---------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/yeejrpm
All 3 Major Domestic Terror Attacks of 2009 Were Directly Enabled by
Obama’s Reverse-Profiling Orders, Exempting Muslims from Scrutiny
[Reader Post]
Posted by: Alec Rawls @ 1:24 pm in American Intelligence, Barack
Obama, Fanatical Islam, Middle East, War On Terror | 641 views
An anonymous State Department employee, talking to The American
Spectator about Flight 253 and underwear bomber Umar Farouk
Abdulmutallab:
This employee says that despite statements from the Obama
Administration, such information [that Abdulmutallab had been banned
from Britain] was flagged and given higher priority during the Bush
Administration, but that since the changeover “we are encouraged to
not create the appearance that we are profiling or targeting Muslims.”
If this statement is accurate, it makes Obama directly responsible for
Abdulmutallab’s success in spiriting a bomb aboard Flight 253, and the
statement is easily believable, given STRATFOR’s report last June
about intelligence agencies being ordered to stop investigating Black
Muslims:
Several weeks ago, STRATFOR heard from sources that the FBI and
other law enforcement organizations had been ordered to “back off” of
counterterrorism investigations into the activities of Black Muslim
converts.
This was just before 23 year old Black Muslim convert Abdulhakim
Mujahid Muhammad shot two soldiers at an Army recruiting station in
Little Rock. The FBI had opened an investigation of Muhammad after he
returned from Yemen with a phony Yemeni passport, yet he was
apparently off the radar screen when he murdered one soldier and
critically wounded another. Obama’s “back off” order may well have
contributed to Muhammad having a free hand.
In the Fort Hood case, our intelligence agencies intercepted Major
Nidal Hasan’s discussions with top al Qaeda recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki
about killing American soldiers, then they stopped investigating on
the grounds that mere discussion is protected free speech:
U.S. officials now confirm Hasan sent as many as 20 e-mails to
Awlaki. Authorities intercepted the e-mails but later deemed them
innocent or protected by the first amendment.
Innocent OR protected. i.e. Not entirely innocent. Sorta like:
Dear Osama bin Laden:
What do you think of the merits of a bomb attack on Fort Hood vs.
a small arms attack? Killing the infidels one at a time affords more
opportunities to shout “Allahu akbar,” and did you know that since
President Clinton, military bases in the United States are gun-free
zones? Very useful information.
Don’t worry about them reading your reply. Obama promises not to
pay attention.
Your biggest admirer,
Major Nidal Hasan
Fort Hood Texas
The Hasan case was dropped at roughly the same time as the order to
back off of Black Muslims (sometime in mid-09) suggesting that the
order not to investigate Muslims might have extended to Muslims in
general. This fits with Obama’s promise that he would:
…stand with [Muslim Americans] should the political winds shift in
an ugly direction.
Barack and his wife think America has ALWAYS been ugly, “downright
mean,” etcetera, towards blacks, Muslims and other “minorities.” So on
this promise at least Obama is being true to his word. He is siding
with the Muslims. He’s not being neutral. He is not asking our
intelligence agencies to follow the evidence wherever it leads. He is
specifically asking them to exempt from scrutiny the only people who
are attacking us.
Obama is enabling suicide-killers, but draws the line at political
suicide
As the consequences of exempting Muslims from scrutiny break into the
open, Obama is having to backtrack. Having opened the gates to jihad
at one end, he now has no choice but to try to slam them shut at the
other by actually singling out people from Muslim countries (and Cuba)
for airline searches. Apparently it dawned on him that allowing waves
of repatriated Yemeni terrorists to murder planeloads of Americans was
political suicide.
Assuming that Obama is still ordering our intelligence agencies not to
investigate Muslims, we are now operating under a bizarre combination
of profiling and reverse-profiling. At the fundamental level, we are
giving Muslims a pass, then trying to contain the disaster by
profiling at the palliative Transportation Safety level.
President Bush did just the opposite. He was politically correct in
his own way, letting Norman Mineta, an anti-profiling ideologue, set
his transportation safety policies. But political reality will only
tolerate so much failure in protecting the American people from Muslim
terrorists. Thus Bush had to compensate for his failure to use the
most efficient tools by being very diligent.
Obama has chosen to be the opposite of diligent, actually giving
Muslims a pass even when they are implicated, with the ironic result
that he is unable to eschew profiling at the street level the way Bush
did.
If this breaks the taboo on profiling, it may ironically turn out to
be a silver lining. By taking political correctness to its the most
perverse extreme, Obama may have inadvertently shattered its facade of
reasonableness.
----You're a gutless coward who refuses to serve his country.....
inpeach Odumba!
----You're a gutless coward who refuses to serve his country.....
and a glory hole commando to boot....
Three terrorist attacks in the US in 2009? When the fuck did these
happen? Are you flashing back to the Boosh regime, when we had a
multitude of terror attacks including the worst ever on 9/11, which
Guiliani seems to have forgotten about even though he was there?
************************************
Have you been in a coma?
No. But you have been under the influence of stupid.
----Nah.....I love hounding rightard cowards like you....