drafts, when presented
to the Reichsbank, were immediately convertible into cash. The success
of the Mefo program depended entirely on public acceptance of the Mefo
bonds. But the wily Schacht had planned well. Since Mefo bonds were
short-term bonds that could be cashed in at any time, there was no
real risk in buying, accepting or holding them. They bore an interest
of four percent-a quite acceptable figure in those days-whereas
banknotes hidden under the mattress earned nothing. The public quickly
took all this into consideration and eagerly accepted the bonds.
While the Reichsbank was able to offer from its own treasury a
relatively insignificant 150 million marks for Hitler's war on
unemployment, in just four years the German public subscribed more
than 12 billion marks worth of Mefo bonds!
These billions, the fruit of the combined imagination, ingenuity and
astuteness of Hitler and Schacht, swept away the temporizing and
fearful conservatism of the bankers. Over the next four years, this
enormous credit reserve would make miracles possible.
Soon after the initial billion-mark credit, Schacht added another
credit of 600 million in order to finance the start of Hitler's grand
program for highway construction. This Autobahn program provided
immediate work for 100,000 of the unemployed, and eventually assured
wages for some 500,000 workers.
As large as this outlay was, it was immediately offset by a
corresponding cutback in government unemployment benefits, and by the
additional tax revenue generated as a result of the increase in living
standard (sping) of the newly employed.
Within a few months, thanks to the credit created by the Mefo bonds,
private industry once again dared to assume risks and expand. Germans
returned to work by the hundreds of thousands.
Was Schacht solely responsible for this extraordinary turnaround?
After the war, he answered for himself as a Nuremberg Tribunal
defendant, where he was charged with having made possible the Reich's
economic revival:
I don't think Hitler was reduced to begging for my help. If I had not
served him, he would have found other methods, other means. He was not
a man to give up. It's easy enough for you to say, Mr. Prosecutor,
that I should have watched Hitler die and not lifted a finger. But the
entire working class would have died with him!
Even Marxists recognized Hitler's success, and their own failure. In
the June 1934 issue of the Zeitschrift f�r Sozialismus, the journal of
the German Social Democrats in exile, this acknowledgement appears:
Faced with the despair of proletarians reduced to joblessness, of
young people with diplomas and no future, of the middle classes of
merchants and artisans condemned to bankruptcy, and of farmers
terribly threatened by the collapse in agricultural prices, we all
failed. We weren't capable of offering the masses anything but
speeches about the glory of socialism.
VI. The Social Revolution
Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six
million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although
it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic"
historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a
single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly
significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.
Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically
changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were
transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers,
with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields.
Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working
class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was
introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A
wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young
workers was established, with the world's best system of technical
training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health
insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.
This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up
today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of
the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps
Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century..
Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who
had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life;
conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense
and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a
new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights
of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding
each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this
organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan,
which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.
Without this plan, the nation would have collapsed into anarchy.
All-encompassing, this program included broad industrial recovery as
well as detailed attention to even construction of comfortable inns
along the new highway network.
It took several years for a stable social structure to emerge from the
French Revolution. The Soviets needed even more time: five years after
the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, hundreds of thousands of Russians
were still dying of hunger and disease. In Germany, by contrast, the
great machinery was in motion within months, with organization and
accomplishment quickly meshing together..
Hitler personally dug the first spadeful of earth for the first
Autobahn highway, linking Frankfurt-am-Main with Darmstadt. For the
occasion, he brought along Dr. Schacht, the man whose visionary credit
wizardry had made the project possible. The official procession moved
ahead, three cars abreast in front, then six across, spanning the
entire width of the autobahn..
Hitler's plan to build thousands of low-cost homes also demanded a
vast mobilization of manpower. He had envisioned housing that would be
attractive, cozy, and affordable for millions of ordinary German
working-class families. He had no intention of continuing to tolerate,
as his predecessors had, cramped, ugly "rabbit warren" housing for the
German people. The great barracks-like housing projects on the
outskirts of factory towns, packed with cramped families, disgusted
him.
The greater part of the houses he would build were single story,
detached dwellings, with small yards where children could romp, wives
could grow vegetable and flower gardens, while the bread-winners could
read their newspapers in peace after the day's work. These
single-family homes were built to conform to the architectural styles
of the various German regions, retaining as much as possible the
charming local variants.
Wherever there was no practical alternative to building large
apartment complexes, Hitler saw to it that the individual apartments
were spacious, airy and enhanced by surrounding lawns and gardens
where the children could play safely.
The new housing was, of course, built in conformity with the highest
standards of public health, a consideration notoriously neglected in
previous working-class projects.
Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly
married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of
each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the
normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to
cancel the entire loan debt.
Once, during a conversation with Hitler, I expressed my astonishment
at this policy. "But then, you never get back the total amount of your
loans?," I asked. "How so?" he replied, smiling. "Over a period of ten
years, a family with four children brings in much more than our loans,
through the taxes levied on a hundred different items of consumption."
As it happened, tax revenues increased every year, in proportion to
the rise in expenditures for Hitler's social programs. In just a few
years, revenue from taxes tripled. Hitler's Germany never experienced
a financial crisis.
To stimulate the moribund economy demanded the nerve, which Hitler
had, to invest money that the government didn't yet have, rather than
passively waiting-in accordance with "sound" financial principles-for
the economy to revive by itself.
Today, our whole era is dying economically because we have succumbed
to fearful hesitation. Enrichment follows investment, not the other
way around..
Even before the year 1933 had ended, Hitler had succeeded in building
202,119 housing units. Within four years he would provide the German
people with nearly a million and a half (1,458,128) new dwellings!
Moreover, workers would no longer be exploited as they had been. A
month's rent for a worker could not exceed 26 marks, or about an
eighth of the average wage then. Employees with more substantial
salaries paid monthly rents of up to 45 marks maximum.
Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who
had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were
built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square
meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such
farmhouses..
Everywhere industry was hiring again, with some firms-like Krupp, IG
Farben and the large automobile manufacturers-taking on new workers on
a very large scale. As the country became more prosperous, car sales
increased by more than 80,000 units in 1933 alone. Employment in the
auto industry doubled. Germany was gearing up for full production,
with private industry leading the way.
The new government lavished every assistance on the private sector,
the chief factor in employment as well as production. Hitler almost
immediately made available 500 million marks in credits to private
business.
This start-up assistance given to German industry would repay itself
many times over. Soon enough, another two billion marks would be
loaned to the most enterprising companies. Nearly half would go into
new wages and salaries, saving the treasury an estimated three hundred
million marks in unemployment benefits. Added to the hundreds of
millions in tax receipts spurred by the business recovery, the state
quickly recovered its investment, and more.
Hitler's entire economic policy would be based on the following
equation: risk large sums to undertake great public works and to spur
the renewal and modernization of industry, then later recover the
billions invested through invisible and painless tax revenues. It
didn't take long for Germany to see the results of Hitler's recovery
formula.
Economic recovery, as important as it was, nevertheless wasn't
Hitler's only objective. As he strived to restore full employment,
Hitler never lost sight of his goal of creating a organization
powerful enough to stand up to capitalist owners and managers, who had
shown little concern for the health and welfare of the entire national
community.
Hitler would impose on everyone-powerful boss and lowly wage earner
alike-his own concept of the organic social community. Only the loyal
collaboration of everyone could assure the prosperity of all classes
and social groups.
Consistent with their doctrine, Germany's Marxist leaders had set
class against class, helping to bring the country to the brink of
economic collapse. Deserting their Marxist unions and political
parties in droves, most workers had come to realize that strikes and
grievances their leaders incited only crippled production, and thus
the workers as well.
By the of 1932, in any case, the discredited labor unions were
drowning in massive debt that realistically could never be repaid.
Some of the less scrupulous union officials, sensing the oncoming
catastrophe, had begun stealing hundreds of thousands of marks from
the workers they represented. The Marxist leaders had failed:
socially, financially and morally.
Every joint human activity requires a leader. The head of a factory or
business is also the person naturally responsible for it. He oversees
every aspect of production and work. In Hitler's Germany, the head of
a business had to be both a capable director and a person concerned
for the social justice and welfare of his employees. Under Hitler,
many owners and managers who had proven to be unjust, incompetent or
recalcitrant lost their jobs, or their businesses.
A considerable number of legal guarantees protected the worker against
any abuse of authority at the workplace. Their purpose was to insure
that the rights of workers were respected, and that workers were
treated as worthy collaborators, not just as animated tools. Each
industrialist was legally obliged to collaborate with worker delegates
in drafting shop regulations that were not imposed from above but
instead adapted to each business enterprise and its particular working
conditions. These regulations had to specify "the length of the
working day, the time and method of paying wages, and the safety
rules, and to be posted throughout the factory," within easy access of
both the worker whose interests might be angered and the owner or
manager whose orders might be subverted.
The thousands of different, individual versions of such regulations
served to create a healthy rivalry, with every factory group vying to
outdo the others in efficiency and justice.
One of the first reforms to benefit German workers was the
establishment of paid vacations. In France, the leftist Popular Front
government would noisily claim, in 1936, to have originated legally
mandated paid vacations-and stingy ones at that, only one week per
year. But it was actually Hitler who first established them, in 1933
-- and they were two or three times more generous.
Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid
vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or
five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time
at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest
workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made
sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop
his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of
paid vacation per year.
Today, more than half a century later, these figures have been
surpassed, but in 1933 they far exceeded European norms.
The standard vacation was twelve days. Then, from the age of 25 on, it
went up to 18 days. After ten years with the company, workers got a
still longer vacation: 21 days, or three times what the French
socialists would grant the workers of their country in 1936.
Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for
overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the
continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the
eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily
available.
In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each
day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make
use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to
provide.
Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually
non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole
discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were
spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four
weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months
to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the
"Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).
This Court was one of three great institutions that were established
to protect German workers. The others were the "Labor Commissions" and
the "Council of Trust."
The "Council of Trust" (Vertrauensrat) was responsible for
establishing and developing a real spirit of community between
management and labor. "In every business enterprise," the 1934 "Labor
Charter" law stipulated, "the employer and head of the enterprise
(F�hrer), the employees and workers, personnel of the enterprise,
shall work jointly toward the goal of the enterprise and the common
good of the nation."
No longer would either be exploited by the other-neither the worker by
arbitrary whim of the employer, nor the employer through the blackmail
of strikes for political ends.
Article 35 of the "Labor Charter" law stated: "Every member of an
enterprise community shall assume the responsibility required by his
position in said common enterprise." In short, each enterprise would
be headed by a dynamic executive, charged with a sense of the greater
community-no longer a selfish capitalist with unconditional, arbitrary
power.
"The interest of the community may require that an incapable or
unworthy employer be relieved of his duties," the "Labor Charter"
stipulated. The employer was no longer unassailable, an all-powerful
boss with the last word on hiring and firing his staff. He, too, would
be subject to the workplace regulations, which he was now obliged to
respect no less than the least of his employees. The law conferred the
honor and responsibility of authority on the employer only insofar as
he merited it..
In the Third Reich, the worker knew that "exploitation of his physical
strength in bad faith or in violation of his honor" was no longer
tolerated. He had obligations to the community, but he shared these
obligations with every other member of the enterprise, from the chief
executive to the messenger boy. Finally, the German worker had clearly
defined social rights, which were arbitrated and enforced by
independent agencies. And while all this had been achieved in an
atmosphere of justice and moderation, it nevertheless constituted a
genuine social revolution..
Factories and shops, large and small, were altered or transformed to
conform to the strictest standards of cleanliness and hygiene:
interiors, so often dark and stifling, were opened up to light;
playing fields were constructed; rest areas where workers could unbend
during break, were set aside; employee cafeterias and respectable
locker rooms were opened. The larger industrial establishments, in
addition to providing the normally required conventional sports
facilities, were obliged to put in swimming pools!
In just three years, these achievements would reach unimagined
heights: more than two thousand factories refitted and beautified;
23,000 work premises modernized; 800 buildings designed exclusively
for meetings; 1,200 playing fields; 13,000 sanitary facilities; 17,000
cafeterias.
To assure the healthy development of the working class, physical
education courses were instituted for younger workers. Some 8,000 were
eventually organized. Technical training was equally emphasized.
Hundreds of work schools, and thousands of technical courses were
created. There were examinations for professional competence, and
competitions in which generous prizes were awarded to outstanding
masters of their craft.
Eight hundred departmental inspectors and 17,300 local inspectors were
employed to conscientiously monitor and promote these improvements.
To provide affordable vacations for German workers on a hitherto
unprecedented scale, Hitler established the "Strength through Joy"
program. As a result, hundreds of thousands of workers were now able
to make relaxing vacation trips on land and sea each summer.
Magnificent cruise ships were built, and special trains brought
vacationers to the mountains and the seashore. In just a few years,
Germany's working-class tourists would log a distance equivalent to 54
times the circumference of the earth! And thanks to generous state
subsidies, the cost to workers of these popular vacation excursions
was nearly insignificant..
Was Hitler's transformation of the lot of the working class
authoritarian? Without a doubt. And yet, for a people that had grown
sick and tired of anarchy, this new authoritarianism wasn't regarded
as an imposition. In fact, people have always accepted a strong man's
leadership.
In any case, there is no doubt that the attitude of the German working
class, which was still two-thirds non-Nazi at the start of 1933, soon
changed completely. As Belgian author Marcel Laloire noted at the
time:
When you make your way through the cities of Germany and go into the
working-class districts, go through the factories, the construction
yards, you are astonished to find so many workers on the job sporting
the Hitler insignia, to see so many flags with the swastika, black on
a bright red background, in the most densely populated districts.
Hitler's "German Labor Front" (Deutsche Arbeitsfront), which
incorporated all workers and employers, was for the most part eagerly
accepted. The steel spades of the sturdy young lads of the "National
Labor Service" (Reichsarbeitsdienst) could also be seen gleaming along
the highways.
Hitler created the National Labor Service not only to alleviate
unemployment, but to bring together, in absolute equality, and in the
same uniform, both the sons of millionaires and the sons of the
poorest families for several months' common labor and living.
All performed the same work, all were subject to the same discipline;
they enjoyed the same pleasures and benefited from the same physical
and moral development. At the same construction sites and in the same
barracks, Germans became conscious of what they had in common, grew to
understand one another, and discarded their old prejudices of class
and caste.
After a hitch in the National Labor Service, a young worker knew that
the rich man's son was not a pampered monster, while the young lad of
wealthy family knew that the worker's son had no less honor than a
nobleman or an heir to riches; they had lived and worked together as
comrades. Social hatred was vanishing, and a socially united people
was being born.
Hitler could go into factories-something few men of the so-called
Right would have risked in the past-and hold forth to crowds of
workers, at times in the thousands, as at the huge Siemens works. "In
contrast to the von Papens and other country gentlemen," he might tell
them, "in my youth I was a worker like you. And in my heart of hearts,
I have remained what I was then."
During his twelve years in power, no untoward incident ever occurred
at any factory he visited. Hitler was at home when he went among the
people, and he was received like a member of the family returning home
after making a success of himself.
But the Chancellor of the Third Reich wanted more than popular
approval. He wanted that approval to be freely, widely, and repeatedly
expressed by popular vote. No people was ever be more frequently asked
for their electoral opinion than the German people of that era-five
times in five years.
For Hitler, it was not enough that the people voted from time to time,
as in the previous democratic system. In those days, voters were
rarely appealed to, and when they expressed an opinion, they were
often ill-informed and apathetic. After an election, years might go
by, during which the politicians were heedless and inaccessible, the
electorate powerless to vote on their actions.
To enable the German public to express its opinion on the occasion of
important events of social, national, or international significance,
Hitler provided the people a new means of approving or rejecting his
own actions as Chancellor: the plebiscite.
Hitler recognized the right of all the people, men and women alike, to
vote by secret ballot: to voice their opinion of his policies, or to
make a well-grounded judgment on this or that great decision in
domestic or foreign affairs. Rather than a formalistic routine,
democracy became a vital, active program of supervision that was
renewed annually.
The articles of the "Plebiscite Law" were brief and clear:
1.The Reich government may ask the people whether or not it approves
of a measure planned by or taken by the government. This may also
apply to a law.
2. A measure submitted to plebiscite will be considered as established
when it receives a simple majority of the votes. This will apply as
well to a law modifying the Constitution.
3. If the people approves the measure in question, it will be applied
in conformity with article III of the Law for Overcoming the Distress
of the People and the Reich.
The Reich Interior Ministry is authorized to take all legal and
administrative measures necessary to carry out this law.
Berlin, July 14, 1933.
Hitler, Frick..
From the first months of 1933, his accomplishments were public fact,
for all to see. Before end of the year, unemployment in Germany had
fallen from more than 6,000,000 to 3,374,000. Thus, 2,627,000 jobs had
been created since the previous February, when Hitler began his
"gigantic task!" A simple question: Who in Europe ever achieved
similar results in so short a time?..
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, Joachim Fest limited
his treatment of Hitler's extraordinary social achievements in 1933 to
a few paragraphs. All the same, Fest did not refrain from
acknowledging:
The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social class above
all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it in fact
demonstrated class neutrality-These measures did indeed break through
the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the
material condition of much of the population. (J. Fest, Hitler, pp.
434-435.)
Not without reason were the swastika banners waving proudly throughout
the working-class districts where, just a year ago, they had been
unceremoniously torn down.
Topaz
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
Topaz
"We Have Ways of Shutting You Up!"
James Thurgood on characteristically one-sided democracy
"Reading the Jewish Chronicle (JC) is always instructive. Obtaining my
copy in my local newsagents is slightly embarrassing: people of 'the
faith' are numerous in my neighbourhood and when I step up to the
counter to pay there are often one or two of them queuing for the same
purpose. As they observe what I am buying, and then examine my person,
I can just imagine them muttering to themselves: "He doesn't look like
one of us!" One gentleman with a rather rabbinical appearance once
made so bold as to ask, with doubt in his eyes: "Are you Jewish?" I
replied negatively, of course. It then occurred to me to add,
mischievously: "I just believe in keeping an eye on them."
I could see the man's face crease into a frown, so thinking "In for a
penny, in for a pound," I went on to say: "You know, this is where you
get a lot of the real news - the sort you don't read in the ordinary
press."
I recalled that remark last month when wondering how the fraternity in
question were going to react to the rise of Jeorg Haider in Austria.
Actually, Haider has been making a number of apologies lately - for
instance for daring once to say something complimentary about Hitler's
employment policies. Well, what's wrong with that? the fact is that he
did put 6 million jobless Germans back to work in very quick time. I
believe anyway that politicians are almost always wrong to apologise,
and Herr Haider did not go up in my estimation on that account.
But of course, it is always the perception of what a politician is,
rather than the reality, that determines attitudes towards him. Haider
is perceived, rightly or wrongly, as some kind of neo-nazi monster.
Hence my curiosity.
The way Haider's success was greeted in the Jewish Chronicle was of
great interest to me - but more because of what it told me about the
writers in that paper and their attitudes than what was said about
Haider himself.
The JC was in a not-unaccustomed dilemma. The paper, of course, stands
for the loftiest principles of 'democracy'. But has not Haider risen
to his present powerful position in Austrian politics by the
democratic vote of the people? You see the problem!
The JC leader (4th February) spoke first about the very rapid manner
in which the other member states of the European Union reached
agreement as to what their response was to be to the prospect of the
Haider party having places in the Austrian Government. "They served
notice," it said, "that any role for Mr. Haider's party would prompt
them drastically to downgrade ties with Austria. This would, among
other things, involve shelving bilateral exchanges with the Austrians,
curtailing political contacts with Austrian envoys in EU states, and
refusing to back Austrian candidates for posts in international
organisations."
To which the ordinary rational person would no doubt react by saying:
"So what?" It is doubtful that great numbers of Austrians will be
applying at their chemist's shops for additional sleeping tablets on
those accounts. But we should read a little further.
Generally approving this Europe-wide reaction, the JC also admitted
its snags, acknowledging that it might make Mr. Haider yet more
popular at home. Yet, the leader continued:-
"This does not mean the outside world should abruptly change course,
abandon its position of principle and take a softly-softly approach.
It does mean that the underlying principle must be patiently, publicly
and articulately explained. The aim - it must be made clear - is not
to seek to exclude Austria and its people from the EU or the world
family of nations, nor to question the right of voters to choose who
governs them. It is to define bedrock tenets with which the world
community hopes to build a 21st century on lessons learned from the
bigotry and murder that too often marked the 20th. To the extent
Austria chooses to include in its government a party rooted in an
opposing vision of both the past and the future, to continue business
as usual would be illogical, and immoral."
Sting in the tail
You have to be something of a JC-watcher - which I might extend by
saying a watcher of the entire liberal, New World Order-oriented press
- to see the not immediately clear message here. It lies in the last
two lines, and the operative word is 'business'. This, I suspect,
means much more than just business in the diplomatic sphere -
cross-border contacts, appointments to international offices, etc. It
looks very much as if it could mean actual trade and commerce. Is the
Jewish Chronicle leader giving the first hints of a planned economic
boycott?
To get a clue as to the answer to that question, we might turn to an
article on Page 31 of the same issue by John Diamond, who was much
more explicit.
Mr. Diamond, of course, believes too in the democratic freedoms -
well, almost but not quite. There is, you see, democracy and
democracy; it all depends for whom. He is, he begins by saying, "...a
fully paid-up member of the freedom-of-speech brigade." He continues:
"I spent my formative political years telling anyone who would listen
that it was Voltaire who cracked the one about disagreeing with what
you say but defending to the death your right to say it."
But, he goes on.
"...then along comes little Austria, a paid-up member of the European
Union, and announces that its equivalent of the Conservative Party is
in an uncomfortable colloquy with its ultra-right-wing Freedom Party,
with the result that any day now the erstwhile annexe to the
Fatherland might once again have N***s in government. OK: they're not
National Socialists in the scientific sense, perhaps, but when you
have a party which talks about Aryans, immigrants and bloodied soil in
the way some in the Freedom Party do, it's hardly worth splitting
hairs."
By now, Mr. Diamond is clearly anticipating some people disagreeing
with his drift. He has prepared for that; he has an answer:-
"But hold on, say the other side: what about democracy? If Jeorg
Haider's chums go into the government or even, God forbid, run the
government, it will be as a result of the democratic will of the
Austrian people. Equally, Austria was elected into the EU by what
passes for democracy in that institution. We can't just kick them out
because we don't like the people they elect to power."
Now Mr. Diamond is really in full flow, and the reader can almost
predict what's coming next. He does not disappoint:-
"It's perceived to be the same argument that we liberals use when we
say that, much as we despise the British National Party, we regard its
right to erect websites, hold bring-and-buy coffee mornings and
publish maniacal brochures about how the Jews control the world as
inviolable. But it's not the same argument at all."
Why isn't it? - the reader will naturally begin to ask. But that
reader obviously is not aware that people like Mr. Diamond make the
rules in these matters - or at least that is their presumption.
Homosexuals, even paedophiles, may use the net. So may the spokesmen
for the IRA and other terrorist groups; you will not find the John
Diamonds objecting to this. All sorts of organisations, in addition to
this, may publish tracts claiming that such-and-such control the
world: Catholics, freemasons, Jehovah's Witnesses and little green men
from Mars. No problem! That's the freedom that Voltaire talked about,
and Mr. Diamond stoutly defends it. As he said, he's a fully paid-up
member of the freedom-of-speech brigade.
But when it comes to saying critical things about Mr. Diamond's own
people, that's different. You see the point?
'Dealing' with those Austrians
All this is building up to the most important thing that Mr. Diamond
wants to say. He has obviously been wrestling in his mind with the
question of how to say it, because he is aware of its contradictions.
He believes in democracy, as we have seen; but on the other hand some
democracy, for some people, just can't be allowed. So what are we to
do about Austria and Haider? Mr. Diamond has the answer:-
"...within the non-bellicose bounds of international diplomacy, we
have a limited armoury with which to deal with a party led by a
professed admirer of some of Hitler's policies. We have no right to
stop Haider saying such things, but we can say, in effect to Austria:-
" 'Elect whatever government you choose - that's your prerogative.
But, equally, it's our prerogative to stop trading with you, going to
your ski-runs, sending you our ambassadors or generally treating you
like civilised people. It's your loss, and the practical loss will be
greater than whatever gain you perceive there to be in sending a few
Turkish or East European immigrants home. Come back when you've
decided to stop being silly.'
"This is the way to deal with the nastier by-products of free speech.
It shouldn't, for instance, be necessary to pass laws to stop
right-wing fanatics from saying that evil Jews are taking over the
world. Simply make sure publishers know that, if they want to sell
such nonsense to true believers, they'll have problems selling other
books to the rest of us. Don't like a fascist website? There are
plenty of suppliers of Net facilities to the fascists who would lose
out if the rest of us stopped using their services."
Here, spelled out in as frank terms as we could wish for, is Mr.
Diamond's idea of how 'democracy' should work. It will be noted that
nowhere does he suggest that the arguments of people he thinks are
wrong should be countered in open and honest debate and proved, by
superior argument, to be fallacious. That, to most of us, is what
democracy has meant across the ages. But to Mr. Diamond? Oh no! In the
eyes of him and his ilk, it means something entirely different.
To him and his ilk, democracy means the right to suppress the views of
people you don't like by threats and intimidation - mainly economic
intimidation. Boycott their industries for a start! In Austria a big
industry is tourism. Very well, let's not visit their ski-slopes.
Where does this lead us? Shall we refuse to buy recordings made by
the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra? Shall we refuse even to listen to
Mozart, Haydn, Schubert or Strauss? After all, Mr. Diamond has
suggested that we should not treat the Austrians - out of whose ranks
have come these immortal geniuses - like "civilised people."
And extending the issue beyond Austria, it is clear that Mr. Diamond
believes that Internet suppliers who hire facilities to those of whose
politics he disapproves should simply be closed down - not by an act
of law (that would be too blatant) - but by ruining them by boycott.
