Re: Fact-Checking Trump?s Lie-filled Tweetstorm About the Mueller Probe

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 05:44:18 -0700 (PDT), ed...@post.com says...

> > Why would any rational person accept a "fact check" on President Trump's
> > words from any "main stream" media source?
>
>
> Why would any rational person think you just asked anything worth listening to?
>

Uhhh... YOU, stupid... by responding to it.

You really aren't as smart as you think you are... stupid.

--

Wanna make a Conservative mad? Tell him a lie.

Wanna make a Liberal mad? Tell him the truth about shithole countries
where most of their voters are from.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:47:16 -0500, Lee says...

> > Why would any rational person accept a "fact check" on President
> > Trump's words from any "main stream" media source?
>
>

> What source to you have showing
> any part of it is wrong?
>

It's an OPINION piece, you idiot. Trump is speaking about Mueller not
finding any crimes an TRUMP, you dumb ass, not the aids who have been
caught in FINANCIAL trouble.

"So far, four former Trump campaign aides have been charged with FINANCIAL
CRIMES or with lying to the FBI, and three of them have pleaded guilty and
agreed to assist in Mueller's investigation." - AP

None of which, have ANYTHING to DO with RUSSIAN collusion, since there is
none. If there was, wouldn't Mueller have said as much, or is he going to
wait another year and a half to spring it on us, meanwhile wasting tax
payer money to go after politicians who lie?

THAT'S going to be a lonnnnnnng investigation. They ALL lie.

It's not rational to link Trump to Russia, JUST because some aids got
caught lying to the FBI about UNRELATED issues.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 05:44:18 -0700 (PDT), ed...@post.com says...

> > Why would any rational person accept a "fact check" on President Trump's
> > words from any "main stream" media source?
>
>

> Why would any rational person think you just asked anything worth listening to?
>

[M.I.Wakefield]

"AlleyCat" wrote in message
news:MPG.351a1b559...@news.eternal-september.org...

> "So far, four former Trump campaign aides have been charged with FINANCIAL
> CRIMES or with lying to the FBI, and three of them have pleaded guilty and
> agreed to assist in Mueller's investigation." - AP

> None of which, have ANYTHING to DO with RUSSIAN collusion, since there is
> none.

But what they lied about was their communications with Russians.

And of course there was collusion with the Russians. Collusion was the
whole point of the Trump Tower meeting with Fredo, Kushner, Manafort, and a
bunch of Russian agents.

> If there was, wouldn't Mueller have said as much, or is he going to wait
> another year and a half to spring it on us, meanwhile wasting tax payer
> money to go after politicians who lie?
> THAT'S going to be a lonnnnnnng investigation. They ALL lie.

How many complaints did you make about the length of Benghazi
investigations, which yielded far less than Mueller has in only 10 months?

And remember Whitewater? That investigation started in January, 1994, and
wrapped up in 2002. Can you imagine Trump's reaction if he ever complains
about how long Mueller is taking, and someone drops that fact on him?

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:13:38 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > None of which, have ANYTHING to DO with RUSSIAN collusion, since there is
> > none.
>
> But what they lied about was their communications with Russians.

That could have JUST as easily been with ANY country having sanctions
against them. Iran, Iraq, NoKo... anyone. But nooooo... the democrats and
to make excuses for Hiterly losing.

And why charge them with "financial misdeeds" only, if it had something to
do with "collusion"? Where's the smoking gun?

"According to the charge announced Friday and a court filing dated
November 30, Flynn made false statements to FBI agents on January 24.
During that meeting, he lied about a conversation he had with the Russian
ambassador on December 22, 2016. He told the agents that he "did not ask
the Russian Ambassador to delay the vote on or defeat a pending United
Nations Security Council resolution," and that the ambassador didn't tell
Flynn about Russia's response to the request. The Washington Post reported
in February that Flynn denied discussing sanctions against Russia with the
ambassador." - Newsweek

Now, WHAT does that have to do with Trump/Russian election collusion?

Nothing.

What "pending United Nations Security Council resolution" has to do with
the 2016 Presidential election?

Fail.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:13:38 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> And of course there was collusion with the Russians. Collusion was the
> whole point of the Trump Tower meeting with Fredo, Kushner, Manafort, and a
> bunch of Russian agents.
>

Uh... WHAT "bunch of Russian agents"?

What became of and came out of this meeting?

Be specific. Were YOU there? Does the FBI have transcripts?

[M.I.Wakefield]

"AlleyCat" wrote in message
news:MPG.351a335ab...@news.eternal-september.org...

> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:13:38 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > > None of which, have ANYTHING to DO with RUSSIAN collusion, since there
> > > is none.
> >
> > But what they lied about was their communications with Russians.

> That could have JUST as easily been with ANY country having sanctions
> against them. Iran, Iraq, NoKo... anyone. But nooooo... the democrats and
> to make excuses for Hiterly losing.

But they weren't ... it was always Russia ... Jared and Russia ... Fredo and
Russia ... Flynn and Russia ... Manafort and Russia ... Sessions and Russia
... Papadopoulos and Russia ... Page and Russia.

> And why charge them with "financial misdeeds" only, if it had something to
> do with "collusion"?

Mueller's not done yet.

> Where's the smoking gun?

The Trump Tower meeting, in and of itself, was collusion. It was the
smoking gun, the trail of blood, and a body wrapped in a Russian flag.

[M.I.Wakefield]

"AlleyCat" wrote in message
news:MPG.351a33c23...@news.eternal-september.org...

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:13:38 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > And of course there was collusion with the Russians. Collusion was the
> > whole point of the Trump Tower meeting with Fredo, Kushner, Manafort,
> > and a bunch of Russian agents.

> Uh... WHAT "bunch of Russian agents"?

You think that a group of random Russians just happened to appear at Trump
Tower for a meeting? If you were any more naive you wouldn't be allowed out
without adult supervision.

> What became of and came out of this meeting?
> Be specific. Were YOU there? Does the FBI have transcripts?

It doesn't matter. The meeting in and of itself was a crime.

A crime by the Russians - 11 CFR 110.20 (b):

A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or
a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly
promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any
Federal, State, or local election.

And a crime by at least Fredo - 11 CFR 110.20 (g):

No person shall knowingly solicit, accept, or receive from a foreign
national any contribution or donation prohibited by paragraphs (b) through
(d) of this section.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:37:24 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution
or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly
promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any
Federal, State, or local election.

No person shall knowingly solicit, accept, or receive from a foreign
national any contribution or donation prohibited by paragraphs (b) through
(d) of this section.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You think Russians gave money to the Clinton Foundation, to help Haiti?

No, it was to "help" the Clintons, any way they could. ;-)

=====

For well over a year now, the progressive left in the Democratic Party
have tried hard to sell the idea that, a) Russia meddled in our election,
and, b) that it was to the detriment of Hillary Clinton. After nearly a
year and a half of investigating, neither appears true. What is true, and
now documented, is that Hillary Clinton and her family foundation both
benefited handsomely from Russian corruption.

Citing federal officials and government documents, The Hill details the
Russians' nuclear-industry corruption here in the U.S., citing extensive
evidence that "Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery,
kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir
Putin's atomic energy business" in the U.S.

But that's just the beginning. Based on both an eyewitness account and
documents, The Hill report goes on to say that federal agents found
evidence "indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of
dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's
charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow."

Isn't that called bribery?

Strangely, the Department of Justice first discovered the Russian
racketeering scheme and the links to Clinton in 2009. But it failed to
bring charges, and dragged its investigation out for four years with no
substantive action.

Meanwhile, in October of 2010, the State Department and the inter-agency
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) curiously -
and unanimously - approved the sale of part of Uranium One, a Canadian-
based company with uranium interests in the U.S., to Rosatom, a Russian
state holding company.

Why is this significant? That sale gave Russia, a potential nuclear foe,
defacto control over 20% of the U.S.' uranium supply. Let that sink in for
a minute.

Then there's this: The CFIUS that approved the Rosatom deal had two key
members: Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who in a clear conflict
of interest materially benefited from the deal, and Attorney General Eric
Holder, the man responsible for slow-walking the investigation into
Russian nuclear racketeering.

So the Obama administration knew of the Russian racketeering, extortion,
money laundering, and the rest, as Vladimir Putin's minions elbowed their
way into the U.S. nuclear market. The Obama administration did nothing.
The administration knew, too, that Hillary was selling access and
influence in the State Department via donations to the family charity.
But, again, it did nothing.

And these donations weren't just peanuts.

The Clintons and their foundation raked in a cool $145 million in
donations and "speaking fees" just from Uranium One- and Rosatom-
affiliated donors while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was supposedly
keeping all Clinton Foundation business at "arm's-length." As we reported
in July, Clinton official emails show extensive connections between
Hillary, the Clinton Foundation and donors during her time as secretary of
state, a kind of criminal conga-line of people asking for favors from
Hillary and donating to the foundation.

Peter Schwiezer, the author of "Clinton Cash," questioned this
"spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium
One" who "decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of
dollars to the Clinton Foundation."

