Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Treason
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Neal Boortz
May 25, 2012, 1:00:00 PM5/25/12
to
We’ve heard the argument for some time now that voter ID laws are
raaaaacist. But now, not only are these laws racist but they are
treasonous!
Former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat (duh), says that
Republicans are pushing voter ID laws because they don’t have winning
issues and are, instead, relying on changing the rules of the game. But
then she goes on to say, “Efforts to suppress voting are not just
selfish, there not just short-sighted. Voter restriction laws, that lead
to an outcome based upon process instead upon merit, might be labeled –
and I imagine even by our founding fathers – as treasonous.”
You could fill volumes with the idiotic musings of Granholm. The ONLY
way a voter ID law could be voter “suppression” is if you believe that
turning people away from the polls who are not legally entitled to cast
a ballot fits the definition of voter suppression. So what is the issue
here. The facts show that most people who cast illegal ballots cast them
for Democrats. Let’s face it; those who break laws are, as a whole, much
more likely to vote Democrat than Republican. Yeah .... I’m saying that
Republicans are more honorable than Democrats --- deal with it --- and
Democrats don’t like you keeping their illegal voters from casting their
votes.
There you have it, folks. Proving that you are who you say you are in
order to partake in the privilege of voting is treason. Got it?
raaaaacist. But now, not only are these laws racist but they are
treasonous!
Former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat (duh), says that
Republicans are pushing voter ID laws because they don’t have winning
issues and are, instead, relying on changing the rules of the game. But
then she goes on to say, “Efforts to suppress voting are not just
selfish, there not just short-sighted. Voter restriction laws, that lead
to an outcome based upon process instead upon merit, might be labeled –
and I imagine even by our founding fathers – as treasonous.”
You could fill volumes with the idiotic musings of Granholm. The ONLY
way a voter ID law could be voter “suppression” is if you believe that
turning people away from the polls who are not legally entitled to cast
a ballot fits the definition of voter suppression. So what is the issue
here. The facts show that most people who cast illegal ballots cast them
for Democrats. Let’s face it; those who break laws are, as a whole, much
more likely to vote Democrat than Republican. Yeah .... I’m saying that
Republicans are more honorable than Democrats --- deal with it --- and
Democrats don’t like you keeping their illegal voters from casting their
votes.
There you have it, folks. Proving that you are who you say you are in
order to partake in the privilege of voting is treason. Got it?
0 new messages