Booksellers and publishers? Same treatment! Make sure hardly anyone
buys their books and they'll fold up. Business is business!
This then seems to be the ideal of democracy believed in by Mr.
Diamond - and many like him. Perhaps it's all part of the "bedrock
tenets with which the world community hopes to build the 21st
century." We cannot say we haven't been told!"
Spearhead Online
Topaz
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What is wrong with mixed-race sexual relationships?
>
They destroy the White race.
Topaz
wrote:
>
>So the Germans wanted a corridor through Polish territory. It was
>obvious that the Poles did not want such a corridor. Then the Germans
>blame the warlike Poles for not wanting to give up their territory.
>
>The Germans blamed the warlike French.
>The Germans blamed the warlike Norwegians.
>The Germans blamed the warlike Danes.
>The Germans blamed the warlike Dutch.
>And on and on and on...
>
Part of Poland was stolen from Germany after they lost the first
world war. If florida was taken from America, Americans would fight to
take it back. Actually, Americans feel free to start wars for any
reason, real or imagined.
Hitler gave the following communication to the British Ambassador:
"Poland's actual provocations have become intolerable. It makes no
difference who is responsible. If the Polish government denies
responsibility, that only goes to show that it no longer itself
possesses any influence of its subordinate military authorities.
In the preceding night there have been a further twenty-one frontier
incidents; on the German side the greatest discipline has been
maintained. The Polish side has provoked all incidents. Furthermore,
commercial aircraft have been shot at. If the Polish Government stated
that it was not responsible, it showed it was no longer capable of
controlling its on people."
This communication was handed and verbally read out to Sir Neville
Chamberlain, British Ambassador, 1.30pm 25th August 1939
Topaz
JEWS, WHY DON'T YOU LEAVE US ALONE?
WE DON'T NEED YOU TO CREATE A HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS
LIFE FOR US.
Wherever we settle on this earth, we get along well without you.
Now, nearly all white nations on earth are in an unstoppable decline
precisely because the Jews within their borders have assumed positions
to which they are not entitled: Not by virtue of their race, their
religion, their culture, nor due to their talents or nature.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR POLITICIANS
and your political system, a system designed to further your
interests, but which is alien to us because it is based upon lies and
deceit, corruption, terror and hypocrisy. For eons, our ancestors did
just fine when you were not around. They ruled themselves, it was a
rule according to their needs, wants and inclinations.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR ZILLION `EXPERTS' IN THE PRESS,
on TV, and radio to inform us of world events from the Jewish
perspective, or to tell us how to create a happier life. Without you,
before you were around en masse, our peoples were God-fearing,
cheerful and more satisfied than they are now.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR RACE-MIXERS, MULTI-CULTURALISTS,
"liberals", integrationists, socialist do-gooders, and promoters of
"diversity". Your ADL, Simon Wiesenthal Center, AJC and so many other
groups would do well to check for "diversity" and "integration" first
in their own offices before jumping on non-Jews who do not seem to
comply with your insatiable demands that all others, but NOT YOU,
abandon their heritage.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR "FINANCIERS".
Billions of people on this earth would be better off if there were no
Baruchs, Schiffs, Greenspans, Rubins, Milkens and all the others whose
principal aim seems to be to control the wealth created by others.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR LOAN SHARKS,
gangsters, porno kings, betting parlors, pimps and dope pushers. There
are still some areas in our lands where these "professions" are not
allowed, and everybody knows that in such areas little crime can be
found. We realize that without crime there would be fewer job openings
for Jewish judges, lawyers and even law professors at universities,
but we would gladly part with them.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR KIND OF GOVERNMENT MINISTERS
to rule us, your ambassadors to represent us, and your behind-the-
scenes administrators to tell us what to do with the land originally
cultivated and civilized (mainly) by Anglo-Saxons and Germans. Your
Kissingers, Albrights, Achtenbergs, Rubins, Holbrookes, Komblums and
Lawrences could never be in the same league with outstanding people
like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Benjamin
Franklin, to name but these few.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR "HOLLYWOOD",
with everything which this term means. The harm done to the gentile
mind through the incessant noxious effluent from "Hollywood" created
by you and your kind in the movie and TV- studios is inestimable. You
know of the harm done to our off-spring, or why else would you impose
a taboo on the question of what really causes young children to murder
their school mates and teachers? It is not the possession of guns.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR RABBIS
preaching brotherhood and tolerance to us, pushing a mythical
"diversity", while they, and YOU, are the most self-centered and
intolerant people on earth. How many "Goyim" do you allow in the top
echelons of the ADL, the American Jewish Congress, the Wiesenthal
Center or the "Presidents of the major Jewish Organizations"? None?
How come? Where is your tolerance and your continuously alleged desire
for diversity?
WE DON'T NEED THE MULTITUDES OF YOUR PROFESSORS
and teachers brainwashing our youth to the point where they have lost
all knowledge of our glorious past, and have developed a proclivity
for indecency, arrogance, dishonesty and crudeness.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR PROFESSIONAL HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS
(Elie Wiesel and Simon Wiesenthal come to mind,) who collectively have
created what Professor Butz called "The Hoax of the Twentieth
Century". Their insidious admixture of fact with fiction has created a
fairy tale that in later centuries may prove "the" text book case for
a successful, albeit temporary, propaganda coup of world-wide
dimensions.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR LAWS.
We don't need the rules and regulations you, above all, have imposed
upon us, and finally pushed down our throats as the "laws of the
land"; namely, the statutes pertaining to "affirmative action" "civil
rights", "separation of Church and State"; "immigration of Third World
peoples"; "special preferences for HIV- infected homos", "anti- Gun
control"; "school busing" --- their number is almost endless.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR LAWYERS;
private, corporate or governmental. Rarely has one single profession
caused so much harm to a nation as have Jewish lawyers (or, lawyers
imbued with a Jewish, Talmudic Weltanschauung) to the United States.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR "CELEBRITIES".
Television would be so much better without the likes of Seinfeld,
Koppel, Wallace, Rivera, Larry King, Barbara Walters and, not to
forget, Jerry Springer. We remember when Jews created good movies and
good TV series because the Jewish owners of studios and stations had
to be careful not to insult the sensibilities of the white viewers and
listeners? Now, with your power and influence being nearly limitless,
you believe you do not have to mind us anymore, and your true tastes
and inclinations come to the fore.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR PSYCHIATRISTS,
psychologists, school counselors and lonely hearts columnists. Our
peoples were far happier and mentally healthier without their advice.
If your immoral, unethical and nihilistic TV, radio, "educational" and
press propaganda had not destroyed the morals of the masses (and
thereby also caused the collapse of the family-oriented society,)
nobody would have to write to or talk to the likes of Ann Landers,
Abigail van Buren, or Laura Schlessinger.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR TIKKUN OLAM,
your belief that you, of all people, can repair or create a perfect
world. You must remember that, left all to yourselves, you, contrary
to us, could not exist. You would wither. Your Zionist entity in the
Middle East, the Jewish state of Israel. could not exist for a year
without financial assistance from abroad, mainly without tributes
garnered from America and Germany. And such a people wants to repair
the world? Get real! Furthermore, we consider the assumption of any
homo sapiens to be able to "repair the world", and create earthly
perfection, to be blasphemy.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR NEW YORK TIMES,
Washington Post, US. News & World Report, and the innumerable other
Jewish-owned and Jewish-controlled newspapers and magazines on earth
that provide such a skewed world view to our masses. Do you seriously
believe that your method of having mostly Jewish columnists digesting
the daily news for us improves our knowledge and mental health? Would
our H.L. Mencken or an Oswald Spengler today have a chance to see his
comments published? We doubt it.
WE DON'T NEED YOUR CONSTANT CALLS FOR CHANGE,
or progress, or reform, or growth, and revolution, etc., etc. Often
our peoples are quite satisfied with their situation in life as it is,
and your never ending endeavors to destroy the good that is, for
nebulous rewards in the future, create only unhappiness and mental
sickness.
WE DON'T NEED YOU, THE SELF-PROCLAIMED ETERNAL
INNOCENT VICTIMS
of the alleged bigotry of others, to impose guilt complexes on our
peoples. Whatever has happened to you in the past was usually a
reaction to your nefarious actions. Separate from us - we let you go
-, and you shall suffer no more, we hope. All by yourself you may
even create the earthly paradise of your dreams.
We don't want to see the world through Jewish eyes, something almost
unavoidable today. Abe Rosenthal, Charles Krauthammer and William
Safire must be stand-ins for thousands of your brethren of similar
ilk, persons who pre-chew every thought that might enter our minds,
and prevent our self-assertion where and when it is most needed. Your
people are masters at obfuscation, lies, deceit, and dishonesty
through selective reporting. The result of your attempts at trying to
alter the gentile psyche through mind-manipulation can only create
discord and dissension.
We know that you believe you are the best and brightest of human
beings, and that you enrich our lives immeasurably. But you are wrong.
We, as rational people, have to weigh one against the other: your
unquestioned talents in some fields of human endeavor against the
destructive effects you, as a collective, have on a broad spectrum of
our existence. Perhaps most of all, many of your efforts and endeavors
run counter to our ideal of what life is all about.
We also know that you have been told, and most of you seem to believe
it, that we "hate" you. That is why your fanatical activists have been
subverting the Constitution with so-called "hate" laws, most of which
were passed to assure special privileges and safeguards for you. But,
truly, honestly, we do not hate you. We hate your lies and your basic
dishonesty. We hate many of your nefarious actions. We hate when you,
as a collective (people, religion, tribe, sect, culture, nation,) try
to impose your immorality, your lack of ethics, and your odd and
archaic "Weltanschauung" on us. We hate it when you flagrantly enrich
yourselves on the fruits of our labor, and later claim that it was all
your accomplishment. But we especially hate what you do to our
children. You -most of all- are destroying their minds, and therewith
their future.
Therefore, - - - just BUTT OUT of our lives. Leave us alone. Let us
separate. You are so intelligent, you believe you are so much superior
to us, and you are the Chosen of your God. Show us what you can do by
yourselves by creating a viable entity just for your people
(parasitical Israel obviously isn't it.)
___________________________________________
The preceding is an excerpt of Hans Schmidt's book
END TIMES / END GAMES
ISBN 0-9669047-0-2
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number:
98-91037 (USA)
Topaz
<Miss....@Armoury.tv.il> wrote:
>
>They work hard.
>
>There is the old adage -
>
>Jesus may save, but Moses invests. -- Therein lies the difference
They are worthless parasites:
Here is a quote from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."
The money system we have today is called the debt-money
system. It is evil and needs to be replaced. The only way money comes
into existence today is when it is borrowed. There is no freely
existing money supply, but only borrowed money that needs to be paid
back to bankers with interest. If all the money that was owed to
bankers was ever paid back there would be no money left in circulation
and this would be a great depression. What makes matters even worse is
that when money is created only the principle of the loan is created.
The money needed to pay the interest is never created. For this reason
it is impossible to pay back the principle plus the interest on all of
the loans that make up our money supply. The extra amount of money
needed to pay the interest was never created and does not exist.
The United States government borrows money from the Federal
Reserve Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private
stockholders. It is in the business section of the phone book, not the
government section. Other banks also create the money in our money
supply. They are allowed to loan out much more money then they
actually have. Thus they create new money. No one else is allowed to
create money, only bankers have this privilege. All of our money is
debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the interest.
In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come
from the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by
the banks. And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of
the name. Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the
Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly
created money to the government in exchange for government bonds. To
simplify: The United States does not make its own money. Bankers
create the money and loan it to the United States with an interest
charge.
The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it this way:
"If there is only $10 in existence, and you lend it to someone
under the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he
has agreed to the impossible."
The book The Struggle for World Power put it this way:
"The Bank of England... was the first payment institution which
was legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and ,
therefore, the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not
only renounced its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to
borrow the privately-created money from the bankers...Not only the
thing being done, but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and
deception to conceal the essence of the deed. To create money out of
nothing is to make valid and effective claim on all goods and services
for no return, which is fraud and theft, made worse by the
circumstances that the money is lent out at interest...it follows that
those who have the power to 'create' out of nothing all the money in
each country and the whole world and lend it as stated, have total
power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press, individuals and
so on. Therefore the power of Parliament in general, and especially
with regard to money, is non-existent, and all the true sovereignty is
in the hands of those private individuals who issue all money"
robw
"what you are and I that sorrow evaporated"???
You talk like Injun Davey?
How much wampum in pocket?
Priceless!
Hey, we just got in a few hours ago.
What did you do last night?
Michael Ejercito
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 09:32:14 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> > What is wrong with mixed-race sexual relationships?
>
> They destroy the White race.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 04:14:00 +0000, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >So the Germans wanted a corridor through Polish territory. It was
> >obvious that the Poles did not want such a corridor. Then the Germans
> >blame the warlike Poles for not wanting to give up their territory.
>
> >The Germans blamed the warlike French.
> >The Germans blamed the warlike Norwegians.
> >The Germans blamed the warlike Danes.
> >The Germans blamed the warlike Dutch.
> >And on and on and on...
>
> Part of Poland was stolen from Germany after they lost the first
> world war.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Sat, 09 May 2009 11:30:55 -0700, Miss.Piggy
>
>
> >They work hard.
>
> >There is the old adage -
>
> >Jesus may save, but Moses invests. -- Therein lies the difference
>
> They are worthless parasites:
Michael Ejercito
> JEWS, WHY DON'T YOU LEAVE US ALONE?
>
> WE DON'T NEED YOU TO CREATE A HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS
> LIFE FOR US.
Michael
Topaz
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Topaz
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
is. He united State and Nation in Germany.
Only the eye-witness, who has experienced day by day, at the side of
Adolf Hitler, the wave of love and enthusiasm which greets him from
every class of German, can realize that such ovations, so rare in the
life of statesmen, signify no artificial feeling, but genuine
affection.. Hundreds, thousands throng the streets and roads, and
surge toward his car.. The scenes which we witness day by day are
touching and heart-rending. They are not isolated examples, but occur
everywhere.
The history of the National Socialist Movement shall be handed down to
posterity as the epic of the resurrected German Nation.
With indomitable will and unprecedented perseverance, which no
reverse can dishearten, this previously unknown man of the people,
with a few faithful adherents, dared to pierce the lines of the
Marxist terror.. He knows; terror is not overcome by intellect, but by
terror.
Adolf Hitler was not permitted to speak in public. The party lacked
the most essential means. It's existence during the following years -
probably the most arduous of its life - was one long series of
persecutions, muzzling, and trickery. Whoever admitted National
Socialism, was banished from civil life, from the decadent bourgeoisie
and from the class-conscious workers. The mere suspicion of National
Socialism meant the loss of employment and bread, boycott and ruin of
business interests, the inevitable acceptance of misery.
Hundreds, thousands were imprisoned by the November State Government.
Throughout the streets raged bloodshed and scenes of Marxist terror.
All the powers of hell were let loose against the advancing young
movement.
After twelve years of inconceivably laborious preparation, the
N.S.D.A.P. felt strong enough to knock at the door of power in the
Reich
But strong elements of economic opposition were still prevalent, and
these he attacked at the beginning of 1932.
Even today, I can picture this meeting of prominent men. We came for
Godesberg, and drove up to the Park Hotel, amidst the hooting of the
Marxists. The room was over crowded. Huddled together, sat the chief
West German magnates. There were familiar and unfamiliar faces. Men in
the public eye , and those quiet , but no less influential powers,
who, moving behind the scenes, control the fate of economy by the soft
sounds issuing from their private offices- men said to bear a ledger
rather than a heart.
Joyful expectation brightened the faces of those already converted.
But the vast majority bore an air of superiority and cool reserve-
probably flattered that Hitler had approached them. Mere curiosity,
and general interest lured them to the meeting. They wanted to hear
Hitler speak. They had no intention of being converted; the came to
criticize, seeking confirmation of their own infallible opinion.
Our leader received a chilly ovation; he spoke from a slightly raised,
projecting balustrade, he hands resting lightly on the iron railing. I
sat, amongst the listeners, taking notes, and observing the effect of
his speech which lasted for over two hours. From world political
perspective and with cogent logic, out leader elucidated the relations
between economy and politics, their reciprocal effect, and their
results in Germany. He explained the cause of the situation , and
proposed the only possible remedy.
The general impression upon this group of most impassive listeners was
astounding. After an hour, their chilly reserve gave way to intense
interest. Hitler spoke of the titanic struggle of his political
warriors, needy and persecuted, but making every sacrifice, even that
of life, for their nation. He contrasted the German youth's unselfish
idealism, personified in National Socialism, and the noble character
of working-class followers, with the lack of comprehension, the
materialism, and the heavy guilt of the purely economically
established Bourgeoisie. He pricked their social conscience without
causing offence.
They began to flush, fixed their gaze upon out Leader's lips, and it
seemed as if their hearts were moved. He spoke to their very souls.
Faint, then thundering applause greeted Hitler at the conclusion of
his speech; he had won a battle.
The Jewish and Marxist Press lied boldly next day that Hitler had
feasted with the industrial magnates on champagne and lobsters.
Actually, a few minutes later, the night say us on the road again,
bent on fresh work.
Next day, Hitler addressed with equal success the Crefeld Silk
magnates in Godesberg. Later the national club in Hamburg. Everywhere,
the scene was the same.
Those were daring journeys, fraught with danger, through the very
strongholds of the Marxist potentates who were on the track of their
hated, sworn foe.
But Adolf Hitler fought his way through. The number-plate of his car
was smeared with oil and coated with dust- quite indiscernible.
Then we held our first meeting in Goerlitz, where the attendance
exceeded the hundred thousand figure. All the roads were crowed with
masses of people on foot, on bicycles, and in lorries, all with the
same destination.
Hitler spoke as the stars arose in the heavens, and amidst the flaring
torches.
Now the crowds recognized the luminous plane carrying our leader, who
had just devoted his time to them. Cheers broke out from a hundred
thousand throats, drowning even the thunder of our motors, whilst the
crowds brandished flaming torches in greeting.
We have experienced the following fact; In Germany, wherever economic
and moral distress was greatest, wherever things seemed most
intolerable, there, confidence in our leader was strongest, and
gripped all the people.
Wherever our leader approached, every man and woman came out. Crowds
lined the streets. Aged grandmothers, on whose distressed faces the
direst poverty was written, raised their arms in greeting. Wherever we
stopped, the women stretched out their children towards our leader.
There were tears of joy and emotion.
They used to meet upon the Platterhof. Adolf Hitler would often come
in the night fog to the Platterhof, to take counsel with his friends.
The "Conservative State Idea" appropriated our ideas. The most ancient
political mummies of the past suddenly appeared upon the scene, and,
without shame, claimed the credit for out previous successes.
The Youth stood by Hitler, because it knew that he personified the
Nation's Youth. From the beginning, our leader had valued most highly
the immense importance of Youth for the movement. Not the old
generation, but a rising generation, uncorrupted by the destructive
poison of the world ideas of the ruling classes, could bear the new
Germany upon its shoulders.
Finally, on 30th January, 1933, our leader made the short drive over
the Wilhelmsplatz to the Reichskanzler's Office. Amidst boundless
cheers. The seige was over, the fortress had fallen, the gates lay
open.
The political lie had played a prominent role in all epochs of
parliamentary history. But such accumulations of lies and defamations
as our opponents have hurled against the awakening young Germany in
the course of our 13 years' struggle have not been experienced.
What National Socialist's blood does not boil, if he recalls the rapid
fire of press lies, that witches Sabbath of infernal songs of hatred,
which burst upon the National Socialist Movement every day?
The activity of the Marxist Press against National Socialism, by means
of profligacy, unscrupulous lies and base agitation of the public,
stands unrivalled throughout the press of the whole world.
But this systematic lying campaign of our opponents was always the
best evidence of the moral weakness of their own position. The more
desperate their situation was, the more unscrupulous became their
press agitation.
The agitation of the Jewish-Marxist Press against the N.S.D.A.P., has
been such an essential ingredient of our opponents' struggle during
all these years, that we would be guilty of historical forgery if we
did not lay due stress upon this lying campaign in our description of
the events.
The National Socialist Party has re-united people and State, it has
restored the people to the State, and the State to the people. In this
way, an organism, complete within itself, and comprising every
function of the life of the community, was born from the Nation
itself, in the midst of a decadent people and a corrupt State.
In Nuremberg, the Party represented the German people and the German
State, before the eyes of the whole world. This was a more complete, a
more morally dignified, and a more imposing representation than the
State and Nation have ever previously enjoyed.
If proves the recognition that a new valuation of men, a valuation
based upon the laws of nature, is beginning to force its way through
from the hearts of the European Nations. It is about to overcome
Liberalism, and replace it by a new conception of the living
community.
The democratic, parliamentary Liberalism apodictically claimed for
itself the eternal title of the most purposeful and best form of
representation of the peoples rights. At last with its own eyes, the
Nation has recognized National Socialism as the organization of
naturally chosen leaders. National Socialism's achievements in the
fields of Socialism, Economy, Administration, and Reformation of the
Reich, speak for themselves. In one sweep, these leaders have
accomplished what dozens of previous parliamentary, democratic
governments vainly attempted in the most deplorable way.
Probably it is an act of justice and compensation, that the German
Nation, so sorely afflicted by the world-war, is chosen to lead the
way to a better future for the nations.
Topaz
by VNN Staff
revised December 2005
Introduction
The text below shows that Jews may well have influenced Western
culture more than any other ethnic group, particularly over the last
few hundred years. It is important to note that our writers allege no
'conspiracy' by Jews. Rather, the examples cited point to an inborn
tendency of Jews to engage in behavior they believe will ensure their
group's safety, no matter its effect on the gentiles they live among.
To be sure, the Jews -- a race and also a religion -- have a long
history. But we will focus here on the past 200 years. We begin their
saga with the rise of the Rothschild banking family in Europe.
The Rise of the Rothschilds and International Banking
Of significance in Jewish history is how important the Rothschilds --
and other Jewish bankers -- were to the solidification of Jewish power
in the West. A large percentage of banks in the West was originally
founded by Jews, e.g. the Rothschilds, Jacob Schiff, and Paul and Max
Warburg. In fact, Meyer Amschel Rothschild and his sons virtually
invented modernized banking and finance. Not only did the powerful
Rothschilds control banking in Europe from approximately 1815 onward,
but they also purchased European news outlets -- including the Reuters
news agency -- giving them the power to influence the opinions of
millions of gentiles. Furthermore, political and social-reform actions
naturally require money; since they were far wealthier than even royal
families -- who were in fact indebted to them -- the Rothschilds were
in a unique position to be able to transform aspects of European
society to benefit the Jewish community.
Two features remain key to the power of the international bankers.
First, many bankers are related by marriage. By the end of the 1800s
many Rothschild cousins had married. Second, many top politicians in
the West have been indebted to the international bankers for providing
them with loans at critical times, such as when a Rothschild loaned
fellow Jew and Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli millions of pounds so
he could buy shares of stock for control of the Suez Canal area to
benefit England.
Perhaps nowhere have Jewish international bankers had a bigger impact
than in funding wars. For example, they funded the Japanese in the
Japan/Russia war of the early 20th century, which has been described
as the first war in which non-Whites defeated White men. Many Western
political observers assert that wars are waged for economic reasons,
and if that is true, then Jews, by their domination of international
banking, have been vital but unseen players in modern warfare.
The Founding of Communism
The ideology that would murder and enslave more people than any other
idea in human history was crafted in the 1840s by a German Jew named
Karl Marx. Like many Jews who wanted to hide within gentile society,
Marx's family converted to Christianity. Marx's ideology was called
communism, a social and economic system in which the government
controlled all forms of property and wealth. Marx based his communism
on the historic kahal, a Jewish communal living system. The kahal was
essentially an early form of communism, with community needs such as
food, living arrangements, and vocations allocated in a collective
manner.
Furthermore, the Soviet Union - which spread communism across the
earth - would likely have never been created if the part-Jewish
leftist V. I. Lenin (see elsewhere) had not been heavily influenced by
Marx's book Das Kapital. In fact, Das Kapital can be credited as
having transformed the young Lenin into a full-blown revolutionary -
another Jewish root of communism.
It should be noted by the reader that communism is, as an ideology,
more severe than Nazism, its sworn enemy. As an example, in Nazi
Germany a citizen could own a gun with a permit. But no citizen could,
or can, own a gun in any communist country. Nazism wasn't
totalitarian. It was politically authoritarian. But communism is
totalitarian in that every aspect of a citizen's life is rigidly
controlled. The number of people murdered by communism worldwide since
1917 approaches 100 million people - 20 million in Russia alone, by
conservative estimate. That number does not include the other millions
of people who were imprisoned, tortured or forced to flee their homes
due to communist aggression in Eastern Europe.
The Rise of Zionism
In the late 1880s, Jews began looking for a permanent place to evade
gentiles irritated by their behavior. The place they envisioned for
their exile was Palestine, portions of which Jews claimed they had
occupied over 2,000 years ago. Jews began a global campaign to
convince the world that they were entitled to 'return' to Palestine.
The leader of this so-called Zionist movement was Theodor Herzl.
Zionism provided the motive for a number of Jewish actions over the
course of the twentieth century, including the manipulations leading
up to the Balfour Declaration (covered below) and the exaggeration of
the severity of the so-called Holocaust. The state of Israel was
brought into being by Jewish terrorism, characterized by such acts as
the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 and the Deir Yassin
massacre in 1948.
To date, Zionism -- which the UN described as a form of racism in its
1975 Resolution 3379 -- has caused much trouble in the world, through
continual violence in the so-called Middle East involving Israel.
American (read: gentile) tax dollars fund the state of Israel to the
tune of billions a year, which is one of the chief causes of Arab
anger towards the U.S.