Nor was this just a Russian thing. It was a much-broader pay-for-play
scheme by Hillary Clinton. Consider this: Of the 154 private interests
that were given official access to Hillary Clinton during her tenure at
the State Department, at least 85 donated to the Clinton Foundation or a
program affiliated with it. The secretary of state's office in Foggy
Bottom might as well have had "For Sale" painted on it.

That the Clintons and their eponymous foundation got away with their
corrupt arrangement for so many years without interference or censure
speaks to a deep political corruption in the Obama administration. It's
strange that an investigation continues into the inconsequential ties
between the Donald Trump campaign and Russian officials, while solid
evidence of bribery of the Clinton family by the Russians and many others
is completely ignored.

[AlleyCat]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:30:57 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > That could have JUST as easily been with ANY country having sanctions
> > against them. Iran, Iraq, NoKo... anyone. But nooooo... the democrats and
> > to make excuses for Hiterly losing.
>
> But they weren't ... it was always Russia ... Jared and Russia ... Fredo and
> Russia ... Flynn and Russia ... Manafort and Russia ... Sessions and Russia
> ... Papadopoulos and Russia ... Page and Russia.

Are you fucking kidding me? Do you really think that NO ONE from the Obama
administration EVER talked with ANYONE from Russia in the 8 years they
were in power?

Hmmmm...

Obama:

https://poetryfromtheheartofamerica.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/russian-
amb-obama-jpej.jpg?w=620

https://www.glocktalk.com/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Ftruthfeed.com%2Fwp-
content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F06%2Fclinton-hillary-russia-uranium-
FACEBOOK.jpg&hash=cd72fb1b4e105d3298ee8c556c4e741d

https://www.glocktalk.com/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%
2Flegalinsurrection.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F10%2FObama-and-
Russian-President-Dmitry-Medvedev-in-Seoul-Korea-2012-620x347.jpg&hash=
7c597a9a44a8223d6d63a8b83a7dc22b

https://c.o0bg.com/rf/image_835w/Boston/2011-
2020/2016/12/30/BostonGlobe.com/National/Images/c01740f9ad7047279f873016fc
f28f47-c01740f9ad7047279f873016fcf28f47-0.jpg

http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newsweek.com/files/styles/lg/public/2017/0
5/11/obama-putin.jpg

http://c7.alamy.com/comp/E789MR/president-barack-obama-meets-with-john-f-
tefft-us-ambassador-to-russia-E789MR.jpg

https://rwcnews.com/wp-content/uploads/russian-ambassador-visited-obama-6-
times-during-hillary-uranium-to-russia-scandal.jpg

Clinton:

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170302123727-01-hillary-clinton-
sergey-lavrov-reset-button-restricted-exlarge-169.jpg

https://cdn.img.inosmi.ru/images/23791/38/237913892.jpg

https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/d2dde10/2147483647/resize/1160x%
3E/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-origin-images.politico.com%2F2012%2F07%
2F120703_2_hillary_clinton_in_russia_328.jpg

https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/8b68030/2147483647/resize/1160x%
3E/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-origin-images.politico.com%2F2012%2F07%
2F120703_6_hillary_clinton_in_russia_328.jpg

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/09/Vladimir-Putin-Hillary-Clinton-
AP-640x480.jpg

https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/a1ff2d4/2147483647/resize/1160x/
quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2Fde%2F87%
2F3dedabaa437fa4b6db035837d3a6%2F150909-clinton-putin-ap-1160.jpg

[M.I.Wakefield]

"AlleyCat" wrote in message
news:MPG.351aaec7c...@news.eternal-september.org...

> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:37:24 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a
> > contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or
> > expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in
> > connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

> > No person shall knowingly solicit, accept, or receive from a foreign
> > national any contribution or donation prohibited by paragraphs (b)
> > through (d) of this section.

> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

> You think Russians gave money to the Clinton Foundation, to help Haiti?
> No, it was to "help" the Clintons, any way they could. ;-)

The Clinton Foundation is a registered charity, given high marks for
accountability and transparency.

Donald Trump still hasn't released his taxes ... well, except involuntarily
to the Mueller team.

[M.I.Wakefield]

"AlleyCat" wrote in message
news:MPG.351aaf005...@news.eternal-september.org...

> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:30:57 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > > That could have JUST as easily been with ANY country having sanctions
> > > against them. Iran, Iraq, NoKo... anyone. But nooooo... the democrats
> > > and to make excuses for Hiterly losing.
> >
> > But they weren't ... it was always Russia ... Jared and Russia ... Fredo
> > and Russia ... Flynn and Russia ... Manafort and Russia ... Sessions and
> > Russia ... Papadopoulos and Russia ... Page and Russia.

