$I remember looking through the American Jurisprudence books, ALR, and other
$reference materials for the definition and cases concerning "domestic
$enemies." I was not able to find much of anything on the term. Could it be
$because over the last two hundred years it was next to impossible to
$identify one whose feet fit the shoe? People in government back in the
$early days of our Republic were more concerned about protecting the
$Constitution than tearing it apart. Not so today.
$
$When you look at the oath everyone takes upon entering government service,
$there are words to the effect: "I promise to preserve, protect and defend
$the Constitution of the United States against all enemies both foreign and
$domestic." The President, Senators and Congressmen, etc., take an oath
$similar to this, as well as those in the military. Foreign enemies seemed
$to have been easier to pick out than domestic enemies over the years,
$because it hasn't been until recent times that it has become clear to whom,
$and what, this term refers. It was a problem that was not possible at the
$founding of our country, but it was something that the founders saw was
$possible in the future - and that future is NOW.
$
$"Domestic enemies" of the Constitution. On its face, this would be anyone
$who does the opposite of preserving, protecting and defending the
$Constitution. It sure seems easy to spot a lot of people in Congress who
$fit this classification today. They take that oath and then spend the rest
$of their time in office doing the exact opposite of what they swore to do.
$We have Congressmen and Senators, as well as the President, all of whom are
$directly working to eliminate the rights, freedoms and liberties guaranteed
$under the Bill of Rights to the Constitution, and they are daily proclaiming
$their anti-Constitutional stand boldly before the public.
$
$One thing for sure, if the Constitution is dissolved, then every man, woman
$and child in this country has no rights, freedoms and liberties to claim for
$themselves, as that document is the only thing standing between tyrants and
$the people, guaranteeing those rights, freedoms and liberties.
$
$There is no doubt there are "domestic enemies" within our ranks today. They
$are doing an excellent job of destroying what we had set up for us by our
$founding fathers with those original documents. Anyone else out there have
$some information or thoughts on the term "domestic enemies" and what we can
$do about the problem?
See my post about this.
Class action suit anyone???
PEZ
--
PAUL EDWARD ZUKOWSKI "PEZ"
AS Eastern Conn State Univ. 1992 BA Trinity College 1996
PEZMANS WORLD http://www.freeyellow.com/members8/pez63/index.html
Cleo Literary Society - http://www.trincoll.edu/orgs/cleo/
Windsor Marksman - http://members.aol.com/wmaofct/
Both the Pen & the Sword are powerfull
My Email Addresses are
pzuk...@mail.trincoll.edu pez...@ntplx.net
See me at http://www.allexperts.com
I'd like to see them all locked up and/or shot as traitors to the
Constitution.
Websters New Collegiate Dictionary - Domestic Enemy -Definition -
Speedbyrd.et al
-*MORT*-
$Paul Edward Zukowski (PEZ) <pez...@ntplx.net> wrote in message
$news:pezcleo-0703...@p09-41.hartford.dialin.ntplx.com...
$>snip<
$> See my post about this.
$> Class action suit anyone???
$> PEZ
$
$Okay, PEZ. Where is it? I checked the hyperlinks at the bottom of your
$post and used Dogpile but could not find a post on this from you. I want to
$read it. Thanks
The idea was in post Clinton turns my stomac Bromo
Okay, PEZ. Where is it? I checked the hyperlinks at the bottom of your
post and used Dogpile but could not find a post on this from you. I want to
read it. Thanks
--
Halftoke
"Beware the Government that fears your gun."
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will fight to the death to protect
your right to say it."