The Creation of the Federal Reserve Corporation
In 1913, the U.S. Congress authorized the creation of the Federal
Reserve banking system, which is also known as the Federal Reserve
Corporation. This private, non-governmental entity issues America's
money. The Federal Reserve pays the U.S. Treasury a small fee to print
'Federal Reserve Note' currency, which is later loaned to the U.S.
government.
The Federal Reserve system was created largely by the actions of
Jewish banker Paul M. Warburg. It is debt money because when the U.S.
government needs money -- i.e., more money than the U.S. treasury
receives from taxes -- it borrows the cash from the Federal Reserve
(such borrowing is now routine). The government then agrees to pay
back the money that it borrowed from the corporation with added
interest paid on the collateral for the loan (the collateral being
interest-bearing government bonds). That interest -- minus smaller
government debts such as foreign aid -- is the national, or federal,
debt, or, what America owes the Federal Reserve Corporation.
The Federal Reserve also controls interest rates and the amount of
money that circulates within America, giving it enormous power over
the U.S. economy.
As the debt money system continues to be used, America's national debt
climbs, leading to the American citizen being progressively over-taxed
through the silent theft of inflation.
Of significance is that the leadership of the Federal Reserve and the
key owners of the corporation's stock -- i.e., banks -- have been
disproportionately Jewish. Even today, a Jew named Alan Greenspan
heads that corporation. (How ironic that the same year that America
gave up control of its money to private bankers, Canada did as well
under the Bank Act of 1913. In fact, private banks control the money
of almost all Western countries, and yes, those banks are very often
owned or controlled by Jews).
WWI
Fact: America became involved in WWI due to Jewish intervention.
England was in danger of losing the war when Jews secretly approached
the British government with an unusual offer: the Jews, using their
powerful influence within American President Woodrow Wilson's inner
circle, would persuade Wilson to enter America into the war if the
British government would declare its support for the creation of a
Jewish homeland in Palestine. As a result of that offer, Wilson's
close Jewish advisors, such as Louis Brandeis, Bernard Baruch and
Rabbi Stephen Wise, urged Wilson to aid the British war effort by
committing American troops to enter WWI. Another Jew, Chaim Weizmann,
was the key player on the British side of the plan to inject America
into WWI. That the vast majority of the American people wanted nothing
to do with the European war, and that Wilson had campaigned on the
specific promise to keep America out of the war, turned out not to
matter. The will of the people was abandoned for the will of the Jews.
The British government pledged its support for the creation of a
Jewish state in a document that became known as the Balfour
Declaration. That declaration was issued after America had entered
WWI. The Balfour Declaration was written by one Jew, Leopold Amery,
and edited by another Jew, Louis Brandeis, who was the first Jewish
justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. The reader should be aware of the
fact that WWI led directly to WWII. In fact, many people feel that
WWII was merely a continuation of WWI.
'Russian' Revolution/Comintern Founded
Probably the most important event in recent history, aside from WWII,
was the so-called 'Russian' Revolution, which occurred in late 1917.
In that revolution, communists gained control of Russia, murdering and
enslaving millions of its citizens, most of whom were gentiles. Nearly
all of the top communists in Russia -- first called 'Bolsheviks' but
later 'Soviets' -- were Jewish and not from Russian stock. Their
leader, V.I. Lenin, was, as we mentioned previously, part-Jewish.
After Lenin's death, Joseph Stalin led the Soviet communists. Stalin
was not Jewish but he was married to a Jew (in his third, common-law
marriage). The Russian Revolution was financed by the Jewish banker
Jacob Schiff, who furnished the communists with millions of dollars.
After gaining control of Russia, the Soviets spread communism
worldwide through an organ of the Soviet government called the
Comintern. The Comintern sent agents around the globe to foment
revolutions which, it hoped, eventually would result in the
installation of communist regimes in every nation. The Comintern was
run by a Jew named Grigory Zinoviev. Because of the Comintern's
actions many countries around the world were later enslaved under
communist dictatorships, e.g. North Korea and Cuba. China was also
communized by Jewish/Soviet emissaries, e.g. Adolf Abramovitch Joffe
(aka Yoffe) and Mikhail Markovich Borodin.
It should be recognized that the mass murder that occurred in Russia
from 1917 onward was carried out almost exclusively by Jews, including
Lazar Kaganovich, Leon Trotsky, Yakov Sverdlov, Yakov Yurovsky and
Genrikh Yagoda. The few top Soviet officials who were not Jewish were
married to Jews, for example Rykov, Molotov, Dzherzhinsky and Bukharin
(not counting the previously-mentioned Stalin). Soviet communism had
racially-Jewish roots until Stalin became frustrated with their
domination of the government and purged a significant number of Jews
including Kamenev, Zinoviev, Radek, and Yagoda.
Of interest regarding the 'Russian' Revolution is that British leader
Winston Churchill wrote a newspaper article in 1920 titled "Zionism
versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People," in
which he echoed the coming Nazis in pointing out that that the
'Russian' revolution was led mostly by Jews. Churchill's
never-mentioned article is available on the web.
The Creation of the Versailles Treaty
Critically important to modern history was the Versailles Treaty of
1919, which carved Germany into pieces as the conclusion of WWI.
European states wanted to punish Germany for her role in the war, and
the way they did so was through that treaty. (It should be recognized
that WWI was not started by Germany, as is often claimed, but by
Austria-Hungary, which declared war upon Serbia in July 1914). Under
the questionable Versailles Treaty, parts of Germany were given to
various European countries including France, Poland, Denmark and
Belgium.
Most important about the Versailles Treaty, however, was the fact that
Jews were key advisors to most if not all of the top government
officials who attended the peace conference that produced it. The Jew
Bernard Baruch advised U.S. President Wilson at the conference, while
British Prime Minister Lloyd George was advised by the Jew Phil
Sassoon. And French leader Georges Clemenceau was advised by his
Jewish Interior Minister Georges Mandel aka Louis Rothschild.
Furthermore, Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise advised U.S. president
Wilson about matters surrounding the impending treaty before Wilson
left America to attend the peace conference. The Versailles Treaty
caused WWII to occur by default, culminating in Hitler attempting to
unravel the Versailles Treaty by invading Poland in 1939. The treaty
was unjust and several Western leaders admitted that it was, including
British Prime Minister A. Neville Chamberlain.
The Impact of Jewish Marxists/Socialists in pre-Hitler Germany
From just after WWI until the early 1930s Germany was in severe
turmoil. Among the worst of her troubles were communist
revolutionaries starting riots in German cities lasting as long as
five days. The riots were intended to destabilize Germany as a first
step towards communization of the country. Also among Germany's
troubles was incredible monetary inflation.
Most of Germany's troublemaking revolutionaries were Jewish. Karl
Radek, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg, for example. In fact, those
three people attempted coups in several European locations.
Furthermore, pre-Hitler -- aka Weimar -- Germany was run by a
government containing many Jews, such as Foreign Minister Walter
Rathenau. The Weimar constitution was even written by a Jew, Hugo
Preuss. Jews drove the leftist and Marxist movements in Germany, which
influenced, for example, such matters as art and architecture and even
sexual behavior. Weimar Germany's media were also largely in Jewish
hands, as were her financial institutions -- not surprising since Jews
tend to dominate these vocations in most Western countries.
Hitler Comes to Power, and the Frankfurt School Leaves for America
When Adolf Hitler assumed power in Germany in 1933, he set about
correcting the problems Germany faced. Among his actions were
imprisoning Jewish revolutionaries and strengthening the German
economy by the ingenious use of 'Mefo' bonds, which in a short time
transformed Germany's economy into the most powerful in Europe.
Indeed, Germany achieved full employment in four years under Hitler's
rule. (It is important to contrast Hitler's quick and successful
transformation of Germany's economy to American president F. D.
Roosevelt's failed attempts to rescue America's economy from a severe
depression. FDR's economic programs were largely 'artificial' in that
the government, not private business, created jobs via large projects
funded by U.S. tax dollars. In other words, tax dollars were used to
pay taxpayers).
Coinciding with the rise of Nazism, an influential group of Jewish
intellectuals fled Germany and came to America. This group, known as
the Frankfurt School, injected Marxist ideas into American life via
major U.S. universities. The Frankfurt School -- including such Jews
as Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm and Max Horkheimer --
profoundly changed America's social fabric. Indeed, much of the social
turmoil of the 1960s can be traced to the prior influence of these
Frankfurt Jews.
The Beginnings of WWII and the Role of FDR's Jewish Cabal
In the early 1930s, certain Jews began to set the stage for WWII. In
both Britain and America, Jews in important positions of power
maneuvered to get the British and American governments to actively
oppose Hitler's Germany. Furthermore, Jews themselves declared
financial 'war' on Germany just after Hitler took power. Such a 'war'
declaration occurred before Hitler had imprisoned the Jews or
curtailed Jewish legal rights. In other words, Jews struck the first
blow in their battle against Hitler's new regime.
It is important for the reader to understand that long before Hitler
had imprisoned the Jews or invaded any country, American president
Franklin D. Roosevelt officially recognized Germany's enemy, the
communist Soviet Union (in November 1933), That the president of a
free country would recognize a brutal communist state that had already
murdered millions of people -- a fact likely known to Roosevelt -- is
significant, and offers insight into Roosevelt's administration. Some
of the people surrounding Roosevelt were communists, for example U.S.
Treasury official Harry Dexter White. Other Roosevelt staffers were,
if not actual communists, then sympathetic towards communism, e.g.
FDR's vice-president Henry Wallace. Roosevelt himself told Congressman
Martin Dies that "several of the best friends I have got" were
communists (noted in the Congressional Record, Sept. 22, 1950, page
A6832).
The Jews in Roosevelt's inner circle persuaded him to treat both
Germany and Japan as dangerous enemies of America, which Roosevelt
did. Concerning Britain, powerful Jews such as Bernard Baruch worked
to push top officials in the same direction. (Of note regarding
England vis-a-vis Germany is that when Winston Churchill was in severe
debt due to gambling losses, he became indebted to Baruch since Baruch
helped rescue him from bankruptcy[2]; the world will likely never know
to what lengths Churchill was willing to go to return Baruch's favor.
Furthermore, Churchill deeply disliked Germany, and possibly envied
Hitler's success).
When President Roosevelt suggested in a speech in 1937 that America
might have to wage war in the near future, watchful Americans knew
that war with the future Axis powers -- Germany, Japan and Italy --
was imminent. Such an early suggestion of war, years before WWII
began, gave good insight into Roosevelt's intentions.
Roosevelt knew that war with Japan would provide a back door through
which America could enter WWII. That entry would allow America to help
defeat Hitler for the benefit of both world Jewry and England. FDR
knew that if he punished Japan - an ally of Germany - past a certain
point, the Japanese would attack America in retaliation. In fact, as
historian Harry Elmer Barnes pointed out in his 1953 book "Perpetual
War For Perpetual Peace," FDR began to antagonize Japan soon after
becoming president in 1933. In the end, FDR and world Jewry got
exactly what they wanted: the defeat of Nazi Germany, the biggest
threat to ever face world Jewry and international leftism. It must be
clearly understood: WWII was all about Germany and the Jews. Japan was
but a secondary issue, despite outward appearances to the contrary.
Before WWII began, Jew-dominated Hollywood played a crucial role in
persuading American citizens that Hitler and the Germans were
dangerous to America's safety. For example, Hollywood produced movies
that portrayed the Germans as wanting to take over either America or
the entire world. One such film was "Confessions of a Nazi Spy,"
starring Jewish actor Edward G. Robinson.
Jews were also key players in silencing people who opposed the growing
anti-Germany movement in America. Prominent citizens who questioned
the dangerousness of Germany to America were labeled "isolationists"
and fiercely criticized. Those isolationists, such as famed aviator
Charles Lindbergh, were unofficially blacklisted in America, their
voices silenced by a concerted campaign funded largely by Jewish
money. Jews funneled money into many anti-Germany organizations, such
as the Fight For Freedom Committee, which received some winking
support from Roosevelt's administration.
Also of note concerning the beginnings of WWII was Hitler's unique
economy. Among other features, the German economy had a barter system
that cut out the international Jewish bankers. For example, Germany
traded trucks to Argentina in exchange for grain. Instead of both
Germany and Argentina approaching international bankers for loans at
high interest rates, both countries simply bypassed the lenders via
barter. Such exchanges angered the Jew-dominated global financiers. As
a result, economic warfare was directed against Germany by Jew-led
factions fearful that other nations might copy her example.
The event that officially started WWII, Hitler's invasion of Poland,
can be explained by the fact that Hitler was attempting to reverse the
unfairness of the Versailles Treaty and reclaim traditionally German
territory. Hitler asked Poland at least twice to return the city of
Danzig and the Polish Corridor to Germany before invading in 1939.
Poland refused. Also of significance is that after Hitler invaded
Poland, he offered to pull his troops out of that country if he could
keep Danzig and the Corridor. Britain and France refused Hitler's
offer. (Did they prefer war instead?)
Of further importance concerning WWII is the fact that Hitler probably
did not realize how influential Jews were in shaping the policies of
the British government in 1939. Hitler likely thought that he was
opposing only gentiles in England. What he probably did not realize
about Britain was that, like most European governments, Britain was
beholden to powerful Jews. Those Jews not only aided the British
government financially, they also traveled in the highest social
circles, having been named 'barons' and 'lords' long before. The Jews
received those lofty titles not for their heritage but instead for
their important financial services to the British government. In fact,
ever since Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews to return to England in
the 1650s (they had been expelled by King Edward the First, known as
"Longshanks," in 1290), Jews had exercised significant influence on
political and social events in England.
The popular idea that Britain and France had to guarantee Poland's
borders by declaring war on Germany after Germany invaded Poland is
wrong. Days after Germany invaded Poland, the Soviets invaded as well,
from the opposite side. Britain and France did not then declare war on
the Soviet Union. Why did England and France allow the Soviets to
invade Poland but not Germany? The 1939 Anglo-Polish treaty which led
to WWII, and not the secret protocols of it, did not specify which
countries Britain would defend Poland against. Additionally, that
treaty -- the Agreement of Mutual Assistance -- was not properly
ratified since it did not 'sit' for 21 days under the Ponsonby Rule,
as was normally required under British policy. Translation: Britain's
guaranteeing of Poland's borders was unlawful.
Most important of all, however, about WWII is that there is now clear
evidence that certain powerful men had planned to remove Hitler from
power long before he invaded Poland. As outlined in the book Which Way
Western Man? by William G. Simpson, both Winston Churchill and various
powerful Jews began making plans to topple Hitler as early as 1935, by
any means necessary. For example, U.S. General Robert E. Wood told a
U.S. Congressional committee that Churchill told him in 1936 that
England must "smash" Germany. That such a comment came 3 years before
WWII began is of critical historical importance.
The Defeat of Germany and the Creation of the Morgenthau Plan
The defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 was not simply a military victory
for the allies. It amounted to the revenge of world Jewry. The biggest
racial threat to the Jews in recent history -- Nazi Germany -- had not
merely been defeated in war but had been virtually wiped off the map.
Entire cities such as Dresden were burnt to the ground. Millions of
innocent German citizens were either killed, injured or left homeless.
All traces of the former German culture were destroyed. People having
no official role in the Nazi government were executed by the allies,
such as Julius Streicher and Alfred Rosenberg. Other former Nazi
officials were tried and hanged by the allies at Nuremberg using ex
post facto laws, hearsay evidence, and confessions gained under
torture administered by interrogators - who were often Jewish. Of
significance is the fact that as early as December 1942 the allied
powers had decided to prosecute German military personnel for war
crimes committed during WWII.
Roosevelt's August 1944 comment that the entire German people -- not
simply former Nazis -- should be "castrated" to prevent them from
reproducing reveals the Roosevelt administration's attitude towards
Germany in general. U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower said that the top
German officials should be punished beyond the death penalty, whatever
that might have meant. Of possible interest regarding 'Ike's' comment
is that Eisenhower's nickname at West Point military academy was 'The
Swedish Jew.' Also, no castration suggestions were offered by allied
leaders concerning the Japanese people, even though the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor caused America to enter WWII in the first
place. Also of importance is the fact that two Jews -- Henry
Morgenthau, Jr. and the communist Harry Dexter White -- wrote the U.S.
government's Morgenthau Plan, which restructured post-war Germany to
Jewish benefit. A greater example of a conflict of interest would be
hard to find.
Also regarding the matter of post-war Germany, after the war the
director general of the organization in charge of providing food and
housing for homeless Germans (the United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitation Administration, or UNRRA) was a Jew, Herbert Lehman.
UNRRA's chief advisor was also a Jew, David Weintraub.
Jews also played key roles in the prosecution of German military
personnel for war crimes committed during WWII. For example, in the
Malmedy massacre trial (U.S. vs. Valentin Bersin, et al.), the chief
interrogator of the accused German soldiers was a Jew, William Perl.
The chief prosecutor, Burton Ellis, was also a Jew. The chief
assistant prosecutor was a Jew as well, Raphael Schumaker.
Jews were also key players in the U.S. Office of War Information
(OWI), which created anti-Axis films, posters and photos for
propaganda purposes. That propaganda was used to influence the
attitudes of Western citizens towards Germany and Japan. Among the
Jews who worked for OWI were James Paul Warburg, Bernard M. Baruch,
Herbert Marcuse and Leo Rosten. Jews also helped 'de-Nazify' German
military personnel and the German public after WWII, and conflicts of
interests often occurred when that happened. For example, Jewish
Marxist Herbert Marcuse a) advised the allies about how to portray
German fascism to the Western public via mass media; and b) wrote a
handbook for the allies concerning de-Nazification. The
de-Nazification of Germany is so complete today that a German citizen
risks a stiff jail sentence if he merely utters a pro-Nazi comment in
public.
The Founding of the UN
Not only was the 'architect' of the United Nations, Leo Pasvolsky,
Jewish, but among the most important people involved in the founding
of the UN in 1945 were Jewish communists, such as Victor Perlo, Harry
Dexter White and Solomon Adler. The UN is a global entity of
considerable power which has influenced the cultures of many Western
countries. For example, in the late 1940s America adopted at least
some educational ideas that were created by a UN department called
UNESCO (i.e., those found in their Towards World Understanding
report). Those ideas concerned the content of textbooks in American
schools. President Truman's Commission on Higher Education endorsed
the ideas, which included teaching children about the benefits of
"international government" (aka 'surrendering much of your country's
autonomy to a global body').
The controversial 1951 UN/UNESCO 'Statement on the Nature of Race and
Race Differences,' which denied human racial differences and altered
peoples' attitudes about race, was largely the invention of infamous
Jewish anthropologist Ashley Montagu. That statement seemed to further
highlight the ongoing Jewish agenda on race. Another example of that
agenda: as far back as 1935, Franz Boas -- the Jewish godfather of
race-denial who inspired Montagu's efforts -- approached two top
scientists and asked them to create an anti-racism/race-denial
statement, which would be signed by many other scientists and then
publicized. Both of the scientists that Boas approached,
anthropologist and psychologist Livingston Farrand and biologist
Raymond Pearl, turned Boas down. Not one to give up easily, Boas then
approached yet another race expert, anthropologist Earnest Hooton.
Hooton agreed to create such a race statement (he sent it to seven top
scientists but only one signed it).
Amazingly, the UNESCO race statement claimed that Jews are not a race
or ethnic group, even though Jews contract 'Jewish diseases,' such as
Tay-Sachs disease.
Other top experts who created race-denying/race-downplaying material
for the UN or UNESCO were also Jewish, including Melville Herskovits,
Otto Klineberg and Harry Shapiro. In fact, Jews pioneered the
false-but-ubiquitous 'official' theory that racial differences between
Whites and non-Whites do not really exist. The teachings of the Jews
mentioned above were used to drastically alter Western culture, e.g.
in arguing for the enactment of civil-rights legislation.
Despite the usual UN stance on Israel/Palestine, the UN has been good
for Jews, i.e. the UN's social leveling programs and equality-for-all
ideology have drastically lessened 'anti-Semitism' worldwide.
The Control of Eastern Europe After WWII
Not only was Russia controlled by Jews for many years, but countries
in post-war Eastern Europe were as well. For example, communist Poland
was run by Jewish figures including Jacob Berman, Boleslaw Bierut and
Colonel Jozef Rozanski. Communist Romania was run by people such as
Ana Pauker, Avram Bunaciu and Valter Roman. Hungary's communist
government was also heavily Jewish, for example Mathias Rakosi, Ernest
Gero and Michael Farkas. Under the leadership of those Jews, hundreds
of thousands of people -- most of them gentiles -- were murdered,
tortured or imprisoned throughout Eastern Europe.
The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) Investigations
In 1947 the U.S. Congress, via the House Un-American Activities
Committee (HUAC), began investigating the Hollywood film industry due
to charges that Hollywood had been infiltrated by communism (it had
been). A large number of actors, directors and screenwriters were
members of the Communist Party and as such were getting marching
orders from the Soviet Union. During that period, a group of people
known as the Hollywood Ten refused to answer questions before the HUAC
committee. They were then charged with contempt of Congress. A
disproportionate number of the Hollywood Ten were Jews, including
Herbert Biberman, Samuel Ornitz, Ring Lardner, Jr. and Albert Maltz,
as were the people who were 'blacklisted' during that era. (A
blacklisting meant that a person could not work in Hollywood due to
his political activities.)
Of important note concerning HUAC was how that committee -- and the
similar McCarthy committee later on -- was portrayed by the media and
Hollywood. HUAC's mission - identifying people who were attempting to
communize America on behalf of the Soviet Union -- was described as an
un-American 'witch hunt.' Declassified U.S. and Soviet government
reports, such as the Venona Intercepts, show that those 'witch
hunters' were correct: communists had infiltrated many areas of
American society.
Significantly, the majority of American communist leaders have been
Jews, including Herbert Aptheker, Victor Perlo, Jay Lovestone and
Benjamin Gitlow.
The Founding of Israel
Immense and concerted pressure was placed upon U.S. President Harry
Truman so that he would endorse the idea of creating a Jewish state in
Palestine. Naturally, most of that pressure came from Jews. Indeed, at
one point Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler led a group of Jews to the
White House. There, during a conversation with Truman, Celler pounded
on the president's desk and said that if Truman did not give his
blessing for a Jewish nation, "we'll run you out of town." In fact,
Truman said that "extreme Zionists" had threatened him. Also of note
is the fact that Truman's Jewish friend Eddie Jacobson contacted
Truman to urge him to support a Jewish state. But before Jacobson
contacted Truman, Jacobson was briefed on Palestinian matters by Dewey
Stone, a Zionist leader (which might make one wonder how Jacobson came
to contact Truman and on whose behalf he might have been acting).
The creation of the state of Israel was extremely important to the
Jews. Most of all, it gave them legitimacy. They were no longer seen
as a small tribe of 'troublemakers' who moved from country to country
getting evicted nearly every time. Now they were a people with their
own country and the trappings that go with it: ambassadors, a large
army and nuclear weapons. The Jews had finally arrived on the world
stage.
It should be understood that Israel was literally founded on
terrorism: Jewish revolutionaries, such as Menachem Begin, shot and
blew-up British soldiers, foreign diplomats and scores of Arabs in a
violent effort to reclaim 'their' land. (Ironically, Israel now
condemns and fights terrorism).
Today, the Zionist lobby in Washington, D.C. wields enormous power
over Congress. As a result, Congressmen dare not criticize Israel in
public; those who do are usually not re-elected. Another result of
Zionist power in Washington is the ever-increasing funding of the
state of Israel by U.S. taxpayers.
Arabs and Muslims throughout the world hate America and most other
White countries because they see those countries as partners and
protectors of Israel, which they are - especially America.
The Cold War
The 'cold' war between America and the Soviet Union, which began just
after WWII and which was centered around both countries' nuclear
arsenals, became more sophisticated and more expensive as America
entered the 1950s. Billions of U.S. tax dollars were spent on atomic
weapons and various security features both inside and outside of the
U.S.
Of importance is the fact that the Cold War would never have occurred
in the first place if Jews hadn't created the Soviet Union.
Ironically, Jews a) were prime figures in creating America's first
atomic weapons program, called 'The Manhattan Project'; and b) were
also key players in networks which secretly provided U.S. atomic
weapons technology to the Soviet Union, e.g. the Rosenbergs, Harry
Gold and Robert Soblen. (For more information on the transfer of
atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, see the Fuchs-Gold or the
Rosenberg spy ring cases in American historical documents).
The Increased Use of the Word "Democracy" in America
As the Jewish foothold in the American publishing world became more
solid, there appeared an increased use of the term "democracy" within
books, newspapers and magazines to describe America.
The U.S. constitution contains no mention of "democracy," nor did
America's founders use that word. America was created instead as a
White republic in which only White males could vote or hold public
office, and the Jews are very aware of that fact.
The U.S. Civil-Rights Movement
The history of the 1950s-1960s civil-rights movement might go
unnoticed by many White citizens if it were not for the fact that that
movement was created and steered by Jews, not by Blacks. Indeed, the
NAACP was founded by and run for many years by Jews, such as the
Spingarn brothers. Other important Jews in the NAACP included Henry
Moskowitz, Lillian Wald, Jack Greenberg and Kivie Kaplan.
The groundbreaking Brown v. Board of Education court ruling in 1954
resulted almost entirely from the work of Jewish lawyers and activists
connected with the NAACP, for example Jack Greenberg. Indeed, the
legal brief for Brown was signed almost exclusively by Jews. Jewish
activist Esther Swirk Brown was also a prime player in the Brown case.
In fact, Swirk Brown actually launched the Brown case herself.[3]
It could be said that, within the U.S. Congress at least,
Representative Celler (see elsewhere in this essay) launched the Black
civil-rights movement in America via his House bill H.R.6127, which
when signed into law became the first civil-rights law created since
the 1800s: the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
Furthermore, the constitutionally questionable U.S. Civil Rights Act
of 1964 came from a Jew, i.e. Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
7152. That act created, among other things, affirmative action. It
ended the practice of business owners deciding for themselves whom to
hire and fire. In fact, the destruction of White rights in America was
caused largely by the Jew-created and Jew-led civil-rights movement.
