The Nature of the US Military-Industrial-Financial Warplex -- "AGAINST" IS BETTER
senhor san
by Dick Eastman
Yep, we know the Oligarchy was gunning for us as much as for Arabs when they
got us to do the fightn, cause everybody knows that when this country has
sought to overthrow any other country they have always done so by fomenting
conflicts of some kind between that country and some other country. But now
we know they are gunning for us, because instead of getting Iran to fight
Iraq or Afganistan to fight Russia or Serbia to fight Croatia this time they
pulled the 9-11 mass-murder frameup so's we middle-class folks would have to
do the killin' and payin'. ?
And now they think they got us over a barrel cause we are stuck with two
skull 'n Bones pirates, Kerry and Bush as the only candidates and they know
lack the brains or gumption to think for ourselves and not rely on our own
traditional habitual political parties to do our thinking and deciding for
us, right?
But hold on. I don't see where it is written in the Constitution that we
have to be stupid fools and fall for the same damn trick every damn time, do
you? In fact, it seems to me as we've got them over a barrel.
Think about it. Most of us don't want this killing of foreigners and
getting our sons and daughters killed, especially when there's no point to
it. Iraq never hurt America and neither did Afganistan, nor did any of the
other countries they're talking about taking over next, did they.
Especially since we now know from the those pictures taken by witnesses at
the Pentagon and by the security camera they had there that the whole stoary
of hateful Arabs taking box cutters and taking over those jetliners and
crashing them is all a hoax. Got the URLs that prove it right here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
Like I said, we've got them over a barrel and, in fact, they've painted
themselves into a corner to boot.
Here's what I mean. Only a select few people in this country really enjoy
the idea of killing Arabs time or tossing our sons and daughers into the
furnace of war or bankrupting the country or making the criminal bosses
running this country even more rich and powerful, right? And its becoming
more and more obvious that that's what we're doing, isn't it?
Now think about it. That small group of people who love getting innocent
people killed and bankrupting the country and setting up rich-kid Emperor's
with a taste for throwing people to the lions, those people are no going to
be dividing their votes between Bonesman pirate Bush and Bonesman pirate
Kerry, right? Which means that there is going to be a minority that's
divided in its vote between equally desirable-to-them but
rotten-to-the-rest-of-us candidates, right?
So how can we loose? Only one way. If they get you to think that Bush and
Kerry, Democrat and Republican, are the only possible choices that can be
made. But that is totally untrue, unless they can hoodwink us into thinking
it is true so that we give up without even trying to take what is really
plum ripe for the taking. Did you get that?
Now, I haven't heard a peep from the Libertarians, or the Prohibitionists,
or the Socialist, or the Taxpayer Party, or the Greens, or the Reform Pary,
or any of those other parties, have you? And I haven't seen any man against
these wars and this theft and corruption even looking like he is thinking
about getting up on a white horse and asking one of these parties if he can
be their champion and go up against the plundering pirates to get them off
our throats, have you? I suspect that there is a lot of big money and
favors and politicing going on in all those parties to either keep them from
fielding an anti-war anti-plutocracy candidate or else to field one who is
such a jackass and who is so fatally flawed in so many ways that he won't
have a chance of winning, someone the party will just go through the motions
of supporting, but not really intending that the candidate would win -- not
really fighting for the candidate. Remember Pat Buchanan running on the
Reform Party Ticket?
So that is what they are counting on to keep their two bloodthirsty bonesmen
from getting any competition from a candidate and a party that will provide
the country with what the country really desperately needs.
The question is can we beat that game and are you willing to try?
I think their game can be beaten if we use the internet to get the situation
explained to enough people and then offer them the only way out that makes
any sense.
In fact it make so much sense I don't even have to spell it out for you.
But I will make this suggestion -- don't get behind a third party or a
candidate unless they and he frankly acknowledge that the odd of them living
through the reforms they will have to initiate are going to be too slim for
any regular politician to want to throw in. Harry Brown is going to look
out for number one and stay free of bullets in an unfree world. Buchanan is
going to spend his campaign in the pub talking about the little people.
Nader is actually pro-war and pro-occupation too -- in fact he probaly
declared as a independent "me-too" because he was afraid the Greens might
pick him again and force him to offer himself as a target to another
disturbed Catcher in the Rye fan. Kucinich, of course, is prohibited by
new laws from running as a third party candidate after seeking a major party
candidacy. So who does that leave for a third pary candidate?
Actually any honest intelligent candidate would do if he (or she) had the
heroic character and a simple grasp of how the oligarchy works its scams.
And since it would be a coalition of third parties, there would have to be
patronage, giving each party its own segment of the government for promote
their ideas.