> Are you fucking kidding me? Do you really think that NO ONE from the Obama
> administration EVER talked with ANYONE from Russia in the 8 years they
> were in power?

The point is that those Russia contacts weren't during the Trump
administration, they were during the campaign: There's a difference.

[AlleyCat]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:52:13 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > You think Russians gave money to the Clinton Foundation, to help Haiti?
> > No, it was to "help" the Clintons, any way they could. ;-)
>
> The Clinton Foundation is a registered charity, given high marks for
> accountability and transparency.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

OoooooWEEEE... thanks for that. Been sort of a rough day. Whoo, let me
catch my breath... I haven't laughed like that in a lonnnnng time.

> Donald Trump still hasn't released his taxes ... well, except involuntarily
> to the Mueller team.

Ohhhh... so he's guilty of something, because WE haven't see his returns,
huh? And since Mueller HAS seen them, he's waiting for the "opportune"
time to release them, huh, so he can what, make Trump sweat?

LOL... you libtards and your conspiraCEEEES. Do you see dead people too?

The ONLY reason you keep up this bullshit, is to disrupt the Trump
administration... you have NO proof of anything, so you just keep yapping
like an over-bred Chihuahua, and the media just goes right on along,
because those faggots and you, are just a bunch of butt-hurt snowflakes,
who can't seem to grasp the idea, that your homo agendas aren't agreed
upon by the VAST majority of the people of the world.

Which makes the statements in my signature and your subsequent feelings,
all the more perplexing.

--

STILL can't understand why liberals are so in love with Muslims.

Muslims are against abortion.

Muslims are against contraception.

Muslims are against pre-marital sex.

Muslims are FOR killing homosexuals.

Muslims are FOR treating women as slaves and chattel.

Muslims are FOR old men raping little boys.

Muslims HATE you.

STILL can't understand why liberals are so in love with Muslims.

Oh yeah... their Messiah, Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim. ;-)

[AlleyCat]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:43:02 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > Are you fucking kidding me? Do you really think that NO ONE from the Obama
> > administration EVER talked with ANYONE from Russia in the 8 years they
> > were in power?
>
> The point is that those Russia contacts weren't during the Trump
> administration, they were during the campaign: There's a difference.
>

Ohhhhh... so there was NO contact with the Russians made within the Obama
transition team before he was sworn in the first time? Gotcha.

I make the distinction between before his "1st inauguration" and after,
because well, we ALL know that before he was elected again, he uttered
THESE words: "This is my last election... After my election I have more
flexibility."

Snopes: True

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-more-flexibility-russia/

So, you're telling me that, without a shadow of a doubt, that NO ONE in
the Obama transition team, or the Democrat Party, called, wrote, emailed,
or saw ANYONE from Russia, in the months after, or even before the
election, leading up to his inauguration?

Wow... you must REALLY have the pulse of Washington running through your
veins, I mean, to KNOW something no one else seems to know, is just beyond
supernatural... you REALLY ought to be in Washington... I'm sure someone
can give you special dispensation for being a Cuntnadian. ;-)

Question: HOW did Obama KNOW he was going to win?

Did HE collude with "Vlad" in "meddling" with our election process,
because after all, we all KNOW Russia has been meddling in our election
process for DECADES?

Did the Democrats KNOW how to hack the "ballot boxes" back then, then LOSE
that ability?

Why did the Democrat Election War Machine make SURE that Obama won, when
Hillary was clearly the front-runner, until...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGZFgMNM-UU

Why, all of a sudden, are we blaming Russian meddling on the current
administration, and Trump in particular, when Obama and the Democrat LET
them do it?

Because, like Tom Sr. and Lee Lee the Wee Wee Wrangler, you're just
another pansy-ass butt-hurt wittle snowflake liberal. I don't CARE what
country you're from. And yes, while we're at it... WHY do you care so much
for U.S. politics?

Is it payback for someone going into ont. or can.politics

Tee hee... juvenile.

[AlleyCat]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:43:02 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > Are you fucking kidding me? Do you really think that NO ONE from the Obama
> > administration EVER talked with ANYONE from Russia in the 8 years they
> > were in power?
>
> The point is that those Russia contacts weren't during the Trump
> administration, they were during the campaign: There's a difference.
>

I'll rephrase...

Are you fucking kidding me? Do you really think that NO ONE from the Obama

transition team or "pre-administration" EVER talked with ANYONE from
Russia BEFORE being sworn into office? Riiiiight. (see below)

=====

Excerpts from an explanatory website that explains WHY presidential
transition teams might contact other countries BEFORE an election:

"First, some general observations. The U.S. has been the major actor on
the world stage for 70 years and almost every policy statement we make and
position we take has a global impact."

"So WELL before the actual election, every country, friend, foe or
neutral, follows a presidential election campaign with great interest,
hoping to divine what it means for them. And, as we've seen, some
countries may try to influence our elections."

"By that I mean actions BEYOND Russia's overt efforts this time. If North
Korea tests a nuclear weapon or a missile during our campaign, candidates
have to take positions on it. Ditto if there is a revolution or terrorist
incident."

"Once the election is over the media begin drawing conclusions even before
the president-elect makes any policy statements. So almost immediately Mr.
Trump's election was taken as endorsement by the American people of the
Brexit campaign in Great Britain, improved chances for Ms. LePen in
France, Russian politics, and a new dawn for conservative nationalism
elsewhere in Europe."

=====

Below:

"Outgoing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had assembled a coalition of
six states - the United Kingdom, France, Germany, RUSSIA, China, and the
United States-to confront Iran." (WHAAAAAAT? The Obama team had to talk
to Russia, about Iran??? Say it ain't so, Joe.)

"In addition, Obama formulated a policy to deal with the U.S. missile
defense shield that was under construction in Poland. HE DISCUSSED THE
MATTER WITH BOTH POLISH PRESIDENT LECH KACZYNSKI AND RUSSIAN PRESIDENT
DMITRY MEDVEDEV."

Soooo... Trump or his team talking with Russians, bad... Obama team
talking with Russians, good.

Gotcha. ;-)

Liberal whine: "Bu bu bu bu but Truuuummmmp's teeeam was colluuuuuding to
winnnn the electionnnnn."

Riiiiight... HOW did they DO that, by the way?

[M.I.Wakefield]

"AlleyCat" wrote in message
news:MPG.351b714cd...@news.eternal-september.org...

>On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:43:02 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > The point is that those Russia contacts weren't during the Trump
> > administration, they were during the campaign: There's a difference.

> Ohhhhh... so there was NO contact with the Russians made within the Obama
> transition team before he was sworn in the first time? Gotcha.

Yep. That's the case.

"This story just gets weirder and weirder. During Obama transition in 2008
(I was his Russia advisor back then ) we met with 0 Russians. 0"
- Michael McFaul, later US Ambassador to Russia.

[AlleyCat]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:03:15 -0400, M.I.Wakefield says...

> > Ohhhhh... so there was NO contact with the Russians made within the Obama
> > transition team before he was sworn in the first time? Gotcha.
>
> Yep. That's the case.
>
> "This story just gets weirder and weirder. During Obama transition in 2008
> (I was his Russia advisor back then ) we met with 0 Russians. 0"
> - Michael McFaul, later US Ambassador to Russia.

What's this "we" shit, Kemosabe? He got a mouse in his pocket?

So, Michael McFail, knows what EVERYONE in Obama's transition team was
doing... EVERYONE? I love it how ONE person in the Democrat Party ALWAYS
knows EVERYTHING and what EVERYONE is doing or not doing.

Ahhhh... so HE'S telling the truth, and everyone else, as far as Trump is
concerned, is lying.

A California Democrat... ah, no... no way... he'd NEVER lie. Never.

That's bullshit and you KNOW it. The incoming President HAS to get in
contact with foreign governments as a matter of protocol. You don't ignore
the Russians... ever, and if someone has said that there were "zero"
meetings or calls to Russia or Russian diplomats, they're lying.

You believe THAT bullshit, and I have a bridge to sell ya.

THAT he was the "Russian Advisor", means what, exactly? That he knows
EVERYTHING about who or what's going on in regard to Russia?

Riiiiight.

[NoBody]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:03:15 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com>
wrote:

You deleted the proof that showed you were wrong. Typical.

[NoBody]

<crickets.wav>

[M.I.Wakefield]

"NoBody" wrote in message
news:pc47bdhgm6a53m0sb...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 06:35:53 -0400, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:

> >On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:03:15 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield" <no...@present.com>
> >wrote:

> >>"This story just gets weirder and weirder. During Obama transition in
> >>2008 (I was his Russia advisor back then ) we met with 0 Russians. 0"
> >>- Michael McFaul, later US Ambassador to Russia.
> >
> >You deleted the proof that showed you were wrong. Typical.

I didn't, because there wasn't.

> <crickets.wav>

Yeah ... how's the "baseless speculation" argument working out for you,
tin-foil boy?