(Of possible interest to the reader is that the Civil Rights Act of
1964 created the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC), which is responsible for ensuring that private employers obey
the racial mandates of Title VII of the Act. Perhaps not surprisingly,
two Jews, Alfred and Ruth Blumrosen, were key players in the
construction of the EEOC, and Alfred was also the commission's first
compliance chief (and is also referred to as its conciliations chief).
Mr. Blumrosen shaped the racial quota guidelines that the EEOC would
follow for decades to come. In fact, Blumrosen could be considered to
be the godfather of racial quotas in America - at least as far as
federal enforcement of racial quotas in employment is concerned.[4]
Furthermore, Sonia Pressman, a Jewish EEOC attorney, was a prime
figure in the movement to extend the EEOC's reach to include
gender-discrimination-in-employment into its legal jurisdiction.
Pressman worked with NOW, a feminist group containing many Jews, in an
attempt to force the EEOC to become more involved with gender bias
matters).
The civil-rights movement also transformed the attitudes of American
Blacks: before the civil-rights movement Blacks were largely
respectful of Whites. Today Blacks openly denigrate White culture and
challenge White authority. They demand that 'whitey' now show them
respect which they may or may not have earned.
The Vatican's 1965 'Nostra Aetate' Declaration
As Look magazine noted in January 1966, in an article titled "How The
Jews Changed Catholic Thinking," a Jew named Jules Isaac approached
the Vatican about a possible Catholic condemnation of 'anti-Semitism.'
His action resulted in the famous, official Vatican ruling that the
Jews were not responsible for Jesus Christ's death. The ruling was a
very significant victory for all Jews worldwide. Of importance is that
after the Vatican statement was issued, Jews did not then issue a
similar declaration admitting to and condemning Judaism's historic and
harsh anti-gentile attitudes - attitudes which pre-date Christianity.
U.S. Immigration Law Altered
Jews have also led the movement in the U.S. Congress to open America
to non-European immigration. The best example of that is the 1965
Immigration Act, aka the Hart-Celler Act, which resulted in a
revolutionary change in U.S. immigration rules. Congressman Celler was
the point man for that law, even though he is listed second, after
Hart, in the title 'Hart-Celler.' Indeed, President Johnson mentioned
Celler twice at the signing of the bill, H.R. 2580, into law on Oct.
3, 1965, but did not mention Hart. Other Jews in Congress such as
Jacob Javits and Herbert Lehman also spearheaded the movement to allow
more non-Europeans into America. An influential Jew and immigration
lawyer named Edward Dubroff regularly advised Congressman Celler about
immigration issues.
Additionally, powerful Jewish organizations carried out intense,
ongoing campaigns in order to pressure individual Congressmen to vote
for the loosening of U.S. immigration laws. At nearly every step of
the campaign to alter U.S. immigration rules, Jews were at the
forefront.
The Rise of American Leftism and Counterculture
Not surprisingly, the American political Left was built largely by
Jews as well. For example, Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid
the foundation for the American 'hippie' counterculture via his
popular book One-Dimensional Man (1964). Other famous Jews who led the
1960s hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul
Krassner. Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement from behind
the scenes by publishing, writing for, or editing leftist newspapers
and magazines. And anti-war/college activism groups were
disproportionately filled with Jews, too, e.g. Students for a
Democratic Society (SDS), the top leaders of which were Jews, for
example Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and Mike Klonsky.
Similarly, most of the leaders of the feminist movement have been
Jews, for example Betty Friedan, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Lucy Komisar
and Gloria Steinem. Most of the leaders of the homosexual-rights
movement have been Jews, such as Larry Kramer, Alan Klein and Arnie
Kantrowitz. Gun control in the U.S. Congress has been dominated by
Jews such as Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Howard Metzenbaum.
Indeed, Jews created two landmark anti-gun laws in the 1990s: the
Brady law, which came from Howard Metzenbaum and Charles Schumer, and
the assault-rifle ban, which came from Dianne Feinstein and Schumer.
In fact, America's first significant anti-gun legislation, the Gun
Control Act of 1968, came from Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
17735. Probably the most disturbing anti-gun legislation in recent
years - for gun owners and constitutional-rights advocates alike -
came from Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg, whose domestic confiscation
provision became law in 1996. That law prevents someone convicted of a
certain misdemeanor crime from owning a gun. In other words, a
misdemeanor conviction abolishes a constitutional right that our
gentile Founders gave us.
Even the famous 1969 Woodstock rock-and-roll concert was created by
Jews: Michael Lang, Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
Furthermore, a Jewish man named Elliot Tiber persuaded yet another
Jew, Max Yasgur, to allow the Woodstock concert to be held on Yasgur's
farmland.
Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
The Growth of Hollywood and the U.S. Media
Of tremendous importance to America's culture is that the Hollywood
film community, and the American media as well, is dominated by Jews.
In fact, Jews founded the major Hollywood movie studios, e.g. Carl
Laemmle (Universal Pictures), William Fox (Fox Film Corp.), Louis B.
Mayer (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures).
Some of the more well-known Jews in modern Hollywood and the media
include film directors Steven Spielberg and Woody Allen, the Disney
Co.'s Michael Eisner, actors Dustin Hoffman and Kirk Douglas,
comedians Milton Berle and Don Rickles and news journalists Mike
Wallace, Barbara Walters and Ted Koppel (more information about Jews,
Hollywood and the media can be found in the essay "Who Rules America?"
by National Vanguard Books, available on the web or in their book
catalogue).
Indeed, as the 1960s hippie revolution was occurring, another
revolution of sorts was happening in Hollywood. Jewish network
executives began to churn out movies and TV shows featuring Black
actors in leading roles. Hollywood also produced a notorious movie
that featured an interracial relationship, which was still taboo at
the time. It is apparent that the Jews in Hollywood, believing that
the pro-White attitudes of America's Founders would never return,
became much bolder during the 1960s. (Regarding the Founders'
attitudes about race, a law created in the Founders' era, 'Act of
March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104),' stated that only Whites could become
American citizens. In fact, non-Whites had no significant rights in
America until the XV Amendment was created in 1870).
As America entered the 1970s it became common for White Americans to
see Blacks, Jews and even Asians in prominent vocations on TV shows
and in movies. Those minorities were seen portraying judges, police
detectives and attorneys on screens big and small all over the U.S.
Non-Hollywood media also flourished in America from the 1960s onward.
The news departments at most broadcasting companies were run by, or
heavily staffed by, Jews. Major U.S. newspapers also came under Jewish
control as small newspapers were bought out by big media conglomerates
which were dominated by Jews. Furthermore, as American culture was
being socially 'Jewified,' so were the cultures of other Western
countries being similarly Jewified via American movies and TV shows,
which became popular in many countries. America served as a base of
sorts for the exporting of Jew-created movies and TV shows which
featured leftist and politically-correct messages, which served
various Jewish social objectives.
The Rise of Big Capitalism
Big capitalism drives corner grocers out of business and outsources
jobs to third-world countries. It encourages materialism. And it leads
to the importing of inexpensive goods in massive quantities, which
also causes American jobs to vanish.
Even though Jews are known for their leftist behavior, they
nonetheless pioneered giant capitalism and corporatism. Jews
especially pioneered conglomerates, in which one large company owns a
dozen smaller companies.
The Rise of Neoconservatism
Beginning in the 1980s, the conservative or "right-wing" political
movement in America was slowly overtaken by what is known as the
"neoconservative" movement. The neoconservative ideology is not really
conservative but is instead politically moderate, and is even liberal
regarding certain issues like civil rights. The neoconservative
movement was launched by formerly-liberal Jews and its current leaders
are mostly Jews. The neoconservative movement's main focus is on how
to use America to protect the interests of Israel.
Neoconservatism has resulted in America being alienated from many
former allied countries in the world, e.g. France.
Neoconservatism has now almost completely replaced traditional
conservatism in America, with genuine conservatives now consigned to
the margins of politics and often referred to as "racists" or
"bigots."
The Bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks
In October 1983, 220 U.S. Marine Corp soldiers were killed in a
suicide bombing of their barracks in Beirut, Lebanon. The Marines were
stationed in Beirut due to Israel's actions - most especially because
of Israel's role in the 1982 massacre of hundreds of Palestinians at
the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut.
Today, the barracks bombing is but a distant memory, and few people
connect the event with Israel.
Holocaust Remembrance Emerges as a Growth and Guilt Industry
Since the 1970s, the Jewish memorializing of the Holocaust has become
an industry of enormous and ever-increasing size. So powerful and
industrialized is Holocaust-remembrance-mania that some American
states require, by law, the teaching of Holocaust education in public
schools. Law-enforcement training academies often mandate Holocaust
studies as well.
The Sept. 11, 2001 attack on America/the 2003 Iraq War
The terrorist attack(s) upon the United States on Sept. 11, 2001
transformed not only America but also the rest of the West. It caused
all of the White Western countries to reexamine, and then rebuild,
their security apparatuses, at significant financial expense. More
than that, it changed how those countries viewed the Arab world, since
the attack appeared to have been planned and carried out by Arab
extremists.
As a result of the 2001 attack, the U.S. Congress passed a
heavy-handed law called the "USA PATRIOT Act." That law canceled or
curbed many of the rights that Americans had traditionally enjoyed -
rights that the Founders had included into the Bill of Rights.
It is no longer a secret that the reason the United States was
attacked by terrorists in Sept. 2001 was because of America's vigorous
support of Israel. Put another way, Jews caused the Sept. 11, 2001
attack, albeit indirectly, for if it wasn't for powerful Zionist
political influence in Washington, D.C., the United States would not
have been so staunchly supportive of Israel. (In fact, America didn't
vigorously support Israel until the 1973 Middle East war. Shortly
after that war, a Jewish-American diplomat, Henry Kissinger, created a
strong, lasting partnership between America and Israel by engineering
a document called the "Memorandum of Understanding." That document
created, for all practical purposes, the so-called "special"
relationship that now exists between the two countries).
The 2001 terrorist attack upon the U.S. also led to America's
involvement in the 2003-present Iraq War, since the former event was
used in a vague, roundabout way as an excuse for American soldiers to
invade and occupy Iraq.
Of significance regarding America's involvement in the Iraq War was a
committee within America's Pentagon called the Office of Special Plans
(OSP). The OSP was designed to funnel information about Iraq directly
to the White House, thereby bypassing the usual filters that such
information would normally travel through, i.e. other governmental
intelligence agencies. According to news sources, shortly before the
Iraq War, the OSP provided President George W. Bush with certain
information about Iraqi weapons programs. That information was
incorrect, but nonetheless it was later used by the White House as a
reason for American soldiers to invade Iraq - an invasion carried out
for Israel's benefit [5].
The OSP was staffed by a number of Jews, such as Harold Rhode, Douglas
Feith and OSP director Abram Shulsky. Feith, and various other
so-called "neoconservatives," had a history of suggesting an attack
upon Saddam Hussein's Iraq dating back to the 1990s, e.g. they were
involved in the creation of a 1996 policy paper that mentioned
"removing Saddam Hussein from power" [6]. That such a removal idea
emerged years before the pre-war "discovery" of Saddam's "weapons of
mass destruction" is significant. Furthermore, under OSP's watch,
Israeli officials came and went at the Pentagon in the days prior to
the Iraq War (apparently to aid American war efforts) while observing
few of the standard security procedures intended for visitors [7].
Also, the OSP itself was conceived by a Jew, Paul Wolfowitz, and
further, it worked closely with an anti-Iraq committee located within
the Israeli government, a committee which was similar to OSP in its
anti-Iraq aims [8].
It should be noted that the major claims of OSP regarding Iraq - that
Saddam had ties to the terrorist group Al Qaeda and that he possessed
"weapons of mass destruction" - proved to be false.
It is probable that without the actions of Jews, the Sept. 11, 2001
terrorist attack upon America and the 2003 Iraq War would not have
occurred, nor would America be such a vigorous supporter of Israel. In
fact, it is easy to conclude that America would have no significant
"Arab problem" if not for Jews.
The Creation of the U.S. Anti-Semitism-Monitoring Office
In 2004, an office was created within the U.S. State Department to
"monitor" anti-Semitism worldwide, despite the fact that 1) that
department insisted that it did not want such an office to be created;
and 2) America is not a Jewish country.
The legislation which created the anti-Semitism-monitoring office,
called the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, came from Jewish
congressman Tom Lantos as bill H.R. 4230.
It was a big victory for the Jews. That office gave world Jewry a
powerful, 'official' weapon with which to combat people who oppose
Jewish supremacism and/or Zionism. (One might wonder how it's the
business of the U.S. government if, for example, anti-Semitic acts are
committed in Thailand. One might also wonder why there are no U.S.
government offices designed to monitor anti-White, anti-Black or
anti-Christian behavior worldwide).
Like the previously-mentioned OSI and the neoconservative movement, we
again see the Jews using the U.S. government as a tool with which to
further their racial agenda.
Summary
The information above shows that the impact that Jews have had upon
the world -- and especially upon the West -- during the past 200 years
is remarkable. Important questions arise from the impact of the Jews:
without their actions, would WWII have occurred? Would America have
had a 50-year Cold War with the Soviet Union? Would the Soviet Union
even have existed in the first place? Would the Vietnam War have
occurred? Would America be as politically liberal as it is today?
Would America have been involved in wars in the Middle East? Those are
questions for Westerners to ponder at length.
Even more remarkable is how the Western public never hears about the
influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist' or
'socialist' are used to describe Jewish social activists in the West
but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that that lack of mention of the
Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to their tremendous
power. By using a) frequent mentions of the Holocaust; b) the media;
c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and e) significant political
influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to their ends. Gentiles who
complain about that Jewish rebuilding -- and their own dispossession
as a result of it -- are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and marginalized into
ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined above is, again, not
a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive behavior by them,
which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
oppressed yet again, or, will be again expelled from Western countries
(Jews have been expelled from most Western countries at one time or
another).
Also curious, and telling, is the fact that even though the religion
of Judaism is based upon bigotry, that fact is rarely mentioned by
modern Christians. Their silence about Judaism's hatred is both
widespread and quite noticeable, as if Christians are constantly
checking themselves to ensure that they aren't uttering "anti-Semitic"
words or phrases. In other words, the power of the Jews is so great
that it actually produces self-censorship within the world's Christian
communities.
Finally, it is interesting to note how quickly Jews accomplished the
rebuilding of America, the Western powerbase of the Jews: in roughly
50 years. Before President Roosevelt took office in 1933 Jews had
little influence upon American culture on the whole. But by 1983 Jews
dominated American culture via television, movies, newspapers,
magazines and other cultural organs. That a people constituting just
2.5% of the U.S. population could significantly alter the culture of
the most powerful country in the world in such a short time is very
significant. Also significant is that there is not a single
educational institution anywhere in the United States in which you
will see the facts about Jews and their interests assembled and
presented in logical connection as we have here.
Michael Ejercito
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:10:06 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >On May 10, 3:31 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 9 May 2009 09:32:14 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > What is wrong with mixed-race sexual relationships?
>
> >> They destroy the White race.
> > How so?
>
> Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
> nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
> country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
> of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
> Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
> preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> Otto Dietrich
>
> The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
> immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
> soul.
No, the Reich was destroyed in 1945.
Michael
Yap
>
> read more »
Your message is being directed at Americans, rather than the Jews.
Or, perhaps they are the same?
Yap
> Rex Ballard wrote:
> > On May 3, 6:10 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net>
> > wrote:
> >> Since a lot of people in these newsgroups think our problems are caused by
> >> Jews, let's all imagine that there were never any Jews. What would the world
> >> look like now? "Now" would not be 2009 but some other date to celebrate
> >> some other god. The Roman Empire would still be governing the world.
>
> > Actually, if there were no Jews, that is if there had never been the
> > Exodus, there would have been no Roman Empire. The Roman culture was
> > based on Greek culture, the Greek culture based on Babylonian
> > influences, and all of these were heavily influenced by Jewish
> > communities thriving within them.
>
> > During the Babylonian Exile, the Jews, now displaced from their
> > homeland, preserved their culture, religeon, and technology, teaching
> > each child to read and write in Hebrew. Later, the Septuagint was
> > translated to Greek, so that Jews in Greek occupied territories could
> > know the culture of their forfathers.
>
> > This teaching of reading and writing made Jews very popular as
> > teachers, especially since many of the concepts in the Torah were
> > principles that were good for any leader, and helped many leaders
> > organize their kingdoms and empires.
>
> > So without the Jews, it is quite likely that Europe and Asia would
> > still be lots of little fifedoms, fighting and raiding each other,
> > with no clear distringuished leaders, because each leader would have
> > been limited in how much he could govern before losing his power to
> > other rivals.
>
> > Without the Jews, we might have never gotten out of the "Dark Ages"
> > where there were no kings, no laws, and viking like tribes would
> > simply plunder the farms shortly after the harvest.
>
> > Without the Kosher laws, there would have been no study of health and
> > disease control, so diseases ranging from food poisening to sexually
> > transmitted diseases to genetic disorders resulting from inbreeding
> > would have wiped out huge populations almost any time people attempted
> > to gather into cities. There would have been no aquaducts, no sewers,
> > and no sanitation. Even small towns would become deadly places.
> > Farms would be scattered, and each farmer would have avoided his
> > neighbors for fear of getting infected or cursed.
>
> > If civilization had formed, it might have been more likely that there
> > would have been no Agustus, and many more like Caligula and Nero,
> > perhaps many centuries of despots and men corrupted by their own
> > power. There would have been no Solomon to Aspire to.
>
> That's an interesting read and, to be sure, Jews have made some valuable
> contributions to humanity. You assume, though, that if not the Jews, God
> would not have "chosen" another tribe.
1. There is no god.
2. The chosen people have no believe in the so-called god.
AndrewJH
> FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western country at
> one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France, Portugal and
> Germany.
>
> FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks,
> newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled
> by Jews.
>
> FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime
> (such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number
> of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR
> MORE FREQUENTLY.
>
> FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top
> communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all
> the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by
> Wall Street Jews.
>
> FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of
> destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.
>
> FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remained in
> charge of the organization till 1970.
>
> FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false,
> (and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the
> Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous
> Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories
> acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of
> homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings
> and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six
> Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these
> widely-believed but false stories is illegal in most countries of the
> Western world, and 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for
> questioning these and similar dogmas. Can you figure out what powerful
> international ethnic group was responsible for causing these laws to
> be passed?
>
> FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the
> Holocaust has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion
> dollars to Israel by the German government. Furthermore, Jews
> everywhere continue to use the Holocaust as a tool for extracting
> money from gentiles, whether thru the movies (more than 400 have been
> made on this subject), Holocaust museums, 'reparations' (more than a
> billion from the Swiss, billions from German companies, etc) and the
> like. There is a saying widely used among Jews which goes, "There's no
> business like Shoah [Holocaust] business." Can you figure out why the
> Jewish establishment has been so eager to suppress questioning of the
> Holocau$$$t dogma?
>
> FACT: Israel is the only 'Western' country to legally sanction
> torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and
> shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters.
>
> FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force
> attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms
> enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the
> major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the
> Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify
> freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for
> suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers
> of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American
> culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts.
>
> Sourcehttp://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/Lbl-VitalFactsYouNeedToKnow.html
>
> http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
>
> http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
>
> http://heretical.com/
Kinda hit nerve didn't I. Looks to me like your jealous of Jews.
Better jobs, Better educated. Pretty girl friends. Tastes real bitter
doesn't it.
Topaz
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
>> Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
>> preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
> Portugal's fall had nothing to do with racial inter-marriage.
>
That is easy to say, just as it is easy to say the cow jumped over
the moon, or the dish ran away with the spoon. But assertions are
worthless on usenet. Politically correct assertions are the worst.
They prove that your TV set does all your thinking for you.
Look at Europe and look at Africa. It is race that makes the
difference. They didn't have naked head hunters in Europe with bones
in their noses. Clearly Portugal fell because of race-mixing.
Topaz
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On May 11, 3:10�pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> �Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
>> Otto Dietrich
> It was a road to ruin.
From a German pamphlet:
Do you remember the state of Germany and the German people in the days
before the aged Reich President von Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler and
his party as the last hope of saving Germany from certain political,
social and economic collapse that would lead to chaos? Tens of
thousands of factories had closed their gates. Millions of workers and
employees lost their jobs and were thrown ruthlessly into the gray
misery of mass unemployment. There seemed no way out...
By the end of 1933, 2 million citizens had jobs again. By September
1936, the number of unemployed had fallen beneath a million. By 1937
unemployment had vanished...
One of the foundations of National Socialism is the knowledge that
only work creates value and prosperity...
But not only the dreadful misery before 1933 reduced the desire of
countless Germans to have children. Crass egotism and materialism also
played a role. The System Era saw having children as foolish and
backward. The transformation that has occurred is clear in the rising
German birth rate...
The National Socialist state gives major tax reductions to fathers for
each child. Families with three or more children receive payments of
10 and 20 marks monthly. By the end of 1937, 510,000 children were
receiving such support...
By the end of 1937, 252,000 mothers had received free vacations...
The Winterhilfswerk is the most beautiful expression of the new German
people's community. It is not the work of a small group of rich
people. No, each German, all of us, rich and poor, manual laborers,
farmers and city-dwellers cooperate in fulfilling the F�hrer's will:
No German may be hungry or cold!
One does not know whom to admire more: the cheerful willingness of
those who collect, or the rising amount of the gifts, to which even
the poorest contribute their share. The success of the
Winterhilfswerk, written permanently into the law of 1 December 1936,
demonstrates the efforts of the entire German nation. Gifts of money
alone totaled over 920 million marks during the four winters from
1933/34 to 1936/37. An additional 570 million marks of goods were
contributed. 50,000 freight cars alone would have been needed for the
potatoes contributed in the past years. The three million meters of
clothing given out by the WHW would stretch from Berlin to the Middle
East. The two million kilograms of coal would form a wall ten meters
high around all of Germany. These few examples, and more could be
given, prove the strength of the German people's will to be active
socialists..
Another sign of this socialism is the entirely different status of the
German worker in factories. The social honor of each working German is
guaranteed by law. The state's representatives ensure that exploiting
workers is impossible. The legal working conditions correspond to
National Socialism's high opinion of work. Workers have a right to a
vacation and for paid holidays, even hourly and temporary workers.
There is nothing like this elsewhere in the world.
The dignity of labor is evidenced by improvements in the appearance of
the work place. Wherever one looks in Germany, ugly dark buildings are
vanishing. The "Beauty of Labor" movement in today's Germany is not
empty talk or an impossible demand, but living reality. Large sums
that formerly would have been wasted in strikes and lockouts have been
used since 1933 to improve work places. 23,000 places have been
transformed form soulless drudgery to pleasant places to work. 6,000
factory courtyards now offer space for real relaxation, which was not
true in the past. 17,000 canteens and lounges, 13,000 shower and
changing rooms have been transformed. The dirtier the work, the
cleaner the workers. More than 800 community buildings and 1200 sport
facilities , including over 200 swimming pools, have been established.
The crew quarters in over 3500 ships have also been improved.
The NS Society Kraft durch Freude brings cheer and pleasure to
workplaces through concerts and art exhibits. The art exhibits alone
introduced more than 2,5 million workers to the creations of true
German art. Just five years ago, it was obvious that the great works
of German culture belonged to a small group of the upper class.
Besides the factory concerns and art exhibitions, the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude uses theatrical performances, other concerts, singing and
musical groups to introduce the creations of German art to every
working German. 22 million citizens have attended theatrical
performances..
Of no less importance is the KdF's vacation program. Earlier, German
workers did not know what to do with their, at best, five days of
annual vacation. They could not visit the beauties of the German
landscape, much less travel abroad. The NS Society Kraft durch Freude
gave German workers the possibility of vacationing at the beach or in
the mountains, or to explore the homeland. Over 20 million have
participated in KdF trips since 1934. That is more than a quarter of
Germany's population. 19 million citizens participated in 60,000
vacation trips at home. Hand to hand, they would stretch from Berlin
to Tokyo. KdF trains have traveled 2,160,000 kilometers, or 54 times
around the world. The nine large KdF cruise ships have covered a
distance equal to twice the distance from the earth to the moon. They
have carried German workers to Madeira, Italy and Norway, broadening
their horizons and giving them unforgettable experiences. Three
additional ships will be added the KdF's own fleet of four. A KdF
resort is being built on the island of R�gen. It will not be the only
one. A series of other vacation and spa resorts will be built. They
will fulfill the F�hrer's wishes at the start of the NS Society Kraft
durch Freude: to lead a cheerful, creative and strong people to
success in the world.
The goal of bringing German culture to the entire German people,
regardless of their income, is especially clear with the German radio.
Thanks to the People's Radio Set, a solid, inexpensive and capable
receiver, the number of radio listeners has risen from around 4
million in 1932 to 9.1 million today. The un-German programming of the
System Era has been transformed by National Socialism. Now radio
acquaints the German people with the work of their great masters of
music and literature. Alongside these artistic programs, the
entertaining programming provides for the relaxation of hard-working
people.
Clear proof for the rising prosperity of the German people is provided
by the growing consumption of foodstuffs and luxury items of every
variety. During the prewar year 1913, only a little more than 2.9
million tons of meat were consumed. In 1937, that figure had risen to
3.7 million, up about 5% from 1932. Thanks to the elimination of
unemployment, bread consumption increased by about 10%, sugar by 15%.
Butter consumption rose from 420,000 to 519,000 tons. Milk production,
both for drinking and for making butter and cheese, rose from 23.5 to
25.4 billion liters from 1932 to 1937. Coffee consumption rose from
104,000 to 140,000 tons. Beer consumption has risen from 3.3 to 4.4
billion liters. That is an increase of about 3 billion glasses of
beer...