Secretary of the Treasury: Libertarian nationalist (not an
anarcho-capitalist -- someone like Harry Browne)
Secretary of State: Buchananite
Secretary of Defense: Kucinich Democrat
Secretary of Interior: Naderite not beholden to lawyers
Attorney General: Populist willing to apply anti-trust where as it has
never been used before
Commerce: LaRouchian
Education: eliminate
etc.
Pooling all the best minds of each third party, plus the Kucinich and Dean
democrats and the paleoconservative Republicans to play rough and for
keeps with the old corruption -- who I think everyone will desert once they
are stripped of key power.
And I am sure we all have pet reforms we would like to put in to fix the
broken republic. Mine would be returning selection of Senators to the
respective state legislatures. Returning selection of the President to
locally elected electors who run as candidates in their own right tied to no
man or party -- but who convene in session until they agree on a President
and Vice President. That is the system the Founding Fathers gave us, and it
sure makes no sense to pretend that we support there principles when we have
let the criminals do away with the most important elements of the "checks
and balances" system, don't you think?
And of course I'd like to see international trade and the monetary system
re-regulated -- ending forever the practice of overseas investing, limiting
free trade to what it should be -- the trade in goods and in raw materials
and in tourism and nothing else.
So, tell me -- are you willing to foget about your past political party
habits and to get behind the first candidate of whatever third party who is
willing to end the war, end the occupation, and impose holy hell on the
corporations and the perverse corporation and financial system that made
these crimes inevitable.
They'll call him/her a dictator, like they did Huey Long, and they will
probably kill him or her like they did Huey too -- but that is what great
people do, isn't it? and we are about due for another crop of great people
arent we.
So let's watch the third parties and see which one has what it takes to
offer what it is going to take.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
senhor san
Gary Nolan, Aaron Russo, -- anyone else wanting the LP nomination?" and
received this almost perfectly cheering reply:
> Dick is right. Peacenics should not vote for Kerry. We should
> rally around a peace candidate. At least, it wouldn't do any harm.
> Let's discuss which one.
>
> David Cobb?
>
> Cobb's website says his first issue and priority is US troop
> withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iraq.
> http://www.votecobb.org/modules.php?
>
> Leonard Peltier?
My response:
How refreshing to find a kindred soul.
May I, however, suggest a little adjustment to the thinking behind this
welcomed positive response.
"Peaceniks" is far too narrow and unrepresentative a term -- I believe
Gandhi types are in the minority among us, most of us believe in national
self-defense from invasion etc. Rather, oppostion to the current policies
of both Bush and Kerry is much deeper than just moral and philosophic
opposition to war itself - although arugment on that score is sound also.
We are dealing with the destruction of America to obtain wealth from
everyone for the benefit of a tiny criminal ruling billionaire elite which
perpetrated 9-11 for that purpose (not let it happen, PERPETRATED IT!).
There are no terrorists except those black-op false-flag operatives with
which this conspiracy baited its frameup trap.
Men who are willing to fight for freedom and justice and the future are
included in our cause, because they know that these wars have perverted
national defense to serve the enemies of freedom, justice and the future.
They know that our sons and daughters have been kidnapped by a fraud (9-11)
and are being used as hit men in a foreign land, from which they will bring
back emotional scares and brutalization and nightmares they will never shake
off, as well as sickness from depleted uranium rounds and whatever else they
have breathed, touched and walked through in cities of bombed out factories,
chemical plants, etc. [Use your own brain to add to this paragraph -- I
have a more important point to make about candidates below.]
Cobb, with just what you have told us, is already ahead of Kerry and Bush
and Nader.
Of course there are others and we need to choose among them.
Two critieria to help select a better choice -- let's think of more --
1. Did he come by his position all of a sudden, or is it
the natural outgrowth of his previous record (statements,
actions) over time?
We want to look out for a Teddy Roosevelt who is only in
it to elect Morgan controllable Wilson; or Perot to elect Clinton
or Alan Keyes (William Krystol's roommate at Harvard) who
campaigned only to Christian groups to peel away "Christian"
voters (the present brainwashed "Christian Right") from truly
anti-globalization non-interventionist Patrick Buchanan who
needed that support to beat the globalist (neo-con controlled)
candidate Bob Dole for the GOP nomination in the 90's) etc.
2. Is he strong enough in personality and character and principle
(constitution, fiber, grit) not to be intimidated when he is in a room of
high-dominance intimidating men all aruging for the same wrong thing -- or
is he like little figurehead organaztion-penant who blows with the wind or
whoever waves a fan at him -- like GW Bush in the presence of Cheney or
Sharon?
