Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

HSA Thinks We're Morons

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Wolfy

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 3:26:28 PM1/2/10
to
I'm amazed that intelligent Americans actually believe that the Homeland
Security Agency can protect us from terrorist attacks. First, consider the
fact that the Mexican and Canadian borders are so porous that many armed
insurgents can just walk right into the USA without being caught. Second,
it's not difficult for Al-Qaeda operatives to rent a Boeing 747 cargo jet in
an unfriendly country, file a flight plan to America, and just crash it into
a large building near the airport.

If you think that you're safe boarding an aircraft, think again! Our own
special-operatives are well trained in evading even X-ray machines as it's
part of their training. If that last wannabe bomber had been given an
actual shaped charge instead of powdered PTEN, that plane would have been
destroyed. Al-Qaeda is a professional organization that has demonstrated
numerous times that they can attack us anytime they wish.

When we give up our freedoms in our futile quest to be more secure, we're
also traveling down the road to fascism.

--
"If we don't study the mistakes of the past, then we are condemned to repeat
them".

Andrew Usher

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 3:35:45 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 2:26 pm, "Wolfy" <werewolfk...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> When we give up our freedoms in our futile quest to be more secure, we're
> also traveling down the road to fascism.

No shit! The HSA is nothing but a police-state agency, an American
Gestapo.

One could almost believe 9/11 was staged for the very purpose of
promoting paranoia so that we would cede our privacy to the
bureaucrats.

Andrew Usher

Society

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:00:43 AM1/3/10
to

"Wolfy" <werewo...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:0oSdnR_T9N5zNqLW...@earthlink.com...

>
> I'm amazed that intelligent Americans actually believe
> that the Homeland Security Agency can protect us
> from terrorist attacks. [...]

It's the Department of Homeland Security. Or did you
mean the federal Transportation Security Agency?

Obviously, you're not in the "intelligent Americans" group,
Wolfy. Sorry.

As for what might have left you "amazed," well consider
this: you're yammering about Americans who elected
Barack Hussein Obama, who elected bill clinton twice,
who almost elected algore, and when casting votes to
choose the nominee of the less irresponsible of the two
incumbent parties in America, made George W. Bush
their top choice for little reason other than name-ID.

You're shocked that a majority moron America is treated
like morons by its own government? One of those morons
you're prattling on about is _you._

--
It is as difficult to make a people free
that is resolved to live in servitude,
as it is to subject a people to servitude
that is determined to be free.

Machiavelli
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0699/machiavelli.html


Andrew Usher

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:24:01 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 12:00 am, "Society" <Soci...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:

> > I'm amazed that intelligent Americans actually believe
> > that the Homeland Security Agency can protect us
> > from terrorist attacks. [...]
>
> It's the Department of Homeland Security.  Or did you
> mean the federal Transportation Security Agency?

You're right - I just repeated his term. Oh well, the criticism pretty
much applies so generally, that it doesn't matter precisely what
agency we're talking about.

> Obviously, you're not in the "intelligent Americans" group,
> Wolfy.  Sorry.

That can not be surmised from just one non-logical mistake.

> As for what might have left you "amazed," well consider
> this: you're yammering about Americans who elected
> Barack Hussein Obama, who elected bill clinton twice,
> who almost elected algore, and when casting votes to
> choose the nominee of the less irresponsible of the two
> incumbent parties in America, made George W. Bush
> their top choice for little reason other than name-ID.
>
> You're shocked that a majority moron America is treated
> like morons by its own government?  One of those morons
> you're prattling on about is _you._

Yes, most people are stupid, and what else is new? The bureaucratic
police state, though, is new, and deserves attention.

Andrew Usher

Andrew Usher

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:25:37 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 12:00 am, "Society" <Soci...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:

> > I'm amazed that intelligent Americans actually believe
> > that the Homeland Security Agency can protect us
> > from terrorist attacks. [...]
>
> It's the Department of Homeland Security. Or did you
> mean the federal Transportation Security Agency?