The growing prosperity and rising consumption of foodstuffs and luxury
items required hard work. A people can only consume what it produces.
In the face of this obvious truth, which however only became clear to
us after 1933, all the parliamentary resolutions, all the decisions of
international conferences and the demands of the international unions
become silly talk. The German people have proved that by our own work.
Germany has worked untiringly since 1933, producing itself the goods
it needs to improve its standard of living.
The rising production in all areas, which has never before been seen,
is the fruit of our work. The foundation of our life is agriculture,
whose task is to guarantee that the nation is fed. When the F�hrer
took power, agriculture was in a ruinous state. Officers of the court
were regular visitors at German farms. The animals and the harvest
were seized ruthlessly because taxes and interests had risen to
impossible levels that German soil could not meet. Forced auctions
drove tens of thousands of German farmers from their land. Desperation
prevailed in the villages. As a result of the desperate situation,
agriculture could not ensure the feeding of the German nation. The
ghost of hunger threatened.
Here too the F�hrer set to work immediately. Interest and taxes were
lowered, and the German soil was freed from usurious capital. Between
1927 and 1931, German agricultural debt rose by 2,9 billion marks.
From 1933 to 1936, it fell by 800 million marks. The interest burden,
which was over a billion marks in 1931/32, was reduced by National
Socialist actions to 630 million marks. The crowning achievement was
the creation of the Reich Inherited Farm Law, which guaranteed that
the German family farm will always remain the wellspring of the
nation...
Just as for farmers and agricultural workers, the urban population is
also being cared for. Although more than enough willing and able
workers were available in 1932, and although the housing need was
certainly great, the government put workers on the dole and built only
141,265 dwellings. This was an area in which the need for new jobs was
particularly clear. Even in 1933, the number of new dwellings rose to
178,000, with particular attention being given to small and mid-sized
units for those with limited incomes. This number grew year by year,
reaching 340,000 dwellings in 1937, double the number of 1932. In all,
National Socialist has built more than 1.4 million new, and above all
healthy and affordable, dwellings for the German people since 1933.
This is enough to house the entire population of Berlin...
Growing prosperity and production led to a growth in traffic. The
entirely neglected German highway system had to be repaired and
expanded. 40,000 kilometers of highway have been repaired since 1933.
That is enough to go all the way around the world! Then there are the
Reich Autobahns, the most splendid construction project in the world.
2,000 kilometers were open to traffic by the end of 1937. 1,000
kilometers more will be added yearly, until Germany has a highway
network unique in all the world.
Automobile production has reached a level that no one would have
thought possible a few years ago.
The number of motor vehicles in Germany has doubled, exceeding the 3
million mark in 1937. Thanks to the growing prosperity, broad circles
of our nation can now afford a car. 137,141 of the new vehicles in
1937, well over half, were purchased by workers and employees. 30,015
workers and employees were able to buy a car the previous year. Cars
are becoming both better and cheaper. The increase in cars will be
even more striking when the Volkswagen comes on the market. Enormous
factories are even now being built. The best proof for the quality and
good pricing of German cars is the fact that automobile exports have
increased by a factor of eight since 1932!..
The great improvements in the German transportation system have
resulted in a growing stream of foreign visitors. The pulsing life in
Germany is drawing more and more visitors to the Third Reich. The
number of overnights by foreigners has risen from 2.7 million in 1932
is far above 7 million in 1937. These foreigners, who often come to
Germany with false ideas, see with their own eyes the work of the
F�hrer and the remarkable efforts of the German people. They return
home as the best witnesses of the greatness and strength of the German
Reich...
The F�hrer has repeatedly reminded the German people that strong
policies are the absolute prerequisite to our economic, social and
cultural health. Only intentional hostility and stupidity can still
deny that the F�hrer was right in every respect...
>
>>
>> � The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
>> immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
>> soul.
> No, the Reich was destroyed in 1945.
>
True, the bad side won the war.
Topaz
wrote:
Americans are ruled by the Jews.
Topaz
Dave Heil
> Leon Degrelle
>
> "We have the power. Now our gigantic work begins."
> Those were Hitler's words on the night of January 30, 1933, as
> cheering crowds surged past him, for five long hours, beneath the
> windows of the Chancellery in Berlin.
Scarcely twelve short years later, Adolf Hitler would be dead. His
Thousand Year Reich would be dead and the German capital would be rubble.
So much for grandiose dreams and the megalomania of a dictator.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
Final score: The Soviet Union 1, Berlin 0. Herr Goebbels would expire
before time.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 04:14:00 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>> So the Germans wanted a corridor through Polish territory. It was
>> obvious that the Poles did not want such a corridor. Then the Germans
>> blame the warlike Poles for not wanting to give up their territory.
>>
>> The Germans blamed the warlike French.
>> The Germans blamed the warlike Norwegians.
>> The Germans blamed the warlike Danes.
>> The Germans blamed the warlike Dutch.
>> And on and on and on...
>>
>
> Part of Poland was stolen from Germany after they lost the first
> world war.
Stolen? Sorry, Topie. Aggressors who become the losers in war, do not
get to dictate the surrender. Germany should not have declared war the
first or second time.
If florida was taken from America, Americans would fight to
> take it back.
"Floriday", not "florida". America didn't lose Florida in a war.
> Actually, Americans feel free to start wars for any
> reason, real or imagined.
We're in the middle of a war with terrorists, Topie. I wouldn't go
around looking like a foreign or domestic terrorist if I were you.
> Hitler gave the following communication to the British Ambassador:
>
> "Poland's actual provocations have become intolerable. It makes no
> difference who is responsible. If the Polish government denies
> responsibility, that only goes to show that it no longer itself
> possesses any influence of its subordinate military authorities.
How'd that work out for old Adolf? It turned out that it *did* make a
difference who was responsible. Heh.
Dave Heil
>
> JEWS, WHY DON'T YOU LEAVE US ALONE?
I haven't seen any Jews posting here and attacking white screwball
groups. Why don't you leave Jews alone? Why not stop posting all of
your hatred toward them?
Dave Heil
Michael Ejercito
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 17:30:32 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
> >> Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
> >> preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
> > Portugal's fall had nothing to do with racial inter-marriage.
>
> That is easy to say, just as it is easy to say the cow jumped over
> the moon, or the dish ran away with the spoon. But assertions are
> worthless on usenet. Politically correct assertions are the worst.
> They prove that your TV set does all your thinking for you.
>
> Look at Europe and look at Africa. It is race that makes the
> difference. They didn't have naked head hunters in Europe with bones
> in their noses. Clearly Portugal fell because of race-mixing.
>
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 17:31:11 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >On May 11, 3:10 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> >> Otto Dietrich
> > It was a road to ruin.
>
> From a German pamphlet:
>
> Do you remember the state of Germany and the German people in the days
> before the aged Reich President von Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler and
> his party as the last hope of saving Germany from certain political,
> social and economic collapse that would lead to chaos?
Michael
Topaz
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
Topaz
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Explain how race-mixing caused Portugal to fall.
>
The people became less White (less intelligent and creative).
Michael Ejercito
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> > Explain how race-mixing caused Portugal to fall.
>
> The people became less White (less intelligent and creative).
Michaek
Michael Ejercito
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
Age of consent laws are your misfortune.
Topaz
wrote:
>
>Stolen? Sorry, Topie. Aggressors who become the losers in war, do not
>get to dictate the surrender. Germany should not have declared war the
>first or second time.
By Mark Weber
Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
December 1941. Roosevelt's aid to Britain and the Soviet Union in
violation of American neutrality and international law, his acts of
war against Germany in the Atlantic in an effort to provoke a German
declaration of war against the United States, his authorization of a
vast "dirty tricks" campaign against U.S. citizens by British
intelligence agents in violation of the Constitution, and his
provocations and ultimatums against Japan which brought on the attack
against Pearl Harbor-all this is extensively documented and reasonably
well known.[1]
Not so well known is the story of Roosevelt's enormous responsibility
for the outbreak of the Second World War itself. This essay focuses on
Roosevelt's secret campaign to provoke war in Europe prior to the
outbreak of hostilities in September 1939. It deals particularly with
his efforts to pressure Britain, France and Poland into war against
Germany in 1938 and 1939.
Franklin Roosevelt not only criminally involved America in a war which
had already engulfed Europe. He bears a grave responsibility before
history for the outbreak of the most destructive war of all time.
This paper relies heavily on a little-known collection of secret
Polish documents which fell into German hands when Warsaw was captured
in September 1939.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
These documents clearly establish Roosevelt's crucial role in bringing
on the Second World War.
Poland had refused to even negotiate over self-determination for the
German city of Danzig and the ethnic German minority in the so-called
Polish Corridor. Hitler felt compelled to resort to arms when he did
in response to a growing Polish campaign of terror and dispossession
against the one and a half million ethnic Germans under Polish rule.
In my view, if ever a military action was justified, it was the German
campaign against Poland in 1939.
Poland's headstrong refusal to negotiate was made possible because of
a fateful blank check guarantee of military backing from Britain-a
pledge that ultimately proved completely worthless to the hapless
Poles. Considering the lightning swiftness of the victorious German
campaign, it is difficult to realize today that the Polish government
did not at all fear war with Germany. Poland's leaders foolishly
believed that German might was only an illusion. They were convinced
that their troops would occupy Berlin itself within a few weeks and
add further German territories to an enlarged Polish state. It is also
important to keep in mind that the purely localized conflict between
Germany and Poland was only transformed into a Europe-wide
conflagration by the British and French declarations of war against
Germany.
On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy
Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role
in making American foreign policy:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State
Department is becoming ever more powerful ...
... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis
which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general
catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.
in their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created
real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and
communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred
against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by
every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans
are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which
wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean
of blood.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly
come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is
inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of
propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation
and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is
growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans
and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be
subdued by the 'democratic world.'
Ambassador Potocki's report from Washington of 9 January 1939 dealt in
large part with President Roosevelt's annual address to Congress:
President Roosevelt acts on the assumption that the dictatorial
governments, above all Germany and Japan, only understand a policy of
force. Therefore he has decided to react to any future blows by
matching them. This has been demonstrated by the most recent measures
of the United States.
The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda
which is under Jewish influence and continuously conjures up the
specter of the danger of war. Because of this the Americans have
strongly altered their views on foreign policy problems, in comparison
with last year.
Of all the documents in this collection, the most revealing is
probably the secret report by Ambassador Potocki of 12 January 1939
which dealt with the domestic situation in the United States. This
report is given here in full:
The feeling now prevailing in the United States is marked by a growing
hatred of Fascism and, above all, of Chancellor Hitler and everything
connected with Nazism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews
who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical
press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents
Germany as black as possible-above all religious persecution and
concentration camps are exploited-this propaganda is nevertheless
extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and
knows nothing of the situation in Europe...
It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign
which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia
is almost completely excluded. If mentioned at all, it is only in a
friendly manner and things are presented in such a way as if Soviet
Russia were working with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the
clever propaganda the sympathy of the American public is completely on
the side of Red Spain.
Besides this propaganda, a war psychosis is being artificially
created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging
only by a thread and that war is unavoidable. At the same time the
American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war,
America must also take an active part in order to defend the slogans
of freedom and democracy in the world.
These groups of people who occupy the highest positions in the
American government and want to pose as representatives of 'true
Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' are, in the last analysis,
connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.
For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the
interests of its race, to portray the President of the United States
as the 'idealist' champion on human rights was a very clever move. In
this manner they have created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and
hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile
camps. The entire issue is worked out in a masterly manner. Roosevelt
has been given the foundation for activating American foreign policy,
and simultaneously has been procuring enormous military stocks for the
coming war, for which the Jews are striving very consciously. With
regard to domestic policy, it is very convenient to divert public
attention from anti-Semitism, which is constantly growing in the
United States, by talking about the necessity of defending religion
and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.
On 16 January 1939, Polish Ambassador Potocki reported to the Warsaw
Foreign Ministry on another lengthy conversation he had with
Roosevelt's personal envoy, William Bullitt
1. The vitalizing of foreign policy under the leadership of President
Roosevelt, who severely and unambiguously condemns totalitarian
countries.
2. United States preparations for war on sea, land and air will be
carried out at an accelerated pace and will consume the colossal sum
of 1.25 billion dollars.
3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain
must put an end to any sort of compromise with the totalitarian
countries. They must not get into any discussions aiming at any kind
of territorial changes.
4. They have the moral assurance that the United States will abandon
the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the
side of Britain and France in case of war. America is ready to place
its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.
The Polish Ambassador to Paris, Juliusz (Jules) Lukasiewicz, sent a
top secret report to the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw at the beginning
of February 1939 which outlined U.S. policy towards Europe as
explained to him by William Bullitt:
A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, William Bullitt
returned to Paris after a three months' leave in America. Meanwhile, I
have had two conversations with him which enable me to inform you of
his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of
Washington's policy.
The international situation is regarded by official circles as
extremely serious and in constant danger of armed conflict. Those in
authority are of the opinion that if war should break out between
Britain and France on the one hand, and Germany and Italy on the
other, and should Britain and France be defeated, the Germans would
endanger the real interests of the United States on the American
continent. For this reason, one can foresee right from the beginning
the participation of the United States in the war on the side of
France and Britain, naturally some time after the outbreak of the war.
As Ambassador Bullitt expressed it: 'Should war break out we shall
certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall finish
it.'
On 7 March 1939, Ambassador Potocki sent a remarkably lucid and
perceptive report on Roosevelt's foreign policy to his government in
Warsaw. This document was first made public when leading German
newspapers published it in German translation, along with a facsimile
reproduction of the first page of the Polish original, in their
editions of 28 October 1940. The main National Socialist party
newspaper, the Voelkischer Beobachter, published the Ambassador's
report with this observation:
The document itself needs no commentary. We do not know, and it does
not concern us, whether the internal American situation as reported by
the Polish diplomat is correct in every detail. That must be decided
by the American people alone. But in the interest of historical truth
it is important for us to show that the warmongering activities of
American diplomacy, especially in Europe, are once again revealed and
proven by this document. It still remains a secret just who, and for
what motives, have driven American diplomacy to this course. In any
case, the results have been disastrous for both Europe and America.
Europe was plunged into war and America has brought upon itself the
hostility of great nations which normally have no differences with the
American people and, indeed, have not been in conflict but have lived
for generations as friends and want to remain so...
While the Polish documents alone are conclusive proof of Roosevelt's
treacherous campaign to bring about world war, it is fortunate for
posterity that a substantial body of irrefutable complementary
evidence exists which confirms the conspiracy recorded in the
dispatches to Warsaw...
On 19 September 1938 -- that is, a year before the outbreak of war in
Europe-Roosevelt called Lindsay to a very secret meeting at the White
House. At the beginning of their long conversation, according to
Lindsay's confidential dispatch to London, Roosevelt "emphasized the
necessity of absolute secrecy. Nobody must know I had seen him and he
himself would tell nobody of the interview. I gathered not even the
State Department." The two discussed some secondary matters before
Roosevelt got to the main point of the conference. "This is the very
secret part of his communication and it must not be known to anyone
that he has even breathed a suggestion." The President told the
Ambassador that if news of the conversation was ever made public, it
could mean his impeachment. And no wonder. What Roosevelt proposed was
a cynically brazen but harebrained scheme to violate the U.S.
Constitution and dupe the American people.
The President said that if Britain and France "would find themselves
forced to war" against Germany, the United States would ultimately
also join. But this would require some clever maneuvering. Britain and
France should impose a total blockade against Germany without actually
declaring war and force other states (including neutrals) to abide by
it. This would certainly provoke some kind of German military
response, but it would also free Britain and France from having to
actually declare war. For propaganda purposes, the "blockade must be
based on loftiest humanitarian grounds and on the desire to wage
hostilities with minimum of suffering and the least possible loss of
life and property, and yet bring the enemy to his knees." Roosevelt
conceded that this would involve aerial bombardment, but "bombing from
the air was not the method of hostilities which caused really great
loss of life."
The important point was to "call it defensive measures or anything
plausible but avoid actual declaration of war." That way, Roosevelt
believed he could talk the American people into supporting war against
Germany, including shipments of weapons to Britain and France, by
insisting that the United States was still technically neutral in a
non-declared conflict. "This method of conducting war by blockade
would in his [Roosevelt's] opinion meet with approval of the United
States if its humanitarian purpose were strongly emphasized," Lindsay
reported.[19]
The American Ambassador to Italy, William Phillips, admitted in his
postwar memoirs that the Roosevelt administration was already
committed to going to war on the side of Britain and France in late
1938. "On this and many other occasions," Phillips wrote, "I would
like to have told him [Count Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister]
frankly that in the event of a European war, the United States would
undoubtedly be involved on the side of the Allies. But in view of my
official position, I could not properly make such a statement without
instructions from Washington, and these I never received."[20]
The fateful British pledge to Poland of 31 March 1939 to go to war
against Germany in case of a Polish-German conflict would not have
been made without strong pressure from the White House
In their nationally syndicated column of 14 April 1939, the usually
very well informed Washington journalists Drew Pearson and Robert S.
Allen reported that on 16 March 1939 Roosevelt had "sent a virtual
ultimatum to Chamberlain" demanding that henceforth the British
government strongly oppose Germany. According to Pearson and Allen,
who completely supported Roosevelt's move, "the President warned that
Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the
sale of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued."[22] Chamberlain
gave in and the next day, 17 March, ended Britain's policy of
cooperation with Germany in a speech at Birmingham bitterly denouncing
Hitler. Two weeks later the British government formally pledged itself
to war in case of German-Polish hostilities.
In a confidential telegram to Washington dated 9 April 1939, Bullitt
reported from Paris on another conversation with Ambassador
Lukasiewicz. He had told the Polish envoy that although U.S. law
prohibited direct financial aid to Poland, it might be possible to
circumvent its provisions. The Roosevelt administration might be able
to supply war planes to Poland indirectly through Britain. "The Polish
Ambassador asked me if it might not be possible for Poland to obtain
financial help and aeroplanes from the United States. I replied that I
believed the Johnson Act would forbid any loans from the United States
to Poland but added that it might be possible for England to purchase
planes for cash in the United States and turn them over to
Poland."[24]
On 25 April 1939, four months before the outbreak of war, Bullitt
called American newspaper columnist Karl von Wiegand, chief European
correspondent of the International News Service, to the U.S. embassy
in Paris and told him: "War in Europe has been decided upon. Poland
has the assurance of the support of Britain and France, and will yield
to no demands from Germany. America will be in the war soon after
Britain and France enter it."[25]
In a lengthy secret conversation at Hyde Park on 28 May 1939,
Roosevelt assured the former President of Czechoslovakia, Dr. Edvard
Benes, that America would actively intervene on the side of Britain
and France in the anticipated European war.[26]
In June 1939, Roosevelt secretly proposed to the British that the
United States should establish "a patrol over the waters of the
Western Atlantic with a view to denying them to the German Navy in the
event of war." The British Foreign Office record of this offer noted
that "although the proposal was vague and woolly and open to certain
objections, we assented informally as the patrol was to be operated in
our interests."[27]
Many years after the war, Georges Bonnet, the French Foreign Minister
in 1939, confirmed Bullitt's role as Roosevelt's deputy in pushing his
country into war. In a letter to Hamilton Fish dated 26 March 1971,
Bonnet wrote: "One thing is certain is that Bullitt in 1939 did
everything he could to make France enter the war."[28] An important
confirmation of the crucial role of Roosevelt and the Jews in pushing
Britain into war comes from the diary of James V. Forrestal, the first
U.S. Secretary of Defense. In his entry for 27 December 1945, he
wrote:
Played golf today with [former Ambassador] Joe Kennedy. I asked him
about his conversations with Roosevelt and [British Prime Minister]
Neville Chamberlain from 1938 on. He said Chamberlain's position in
1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she
could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy's view: That Hitler
would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it
had not been for [William] Bullitt's urging on Roosevelt in the summer
of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland; neither the
French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had
not been for the constant needling from Washington. Bullitt, he said,
kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn't fight; Kennedy that
they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he says,
stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the
war. In his telephone conversations with Roosevelt in the summer of
1939, the President kept telling him to put some iron up Chamberlain's
backside.[29]
"In the West," the Ambassador told Szembek, "there are all kinds of
elements openly pushing for war: the Jews, the super-capitalists, the
arms dealers. Today they are all ready for a great business, because
they have found a place which can be set on fire: Danzig; and a nation
that is ready to fight: Poland. They want to do business on our backs.
They are indifferent to the destruction of our country. Indeed, since
everything will have to be rebuilt later on, they can profit from that
as well."[30]
On 24 August 1939, just a week before the outbreak of hostilities,
Chamberlain's closest advisor, Sir Horace Wilson, went to Ambassador
Kennedy with an urgent appeal from the British Prime Minister for
President Roosevelt. Regretting that Britain had unequivocally
obligated itself in March to Poland in case of war, Chamberlain now
turned in despair to Roosevelt as a last hope for peace. He wanted the
American President to "put pressure on the Poles" to change course at
this late hour and open negotiations with Germany. By telephone
Kennedy told the State Department that the British "felt that they
could not, given their obligations, do anything of this sort but that
we could." Presented with this extraordinary opportunity to possibly
save the peace of Europe, Roosevelt rejected Chamberlain's desperate
plea out of hand. At that, Kennedy reported, the Prime Minister lost
all hope. "The futility of it all," Chamberlain had told Kennedy, "is
the thing that is frightful. After all, we cannot save the Poles. We
can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of
all Europe."[31]
But Roosevelt rejected out of hand this chance to save the peace of
Europe. To a close political crony, he called Kennedy's plea "the
silliest message to me that I have ever received." He complained to
Henry Morgenthau that his London Ambassador was nothing but a pain in
the neck: "Joe has been an appeaser and will always be an appeaser ...
If Germany and Italy made a good peace offer tomorrow, Joe would start
working on the King and his friend the Queen and from there on down to
get everybody to accept it."[33]
Infuriated at Kennedy's stubborn efforts to restore peace in Europe or
at least limit the conflict that had broken out, Roosevelt instructed
his Ambassador with a "personal" and "strictly confidential" telegram
on 11 September 1939 that any American peace effort was totally out of
the question. The Roosevelt government, it declared, "sees no
opportunity nor occasion for any peace move to be initiated by the
President of the United States. The people [sic] of the United States
would not support any move for peace initiated by this Government that
would consolidate or make possible a survival of a regime of force and
aggression."[34]
In the months before armed conflict broke out in Europe, perhaps the
most vigorous and prophetic American voice of warning against
President Roosevelt's campaign to incite war was that of Hamilton
Fish, a leading Republican congressman from New York. In a series of
hard-hitting radio speeches, Fish rallied considerable public opinion
against Roosevelt's deceptive war policy. Here are only a few excerpts
from some of those addresses.[35]
On 6 January 1939, Fish told a nationwide radio audience:
The inflammatory and provocative message of the President to Congress
and the world [given two days before] has unnecessarily alarmed the
American people and created, together with a barrage of propaganda
emanating from high New Deal officials, a war hysteria, dangerous to
the peace of America and the world. The only logical conclusion to
such speeches is another war fought overseas by American soldiers.
All the totalitarian nations referred to by President Roosevelt ...
haven't the faintest thought of making war on us or invading Latin
America.
I do not propose to mince words on such an issue, affecting the life,
liberty and happiness of our people. The time has come to call a halt
to the warmongers of the New Deal, backed by war profiteers,
Communists, and hysterical internationalists, who want us to
quarantine the world with American blood and money.
He [Roosevelt] evidently desires to whip up a frenzy of hate and war
psychosis as a red herring to take the minds of our people off their
own unsolved domestic problems. He visualizes hobgoblins and creates
in the public mind a fear of foreign invasions that exists only in his
own imagination.
On 5 March, Fish spoke to the country over the Columbia radio network:
The people of France and Great Britain want peace but our warmongers
are constantly inciting them to disregard the Munich Pact and resort
to the arbitrament of arms. If only we would stop meddling in foreign
lands the old nations of Europe would compose their own quarrels by
arbitration and the processes of peace, but apparently we won't let
them.
Fish addressed the listeners of the National Broadcasting Company
network on 5 April with these words:
The youth of America are again being prepared for another blood bath
in Europe in order to make the world safe for democracy.
If Hitler and the Nazi government regain Memel or Danzig, taken away
from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and where the population is 90
percent German, why is it necessary to issue threats and denunciations
and incite our people to war? I would not sacrifice the life of one
American soldier for a half dozen Memels or Danzigs. We repudiated the
Versailles Treaty because it was based on greed and hatred, and as
long as its inequalities and injustices exist there are bound to be
wars of liberation.
The sooner certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty are scrapped
the better for the peace of the world.
I believe that if the areas that are distinctly German in population
are restored to Germany, except Alsace-Lorraine and the Tyrol, there
will be no war in western Europe. There may be a war between the Nazis
and the Communists, but if there is that is not our war or that of
Great Britain or France or any of the democracies.
New Deal spokesmen have stirred up war hysteria into a veritable
frenzy. The New Deal propaganda machine is working overtime to prepare
the minds of our people for war, who are already suffering from a bad
case of war jitters.
President Roosevelt is the number one warmonger in America, and is
largely responsible for the fear that pervades the Nation which has
given the stock market and the American people a bad case of the
jitters.
I accuse the administration of instigating war propaganda and hysteria
to cover up the failure and collapse of the New Deal policies, with 12
million unemployed and business confidence destroyed.
I believe we have far more to fear from our enemies from within than
we have from without. All the Communists are united in urging us to go
to war against Germany and Japan for the benefit of Soviet Russia.
Great Britain still expects every American to do her duty, by
preserving the British Empire and her colonies. The war profiteers,
munitions makers and international bankers are all set up for our
participation in a new world war.
On 21 April, Fish again spoke to the country over nationwide radio:
It is the duty of all those Americans who desire to keep out of
foreign entanglements and the rotten mess and war madness of Europe
and Asia to openly expose the war hysteria and propaganda that is
impelling us to armed conflict.