[Grover Cleavland was a tough prosecutor and he stood
against J.P. Morgan on who controls US monetary and
economic policy (Morgan wanted the silver act repealed
and just a gold standard -- a deflationary policy bad for
Americans but great because deflationary for the bond-holding
class -- AND SO MORGAN HAD CLEAVLAND ROUGHED UP,
HIS JAW BROKEN, WHICH WAS REPLACED WITH A JAW OF
VULCANIZED RUBBER ON A MORGAN YACHT (SOME
HISTORIANS WRONGLY SAY IT WAS A CANCEROUS GROWTH
THAT WAS REMOVED WITH THE JAW -- BUT THIS IS UNTRUE)
I share the above story so you and the candidate we choose
will have a clue of what he (and we behind him) will be up
against going into the campaign and into the White House..
see " *" below.
Remember the "pretzel" affair? A black eye from choking on
a pretzel and fainting and hitting his head on the corner of a
table?
DICK EASTMAN
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
*Here is one even more disturbing example of the thesis that good
Presidents are in mortal danger even when behind closed guarded doors -- ,
although in this case I have not run across anything that would lend
support to this account -- although researching it was on my "to do" list
before 9-11 happened. However, true or false, take it as a timley
"cautionary tale:"
>From Pandora's Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286:
The following information was derived from information that exists in the
Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police
files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United
States and Europe:
"Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of
the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a
White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a
pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln.
The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to
participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the
reception room. What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the
royal European personage?
It seems that the practice of promiscuity was running rampant in many
families in those days and the German King Leopold had, had an illegitimate
daughter named Elizabeth who was sent to America, where she lived in a very
comfortable manner. Although Leopold could not recognize her position, he
was very interested in her life.
In the early or mid 1850s, Abraham Lincoln and Elizabeth began having sexual
liaisons that produced twin daughters named Ella and Emily in 1856. The
regal German father who was so royally up-set with ol' honest Abe probably
had full knowledge of what the true blood line of Lincoln really was.
Abraham's wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella
and Emily until 1865. Previous to being informed about Elizabeth and the
twins, Mrs. Lincoln had developed a ravaging dependency on opium. Her main
supplier of the drug was a former member of the Confederate Intelligence
community, he was a former member because the Southern gentlemen did not
approve of his drug pushing and unreliable behavior. It was because of his
involvement with
the Souther Intelligence Community, Mary's supplier - John Wilks Booth -
knew about the lover and the illegal twins.
After being spurned by the Confederate intelligence community, Mary's 'candy
man' approached and became involved with the Rothschild Empire of Europe,
for he realized the European banking moguls would be very interested in his
pipeline to the White House.
(At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the North
and South. After the Civil War ended. The issue needed to be popular to all
levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars and
Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history.
Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would
galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting
loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the
Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the
Rothschilds were trying to take control of the entire world monetary system,
and at that time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America
and find a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon
family that were gaining control in this country through government help...
Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia Company
covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail
Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal
families of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter
what their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now
what Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in
favor of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their
family bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs
and stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history
books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in
America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family
companies in the early 1920s...
(But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to
his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with
the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild
family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's
drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the
United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of the
Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and then
dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted President
was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be informed of
Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.
The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his
perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the
North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being
informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug
supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was
impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after
with plenty of opium. Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in
Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her
husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the
confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.
The plotters decided the Presidential snatch needed to take place in a
public, yet discreet location where minimum witnesses would be present.
There were too many potential witnesses at the White House. Two hours before
the capture was to take place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum,
because Abe had decided not to go out of the White House that night. Mary's
outrageous outburst caused Abe to change his mind and the First family
departed. Several minutes after arriving at the kidnap location, Mary
instructed the family bodyguard to take a position that placed the First
Family out of his visual sight. The position also required the bodyguard to
traverse several flights of stairs to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed
for any reason...A wagon with a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of
the kidnap location with several men including Mary's opium supplier. The
plan was for the drug pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently
move down a hallway, and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary
and Abe were sitting.
After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an
urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending
down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The
kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow
Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean. When
Booth actually opened the door to
the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and
shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First
Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door...When she was
sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the
President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the
lower left earlobe of her husband.
Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the
First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did not know
if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were
the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth
with the kidnapping or there to point the false finger at the 'innocent'
Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to
find out the answer to that question. The only escape route was to jump the
balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth
gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he
fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and
the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.
In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham
Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they would use
a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder
and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol
if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to the victim. The gun
on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left
handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd
was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was
imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her
husband.
In the 1860s, an act of Congress mandated the compensation of widows
of former and active Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents and Presidents.
The mouth and duration was ratified by both Houses of Congress for each
widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her widowers compensation three times
and was denied the mandated compensation three times by both Houses of
Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for Mary's passage to Europe where she
died in small cottage in Germany.
In 1867, the Secret Service was founded so that drunken municipal law
enforcement could not unwittingly participate with drug-addicted First
Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow killings of philandering
Presidents of the United States. (To cover up the murders committed which
would reflect a bad light for the presiding Administration, such as the
Foster murder is doing at the present time).