You're right - I just repeated his term. Oh well, the criticism pretty


much applies so generally, that it doesn't matter precisely what
agency we're talking about.

> Obviously, you're not in the "intelligent Americans" group,
> Wolfy. Sorry.

That can not be surmised from just one non-logical mistake.

> As for what might have left you "amazed," well consider


> this: you're yammering about Americans who elected
> Barack Hussein Obama, who elected bill clinton twice,
> who almost elected algore, and when casting votes to
> choose the nominee of the less irresponsible of the two
> incumbent parties in America, made George W. Bush
> their top choice for little reason other than name-ID.
>
> You're shocked that a majority moron America is treated
> like morons by its own government? One of those morons
> you're prattling on about is _you._

Yes, most people are stupid, and what else is new? The bureaucratic

PolishKnight

unread,
Jan 9, 2010, 10:05:59 PM1/9/10
to
In article <9oW%m.1079$5m....@newsfe12.iad>,
"Society" <Soc...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:

> "Wolfy" <werewo...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:0oSdnR_T9N5zNqLW...@earthlink.com...
> >
> > I'm amazed that intelligent Americans actually believe
> > that the Homeland Security Agency can protect us
> > from terrorist attacks. [...]
>
> It's the Department of Homeland Security. Or did you
> mean the federal Transportation Security Agency?
>
> Obviously, you're not in the "intelligent Americans" group,
> Wolfy. Sorry.
>
> As for what might have left you "amazed," well consider
> this: you're yammering about Americans who elected
> Barack Hussein Obama, who elected bill clinton twice,
> who almost elected algore, and when casting votes to
> choose the nominee of the less irresponsible of the two
> incumbent parties in America, made George W. Bush
> their top choice for little reason other than name-ID.
>
> You're shocked that a majority moron America is treated
> like morons by its own government? One of those morons
> you're prattling on about is _you._

Society, what you are referring to above, choosing between the lesser of
two evils, is analogous to a loaded question.

Let's review: McCain's daughter practically voted for Obama (and thinks
that's how the Republican party should reform itself) and McCain
suspended his campaign to go on a lovefest with Obama to pass a trillion
dollar bailout that Obama now blames on GW.

Bleah!

Next, there's Dole who was a washington insider with a wife who prided
herself on forcing us to wear seat belts so the automakers wouldn't be
required to put in airbags and THEN forcing the automakers to put in
airbags ANYWAY! Oh, and the 21 year old drinking age limit via
controlled extortion (take away money from the taxpayers and give it to
the states and then dictate to them the laws for the WHOLE state about
driving even on state roads.) Doesn't that seem unconstitutional?

Next, there's GH Bush, Mr. "Read my lips, I'll raise taxes AND
spending!" and looked the other way at liberal nonsense.

Much of the reason why we're stuck with these rather boring,
conventional, "go along to get along" politicians is because few
politicians are able to be conservative and handle the PC blast they
would recieve in the media. Unless there's an immediate crisis created
by a total commie (such as Jimmy Carter), it's hard to get a straight
talker conservative through the primary system.

Plus, McCain's "campaign finance reform" helped to make it harder for
such a candidate to get funding...

It appears we are going through an interesting time in American history
where the fabian "boil the frog" game has been changed to a high powered
microwave oven. A few trillion here or there and we're talking real
money to paraphrase Reagan. Oh, higher health care costs WITHOUT
socialism! Amazing!

regards,
PolishKnight

lorad

unread,
Jan 10, 2010, 12:26:45 AM1/10/10
to
On Jan 9, 7:05 pm, PolishKnight <marek1...@comcast.net> wrote:
> In article <9oW%m.1079$5m....@newsfe12.iad>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  "Society" <Soci...@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
> > "Wolfy" <werewolfk...@earthlink.net> wrote in message

Some good points..
But mostly you are caught up in the whacky idea that there is a
significant difference between republicans and democrats.

A quick review of recent history shows that both parties serve rich,
anti-democratic interests... and any small bones they throw to the
average citizens.. they throw just to remain in power.


0 new messages