Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DOMESTIC ENEMY - What is it? Who are they?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Paul Edward Zukowski (PEZ)

unread,
Mar 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/7/00
to
In article <HThx4.61739$Mp2.5...@typhoon2.kc.rr.com>, "JFP"
<blu...@kscable.com> wrote:

$I remember looking through the American Jurisprudence books, ALR, and other
$reference materials for the definition and cases concerning "domestic
$enemies." I was not able to find much of anything on the term. Could it be
$because over the last two hundred years it was next to impossible to
$identify one whose feet fit the shoe? People in government back in the
$early days of our Republic were more concerned about protecting the
$Constitution than tearing it apart. Not so today.
$
$When you look at the oath everyone takes upon entering government service,
$there are words to the effect: "I promise to preserve, protect and defend
$the Constitution of the United States against all enemies both foreign and
$domestic." The President, Senators and Congressmen, etc., take an oath
$similar to this, as well as those in the military. Foreign enemies seemed
$to have been easier to pick out than domestic enemies over the years,
$because it hasn't been until recent times that it has become clear to whom,
$and what, this term refers. It was a problem that was not possible at the
$founding of our country, but it was something that the founders saw was
$possible in the future - and that future is NOW.
$
$"Domestic enemies" of the Constitution. On its face, this would be anyone
$who does the opposite of preserving, protecting and defending the
$Constitution. It sure seems easy to spot a lot of people in Congress who
$fit this classification today. They take that oath and then spend the rest
$of their time in office doing the exact opposite of what they swore to do.
$We have Congressmen and Senators, as well as the President, all of whom are
$directly working to eliminate the rights, freedoms and liberties guaranteed
$under the Bill of Rights to the Constitution, and they are daily proclaiming
$their anti-Constitutional stand boldly before the public.
$
$One thing for sure, if the Constitution is dissolved, then every man, woman
$and child in this country has no rights, freedoms and liberties to claim for
$themselves, as that document is the only thing standing between tyrants and
$the people, guaranteeing those rights, freedoms and liberties.
$
$There is no doubt there are "domestic enemies" within our ranks today. They
$are doing an excellent job of destroying what we had set up for us by our
$founding fathers with those original documents. Anyone else out there have
$some information or thoughts on the term "domestic enemies" and what we can
$do about the problem?

See my post about this.
Class action suit anyone???
PEZ

--
PAUL EDWARD ZUKOWSKI "PEZ"
AS Eastern Conn State Univ. 1992 BA Trinity College 1996
PEZMANS WORLD http://www.freeyellow.com/members8/pez63/index.html
Cleo Literary Society - http://www.trincoll.edu/orgs/cleo/
Windsor Marksman - http://members.aol.com/wmaofct/
Both the Pen & the Sword are powerfull
My Email Addresses are
pzuk...@mail.trincoll.edu pez...@ntplx.net
See me at http://www.allexperts.com

Marksman

unread,
Mar 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/7/00
to

"JFP" <blu...@kscable.com> wrote in message
news:HThx4.61739$Mp2.5...@typhoon2.kc.rr.com...

> I remember looking through the American Jurisprudence books, ALR, and
other
> reference materials for the definition and cases concerning "domestic
> enemies." I was not able to find much of anything on the term. Could it
be
> because over the last two hundred years it was next to impossible to
> identify one whose feet fit the shoe? People in government back in the
> early days of our Republic were more concerned about protecting the
> Constitution than tearing it apart. Not so today.
>
> When you look at the oath everyone takes upon entering government service,
> there are words to the effect: "I promise to preserve, protect and defend
> the Constitution of the United States against all enemies both foreign and
> domestic." The President, Senators and Congressmen, etc., take an oath
> similar to this, as well as those in the military. Foreign enemies seemed
> to have been easier to pick out than domestic enemies over the years,
> because it hasn't been until recent times that it has become clear to
whom,
> and what, this term refers. It was a problem that was not possible at the
> founding of our country, but it was something that the founders saw was
> possible in the future - and that future is NOW.
>
> "Domestic enemies" of the Constitution. On its face, this would be anyone
> who does the opposite of preserving, protecting and defending the
> Constitution. It sure seems easy to spot a lot of people in Congress who
> fit this classification today. They take that oath and then spend the
rest
> of their time in office doing the exact opposite of what they swore to do.
> We have Congressmen and Senators, as well as the President, all of whom
are
> directly working to eliminate the rights, freedoms and liberties
guaranteed
> under the Bill of Rights to the Constitution, and they are daily
proclaiming
> their anti-Constitutional stand boldly before the public.
>
> One thing for sure, if the Constitution is dissolved, then every man,
woman
> and child in this country has no rights, freedoms and liberties to claim
for
> themselves, as that document is the only thing standing between tyrants
and
> the people, guaranteeing those rights, freedoms and liberties.
>
> There is no doubt there are "domestic enemies" within our ranks today.
They
> are doing an excellent job of destroying what we had set up for us by our
> founding fathers with those original documents. Anyone else out there
have
> some information or thoughts on the term "domestic enemies" and what we
can
> do about the problem?


I'd like to see them all locked up and/or shot as traitors to the
Constitution.

Mort

unread,
Mar 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/7/00
to

Websters New Collegiate Dictionary - Domestic Enemy -Definition -
Speedbyrd.et al

-*MORT*-

Paul Edward Zukowski (PEZ)

unread,
Mar 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/7/00
to
In article <wWix4.61772$Mp2.5...@typhoon2.kc.rr.com>, "JFP"
<blu...@kscable.com> wrote:

$Paul Edward Zukowski (PEZ) <pez...@ntplx.net> wrote in message
$news:pezcleo-0703...@p09-41.hartford.dialin.ntplx.com...
$>snip<
$> See my post about this.
$> Class action suit anyone???
$> PEZ
$
$Okay, PEZ. Where is it? I checked the hyperlinks at the bottom of your
$post and used Dogpile but could not find a post on this from you. I want to
$read it. Thanks

The idea was in post Clinton turns my stomac Bromo

JFP

unread,
Mar 8, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/8/00
to

JFP

unread,
Mar 8, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/8/00
to
Paul Edward Zukowski (PEZ) <pez...@ntplx.net> wrote in message
news:pezcleo-0703...@p09-41.hartford.dialin.ntplx.com...
>snip<

> See my post about this.
> Class action suit anyone???
> PEZ

Okay, PEZ. Where is it? I checked the hyperlinks at the bottom of your


post and used Dogpile but could not find a post on this from you. I want to

read it. Thanks


halftoke

unread,
Mar 8, 2000, 3:00:00 AM3/8/00
to

"Mort" <fin...@ispchannel.com> wrote in message
news:FMjx4.12074$jT5.4...@newsin1.ispchannel.com...

>
>
> JFP <blu...@kscable.com> wrote in message
> news:HThx4.61739$Mp2.5...@typhoon2.kc.rr.com...
> Websters New Collegiate Dictionary - Domestic Enemy -Definition -
> Speedbyrd.et al
>
> -*MORT*-
>
>
2 points.


--
Halftoke

"Beware the Government that fears your gun."
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will fight to the death to protect
your right to say it."

0 new messages