================
ANSWERING BONESMEN SUPPORTERS:
The logic of this argument vote-for-Kerry-even-though-you-know-he-is-rotten
strategy eludes me, but the smell comes across real strong.
For example, the baffling thought process behind this arugment:
<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v
> that to decide issues only on their effect on the people in the
> USA (and even then, excluding most of the poor working class in the
> USA), is a non-tenable position from an anti-imperialist point of
> view, one that puts the interest of USA citizens above the rest of
> the people of the world. If you think giving the Neo-Imperialists
> an endorsement from the American people by letting them get
> re-elected will be doing any favors for the international victims
> then you've been smoking too much wacky-weed. ... There seem
> to be a multitude of incipient "leaders" telling everyone that if
> they don't vote for a third candidate so he can impress everyone
> with his 5-6% vote the world will come to an end. I don't have a
> problem following others but the others have to display some brains.
<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v<^v
Listen, yipzdu02women4peace.andKerry.org and redbird, WE OPPOSE KERRY NOT
BECAUSE WE PUT THE INTERESTS OF US CITIZENS ABOVE THE INTERESTS OF THE
PEOPLE OF THE WORLD -- BUT BECAUSE WE FIGHT THE INTERESTS OF
ORGANIZED-CRIME PIRATE POWER ELITE THAT HAS PUT UP BOTH KERRY AND BUSH FOR
THE PLUNDER AND SUBJUGATION OF ALL THE PEOPLE OF THE EARTH INCLUDING U.S.
CITIZENS. THE TWISTED IDEA THAT KERRY IS UNSELFISHLY LOOKING OUT FOR THE
PEOPLE OF THE WORLD AND THAT THE ANTI-GLOBALIZATION,
ANTI-IMPERIALIST-FOR-CORPORATION-GLOBAL-MONOPOLY, ANTI-9-11-MASS-MURDER
PERPETRATOR INTERNET ACTIVISTS ARE SOMEHOW OPPOSING THE INTERESTS OF THE
AVERAGE AMERICAN CITIZEN AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF WORLD HUMANITY IS A CROCK
OF SHIT THAT I SAY QUALIFIES YOU AS AN ENEMY OF BOTH THE PEOPLE OF THE
UNITED STATES AND THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD.
LET ME SHARE THE ONLY SENSIBLE THE ONLY INTELLIGENT POSITION ON KERRY, THE
ANTI-BUSH AND ANTI-KERRY POSITION, THE ONLY COURSE THAT HAS A GHOST OF A
CHANCE.
Let's be smarter than they are for a change.
We know the Oligarchy was gunning for us as much as for Arabs when they got
Why so sure about the Pentagon?
by Dick Eastman
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
1. Pentagon security camera shows
a. Too short a plane
b. Smoke trail of a missile being fired
c. White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead
2. Photos show wrong crash imprint in the wall
3. Photos show and wrong flash-powder burn darkening the wall
4. Downed lampposts and witnesses each identified a different
approach path to the Pentagon, the Boeing's and the killer jet's
5. Wrong kind of debris
6. Single piece of right kind of debris shown to have been
found on the opposite side of the approach path from
the side of the plane where that particular piece had
to have come from.
7. Witnesses also
a. heard a missile
b. heard a sonic boom prior to blast
c. smelled burning chordite after the blast
d. saw a radar blip behaving like a jet-fighter blip
8. No photos of wreckage from inside consistent with the crash
9. Evidence of only one engine and one seat , a pilots seat.
10. A distraction plane, ur engine plane making dives over D.C.
both photographed, videotaped and shown on BBC, and
reported (erroneously) by many wintesses as the actual plane
"diving at an irrecoverable angle)
11. The attack was made almost horizontally into the first-floor
level -- consistent with a countour-hugging jet-fighter attack
12. Normal rescuers were prevented from entering the building
while only certain people, including Rumsfeld himself, conducted
(screened) victims from the building
13. Rumsfeld had recently been given exclusive power to
OK air interceptions -- and yet he was in his office the whole
time the twin towers were hit, and when the Pentagon was
hit he went to oversee "rescue" instead of going to the situation
room where his interception authority could be given -- he
arrived at the situation room at about the time the Pennsylvania
plane (backup for the Pentagon) was finally shot down.
14. The various drills and practices for an air attack on the Pentagon
including some kind of simulation on 9-11-01 itself, coupled with
denials that such an attack had been considered possible.