What we need in America is a stop war crusade, before we are forced
into a foreign war by internationalists and interventionists at
Washington, who seem to be more interested in solving world problems
rather than our own.
In his radio address of 26 May, Fish stated:
He [Roosevelt] should remember that the Congress has the sole power to
declare war and formulate the foreign policies of the United States.
The President has no such constitutional power. He is merely the
official organ to carry out the policies determined by the Congress.
Without knowing even who the combatants will be, we are informed
almost daily by the internationalists and interventionists in America
that we must participate in the next world war.
On 8 July 1939, Fish declared over the National Broadcasting Company
radio network:
If we must go to war, let it be in defense of America, but not in
defense of the munitions makers, war profiteers, Communists, to cover
up the failures of the New Deal, or to provide an alibi for a third
term.
It is well for all nations to know that we do not propose to go to war
over Danzig, power politics, foreign colonies, or the imperialistic
wars of Europe or anywhere in the world.
President Roosevelt could have done little to incite war in Europe
without help from powerful allies. Behind him stood the self-serving
international financial and Jewish interests bent on the destruction
of Germany. The principal organization which drummed up public support
for U.S. involvement in the European war prior to the Pearl Harbor
attack was the cleverly named "Committee to Defend America by Aiding
the Allies." President Roosevelt himself initiated its founding, and
top administration officials consulted frequently with Committee
leaders.[36]
Although headed for a time by an elderly small-town Kansas newspaper
publisher, William Allen White, the Committee was actually organized
by powerful financial interests which stood to profit tremendously
from loans to embattled Britain and from shrewd investments in giant
war industries in the United States.
At the end of 1940, West Virginia Senator Rush D. Holt issued a
detailed examination of the Committee which exposed the base interests
behind the idealistic-sounding slogans:
The Committee has powerful connections with banks, insurance
companies, financial investing firms, and industrial concerns. These
in turn exert influence on college presidents and professors, as well
as on newspapers, radio and other means of communication. One of the
powerful influences used by the group is the '400' and social set. The
story is a sordid picture of betrayal of public interest.
The powerful J.P. Morgan interest with its holdings in the British
Empire helped plan the organization and donated its first expense
money.
Some of the important figures active in the Committee were revealed by
Holt: Frederic R. Coudert, a paid war propagandist for the British
government in the U.S. during the First World War; Robert S. Allen of
the Pearson and Allen syndicated column; Henry R. Luce, the
influential publisher of Time, Life, and Fortune magazines; Fiorella
LaGuardia, the fiery half-Jewish Mayor of Now York City; Herbert
Lehman, the Jewish Governor of New York with important financial
holdings in war industries; and Frank Altschul, an officer in the
Jewish investment firm of Lazard Freres with extensive holdings in
munitions and military supply companies.
If the Committee succeeded in getting the U.S. into war, Holt warned,
"American boys will spill their blood for profiteers, politicians and
'paytriots.' If war comes, on the hands of the sponsors of the White
Committee will be blood-the blood of Americans killed in a needless
war."[37]
In March 1941 a list of most of the Committee's financial backers was
made public. It revealed the nature of the forces eager to bring
America into the European war. Powerful international banking
interests were well represented. J.P. Morgan, John W. Morgan, Thomas
W. Lamont and others of the great Morgan banking house were listed.
Other important names from the New York financial world included Mr.
and Mrs. Paul Mellon, Felix M. and James F. Warburg, and J. Malcolm
Forbes. Chicago department store owner and publisher Marshall Field
was a contributor, as was William Averill Harriman, the railroad and
investment millionaire who later served as Roosevelt's ambassador in
Moscow.
Of course, Jewish names made up a substantial portion of the long
list. Hollywood film czar Samuel Goldwyn of Goldwyn Studios was there,
along with David Dubinsky, the head of the International Ladies
Garment Workers Union. The William S. Paley Foundation, which had been
set up by the head of the giant Columbia Broadcasting System,
contributed to the Committee. The name of Mrs. Herbert H. Lehman, wife
of the New York Governor, was also on the list.[38]
Without an understanding of his intimate ties to organized Jewry,
Roosevelt's policies make little sense. As Jewish historian Lucy
Dawidowicz noted: "Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle
more Jews than any other President before or after him. Felix
Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau were his close
advisers. Benjamin V. Cohen, Samuel Rosenman and David K. Niles were
his friends and trusted aides."[39] This is perhaps not so remarkable
in light of Roosevelt's reportedly one-eighth Jewish ancestry.[40]
In his diary entry of 1 May 1941, Charles A. Lindbergh, the American
aviator hero and peace leader, nailed the coalition that was pushing
the United States into war:
The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to
it, but the Administration seems to have 'the bit in its teeth' and
[is] hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the
country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and
radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the
'intellectuals,' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British agents who are
allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many
others.[41]
Joseph Kennedy shared Lindbergh's apprehensions about Jewish power.
Before the outbreak of war he privately expressed concerns about "the
Jews who dominate our press" and world Jewry in general, which he
considered a threat to peace and prosperity. Shortly after the
beginning of hostilities, Kennedy lamented "the growing Jewish
influence in the press and in Washington demanding continuance of the
war "[42]
Roosevelt's efforts to get Poland, Britain and France into war against
Germany succeeded all too well. The result was untold death and misery
and destruction. When the fighting began, as Roosevelt had intended
and planned, the Polish and French leaders expected the American
president to at least make good on his assurances of backing in case
of war. But Roosevelt had not reckoned on the depth of peace sentiment
of the vast majority of Americans. So, in addition to deceiving his
own people, Roosevelt also let down those in Europe to whom he had
promised support.
Seldom in American history were the people as united in their views as
they were in late 1939 about staying out of war in Europe. When
hostilities began in September 1939, the Gallup poll showed 94 percent
of the American people against involvement in war. That figure rose to
96.5 percent in December before it began to decline slowly to about 80
percent in the Fall of 1941. (Today, there is hardly an issue that
even 60 or 70 percent of the people agree upon.)[43]
Roosevelt was, of course, quite aware of the intensity of popular
feeling on this issue. That is why he lied repeatedly to the American
people about his love of peace and his determination to keep the U.S.
out of war, while simultaneously doing everything in his power to
plunge Europe and America into war.
In a major 1940 re-election campaign speech, Roosevelt responded to
the growing fears of millions of Americans who suspected that their
President had secretly pledged United States support to Britain in its
war against Germany. These well-founded suspicions were based in part
on the publication in March of the captured Polish documents. The
speech of 23 October 1940 was broadcast from Philadelphia to the
nation on network radio. In the most emphatic language possible,
Roosevelt categorically denied that he had
pledged in some way the participation of the United States in some
foreign war. I give to you and to the people of this country this most
solemn assurance: There is no secret Treaty, no secret understanding
in any shape or form, direct or indirect, with any Government or any
other nation in any part of the world, to involve this nation in any
war or for any other purpose.[44]
We now know, of course, that this pious declaration was just another
one of Roosevelt's many brazen, bald-faced lies to the American
people.
Roosevelt's policies were more than just dishonest-they were criminal.
The Constitution of the United States grants authority only to the
Congress to make war and peace. And Congress had passed several major
laws to specifically insure U.S. neutrality in case of war in Europe.
Roosevelt continually violated his oath as President to uphold the
Constitution. If his secret policies had been known, the public demand
for his impeachment would very probably have been unstoppable.
The Watergate episode has made many Americans deeply conscious of the
fact that their presidents can act criminally. That affair forced
Richard Nixon to resign his presidency, and he is still widely
regarded as a criminal. No schools are named after him and his name
will never receive the respect that normally goes to every American
president. But Nixon's crimes pale into insignificance when compared
to those of Franklin Roosevelt. What were Nixon's lies compared to
those of Roosevelt? What is a burglary cover-up compared to an illegal
and secret campaign to bring about a major war?
Those who defend Roosevelt's record argue that he lied to the American
people for their own good-that he broke the law for lofty principles.
His deceit is considered permissible because the cause was noble,
while similar deception by presidents Johnson and Nixon, to name two,
is not. This is, of course, a hypocritical double standard. And the
argument doesn't speak very well for the democratic system. It implies
that the people are too dumb to understand their own best interests.
It further suggests that the best form of government is a kind of
benevolent liberal-democratic dictatorship.
Roosevelt's hatred for Hitler was deep, vehement, passionate-almost
personal. This was due in no small part to an abiding envy and
jealousy rooted in the great contrast between the two men, not only in
their personal characters but also in their records as national
leaders.
Superficially, the public fives of Roosevelt and Hitler were
astonishingly similar. Both assumed the leadership of their respective
countries at the beginning of 1933. They both faced the enormous
challenge of mass unemployment during a catastrophic worldwide
economic depression. Each became a powerful leader in a vast military
alliance during the most destructive war in history. Both men died
while still in office within a few weeks of each other in April 1945,
just before the end of the Second World War in Europe. But the
enormous contrasts in the lives of these two men are even more
remarkable.
Roosevelt was born into one of the wealthiest families in America. His
was a life utterly free of material worry. He took part in the First
World War from an office in Washington as UnderSecretary of the Navy.
Hitler, on the other hand, was born into a modest provinicial family.
As a young man he worked as an impoverished manual laborer. He served
in the First World War as a front line soldier in the hell of the
Western battleground. He was wounded many times and decorated for
bravery.
In spite of his charming manner and soothing rhetoric, Roosevelt
proved unable to master the great challenges facing America. Even
after four years of his presidency, millions remained unemployed,
undernourished and poorly housed in a vast land richly endowed with
all the resources for incomparable prosperity. The New Deal was
plagued with bitter strikes and bloody clashes between labor and
capital. Roosevelt did nothing to solve the country's deep, festering
racial problems which erupted repeatedly in riots and armed conflict.
The story was very different in Germany. Hitler rallied his people
behind a radical program that transformed Germany within a few years
from an economically ruined land on the edge of civil war into
Europe's powerhouse. Germany underwent a social, cultural and economic
rebirth without parallel in history. The contrast between the
personalities of Roosevelt and Hitler was simultaneously a contrast
between two diametrically different social-political systems and
ideologies.
And yet, it would be incorrect to characterize Roosevelt as merely a
cynical politician and front man for powerful alien interests.
Certainly he did not regard himself as an evil man. He sincerely
believed that he was doing the right and noble thing in pressuring
Britain and France into war against Germany. Like Wilson before him,
and others since, Roosevelt felt himself uniquely qualified and called
upon by destiny to reshape the world according to his vision of an
egalitarian, universalist democracy. He was convinced, as so many
American leaders have been, that the world could be saved from itself
by remodeling it after the United States.
Presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt view the world not as a complex
of different nations, races and cultures which must mutually respect
each others' separate collective identities in order to live together
in peace, but rather according to a selfrighteous missionary
perspective that divides the globe into morally good and evil
countries. In that scheme of things, America is the providentially
permanent leader of the forces of righteousness. Luckily, this view
just happens to correspond to the economic and political interests of
those who wield power in the United States.
President Roosevelt's War
In April 1941, Senator Gerald Nye of North Dakota prophetically
predicted that one day the Second World War would be remembered as
Roosevelt's war. "If we are ever involved in this war, it will be
called by future historians by only one title, 'the President's War,'
because every step of his since his Chicago quarantine speech [of 5
October 1937] has been toward war.[45]
The great American historian, Harry Elmer Barnes, believed that war
could probably have been prevented in 1939 if it had not been for
Roosevelt's meddling. "Indeed, there is fairly conclusive evidence
that, but for Mr. Roosevelt's pressure on Britain, France and Poland,
and his commitments to them before September 1939, especially to
Britain, and the irresponsible antics of his agent provocateur,
William C. Bullitt, there would probably have been no world war in
1939, or, perhaps, for many years thereafter."[46] In Revisionism: A
Key to Peace, Barnes wrote:
President Roosevelt had a major responsibility, both direct and
indirect, for the outbreak of war in Europe. He began to exert
pressure on France to stand up to Hitler as early as the German
reoccupation of the Rhineland in March 1936, months before he was
making his strongly isolationist speeches in the campaign of 1936.
This pressure on France, and also England, continued right down to the
coming of the war in September 1939. It gained volume and momentum
after the quarantine speech of October 1937. As the crisis approached
between Munich and the outbreak of war, Roosevelt pressed the Poles to
stand firm against any demands by Germany, and urged the English and
French to back up the Poles unflinchingly.
There is grave doubt that England would have gone to war in September
1939 had it not been for Roosevelt's encouragement and his assurances
that, in the event of war, the United States would enter on the side
of Britain just as soon as he could swing American public opinion
around to support intervention.
Roosevelt had abandoned all semblance of neutrality, even before war
broke out in 1939, and moved as speedily as was safe and feasible in
the face of anti-interventionist American public opinion to involve
this country in the European conflict.[47]
One of the most perceptive verdicts on Franklin Roosevelt's place in
history came from the pen of the great Swedish explorer and author,
Sven Hedin. During the war he wrote:
The question of the way it came to a new world war is not only to be
explained because of the foundation laid by the peace treaties of
1919, or in the suppression of Germany and her allies after the First
World War, or in the continuation of the ancient policies of Great
Britain and France. The decisive push came from the other side of the
Atlantic Ocean.
Roosevelt speaks of democracy and destroys it incessantly. He slanders
as undemocratic and un-American those who admonish him in the name of
peace and the preservation of the American way of life. He has made
democracy into a caricature rather than a model. He talks about
freedom of speech and silences those who don't hold his opinion.
He talks about freedom of religion and makes an alliance with
Bolshevism.
He talks about freedom from want, but cannot provide ten million of
his own people with work, bread or shelter. He talks about freedom
from the fear of war while working for war, not only for his own
people but for the world, by inciting his country against the Axis
powers when it might have united with them, and he thereby drove
millions to their deaths.
This war will go down in history as the war of President
Roosevelt.[48]
Officially orchestrated praise for Roosevelt as a great man of peace
cannot conceal forever his crucial role in pushing Europe into war in
1939.
It is now more than forty years since the events described here took
place. For many they are an irrelevant part of a best-forgotten past.
But the story of how Franklin Roosevelt engineered war in Europe is
very pertinent-particularly for Americans today. The lessons of the
past have never been more important than in this nuclear age. For
unless at least an aware minority understands how and why wars are
made, we will remain powerless to restrain the warmongers of our own
era.
Notes
1. See, for example: Charles A. Beard, President Roosevelt and
the Coming of the War 1941 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948);
William Henry Chamberlin, America's Second Crusade (Chicago: Regnery,
1952, 1962); Benjamin Colby, 'Twas a Famous Victory (New Rochelle,
N.Y.: Arlington House, 1979); Frederic R. Sanborn, Design for War (New
York: Devin-Adair, 1951); William Stevenson, A Man Called Intrepid
(New York: Ballantine Books, 1980); Charles C. Tansill, Back Door to
War (Chicago: Regnery, 1952); John Toland, Infamy: Pearl Harbor and
Its Aftermath (New York: Doubleday, 1982).
2. Saul Friedlander, Prelude to Downfall: Hitler and the United
States 1939-1941 (New York: Knopf, 1967), pp. 73-77; U.S., Congress,
House, Special Committee on Investigation of Un-American Activities in
the United States, 1940, Appendix, Part II, pp. 1054-1059.
3. Friedlander, pp. 75-76.
4. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1.
5. Ibid., p. 4, and 31 March 1940, p. 1.
6. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1. Baltimore Sun, 30 March
1940, p. 1.
7. A French-language edition was published in 1944 under the
title Comment Roosevelt est Entre en Guerre.
8. Tansill, "The United States and the Road to War in Europe," in
Harry Elmer Barnes (ed.), Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace (Caldwell,
Idaho: Caxton, 1953; reprint eds., New York: Greenwood, 1969 and
Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review [supplemented],
1982), p. 184 (note 292). Tansill also quoted from several of the
documents in his Back Door to War, pp. 450-51.
9. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Court Historians Versus Revisionism
(N.p.: privately printed, 1952), p. 10. This booklet is reprinted in
Barnes, Selected Revisionist Pamphlets (New York: Arno Press & The New
York Times, 1972), and in Barnes, The Barnes Trilogy (Torrance,
Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1979).
10. Chamberlin, p. 60.
11. Edward Raczynski, In Allied London (London: Weidenfeld and
Nicolson, 1963), p. 51.
12. Orville H. Bullitt (ad.), For the President: Personal and
Secret (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972), p. x1v [biographical
foreword]. See also Time, 26 October 1936, p. 24.
13. Current Biography 1940, ed. Maxine Block (New York: H.W.
Wilson, 1940), p. 122 ff.
14. Gisleher Wirsing, Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um
die Weltherrschaft (Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942), p. 224.
15. Bullitt obituary in New York Times, 16 February 1967, p. 44.
16. Jack Alexander, "He Rose From the Rich," Saturday Evening
Post, 11 March 1939, p. 6. (Also see continuation in issue of 18 March
1939.) Bullitt's public views on the European scene and what should be
America's attitude toward it can be found in his Report to the
American People (Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Cambridge: Riverside
Press], 1940), the text of a speech he delivered, with the President's
blessing, under the auspices of the American Philosophical Society in
Independence Hall in Philadelphia shortly after the fall of France.
For sheer, hyperventilated stridency and emotionalist hysterics, this
anti-German polemic could hardly be topped, even given the similar
propensities of many other interventionists in government and the
press in those days.
17. Michael R. Beschloss, Kennedy and Roosevelt (New York: Norton,
1980), pp. 203-04.
18. Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign
Policy 1932-1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 31. See
also pp. 164-65.
19. Dispatch No. 349 of 20 September 1938 by Sir. R. Lindsay,
Documents on British Foreign Policy (ed. Ernest L. Woodward), Third
series, Vol. VII (London, 1954), pp. 627-29. See also: Joseph P. Lash,
Roosevelt and Churchill 1939-1941 (New York: Norton, 1976), pp. 25-27;
Dallek, pp. 164-65; Arnold A. Offner, America and the Ori-, gins of
World War II (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971), p. 61.
20. William Phillips, Ventures in Diplomacy (North Beverly, Mass.:
privately published, 1952), pp. 220-21.
21. Carl Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939 (Munich:
Callwey, 1960), p. 225.
22. Drew Pearson and Robert S. Allen, "Washington Daily
Merry-Go-Round," Washington Times-Herald, 14 April 1939, p. 16. A
facsimile reprint of this column appears in Conrad Grieb (ed.),
American Manifest Destiny and The Holocausts (New York: Examiner
Books, 1979), pp. 132-33. See also: Wirsing, pp. 238-41.
23. Jay P. Moffat, The Moffat Papers 1919-1943 (Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1956), p. 232.
24. U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United
States (Diplomatic Papers), 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956),
p. 122.
25. "Von Wiegand Says-," Chicago Herald-American, 8 October 1944,
p. 2.
26. Edvard Benes, Memoirs of Dr. Eduard Benes (London: George
Allen & Unwin, 1954), pp. 79-80.
27. Lash, p. 64.
28. Hamilton Fish, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin (Now York:
Vantage, 1976; Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review,
1980), p. 62.
29. James V. Forrestal (ads. Walter Millis and E.S. Duffield), The
Forrestal Diaries (New York: Viking, 1951), pp. 121-22. I have been
privately informed by a colleague who has examined the original
manuscript of the Forrestal diaries that many very critical references
to the Jews were deleted from the published version.
30. Jan Szembek, Journal 1933-1939 (Paris: Plan, 1952), pp.
475-76.
31. David E. Koskoff, Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times
(Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974), p. 207; Moffat, p. 253;
A.J.P. Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War (London: Hamish
Hamilton, 1961; 2nd ed. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Premier [paperback],
1965), p. 262; U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the
United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956), p. 355.
32. Dallek, p. 164.
33. Beschloss, pp. 190-91; Lash, p. 75; Koskoff, pp. 212-13.
34. Hull to Kennedy (No. 905), U.S., Department of State, Foreign
Relations of the United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington:
1956), p. 424.
35. The radio addresses of Hamilton Fish quoted here were
published in the Congressional Record Appendix (Washington) as
follows: (6 January 1939) Vol. 84, Part 11, pp. 52-53; (5 March 1939)
same, pp. 846-47; (5 April 1939) Vol. 84, Part 12, pp. 1342-43; (21
April 1939) same, pp. 1642-43; (26 May 1939) Vol. 84, Part 13, pp.
2288-89; (8 July 1939) same, pp. 3127-28.
36. Wayne S. Cole, Charles A. Lindbergh and the Battle Against
American Intervention in World War II (New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, 1974), pp. 128, 136-39.
37. Congressional Record Appendix (Washington: 1941), (30 December
1940) Vol. 86, Part 18, pp. 7019-25. See also: Appendix, Vol. 86, Part
17, pp. 5808-14.
38. New York Times, 11 March 1941, p. 10.
39. Lucy Dawidowicz, "American Jews and the Holocaust," The New
York Times Magazine, 18 April 1982, p. 102.
40. "FDR 'had a Jewish great-grandmother'" Jewish Chronicle
(London), 5 February 1982, p. 3.
41. Charles A. Lindbergh, The Wartime Journals of Charles A.
Lindbergh (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970), p. 481.
42. Koskoff, pp. 282, 212. The role of the American press in
fomenting hatred against Germany between 1933 and 1939 is a subject
that deserves much more detailed treatment. Charles Tansill provides
some useful information on this in Back Door to War. The essay by
Professor Hans A. Muenster, "Die Kriegsschuld der Presse der USA" in
Kriegsschuld und Presse, published in 1944 by the German
Reichsdozentenfuehrung, is worth consulting.
43. An excellent essay relating and contrasting American public
opinion measurements to Roosevelt's foreign policy moves in 1939-41 is
Harry Elmer Barnes, Was Roosevelt Pushed Into War By Popular Demand in
1941? (N.p.: privately printed, 1951). It is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
44. Lash, p. 240.
45. New York Times, 27 April 1941, p. 19.
46. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Struggle Against the Historical
Blackout, 2nd ed. (N.p.: privately published, ca. 1948), p. 12. See
also the 9th, final revised and enlarged edition (N.p.: privately
published, ca. 1954), p. 34; this booklet is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
47. Harry Elmer Barnes, "Revisionism: A Key to Peace," Rampart
Journal of Individualist Thought Vol. II, No. 1 (Spring 1966), pp.
29-30. This article was republished in Barnes, Revisionism: A Key to
Peace and Other Essays (San Francisco: Cato Institute [Cato Paper No.
12], 1980).
48. Sven Hedin, Amerika im Kampf der Kontinente (Leipzig: F.A.
Brockhaus, 1943), p. 54.
Bibliography
Listed here are the published editions of the Polish documents, the
most important sources touching on the questions of their authenticity
and content, and essential recent sources on what President Roosevelt
was really-as opposed to publicly-doing and thinking during the
prelude to war. Full citations for all references in the article will
be found in the notes.
Beschloss, Michael R. Kennedy and Roosevelt. New York: Norton, 1980.
Bullitt, Orville H. (ed.). For the President: Personal and Secret.
[Correspondence between Franklin D. Roosevelt and William C. Bullitt.]
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Germany. Foreign Office Archive Commission. Roosevelts Weg in den
Krieg: Geheimdokumente zur Kriegspolitik des Praesidenten der
Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag, 1943.
Germany. Foreign Office. The German White Paper. [White Book No. 3.]
New York: Howell, Soskin and Co., 1940.
Germany. Foreign Office. Polnische Dokumente zur Vorgeschichte des
Kriegs. [White Book No. 3.] Berlin: F. Eher, 1940.
Koskoff, David E. Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
Lukasiewicz, Juliusz (Waclaw Jedrzejewicz, ed.). Diplomat in Paris
1936-1939. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Wirsing, Giselher. Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um die
Weltherrschaft. Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942.
>
>"Floriday", not "florida". America didn't lose Florida in a war.
>
>
>We're in the middle of a war with terrorists, Topie. I wouldn't go
>around looking like a foreign or domestic terrorist if I were you.
Who can say "We" when referring to America? Definately the Jews.
Maybe women and minorities. Certainly not a White man.
>
>How'd that work out for old Adolf? It turned out that it *did* make a
>difference who was responsible. Heh.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
Topaz
The Jewish Agenda
By Phaedrus
Here's what they're up to:
The progressive elimination of all national borders world-wide.
Elimination of foreign currency exchange controls world-wide to aid
unimpeded capital flight.
The imposition of the preferred Jewish method of control - so called
'democracy' - around the world then engineering the installation of
compliant governments who are nothing more than puppets of Zionist
control.
Total control of television, radio, newspapers, periodicals, magazines
and advertising.
The promotion of inter-breeding between disparate races through
pervasive media suggestion and political dogma.
The encouragement of unsustainable levels of immigration in Europe and
the United States, whether legal or not and regardless of the worth of
the immigrants involved or their likely contribution to Western
economies.
Direct control of international finance and banking.
The formation of ever-larger eco-political blocs and free-trade
regions with uniform rules and standards that will one day all be
merged to form the One World Government, which they of course will
control.
The propagation of the mind virus that 'political correctness' is the
enlightened, modern way to go and its rejectionists as in some way
wicked and bigoted or at the very least woefully old-fashioned.
The crushing of any form of dissent against the implementation of the
New World Order.
Stricter gun control measures in the United States with the aim of
eventually disarming the people altogether.
The promotion via their media holdings of homosexuality, mixed-race
relationships and any other forms of aberrant and socially damaging
behavior.
Engendering the idea through media control that blacks are superior to
what they really are and that whites are in fact, inferior to what
they really are.
The idea that homosexuals and lesbians should be proud of what they
are and AIDS is nothing to be ashamed of any more.
The restriction of free expression on the Internet.
The propagation of the concept of 'Hate Crime' - reminiscent of George
Orwell's 'Thought Crime' in his prescient, dystopian novel, Nineteen
Eighty-Four.
