Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

....Clinton is a ssssSSSSSSSSSnake.......

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Beer is Good Food

unread,
Sep 24, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/24/98
to
In article <360b069a...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>,
tsi...@bellsouth.net says...
>
> Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
> justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
> and oral-anal sex.

Oral-anal sex? I guess I'll have to get out the stroking material
(Starr's Report) again. I missed that the first time.

In any event: It was Starr was the one who wrote the report. It was the
Republican Judiciary Committee and the Republican Congress that released
the report. It was Starr's attorneys that asked the questions that
produced the grand jury testimony that the media ran unedited on their
stations.

Bill Clinton has not caused anyone to hear this.

> There is nothing this snake will not do to save his slithering, slimy
> little tail. NOTHING.
>
> Think about your young sons.
>
>
> Democrats are Dirty.......
> Remember come November......
>
> tt
>

tsi...@bellsouth.net

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to

Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
and oral-anal sex.

There is nothing this snake will not do to save his slithering, slimy

Pixie

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to
beer_...@hotmail.com (Beer is Good Food) wrote:

>> Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
>> justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
>> and oral-anal sex.
>

>Oral-anal sex? I guess I'll have to get out the stroking material
>(Starr's Report) again. I missed that the first time.
>
>In any event: It was Starr was the one who wrote the report. It was the
>Republican Judiciary Committee and the Republican Congress that released
>the report. It was Starr's attorneys that asked the questions that
>produced the grand jury testimony that the media ran unedited on their
>stations.
>
>Bill Clinton has not caused anyone to hear this.
>

Right.. Other than bring total disgrace on himself, his family and the office to
which he was elected.. Of course that's immaterial in the grand scheme of
things, right?

Your logic in blaming others for Slick Willy's actions is beyond comprehension.

Edward William Clayton

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to
Pixie (gre...@hotmail.com) wrote:

Clinton and Lewinsky are responsible for what they did. Starr's the one
responsible for his investigation. And the Republican controlled
Judiciary Committee and Congress are responsible for what they released
and in what format.

: Your logic in blaming others for Slick Willy's actions is beyond comprehension.

It does not excuse his actions and decisions to criticize Starr and the
Republicans for their actions and decisions. Voters are qualified to
judge both, and to condemn both, if they wish.

Incidentally there's a new poll out showing increasing condemnation of the
Republicans:

"By a clear majority, Americans said they disapproved of how the Judiciary
Committee has handled the matter. While committee members said they
released the videotape for the public's benefit, 78 percent of all
Americans, and 65 percent of Republicans, said it should never have been
released.

People said they objected to the committee's prying into what they regard
as a private family matter and that it was unnecessary to make public
salacious details about sex. In addition, 65 percent of Americans said
Republicans in Congress were unfairly trying to weaken the president and
the Democrats. Thirty-nine percent of Republicans saw it that way as
well."

Stop by the New York Times site and check it out.

Ted


Tarver Engineering

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to

Beer is Good Food wrote in message ...

>In article <360b069a...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>,
>tsi...@bellsouth.net says...
>>
>> Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
>> justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
>> and oral-anal sex.
>
>Oral-anal sex? I guess I'll have to get out the stroking material
>(Starr's Report) again. I missed that the first time.

You must have missed the 2800 pages released Monday.

>In any event: It was Starr was the one who wrote the report. It was the
>Republican Judiciary Committee and the Republican Congress that released
>the report. It was Starr's attorneys that asked the questions that
>produced the grand jury testimony that the media ran unedited on their
>stations.


The release of the report was a bi-partisan effort. The spin doctors are
completely clueless. (or hope you are)

>Bill Clinton has not caused anyone to hear this.


He did it all and lied about it, that is why we are getting all this
information. No one is forcing you to read it.

It would be in the best interest of the Republican party to quit listening
to liars.

John

Democrats are liars
Remember come November


Mosl Roland

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to
<tsi...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
360b069a...@news.atl.bellsouth.net...

>Think about your young sons.

They will learn it in history:

There was a professional liar.
He was so evil,
he even defended tobacco industry
causing so many people to die by cancer

And this liar had been used by a right radical
party to make a big attack against the very
popular president.
His task was to make the people think,
that they have a bad president.

But he completly failed.

Mosl Roland
http://pege.org/ clear targets for a confused civilization
http://salzburgs.com/ (did not find a slogan :-)

tsi...@bellsouth.net

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 14:22:52 GMT, tcla...@umich.edu (Edward William
Clayton) wrote:

>Pixie (gre...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>: beer_...@hotmail.com (Beer is Good Food) wrote:
>

>: >In article <360b069a...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>,

>: >tsi...@bellsouth.net says...
>: >>
>: >> Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
>: >> justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
>: >> and oral-anal sex.
>: >
>: >Oral-anal sex? I guess I'll have to get out the stroking material
>: >(Starr's Report) again. I missed that the first time.

>: >
>: >In any event: It was Starr was the one who wrote the report. It was the

>: >Republican Judiciary Committee and the Republican Congress that released
>: >the report. It was Starr's attorneys that asked the questions that
>: >produced the grand jury testimony that the media ran unedited on their
>: >stations.

>: >
>: >Bill Clinton has not caused anyone to hear this.
>: >
>
>: Right.. Other than bring total disgrace on himself, his family and the office to
>: which he was elected.. Of course that's immaterial in the grand scheme of
>: things, right?
>
>Clinton and Lewinsky are responsible for what they did. Starr's the one
>responsible for his investigation. And the Republican controlled
>Judiciary Committee and Congress are responsible for what they released
>and in what format.
>


WRONG..............

Star was and is just doing his job (thank God). Starr, Ibelieve, was
approinted by the Attorney General. ( clinton appointed )

It is so refreshing to see someone do their job with efficience and
effectiveness despite the Attacks of the most powerful man in the
world, the liberal democrats, and the liberal press. The man is a
hero. I like to see what kind of report you'd have produce if your
boss had appointed you to investigate the Pres.

tt


>: Your logic in blaming others for Slick Willy's actions is beyond comprehension.
>
>It does not excuse his actions and decisions to criticize Starr and the
>Republicans for their actions and decisions. Voters are qualified to
>judge both, and to condemn both, if they wish.
>
>Incidentally there's a new poll out showing increasing condemnation of the
>Republicans:
>
>"By a clear majority, Americans said they disapproved of how the Judiciary
>Committee has handled the matter. While committee members said they
>released the videotape for the public's benefit, 78 percent of all
>Americans, and 65 percent of Republicans, said it should never have been
>released.
>
>People said they objected to the committee's prying into what they regard
>as a private family matter and that it was unnecessary to make public
>salacious details about sex. In addition, 65 percent of Americans said
>Republicans in Congress were unfairly trying to weaken the president and
>the Democrats. Thirty-nine percent of Republicans saw it that way as
>well."
>
>Stop by the New York Times site and check it out.
>
>Ted
>

Democrats are Dirty.......
Remember come November......

tt

tsi...@bellsouth.net

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:01:23 -0700, "Tarver Engineering"
<jta...@tminet.com> wrote:

>
>Beer is Good Food wrote in message ...

>>In article <360b069a...@news.atl.bellsouth.net>,
>>tsi...@bellsouth.net says...
>>>
>>> Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
>>> justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
>>> and oral-anal sex.
>>
>>Oral-anal sex? I guess I'll have to get out the stroking material
>>(Starr's Report) again. I missed that the first time.
>

>You must have missed the 2800 pages released Monday.


..................It is a known fact that Liberally educated children
and people can not read very well. It was there in the first release
of the Starr Report. But this guy knows full well that the president
gets his ass licked. He and the other liberals do it all the time.
He is just jelous of Monica..........!!

tt


>
>>In any event: It was Starr was the one who wrote the report. It was the
>>Republican Judiciary Committee and the Republican Congress that released
>>the report. It was Starr's attorneys that asked the questions that
>>produced the grand jury testimony that the media ran unedited on their
>>stations.
>
>

>The release of the report was a bi-partisan effort. The spin doctors are
>completely clueless. (or hope you are)
>

>>Bill Clinton has not caused anyone to hear this.
>
>

>He did it all and lied about it, that is why we are getting all this
>information. No one is forcing you to read it.
>
>It would be in the best interest of the Republican party to quit listening
>to liars.
>
>John
>
>Democrats are liars
>Remember come November
>
>
>

Democrats are Dirty.......
Remember come November......

tt

tsi...@bellsouth.net

unread,
Sep 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/25/98
to
Hitler was also very popular. We can see which side you would have
been on if you'd lived in Germany. Some people are just scared to
stand up for what is right. You are one of those spineless wimps.

tt


On Fri, 25 Sep 1998 14:57:37 +0200, "Mosl Roland" <fou...@pege.org>
wrote:

Democrats are Dirty.......
Remember come November......

tt

Mosl Roland

unread,
Sep 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/26/98
to
<tsi...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
360c0c0b....@news.atl.bellsouth.net...

>Hitler was also very popular. We can see which side you would have
>been on if you'd lived in Germany.

No, I always hate right radical leader parties
where You have to leave the brain outside

xkag...@ecr.net

unread,
Sep 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/26/98
to
On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 11:55:39 +0200, "Mosl Roland" <fou...@pege.org>
wrote:

><tsi...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message


>360c0c0b....@news.atl.bellsouth.net...
>>Hitler was also very popular. We can see which side you would have
>>been on if you'd lived in Germany.
>
>No, I always hate right radical leader parties
>where You have to leave the brain outside

Speaking of brains, wasn't Hitler a LEFT radical leader?

National *Socialist*, yep, sounds left to me.

Don

Mosl Roland

unread,
Sep 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/26/98
to
<xkag...@ecr.net> wrote in message 360cdd0b...@news.ecr.net...

If he would have been a sozialist,
he would have been a good friend of Stalin :-)

Read history books :-)

Hitler was total against communism.
He was always a right radical.

He tried to negoziate with the west

"Look, I am practical on Your side,
but we Germans live direct on the border
to the Soviet Union, so we are a border
state in danger, and so, our politic is
a little bit more harsh"

Be happy that Hitler was not a left radical,
because a Hitler Stalin alliance
would have smashed US.

tsi...@bellsouth.net

unread,
Sep 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/26/98
to

Bill Clinton is a writhing serpent spewing his poison on America's
justice system. He is causing out childern to hear about oral sex
and oral-anal sex.

There is nothing this snake will not do to save his slithering, slimy
little tail. NOTHING.

Think about your young sons.


Mosl Roland

unread,
Oct 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/1/98
to
Mark Gibson <gib...@prairienet.org> wrote in message
bInQ1.61$dE1.310848@firefly...

>xkag...@ecr.net wrote:
>>On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 11:55:39 +0200, "Mosl Roland" <fou...@pege.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>><tsi...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>>360c0c0b....@news.atl.bellsouth.net...
>>>>Hitler was also very popular. We can see which side you would have
>>>>been on if you'd lived in Germany.
>>>
>>>No, I always hate right radical leader parties
>>>where You have to leave the brain outside
>>
>>Speaking of brains, wasn't Hitler a LEFT radical leader?
>
>Yes, Hitler was a LEFTIST, FASCIST extremist...just like Bill "Bubba"
>Clinton. It's a good thing that the U.S. governemnt provides plenty
>of checks and balances against Clinton's attempts to become the
>world's next Hitler... (See Executive O.rder 13083!)

Your so unlogical, that it's not possible to discuss this anymore.

But is's also good that You posted this.

It shows how much influence the Republican hate campaign
against Clinton has on less intelligent people.

It show all the danger on the attempt of the Republican hate
campaign to split US society.

0 new messages