15. Impossible stories by, for example, John Judge (regarding
his amazing stewardess friend who claims to have seen the
Boeing inside the hole, recognized the plane as the one she
always flew, recongized her stewardess friend as a victim by
a photo of her severed arm with the matching "friendship
bracelett" they both wore; that she was passing out
doughnuts and coffee to the rescue workers with the salvation
army when the salvation army was nowhere in evidence at the
scene -- John Judge who is a professional JFK conspiracy
theory debunker and discloses that this same stewardess
friend is also a JFK theory investigator, the same
John Judge who launched the phony "People's Investigation
of 9-11 with a press conference by stating that the Pentagon
attack is not something responsible investigators should bother
investigating etc. since we "know" the Boeing hit the Pentagon
and don't want to be a laughing stock etc. -- the People's investigation
that never once reviewed any of the evidence packages I posted
to them -- the same John Judge who to this day refuses to
debate Dick Eastman on any internet forum and whom all --
dare I use the term -- "responsible" 9-11 investigators think is
a John Judge who is working for the coverup, for obstruction
of justice, and because he does it so badly is himself become
one of the proofs of the frameup along with the known-only-to
himself flight attendant who works one of the flights that
most definitely had to have been regularly monitored by
US intelligence operatives, probably flight attendents, and
this one just happened not to take Flight 77 that day by
happenstance etc. -- so how about it, Mr. Judge?
16. The deaths of only the CIA's indepdendent intelligence
revivals , the Offices of Naval Intelligence personel, and auditors
of defense spending contracts etc. alone moved
into the "newly renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
where most of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
dead or people involved with driving their cars. Naval Intelligence
would have independently investigated 9-11 had they lived --
the investigator that no official has yet conducted -- Wolfowitz
sure bin Laden had done it and ready with the solution of invading
Afganistan on the very first day -- even as they were allegedly taken
by complete suprise only a few hours before that determination.
See the many photos and witness testimony and further analysis
by respected scientific minds establishing all of the above here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
and
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
senhor san
Without 9-11 Investigators' Input its Conclusions are Uninformed Opinion at
Best
by Dick Eastman
Citizen investigator of 9-11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The Commission -- originally planned to be headed by Henry Kissinger who
once said, "It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of
what is perceived to be true." -- has never acknowledged publically the
existence of citizens with photographic evidence they claim establishes
that 9-11 to have been frame-up.
Al Falzenberg has been the gatekeeper and triage of all information
directed to the Committee -- note the Jewish name and realize that the Bush
administration would not select one of the 45 percent of Jews who oppose the
current wars of conquest against Moslem nations -- must be held accountable
for active obstruction of justice, for assisting in a coverup of evidence
that fingers the true perpetrators.
The Commission, I conclude, and I am confident future impartial history will
bear me out, has had only two objectives from the beginning:
1. To consumate the cover-up; and
2. To provide contrived rationale for consolidation of police power into a
Stalinist "NVKD"-type police state, unanswerable to anyone, the operations
and objectives of which are unknown to anyone, and the control of which
remains in the hands of America's power-elite Oligarcy, the proven
perpetrators of 9-11.
Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Washington 98908
---
Are you also uninformed about the evidence proving 9-11 was a frame-up?
Here is the critical information needed to derive an informed opinion of
what really happened on September 11, 2001:
Consider what citizen investigators have uncovered regarding the alleged
"attack" on the Pentagon:
7. Witnesses also
a. heard a missile
only-to himself flight attendant who works one of the flights that
most definitely had to have been regularly monitored by
US intelligence operatives, probably flight attendents, and
this one just happened not to take Flight 77 that day by
happenstance etc. -- so how about it, Mr. Judge?
16. The deaths of only the CIA's indepdendent intelligence
revivals , the Offices of Naval Intelligence personel, and
auditors of defense spending contracts etc. alone moved
into the "newly renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
where most of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
dead or people involved with driving their cars. Naval Intelligence
would have independently investigated 9-11 had they lived --
the investigator that no official has yet conducted -- Wolfowitz
sure bin Laden had done it and ready with the solution of invading
Afganistan on the very first day -- even as they were allegedly taken
by complete suprise only a few hours before that determination.
See the evidence photos and witness testimony confirming all of the above
and further analysis in support of these conclusions by respected men of
science here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
and here
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
=====
The origin of what was eventually called human rights can be traced to the
most ancient times in human history. Ideas of the value and inviolability of
life and of the equality of people before the authorities can be found in
ancient myths and beliefs. Eventually, such views became widespread in
ancient Greece as a logical outcome of democracy practiced in the polises.
In most cases these views were related to the notion of citizenship,
envisioning the equality of all members of the polis in the exercise of
their rights and freedoms, above all political freedoms. The writings of the
ancient Greek sophists of the 6th-5th centuries B.C. laid down the
fundamental concept of natural law eventually developed by the philosophers
and men of law of ancient Rome. Similar ideas were also taking shape in the
East. In particular, the Chinese philosopher Mo Ti (5th century B.C.)
entertained the idea that all people were equal before Heaven, while the
state was the result of their agreement.
senhor san
I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area.