The encouragement of under-age sex preferably between children of
different races through their numerous teenage magazine titles (theft
of childhood and innocence).
Elimination of trade barriers and the creation of a global,
business-friendly trading environment giving rise to massive job
losses in Europe and America.
The debasement of traditional family values and the destruction of the
family unit.
To ridicule and debase Christianity and anyone who dares uphold moral
values.
To campaign for the intolerance of 'racism' and 'homophobia.'
The promotion of "Affirmative Action" type programs that put the
interests of hopelessly incompetent blacks ahead of struggling, hard
working white people.
The stimulation of inter-tribal violence between Arabs.
The generation of inter-cultural tensions in countries that have
adopted Jew-promoted 'multiculturalism.'
The expansion of a 'Greater Israel' into what remains of Palestine.
And we allow these poisonous rodents to shape our perceptions for us??
We MUST be mad. In the future, after the forthcoming struggle is won,
no Jew must ever be allowed within a million miles of a transmitter or
a printing press - NEVER - for as long as mankind survives.
http://worldpeace-phaedrus.blogspot.com/2007/12/that-jewish-agenda-in-full.html
Topaz
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
Michael Ejercito
> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> Otto Dietrich
>
> The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
> immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
> soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> The Jewish Agenda
The Nazi Agenda
Wait for welfare check to buy meth and kiddie porn.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
>
Topaz
From a German pamphlet:
Do you remember the state of Germany and the German people in the days
before the aged Reich President von Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler and
his party as the last hope of saving Germany from certain political,
Topaz
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
Topaz
by VNN Staff
revised December 2005
Introduction
The text below shows that Jews may well have influenced Western
culture more than any other ethnic group, particularly over the last
few hundred years. It is important to note that our writers allege no
'conspiracy' by Jews. Rather, the examples cited point to an inborn
tendency of Jews to engage in behavior they believe will ensure their
group's safety, no matter its effect on the gentiles they live among.
To be sure, the Jews -- a race and also a religion -- have a long
history. But we will focus here on the past 200 years. We begin their
saga with the rise of the Rothschild banking family in Europe.
The Rise of the Rothschilds and International Banking
Of significance in Jewish history is how important the Rothschilds --
and other Jewish bankers -- were to the solidification of Jewish power
in the West. A large percentage of banks in the West was originally
founded by Jews, e.g. the Rothschilds, Jacob Schiff, and Paul and Max
Warburg. In fact, Meyer Amschel Rothschild and his sons virtually
invented modernized banking and finance. Not only did the powerful
Rothschilds control banking in Europe from approximately 1815 onward,
but they also purchased European news outlets -- including the Reuters
news agency -- giving them the power to influence the opinions of
millions of gentiles. Furthermore, political and social-reform actions
naturally require money; since they were far wealthier than even royal
families -- who were in fact indebted to them -- the Rothschilds were
in a unique position to be able to transform aspects of European
society to benefit the Jewish community.
Two features remain key to the power of the international bankers.
First, many bankers are related by marriage. By the end of the 1800s
many Rothschild cousins had married. Second, many top politicians in
the West have been indebted to the international bankers for providing
them with loans at critical times, such as when a Rothschild loaned
fellow Jew and Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli millions of pounds so
he could buy shares of stock for control of the Suez Canal area to
benefit England.
Perhaps nowhere have Jewish international bankers had a bigger impact
than in funding wars. For example, they funded the Japanese in the
Japan/Russia war of the early 20th century, which has been described
as the first war in which non-Whites defeated White men. Many Western
political observers assert that wars are waged for economic reasons,
and if that is true, then Jews, by their domination of international
banking, have been vital but unseen players in modern warfare.
The Founding of Communism
The ideology that would murder and enslave more people than any other
idea in human history was crafted in the 1840s by a German Jew named
Karl Marx. Like many Jews who wanted to hide within gentile society,
Marx's family converted to Christianity. Marx's ideology was called
communism, a social and economic system in which the government
controlled all forms of property and wealth. Marx based his communism
on the historic kahal, a Jewish communal living system. The kahal was
essentially an early form of communism, with community needs such as
food, living arrangements, and vocations allocated in a collective
manner.
Furthermore, the Soviet Union - which spread communism across the
earth - would likely have never been created if the part-Jewish
leftist V. I. Lenin (see elsewhere) had not been heavily influenced by
Marx's book Das Kapital. In fact, Das Kapital can be credited as
having transformed the young Lenin into a full-blown revolutionary -
another Jewish root of communism.
It should be noted by the reader that communism is, as an ideology,
more severe than Nazism, its sworn enemy. As an example, in Nazi
Germany a citizen could own a gun with a permit. But no citizen could,
or can, own a gun in any communist country. Nazism wasn't
totalitarian. It was politically authoritarian. But communism is
totalitarian in that every aspect of a citizen's life is rigidly
controlled. The number of people murdered by communism worldwide since
1917 approaches 100 million people - 20 million in Russia alone, by
conservative estimate. That number does not include the other millions
of people who were imprisoned, tortured or forced to flee their homes
due to communist aggression in Eastern Europe.
The Rise of Zionism
In the late 1880s, Jews began looking for a permanent place to evade
gentiles irritated by their behavior. The place they envisioned for
their exile was Palestine, portions of which Jews claimed they had
occupied over 2,000 years ago. Jews began a global campaign to
convince the world that they were entitled to 'return' to Palestine.
The leader of this so-called Zionist movement was Theodor Herzl.
Zionism provided the motive for a number of Jewish actions over the
course of the twentieth century, including the manipulations leading
up to the Balfour Declaration (covered below) and the exaggeration of
the severity of the so-called Holocaust. The state of Israel was
brought into being by Jewish terrorism, characterized by such acts as
the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946 and the Deir Yassin
massacre in 1948.
To date, Zionism -- which the UN described as a form of racism in its
1975 Resolution 3379 -- has caused much trouble in the world, through
continual violence in the so-called Middle East involving Israel.
American (read: gentile) tax dollars fund the state of Israel to the
tune of billions a year, which is one of the chief causes of Arab
anger towards the U.S.
The Creation of the Federal Reserve Corporation
In 1913, the U.S. Congress authorized the creation of the Federal
Reserve banking system, which is also known as the Federal Reserve
Corporation. This private, non-governmental entity issues America's
money. The Federal Reserve pays the U.S. Treasury a small fee to print
'Federal Reserve Note' currency, which is later loaned to the U.S.
government.
The Federal Reserve system was created largely by the actions of
Jewish banker Paul M. Warburg. It is debt money because when the U.S.
government needs money -- i.e., more money than the U.S. treasury
receives from taxes -- it borrows the cash from the Federal Reserve
(such borrowing is now routine). The government then agrees to pay
back the money that it borrowed from the corporation with added
interest paid on the collateral for the loan (the collateral being
interest-bearing government bonds). That interest -- minus smaller
government debts such as foreign aid -- is the national, or federal,
debt, or, what America owes the Federal Reserve Corporation.
The Federal Reserve also controls interest rates and the amount of
money that circulates within America, giving it enormous power over
the U.S. economy.
As the debt money system continues to be used, America's national debt
climbs, leading to the American citizen being progressively over-taxed
through the silent theft of inflation.
Of significance is that the leadership of the Federal Reserve and the
key owners of the corporation's stock -- i.e., banks -- have been
disproportionately Jewish. Even today, a Jew named Alan Greenspan
heads that corporation. (How ironic that the same year that America
gave up control of its money to private bankers, Canada did as well
under the Bank Act of 1913. In fact, private banks control the money
of almost all Western countries, and yes, those banks are very often
owned or controlled by Jews).
WWI
Fact: America became involved in WWI due to Jewish intervention.
England was in danger of losing the war when Jews secretly approached
the British government with an unusual offer: the Jews, using their
powerful influence within American President Woodrow Wilson's inner
circle, would persuade Wilson to enter America into the war if the
British government would declare its support for the creation of a
Jewish homeland in Palestine. As a result of that offer, Wilson's
close Jewish advisors, such as Louis Brandeis, Bernard Baruch and
Rabbi Stephen Wise, urged Wilson to aid the British war effort by
committing American troops to enter WWI. Another Jew, Chaim Weizmann,
was the key player on the British side of the plan to inject America
into WWI. That the vast majority of the American people wanted nothing
to do with the European war, and that Wilson had campaigned on the
specific promise to keep America out of the war, turned out not to
matter. The will of the people was abandoned for the will of the Jews.
The British government pledged its support for the creation of a
Jewish state in a document that became known as the Balfour
Declaration. That declaration was issued after America had entered
WWI. The Balfour Declaration was written by one Jew, Leopold Amery,
and edited by another Jew, Louis Brandeis, who was the first Jewish
justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. The reader should be aware of the
fact that WWI led directly to WWII. In fact, many people feel that
WWII was merely a continuation of WWI.
'Russian' Revolution/Comintern Founded
Probably the most important event in recent history, aside from WWII,
was the so-called 'Russian' Revolution, which occurred in late 1917.
In that revolution, communists gained control of Russia, murdering and
enslaving millions of its citizens, most of whom were gentiles. Nearly
all of the top communists in Russia -- first called 'Bolsheviks' but
later 'Soviets' -- were Jewish and not from Russian stock. Their
leader, V.I. Lenin, was, as we mentioned previously, part-Jewish.
After Lenin's death, Joseph Stalin led the Soviet communists. Stalin
was not Jewish but he was married to a Jew (in his third, common-law
marriage). The Russian Revolution was financed by the Jewish banker
Jacob Schiff, who furnished the communists with millions of dollars.
After gaining control of Russia, the Soviets spread communism
worldwide through an organ of the Soviet government called the
Comintern. The Comintern sent agents around the globe to foment
revolutions which, it hoped, eventually would result in the
installation of communist regimes in every nation. The Comintern was
run by a Jew named Grigory Zinoviev. Because of the Comintern's
actions many countries around the world were later enslaved under
communist dictatorships, e.g. North Korea and Cuba. China was also
communized by Jewish/Soviet emissaries, e.g. Adolf Abramovitch Joffe
(aka Yoffe) and Mikhail Markovich Borodin.
It should be recognized that the mass murder that occurred in Russia
from 1917 onward was carried out almost exclusively by Jews, including
Lazar Kaganovich, Leon Trotsky, Yakov Sverdlov, Yakov Yurovsky and
Genrikh Yagoda. The few top Soviet officials who were not Jewish were
married to Jews, for example Rykov, Molotov, Dzherzhinsky and Bukharin
(not counting the previously-mentioned Stalin). Soviet communism had
racially-Jewish roots until Stalin became frustrated with their
domination of the government and purged a significant number of Jews
including Kamenev, Zinoviev, Radek, and Yagoda.
Of interest regarding the 'Russian' Revolution is that British leader
Winston Churchill wrote a newspaper article in 1920 titled "Zionism
versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People," in
which he echoed the coming Nazis in pointing out that that the
'Russian' revolution was led mostly by Jews. Churchill's
never-mentioned article is available on the web.
The Creation of the Versailles Treaty
Critically important to modern history was the Versailles Treaty of
1919, which carved Germany into pieces as the conclusion of WWI.
European states wanted to punish Germany for her role in the war, and
the way they did so was through that treaty. (It should be recognized
that WWI was not started by Germany, as is often claimed, but by
Austria-Hungary, which declared war upon Serbia in July 1914). Under
the questionable Versailles Treaty, parts of Germany were given to
various European countries including France, Poland, Denmark and
Belgium.
Most important about the Versailles Treaty, however, was the fact that
Jews were key advisors to most if not all of the top government
officials who attended the peace conference that produced it. The Jew
Bernard Baruch advised U.S. President Wilson at the conference, while
British Prime Minister Lloyd George was advised by the Jew Phil
Sassoon. And French leader Georges Clemenceau was advised by his
Jewish Interior Minister Georges Mandel aka Louis Rothschild.
Furthermore, Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise advised U.S. president
Wilson about matters surrounding the impending treaty before Wilson
left America to attend the peace conference. The Versailles Treaty
caused WWII to occur by default, culminating in Hitler attempting to
unravel the Versailles Treaty by invading Poland in 1939. The treaty
was unjust and several Western leaders admitted that it was, including
British Prime Minister A. Neville Chamberlain.
The Impact of Jewish Marxists/Socialists in pre-Hitler Germany
From just after WWI until the early 1930s Germany was in severe
turmoil. Among the worst of her troubles were communist
revolutionaries starting riots in German cities lasting as long as
five days. The riots were intended to destabilize Germany as a first
step towards communization of the country. Also among Germany's
troubles was incredible monetary inflation.
Most of Germany's troublemaking revolutionaries were Jewish. Karl
Radek, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg, for example. In fact, those
three people attempted coups in several European locations.
Furthermore, pre-Hitler -- aka Weimar -- Germany was run by a
government containing many Jews, such as Foreign Minister Walter
Rathenau. The Weimar constitution was even written by a Jew, Hugo
Preuss. Jews drove the leftist and Marxist movements in Germany, which
influenced, for example, such matters as art and architecture and even
sexual behavior. Weimar Germany's media were also largely in Jewish
hands, as were her financial institutions -- not surprising since Jews
tend to dominate these vocations in most Western countries.
Hitler Comes to Power, and the Frankfurt School Leaves for America
When Adolf Hitler assumed power in Germany in 1933, he set about
correcting the problems Germany faced. Among his actions were
imprisoning Jewish revolutionaries and strengthening the German
economy by the ingenious use of 'Mefo' bonds, which in a short time
transformed Germany's economy into the most powerful in Europe.
Indeed, Germany achieved full employment in four years under Hitler's
rule. (It is important to contrast Hitler's quick and successful
transformation of Germany's economy to American president F. D.
Roosevelt's failed attempts to rescue America's economy from a severe
depression. FDR's economic programs were largely 'artificial' in that
the government, not private business, created jobs via large projects
funded by U.S. tax dollars. In other words, tax dollars were used to
pay taxpayers).
Coinciding with the rise of Nazism, an influential group of Jewish
intellectuals fled Germany and came to America. This group, known as
the Frankfurt School, injected Marxist ideas into American life via
major U.S. universities. The Frankfurt School -- including such Jews
as Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm and Max Horkheimer --
profoundly changed America's social fabric. Indeed, much of the social
turmoil of the 1960s can be traced to the prior influence of these
Frankfurt Jews.
The Beginnings of WWII and the Role of FDR's Jewish Cabal
In the early 1930s, certain Jews began to set the stage for WWII. In
both Britain and America, Jews in important positions of power
maneuvered to get the British and American governments to actively
oppose Hitler's Germany. Furthermore, Jews themselves declared
financial 'war' on Germany just after Hitler took power. Such a 'war'
declaration occurred before Hitler had imprisoned the Jews or
curtailed Jewish legal rights. In other words, Jews struck the first
blow in their battle against Hitler's new regime.
It is important for the reader to understand that long before Hitler
had imprisoned the Jews or invaded any country, American president
Franklin D. Roosevelt officially recognized Germany's enemy, the
communist Soviet Union (in November 1933), That the president of a
free country would recognize a brutal communist state that had already
murdered millions of people -- a fact likely known to Roosevelt -- is
significant, and offers insight into Roosevelt's administration. Some
of the people surrounding Roosevelt were communists, for example U.S.
Treasury official Harry Dexter White. Other Roosevelt staffers were,
if not actual communists, then sympathetic towards communism, e.g.
FDR's vice-president Henry Wallace. Roosevelt himself told Congressman
Martin Dies that "several of the best friends I have got" were
communists (noted in the Congressional Record, Sept. 22, 1950, page
A6832).
The Jews in Roosevelt's inner circle persuaded him to treat both
Germany and Japan as dangerous enemies of America, which Roosevelt
did. Concerning Britain, powerful Jews such as Bernard Baruch worked
to push top officials in the same direction. (Of note regarding
England vis-a-vis Germany is that when Winston Churchill was in severe
debt due to gambling losses, he became indebted to Baruch since Baruch
helped rescue him from bankruptcy[2]; the world will likely never know
to what lengths Churchill was willing to go to return Baruch's favor.
Furthermore, Churchill deeply disliked Germany, and possibly envied
Hitler's success).
When President Roosevelt suggested in a speech in 1937 that America
might have to wage war in the near future, watchful Americans knew
that war with the future Axis powers -- Germany, Japan and Italy --
was imminent. Such an early suggestion of war, years before WWII
began, gave good insight into Roosevelt's intentions.
Roosevelt knew that war with Japan would provide a back door through
which America could enter WWII. That entry would allow America to help
defeat Hitler for the benefit of both world Jewry and England. FDR
knew that if he punished Japan - an ally of Germany - past a certain
point, the Japanese would attack America in retaliation. In fact, as
historian Harry Elmer Barnes pointed out in his 1953 book "Perpetual
War For Perpetual Peace," FDR began to antagonize Japan soon after
becoming president in 1933. In the end, FDR and world Jewry got
exactly what they wanted: the defeat of Nazi Germany, the biggest
threat to ever face world Jewry and international leftism. It must be
clearly understood: WWII was all about Germany and the Jews. Japan was
but a secondary issue, despite outward appearances to the contrary.
Before WWII began, Jew-dominated Hollywood played a crucial role in
persuading American citizens that Hitler and the Germans were
dangerous to America's safety. For example, Hollywood produced movies
that portrayed the Germans as wanting to take over either America or
the entire world. One such film was "Confessions of a Nazi Spy,"
starring Jewish actor Edward G. Robinson.
Jews were also key players in silencing people who opposed the growing
anti-Germany movement in America. Prominent citizens who questioned
the dangerousness of Germany to America were labeled "isolationists"
and fiercely criticized. Those isolationists, such as famed aviator
Charles Lindbergh, were unofficially blacklisted in America, their
voices silenced by a concerted campaign funded largely by Jewish
money. Jews funneled money into many anti-Germany organizations, such
as the Fight For Freedom Committee, which received some winking
support from Roosevelt's administration.
Also of note concerning the beginnings of WWII was Hitler's unique
economy. Among other features, the German economy had a barter system
that cut out the international Jewish bankers. For example, Germany
traded trucks to Argentina in exchange for grain. Instead of both
Germany and Argentina approaching international bankers for loans at
high interest rates, both countries simply bypassed the lenders via
barter. Such exchanges angered the Jew-dominated global financiers. As
a result, economic warfare was directed against Germany by Jew-led
factions fearful that other nations might copy her example.
The event that officially started WWII, Hitler's invasion of Poland,
can be explained by the fact that Hitler was attempting to reverse the
unfairness of the Versailles Treaty and reclaim traditionally German
territory. Hitler asked Poland at least twice to return the city of
Danzig and the Polish Corridor to Germany before invading in 1939.
Poland refused. Also of significance is that after Hitler invaded
Poland, he offered to pull his troops out of that country if he could
keep Danzig and the Corridor. Britain and France refused Hitler's
offer. (Did they prefer war instead?)
Of further importance concerning WWII is the fact that Hitler probably
did not realize how influential Jews were in shaping the policies of
the British government in 1939. Hitler likely thought that he was
opposing only gentiles in England. What he probably did not realize
about Britain was that, like most European governments, Britain was
beholden to powerful Jews. Those Jews not only aided the British
government financially, they also traveled in the highest social
circles, having been named 'barons' and 'lords' long before. The Jews
received those lofty titles not for their heritage but instead for
their important financial services to the British government. In fact,
ever since Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews to return to England in
the 1650s (they had been expelled by King Edward the First, known as
"Longshanks," in 1290), Jews had exercised significant influence on
political and social events in England.
The popular idea that Britain and France had to guarantee Poland's
borders by declaring war on Germany after Germany invaded Poland is
wrong. Days after Germany invaded Poland, the Soviets invaded as well,
from the opposite side. Britain and France did not then declare war on
the Soviet Union. Why did England and France allow the Soviets to
invade Poland but not Germany? The 1939 Anglo-Polish treaty which led
to WWII, and not the secret protocols of it, did not specify which
countries Britain would defend Poland against. Additionally, that
treaty -- the Agreement of Mutual Assistance -- was not properly
ratified since it did not 'sit' for 21 days under the Ponsonby Rule,
as was normally required under British policy. Translation: Britain's
guaranteeing of Poland's borders was unlawful.
Most important of all, however, about WWII is that there is now clear
evidence that certain powerful men had planned to remove Hitler from
power long before he invaded Poland. As outlined in the book Which Way
Western Man? by William G. Simpson, both Winston Churchill and various
powerful Jews began making plans to topple Hitler as early as 1935, by
any means necessary. For example, U.S. General Robert E. Wood told a
U.S. Congressional committee that Churchill told him in 1936 that
England must "smash" Germany. That such a comment came 3 years before
WWII began is of critical historical importance.
The Defeat of Germany and the Creation of the Morgenthau Plan
The defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 was not simply a military victory
for the allies. It amounted to the revenge of world Jewry. The biggest
racial threat to the Jews in recent history -- Nazi Germany -- had not
merely been defeated in war but had been virtually wiped off the map.
Entire cities such as Dresden were burnt to the ground. Millions of
innocent German citizens were either killed, injured or left homeless.
All traces of the former German culture were destroyed. People having
no official role in the Nazi government were executed by the allies,
such as Julius Streicher and Alfred Rosenberg. Other former Nazi
officials were tried and hanged by the allies at Nuremberg using ex
post facto laws, hearsay evidence, and confessions gained under
torture administered by interrogators - who were often Jewish. Of
significance is the fact that as early as December 1942 the allied
powers had decided to prosecute German military personnel for war
crimes committed during WWII.
Roosevelt's August 1944 comment that the entire German people -- not
simply former Nazis -- should be "castrated" to prevent them from
reproducing reveals the Roosevelt administration's attitude towards
Germany in general. U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower said that the top
German officials should be punished beyond the death penalty, whatever
that might have meant. Of possible interest regarding 'Ike's' comment
is that Eisenhower's nickname at West Point military academy was 'The
Swedish Jew.' Also, no castration suggestions were offered by allied
leaders concerning the Japanese people, even though the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor caused America to enter WWII in the first
place. Also of importance is the fact that two Jews -- Henry
Morgenthau, Jr. and the communist Harry Dexter White -- wrote the U.S.
government's Morgenthau Plan, which restructured post-war Germany to
Jewish benefit. A greater example of a conflict of interest would be
hard to find.
Also regarding the matter of post-war Germany, after the war the
director general of the organization in charge of providing food and
housing for homeless Germans (the United Nations Relief and
Rehabilitation Administration, or UNRRA) was a Jew, Herbert Lehman.
UNRRA's chief advisor was also a Jew, David Weintraub.
Jews also played key roles in the prosecution of German military
personnel for war crimes committed during WWII. For example, in the
Malmedy massacre trial (U.S. vs. Valentin Bersin, et al.), the chief
interrogator of the accused German soldiers was a Jew, William Perl.
The chief prosecutor, Burton Ellis, was also a Jew. The chief
assistant prosecutor was a Jew as well, Raphael Schumaker.
Jews were also key players in the U.S. Office of War Information
(OWI), which created anti-Axis films, posters and photos for
propaganda purposes. That propaganda was used to influence the
attitudes of Western citizens towards Germany and Japan. Among the
Jews who worked for OWI were James Paul Warburg, Bernard M. Baruch,
Herbert Marcuse and Leo Rosten. Jews also helped 'de-Nazify' German
military personnel and the German public after WWII, and conflicts of
interests often occurred when that happened. For example, Jewish
Marxist Herbert Marcuse a) advised the allies about how to portray
German fascism to the Western public via mass media; and b) wrote a
handbook for the allies concerning de-Nazification. The
de-Nazification of Germany is so complete today that a German citizen
risks a stiff jail sentence if he merely utters a pro-Nazi comment in
public.
The Founding of the UN
Not only was the 'architect' of the United Nations, Leo Pasvolsky,
Jewish, but among the most important people involved in the founding
of the UN in 1945 were Jewish communists, such as Victor Perlo, Harry
Dexter White and Solomon Adler. The UN is a global entity of
considerable power which has influenced the cultures of many Western
countries. For example, in the late 1940s America adopted at least
some educational ideas that were created by a UN department called
UNESCO (i.e., those found in their Towards World Understanding
report). Those ideas concerned the content of textbooks in American
schools. President Truman's Commission on Higher Education endorsed
the ideas, which included teaching children about the benefits of
"international government" (aka 'surrendering much of your country's
autonomy to a global body').
The controversial 1951 UN/UNESCO 'Statement on the Nature of Race and
Race Differences,' which denied human racial differences and altered
peoples' attitudes about race, was largely the invention of infamous
Jewish anthropologist Ashley Montagu. That statement seemed to further
highlight the ongoing Jewish agenda on race. Another example of that
agenda: as far back as 1935, Franz Boas -- the Jewish godfather of
race-denial who inspired Montagu's efforts -- approached two top
scientists and asked them to create an anti-racism/race-denial
statement, which would be signed by many other scientists and then
publicized. Both of the scientists that Boas approached,
anthropologist and psychologist Livingston Farrand and biologist
Raymond Pearl, turned Boas down. Not one to give up easily, Boas then
approached yet another race expert, anthropologist Earnest Hooton.
Hooton agreed to create such a race statement (he sent it to seven top
scientists but only one signed it).
Amazingly, the UNESCO race statement claimed that Jews are not a race
or ethnic group, even though Jews contract 'Jewish diseases,' such as
Tay-Sachs disease.
Other top experts who created race-denying/race-downplaying material
for the UN or UNESCO were also Jewish, including Melville Herskovits,
Otto Klineberg and Harry Shapiro. In fact, Jews pioneered the
false-but-ubiquitous 'official' theory that racial differences between
Whites and non-Whites do not really exist. The teachings of the Jews
mentioned above were used to drastically alter Western culture, e.g.
in arguing for the enactment of civil-rights legislation.
Despite the usual UN stance on Israel/Palestine, the UN has been good
for Jews, i.e. the UN's social leveling programs and equality-for-all
ideology have drastically lessened 'anti-Semitism' worldwide.
The Control of Eastern Europe After WWII
Not only was Russia controlled by Jews for many years, but countries
in post-war Eastern Europe were as well. For example, communist Poland
was run by Jewish figures including Jacob Berman, Boleslaw Bierut and
Colonel Jozef Rozanski. Communist Romania was run by people such as
Ana Pauker, Avram Bunaciu and Valter Roman. Hungary's communist
government was also heavily Jewish, for example Mathias Rakosi, Ernest
Gero and Michael Farkas. Under the leadership of those Jews, hundreds
of thousands of people -- most of them gentiles -- were murdered,
tortured or imprisoned throughout Eastern Europe.
The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) Investigations
In 1947 the U.S. Congress, via the House Un-American Activities
Committee (HUAC), began investigating the Hollywood film industry due
to charges that Hollywood had been infiltrated by communism (it had
been). A large number of actors, directors and screenwriters were
members of the Communist Party and as such were getting marching
orders from the Soviet Union. During that period, a group of people
known as the Hollywood Ten refused to answer questions before the HUAC
committee. They were then charged with contempt of Congress. A
disproportionate number of the Hollywood Ten were Jews, including
Herbert Biberman, Samuel Ornitz, Ring Lardner, Jr. and Albert Maltz,
as were the people who were 'blacklisted' during that era. (A
blacklisting meant that a person could not work in Hollywood due to
his political activities.)
Of important note concerning HUAC was how that committee -- and the
similar McCarthy committee later on -- was portrayed by the media and
Hollywood. HUAC's mission - identifying people who were attempting to
communize America on behalf of the Soviet Union -- was described as an
un-American 'witch hunt.' Declassified U.S. and Soviet government
reports, such as the Venona Intercepts, show that those 'witch
hunters' were correct: communists had infiltrated many areas of
American society.
Significantly, the majority of American communist leaders have been
Jews, including Herbert Aptheker, Victor Perlo, Jay Lovestone and
Benjamin Gitlow.
The Founding of Israel
Immense and concerted pressure was placed upon U.S. President Harry
Truman so that he would endorse the idea of creating a Jewish state in
Palestine. Naturally, most of that pressure came from Jews. Indeed, at
one point Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler led a group of Jews to the
White House. There, during a conversation with Truman, Celler pounded
on the president's desk and said that if Truman did not give his
blessing for a Jewish nation, "we'll run you out of town." In fact,
Truman said that "extreme Zionists" had threatened him. Also of note
is the fact that Truman's Jewish friend Eddie Jacobson contacted
Truman to urge him to support a Jewish state. But before Jacobson
contacted Truman, Jacobson was briefed on Palestinian matters by Dewey
Stone, a Zionist leader (which might make one wonder how Jacobson came
to contact Truman and on whose behalf he might have been acting).
The creation of the state of Israel was extremely important to the
Jews. Most of all, it gave them legitimacy. They were no longer seen
as a small tribe of 'troublemakers' who moved from country to country
getting evicted nearly every time. Now they were a people with their
own country and the trappings that go with it: ambassadors, a large
army and nuclear weapons. The Jews had finally arrived on the world
stage.
It should be understood that Israel was literally founded on
terrorism: Jewish revolutionaries, such as Menachem Begin, shot and
blew-up British soldiers, foreign diplomats and scores of Arabs in a
violent effort to reclaim 'their' land. (Ironically, Israel now
condemns and fights terrorism).
Today, the Zionist lobby in Washington, D.C. wields enormous power
over Congress. As a result, Congressmen dare not criticize Israel in
public; those who do are usually not re-elected. Another result of
Zionist power in Washington is the ever-increasing funding of the
state of Israel by U.S. taxpayers.
Arabs and Muslims throughout the world hate America and most other
White countries because they see those countries as partners and
protectors of Israel, which they are - especially America.
The Cold War
The 'cold' war between America and the Soviet Union, which began just
after WWII and which was centered around both countries' nuclear
arsenals, became more sophisticated and more expensive as America
entered the 1950s. Billions of U.S. tax dollars were spent on atomic
weapons and various security features both inside and outside of the
U.S.
Of importance is the fact that the Cold War would never have occurred
in the first place if Jews hadn't created the Soviet Union.
Ironically, Jews a) were prime figures in creating America's first
atomic weapons program, called 'The Manhattan Project'; and b) were
also key players in networks which secretly provided U.S. atomic
weapons technology to the Soviet Union, e.g. the Rosenbergs, Harry
Gold and Robert Soblen. (For more information on the transfer of
atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, see the Fuchs-Gold or the
Rosenberg spy ring cases in American historical documents).
The Increased Use of the Word "Democracy" in America
As the Jewish foothold in the American publishing world became more
solid, there appeared an increased use of the term "democracy" within
books, newspapers and magazines to describe America.
The U.S. constitution contains no mention of "democracy," nor did
America's founders use that word. America was created instead as a
White republic in which only White males could vote or hold public
office, and the Jews are very aware of that fact.
The U.S. Civil-Rights Movement
The history of the 1950s-1960s civil-rights movement might go
unnoticed by many White citizens if it were not for the fact that that
movement was created and steered by Jews, not by Blacks. Indeed, the
NAACP was founded by and run for many years by Jews, such as the
Spingarn brothers. Other important Jews in the NAACP included Henry
Moskowitz, Lillian Wald, Jack Greenberg and Kivie Kaplan.
The groundbreaking Brown v. Board of Education court ruling in 1954
resulted almost entirely from the work of Jewish lawyers and activists
connected with the NAACP, for example Jack Greenberg. Indeed, the
legal brief for Brown was signed almost exclusively by Jews. Jewish
activist Esther Swirk Brown was also a prime player in the Brown case.
In fact, Swirk Brown actually launched the Brown case herself.[3]
It could be said that, within the U.S. Congress at least,
Representative Celler (see elsewhere in this essay) launched the Black
civil-rights movement in America via his House bill H.R.6127, which
when signed into law became the first civil-rights law created since
the 1800s: the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
Furthermore, the constitutionally questionable U.S. Civil Rights Act
of 1964 came from a Jew, i.e. Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
7152. That act created, among other things, affirmative action. It
ended the practice of business owners deciding for themselves whom to
hire and fire. In fact, the destruction of White rights in America was
caused largely by the Jew-created and Jew-led civil-rights movement.
(Of possible interest to the reader is that the Civil Rights Act of
1964 created the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC), which is responsible for ensuring that private employers obey
the racial mandates of Title VII of the Act. Perhaps not surprisingly,
two Jews, Alfred and Ruth Blumrosen, were key players in the
construction of the EEOC, and Alfred was also the commission's first
compliance chief (and is also referred to as its conciliations chief).
Mr. Blumrosen shaped the racial quota guidelines that the EEOC would
follow for decades to come. In fact, Blumrosen could be considered to
be the godfather of racial quotas in America - at least as far as
federal enforcement of racial quotas in employment is concerned.[4]
Furthermore, Sonia Pressman, a Jewish EEOC attorney, was a prime
figure in the movement to extend the EEOC's reach to include
gender-discrimination-in-employment into its legal jurisdiction.
Pressman worked with NOW, a feminist group containing many Jews, in an
attempt to force the EEOC to become more involved with gender bias
matters).
The civil-rights movement also transformed the attitudes of American
Blacks: before the civil-rights movement Blacks were largely
respectful of Whites. Today Blacks openly denigrate White culture and
challenge White authority. They demand that 'whitey' now show them
respect which they may or may not have earned.
The Vatican's 1965 'Nostra Aetate' Declaration
As Look magazine noted in January 1966, in an article titled "How The
Jews Changed Catholic Thinking," a Jew named Jules Isaac approached
the Vatican about a possible Catholic condemnation of 'anti-Semitism.'
His action resulted in the famous, official Vatican ruling that the
Jews were not responsible for Jesus Christ's death. The ruling was a
very significant victory for all Jews worldwide. Of importance is that
after the Vatican statement was issued, Jews did not then issue a
similar declaration admitting to and condemning Judaism's historic and
harsh anti-gentile attitudes - attitudes which pre-date Christianity.
U.S. Immigration Law Altered
Jews have also led the movement in the U.S. Congress to open America
to non-European immigration. The best example of that is the 1965
Immigration Act, aka the Hart-Celler Act, which resulted in a
revolutionary change in U.S. immigration rules. Congressman Celler was
the point man for that law, even though he is listed second, after
Hart, in the title 'Hart-Celler.' Indeed, President Johnson mentioned
Celler twice at the signing of the bill, H.R. 2580, into law on Oct.
3, 1965, but did not mention Hart. Other Jews in Congress such as
Jacob Javits and Herbert Lehman also spearheaded the movement to allow
more non-Europeans into America. An influential Jew and immigration
lawyer named Edward Dubroff regularly advised Congressman Celler about
immigration issues.
Additionally, powerful Jewish organizations carried out intense,
ongoing campaigns in order to pressure individual Congressmen to vote
for the loosening of U.S. immigration laws. At nearly every step of
the campaign to alter U.S. immigration rules, Jews were at the
forefront.
The Rise of American Leftism and Counterculture
Not surprisingly, the American political Left was built largely by
Jews as well. For example, Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid
the foundation for the American 'hippie' counterculture via his
popular book One-Dimensional Man (1964). Other famous Jews who led the
1960s hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul
Krassner. Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement from behind
the scenes by publishing, writing for, or editing leftist newspapers
and magazines. And anti-war/college activism groups were
disproportionately filled with Jews, too, e.g. Students for a
Democratic Society (SDS), the top leaders of which were Jews, for
example Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and Mike Klonsky.
Similarly, most of the leaders of the feminist movement have been
Jews, for example Betty Friedan, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Lucy Komisar
and Gloria Steinem. Most of the leaders of the homosexual-rights
movement have been Jews, such as Larry Kramer, Alan Klein and Arnie
Kantrowitz. Gun control in the U.S. Congress has been dominated by
Jews such as Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Howard Metzenbaum.
Indeed, Jews created two landmark anti-gun laws in the 1990s: the
Brady law, which came from Howard Metzenbaum and Charles Schumer, and
the assault-rifle ban, which came from Dianne Feinstein and Schumer.
In fact, America's first significant anti-gun legislation, the Gun
Control Act of 1968, came from Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
17735. Probably the most disturbing anti-gun legislation in recent
years - for gun owners and constitutional-rights advocates alike -
came from Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg, whose domestic confiscation
provision became law in 1996. That law prevents someone convicted of a
certain misdemeanor crime from owning a gun. In other words, a
misdemeanor conviction abolishes a constitutional right that our
gentile Founders gave us.
Even the famous 1969 Woodstock rock-and-roll concert was created by
Jews: Michael Lang, Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
Furthermore, a Jewish man named Elliot Tiber persuaded yet another
Jew, Max Yasgur, to allow the Woodstock concert to be held on Yasgur's
farmland.
Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
The Growth of Hollywood and the U.S. Media
Of tremendous importance to America's culture is that the Hollywood
film community, and the American media as well, is dominated by Jews.
In fact, Jews founded the major Hollywood movie studios, e.g. Carl
Laemmle (Universal Pictures), William Fox (Fox Film Corp.), Louis B.
Mayer (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures).
Some of the more well-known Jews in modern Hollywood and the media
include film directors Steven Spielberg and Woody Allen, the Disney
Co.'s Michael Eisner, actors Dustin Hoffman and Kirk Douglas,
comedians Milton Berle and Don Rickles and news journalists Mike
Wallace, Barbara Walters and Ted Koppel (more information about Jews,
Hollywood and the media can be found in the essay "Who Rules America?"
by National Vanguard Books, available on the web or in their book
catalogue).
Indeed, as the 1960s hippie revolution was occurring, another
revolution of sorts was happening in Hollywood. Jewish network
executives began to churn out movies and TV shows featuring Black
actors in leading roles. Hollywood also produced a notorious movie
that featured an interracial relationship, which was still taboo at
the time. It is apparent that the Jews in Hollywood, believing that
the pro-White attitudes of America's Founders would never return,
became much bolder during the 1960s. (Regarding the Founders'
attitudes about race, a law created in the Founders' era, 'Act of
March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104),' stated that only Whites could become
American citizens. In fact, non-Whites had no significant rights in
America until the XV Amendment was created in 1870).
As America entered the 1970s it became common for White Americans to
see Blacks, Jews and even Asians in prominent vocations on TV shows
and in movies. Those minorities were seen portraying judges, police
detectives and attorneys on screens big and small all over the U.S.
Non-Hollywood media also flourished in America from the 1960s onward.
The news departments at most broadcasting companies were run by, or
heavily staffed by, Jews. Major U.S. newspapers also came under Jewish
control as small newspapers were bought out by big media conglomerates
which were dominated by Jews. Furthermore, as American culture was
being socially 'Jewified,' so were the cultures of other Western
countries being similarly Jewified via American movies and TV shows,
which became popular in many countries. America served as a base of
sorts for the exporting of Jew-created movies and TV shows which
featured leftist and politically-correct messages, which served
various Jewish social objectives.
The Rise of Big Capitalism
Big capitalism drives corner grocers out of business and outsources
jobs to third-world countries. It encourages materialism. And it leads
to the importing of inexpensive goods in massive quantities, which
also causes American jobs to vanish.
Even though Jews are known for their leftist behavior, they
nonetheless pioneered giant capitalism and corporatism. Jews
especially pioneered conglomerates, in which one large company owns a
dozen smaller companies.
The Rise of Neoconservatism
Beginning in the 1980s, the conservative or "right-wing" political
movement in America was slowly overtaken by what is known as the
"neoconservative" movement. The neoconservative ideology is not really
conservative but is instead politically moderate, and is even liberal
regarding certain issues like civil rights. The neoconservative
movement was launched by formerly-liberal Jews and its current leaders
are mostly Jews. The neoconservative movement's main focus is on how
to use America to protect the interests of Israel.
Neoconservatism has resulted in America being alienated from many
former allied countries in the world, e.g. France.
Neoconservatism has now almost completely replaced traditional
conservatism in America, with genuine conservatives now consigned to
the margins of politics and often referred to as "racists" or
"bigots."
The Bombing of the U.S. Marine Barracks
In October 1983, 220 U.S. Marine Corp soldiers were killed in a
suicide bombing of their barracks in Beirut, Lebanon. The Marines were
stationed in Beirut due to Israel's actions - most especially because
of Israel's role in the 1982 massacre of hundreds of Palestinians at
the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Beirut.
Today, the barracks bombing is but a distant memory, and few people
connect the event with Israel.
Holocaust Remembrance Emerges as a Growth and Guilt Industry
Since the 1970s, the Jewish memorializing of the Holocaust has become
an industry of enormous and ever-increasing size. So powerful and
industrialized is Holocaust-remembrance-mania that some American
states require, by law, the teaching of Holocaust education in public
schools. Law-enforcement training academies often mandate Holocaust
studies as well.
The Sept. 11, 2001 attack on America/the 2003 Iraq War
The terrorist attack(s) upon the United States on Sept. 11, 2001
transformed not only America but also the rest of the West. It caused
all of the White Western countries to reexamine, and then rebuild,
their security apparatuses, at significant financial expense. More
than that, it changed how those countries viewed the Arab world, since
the attack appeared to have been planned and carried out by Arab
extremists.
As a result of the 2001 attack, the U.S. Congress passed a
heavy-handed law called the "USA PATRIOT Act." That law canceled or
curbed many of the rights that Americans had traditionally enjoyed -
rights that the Founders had included into the Bill of Rights.
It is no longer a secret that the reason the United States was
attacked by terrorists in Sept. 2001 was because of America's vigorous
support of Israel. Put another way, Jews caused the Sept. 11, 2001
attack, albeit indirectly, for if it wasn't for powerful Zionist
political influence in Washington, D.C., the United States would not
have been so staunchly supportive of Israel. (In fact, America didn't
vigorously support Israel until the 1973 Middle East war. Shortly
after that war, a Jewish-American diplomat, Henry Kissinger, created a
strong, lasting partnership between America and Israel by engineering
a document called the "Memorandum of Understanding." That document
created, for all practical purposes, the so-called "special"
relationship that now exists between the two countries).
The 2001 terrorist attack upon the U.S. also led to America's
involvement in the 2003-present Iraq War, since the former event was
used in a vague, roundabout way as an excuse for American soldiers to
invade and occupy Iraq.
Of significance regarding America's involvement in the Iraq War was a
committee within America's Pentagon called the Office of Special Plans
(OSP). The OSP was designed to funnel information about Iraq directly
to the White House, thereby bypassing the usual filters that such
information would normally travel through, i.e. other governmental
intelligence agencies. According to news sources, shortly before the
Iraq War, the OSP provided President George W. Bush with certain
information about Iraqi weapons programs. That information was
incorrect, but nonetheless it was later used by the White House as a
reason for American soldiers to invade Iraq - an invasion carried out
for Israel's benefit [5].
The OSP was staffed by a number of Jews, such as Harold Rhode, Douglas
Feith and OSP director Abram Shulsky. Feith, and various other
so-called "neoconservatives," had a history of suggesting an attack
upon Saddam Hussein's Iraq dating back to the 1990s, e.g. they were
involved in the creation of a 1996 policy paper that mentioned
"removing Saddam Hussein from power" [6]. That such a removal idea
emerged years before the pre-war "discovery" of Saddam's "weapons of
mass destruction" is significant. Furthermore, under OSP's watch,
Israeli officials came and went at the Pentagon in the days prior to
the Iraq War (apparently to aid American war efforts) while observing
few of the standard security procedures intended for visitors [7].
Also, the OSP itself was conceived by a Jew, Paul Wolfowitz, and
further, it worked closely with an anti-Iraq committee located within
the Israeli government, a committee which was similar to OSP in its
anti-Iraq aims [8].
It should be noted that the major claims of OSP regarding Iraq - that
Saddam had ties to the terrorist group Al Qaeda and that he possessed
"weapons of mass destruction" - proved to be false.
It is probable that without the actions of Jews, the Sept. 11, 2001
terrorist attack upon America and the 2003 Iraq War would not have
occurred, nor would America be such a vigorous supporter of Israel. In
fact, it is easy to conclude that America would have no significant
"Arab problem" if not for Jews.
The Creation of the U.S. Anti-Semitism-Monitoring Office
In 2004, an office was created within the U.S. State Department to
"monitor" anti-Semitism worldwide, despite the fact that 1) that
department insisted that it did not want such an office to be created;
and 2) America is not a Jewish country.
The legislation which created the anti-Semitism-monitoring office,
called the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, came from Jewish
congressman Tom Lantos as bill H.R. 4230.
It was a big victory for the Jews. That office gave world Jewry a
powerful, 'official' weapon with which to combat people who oppose
Jewish supremacism and/or Zionism. (One might wonder how it's the
business of the U.S. government if, for example, anti-Semitic acts are
committed in Thailand. One might also wonder why there are no U.S.
government offices designed to monitor anti-White, anti-Black or
anti-Christian behavior worldwide).
Like the previously-mentioned OSI and the neoconservative movement, we
again see the Jews using the U.S. government as a tool with which to
further their racial agenda.
Summary
The information above shows that the impact that Jews have had upon
the world -- and especially upon the West -- during the past 200 years
is remarkable. Important questions arise from the impact of the Jews:
without their actions, would WWII have occurred? Would America have
had a 50-year Cold War with the Soviet Union? Would the Soviet Union
even have existed in the first place? Would the Vietnam War have
occurred? Would America be as politically liberal as it is today?
Would America have been involved in wars in the Middle East? Those are
questions for Westerners to ponder at length.
Even more remarkable is how the Western public never hears about the
influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist' or
'socialist' are used to describe Jewish social activists in the West
but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that that lack of mention of the
Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to their tremendous
power. By using a) frequent mentions of the Holocaust; b) the media;
c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and e) significant political
influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to their ends. Gentiles who
complain about that Jewish rebuilding -- and their own dispossession
as a result of it -- are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and marginalized into
ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined above is, again, not
a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive behavior by them,
which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
oppressed yet again, or, will be again expelled from Western countries
(Jews have been expelled from most Western countries at one time or
another).
Also curious, and telling, is the fact that even though the religion
of Judaism is based upon bigotry, that fact is rarely mentioned by
modern Christians. Their silence about Judaism's hatred is both
widespread and quite noticeable, as if Christians are constantly
checking themselves to ensure that they aren't uttering "anti-Semitic"
words or phrases. In other words, the power of the Jews is so great
that it actually produces self-censorship within the world's Christian
communities.
Finally, it is interesting to note how quickly Jews accomplished the
rebuilding of America, the Western powerbase of the Jews: in roughly
50 years. Before President Roosevelt took office in 1933 Jews had
little influence upon American culture on the whole. But by 1983 Jews
dominated American culture via television, movies, newspapers,
magazines and other cultural organs. That a people constituting just
2.5% of the U.S. population could significantly alter the culture of
the most powerful country in the world in such a short time is very
significant. Also significant is that there is not a single
educational institution anywhere in the United States in which you
will see the facts about Jews and their interests assembled and
presented in logical connection as we have here.
Dave Heil
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
The recent PBS documentary showed the hideously charred body of Goebbels
in film shot just months after he wrote "The Creators of the World's
Misfortunes". He killed his wife and children, then took his own life.
The bodies of the family members were then set ablaze.
Adolf Hitler and his concubine were also dead at their own hands.
Thus ended the Thousand Year Reich and a great deal of evil.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
> <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Explain how race-mixing caused Portugal to fall.
>>
> The people became less White (less intelligent and creative).
I've encountered large numbers of people in my travels in and out of
Lisbon, Topie. Without exception, those I met seemed sharper than you.
How do you account for that?
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 03:35:49 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Stolen? Sorry, Topie. Aggressors who become the losers in war, do not
>> get to dictate the surrender. Germany should not have declared war the
>> first or second time.
> By Mark Weber
>
> Much has already been written...
Then there's no need to do it again.
Nothing on Germany starting not one, but two world wars?
>> We're in the middle of a war with terrorists, Topie. I wouldn't go
>> around looking like a foreign or domestic terrorist if I were you.
>
> Who can say "We" when referring to America? Definately the Jews.
> Maybe women and minorities. Certainly not a White man.
I'm a white man. I say so. So do millions and millions of others.
White people, Asians, Hispanics, Blacks. We say so. Then there's you
and your ilk.
I don't care if you're the illegitimate son of George Lincoln Rockwell,
I wouldn't go around making noises like or looking like foreign or
domestic terrorists right now.
Dave Heil
> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> Otto Dietrich
>
> The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
> immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
> soul.
It rests on its on rubble.
> We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
> is. He united State and Nation in Germany.
He's stone cold dead. Modern emulators like George Lincoln Rockwell and
Robert Mathews are dead. Nothing good comes from hatred.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> From a German pamphlet:
Wiener Schnitzel
Preparation:
If cutlets are large, cut to make 4 pieces. Pound to flatten to about
1/4 inch thick. Cut slits around edges of cutlets to prevent curling.
Heat oil over medium heat. Dredge meat in flour seasoned with salt and
pepper. Combine egg and milk in a wide, shallow bowl. Dip floured veal
cutlets in egg mixture, then in bread crumbs. Cook meat in hot oil for 2
to 3 minutes on each side, or until tender and golden brown. Serve veal
with lemon wedges.
Wiener Schnitzel serves 4. Veal Recipes
Dave Heil
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
Berliner Pfannekuchen (doughnuts)
Ingredients
7 cups flour
6-7 tbls. butter
5 tbls. sugar
1 tsp. salt
flavoring (optional)
(almond, lemon, or rum)
1-2 eggs
2 packages yeast
2 1/4 cups milk
as needed:
oil (canola)
brown paper bag (cut up)
granulated sugar
Preparation
In a large bowl, mix together the flour, butter, sugar, salt, and flavoring.
Add the eggs one by one.
Add the yeast to some warm (not hot) milk and put it into the mixture.
Let it rise for 40 minutes.
Roll the dough out to 1/3 inches thick and cut it into shapes with
cookie cutters or with the rims of large glasses.
Let them rise again until they are �light and fluffy.�
Fry them in oil (canola) 2 inches deep at 365-370*F.
Drain the doughnuts on absorbent paper (cut up paper bag).
Roll them in granulated sugar while they are still warm.
Dave Heil
> by VNN Staff
>
> revised December 2005
>
> Introduction
>
> The text below shows that Jews may well have influenced Western
> culture more than any other ethnic group, particularly over the last
> few hundred years. It is important to note that our writers allege no
> 'conspiracy' by Jews. Rather, the examples cited point to an inborn
> tendency of Jews to engage in behavior they believe will ensure their
> group's safety, no matter its effect on the gentiles they live among.
Isn't that peculiar? I'd have thought that *any* group would have a
tendency to engage in behavior which it believes will ensure its safety.
Now over the past 100 years, I'm going to guess that African Americans
have influenced popular culture. Even here in my rural area, kids with
baggy pants, slipping off their hips, backward ball caps, chains and
bling, hip hop music and the like are all the rage.
The Jews have the record for long term influence. That Jesus the
Messiah thing took off about 2,000 years back and is still quite
popular. Nazism, Neo-nazism, the Klan and other marginal white
supremacist groups aren't very popular.
Dave Heil
Topaz
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
Topaz
German leaders believed in death before dishonor. They knew the
allies were subhuman monsters:
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
ashamed."
p.961
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.
Topaz
Kevin MacDonald
http://theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html
America will soon have a white minority. This is a much desired state
of affairs for the hostile elites who hold political power and shape
public opinion. But it certainly creates some management issues -- at
least in the long run. After all, it's difficult to come up with an
historical example of a nation with a solid ethnic majority (90% white
in 1950) that has voluntarily decided to cede political and cultural
power. Such transformations are typically accomplished by military
invasions, great battles, and untold suffering. And it's not as if
everyone is doing it. Only Western nations view their own demographic
and cultural eclipse as a moral imperative.