The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man,
because the Palestinian childs existence infers that generations will
go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an
Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would
make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750
Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by
raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and
we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do
but we tell others what they shall do."
[Ariel Sharon, current Prime Minister, In an interview with General
Ouze Merham, 1956]
Yes, but what is behind Ariel Sharon -- what power let a man who thinks
like this gain control of Israel? what power let men like Wolfowitz, Perle,
Kissinger and Rumsfeld etc. gain control of the United States foriegn policy
and military with total abdication of the exclusive constitutional
war-making-powers of the Senate?
In short, who is bringing down the US with forced suicidal wars? Look to
the creditors of our planned economic destruction -- billionaire Merchant
Bankers who trade with China and with them to the Chinese princeling
dictatorship itself.
Always aware of this fact, yet we ignore it in our political discourse
because it is too big to take into account, to crushing to mind and spirit
to consider.
The Chinese (in this case Chow En-lai (Zhou Enlai) was the mastermind) make
ware indirectly by corrupting the "princes" of the enemy state and having
them destroy their own country from withing.
But the Chinese are allied with, are part of, are inseperable from the
merchant bankers (Rothschilds etc.) who have made their money from
monopolizing trade between China and the West and from the drug trade where
the East India Company -- the first multinational corporation in the modern
sense -- conquered India exactly as Afganistan has been captured (using
corporation mercenary armies mixed with "sucker" soldiers from the country
the parasite merchants have attached to (Britain under DeIsraeli, America
under first Baruch, then Rockefeller, now Perle, Wolfowitz, Kissinger,
Brzezinski etc. -- just to suggest the influences of arrangements not well
understood) and for the same purpose, opium.
China, before Western corporations entered the scene, was ruled by a nearly
perfect government undet the Ming Dynasty. It was a state that was
self-sufficient and highly moral -- but corrupted by outsiders who wanted
its wealth and who bankrolled the Manchu who overthrew the Ming --
allowing the first intercourse with the West (Marco Polo etc.)
Today China is ruled by the Triad princelings -- Zhou Enlai, having
enlisted the Triad families networked to all overseas Chinese to save the
Chinese dictatorship after several near-fatal mistakes by the Mao regime.
The Triads helped Zhou with his plane of destroying the West through drug
invasion, social sabotage by Princes under the control of the planned
subversion. That is why the US government has done everything to destroy
the US socially and economically, sugar-coating their poisoned pills with
spin from their monopoly media.
And yes, Zionism is part and parcel of the ancient banking monopolies of
China-West trade -- it is the ideology of the great Merchant Banking houses
of Europe -- and it is the alienatable Zionist Jew that has most
consistently been the most reliable agent of this Sino-Zionist war of
cultural, economic, and psycho-chemical warfare. [I should add that "the
Jews" are as much victims of the Sino-Zionist conspiracy, as anyone -- for
it is the later that have undone the assimilation and melding of Jew and
Gentile into one civilization -- creating Hitler for that purpose -- these
being the financial powers within Germany that sent Lenin in an armed German
train and got Trotsky from Brooklyn to Moscow to ensure that no liberal
republic would arise from the ashes of the liberal Romanov Dynasty (easily
the most liberal autocrat of his age -- the liberalism of the British being
only an on-again off-again thing as liberals got the worst of it from Tories
and later always Tony-Blairish Labour.)
Never think that a few hundred billionaires could themselves hold out
against the billions of the world population -- especially the warped crop
of billionaires by inheritance that seem to be on top in the West -- the
fact is that they are on top and thriving because of the great hostile power
behind them.
The US has seven percent of the world population. Perle, Wolfowitz, and
Kissinger who are the Board controlling Rumsfeld and the unified US military
and foreign policy fully intend to grind the American military to sausage in
the cities of Iraq and Afganistan and the cities of other targeted Moslem
nations still on their to-do list. And in the end when the princelings of
China are ready, there will be war with Korea -- did you forget that
technically the Korean War of the early 1950's never ended -- that the
Chinese have merely been strategically waiting (and subverting) until there
is a favorable "correlation of forces" as their
Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist-Maoist warfare doctines combined with the older
and more pervasive Chinese military traditions of Sun Tzu etc demand?
How should you react to all this when someone lays out reality for you?
You should re-prioritize your life, from one of trying to hold your own in a
deteriorating economy and culture, and become a citizen conscious that his
goverment has been taken over by a ruthless enemy bent on your destruction,
bent on the destruction of us all. In practice that means
1) exposing the hostile subverters for the crime of September 11, 01 (use
the evidence from the Pentagon attack which shows that the Boeing overflew
the target as another aircraft performed the missile attack and
crashbombing;
2) defeating both subverted party leaderships and the the candidates they
have manipulated to nomination (Kerry and Bush -- as if these were the best
men in the country to run this government!!! and then throwing out the
Congressional and Court leadership by legal proceedings, and putting in
politicians who are loyal to the Constitution and to Western Civilization
itself, who will repair the structure of government (for example returning
selection of Senators to the state legislatures, freeing the Presidential
electors from the political parties so that, as the founding fathers
originally designed, we merely choose the most intelligent people from our
communities as electors who will then convene and pick us a benevolent and
competent philosopher rather than a Bush or Clinton or Eisenhower or Johnson
or Wilson -- to name some prime examples. (And there have been presidents
unaware of what was going on in their Administrations -- Reagan, partially
FDR, partially Wilson.
3) breaking up the power of the subverters by taking down the corporations,
first and foremost breaking up the media
onopoly/oligopoly/concentration -- outlawing interstate newspaper chains
and ending the legality of the holding company -- each country being
allowed to assume ownership of all the physical assets of the eliminated
multinationals contained within their boarders
4) ending unregulated international trade and eliminating international
investment -- this must be done by international agreement among nations
that have freed themselves from the billionaire "traitor princes" --
elimination of all international debt of all nations
Hey, do I think you are going to do this?
Ha ha ha.
Although a remote hope that all things are possible impels me to telegraph
this suggestion to you.
This is what I would do.
It is the only way out that I can see.
Letter #2:
The current Presidential election in the United States will be pivotal for
the future course of political history throughout the world.
If the Oligarchy is able to elect one of its two criminal stooges, Bush or
Kerry, for another four years of war and consolidated tyranny and plunder,
and do so despite the being made public throughout the world the guilt of
the governing in perpetrating the September 11, 01 false-flag black-op
inside-job mass-murder frame-up of innocent Moslems for purposes of theft,
monopoly, heroin profits and racist murdering of innocents in the Mideast
and Central Asia, then we must conclude that the remaining vestiges of the
checks and balances originally built into our constituion to prevent the
centralization of a despotic power no longer avail in safeguarding our
freedoms and the means of life against more such intrigues of the
economically powerful who can mold any form of political machinery to their
own advantage -- and concluding that we must then proceed to tear down the
entire structure of laws and institutions that have no become mere
instrumentalities of theft, fraud, privilege and exploitation -- eliminating
this individual-repressing monstrosity that violates all laws of human
nature and well-being. The American people -- the second Kerry or Bush are
declared the winner of presiding over four more years of oligarchic crimes
against humanity -- must instantly resort to self-defense against these
morally and intellectual inferior men in high places who begger and murder
us (9-11, cocaine, heroin, war, economics, pollution, useful-to-them crime
and immorality, and now taking our sons and daughters in the prime of their
young lives to be spent in killing and being killed in foreign lands against
innocent and wholly respectable and worthy peoples in Iraq and Afganistan,
not unlike we ourselves in our victimization at the hands of global piracy.
They seek only our devt-slavery dependence and submission. It is the
esploitation of humanity by unjust and ill-gotten claims, bringing people of
infinite worth and goodness to conditions of chronic helplessness,
uselessness, worthlessness, planned ignorance, superstition and traumatized
emotion -- so that we are dead in our social relations and our capactiites
for benefiting life and giving happiness which each of us was born capable
of doing and desirous of doing -- while, meanwhile, the children of the
oligarchy live in veryt luxury and with perfect mobility and advantage for
their spoiled junior tyrant children. And with these advantages going to
their children, growing them strong and familiar with so much of the good
things in the world, which so much richer an education than the rest of us
can ever hope to scrape together for our crying children -- they take their
childrens health and vigor over ours as the sure sign of their natural
nobility, of their natural superiority over us, when it fact the deformity
of our children is most unnatural, most unjust, most indicative of their own
moral and political unfitness to rule over anyone or even to looks us
squarely in the face as anything like our equals in morality, ethics or
general regard for others and for this country. Yet, despite their abuse of
power to shower themselves with our wealth, obtained through teft, fraud,
rigging the game and all means of holding down their fellows, amazingly
engenders feelings of superiority within them! far in excess of any real
merit or earned distinction they, even with their ill-gotten advantages,
have attained -- when infact their position and status stands on nothing but
a willingness to cheat, bribe, rob blind and murder.
IF BUSH OR KERRY ENDS UP THE NEW PRESIDENT AFTER THE NOVEMEBER ELECTIONS --
DEPITE ALL THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE WAR; DESPITE ALL THOSE WHO OPPOSE THE
CORPORATIONS; DESPITE ALL THOSE WHO OPPSE RULE BY THE OLIGARCHY; DESPITE ALL
THOSE WHO OPPOSE GLOBALIZATION THEFT; DESPITE ALL THOSE UNEMPLOYED,
UNDEREMPLOYED, RUINED, FORECLOSED, BURIED IN DEBT BECAUSE OF POLICIES
SERVING THIS TINY ELITE THAT CONTROLS THE TWO PARTIES FROM THE TOP; DESITE
THOSE, EVEN BETTER INFORMED, WHO OPPOSE RULE BY SECRET CRIMINAL SOCIETY; AND
MOST OF ALL, OPPOSE RULE BY LEADERSHIP THAT WOULD PERPETRATE THE 9-11
FRAME-UP MASS-MURDER ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SO THAT WE WOULD WILLING TURN
OVER ALL OF OUR WEALTH AND THE VERY LIVES OF OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS FOR THEM
TO SEND ON FOOLS ERANDS, ON HIT-MEN'S ERRANDS AGAINST INNOCENT PEOPLE
EXACTLY LIKE WE OURSELVES -- IF ONE OF THESE TWO OLIGARCH FRONT MEN IS
PRESIDENT IN JANUARY OF 2005, THEN WHAT THE DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND SECURITY
HAS PREDICED WILL INDEED BE THE CASE -- THE OLIGARCHY IS GOING TO NEED
MUCH MUCH MORE SEVERE POLICE STATE LAWS AND POWERS AND PERSONEL TO GUARD
AGAINST THE "EXTREMISM" THAT IS WAITING IN THE WINGS -- THEY ARE GOING TO
NEED A HUNDRED TIMES MORE THAN ANYTHING EVEN DREAMED UNDER THE PATRIOT ACT
AND HOMELAND SECURITY. THEY THINK THE NEXT STEP OF THEIR TYRANNY IS
BEING HELD BACK UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION -- A CONTEST TO SEE WHICH PIT BULL
GETS TO CHEW UP OUR CHILDREN IN THE PLAYGROUND -- BUT LET ME TELL THE PIT
BULLS THIS -- WE TOO ARE ALSO GOING TO BE BEHAVING DIFFERENTLY AFTER THIS
ELECTION IF ANOTHER OF YOUR KIND IS AGAIN SADDLED ON OUR BACKS. YOU HAVE
OBSTRUCTED SOCIETY'S NATURAL STRIVING FOR BETTER LIFE IN EVERY NATION --
KEEPING US IN OUTRAGEOUS CONSTRAINTS OF BAD LAWS AND CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AND
RAW MONOPOLY POWER -- PRETENDING ALL THE TIME TO BE "LOVING AMERICA," OF
CARING FOR OUR "DEFENSE" OR SERVING OUR "FREEDOM" AND MOST OF ALL OF
PROTECTING "PROPERTY" WHICH IN FACT YOU NOW OWN ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY. FOR
FIFTY YEARS, MAYBE A HUNDRED YEARS, WE KNEW IT WAS HAPPENING BUT WE DIDN'T
BOTHER TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT -- BECAUSE IT WASN'T PERSONALLY WORTH THE
FIGHT TO US -- BUT NOW IT WILL BE. NOW WE ARE GOING TO BRING DOWN YOUR
ASSES BECAUSE WE SEE IT MEANS DEATH TO EVERYONE IF WE DON'T.
YOU, OLIGARCHS AND THE BOGUS CHRISTIANITY YOU FORCE ON THE POOR -- THE
EXACT ANTITHESIS OF THE TEACHINGS OF THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT -- AND YOUR
MEDIA MONOPOLY -- ALL OF IT WILL BE SWEPT AWAY -- YOUR HOLDINGS
CONFISCATED ALL AROUND THE WORLD, YOUR CONTROL OVER CORPORATIONS ENDED,
YOUR CONTRACTS AND BONDS AND DERIVATIVES INVALIDATED -- THE PHYSICAL
CORPORATIONS DIVIDED AMONG THE NATIONS WHERE THEY NOW SPRAWL AND BROKEN UP
INTO SO MANY SMALL CONCERNS IN LEGAL ENVIRONMENTS WHERE LARGE CONCENTRATIONS
OF ECONOMIC POWER WILL NO LONGER BE POSSIBLE -- WHERE THE MONOPOLIZATION OF
THE WEALTH OF OUR EFFORTS AND THE EFFORTS OF OUR PARTENTS AND GRANDPARENTS
ALL OF WHICH YOU HAVE ACCUMULATED TO YOURSELVES, WILL BE FREED FROM YOUR
MISERABLE ANTI-SOCIAL MURDEROUS HANDS, THE HANDS BEHIND ALL THE WORLDS
SUFFERING AND INJUSTICE.
I JUST CAN'T WAIT FOR KERRY OR BUSH TO WIN -- IT WILL BE SO MUCH EASIER
THEN -- SO MUCH CLEARER WHAT WE HAVE TO DO.
YES, YOU WERE RIGHT. WE ARE EITHER FOR YOU OR AGAINST YOU -- IT WAS YOU
WHO LEFT US NO OTHER CHOICE.
DICK EASTMAN
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON